atlantic sunrise maps

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC 2800 Post Oak Boulevard (77056) P.O. Box 1396 Houston, Texas 77251-1396 713/215-2000 April 30, 2014 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Attention: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Reference: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Atlantic Sunrise Project Docket No. PF14-8 Draft Resource Report 1 and Summary of Alternatives Dear Ms. Bose: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (“Transco”) hereby submits Draft Resource Report 1 and a Summary of Alternatives for the proposed Atlantic Sunrise Project. This submittal contains only Public information. Any questions regarding this submittal should be directed to Anne Allen at (713) 215-2406 or Roberta Zwier at (713) 215-2676. Respectfully, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC By: William H. Hammons Regulatory Analyst, Lead Rates and Regulatory 713-215-2130 713-215-3483 (fax) Enclosures cc: Jennifer Kerrigan, Geologist, Division of Gas – Environment and Engineering

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

Initial Draft Resource Report No. 1

General Project Description

Atlantic Sunrise Project

April 2014

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT NO. 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ii

RESOURCE REPORT 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

SUMMARY OF COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION

INFORMATION FOUND IN

Provide a detailed description and location map of the Project facilities (§ 380.12 (c)(1)).

Section 1.1; Figure 1.1-1

Describe any non-jurisdictional facilities that would be built in association with the Project (§ 380.12 (c)(2)).

Section 1.9

Provide current original U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute series topographic maps with mileposts showing the Project facilities (§ 380.12 (c)(3)).

Attachment A

Provide aerial images or photographs or alignment sheets based on these sources with mileposts showing the Project facilities (§ 380.12 (c)(3)).

Attachment A

Provide plot/site plans of compressor stations showing the location of the nearest noise-sensitive areas (NSA) within 1 mile (§ 380.12 (c)(3,4)).

To be provided with draft Resource Report 1 in 3rd or 4th quarter 2014

Describe construction and restoration methods (§ 380.12 (c)(6)).

Section 1.3

Identify the permits required for construction across surface waters (§ 380.12 (c)(9)).

Section 1.6 Table 1.6-1

Provide the names and addresses of all affected landowners and certify that all affected landowners will be notified as required in §157.6(d) (§ 380.12 (c)(10)).

To be provided under separate cover by May 6, 2014

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT INITIAL DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT NO. 1 – GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 PROPOSED FACILITIES ..................................................................................................... 1-2

1.1.1 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................... 1-2

1.1.2 Location and Description of Facilities ........................................................................ 1-3

1.1.3 Location Maps, Detailed Site Maps, and Plot/Site Maps ......................................... 1-14

1.2 LAND REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................... 1-14

1.2.1 Pipeline Facilities ..................................................................................................... 1-15

1.2.2 Aboveground Facilities ............................................................................................ 1-20

1.2.3 Contractor and Pipe Yards ...................................................................................... 1-22

1.2.4 Access Roads .......................................................................................................... 1-23

1.2.5 Additional Temporary Workspace ............................................................................ 1-23

1.3 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND PROCEDURES .............................................................. 1-23

1.3.1 Construction Schedule ............................................................................................. 1-25

1.3.2 General Pipeline Construction Procedures .............................................................. 1-25

1.3.3 Specialized Construction Procedures ...................................................................... 1-34


1.3.5 Environmental Compliance, Training, and Inspection ............................................. 1-48

1.3.6 Training .................................................................................................................... 1-49

1.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ............................................................... 1-49

1.4.1 Pipeline Facilities ..................................................................................................... 1-49


1.5 FUTURE PLANS AND ABANDONMENT .............................................................................. 1-53

1.6 PERMITS AND APPROVALS ............................................................................................. 1-53

1.6.1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Pre-Filing ................................................. 1-56

1.7 PROJECT OUTREACH ..................................................................................................... 1-57

1.7.1 Public Participation .................................................................................................. 1-58

1.7.2 Agency Consultation ................................................................................................ 1-60

1.8 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ................................................................................................... 1-61

1.9 NON-JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES ................................................................................... 1-62

1.10 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 1-62


iv

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1-1 Transco’s Customers and Transportation Capacity Subscribed to the

Project ................................................................................................................ 1-3

Table 1.1-2 Summary of Project Pipeline Facilities ............................................................... 1-5

Table 1.1-3 Summary of Project New Aboveground Facilities .............................................. 1-7

Table 1.1-4 Summary of Project Modified Aboveground Facilities ........................................ 1-7

Table 1.1-5 Summary of Project New Meter and Regulator Station Design

Specifications ................................................................................................... 1-12

Table 1.1-6 Summary of Project Mainline Valves ................................................................ 1-14

Table 1.2-1 Summary of Land Requirements for Project Pipeline Facilities ........................ 1-15

Table 1.2-2 Summary of Co-location of Pipeline Facilities for the Project ........................... 1-19

Table 1.2-3 Land Requirements for Project Aboveground Facilities ................................... 1-21

Table 1.2-4 Project Contractor and Pipe Yards ................................................................... 1-22

Table 1.3-1 Summary of Project Proposed Modifications to FERC Plan and

Procedures ....................................................................................................... 1-24

Table 1.3-2 Transco Standard Minimum Specifications for Pipeline Depth of Cover

(inches) ............................................................................................................. 1-30

Table 1.3-3 Steep Slopes Crossed by the Project Pipelines ............................................... 1-39

Table 1.4-1 Maximum Interval Between Patrols .................................................................. 1-51

Table 1.6-1 Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations to be Applied

for/Requested for the Project ........................................................................... 1-54

Table 1.7-1 Scheduled Project Open Houses ..................................................................... 1-59

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1-1 Atlantic Sunrise Project Location Map ................................................................ 1-4

Figure 1.3-1 Typical Right-of-Way Cross-Section Pipeline Construction Sequence ............ 1-26


v

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Aerial and USGS Topographic Map Excerpts of Project Facilities

Attachment B Summary of Modified Meter and Regulator Station Locations

Attachment C Typical Right-of-Way Cross-Section Diagrams

Attachment D Summary Table of Agency Correspondence

Attachment E Landowner Complaint Resolution Procedures


vi

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AC alternating current

ANSI American National Standards Institute

API American Petroleum Institute

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ATWS Additional Temporary Workspace

BMP best management practice

Certificate Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

Commission or FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

CPL Central Penn Line

Dth/d dekatherms per day

ECP Environmental Compliance Plan

EI Environmental Inspector

EIA Energy Information Administration

HDD horizontal directional drill

hp horsepower

INGAA Interstate Natural Gas Association of America

MAOP maximum allowable operating pressure

MMDth/d million dekatherms per day

MLV mainline valve

MP milepost

NRCS Natural Resource Conservation Service

PADEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

PADCNR Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

PANPDES Pennsylvania National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

PGC Pennsylvania Game Commission

Project Atlantic Sunrise Project

psig pounds per square inch gauge

RCP residential construction plan

ROW right-of-way

RR Resource Report

Tcf trillion cubic feet


vii

Transco Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation

USGS U.S. Geological Survey


1-1

This resource report (RR) provides general information regarding the proposed Atlantic

Sunrise Project (Project). This includes Project mapping, descriptions of the pipeline and

aboveground facilities, construction methodologies, applicable permits, and anticipated

construction schedule. The Project is currently in development, engineering, and data collection

phase. Pending information and subsequent filings are noted in this RR in grey italics with the

anticipated filing dates.

1 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco), a subsidiary of Williams

Partners L.P. (Williams), will file an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and

Necessity (Certificate) with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission)

for the Project. The Project is an expansion of Transco’s existing natural gas transmission

system that will enable Transco to provide 1.7 million dekatherms per day (MMDth/d) of

incremental firm transportation capacity for growing supplies of natural gas from northern

Pennsylvania to various delivery points along the Transco Mainline system to as far south as

the Station 85 Pooling Point1 in Choctaw County, Alabama. The Project consists of the following

primary components:

• Approximately 177.3 miles of new 30-inch and 42-inch diameter greenfield

pipelines in Pennsylvania;

• Approximately 14.5 miles of new 36-inch and 42-inch diameter pipeline loops in

Pennsylvania;

• Two new compressor stations in Pennsylvania;

• Additional ancillary facilities, such as mainline valves (MLVs), cathodic

protection, communication towers, and internal inspection device launchers and

receivers in Pennsylvania;

• Additional compression and related modifications to three existing compressor

stations in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia;

• Two new meter stations with interconnecting piping in Pennsylvania;

• Three new regulator stations with interconnecting piping in Pennsylvania;

• Approximately 2.52 miles of 30-inch diameter pipeline replacements in Virginia;

1 A pooling point defines the aggregation of gas from multiple physical and/or virtual receipt points to a single physical or virtual point; and the disaggregation of gas from a single physical or virtual point to multiple physical and/or virtual delivery points.


1-2

• Modifications to six existing compressor stations that enable compression for bi-

directional flow, and/or supplemental odorization, odor detection, and/or odor

masking/deodorization equipment in Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina; and

• Supplemental odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/deodorization

equipment, at various meter stations, and valve sites in North Carolina and South

Carolina.

Should the FERC certificate the Project and upon receipt of necessary permits and

authorizations, Transco anticipates construction of the Project would commence in June 2016 to

meet an in-service date of July 1, 2017.

1.1 PROPOSED FACILITIES

1.1.1 Purpose and Need Transco proposes to construct, install, and operate the Project facilities to provide

incremental 1.7 MMDt/d of year-round firm transportation service from northern Pennsylvania to

markets along the Transco Mainline system in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States,

to as far south as the Transco Station 85 Pooling Point in Choctaw County, Alabama.

The Project will include certain incremental greenfield pipelines and aboveground

facilities that will provide transportation service from various points from northern Susquehanna

County, Pennsylvania and along the existing Transco Leidy Line system. The Project will also

include modifications to the existing Transco Mainline system and aboveground facilities along

this system to provide bi-directional flow (new north to south capabilities).

Transco held an Open Season for the Project from August 8, 2013, to September 27,

2013, and has executed long-term, binding agreements with nine shippers for 100 percent of

the firm transportation capacity as detailed in Table 1.1-1. Subsequently, Transco held a

Supplemental Open Season from February 21, 2014, to March 14, 2014, that did not result in

any additional subscribed capacity.

A review of the Annual Energy Outlook 2013 (Energy Information Administration [EIA]

2013) reference case indicates that natural gas consumption will rise from 24.4 trillion cubic feet

(Tcf) in 2011 to 28.7 Tcf in 2035 (about 2.1 Tcf more than in the EIA 2012 reference case) and

will continue to grow to 29.5 Tcf in 2040. These statistics are consistent with the needs

expressed in Transco’s binding precedent agreements that have been signed for this additional

capacity (see Table 1.1-1).


1-3

Table 1.1-1 Transco’s Customers and Transportation Capacity Subscribed to the

Project

Shipper Transportation Contract Quantity Dth/d

Anadarko Energy Services Company 44,048

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation 850,000

Chief Oil & Gas LLC 420,000

Inflection Energy LLC 26,429

MMGS Inc. 22,024

Seneca Resources Corporation 189,405

Southern Company Services 60,000

Southwestern Energy Services Company 44,048

WGL Midstream Inc. 44,048

Total 1,700,002 Key: Dth/d = dekatherms per day

In meeting this contracted demand for natural gas, the Project will provide access to new

sources of domestic natural gas supply, and will support the overall reliability of the energy

infrastructure. The Project is fully contracted for and is consistent with the Commission’s

Statement of Policy on the Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities.

1.1.2 Location and Description of Facilities Figure 1.1-1 is a regional location map of the Project facilities. Attachment A includes

aerial and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map excerpts, respectively, showing the

proposed pipeline routes and compressor station option locations as currently identified.

Summaries of the proposed facilities for the Project are provided in Tables 1.1-2, 1.1-3, and

1.1-4.

1.1.2.1 Pipeline Facilities The Project will include two new greenfield pipelines; two pipeline loops; and pipeline

replacements. Table 1.1-2 includes a summary of the proposed pipeline and milepost (MP)

designations within each township, county, and state (see Figure 1.1-1). All MPs starting with

“L” refer to locations along the existing Transco Leidy Line system.

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

PA

DEMD

STA. 520 STA. 517

STA. 515

STA. 200

STA. 195

STA. 535

STA. 190VASTA. 185

ELK

YORK

CENTRE

BERKS

LYCOMING

SUSSEX

TIOGA

KENT

INDIANA

CLINTON

BEDFORD

BUTLER

LUZERNE

SOMERSET

CLEARFIELD

BLAIR

RANDOLPH

POTTER

FAYETTE

WAYNECRAWFORD

HARDY

PERRY

LANCASTER

CHESTER

MERCERPIKE

CAMBRIA

ADAMS

VENANGO

MONROE

CLARION

GARRETT

GREENE

PRESTON

GRANT

MCKEAN

HUNTINGDON BUCKS

SCHUYLKILL

BRADFORD

WASHINGTON

ALLEGHENY

WESTMORELAND

DAUPHIN

CECIL

FREDERICK

PAGE

JEFFERSON

BEAVER

WARREN

FULTON

PENDLETON

FOREST

ROCKINGHAM

MIFFLIN

HAMPSHIRE

BALTIMORE

TUCKER

ARMSTRONG

SALEM

UNION

JUNIATA

SULLIVAN

FAIRFAX

CARROLL

COLUMBIA

CHARLES

LEHIGH

CARBON

HARFORD

WYOMING

UPSHUR

ALLEGANY

CUMBERLAND

SNYDER

CAMERON

WEBSTER

MARION

LEBANON

MINERAL

FREDERICKHARRISON

SHENANDOAH

NEW CASTLE

LEWIS

DORCHESTERCULPEPER

BARBOUR

LACKAWANNA

MONTGOMERY

MONTGOMERY

LAWRENCE

CAROLINE

TALBOT

BERKELEY

POCAHONTAS

SUSQUEHANNA

CUMBERLAND

PRINCE GEORGES

HOWARD

MONONGALIA

MORGAN

MADISON

NORTHAMPTON

WARREN

NORTHUMBERLAND

WICOMICO

TAYLOR

CLARKEQUEEN ANNES

STAFFORDHIGHLAND

PRINCE WILLIAM

WARREN

GLOUCESTER

JEFFERSON

DELAWARE

RAPPAHANNOCK

MONTOUR

ST. MARYSAUGUSTA

CALVERT

CAMDEN

PHILADELPHIA

WETZEL

HUNTERDON

SULLIVAN

WORCESTER

BALTIMORE CITY

WASHINGTON

BRAXTON

GREENE

QUEEN ANNES

ARLINGTON

WINCHESTER

HARRISONBURG

KING GEORGE

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.APRIL 29, 2014

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROJECT LOCATION MAP

FIGURE 1.1-1

GAS PIPELINE

PROPOSED PROJECT SCOPEATLANTIC SUNRISE EXPANSION PROJECT (Case 5D8-1)

FACILITIES/MODIFICATIONS

MILEPOSTS

Mainline MP 1682.65 (River Road Tie-in) to MP L113.75(West Diamond)

MP L113.75 (West Diamond) to Zick CS at MP 55.79

MP L171.84 to MP L177.29

MP L119.87 to MP L128.87

Between Station 185 and the 180-20 valve site

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")130

135

140

145

150

155

160

165

170

175

167

180

185

190

195

VA

NC

SCGA

WV

MD

DC

KY

OH

TN

") EXISTING TRANSCO COMPRESSOR STATION

PROPOSED REPLACEMENTS

PROPOSED PIPELINES

EXISTING TRANSCO PIPELINE

URBAN AREAS :0 25 5012.5

Miles

0 125 25062.5Miles

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

(PO XXXX)

42" Central Penn Line South (1,480# MAOP)

30" Central Penn Line North (1,480# MAOP)

36" E Line GRUGAN LOOP

42" D Line UNITY LOOP

30" A & B Lines VIRGINIA Replacement

121.28

55.96

5.45

9.00

2.52

LENGTH IN MILESPIPELINE

STA. 517

1

2

3

109

4

11

12

13

6

14

15

7

16

17

1819

5

20

21

22

2324

25

25

25

8

1

2

20

FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY SUBJECT TO CHANGE

NTS

6) Station 605 - Construct a Greenfield compressor station around MP 53.9 with 2 x 15,000 HP electric compressor packages

7) Station 610 - Construct a Greenfield compressor station around MP 100.5 with 1 x 20,500 HP and 1 x 30,000 HP electric compressor packages

8) Receipt meter station at Owego

9) STA 520 - Add 1 ea. Solar Mars 100S (16,000 ISO HP ea.)

10) STA 520 - Compressor modifications to Units #6, #7 & #8

11) STA 517 - Add 1 ea. Solar Mars 100S (16,000 ISO HP ea.)

12) Receipt meter station at Zick

13) Interconnect at Springville pipeline crossing

14) Regulator station at Transco tie-in MP L92.7

15) Tie-in at 515L40 at MP L113.75 (West Diamond)

16) Regulator station at Transco tie-in MP L113.75 (West Diamond)

17) Regulator station at Transco MP 1682.65 (River Road) with tie-in to three mainlines 18) STA 190 - Modify valves and yard piping for southflow compression

19) STA 190 - Add 1 X 25,000HP electric compressor unit

20) STA 185 - Modify valves and yard piping for southflow compression


22) STA 160 - Modify valves yard piping,and regulation for southflow compression



25) Supplemental Odorization from Station 140 to Station 160 i. Odor masking / de-odorization of valves at valve sites for venting 11 valve sites ii. Odor masking / de-odorization of valves at 4 compressor stations (145, 150, 155, 160) iii. Odor Detection and supplemental odorization at 41 meter stations

25 25

Z:\7_MXD\Project Location Maps\Atlantic Sunrise Expansion Project Location Map 042914.mxdFIGURE 1.1-1 REV. 6


1-5

Table 1.1-2 Summary of Project Pipeline Facilities

Facility Type County Township/Town Length (miles)

Pennsylvania Pipeline Facilities

CPL North

30-inch pipeline

Columbia Sugarloaf 4.79

Luzerne

Fairmount 5.25

Ross 4.74

Lake 4.35

Lehman 3.05

Dallas 4.38

Wyoming

Monroe 0.61

Northmoreland 4.74

Eaton 2.36

Falls 2.92

Overfield 3.61

Clinton 4.30

Nicholson 4.23

Susquehanna Lenox 6.63

CPL North Total 55.96

CPL South

42-inch pipeline

Lancaster

Drumore 1.54

Martic 6.82

Conestoga 3.88

Manor 7.26

West Hampfield 4.94

East Donegal 4.53

Mount Joy 6.86

Lebanon

South Londonderry 4.79

South Annville 4.74

North Annville 0.12

Annville 0.15

North Annville 2.86

East Hanover 3.25

Union 10.82

Schuylkill

Pine Grove 6.03

Tremont 2.54

Frailey 1.74

Hegins 3.75

Eldred 3.52


1-6

Table 1.1-2 Summary of Project Pipeline Facilities

Facility Type County Township/Town Length (miles)

Northumberland

East Cameron 2.15

Coal 4.75

Ralpho 0.67

Columbia

Cleveland 4.64

Franklin 3.87

Montour 3.26

Hemlock 4.03

Mt Pleasant 5.24

Orange 0.21

Greenwood 5.39

Jackson 6.61

Sugarloaf 0.32

CPL South Total 121.28

Grugan Loop

36-inch pipeline Clinton Gallagher 5.45

Grugan Loop Total 5.45

Unity Loop

42-inch pipeline Lycoming

Jordan 1.57

Franklin 2.38

Penn 5.05

Unity Loop Total 9.00

Pennsylvania Subtotal 191.69

Virginia Pipeline Facilities

Mainline A & B Replacement

30-inch pipeline segments Prince William

Gainsville 0.02

Brentville

0.19

0.21

0.45

0.42

0.29

0.64

0.30

Virginia Subtotal 2.52

Project Total 194.21 Key: CPL = Central Penn Line


1-7

Table 1.1-3 Summary of Project New Aboveground Facilities

Facility ID Horsepower Township County State

Compressor Station 605 30,000 Lenox Susquehanna PA

Compressor Station 610 50,500 Hemlock Columbia PA

Receipt Meter Station at the existing Williams Zick Compressor Station N/A Lenox Susquehanna PA

Springville Interconnect N/A Nicholson Wyoming PA

Receipt Meter Station at Owego N/A Lenox Susquehanna PA

Regulator Station at Transco Tie-in MP L92.7

N/A

Lehman Luzerne PA

Regulator Station at Transco Tie-in MP L113.75 Sugarloaf Columbia PA

Regulator Station at Transco Mainline MP 1682.65 Drumore Lancaster PA Key: L = Leidy Line system milepost MP = milepost N/A = not applicable

Table 1.1-4

Summary of Project Modified Aboveground Facilities

Facility ID Facility Type Modifications Township County State

Compressor Station 520

Upgrade Existing Compressor Station

Additional compression 16,000-hp gas turbine; Re-wheeling of existing

Units 6, 7, and 8 Mifflin Lycoming PA


Upgrade Existing Compressor Station

Additional compression 16,000-hp gas turbine Jackson Columbia PA


Upgrade and Modify Existing Compressor

Station

Additional compression 25,000-hp electric motor-driven; Modify valves

and yard piping for bi-directional flow

West Friendship

District Howard MD


Modify Existing Compressor Station

Modify valves and yard piping for bi-directional flow

Gainsville District Prince William VA



Modify valves and yard piping for bi-directional flow

Falling River District Appomattox VA



Modify valves and yard piping for bi-directional flow; Odor masking/de-

odorization New Bethel Rockingham NC


Modify Existing Compressor Station Odor masking/de-odorization Reddy Creek Davidson NC




odorization Davidson Iredell NC




odorization Grover Cleveland NC

Key: hp = horsepower N/A = not applicable Note: Transco is proposing to modify 42 existing meter and regulator station for supplemental odorization, odor detection and odor masking, providing in Attachment B Table B-1.


1-8

Central Penn Line North Central Penn Line (CPL) North will consist of approximately 56.1 miles of new 30-inch

diameter pipeline in Pennsylvania with a maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of

1,480 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). This proposed pipeline will be co-located within or

adjacent to Transco’s Leidy Line pipeline right-of-way (ROW) for approximately 21.0 miles. CPL

North will commence near approximate MP L113.8 of the existing Transco Leidy Line pipeline in

Columbia County and continue east for approximately 21.0 miles along Transco’s Leidy Line A

ROW. Near approximate MP 21.0 in Luzerne County, the pipeline will turn northeast separating

from the existing Transco Leidy Line system continuing for approximately 35.1 miles through

Wyoming and Susquehanna counties, Pennsylvania to the proposed receipt meter station at the

existing Williams Zick Compressor Station in Susquehanna County. The existing Williams Zick

Compressor Station is owned and operated by Williams Midstream. Other areas of co-location

are provided in Table 1.2-2, in Section 1.2.

Central Penn Line South CPL South will consist of approximately 121.3 miles of new greenfield 42-inch diameter

pipeline in Pennsylvania with an MAOP of 1,480 psig. The pipeline is currently proposed to be

co-located within or adjacent to existing pipeline or electric transmission utility rights-of-way as

provided in Table 1.2-2, in Section 1.2 below. CPL South is currently proposed to commence

near approximate MP 1683.0 of the existing Transco Mainline system in Lancaster County and

will continue north through Lebanon, Schuylkill, Northumberland, and Columbia counties,

Pennsylvania, before reaching its terminus near approximate MP L113.8 of the existing Transco

Leidy Line pipeline.

Grugan Loop The Grugan Loop will consist of approximately 5.5 miles of 36-inch pipeline co-located

with the existing Transco Leidy Line between MPs L171.8 and L177.3 in Clinton County,

Pennsylvania. Once placed into operation, Transco will refer to the Grugan Loop as the Leidy

Line E.

Unity Loop The Unity Loop will consist of approximately 9.0 miles of 42-inch pipeline co-located with

The existing Transco Leidy Line pipeline between approximate MPs L119.9 and L128.9 in

Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. Once placed into operation, Transco will refer to the Unity

Loop as the Leidy Line D.


1-9

Mainline A & B Replacements Transco will replace various non-contiguous segments of its existing 30-inch Mainline A

and 30-inch Mainline B pipelines totaling approximately 2.5 miles between approximate MPs

1579.0 and 1582.0 in Prince William County, Virginia.

1.1.2.2 Aboveground Facilities New aboveground facilities and modifications to existing aboveground facilities along the

Project include:

• Two new greenfield compressor stations;


stations;

• Modifications at six additional existing compressor stations;

• Two new meter stations;

• Three new regulator stations; and

• Several new and modified appurtenant facilities, such as mainline valves (MLVs),

communication towers, and pig launchers and receivers.

Tables 1.1-3 and 1.1-4, and Figure 1.1-1 provide a summary, by location, of the new and

modified aboveground facilities.

1.1.2.2.1 Compressor Stations

Proposed New Compressor Stations Transco proposes to construct two new electric compressor stations:

• Compressor Station 605 in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania – two Solar

Mars 100S 15,000-horsepower (hp); electric motor-driven compressors; and

• Compressor Station 610 in Columbia County, Pennsylvania - one Solar Titan

250S 30,000-hp and one Solar Titan 130S 20,500-hp electric motor-driven

compressors.

Transco is currently assessing sites for the new compressor stations. Refer to the

Summary of Alternatives Considered for a discussion of options being considered. Transco

plans fee simple purchases of the lands ultimately chosen for construction and operation of the

proposed new compressor stations. Each compressor station will include the following facilities:

• A compressor building to house the compressors;


1-10

• Associated aboveground and buried suction/discharge piping;

• A power and control building;

• An office/warehouse building;

• A small drum storage building;

• A telecommunications building;

• Two aboveground storage tanks for condensate and oily water (one tank for

each; size/volume TBD);

• Station scrubbers (number TBD);

• Two unit blowdown stacks; one station blowdown stack;

• One natural gas-fired emergency generator unit (size to be determined); and

• Two electric utility air compressors with one air dryer.

Dependent upon the final location chosen for the facilities, local utility providers (if

available) will supply water and sewer connections, or if necessary Transco will construct an on-

site water well and sanitary sewer system (e.g., on-site septic). Each proposed compressor

station will each include a parking area and all-weather access roads. Transco is currently in

negotiations with local utility companies to supply electric power and communications circuits,

as discussed in Section 1.9.

Each new compressor station will be surrounded by a perimeter fence to provide secure

access to the site. The new compressor stations will be capable of full-time operation and

occupancy and will be designed for unattended operation via remote control from Transco’s Gas

Control located in Houston, Texas. Transco will install an emergency shutdown system at the

new compressor stations per 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 192. In addition, the

compressor stations will have a security system consisting of video cameras, door and fence

gate intrusion alarms, and coded and keyed access to the facility and its building doors. The

security systems will be monitored both by personnel at the station and also remotely by

Transco’s Gas Control. The outdoor lighting for the new compressor stations will be limited

during un-manned nighttime operation to the minimum amount required for security. The

security systems will incorporate outdoor video cameras that will create outdoor lighting

sufficient to record clear images at night. The main gates, yards, and all building entry and exit

doors will have lighting for security. These lights will have directional control, or they will be

positioned in a manner that minimizes their visibility in the direction of local residences.


1-11

Modifications to Existing Compressor Station Transco proposes to install additional horsepower/compression and other related

modifications at the following three existing compressor stations:

• Compressor Station 520 in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania – one new 16,000-

hp Solar Mars 100S gas turbine;

• Compressor Station 517 in Columbia County, Pennsylvania – one new 16,000-hp

Solar Mars 100S gas turbine; and

• Compressor Station 190 in Howard County, Maryland – one electric motor-driven

compressor unit rated at 25,000 hp; modification for bi-directional flow.

Installation of new horsepower units at these existing compressor stations may require

additional land requirements and workspace outside of the existing compressor station

footprints. (Transco is currently assessing these existing compressor stations to ensure minimal

environmental disturbance and maximum hydraulic performance and will provide a summary of

any additional land requirements with draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter

of 2014).

Transco also proposes to modify existing valves and piping for bi-directional flow (north

to south) and/or will add supplemental odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/

deodorization equipment at six existing compressor stations along Transco’s Mainline system,

including:

• Compressor Station 185 in Prince William County, Virginia – bi-directional flow;

• Compressor Station 170 in Appomattox County, Virginia – bi-directional flow;

• Compressor Station 160 in Rockingham County, North Carolina – bi-directional

flow, odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/deodorization;

• Compressor Station 155 in Davidson County, North Carolina – odorization, odor

detection, and odor masking/deodorization;

• Compressor Station 150 in Iredell County, North Carolina – bi-directional flow,

odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/deodorization; and

• Compressor Station 145 in Cleveland County, North Carolina – bi-directional

flow, odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/deodorization.

1.1.2.2.2 Meter Stations, Regulator Stations, and Pig Launcher and Receivers Transco proposes to construct two meter stations and three regulator stations with

interconnecting piping along the proposed CPL North and CPL South pipelines. Table 1.1-5


1-12

provides a summary of the proposed meter stations and regulator stations design specifications.

The Project design also incorporates pig launcher and/or receivers at three of these facilities as

provided in Table 1.1-5 to accommodate internal inspection of the proposed pipelines.

The typical construction layout drawings for the meter stations and regulator stations are

provided in [Attachment TBD] (Transco will submit typical construction layout drawings for the

meter station and regulator stations with draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th

quarter of 2014).

Table 1.1-5 Summary of Project New Meter and Regulator Station Design Specifications

Facility ID Milepost Design

Capacity (Dth/d)

MAOP (psig)

Hydrostatic Test Requirements

Design Factor Township County/

State

Receipt Meter Station at Zick with pig launcher

CPL North 55.8 850,000 1,480 1.5 x MAOP 0.5 Lenox Susquehanna

Receipt Meter Station at Owego TBD 850,000 1,480 1.5 x MAOP 0.5 Lenox Susquehanna

Regulator Station at Transco Tie-in L92.7 850,000 1,480 1.5 x MAOP 0.5 Lehman Luzerne

Regulator Station with pig launcher and receiver

L113.8 1,700,000 1,480 1.5 x MAOP 0.5 Sugarloaf Columbia

Regulator Station with pig receiver

Transco Mainline 1682.7

1,700,000 1,480 1.5 x MAOP 0.5 Drumore Lancaster

Key: CPL = Central Penn Line Dth/d = dekatherms per day L = Leidy Line system milepost MAOP = maximum allowable operating pressure psig = pounds per square inch gauge

Each meter station and regulator station will consist of unmanned facilities enclosed by a

chain-link fence, a facility building, associated above and below-ground piping, and valve

fixtures to tie in to the proposed CPL pipelines. These facilities will not require the installation of

individual septic systems or tie-ins to municipal sewer treatment facilities. Transco will construct

the facility buildings on poured concrete slab foundations and the balance of the yard inside the

facility fence-line will consist of crushed stone.

The pig trap design will comply with CFR 49 Part 192, “Company Specification and

Standards for Pipeline Launcher and Receiver Assemblies,” and other applicable safety and


1-13

environmental regulations. The pig traps also will be designed with dimensions adequate to

accommodate in-line inspection tools. The launcher/receiver facilities will consist of

aboveground trap valves, side valves, kicker valves, and other associated safety and isolation

piping and valves. In addition, the launchers/receivers will be installed within or immediately

adjacent to Transco’s rights-of-way and will include gravel bases, site access, chain-link fence

enclosures for security purposes, and identification and emergency signage.

The design pressure of the pig launchers/receivers will have an MAOP of 1,480 psig,

and the facilities will include:

• Launcher/receiver barrel assembly, complete with American Society of

Mechanical Engineers (ASME)-stamped quick-opening closures;

• Pig passage indicators;

• Pig trap isolation valve complete with actuator and power gas piping;

• Block-valve blowdown assembly;

• Side valve complete with actuator and power-gas piping;

• Barrel blowdown assembly;

• Kicker line/drawdown line;

• Drain lines;

• Associated piping and valves;

• Pipe supports, piers, and clamps;

• Protective coatings for both aboveground and below-ground piping;

• Full bore pig trap isolation-valves on Transco’s Mainline; and

• Barred tees on branch connections where applicable.

Additionally supplemental odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/deodorization

will occur at 42 meter and regulator stations as detailed in Attachment B, Table B-1.

1.1.2.2.3 Main Line Valves Transco will install new MLV assemblies at multiple TBD locations along the proposed

pipelines. Table 1.1-6 provides locations and other information for the MLV assemblies

associated with the Project. (Transco will provide detailed information regarding the design and

locations of each MLV in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)


1-14

Table 1.1-6 Summary of Project Mainline Valves

Facility ID Milepost Design

Capacity (Dth/d)

Design Pressure

(psig)

Design Factor Township County/

State

CPL North TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

CPL South TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Grugan Loop TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Unity Loop TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Key: CPL = Central Penn Line Dth/d = dekatherms per day psig = pounds per square inch gauge

All MLVs and pig trap bypass valves installed on the Project, including the valves that

function as pig trap isolation valves, will have remote control functionality. To limit environmental

and landowner impacts, installation of appurtenant aboveground facilities will occur within or

immediately adjacent to the proposed permanent rights-of-way.

1.1.3 Location Maps, Detailed Site Maps, and Plot/Site Maps Figure 1.1-1 shows the regional location of the Project facilities. Attachment A includes

aerial and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map excerpts, respectively, showing the

proposed pipeline routes and compressor station option locations as currently identified.

Specifically, the maps depict the 600-foot-wide study corridor for the greenfield pipelines and

the pipeline loops. Transco will start field surveys within these corridors in May 2014 to identify

the proposed pipeline centerlines and facilities locations.

1.2 LAND REQUIREMENTS The workspaces for the Project will include temporary construction rights-of-way,

additional temporary workspace (ATWS), permanent rights-of-way, access roads, and

contractor/pipe yards. Only the permanent rights-of-way and access roads will be maintained

during operation of the Project.

Construction of the Project will require the use of a total of approximately [TBD] acres of

land, resulting in both temporary and permanent land disturbance. Following construction,

approximately [TBD] acres of land consisting of those areas necessary to facilitate construction,

including construction rights-of-way, staging areas, ATWS, and temporary access roads will be

restored to pre-construction conditions. Permanent impact areas will include those necessary

for operation of the proposed new and modified facilities and any new permanent access roads.


1-15

(Transco is currently refining the pipeline routes and will provide acreages associated with land

requirements in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014 with draft RR 1 and draft RR 8.)

1.2.1 Pipeline Facilities Land requirements for the proposed pipeline facilities are summarized in Table 1.2-1.

(Transco is currently refining the pipeline routes and will provide acreages associated with land

requirements in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014 with draft RR 1 and draft RR 8.) Construction of

the pipeline facilities will require acquisition of temporary (construction) workspaces and

permanent (operational) easements along the entire length of each pipeline route at locations

identified in the mapping supplement. (Transco is currently refining the pipeline routes and will

submit aerial, photo-based alignment sheets for the pipeline routes in the 3rd or 4th quarter of

2014 with draft RR 1.) Typical ROW cross-section diagrams depicting the proposed construction

and permanent rights-of-way and overlap with co-located rights-of-way, as applicable, are

provided in Attachment C.

Table 1.2-1 Summary of Land Requirements for Project Pipeline Facilities

Pipeline Facility

Land Affected during Construction (acres)a Land Affected during Operations (acres)b

Within Existing Maintained/Operational Easementc

Outside Existing Maintained/Operational Easementc


Outside Existing Maintained/

Operational Easement (New Permanent

Impact)c

Pennsylvania

CPL North

Pipeline TBD TBD TBD TBD

ATWS TBD TBD TBD TBD

Catholic Protectiond TBD TBD TBD TBD

Access Roads TBD TBD TBD TBD

Contractor Staging Areas TBD TBD TBD TBD

Contractor Pipe Storage Areas TBD TBD TBD TBD

CPL North Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

CPL South






1-16


Pipeline Facility







Impact)c



CPL South Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

Grugan Loop







Grugan Loop Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

Unity Loop



Catholic Protection TBD TBD TBD TBD




Unity Loop Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

Pennsylvania Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

Virginia

Mainline A and B Lines Replacement







1-17


Pipeline Facility







Impact)c


Virginia Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

Pipeline Facilities Total TBD TBD TBD TBD

Notes: a All areas required for construction including areas that will be identified as operational right-of-way after Project completion. b Acreages are included within the reported acreage for “Land Affected During Construction.” c Refers to existing operational easement of existing Transco pipelines rights-of-way. d Temporary and permanent footprint required only if it is determined pipeline rights-of-way are not sufficient. Key: ATWS = Additional Temporary Workspace CPL = Central Penn Line

Transco proposes to utilize the following rights-of-way during construction of the pipeline

facilities:

• A 100-foot-wide construction ROW for installation of the 42-inch diameter

greenfield CPL South pipeline;

• A 90-foot-wide construction ROW for installation of the 30-inch diameter

greenfield CPL North pipeline; and a 90 foot-wide construction ROW for

installation of the 36-inch diameter Grugan pipeline looping. Of this, Transco will

utilize 30 feet of its existing Leidy Line rights-of-way during construction and is

further requesting the use of an additional 60 feet of new construction

workspace;

• A 100 foot-wide construction ROW for installation of the 42-inch diameter Unity

pipeline looping. Of this, Transco will utilize 35 feet of its existing Leidy Line

system easements during construction and is requesting the use of an additional

65 feet of new construction workspace; and

• Transco will utilize its existing Mainline system easements for the Mainline A and

B replacements.


1-18

In order to minimize the Project footprint, Transco proposes to co-locate or be adjacent

to existing utility corridors as feasible. CPL North is co-located for approximately 47 percent with

the existing Transco Leidy Line system, Williams Midstream pipelines, electrical powerline

ROW, and ROW types yet to be determined. CPL South is co-located for approximately 17

percent with Transco’s Leidy Line system, powerlines, and ROW types yet to be determined.

The Grugan Loop and Unity Loop pipelines are 100 percent co-located with the Transco Leidy

Line system. The summary of locations where the pipelines are co-located is detailed in Table

1.2-2.

Transco proposes the construction rights-of-way to provide for safe and efficient

construction of large diameter pipeline facilities in accordance with Occupational Safety and

Health Administration regulations (29 CFR 1926.650-1926.652, Subpart P) and Interstate

Natural Gas Association of America’s (INGAA) workspace guidelines (INGAA 1999). Reductions

or “neck-downs” of the construction ROW may be necessary at various locations to address

specific environmental or residential issues along the proposed pipeline. A 75-foot-wide

construction ROW or less will be used in wetlands with the exception of the requested site-

specific deviations from the FERC Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation

Procedures (FERC 2013) as detailed in Section 1.3.6 and in RR 2. (Transco anticipates

submitting draft RR 2 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Transco proposes to maintain a 50-foot-wide permanent ROW along the greenfield

portions of the CPL North and CPL South pipeline routes to accommodate operational

inspections, maintenance, and prohibit encroachment. Transco proposes to maintain additional

25-foot-wide permanent rights-of-way along the proposed pipeline loops and portions of CPL

North that will be co-located with the Transco Leidy Line system.

Areas disturbed by construction that are not part of the permanent rights-of-way will be

restored following the completion of construction activities per landowner and applicable agency

requests. Permanent rights-of-way will be restored to pre-construction contours; however, they

will be maintained in an herbaceous state for the operational life of the pipelines.


1-19

Table 1.2-2 Summary of Co-location of Pipeline Facilities for the Project

Co-location with Existing Rights-of-way Begin MP End MP Total Co-located

miles

CPL North

Transco Leidy Line System 0.00 21.00 21.00

Unknown ROWa 24.35 24.55 0.20

Williams Midstream Pipeline 29.75 33.55 3.80

Powerline 40.10 40.20 0.10




Total CPL North 26.25

CPL South

Transco’s Mainline 0.00 0.10 0.10

Powerline 5.65 10.60 4.95

Powerline 14.80 19.60 4.80

Powerline 21.55 24.55 3.00

Powerline 35.50 36.00 0.50

Unknown ROWa 76.00 77.90 1.90

Powerline 79.80 81.13 1.33

Powerline 94.60 100.10 5.50

Unknown ROWa 100.10 100.20 0.10

Total CPL South 21.18

Grugan Loop

Transco Leidy Line System L171.84 L177.29 5.45

Total Grugan Loop 5.45

Unity Loop

Transco Leidy Line System L119.87 L128.87 9.00

Total Unity Loop 9.00 Notes: a Transco is currently investigating “Unknown ROW” areas to determine utility ownership. These

areas will be defined in draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014. Key: CPL = Central Penn Line L = Leidy Line system milepost MP = milepost


1-20

1.2.2 Aboveground Facilities Land requirements for the aboveground facilities associated with the Project are

summarized in Table 1.2-3 and described below. (Transco is currently refining the facility

designs and will provide acreages associated with land requirements in the 3rd or 4th quarter of

2014 with draft RR 1 and RR 8.)

New Compressor Stations Compressor Station 605 and Compressor Station 610 will each require approximately 30

acres of construction workspace of which approximately 10 acres will be permanently

maintained for operation. Plot plans for the compressor stations are provided in [Attachment

TBD]. (Transco is currently refining the facility designs and will submit plot plans with the revised

draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Modified Compressor Stations

Upgraded Existing Compressor Stations Construction associated with the upgrading at Compressor Stations 517, 520, and 190

may require construction workspace outside of the current disturbed area of the facilities;

although disturbances are anticipated to be located entirely within Transco-owned property. Plot

plans for the proposed modifications to the existing compressor stations are provided in

[Attachment TBD]. (Transco is currently refining the facility designs and will submit plot plans

and land requirements with draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Other Modified Existing Compressor Stations Construction associated with modifications at Compressor Stations 185, 170, 165, 155,

150, and 145 are not anticipated to require construction workspace outside of the current

disturbed area of the facilities and all disturbances will be located entirely within Transco-owned

property. Plot plans for the proposed modifications to the existing compressor stations are

provided in [Attachment TBD]. (Transco is currently refining the facility designs and will submit

plot plans and land requirements with draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter

of 2014.)

Meter Stations, Regulator Stations, and Pig Launcher and Receivers Construction of the meter stations will require a total of [TBD] acres of workspace with

approximately [TBD] acres permanently maintained for operation. Construction of the regulator

stations will require a total of [TBD] acres of workspace with approximately [TBD] acres


1-21

permanently maintained for operation. Construction of the pig launchers and receivers will

require a total of [TBD] acres of workspace with approximately [TBD] acres permanently

maintained for operation. (Transco is currently refining the facility designs and will submit

acreages in draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

MLVs, Cathodic Protection, and Other Ancillary Facilities Construction of the MLVs and other ancillary facilities will be wholly located within the

permanent pipeline rights-of-way. Construction of cathodic protection will be located to the

extent feasible within the construction ROW of the associated pipelines and will only require

additional temporary and permanent footprint if it is determined pipeline rights-of-way are not

sufficient.

Table 1.2-3 Land Requirements for Project Aboveground Facilities

Facility ID Approximate Milepost

Township/ County

Land Affected During

Construction (acres)b


Operation (acres)b

Pennsylvania

New Compressor Station 605 TBD Lenox, Susquehanna County TBD TBD

New Compressor Station 610 TBD Hemlock, Columbia County TBD TBD

Compressor Station 517 MP L115.2 Jackson, Columbia County TBD TBD

Compressor Station 520 MP L69.0 Mifflin, Columbia County TBD TBD

Receipt Meter Station at Zick CPL North MP 55.8 Lenox, Susquehanna TBD TBD

Springville Interconnect TBD Nicholson, Wyoming TBD TBD

Receipt Meter Station at Owego TBD Lenox, Susquehanna TBD TBD

Regulator Station MP L92.7 Lehman, Luzerne TBD TBD

Regulator Station MP L113.8 Sugarloaf, Columbia TBD TBD

Regulator Stationa Transco Mainline MP 1682.7 Drumore, Lancaster TBD TBD

Maryland

Compressor Station 190 Transco Mainline MP 1628.8

West Friendship, Howard County TBD TBD

Virginia


Gainsville District, Prince William County TBD TBD


Falling River District, Appomattox County TBD TBD


1-22

Table 1.2-3 Land Requirements for Project Aboveground Facilities

Facility ID Approximate Milepost

Township/ County


Construction (acres)b


Operation (acres)b

North Carolina

Compressor Station 160 Mainline MP 1369.40 New Bethel, Rockingham County TBD TBD

Compressor Station 155 Mainline MP 1326.10 Reddy Creek, Davidson County TBD TBD

Compressor Station 150 Mainline MP 1287.10 Davidson, Iredell County TBD TBD

Compressor Station 145 Mainline MP 1247.00 Blacksburg CCD, Cleveland County TBD TBD

Aboveground Facilities Total TBD TBD Notes: a Include pig launcher and/or receiver b Acreages are approximate Key: CCD = Census County Division L = Leidy Line system milepost MP = Milepost

1.2.3 Contractor and Pipe Yards During construction of the pipeline facilities, off-ROW areas for the storage of pipe and

equipment will be required. These contractor and pipe yards will be located at various points in

the vicinity of the Project, at locations with convenient and safe access to the pipeline routes.

Contractor and pipe yards identified for the Project are listed in Table 1.2-4. (Transco is

currently refining land requirements for proposed contractor and pipe yards and will submit land

requirements with the draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Table 1.2-4 Project Contractor and Pipe Yards

Name/Purpose Approximate Milepost

Township/ County

Construction Year Size (acres) Comment

Pennsylvania

TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Project Total TBD TBD


1-23

Contractor and pipe yards needed for the Project will total approximately [TBD] acres.

The yards will be used for equipment, pipe, and material storage, as well as temporary field

offices and pipe preparation/field assembly areas. Site selection and acquisition will continue

throughout the planning and permitting stages of the Project. All areas used for staging

throughout the Project will be restored upon Project completion unless otherwise agreed with

the landowner and submitted to FERC for review and approval. The maps that depict the

locations of the contractor and pipe yards are provided in [Attachment TBD]. (Transco will

submit aerial, photo-based alignment sheets with locations of contractor and pipe yards with the

draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.2.4 Access Roads Transco will utilize existing and new roads to access Project workspaces. A total of

[TBD] temporary access roads and [TBD] permanent access roads will be necessary to

construct the Project. Temporary access roads will be utilized during the construction phase of

the Project but will be restored to pre-construction conditions following Project completion.

Permanent access roads will be maintained by Transco for the life of the respective facility.

Land requirements for access roads are summarized in Table 1.2-1. Access roads are

discussed in detail in RR 8. (Transco anticipates submitting draft RR 8 in the 3rd or 4th quarter

of 2014.)

1.2.5 Additional Temporary Workspace Typically, pipeline construction requires ATWS at road, railroad, wetland, and waterbody

crossing locations and for areas where the contractor utilizes specialized construction

techniques, including steep slopes, blasting (if required), and agricultural land. The

configurations and sizes of ATWS areas are site-specific and vary in accordance with the

construction methodology, crossing type, and other construction needs. Descriptions of the

specialized construction techniques typically requiring ATWS are provided in Section 1.3.3.

ATWS land requirements are summarized in Table 1.2-1. ATWS locations are discussed in

detail in RR 8. (Transco anticipates submitting ATWS with justification in draft RR 8 in the 3rd or

4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND PROCEDURES Transco will design, construct, test, operate, and maintain all Project facilities to conform

with applicable regulations, including U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) regulations in

49 CFR Part 192, Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety


1-24

Standards, and Commission regulations at 18 CFR Section 380.15: Siting and Maintenance

Requirements. In addition, unless otherwise authorized through a modification granted by

FERC, Transco will comply with the FERC Plan and FERC Procedures.

Transco is requesting approval of a Project-specific Plan and Procedures. Modifications

to the FERC’s Plan and Procedures are provided in Table 1.3-1. (Specific modification requests

will be submitted with Transco’s draft RRs anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of

2014.)

Table 1.3-1 Summary of Project Proposed Modifications to FERC Plan and Procedures

FERC Measure

Description of Alternative Measure and/or Proposed

Modification to FERC Measure

Justification for Alternative Measure and/or Proposed

Modification to FERC Measure

Explanation of how Alternative Measure

and/or Proposed Modification Provides Comparable Level of Mitigation as FERC

Measure

TBD TBD TBD TBD

TBD TBD TBD TBD

Key: FERC = Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Site specific deviations from the FERC Plan and Procedures are discussed in each RR,

as applicable. Transco’s Plan and Procedures are provided in the Environmental Compliance

Plan (ECP) provided in [Attachment TBD]. In addition to the Transco Plan and Procedures, the

Project-specific ECP incorporates other Project-specific construction and compliance plans, as

applicable. This includes but is not limited to:

Transco Plan

Transco Procedures

Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD) Contingency Plan

Spill Containment and Control Plan

Transco Unanticipated Discovery of Contamination Plan

Transco Unanticipated Discovery Plan for Cultural Resources

Project-specific Blasting Plan

Project-specific Residential Construction Plans

(Transco will provide its Project-specific Plan and Procedures and its ECP for review by

the FERC with its draft RRs anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)


1-25

1.3.1 Construction Schedule If approved by FERC and upon receipt of all necessary authorizations and permits,

Transco anticipates mobilization and construction of the Project facilities in June 2016.

Construction of the proposed facilities is anticipated to be completed to meet an in-service date

of July 1, 2017.

1.3.2 General Pipeline Construction Procedures The general procedures for pipeline construction are described in this section. Transco

will use conventional techniques for buried pipeline construction to ensure safe, stable, and

reliable transmission facilities, consistent with Commission and USDOT specifications.

Construction of the proposed pipelines will follow a set of sequential operations, unique to the

pipeline industry, as further described below and reflected in Figure 1.3-1. The Project will

require multiple construction spreads that will proceed along the pipeline rights-of-way in one

continuous operation. The entire process will be coordinated in such a manner as to minimize

the total time a tract of land is disturbed and, therefore, susceptible to erosion and/or temporarily

precluded from its normal use.

Areas requiring special construction plans and techniques may include road or utility

crossings, waterbodies and wetlands, unusual topographies associated with unstable soils and

trench conditions, residential or urban areas, agricultural areas, areas requiring rock removal,

and permanent recreation facilities, among others. Construction procedures associated with

these areas are discussed in Section 1.3.3.

Transco is undertaking a comprehensive routing process to mark the centerline of the

CPL North and CPL South pipelines to minimize impacts as feasible along the route. This is

being accomplished by individual routing teams comprised of land, engineering, and

environmental specialists evaluating a 600-foot-wide corridor for placement of the centerline.

Resource and land use areas of environmental concern (e.g., stream, wetlands, sensitive

species habitats, and residences) are being avoided to the maximum extent possible, while

engineering design factors are considered. Survey crews will begin marking the centerline of

Transco’s proposed pipelines in May 2014 on those properties where landowner access has

been granted. Crews will mark the centerlines at frequent intervals, as well as at known

crossings of foreign lines and utilities, at road crossings, and at points of inflection.

How Williams Builds PipelinesHow Williams Builds Pipelines

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8

1. Pre-construction surveyBefore construction begins, Williams surveys environmental features along proposed pipeline segments. Utility lines and agricultural drainages are located and marked to prevent accidental damage during pipeline construction. The pipeline’s centerline and the exterior right of way and workspace is staked.

2. Clearing and gradingThe pipeline right of way is cleared of vegeta-tion. Temporary erosion control measures are installed prior to any earth-moving activities.

3. TrenchingTopsoil is removed from the work area and stockpiled in agricultural areas. Williams then uses backhoes and trenching machines to excavate the trench. The soil that is excavated during ditching operations is temporarily stockpiled on the right of way.

4. Pipe stringing and bendingIndividual joints of pipe are strung along the right of way adjacent to the excavated ditch and arranged so they are accessible to construction personnel. A mechanical pipe-bending machine bends individual joints of pipe to the desired angle at locations where there are significant changes in the natural ground contours or where the pipeline route changes direction.

5. Welding, pipe coating and x-ray inspectionAfter the stringing and bending are complete, the pipe sections are aligned, welded together, and placed on temporary supports along the edge of the trench. All welds are then x-rayed. Line pipe requires a coating at the welded joints. The entire pipe coating is then electronically inspected.

6. Lowering pipe in and backfillingThe pipe assembly is lowered into the trench by sideboom tractors. The trench is backfilled. No foreign materials are allowed in the trench.

7. TestingAfter backfilling, the pipe is filled with water and pressure tested. Tested water is obtained and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations.

8. RestorationWilliams’ policy is to clean up and restore the work area as soon as possible. Disturbed areas are restored, as nearly as possible, to their original contours. Temporary environmental control measures are maintained until the area is restored, as closely as possible, to its original condition.

© 2010 The Williams Companies, Inc. Figure 1.3-1 Construction Sequence


1-27

1.3.2.1 Surveying and Staking Affected landowners will be notified prior to pre-construction surveys and staking.

Following these notifications, a crew will survey and stake the outside limits of the proposed

construction rights-of-way and ATWSs, the centerline of the pipeline and drainages, highway

and railroad crossings, and access roads. Existing utility lines (e.g., cables, conduits, and

pipelines) will be located and marked with flags, stakes, or other devices to prevent accidental

damage during pipeline construction.

Environmental survey crews following the routing crews will mark resource areas,

including wetland boundaries, cultural resource sites, and rare species habitat, as applicable,

with appropriate fencing, signage, and/or flagging, based on environmental and archaeology

surveys and environmental permit conditions.

1.3.2.2 Erosion and Sediment Control Following the establishment of workspace boundaries, Transco will install temporary soil

erosion and sediment control measures along the proposed construction ROW, ATWS areas,

access roads, and other work areas, as applicable, in accordance with Transco’s ECP. The best

management practices (BMPs) presented in the ECP will minimize erosion of disturbed soils

and prevent the transportation of sediment outside of the construction ROW into

environmentally sensitive areas, such as wetlands and waterbodies.

Immediately following clearing of the construction ROW, Transco will install appropriate

temporary erosion controls. Typically, staked straw bales and/or silt fence barriers are

positioned along the limit of wetland boundaries within the construction workspace. To ensure

that appropriate erosion and sediment control measures are maintained until the construction

workspace is fully stabilized, the Environmental Inspector (EI) will inspect all disturbed areas of

the construction spread(s) (e.g., construction ROW, pipe storage yards, and temporary

contractor yards) that have not been permanently stabilized. Inspections will occur in

accordance with the following schedule: 1) on a daily basis in areas of active construction; 2) on

a weekly basis in areas with no construction or equipment operation; or 3) within 24 hours of a

storm event that is 0.5 inches or greater.

1.3.2.3 Clearing, Grading, and Fencing The construction corridor will be cleared and graded to remove vegetation, brush, trees,

roots, and other obstructions, such as large rocks and stumps. The ROW will be graded, where

necessary, to create a level workspace to for allow safe construction conditions. Grading will be


1-28

limited in wetland resource areas. Temporary fences and gates will be installed, as needed. No

cleared material will be placed within wetland areas.

Activity related to the storage of materials adjacent to wetland and waterbody locations

will be limited to the temporary placement of cleared vegetation, permitted construction

equipment and materials, as well as spoils generated from trenching operations. The placement

of these materials in these locations will be temporary and all materials (excluding installed

erosion control devices) will be removed prior to restoration.

Transco will clear the ROW of vegetation using mechanical means to the extent

practicable, which may include feller-bunchers, hydro-axes, forwarders, skidders, and other

appropriate equipment. Clearing by hand with chainsaws may be implemented where specific

safety or environmental concerns warrant.

Disposal of trees cleared from the ROW may be accomplished using several different

methods. Trees, if suitable, may be taken off site by the clearing contractor and used for timber.

Trees may be chipped on site and removed. Chipped material not removed may be spread

across the ROW within upland areas in a manner that does not inhibit revegetation. Wood chips

will not be left within agricultural lands or wetlands. Also, wood chips will not be stockpiled in a

manner that could result in transport into a wetland.

Should individual landowners wish to utilize the trees cleared from the ROW, the timber

will be cut to manageable lengths and neatly stacked at the edge of the ROW in areas identified

by the EI prior to the commencement of clearing activities and directly accessible to the

landowner, in accordance with individual landowner agreements. Timber will be stacked along

the ROW only at the specific request of a landowner, under the condition that it is in an already

cleared upland area that will be accessible to the landowner without disturbing the restored

ROW. Timber not designated for other uses will be disposed of by Transco’s contractor at an

appropriate receiving facility (e.g., landfills, transfer stations, composting centers, and wood

product processors or purveyors). Timber will not be stacked in waterways or left within

wetlands.

Grading activities will be scheduled to minimize the time between initial clearing

operations and the actual installation of pipe. To the extent possible, access to the construction

corridor normally will be obtained via public roads that intersect the ROW; however, use of

existing private roads and construction of new access roads may also be required. Transco will


1-29

obtain permission from landowners for the use/improvement of access roads across their

property to the construction corridor.

Grading of the construction workspace will allow for the movement of heavy equipment

and the safe passage of work crews. Grading will include removing rock outcrops, tree stumps,

ridges and topographic irregularities. Generally, machinery will operate on one side of the trench

(working side) with excavated materials stockpiled on the other (non-working side).

As appropriate, the clearing and grading operations will incorporate special construction

procedures to minimize the amount of vegetation removed from stream banks and slopes,

prevent undue disturbance of the soil profile, restore the original contours of the natural ground,

and prevent topsoil erosion.

1.3.2.4 Trenching Track-mounted excavators will excavate the trench for the pipeline. Generally, the trench

will be approximately 14 to 24 inches wider than the depth of the pipe, depending upon the

nature of the substrate, with sufficient depth to allow for the minimum cover requirements to the

top of the pipeline, in accordance with USDOT regulations pursuant to the Natural Gas Pipeline

Safety Act of 1968.

Except as depicted on site-specific plans or as required by permit condition, the depth of

cover for the proposed pipeline will comply with Transco’s standard minimum specifications in

accordance with federal and/or state regulations, as applicable, as set forth in Table 1.3-2.

Transco will install the pipeline with a minimum of 36 inches of cover, except where rock

prevents this depth.

1.3.2.5 Pipe Stringing Steel pipe will be procured in nominal 40-foot and 80-foot lengths or joints and protected

with a fusion-bonded epoxy coating applied at the factory (the beveled ends will be left uncoated

for welding). Stringing operations involve moving pipe sections into position along the prepared

ROW. Pipe will be delivered to the Project’s pipeline yards, typically by truck. It will then be

trucked to approved construction workspaces. Individual joints of pipe will be strung along the

ROW parallel to the centerline and arranged so they are easily accessible to construction

personnel. The amount of pipe necessary for waterbody or road crossings will be typically

stockpiled in the approved ATWS near each crossing.


1-30

Table 1.3-2 Transco Standard Minimum Specifications for Pipeline Depth of Cover (inches)

Locationa Soil Consolidated Rock

USDOT PHMSA Class 1 36 24

USDOT PHMSA Class 2, 3, and 4 36 24

Land in Agriculture 36 - 48b N/A

USDOT Public Roads 60 N/A

Railroad crossings (in agreement with railroad company) 60 N/A

USACE Navigable river, stream, or harbor 60 N/A Notes: a As defined by USDOT PHMSA at 49 CFR 192.5.

Class 1: offshore areas and areas within 220 yards of a pipeline with ≤10 buildings intended for human occupancy. Class 2: areas within 220 yards of a pipeline with >10 but <46 buildings intended for human occupancy. Class 3: areas within 220 yards of a pipeline with ≥46 buildings intended for human occupancy and areas within 100 yards

of either a building or a small, well defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least five days per week for 10 weeks in any 12-month period.

Class 4: areas within 220 yards of a pipeline where buildings with four or more stories are prevalent. b Depending on landowner agreements Key: PHMSA = Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration USACE = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USDOT = U.S. Department of Transportation

1.3.2.6 Pipe Bending Bending of the pipe will be required to allow the pipeline to follow natural topographic

grade changes and direction changes of the ROW. For this purpose, prior to line-up and

welding, selected joints will be field-bent by track-mounted hydraulic bending machines. For

larger horizontal changes of direction, manufactured induction bends may be used.

Pipe bending in the field will be utilized for turns involving slight deflections and/or large

radii. For turns involving larger deflections and/or small radii, often related to spatial limitations

due to easement and topographic constraints, prefabricated elbow fitting (ells) will be utilized,

rather than pipe bending on site.

1.3.2.7 Pipe Assembly and Welding Following stringing and bending, the joints of pipe will be placed on temporary supports

adjacent to the trench. The ends will be carefully aligned and welded together using multiple

passes for a full penetration weld. Only welders qualified according to applicable American

National Standards Institute (ANSI), ASME, and American Petroleum Institute (API) Standards


1-31

will be permitted to perform the welding. A Transco-approved welding inspector will conduct the

welder qualification testing and document all test results. A welder failing to meet acceptance

criteria of the Williams Company Standard Welder Qualification Test will be disqualified.

Bending, welding, and coating in the field will comply with USDOT regulations (49 CFR Part

192).

1.3.2.8 X-Ray and Weld Repair To ensure that the assembled pipe meets or exceeds the design strength requirements

and to ensure weld quality and integrity, the welds will be inspected visually and tested non-

destructively using radiographic (x-ray) or another approved test method, in accordance with

API Standards. Welds displaying inclusions (void spaces) or other defects will be repaired, or

they will be cut out (removed) and new welds will be installed and retested.

1.3.2.9 Coating Field Welds, Inspection, and Repair Following welding, the previously uncoated ends of the pipe at the joints will be field-

coated with a Transco- and industry-approved anti-corrosion coating. Prior to lowering the pipe

into the trench, the coating on the entire pipe section will be inspected and any damaged areas

repaired.

1.3.2.10 Pipe Preparation and Lowering-In Once the pipeline has been welded together, coated, and inspected, the pipe will be

lowered into the trench. If the bottom of the trench is rocky, methods to protect the pipe will be

used, including sandbags or support pillows at designated intervals along the trench. Trench

dewatering may be required in certain locations to prevent the pipe from floating and to allow

certain limited activities to be performed in the trench. Trench dewatering will be performed in

accordance with Transco’s ECP.

1.3.2.11 Tie-Ins At select locations, such as waterbody crossings, road crossings, and terrain changes

along the pipeline system, the pipe will be lowered into the trench in segments. The segments

then will be welded together or tied-in prior to backfilling. A crew will be assigned to make these

tie-ins at designated locations ahead of the backfill operations.

1.3.2.12 Padding, Backfilling, and Grade Restoration After the pipe is lowered into the trench, the trench will be backfilled. Backfill usually

consists of the material originally excavated from the trench; however, in some cases, additional


1-32

backfill from other sources may be required. Transco will utilize a padding machine prior to

conventional backfilling operations. Use of this equipment will prevent rock material mixed with

subsoil from making direct contact with the pipeline. Padding operations are anticipated to

provide 6 inches of screened subsoil cover below and along the sides of the pipe, as well as

12 inches of screened subsoil cover above the pipe. Once the pipeline is adequately protected

with screened subsoil, conventional backfilling operations will occur. Any excess excavated

materials or materials unsuitable for backfill will be handled as approved by the landowner or

land management agency or disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. In areas

where topsoil has been segregated, the subsoil will be placed in the trench first, and then the

topsoil will be placed over the subsoil. Backfilling will occur to approximate grade; however, a

soil crown may be placed above the trench to accommodate any future soil settlement.

1.3.2.13 Clean-up and Restoration After the completion of backfilling, disturbed areas will be graded, and any remaining

trash and debris will be properly disposed of in compliance with applicable regulations. The

construction corridor will be protected by the implementation of permanent erosion control

measures, including site-specific contouring, slope breakers, mulching, and reseeding to

establish soil-holding vegetation. Contouring will be accomplished using acceptable excess soils

from construction. If sufficient soils are not available, additional soil will be imported by Transco

in accordance with applicable requirements.

Transco will restore the construction workspace in accordance with the Transco’s ECP,

using applicable seed mix recommendations from the Natural Resource Conservation Service

(NRCS) and consultation with applicable County Conservation Districts, or relevant landowner

agreements. Consultations regarding wetland- and waterbody-specific restoration activities are

planned with the PADEP and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).

Clean-up and restoration of Project locations will be conducted in accordance with the

procedures outlined in Transco’s ECP and applicable regulatory approvals. Transco will ensure

the BMPs detailed in the ECP are implemented by contractors during construction. Compliance

and non-compliance with these requirements will be recorded in the field by EIs, and details of

the activities will be documented in the weekly construction inspection reports, which will be

submitted to the FERC for review and comment.

For state-owned or managed lands crossed by the Project in Pennsylvania, Transco is

consulting with the Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) and Pennsylvania Department of


1-33

Conservation and Natural Resources (PADCNR) and other applicable agencies regarding post-

construction restoration requirements. Transco is working with these agencies to minimize

Project-related impacts on state-owned or managed lands.

1.3.2.14 Hydrostatic Testing The pipelines will be tested hydrostatically in accordance with USDOT regulations, 49

CFR Part 192. The pipeline will be filled with water and maintained at a test pressure for a

duration of 8 hours in compliance with Transco’s engineering standards and applicable federal

regulations. After the completion of a satisfactory test, the water will be discharged to the

ground through a containment structure to a vegetated upland area. The discharge rate of the

test water will be regulated using valves and energy dissipation devices to reduce the potential

for erosion. An inline caliper tool will be run through the entire length of the pipeline to verify

pipe geometry. RR 2 contains additional information regarding hydrostatic pressure testing of

the pipeline, including anticipated water volumes. (Transco anticipates submitting draft RR 2 in

the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3.2.15 Cathodic Protection and Alternating Current Mitigation Cathodic protection equipment needed for the pipeline will be determined during the

design phase of the Project. Where additional equipment is required, it is expected to consist of

rectifiers and anode beds, which are routinely located within the permanent ROW of the

pipeline. Even where subsurface conditions include rock and prevent deep well designs,

alternate designs that include multiple, shallower anode beds also have been contained within

the permanent pipeline ROW. In some cases, there may be a need for anode beds to be

located outside of the permanent ROW, but that determination cannot be made until the system

design is complete.

Transco will develop an Alternating Current (AC) Mitigation Plan for locations where the

Project is co-located with existing power lines. (Transco anticipates submitting its AC Mitigation

Plan with its Application in March 2015.) Information about any adjacent power lines will be

obtained from the utility company, including voltage levels, available fault current, and the

location of transformers. Special software modeling techniques then will be applied to predict

potential induced voltages and determine if mitigation measures are needed for safety and

cathodic protection.


1-34

1.3.3 Specialized Construction Procedures In addition to conventional pipeline construction techniques, specialized construction

techniques will be utilized in sensitive resource areas, including waterbody and wetland

crossings or in areas with construction constraints, such as residential areas, road and railroad

crossings, utility crossings, areas with side slopes, and rocky areas. Specialized construction

procedures are described below.

1.3.3.1 Trenchless Construction Methods Transco is evaluating two methods of trenchless construction: conventional horizontal

bore and HDD.

Conventional Horizontal Bore To complete a conventional horizontal bore, a pit on either side of the road will be

excavated to provide a working area for the equipment. A boring machine will be lowered into

one pit, and a horizontal hole will be bored to a diameter equal to the diameter of the pipe (or

casing, if required) at the depth of pipeline installation. The pipeline section will then be pushed

through the bore to the opposite pit. If additional pipeline sections are required to span the

length of the bore, they will be welded to the first section of the pipeline in the bore pit prior to

being pushed through. (The locations of proposed conventional horizontal bore will be provided

with draft RR 1 anticipated in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Horizontal Directional Drill The HDD method allows for trenchless construction across an area by drilling a hole

significantly below conventional pipeline depth, and pulling the pipeline through the pre-drilled

hole. HDD is typically used to install pipeline in areas where traditional open-cut excavations are

not feasible due to sensitive resource areas or logistical reasons. While overall disturbance

within a sensitive area may be minimized by HDD, a greater amount of equipment staging is

typically required. The amount of workspace at the drill entry and exit locations can vary

significantly based on site-specific conditions. The entry side of the drill usually consists of the

drilling rig and entry hole, control cab, drill string pipe storage, site office and storage trailers,

power generators, bentonite storage, bentonite slurry mixing equipment, slurry pump, cuttings

separation equipment, cutting return/settlement pit, water trucks and water storage, and the

heavy construction equipment necessary to support the operation.

The exit side consists of the exit hole and slurry containment pit, cuttings

return/settlement pit, cuttings separation and slurry reclamation equipment, drill string pipe


1-35

storage, and heavy construction equipment necessary to support the operation. In addition to

the drilling operations to be conducted within the exit side workspace, ATWS is often needed

adjacent to the construction ROW to provide a straight corridor for handling pipe at HDD

locations where the ROW changes direction. This allows the pipeline to be prefabricated into

one continuous section in preparation of the pull–back operation. Once assembled, the pipe is

placed on rollers so it may be conveyed into the drill hole.

To facilitate HDD, an electric guide wire coil is typically placed along the ground surface

between each HDD entry and exit point, where possible. This guide wire is used to assist in

tracking of the location of the down-hole drilling equipment and to determine steering inputs

during advancement of the pilot bore. Wireline guidance systems typically require two guide

wires for HDD crossings that parallel the centerline of an installation with a variable spacing or

offset on each side of the centerline, depending on the depth of the HDD installation.

Following the completion of the pilot hole, reaming tools will be utilized to enlarge the

hole to accommodate the pipeline diameter. The reaming tools will be attached to the drill string

at the exit point and will then be rotated and drawn back to incrementally enlarge the pilot hole.

During this process, drilling mud consisting of bentonite clay and water will be continuously

pumped into the pilot hole to remove cuttings and maintain the integrity of the hole. When the

hole has been sufficiently enlarged, a prefabricated segment of pipe will be attached behind the

reaming tool on the exit side of the crossing and pulled back through the drill hole towards the

drill rig. In the event that a particular drill is unsuccessful, Transco will implement its HDD

Contingency Plan, which is included in the ECP. (The locations of proposed HDDs will be

provided with the revised draft RR 1 anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3.3.2 Waterbody Crossing Procedures Crossing of waterbodies will be conducted in accordance with applicable state and

federal permits, the Project-specific Procedures, and the Project ECP. Transco will utilize

various methods for installation of the pipeline across waterbodies, depending on waterbody

classifications and flow conditions at the time of crossing. In accordance with the FERC

Procedures, waterbodies will be classified as “minor,” “intermediate,” or “major,” as follows:

• Minor waterbody include all waterbodies less than or equal to 10 feet wide at the

water’s edge at the time of crossing;


1-36

• Intermediate waterbody includes all waterbodies greater than 10 feet wide but

less than or equal to 100 feet wide at the water’s edge at the time of crossing;

and

• Major waterbody includes all waterbodies greater than 100 feet wide at the

water’s edge at the time of crossing.

Typical construction drawings for waterbody crossings are provided in Transco’s ECP

[Attachment TBD]. (Transco will submit typical construction drawings with RR 2, with the draft

ECP anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.) Proposed crossing methods for

each waterbody are provided in [Attachment TBD] of RR 2. (Transco will submit proposed

crossings methods with the draft RR 2, anticipated to be filed in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Transco is considering each waterbody crossing method described below. Transco

anticipates that most waterbody crossings will be completed using one of the dry-ditch

methods. However, based on site-specific conditions, Transco may propose an open-cut

crossing method. Transco will coordinate with federal and state agencies throughout the pre-file

process to develop appropriate crossing methodologies for all waterbodies.

1.3.3.2.1 Dry-Ditch Methods

Dam and Pump Crossing The dam and pump crossing method consists of diversion structures used to temporarily

dam the waterbody, which can consist of one or more of the following: imported concrete jersey

barriers, water bladder, port-a-dams, steel plates, and/or sand bags. The selection of the dam

type or material depends on the stream or waterbody depth, flow velocity, channel width, and

type.

This method for crossing streams and waterbodies temporarily diverts stream flow

around construction area activities. Damming structures will be installed upstream and

downstream of the proposed trench. Pumps and hoses will be used to convey flow around the

in-stream work area, discharging the water downstream of the construction site and creating a

dry work area. Multiple discharge pumps may be required to keep the area dry and maintain

adequate flow to avoid flooding of the waterbody upstream. Construction crews also will have

additional pumps on standby for use should they encounter a high-flow event during

construction. The trench then will be excavated, and the pipeline will be installed in the dry ditch.

At the time the upstream and downstream dams will be installed, the pumps will be

started to divert water around the pipeline crossing and associated workspaces. Water will be


1-37

discharged to the downstream area through an energy dissipating (or similar) device to prevent

erosion and scouring and minimize turbidity. Once the pipeline is installed, the trench will be

backfilled to pre-construction contours, and stream banks will be restored prior to restoring

water flow.

The following additional stipulations will apply to all dam and pump waterbody crossings:

• Sufficient pumps, including on-site backup pumps, will be used to maintain

downstream flows;

• Dams will be constructed with materials that prevent sediment and other

pollutants from entering the waterbody;

• Pump intakes will be screened to minimize entrainment of fish; and

• Dams and pumps will be continuously monitored to ensure proper operation

throughout the waterbody crossing.

Flume Crossing Flume pipe(s) will be installed over the trench prior to trenching (or during trenching

should an unforeseen event create flow), which will remain in place and maintained until

restoration of the waterbody is complete. The size and number of flumes will be sufficient for

maximum anticipated flows. Excavation equipment located on the stream banks will work

around the flume pipe during excavation. The pipe will be threaded under the flume pipe and the

ditch will be backfilled while flows are maintained through the flume pipe(s) and downstream. If

topographic conditions do not permit the pipe to be threaded under the flume, then the flow may

be temporarily pumped while the flume is pulled to lower the pipe into the ditch. Flume pipes will

be permanently removed as part of restoration.

The following additional stipulations will apply to all flume waterbody crossings:

• Sand bags or sand bag and plastic sheeting diversion structures or equivalent

will be used to develop an effective seal and to divert stream flow through the

flume pipe;

• Flume pipes will be properly aligned to prevent bank erosion and stream bed

scour;

• Flume pipes will not be removed during trenching, pipe laying, or initial stream

bed restoration activities; and

• All flume pipes and dams that are not also part of the equipment bridge will be

removed as soon as final cleanup of the stream bed and bank is complete.


1-38

Horizontal Directional Drilling Crossing The HDD crossing method is discussed in Section 1.3.3.1.

1.3.3.2.2 Open-Cut Crossing Method Transco will coordinate with federal and state agencies throughout the pre-file process to

develop appropriate crossing methodologies for all waterbodies including the use of the open-

cut method. The open-cut construction method involves the excavation of the pipeline trench

across the waterbody, installation of a prefabricated segment of pipeline, and backfilling of the

trench with native material. Depending upon the width of the crossing and the reach of the

excavating equipment, excavation and backfilling of the trench will generally be accomplished

using backhoes or other excavation equipment operating from one or both banks of the

waterbody. As required by Transco’s Procedures, flow will be maintained at all times. Excavated

material from the trench will be placed on the bank above the ordinary high water mark for use

as backfill. The pipe segment will be weighted, as necessary, to provide negative buoyancy and

placed below scour depth. Typical back fill cover requirements will be met, contours will be

restored within the waterbody, and the banks will be stabilized via seeding and/or the installation

of erosion control matting or riprap.

The following additional stipulations will apply to all open-cut stream crossings:

• In-stream construction activities (including trenching, pipe installation, backfill,

and streambed restoration will be completed within 24 hours;

• Use of equipment operating in the waterbody will be limited to that needed to

construct the crossing; and

• Material excavated from the trench will be stockpiled in the construction ROW at

least 10 feet from the water’s edge or in additional extra work areas (located at

least 50 feet from the water’s edge).

1.3.3.3 Wetland Crossing Procedures In accordance with construction methods outlined in Transco’s ECP, the width of the

construction ROW will be limited to 75 feet in wetlands. Operation of construction equipment

through wetlands will be limited to only that necessary for each stage of pipeline installation

(e.g., clearing, trenching). Topsoil segregation techniques will be utilized in unsaturated

wetlands to preserve the seed bank and allow for successful restoration. Wetland crossing

methods will be determined based on site-specific conditions. Wetlands with soils that can

support construction equipment may be crossed using the conventional open-cut method, as


1-39

described below, with the use of timber mats to prevent soil rutting. Transco will utilize one of

the following methods for installing the pipeline within wetlands during construction:

• Standard Pipeline Construction (non-saturated wetland);

• Conventional Wetland Construction (saturated wetland);

• Push-Pull Technique (inundated wetland); and/or

• Trenchless methods (Conventional bore or HDD).

Inundated wetlands may require installation via the push/pull method in which the pipe is

floated to the open trench. The welded pipe is pushed along the water-filled trench until it is in

place. Once in place over the trench, the floats attached to the pipe are cut and the pipe is

allowed to sink into place.

Wetland crossing locations along the pipeline are detailed in RR 2. The wetland impact

summary tables provided in RR 2 identify the proposed crossing technique for each wetland

crossing. (Transco will submit the draft RR 2 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3.3.4 Rugged Topography Rugged topography with steep slopes is present along portions of the pipeline routes

and is summarized in Table 1.3-3. A full list of locations of steep slopes is presented in RR 6.

(Transco will submit the draft RR 6 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Table 1.3-3 Steep Slopes Crossed by the Project Pipelines

Project Component Slope 15 to 30% (miles)

Slopes Greater than 30% (miles) Total Distance (miles)

Pennsylvania

CPL North 13.10 3.94 17.04

CPL South 24.37 10.91 35.28

Grugan Loop 0.93 0.77 1.71

Unity Loop 3.42 1.65 5.07

Virginia

Line A 0.01 0.00 0.01

Line B 0.07 0.00 0.07

Project Total 41.91 17.28 59.19 Key: CPL = Central Penn Line


1-40

Steep slopes will require special construction. The upslope side of the pipeline ROW will

be cut during grading. The material will be removed from the cut will be used to fill the down-

slope edge of the ROW to provide a safe and level surface from which to operate the heavy

equipment. In the areas where slope exceeds 30% (and on lesser slopes where dictated by

soils, geologic hazards, and other conditions), the construction equipment must stabilized for

safety prior to operation. The preferred method will be “winching” the equipment. This process

consists of placing and anchoring a piece of equipment at the top of the slope and using a winch

to manipulate the construction equipment up and down the slope. Permanent trench breakers

consisting of sandbags or foam will be installed in the ditch over and around the pipe in areas of

slope with high erosion potential. Trench breakers also will be used to isolate wet areas and to

minimize channeling of groundwater along the ditch line. In areas of rugged topography, ROW

restoration will begin within 10 days of final pipeline installation to minimize potential erosion

and sedimentation control problems.

1.3.3.5 Agricultural Lands To preserve soil productivity in agricultural lands, up to 12 inches of topsoil will be

segregated and stockpiled separately from subsoil during construction. Transco will utilize full

ROW topsoil segregation within agricultural lands. Rock (4 inches in size or larger) will be

removed from the top 12 inches (topsoil layer) during initial clean-up such that revegetation

efforts are not impacted by rock material and the conditions of the construction rights-of-way are

similar in soil composition to surrounding areas. During the backfilling and restoration phases,

topsoil will be replaced. Drain tiles or irrigation systems damaged during construction will be

repaired or replaced, and a crop-monitoring program will be implemented to ensure that crop

productivity is restored to preconstruction conditions. RR 8 contains additional information

regarding construction procedures and mitigation measures within agricultural lands crossed by

the Project. (Transco will submit the draft RR 8 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3.3.6 Residential Areas Residential areas crossed by the Project are identified in RR 8. (Transco will submit the

draft RR 8 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.) RR 8 lists the residences and other structures

(e.g., commercial buildings and electric transmission line towers) within 50 feet of the

construction ROW for the Project. Pursuant to FERC requirements, Transco is developing

Project-specific Residential Construction Plans (RCPs) for residences within 50 feet of

construction workspace on the Project. RCPs for occupied residential buildings within 50 feet of

construction workspaces are provided in Transco’s ECP. (Transco will submit RCPs with its


1-41

draft ECP in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.) These drawings will identify measures to minimize

disruption and maintain access to the residences.

Temporary construction impacts on residential areas could include inconvenience

caused by noise and dust generated by construction equipment, construction personnel

vehicles, and trenching of roads or driveways; ground disturbance of lawns; removal of trees,

landscaped shrubs, or other vegetative screening between residences; damage to existing

septic systems or wells; and removal of aboveground structures, such as fences, sheds, or

trailers from the rights-of-way.

Construction through or near residential areas will be done in a manner to ensure that

construction activities minimize adverse impacts on residences and that cleanup is prompt and

thorough. Affected landowners will be notified seven days before construction is to start on their

properties, unless more advance notice is required by the landowner agreement. Access to

homes will be maintained. Transco will implement construction measures in Transco’s Plan and

documented in Project-specific RCPs to minimize construction-related impacts on all residences

and other structures located within 50 feet of the construction ROW, including:

• Attempting to maintain, where feasible, a minimum distance of 25 feet between

any residence and the edge of the construction work area;

• Installing a safety fence at the edge of the construction ROW for a distance of

100 feet on either side of the residence;

• Fencing the boundary of the construction work area to ensure that construction

equipment and materials, including the spoil pile, remain within the construction

work area;

• Attempting to leave mature trees and landscaping intact within the construction

work area, unless the trees and landscaping interfere with the installation

techniques or present unsafe working conditions;

• Ensuring piping is welded and installed as quickly as reasonably possible to

minimize the amount of time a neighborhood is affected by construction;

• Backfilling the trench within 10 days after the pipe is installed, or temporarily

placing steel plates over the trench; and

• Completing final cleanup, grading, and installation of permanent erosion control

devices within 10 days after backfilling the trench, weather permitting.


1-42

Topsoil in landscaped lawns will be segregated and replaced, or topsoil will be imported.

Immediately after backfilling, residential areas will be restored, and all construction debris will be

removed. Compaction testing will be performed, and soil compaction mitigation will be

performed in severely compacted areas. Lawns will be raked and restored in accordance with

individual landowner agreements. Topsoil will be added, as necessary, and ornamental shrubs

will be replaced, when possible. Private property, such as mailboxes, fences, gates, and other

structures, that has been removed, will be restored. Sidewalks, driveways, and roads disturbed

by pipeline construction will be restored to original or better condition upon completion of

construction activities.

If the construction ROW crosses a road or driveway, Transco will maintain existing

access or provide alternative access so residents have ingress/egress to their homes. In the

case of a road crossing where the road will be open cut, one lane will remain open during

construction, or traffic will be detoured around the work area through the use of adjacent

roadways. Traffic safety personnel will be present during construction periods, and signage and

safety measures will be developed in compliance with applicable state and local roadway

crossing licenses. Notice of potential roadway disturbances related to construction of the Project

will be made available to the public by way of the following:

• Publication in newspapers of local circulation;

• Notice provided to affected regional school districts;

• Posted on the affected town bulletins; and/or

• Posted along the affected route via electronic construction signage.

Landowners whose access to their property would be affected by roadway construction

will receive preconstruction notification either in-person or via phone communications from

Transco’s land agents. At a minimum, Transco will attempt to provide individual notification to

immediately affected landowners seven days before construction is to start and will attempt to

provide general public notifications as early as possible or as required under permit conditions.

1.3.3.7 Stove-pipe or Drag-Section Transco will use specialized stove-pipe or drag-section construction in areas that may

require restricted workspaces. The stove-pipe construction method typically is used when the

pipeline is to be installed in proximity to an existing structure and an open trench would have an

adverse impact. The technique involves installing one joint of pipe at a time, in which the


1-43

welding, weld inspection, and coating activities are all performed in the open trench, thereby

reducing the width of the construction ROW.

The drag-section construction method is another method that is used for construction in

areas that may require restricted workspaces. This technique involves trenching, installing a

prefabricated length of pipe containing several segments, and backfilling, all in one day. Both

stove-pipe and drag-section methods result in the trench being backfilled and/or covered with

steel plates or equipment mats or protected by fencing, as necessary, to ensure safety at the

end of each day though the length of excavation performed each day typically will not exceed

the amount of pipe installed.

1.3.3.8 Utility Crossings The Project will encounter buried utilities throughout the construction corridor. The

location of buried utilities will be confirmed through potholing or other methods prior to

construction of the pipeline, and, when possible, the depth and orientation of the buried utility

will be determined. The Project will be designed and constructed to avoid or minimize impacts

on existing utility lines; however, in some instances, utility relocation (temporary or permanent)

may be required for installation of the new pipeline. Transco will coordinate any necessary

relocation with the affected utility.

Crossing of foreign pipelines generally requires the pipeline to be buried at greater

depths, depending upon the depth of the foreign pipeline. Transco will maintain a minimum of

24 inches of clearance when crossing foreign pipelines, utilities, or other structures. Pipeline

burial depths in areas requiring special construction techniques through rock will comply with

USDOT requirements (49 CFR Part 192). Prior to the commencement of construction activities,

Transco will contact the appropriate state’s “Call Before You Dig” system as well as the national

“811” call system, to identify and mark underground utilities and foreign pipelines. Trenching in

the vicinity of these foreign utilities will begin only after appropriate notification procedures are

complete.

1.3.3.9 Road and Railroad Crossings Prior to road and railroad crossing construction, Transco will locate all existing

underground utilities and make provisions for traffic management in work areas, as necessary.

The majority of road crossings will be completed using standard open cut or trenchless

methods, such as conventional bore methods as discussed in Section 1.3.3.1. Paved roads

encountered along the Project route may be crossed via the use of open-cut or subsurface


1-44

bores. Safe and accessible conditions will be maintained during construction at road crossings

per the Transco’s Plan. The crossing of paved public roads will typically be accomplished by

conventional boring techniques.

The pipeline will be buried to a depth of at least 5 feet below the road surface and will be

designed to withstand anticipated external loadings. Where the ROW or access roads intersect

public paved roads, a crushed stone pad will be installed for access at ROW entrances and as

needed at additional access road locations. To prevent sediment from being washed from the

construction ROW onto roads during a rain event, sediment barriers will be installed adjacent to

paved roads. Additional information regarding public roads crossed by the Project is provided in

RR 8. (Transco will submit the draft RR 8 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

Railroad crossings will typically be completed using conventional boring depending on

site conditions as discussed in Section 1.3.3.1. RR 8 provides additional information regarding

the crossing of roadways and railroads associated with the Project. (Transco will submit the

draft RR 8 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3.3.10 Rock Removal Rock encountered during trenching will be removed using one of the following

techniques:

• Conventional excavation with a backhoe;

• Ripping with a bulldozer, followed by backhoe excavation;

• Hammering with a pointed backhoe attachment or a pneumatic rock hammer,

followed by backhoe excavation;

• Rock ripping; or

• Blasting, followed by backhoe excavation.

The technique selected will depend on rock properties, such as relative hardness,

fracture susceptibility, expected volume, and location. If blasting is required, it will be performed

according to strict guidelines designed to control energy release. Proper safeguards will be

taken to protect people and property in the area. RR 6 will include details relative to blasting,

including a table that provides areas where the depth to rock is likely less than 60 inches based

on published soil survey data. Transco assumes that rock removal will be required at these

locations. Mats made of heavy steel mesh or other materials will be used, as necessary, to

prevent scattering of rock and debris. Sand and/or gravel from off site will be utilized for packing

of blast charges in all areas requiring blasting, including wetlands and waterbodies. While


1-45

preforming blasting activities, Transco will adhere to regulations applicable to controlled-blasting

and blast vibration limits with regard to structures and underground utilities. Special care will be

taken to monitor and assess blasting within 150 feet of dwellings and private or public water

supply wells.

Transco has developed a Project-specific Blasting Plan that establishes procedures and

safety measures to which Transco’s contractor will be required to adhere while conducting

blasting activities along the pipeline rights-of-way during the Project. (Transco will submit a draft

Blasting Plan in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.) Prior to blasting, the Blasting Plan will be

submitted to the FERC for review and approval. Transco will not initiate blasting operations

without receiving written approval from FERC. Transco’s contractor will be required to submit a

detailed Blasting Specification Plan to Transco that is consistent with the provisions of the

Blasting Plan.

Excess rock is defined as all rock that cannot be returned to the existing rock profile in

the trench or graded cuts or is not needed to restore the ROW surface to a condition

comparable to that found adjacent to the rights-of-way. Excess rock will be hauled off the rights-

of-way and disposed of at an approved landfill or recycling facility, unless approved for use as

slope stabilization, windrowing, or for some other use on the construction work areas approved

by FERC, the landowner, and /or applicable regulatory agencies.

1.3.3.11 Trench Dewatering Trench dewatering is required for the removal of stormwater or infiltrated water in areas

of shallow groundwater or saturated wetlands. The water will be pumped from the trench to a

location downgradient of the trench. The trench will be dewatered in a manner that does not

cause erosion and does not result in heavily silt-laden water flowing into any waterbody or

wetland. The water will be discharged to an energy dissipation dewatering device, such as a

hay bale structure. Heavily silt-laden water must first pass through a filter bag. The dewatering

structure will be removed as soon as possible after completion of the dewatering activities.

Trench plugs will be used where necessary to separate the upland trench from adjacent

wetlands or waterbodies to prevent the inadvertent draining of the wetland or diversion of water

from the waterbody into the pipe trench. Pumps will be placed in secondary containment.

1.3.3.12 Winter Construction Winter construction techniques are required in some parts of the country that experience

extended periods of freezing conditions or heavy snowfall events. Winter construction


1-46

techniques typically include managing snow, working with frozen soils, and managing

hydrostatic discharge water under freezing conditions. (Transco is currently determining the

need for winter construction workspaces and will request additional construction ROW or

ATWSs, as applicable [Transco will submit this request with the draft RR 1 and RR 8 in the 3rd

or 4th quarter of 2014].) Winter construction techniques also include the application of

temporary erosion and sediment control measures to protect against accelerated erosion during

spring snowmelt and heavy spring rains. Temporary BMPs may include installation of sediment

barriers, application of mulch or installation of erosion control matting, temporary seeding,

and/or installation of other BMPs. These temporary controls are maintained during Project

construction and reinstalled as necessary until permanent BMPs are constructed and/or

permanent stabilization has occurred. Transco has developed a Project-specific Winter

Construction Plan that is provided in [Attachment TBD]. (Transco’s Winter Construction Plan will

be submitted in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.3.4 Aboveground Facilities The aboveground facilities will be constructed in accordance with Transco’s

specifications and USDOT requirements. The duration of construction for the aboveground

facilities will vary, based on the scope of the work required to construct each proposed facility.

1.3.4.1 Clearing and Grading Aboveground facility sites will be cleared of vegetation, graded, and compacted, as

necessary, to create level surfaces for the movement of construction vehicles on the sites and

to prepare the areas for construction. Transco will install appropriate erosion and sediment

controls around disturbed areas prior to the start of facility construction to minimize the potential

for erosion and the potential for impacts on off-site wetlands and waterbodies.

1.3.4.2 Foundations Building foundations will be constructed of poured reinforced concrete. Buildings and

associated equipment will be placed on the foundations. Topsoil, if present, will be stripped from

the area where foundations are to be constructed. Such soil may be used on-site, either for

landscaping or for final site restoration. Additional soil or subsurface materials may be imported

from approved sources to achieve the desired site/foundation grade.

1.3.4.3 Building Design and Construction The building type (e.g., steel structure, concrete module) and necessity would be

evaluated based on climate, operating conditions, permit conditions, and compliance with land


1-47

use regulations or noise mitigation purposes. The design of the building(s) shall comply with

local building codes. Buildings shall be adequately ventilated, equipped with lighting and

insulation if required, and have a sufficient number of doorways to provide unobstructed access

for personnel. Steel building structures will be painted with a durable coating system to protect

them from the outside elements. During a typical meter station building construction sequence,

the pre-fabricated structural members, steel plate, steel roof decking, gutters and all associated

hardware are off loaded from the transport trailer and then are installed and erected in place on

the constructed foundation and/or pad. All of the building components will be appropriately

connected and tied into each other according to the manufacturer’s installation specifications

and appropriately waterproofed.

Selection of monolithic concrete module structures will require an appropriately sized

mobile crane to lift the building module(s) off of the transport trailer and set them in place on the

previously constructed foundation wall and/or pad. All of the modules will be appropriately

connected and tied into each other according to the manufacturer’s installation specifications

and appropriately waterproofed. In addition, whether the selection is a steel structure or a

concrete module, the design will include cutouts for protrusions through the structure (e.g.,

electrical and communications conduits and other piping) and will be flashed to ensure that the

buildings will be weather-tight. Noise abatement equipment may also be installed during this

phase of construction.

1.3.4.4 Pressure Testing Prior to placing the aboveground facilities into service, Transco proposes to conduct

pressure testing of the piping system. Transco proposes to conduct this testing in accordance

with applicable federal and state codes or regulatory requirements.

1.3.4.5 Infrastructure Facilities The installation of the infrastructure facilities includes the various components of

auxiliary equipment, piping, and other electrical and mechanical systems. Permanent access

roads and parking areas will be constructed during construction of the aboveground facilities. A

detailed list of the infrastructure facilities associated with the two meter stations and three

regulator stations can be found in Section 1.2.2.

1.3.4.6 Final Grading and Landscaping Prior to construction, Transco will develop plans for the final grading and landscaping of

the areas that will be disturbed during construction, including any visual screening measures


1-48

that may be necessary. These final grading and landscaping plans will be consistent with the

Transco’s Plan for the restoration of uplands. If necessary, visual screening will be incorporated

into the design and will be depicted on the aboveground facility plot plans. Once construction is

complete, disturbed areas of aboveground facilities that are not covered with impervious surface

or gravel will be finish-graded and seeded to stabilize soils. A security fence then will be

constructed around the facility.

1.3.5 Environmental Compliance, Training, and Inspection For purposes of quality assurance and compliance with mitigation measures and other

applicable regulatory requirements, Transco will be represented on each construction spread by

a chief inspector. The chief inspector will be assisted by one or more craft inspectors, and an

environmental compliance manager. Additionally, a lead environmental inspector will oversee

several other EIs. The EI(s) will report directly to Transco’s chief inspector and will have “stop

work” authority. The EIs’ duties are consistent with those contained in paragraph III.B,

Responsibilities of the Environmental Inspector, of Transco’s Plan and will include ensuring

Project compliance with environmental conditions associated with the FERC Certificate,

Transco’s environmental designs and specifications, and environmental conditions attached to

other permits or authorizations. Prior to construction, Project EIs and the contractor’s

supervisory personnel will receive copies of the construction drawing package.

Transco’s engineering and construction departments are responsible for designing and

constructing certificated facilities in compliance with regulatory and non-regulatory requirements

and agreements. Any issues of non-compliance with mitigation measures or other regulatory

requirements that cannot be solved in the field will be addressed by the construction manager

(Area Chief). If technical or management assistance is required, construction headquarters staff

will request assistance from the appropriate Transco department or division. Transco operations

will be responsible for long-term Project maintenance and regulatory compliance.

Routine reporting or specific communication with FERC staff regarding design,

installation, and maintenance of the facilities described in this RR will be the responsibility of

Transco’s Permits Department. FERC staff inquiries regarding these proposed facilities should

be addressed to Transco’s Permits Department.

In addition, Transco will fund a third-party construction compliance monitoring program

during construction of the Project. Transco will essentially provide the funding for a third-party

on-site monitor to represent (and report directly to) the Commission. The program will provide

full-time monitors to conduct daily inspections of construction activities and provide regular


1-49

feedback on compliance issues to FERC, any other agencies as appropriate, and Transco’s

environmental inspection team. The monitors will track and document construction progress by

the preparation and submittal of daily and weekly reports to FERC. Other objectives of the third-

party monitoring program will be to assist in the timely resolution of compliance-related issues in

the field, to provide continuous information to FERC and Transco regarding instances of

noncompliance and their resolution, to facilitate addressing landowner concerns, and to process

and track construction-related variance requests.

1.3.6 Training Transco will conduct safety and specialized training for its EIs and general

environmental awareness training for other company construction personnel and contractors

regarding proper field implementation of the Transco’s Plan and Procedures, regulatory

conditions, and other mitigation measures. Transco’s Operation and Maintenance Plan will

include copies of pertinent permits, with particular reference to long-term permit conditions that

require training.

1.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Transco will operate and maintain the proposed facilities in compliance with USDOT

regulations provided in 49 CFR Part 192, the FERC guidance in 18 CFR 380.15, and

maintenance provisions of the Transco’s Plan and Procedures. The facilities will be operated

and maintained in a manner such that pipeline integrity is protected to ensure that a safe,

continuous supply of natural gas reaches its ultimate destination. Maintenance activities will

include regularly scheduled gas-leak surveys and measures necessary to repair any potential

leaks. The latter may include repair or replacement of pipe segments. All fence posts, signs,

marker posts, aerial markers, and decals will be painted or replaced to ensure that the pipeline

locations will be visible from the air and ground. The pipeline and aboveground facilities will be

patrolled on a routine basis, and personnel well qualified to perform both emergency and routine

maintenance on interstate pipeline facilities will handle maintenance. Operation and

maintenance considerations for the proposed facilities with regard to safety are further

described in RR 11. (Transco will submit the draft RR 11 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.4.1 Pipeline Facilities Operational activity on the pipeline will be limited primarily to maintenance of the

permanent ROW and inspection, repair, and cleaning of the pipeline itself. Regular pipeline

patrols will provide information on possible leaks, construction activities, erosion, exposed pipe,


1-50

population density, possible encroachment, and any other potential problems that may affect the

safety and operation of the pipeline. In addition, Transco will be a participant in the “Dig Safe”

system for utility companies in the states where the Project will occur, as well as the national

“Call Before You Dig” system. Under either system, anyone planning excavation activities must

call a dedicated telephone number to alert all utility companies. Representatives of the utility

companies that may be affected then visit the site and mark their facilities so that the excavation

can proceed with relative certainty as to the location of all underground lines. The pipeline

cathodic protection system also will be monitored and inspected periodically to ensure proper

and adequate corrosion protection. Appropriate responses to conditions observed during

inspection will be taken.

Other maintenance functions will include: 1) periodic seasonal mowing of the rights-of-

way in accordance with the timing restrictions outlined in Section VII.A.5 of the Transco’s Plan

and ECP; 2) terrace repair, backfill replacement, and drain tile repair, as necessary; 3) periodic

inspection of water crossings; and 4) maintenance of a supply of emergency pipe, leak repair

clamps, sleeves, and other equipment needed for repair activities. Transco will not use

herbicides or pesticides within 100 feet of a wetland or waterbody unless approved by

applicable regulatory agencies.

1.4.1.1 Cleared Areas A typical post-construction permanent ROW of 50 feet will be maintained for the

greenfield pipelines and an additional 25 feet for pipeline loops, in accordance with Transco’s

Plan and Procedures. Maintaining a cleared ROW is necessary for the following reasons:

• Access for routine pipeline patrols and corrosion surveys;

• Access in the event that emergency repairs of the pipeline are needed;

• Visibility during aerial patrols; and

• To serve as a visual indicator to the public of an underground pipeline utility and

easement.

In accordance with Transco’s Plan and Procedures, annual vegetation maintenance

within both upland and wetland portions along Transco’s permanent ROW will be conducted but

only within the 10-foot corridor centered over the pipelines to facilitate route patrols and

emergency access. Operational vegetation maintenance within upland portions of Transco’s

permanent ROW will be conducted with a frequency of approximately once every three years to

maintain an herbaceous cover state. Transco will not conduct routine vegetation maintenance


1-51

over the full width of its permanent ROW within wetlands. However, Transco reserves the right

to selectively cut and remove trees within wetlands that are larger than 15 feet in height that are

located within 15 feet of the pipeline with roots that could compromise the integrity of pipeline

coating.

Following construction of the pipeline facilities, temporary construction workspaces and

ATWS will be allowed to revert to preconstruction land use/land cover, with no further vegetation

maintenance by Transco. Additionally, crop production will be allowed to continue in agricultural

areas immediately following construction or during the following growing season.

1.4.1.2 Erosion Control Erosion problems on the pipeline ROW will be reported to the local operations

supervisor. These reports may originate from landowners or Transco’s routine patrol of the

ROW. Corrective measures will be conducted, as needed.

1.4.1.3 Periodic Pipeline and ROW Patrols Transco’s permanent pipeline ROW will be patrolled on a periodic basis. The frequency

of the patrol of the pipeline by either aerial or ground surveys will be determined in accordance

with Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration requirements by the pipeline size,

operating pressure, class, terrain, weather, and other relevant factors. The interval between

patrols may not be longer than prescribed in Table 1.4-1.

Table 1.4-1 Maximum Interval Between Patrols

Class Location of Line a At Highway and Railroad Crossings At All Other Places

1 and 2 7-1/2 months, but at least twice each calendar year

15 months, but at least once each calendar year

3 4-1/2 months, but at least four times each calendar year

7-1/2 months, but at least twice each calendar year

4 4-1/2 months, but at least four times each calendar year

4-1/2 months, but at least four times each calendar year

Note: a As defined by USDOT PHMSA at 49 CFR 192.5:

Class 1: offshore areas and areas within 220 yards of a pipeline with ≤10 buildings intended for human occupancy. Class 2: areas within 220 yards of a pipeline with >10 but <46 buildings intended for human occupancy. Class 3: areas within 220 yards of a pipeline with ≥46 buildings intended for human occupancy; and areas within 100 yards of

either a building or a small, well defined outside area (such as a playground, recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more persons on at least five days per week for 10 weeks in any 12-month period.

Class 4: areas within 220 yards of a pipeline where buildings with four or more stories are prevalent.


1-52

Additional ground surveys will be conducted on an as-needed basis to respond to issues

such as landowner concerns and third-party encroachments. During ROW patrols, all

permanent erosion control devices that are installed during construction will be inspected to

ensure that they function properly. Additionally, attention will be given to:

• Existing stormwater outfalls along the alignment;

• Erosion and washouts along the ROW;

• Water control devices, such as diversions;

• Condition of banks at drainage ditch crossings;

• Fallen timber or other threats to the pipeline;

• Shrubs and other vegetation planted during construction; and

• Any other conditions that could endanger the pipeline.

The local operations supervisor will be notified of any conditions that need attention.

Corrective measures will be performed, as needed.

1.4.2 Aboveground Facilities Transco will operate and maintain the proposed aboveground facilities in accordance

with standard procedures designed to ensure the integrity of the facilities and to provide its

customers and the general public with a safe and dependable natural gas supply. The facilities

will be designed, constructed, and operated in accordance with requirements of the

Commission, USDOT, industry-proven practices and techniques, and other regulatory

requirements, as applicable.

In accordance with USDOT regulations (49 CFR Part 192), the facilities will be inspected

regularly for leakage as part of scheduled operations and maintenance. Standard operations at

existing meter stations include activities, such as the calibration, maintenance, and inspection of

equipment; the monitoring of pressure, temperature, and vibration data; and traditional

landscape maintenance, such as mowing and application of fertilizer. Standard operations also

include the periodic checking of safety and emergency equipment and cathodic protection

systems.

Project facilities will be marked and identified in accordance with applicable regulations.

Liaison will be maintained with the public, as well as with government agencies regulator

activities at the meter stations. Overall, maintenance activities will be in compliance with

requirements of the Transco’s Plan for this Project, as well as other applicable regulatory

requirements. The meter station facilities will be linked remotely to Transco’s information and


1-53

data software networks and infrastructure that monitor the pipeline system on a 24-hour-per-day

basis.

1.5 FUTURE PLANS AND ABANDONMENT Transco currently has no plans for future expansion or abandonment of the Project

facilities described in this Application. At the end of the useful life of the pipeline and

aboveground facilities, Transco would obtain the necessary authorizations to abandon its

facilities. Any abandonment of the Transco facilities would require prior authorization from

FERC. Transco would submit the appropriate application under the Commission’s regulation at

18 CFR § 157.18 seeking abandonment authorization to FERC, and would comply with

applicable FERC regulations existing at the time of abandonment.

As an open access pipeline, Transco’s FERC Gas Tariff, consistent with Commission

policy, provides a process by which shippers may request additional interconnections with

Transco’s pipeline system. Any additional requests for interconnections on the Transco will be

processed separately from the Project facilities, according to applicable Commission regulations

and policies governing interconnections. If requests are made, Transco will design any facilities

needed for a future expansion (which may consist of pipeline looping, compression, and/or

cooling facilities) to be compatible with Transco’s existing facilities, including the Project

facilities, and will undergo the applicable regulatory review (including the necessary approvals

from the Commission) for any such future expansion.

1.6 PERMITS AND APPROVALS Construction, operation, and maintenance of the Project will be conducted in accordance

with Transco’s’ specifications and applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements. The

environmental permits, licenses, approvals, and certificates that have been identified to date

and will be sought for the Project are identified in Table 1.6-1. Transco and its representatives

have and will continue to consult federal, state, and local regulatory officials and government

agencies regarding this Project. A table summarizing agency correspondence completed to date

is provided in Attachment D. (Transco’s will provide copies of agency correspondence received

to date in advance of the draft RR1 anticipated in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)


1-54

Table 1.6-1 Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations to be Applied for/Requested for the Project

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Status

Federal

Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity FERC

Pre-filing initiated in April 4, 2014; formal application to be

submitted in March 2015

CWA Section 404 Permit/ Section 10 River and Harbor Act

USACE Baltimore District Applications to be submitted in March 2015 USACE Norfolk District

Consultation for: Threatened and Endangered Species;

Migratory Bird Treaty Act; and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act

USFWS Pennsylvania Field Office Consultation initiated in March 2014 and is ongoing

USFWS Chesapeake Bay Field Office

Consultation initiated in April 2014 and is ongoing

USFWS Asheville Field Office

USFWS Raleigh Field Office

USFWS South Carolina Field Office

Appalachian Trail Crossing Consultation National Park Service Consultation initiated in April

2014 and is ongoing

Interstate Agencies

Water Allocation Permit Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) 1st or 2nd Quarter 2016

Water Withdrawal Permit Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) 1st or 2nd Quarter 2016

Pennsylvania (State)

CWA 401 Water Quality Certification and

Chapter 105 Application

PADEP Regional Bureaus of Watershed Management

Applications anticipated to be submitted in April 2015

Chapter 102 ESCGP-2 Application

PADEP Bureau of Land and Water Conservation

Division of Stormwater Management and Sediment Control

Applications anticipated to be submitted in April 2015

CWA Section 402 NPDES – Hydrostatic Test Water Discharge

Permit/Approval

PADEP Bureau of Water Quality Protection

Applications anticipated to be submitted 3rd quarter 2015

Submerged Land License Agreement PADEP – Regional of Watershed Management

Anticipated submittal March 2015

Aid to Navigation Plan PFBC Anticipated submittal March 2015

Stream Blasting Permit PFBC Anticipated submittal March 2015

Highway Occupancy Permit Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Applications anticipated to be submitted in 4th quarter 2015

Consultation (Rare Plant Species) PADCNR Consultation initiated in March 2014 and is ongoing


1-55



Consultation (Rare Aquatic and Amphibian Species) PFBC Consultation initiated in March

2014 and is ongoing

Consultation (Rare Mammalian and Avian Species) PAGC Consultation initiated in March

2014 and is ongoing

State Park Right-of-way License PADNCR Anticipated 2nd Quarter 2015

State Game Land Right-of-way License PGC Anticipated 2nd Quarter 2015

Section 106, National Historic Preservation Act Consultation

Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission

Bureau of Historic Preservation

Consultation initiated in March 2014 and is ongoing

Air Quality Request for Determination PADEP – Air Permitting

Anticipated submittal August 2014

Air Quality Plan Approval (minor) Anticipated submittal August 2014

Maryland

Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated with Construction Activity

Maryland Department of the Environment


Rare Species Clearance Maryland Department of the Environment

Consultation commenced April 2014

Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Consultation

Maryland Historical Trust Anticipated October 2014

Air Permit Change Notice Maryland Department of the Environment


Virginia

CWA 401 Water Quality Certification and Chapter 105 Application

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality – Northeast Regional Office

Application anticipated to be filed in April 2015

Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality – Northeast Regional Office

Application anticipated to be filed in April 2015

Consultation (Rare Species) Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation


Section 106 NHPA Consultation Virginia Department of Historic Resources

Anticipated submittal October 2014

Operational Flexibility Notification Virginia Department of Environmental Quality


North Carolina

NPDES General Stormwater Permit North Carolina Division of Energy, Land and Mineral Resources


Rare Species Clearance North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission


Section 106 NHPA Consultation North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources



1-56



502(b)(10) Notifications North Carolina Department of

Environmental and Natural Resources - Division of Air Quality

Anticipated for August 2014

Key: CWA = Clean Water Act DRBC = Delaware River Basin Commission NOAA = National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System PADCNR = Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources PADEP = Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection PAGC = Pennsylvania Game Commission PFBC = Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission SRBC = Susquehanna River Basin Commission USACE = United States Army Corps of Engineers USFWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Transco is committed to complying with the resource protection measures set forth in the

environmental conditions and requirements as specified within federal permits and the

Commission’s Order. Transco shall also endeavor to fulfill conditions requested by state and

local agencies through their applicable permitting processes; however, please note that state

and local regulations are generally preempted by the Natural Gas Act of 1938, particularly to the

extent they conflict with federal regulation, impose conditions above the federal requirements, or

would delay the construction and operation of facilities ultimately certificated by the

Commission.

1.6.1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Pre-Filing FERC is charged by Congress with determining whether the Project is of public

convenience and necessity. On March 31, 2014, Transco submitted its request to participate in

the FERC pre-filing review process, pursuant to the Commission’s regulations at 18 CFR

§ 157.21. On April 4, 2014, FERC granted the request and assigned the Docket No.

PF 14-8-000 to the Project. The purpose of the pre-filing process is to involve interested

stakeholders early in the Project planning process and to identify and resolve issues prior to

filing the application as discussed in Section 1.7.


1-57

1.7 PROJECT OUTREACH Transco began efforts to inform the public, including governmental officials, about the

Project in January 2014. The objective in implementing a comprehensive stakeholder outreach

strategy is to educate and build relationships with interested stakeholders and communities.

Transco began its outreach efforts by contacting state legislative officials and subsequently

contacted other interested stakeholders, including landowners; local, state, and federal

agencies; and state, county, and municipal governmental officials within the Project. Transco

has attempted to identify and resolve issues raised by stakeholders. Outreach efforts are

ongoing.

Transco’s outreach strategy seeks to:

• Personalize the company. In order to carry out community outreach activities in

the pre-siting stage, Transco needs to work with potentially impacted

communities and local officials to communicate with them on a personal level.

• Build relationships. Develop a list of key stakeholder contacts. An essential key

to managing the flow of information to relevant parties is to first define which

individuals, groups, or opinion leaders are important in the siting process.

Conduct early meetings with key stakeholders so that they are not confronted

with “surprises.” Listen to the stakeholders’ thoughts, questions or concerns and

proactively work with them to reach win-win solutions.

• Educate stakeholders. Educate stakeholders about the “big picture.” It is critical

that stakeholders understand: 1) the FERC process; and 2) how the Transco can

help them maintain, or enhance, their quality of life. Also, identify direct economic

benefits that will accrue to the local community as a result of the project.

• Maintain openness. Transco will go out of its way to demonstrate it has nothing

to hide. By making stakeholders aware of new developments and providing them

with timely information, they will begin to perceive Transco as an important

information source. The absence of information from the company opens the

door to speculation and misinformation.

• Build third-party endorsement. Third-party support is vital to building credibility.

Earning endorsements from third parties lends credibility to the pipeline company

and its key messages. In addition, the effectiveness of the Project’s key

messages is greatly increased when delivered by a third-party. This support

gives a pipeline project the support it needs to survive the battle of public opinion.


1-58

• Support local communities. The Transco Company is committed to being a good

neighbor by putting safety, environmental stewardship, and community support at

the heart of its operations. To help achieve this objective, Transco is establishing

a fund to benefit local communities within the counties traversed by the pipeline

project. The mission of the Transco Community Grant Program is to identify and

help fund noteworthy projects that directly benefit the surrounding communities.

For the Project, Transco has proposed facilities that seek to balance landowner and

community concerns, environmental resource issues, and Project requirements. In accordance

with the guidelines adopted by the Commission, Transco encourages landowners; federal,

state, county, and municipal, government officials; environmental groups; and other

stakeholders to discuss their concerns with Transco, as well as the Commission, and to provide

input on the most appropriate location for the pipelines and related facilities associated with the

Project. Transco will attempt to address the concerns raised by various stakeholders through

the evaluation of alternative route segments and the modification of the primary pipeline routes.

Where it is not be possible to modify the location of Project facilities in the manner requested,

Transco will clearly identify the basis for that conclusion.

1.7.1 Public Participation Since January 2014, Transco has been in contact with (a) federal, state, county, and

municipal government officials; (b) state legislators in the communities located along the Project

facilities; (c) state executive offices, state administration officials, state legislative leadership;

and (d) the Pennsylvania U.S. Congressional delegations and their staffs regarding the Project.

During meetings and telephone conversations and in correspondence, Transco provided these

governmental officials with information regarding the proposed facilities, the status of the

requests to landowners for survey permission, the timing and permitting process for the Project,

and the Commission’s pre-filing process. In addition, periodic updates will be provided to

governmental officials and other stakeholders until construction of the Project is complete. Land

agents will continue to be available to address issues through construction and until the Project

is in service.

In addition to the community outreach meetings and the open houses, Transco’s

community outreach program includes the following elements:

• Open house schedule mailed to affected parties;


1-59

• Newspaper advertisements of open houses placed in newspapers of general

circulation in the affected area;

• Newspaper advertisements prior to commencement of construction, which will be

placed in those same publications;

• Notification to businesses potentially affected by construction;

• Designation of a point of contact for stakeholder communication;

• A Project toll free telephone number for public inquiries; and

• A Project website with periodic updates of relevant information.

1.7.1.1 Public Open Houses As part of the public outreach process, Transco will provide information regarding the

Project as well as the Commission’s regulatory process. Tentative dates when the open house

meetings will occur are identified in Table 1.7-1.

Table 1.7-1 Scheduled Project Open Houses

Date County/State Location

TBD Clinton County, PA TBD

TBD Lycoming County, PA TBD

May 19, 2014 Luzerne County, PA Lake Lemon High School

June 2, 2014 Susquehanna County, PA Mount View School District

June 3, 2014 Wyoming County, PA Keystone College

June 4, 2014 Northumberland County, PA The Wayside Inn

June 5, 2014 Columbia County, PA Bloomsburg Fire Department Social Hall

June 9, 2014 Schuykill County, PA Tremont Fire Co. #1

June 10, 2014 Lebanon County, PA Anneville-Cleona High School

June 11, 2014 Lancaster County, PA Columbia No 1 Fire Department

Transco will notify landowners of the public open houses with a letter on May 5 and May

19, 2014.

1.7.1.2 Landowner Consultations Transco provided FERC with the names and addresses of potentially affected

landowners by May 6, 2014. These landowners were contacted beginning in March 2014 to

request access for civil and environmental surveys (wetland/waterbody delineation, habitat


1-60

evaluations, cultural resources) for the pipeline route, access roads, contractor/pipe yards, and

aboveground facility sites. Surveys will be initiated in spring 2014 for properties along the

Project area where access permission has been granted.

In accordance with Section 157.6(d) of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR §

157.6(d) (2010)), Transco will provide notification of the Project to affected and abutting

landowners within three business days following the date that the Commission issues a notice

of the Certificate Proceeding for the Project. In addition, within three business days of the date

that the Commission assigns a docket number to the Certificate application, a copy of the

Certificate application will be placed in public libraries across the Project area. Transco also will

have a public notice of the filing of the Certificate application published twice in a daily or weekly

newspaper of general circulation across the Project area no later than 14 days after the

Commission assigns a docket number to the Certificate application.

Transco’s land representatives follow the guidelines listed in the INGAA Foundation Inc.

publication entitled American’s Natural Gas Transporters’ Commitment to Landowners (INGAA

2008). Transco will implement a Landowner Complaint Resolution Procedure for construction-

related landowner complaints which is provided in Attachment E.

1.7.2 Agency Consultation In addition to public outreach efforts with landowners and governmental officials

described in Section 1.7.1, Transco is in the process of conducting an extensive planning and

consultation process with federal and state regulatory agencies, resource agencies, Native

American Tribes, and other groups with a stake in the Project. The consultation process has

involved briefings, meetings, letter requests for resource information, telephone discussions,

and email correspondence. This section provides a brief description of the more significant

agency and stakeholder consultations that have occurred. A table summarizing agency

correspondence completed to date is provided in Attachment D. (Transco’s will provide copies

of agency correspondence received to date with the draft RR1 anticipated in the 3rd or 4th

quarter of 2014.)

1.7.2.1 Interagency and Other Review/Resource Agency Meetings Beginning in February 2014, Transco contacted federal and state regulatory agencies in

Pennsylvania with respect to the relevant permitting requirements for the Project. Transco

provided preliminary information regarding the Project, including a Project description and

USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles, and advised these agencies of Transco’s intent to use the


1-61

Commission’s pre-filing process. A listing of the federal and state agencies that Transco has

met with to date is provided in Attachment D. Consistent with Order No. 687, Transco

anticipates that it will file for the federal authorizations needed for the Project concurrently with

submission of the Certificate application for the Project to the Commission.

1.7.2.2 Local Government Agency Meetings Beginning in February 2014, Transco contacted county, township, and government

agencies in Pennsylvania to introduce the Project, provide details on the proposed facilities and

routing, explain the Commission’s regulatory process, and solicit feedback from these agencies

regarding the Project.

1.8 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

The potential cumulative impacts associated with the Project may result from the

impacts of construction and operation of the Project facilities combined with the impacts of other

proposed major developments occurring within the vicinity of the Project. To review potential

cumulative impacts, Transco considered recently completed, current, and reasonably

foreseeable future major projects and other human-related activities near the Project facilities.

The basic assumption of the cumulative impacts analysis was that if other activities were

deemed to have minor or insignificant impacts, the cumulative impacts resulting from the

activities and Project would also be considered minor or insignificant.

Cumulative impacts associated with the Project may result from impacts of construction

and operation of the Project facilities when combined with the impacts of other major

developments occurring in the vicinity of the Project. To review potential cumulative impacts,

Transco considered recently completed, current, and reasonably foreseeable future projects

and other human-related activities (collectively “activities”) near the Project facilities. The basic

assumption of the cumulative impacts analysis was that if the activities were deemed to have

minor or insignificant impacts, the cumulative impacts resulting from the activities and the

Project also would be minor or insignificant.

Focus was placed on resources identified in RR 2 through RR 9, and cumulative impacts

were considered for the following: wetlands and waterbodies; consumptive water use;

vegetation and wildlife (primarily state and federal protected species of flora and fauna); cultural

resources; socioeconomics; geology and soils; land use; air quality; and noise.

(Transco will submit a summary of cumulative impacts in draft RR 1 in the 3rd or 4th

quarter of 2014.)


1-62

1.9 NON-JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES

Transco anticipates using local utility companies to supply electric power to the

proposed electric compressor stations. These utilities likely will require minor construction

activities to extend existing power distribution infrastructure to sufficiently support the

incremental load requirements for each facility. At this time, no modifications to the utilities’

overall distribution networks, such as line change outs, will be required. (Transco will submit

detail of non-jurisdictional facilities in draft RR 1 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

1.10 REFERENCES

Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2013. Annual Energy Outlook. Available online:

http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf. Accessed on April 25, 2014.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 2013. Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation,

and Maintenance Plan (May 2013 version) and Wetland and Waterbody Construction

and Mitigation Procedures (May 2013 version). Washington, D.C.

Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA). 2008. America’s Natural Gas

Transporters’ Commitment to Landowners. Endorsed by the INGAA Board of Directors

in January 2008. Washington, D.C. Available online at:

http://www.ingaa.org/Topics/Pipelines101/LandownerCommitment/6849.aspx. Accessed

on February 14, 2014.

_______. 1999. Temporary Right-of-Way Width Requirements for Pipeline Construction.

Available on line at: http://www.ingaa.org/File.aspx?id=19105. Accessed April 25, 2014.

http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf

https://extranet.aecom.com/sites/constitutionpipeline/Shared%20Documents/FERC%20Filings/Final%20ER%20Filing/Williams%20Review%20(pre-Filing)/Vol%20I-Resource%20Reports/RR02%20Water%20Use%20and%20Quality/Constitution_Vol-I_RR_02_06-11-13.docx#




http://www.ingaa.org/Topics/Pipelines101/LandownerCommitment/6849.aspx


Attachment A Aerial and USGS Topographic Map Excerpts of Project Facilities

Provided under separate cover.


Attachment B Summary of Modified Meter and Regulator Station Locations

Attachment B

Table B-1 Meter and Regulator Stations for Odorization

Mainline MP Station Name

Meter and Regulator

Station Number

County Station Type

South Carolina

1228.32 Timken 7290 Cherokee Meter and Regulator

1233.65 Gaffney 7001 Cherokee Meter and Regulator

1234.09 Cherokee Co-Gen 7334 Cherokee Meter

1235.7 Skygen Co-Gen 7366 Cherokee Meter

1237.58 Deering Milliken 7180 Cherokee Meter and Regulator

1240.02 Blacksburg 7083 Cherokee Meter and Regulator

1241.34 Broad River 7201 Cherokee Meter

1241.34 York Road 7396 Cherokee Meter

1245.88 Mill Creek 7385 Cherokee Meter

North Carolina

1247.09 Grover 7134 Cleveland Meter

1247.18 Shelby 7102 Cleveland Meter and Regulator

1247.21 Cleveland County 7398 Cleveland Meter

1249.33 Asheville 7015 Cleveland Meter and Regulator

1251.55 Foote Mineral 7082 Cleveland Meter and Regulator

1252.67 Kings Mountain 7300 Cleveland Meter and Regulator

1255.86 Lithium 7118 Gaston Meter

1260.83 Gastonia 7077 Gaston Meter

1260.84 Bessemer City 7164 Gaston Meter and Regulator

1269.23 Stanley 7270 Gaston Meter

1269.24 Hickory 7132 Gaston Meter

1274.77 Duke Lincoln 7327 Lincoln Meter

1277.7(.18) Lowesville 7318 Lincoln Meter

1287.12 Charlotte 7153 Iredell Meter

1287.13 Davidson 7162 Iredell Meter

1287.11 NC Natural Tidewater 7150 Iredell Meter

1287.1(CFL 15.02) Iredell 7369 Iredell Meter

1274.8(CFL 5.07) Hicks Crossroads 7328 Lincoln Meter

1292.9 Mooresville 7047 Iredell Meter

1293.035 Linwood Road 7393 Iredell Meter

1305.81 Statesville 7184 Rowan Meter

1308.42 Park Road Power Plant 7375 Rowan Meter

Table B-1 Meter and Regulator Stations for Odorization

Mainline MP Station Name

Meter and Regulator

Station Number

County Station Type

1308.45 Salisbury 7069 Rowan Meter and Regulator

1308.45 Frontier Appalachian 7340 Rowan Meter

1312.9 Spencer Buck 7286 Rowan Meter

1323.25 West Lexington 7231 Davidson Meter and Regulator

1330.15 Lexington 7085 Davidson Meter and Regulator

1340.48 Winston Salem 7079 Davidson Meter and Regulator

1348.86 Kernersville 7193 Forsyth Meter

1355.06 Greensboro 7039 Guilford Meter and Regulator

1359.63 Stokesdale 7192 Guilford Meter

1365.98 Bethany 7122 Rockingham Meter and Regulator

1368.36 Rockingham 7349 Rockingham Meter


Attachment C Typical Right-of-Way Cross-Section Diagrams


Attachment D Summary Table of Agency Correspondence

Entity Person Entity Person

Email TRC John Zimmer USACE Mike Dombroskie 29-Jan-14 Project Introduction

MeetingE&E,

Transco, TRCDawson

Transco - Anne Allen, Amanda Harford, John Merancy, Perry Luu, E&E - Greg Netti, Casey Talento, Rachel Smith, TRC - John Zimmer, Dawson - Kirk Stark

USACE, PA Fish & Boat Commission

USACE - Mike Dombroskie, PAFBC -Heather Smiles

27-Mar-14 Project Introduction

Email USFWS_PA Pamela Shellenberg E&E Rachel Smith 5-Feb-14 T&E Consultation

Email USFWS_PA Pamela Shellenberg E&E Rachel Smith 5-Feb-14USFWS Project

Number

Letter E&E Rachel Smith USFWS_PA Pamela Shellenberg 7-Mar-14Initiation of T&E

Consultation

Meeting E&E, TranscoRachel Smith, E&E; Anne Allen, Transco

USFWS_PAPamela Shellenberg and Jennifer Siani


Email E&E Justin Zoladz, E&E USFWS_PA Pamela Shellenberg 15-Apr-14Bat Survey Work

Plan

Email E&E Justin Zoladz, E&E USFWS_PA Pamela Shellenberg 16-Apr-14Bat Survey Work

Plan

Letter E&E Rachel Smith, E&E USFWS_MDCherry Keller, USFWS Chesapeake Bay Field Office

28-Apr-14Natural Heritage

Program Consultation

Letter USFWS_VAT&E Consultation Tracking 05E2VA00-2014-SLI-1736

E&E Rachel Smith 25-Apr-14A and B Replacement Natural Heritage Consultation


E&E Rachel Smith 25-Apr-14Station 170 Natural Heritage Consultation


E&E Rachel Smith 25-Apr-14Station 185 Natural Heritage Consultation

Letter E&E Rachel Smith, E&E USFWS_NC John Hammond, USFWS NC 28-Apr-14Natural Heritage


Email NPS Michele Kuna E&E Rachel Smith 4-Feb-14Appalachian Trail

Crossing initial consultation

Contact Report

NPS Michele Kuna E&E Rachel Smith 11-Feb-14Appalachian Trail






Email NPS Michele Kuna E&E Rachel Smith 28-Mar-14 Meeting Request

Letter Transco Anne Allen NPS Wendy Janssen 3-Apr-14

Proposed Appalachian Trail

Crossing, Lebanon County PA

Atlantic Sunrise Project Agency Correspondence (as of April 28, 2014)From To

Type Date Subject

Federal AgenciesUS Army Corps of Engineers - Baltimore District

US Fish and Wildlife ServiceUSFWS - Pennsylvania

USFWS - Maryland

USFWS - Virginia

USFWS - North Carolina

National Park Service



Type Date Subject

MeetingTransco /

TRC21-Jan-14 Project Introduction

MeetingTransco /

E&E / TRC27-Mar-14 Project Introduction

Email E & E Casey Talento PADCNR Rebecca Bowen 14-Feb-14Introduction Meeting

Invite

Letter E & E Rachel Smith PADCNR Rebecca Bowen 7-Mar-14Initiation of T&E

Consultation

Email E & E Casey Talento PAFBC Chris Urban 14-Feb-14Introduction Meeting

Invite

Letter E & E Rachel Smith PAFBC Chris Urban 7-Mar-14Initiation of T&E

Consultation

Email E & E Greg Netti PAFBC Heather Smiles 2-Apr-14Request for review of

Waterbody Classification list

Email PAFBC Heather Smiles E&E Greg Netti 17-Apr-14Waterbody

Classification Crossing review

Letter PAFBC Heather Smiles E&E Rachel Smith 17-Apr-14 PDNI Response

Contact Report

PAGC John Taucher E & E Casey Talento 10-Feb-14Introduction Meeting

Setup

Email PAGC John Taucher E & E Casey Talento 10-Feb-14Introduction Meeting

Details

Email E & E Casey Talento PAGC John Taucher 14-Feb-14Game Land

Crossing/Special Use Permit

Email PAGC John Taucher E & E Casey Talento 19-Feb-14Game Land

Crossing/Special Use Permit

Letter E & E Rachel Smith PAGC Tracey Librandi Mumma 7-Mar-14Initiation of T&E

Consultation

Meeting E&E, TranscoRachel Smith, E&E: Anne Allen, Transco

PADCNR/ PAGC

Nathan Havens and John Taucher (PAGC); Greg Podniesinski and Emilee Boyer (PADCNR)


Email URS Ken Duerksen PHMC Noël Strattan 21-Feb-14Previously recorded cultural resources

Email URS Ken Duerksen PHMCSteve McDougal, Cheryl Nagel, Mark Shaffer, Barbara Frederic

14-Mar-14Inquiry to ascertain

review structure

Phone URS Ken Duerksen PHMC Steve McDougal 18-Mar-14Further discussions

regarding review structure

Email URS Ken Duerksen PHMCSteve McDougal, Cheryl Nagel, Mark Shaffer, Barbara Frederic

31-Mar-14Setting Scoping

meeting with PHMC

Letter E&E Rachel Smith, E&E VDGIF Gladys Cason 28-Apr-14Natural Heritage


Letter E&E Rachel Smith, E&E MDNRLori Byrne, MDNR Wildlife & Heritage Service

28-Apr-14Natural Heritage


Anne Allen, Transco, Cindy Ivey Transco; John Merancy, Transco; Perry Luu, Transco: Denise Brinley, TRC; John Zimmer, TRC; Dana Aunkst, PADEP; Jeff

Pennsylvania Agencies

Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission

Virginia Department of Gameland and Inland Fisheries

Maryland Department of Natural Resources

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionAnne Allen, Transco, Cindy Ivey Transco; John Merancy, Transco; Perry Luu, Transco: Denise Brinley, TRC; John Zimmer, TRC; Dana Aunkst, PADEP; Jeff

Virginia Agencies

Maryland Agencies

Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission

Pennsylvania Game Commission



Type Date Subject

Letter E&E Rachel Smith, E&E NC NHP Alison Weakley 28-Apr-14Natural Heritage


North Carolina Natural Heritage ProgramNorth Carolina Agencies


Attachment E Landowner Complaint Resolution Procedures

1

Landowner Complaint -

Source

•FERC (800 hotline, subscription, In-person ) •Transco – Direct (Agent in-person, letter, email, phone, website) •Meetings (stakeholder meetings, scoping meetings, open houses)

Identification

of Land Ownership

•Transco Land staff will research to determine if the complaintant is an affected landowner or an unaffected landowner / interested party.

Qualify the Complaint

•Is the complaint an issue that is directed towards a specific property-related issue / discipline or is it a general complaint against the Project in whole?

Define the Complaint

•What is the specific issue? •Contact the landowner for further information. In most cases, a landowner will be contacted within 24 hours

of notice of complaint. •If the issue can be resolved by phone or in-person, then the agent will do so at that time.

Record the Complaint

and Contact

•All complaints and subsequent conversations shall be recorded in the tract file contact report. •A report is created by the assigned land agent for each separate conversation.

Resolution is Determined

•The land supervisor, assigned land agent, and other subject matter experts may work together to analize the specific issue and determine one or more solutions that resolves the landowner complaint. The best solution will be chosen. •In some cases, there may not be a possible resolution to the landowner complaint.

Resolution Implemented

•If the resolution requires a specific action from an individual or process, it will be implemented.

Landowner Follow-Up

•The resolution or answer to a complaint will be followed-up with the landowner.

LANDOWNER COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE

Landowner complaints and/or concerns during the Atlantic Sunrise Project (Project) are of major importance to Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco). It is imperative that identified concerns be addressed in a timely manner to effectively determine a resolution. The landowner complaint resolution process is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1

2

Complaint Source Landowner complaints may be communicated through several mechanisms. Transco and FERC have set up a number of methods of contact as depicted in Table 2 (below). Transco receives complaints directly through verbal or written communication. Verbal complaints can be communicated by phone, direct discussion with a land agent, or in a public forum such as an open house, scoping meeting, or other informational meeting. Written complaint communication is submitted through one of the methods shown in Table 2. Media monitoring also assists Transco in understanding community awareness and concerns relative to the Project. Transco regularly reviews newspaper articles, op-ed pieces, television / news reports, social media and non-company websites to stay informed about specific issues concerning the Project, which increases preparedness when discussing Project-related comments when they arise. Transco also reviews landowner complaints filed through the FERC e-subscription service for the Project Docket.

Table 2 Transco and FERC Landowner Contacts for the Project

Identification of Landownership Once a complaint is received, the landowner / party making the complaint is identified through the land database. The landowner’s property can be seen as directly affected by the Project, within the 600-foot wide survey corridor, or as having a non-affected parcel. Whether a tract is affected or not affected does not make the landowner’s complaint any more or less valid, but ensures that Transco has the best understanding of a possible issue. If the complaint is a landowner related issue, the Land Department will track and attempt to resolve the concern. Complaints from a Non-Government Organization or citizens group tend to be general complaints. These complaints are passed onto Public Outreach to address. The Land Department does not track or record these complaints.

Local Project Office Local Project Office Company Website Assigned Land Agent FERC

300 Laird Street Suite 200 Wilkes Barre, PA 18702

570-208-9860 or

1-844-785-0455

williams.com/atlanticsunrise Mike Lamb TBD


570-208-9860 or

1-844-785-0455 williams.com/atlanticsunrise James Laramine

303 Schoolhouse Road Danville, PA 17821

570-284-4120 or

1-844-785-0455 williams.com/atlanticsunrise Don Davis

2578 Interstate Drive Suite 101 Harrisburg, PA 17011

717-545-2600 or

1-844-785-0455 williams.com/atlanticsunrise John Purvis

3

Qualify the Complaint A complaint is reviewed and determined to be categorized in the following manner: (1) Is the complaint a general statement against the Project? (2) Is the complaint specific to a property, methodology of landowner contact, action, or discussion point made by the Transco Land Department? If the complaint is general in nature, Transco does not directly address the issue. It may, or may not be, noted in a contact report depending upon the method in which the complaint is received. If the complaint is specific as identified above, then it is further reviewed to understand the basis and nature of the complaint. A land agent will investigate the complaint, typically within 24 hours of receipt. This includes directly contacting the landowner to understand the specific concern. The landowner consultation will include the landowner’s opinion of a possible resolution. This is noted and made a part of Transco Team discussions. Define the Complaint Transco will review a complaint from the original source and define the specific cause or issue. An agent will attempt to contact the landowner within 24 hours of receiving a complaint. The agent and landowner will discuss the specifics of the complaint via phone or set an in-person meeting. If contact is not possible within 24 hours Transco continues to attempt to contact the landowner in person for the ensuing 24 hours. After 48 hours, other methods, such as email or mailing to the last known address, will be considered on a case by case basis.

Record the Complaint All complaints reported by an affected landowner(s) are documented through a formal contact report. Each landowner/tract is assigned a contact report for each contact made with a land agent. All FERC complaints are cross referenced against the landowner database and reported as either affected or not affected.

Resolution is Determined All complaints are reviewed to determine if and how the land group can address the identified concerns. Some resolutions may require assistance from other Project disciplines. These discipline team leads will be involved in the plan decision for resolution.

Resolution is Implemented All tasks that require action are assigned to those involved, and the resolution plan is developed and implemented. The Project Land Lead is responsible for managing the resolution process. Other Team Leads and Land Supervisors are responsible for the plan execution.

Landowner Follow-up Prior to the implementation of the resolution or response plan, a follow-up contact with the complainant will be conducted to answer any subsequent questions or concerns. We will explain our reasoning in our decision. At this point, the issue is considered to be settled.

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT LANDOWNER COMPLAINT CALL LOG

Date of Call Loop Name L.L. No. Landowner Name Problem/Concern Action Taken & Date

Page 1 of 2

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT LANDOWNER COMPLAINT CALL LOG

Date of Call Loop Name L.L. No. Landowner Name Problem/Concern Action Taken & Date

Page 2 of 2


Tel: 570-208-9860 Date Name Address «City», «State» «Zip» RE: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, Atlantic Sunrise Project.

FERC Docket Number CP__________ Dear _______________: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco) has received authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct its Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline Project. Construction of the Project is expected to begin on or about the week of _______, 2016. We understand that construction of the pipeline and/or restoration of the right of way may raise concerns for some landowners. Should you have questions or concerns during construction or restoration activities on your property, please call Transco’s local Land Office at (570) 208-9860 or toll free at (844) 785-0455. This office is staffed during normal business hours and your question/concern will be directed to the appropriate person. Should you receive a recorded message, please leave your name and phone number and a Transco Land Representative will return your call promptly. A response to your question/concern can be expected within 24 to 48 hours. If you do not receive a satisfactory response to your question/concern, you should call the Transco’s Project Hotline at (866) 455-9103. A response to your call can be expected within 24 to 48 hours. If a satisfactory response to your concern still has not been provided, you may call the FERC through their toll free Dispute Resolution Service Helpline at (877) 337-2237, by email at [email protected], or by writing to the Dispute Resolution Service, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Please include the docket number referenced at the top of this letter when communicating with FERC. Following this procedure will provide the most efficient and effective response to your question/concern. The local Land Representative will be the most knowledgeable about the details of the construction and restoration activities conducted on your property. Calls to either of the Hotline numbers should only be made if the response from the local Land Representative is not satisfactory. Sincerely, Land Representative Project- Right of Way Manager

mailto:[email protected]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.AERIAL ROUTE MAP

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 30" CENTRAL PENN LINE NORTH

M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96COLUMBIA, LUZERNE, WYOMING & SUSQUEHANNA

COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/25/2014 REV. A

F-AM-CPLN-A

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A2:52 PM

Z:\1_Beta_Projects\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\Key Map\KEY_MAP_FERC_CPLNorth_AerialRouteMap.mxd

4/25/2014

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:

ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION:

ISSUE FOR BID: SCALE: NOTEDW.O. NO. CHK. APP.NO. DATE BY

DRAWING NO.

DATE:

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.AERIAL ROUTE MAP


M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE

REVISION DESCRIPTION

ISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILING

4/25/2014

4/25/2014A IAM4/25/2014CPL SOUTHCPL SOUTH0 4,000 8,000 12,000

UNITS IN FEETSHEET 1B OF 50

LegendPROPOSED PIPELINETOWNSHIP LINECOUNTY LINE

SUGARLOAF, FARIMONT & ROSS TOWNSHIPS COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES

1161481

1161481

WGM

FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLYSUBJECT TO REVISION

PRELIMINARY4/25/2014

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A2:52 PM


4/25/2014

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


UNITS IN FEETSHEET 1C OF 50


ROSS, LAKE, LEHMAN & DALLS TOWNSHIPS LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM



DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A2:52 PM


4/25/2014

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96LUZERNE & WYOMING COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


UNITS IN FEETSHEET 1D OF 50


DALLAS, MONROE, NORTHUMBERLAND, EATON & FALLS TOWNSHIPS LUZERNE & WYOMING COUNTIES

1161481

1161481

WGM



DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A2:52 PM


4/25/2014

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96WYOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


UNITS IN FEETSHEET 1E OF 50


FALLS, OVERFIELD,CLINTON & NICHOLSON TOWNSHIPS WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM



DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A2:52 PM


4/25/2014

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96WYOMING & SUSQUEHANNA CO., PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


UNITS IN FEETSHEET 1F OF 50


NICHOLSON & LENOX TOWNSHIPS WYOMING & SUSQUEHANNA CO.

1161481

1161481

WGM



DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:24 PM

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_CPLNorth_AerialRouteMap.mxd

4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96COLUMBIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014CPL SOUTHCPL SOUTHSUGARLOAF TOWNSHIP,COLUMBIA COUNTY0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

SHEET 1 OF 50

LegendPROPOSED PIPELINE

") PROPOSED 605 COMPRESSOR STATION

600ft SURVEY COORIDOR

RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS

EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "A"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "B"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "C"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "D"

STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

SUGARLOAF TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:25 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 2 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:25 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 3 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:25 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 4 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:26 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 5 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

SUGARLOAF & FAIRMOUNT TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:26 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 6 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

FAIRMOUNT TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:27 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 7 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:28 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 8 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:28 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 9 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:29 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 10 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

FAIRMOUNT & ROSS TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:30 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 11 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

ROSS TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:30 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 12 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:31 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 13 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:32 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 14 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

ROSS & LAKE TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:33 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 15 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

LAKE TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:33 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 16 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:34 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 17 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:35 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 18 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

LAKE & LEHMAN TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:36 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 19 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

LEHMAN TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:36 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 20 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

LEHMAN TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:37 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 21 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

LEHMAN & DALLAS TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:38 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 22 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

DALLAS TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:39 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 23 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

DALLAS TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:40 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 24 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

DALLAS & MONROE TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE & WYOMING COUNTIES

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:40 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 25 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

DALLAS, MONROE & NORTHMORELAND TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE & WYOMING COUNTIES

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:41 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 26 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

NORTHMORELAND TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:42 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 27 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:43 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 28 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:43 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 29 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

NORTHMORELAND & EATON TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:44 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 30 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

EATON TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:45 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 31 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

EATON & FALLS TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:46 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 32 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

FALLS TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:47 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 33 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

FALLS & OVERFIELD TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:47 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 34 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

OVERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:48 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 35 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

OVERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:49 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 36 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

OVERFIELD & CLINTON TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:50 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 37 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

CLINTON TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:51 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 38 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:52 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 39 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:52 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 40 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

CLINTON & NICHOLSON TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:54 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 41 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

NICHOLSON TOWNSHIP, WYOMING COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:54 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 42 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:55 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 43 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:56 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96WYOMING & SUSQUEHANNA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 44 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

NICHOLSON & LENOX TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING & SUSQUEHANNA COUNTIES

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:56 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 45 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

LENOX TOWNSHIP, SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY

1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:57 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 46 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:58 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 47 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A8:59 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 48 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A9:00 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 49 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLN-A9:00 PM


4/25/2014



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


SHEET 50 OF 50




RAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS


1161481

1161481

WGM


ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 42" CENTRAL PENN LINE SOUTH

M.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 121.28LANCASTER, LEBANON, SCHUYLKILL, NORTHUMBERLAND

& COLUMBIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/25/2014 REV. A

F-AM-CPLS-A

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:45 PM4/25/2014

Z:\1_Beta_Projects\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\Key Map\KEY_MAP_FERC_CPLSouth_AerialRouteMap.mxd

DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SUGARLOAF TOWNSHIP,COLUMBIA COUNTY

0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

DRUMORE, MARTIC, CONESTOGA & MANOR TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 1B OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:46 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

MANOR, WEST HEMPFIELD & EAST DONEGAL TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 1C OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28LANCASTER & LEBANON COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

EAST DONEGAL, MOUNT JOY & SOUTH LONDONDERRY TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER & LEBANON COUNTIES

SHEET 1D OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

SOUTH LONDONDERRY, SOUTH ANNVILLE, ANNVILLE, NORTH ANNVILLE & EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 1E OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28LEBANON & SCHUYLKILL COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

EAST HANOVER, UNION & PINE GROVE TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON & SCHUYLKILL COUNTIES

SHEET 1F OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28SCHUYLKILL COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

PINE GROVE, TREMONT, FRAILEY, HEGINS & ELDRED TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 1G OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28SCHUYLKILL, NORTHUMBERLAND & COLUMBIA CO., PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

ELDRED, EAST CAMERON,COAL, RALPHO & CLEVELAND TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL, NORTHUMBERLAND & COLUMBIA CO.

SHEET 1H OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28COLUMBIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

CLEVELAND, FRANKLIN, MONTOUR & HEMLOCK TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 1I OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

HEMLOCK, MOUNT PLEASANT, GREENWOOD & ORANGE TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 1J OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A2:47 PM4/25/2014


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 4,000 8,000 12,000UNITS IN FEET

GREENWOOD, JACKSON & SUGARLOAF TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 1K OF 109


1161503



1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:26 PM4/25/2014

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_CPLSouth_AerialRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

DRUMORE TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 1 OF 109


") PROPOSED 610 COMPRESSOR STATION600ft SURVEY COORIDOR LINERAILROADSTOWNSHIP LINECOUNTY LINECITY LIMITSSTATE PARKSSTATE GAMELANDS

STATE FORESTMAINLINE "A"MAINLINE "B"MAINLINE "C"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "A"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "B"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "C"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "D" 1161503

1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:27 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

DRUMORE & MARTIC TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 2 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

tF-AM-CPLS-A

8:27 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MARTIC TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 3 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:27 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 4 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:28 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 5 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:28 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 6 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:29 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MARTIC & CONESTOGA TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 7 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:29 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MARTIC & CONESTOGA TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 8 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:30 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 9 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:30 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 10 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:31 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

CONESTOGA & MANOR TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 11 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:31 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MANOR TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 12 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:31 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 13 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:32 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 14 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:32 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 15 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:32 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 16 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:33 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MANOR & WEST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 17 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:33 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

WEST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 18 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:34 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 19 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:34 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 20 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:35 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 21 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:35 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

WEST HEMPFIELD & EAST DONEGAL TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 22 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:35 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST DONEGAL TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 23 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:36 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 24 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:36 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 25 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:37 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST DONEGAL & MOUNT JOY TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 26 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:37 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MOUNT JOY TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY

SHEET 27 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:38 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 28 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:38 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 29 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:39 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 30 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:39 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28LANCASTER & LEBANON COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MOUNT JOY & SOUTH LONDONDERRY TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER & LEBANON COUNTIES

SHEET 31 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:40 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

SOUTH LONDONDERRY TOWNSHIP, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 32 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:41 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 33 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:41 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 34 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:42 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

SOUTH LONDONDERRY & SOUTH ANNVILLE TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 35 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:43 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

SOUTH ANNVILLE TOWNSHIP, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 36 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:43 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 37 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:44 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 38 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:45 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 39 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:46 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

SOUTH & NORTH ANNVILLE & ANNVILLE TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 40 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:46 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

NORTH ANNVILLE TOWNSHIP, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 41 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:47 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

NORTH ANNVILLE & EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 42 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:48 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 43 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:48 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 44 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:49 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST HANOVER & UNION TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 45 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:49 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

UNION TOWNSHIP, LEBANON COUNTY

SHEET 46 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:50 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 47 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:51 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 48 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:52 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 49 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:52 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 50 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:53 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 51 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:54 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 52 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:55 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 53 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:56 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 54 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:56 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28LEBANON & SCHUYLKILL COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

UNION & PINE GROVE TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON & SCHUYLKILL COUNTIES

SHEET 55 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:57 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

PINE GROVE TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 56 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:58 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 57 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A8:59 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 58 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:00 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 59 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:00 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

PINE GROVE & TREMONT TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 60 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:01 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

TREMONT TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 61 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:02 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

TREMONT & FRAILEY TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 62 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:02 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

FRAILEY TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 63 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:03 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

FRAILEY & HEGINS TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 64 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:04 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

HEGINS TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 65 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:05 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

HEGINS TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 66 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:05 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

HEGINS & ELDRED TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 67 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:06 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

ELDRED TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 68 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:07 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

ELDRED TOWNSHIP, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

SHEET 69 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:08 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28SCHUYLKILL & NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

ELDRED & EAST CAMERON TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL & NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTIES

SHEET 70 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:08 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST CAMERON TOWNSHIP, NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY

SHEET 71 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:09 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

EAST CAMERON & COAL TOWNSHIPS, NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY

SHEET 72 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:10 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

COAL TOWNSHIP, NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY

SHEET 73 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:10 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 74 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:11 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 75 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:12 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 76 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:12 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



M.P. 0.00 TO 121.28NORTHUMBERLAND & COLUMBIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

COAL, RALPHO & CLEVELAND TOWNSHIPS, NORTHUMBERLAND & COLUMBIA COUNTIES

SHEET 77 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:13 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

CLEVELAND TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 78 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:14 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 79 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:14 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 80 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:15 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

CLEVELAND & FRANKLIN TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 81 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:16 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 82 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:16 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 83 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:17 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 84 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:18 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

FRANKLIN & MONTOUR TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 85 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:18 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MONTOUR TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 86 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:20 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MONTOUR TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 87 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:21 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MONTOUR & HEMLOCK TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 88 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:21 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

HEMLOCK TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 89 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:22 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 90 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:23 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 91 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:24 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

HEMLOCK & MOUNT PLEASANT TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 92 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:24 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

MOUNT PLEASANT TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 93 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:25 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 94 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:25 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 95 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:26 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 96 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:26 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 97 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:27 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

ORANGE & GREENWOOD TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 98 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:28 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

GREENWOOD TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 99 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:28 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 100 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:30 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 101 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:30 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 102 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:31 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

GREENWOOD & JACKSON TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 103 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:31 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

JACKSON TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 104 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:32 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 105 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:32 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 106 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:33 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 107 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:34 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET


SHEET 108 OF 109




1161503

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-CPLS-A9:34 PM4/25/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014


0 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

JACKSON & SUGARLOAF TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA COUNTY

SHEET 109 OF 109




1161503


ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 36" GRUGAN LOOP

M.P. L171.84 TO M.P. L177.29CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/28/2014 REV. A

F-AM-LL-171.8-E

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-171.8-E12:26 PM4/28/2014

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\Key Map\KEY_MAP_FERC_Grugan_AerialRouteMap.mxd

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:


ISSUE FOR BID: SCALE: NOTEDW.O. NO. CHK. APP.DATE BY

DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014

4/28/2014A IAM4/28/20140 3,000 6,000 9,000UNITS IN FEET

GRUGAN & GALLAGHER TOWNSHIPS, CLINTON COUNTY

SHEET 1B OF 6




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM

GRUG

AN TO

WNSH

IPGA

LLAG

HER T

OWNS

HIP

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-171.8-E11:15 AM4/28/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Grugan_AerialRouteMap.mxd

DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014

4/28/2014A CNC4/28/20140 400 800 1,200UNITS IN FEET

GRUGAN & GALLAGHER TOWNSHIPS, CLINTON COUNTY

SHEET 1 OF 6


600ft SURVEY CORRIDOR

TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


GALLAGHER TOWNSHIP, CLINTON COUNTY

SHEET 2 OF 6



TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 3 OF 6



TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 4 OF 6



TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 5 OF 6



TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t


DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 6 OF 6



TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST




NO.

1161125

1161125

WGM


ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 42" D LINE UNITY LOOPM.P. L119.87 TO M.P. L128.87LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/28/2014 REV. A

F-AM-LL-119.8-D

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:54 AM4/28/2014

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\Key Map\KEY_MAP_FERC_Unity_AerialRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:


ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 42" D LINE UNITY LOOP

M.P. L119.87 TO M.P. L128.87LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


PENN, FRANKLIN & JORDAN TOWNSHIPS, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 1B OF 9


TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:22 AM4/28/2014

Z:\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Unity_AerialRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


PENN TOWNSHIP, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 1 OF 9


600ft SURVEY CORRIDORRAILROADS

TOWNSHIP LINECOUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:22 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 2 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:22 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 3 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:22 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 4 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:23 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014



SHEET 5 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:23 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


PENN & FRANKLIN TOWNSHIPS, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 6 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:23 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 7 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:23 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


FRANKLIN & JORDAN TOWNSHIPS, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 8 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-LL-119.8-D11:24 AM4/28/2014




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


JORDAN TOWNSHIP, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 9 OF 9




CITY LIMITS


1161145

1161145


ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 30" MAINLINE "A" & "B" VA REPLACEMENTS

M.P. 1578.35 TO M.P. 1583.5PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DATE 4/25/2014 REV. A

F-AM-1578.7-AB

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-1578.7-AB3:36 PM4/25/2014

Z:\1_Beta_Projects\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\Key Map\KEY_MAP_FERC_Replacement_AerialRouteMap.mxd

DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:


ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 30" MAINLINE "A & B" VA REPLACEMENTS


REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


BRENTSVILLE & GAINESVILLE DISTRICTS,PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET 1BOF 5


DISTRICT BOUNDARYCOUNTY LINE

1161536

1161536



DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-AM-1578.7-AB8:47 PM4/25/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Replacement_AerialRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


BRENTSVILLE DISTRICT, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET 1 OF 5


600ft SURVEY CORRIDOR LINE

RAILROADS

NATIONAL PARK

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS

DISTRICT BOUNDARY

MAINLINE "A"MAINLINE "B"MAINLINE "C"

1161536

1161536

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


BRENTSVILLE DISTRICT, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET 2 OF 5



RAILROADS

NATIONAL PARK

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS

DISTRICT BOUNDARY


1161536

1161536

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


BRENTSVILLE & GAINESVILLE DISTRICTS, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET 3 OF 5



RAILROADS

NATIONAL PARK

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS

DISTRICT BOUNDARY


1161536

1161536

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


GAINESVILLE DISTRICT, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET 4 OF 5



RAILROADS

NATIONAL PARK

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS

DISTRICT BOUNDARY


1161536

1161536

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


GAINESVILLE DISTRICT, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET 5 OF 5



RAILROADS

NATIONAL PARK

COUNTY LINE

CITY LIMITS

DISTRICT BOUNDARY


1161536

1161536

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.TOPOGRAPHIC ROUTE MAPATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT

PROPOSED 30" CENTRAL PENN LINE NORTHM.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 55.96

COLUMBIA, LUZERNE, WYOMING & SUSQUEHANNACOUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/25/2014 REV. A

F-TM-CPLN-A

")

!(

!(

!( !(!(

!( !(

CPL South

STA. 517

StateGameland

013

0.000.50

1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-TM-CPLN-A8:49 AM4/25/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_CPLNorth_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.TOPOGRAPHICAL ROUTE MAPATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT


COLUMBIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 1 OF 11


") PROPOSED 605 COMPRESSOR STATION600ft SURVEY COORIDORRAILROADSSTATE PARKSSTATE GAMELANDS


0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

ELK GROVE, PARED ROCK, PA

NOTES:DRG 7.5 MIN. QUAD MAPS:

WGM1161481

1161481


")

!(

!( !(!(

!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(

!(

!(

RickettsGlen-STATE

PARK

State Gameland 013

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 2 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET



WGM1161481

1161481

SUGARLOAF & FAIRMOUNT TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES

")

!(!( !( !(

!(!( !( !(

!( !( !(!(

!(

!(

!( !(!(

RickettsGlen-STATE

PARK

StateGameland

206

StateGameland

057

7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.0011.50

12.0012.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 3 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

RED ROCK, PASWEET VALLEY, PA


WGM1161481

1161481

FAIRMOUNT & ROSS TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

!(!(

!( !(

!(!( !( !(

!(!( !(

!( !( !(!(

StateGameland

206

12.00 12.50 13.0013.50 14.00 14.50 15.00 15.50 16.00 16.50

17.00 17.50 18.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 4 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

SWEET VALLEY, PAHARVEY LAKE, PA


WGM1161481

1161481

ROSS & LAKE TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

17.5018.00

18.50

19.00

19.50

20.00

20.50 21.00

21.50

22.00

22.50

23.00

23.50

24.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 5 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

HARVEY LAKE, PAKINGSTON, PA


WGM1161481

1161481

LAKE, LEHMAN & DALLAS TOWNSHIPS, LUZERNE COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

22.50

23.00 23.50 24.0024.50 25.00

25.50 26.00

26.5027.00

27.5028.00 28.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



WYOMING & LUZERNE COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 6 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

HARVEY LAKE, PAKINGSTON, PA


CENTER MORELAND, PA

WGM1161481

1161481

DALLAS, MONROE & NORTHMORELAND TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING & LUZERNE COUNTIES

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

28.50 29.00 29.5030.00

30.50 31.00 31.50

32.00

32.50 33.00

33.50

34.00

34.50 35.00

SpringvilleInterconnect

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



WYOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 7 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

CENTER MORELAND, PA


WGM1161481

1161481

NORTHMORELAND & EATON TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!( !(

!(

34.5035.00 35.50

36.00

36.50 37.00

37.50

38.0038.50

39.00

39.5040.00 40.50 41.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 8 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

CENTER MORELAND, PARANSOM, PA


FACTORYVILLE, PA

WGM1161481

1161481

FALLS. OVERFIELD & CLINTON TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

605 COMPRESSORSTATION(Option 3)

40.50 41.00 41.5042.00 42.50

43.00

43.50 44.00 44.50

45.0045.50 46.00 46.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 9 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

FACTORYVILLE, PA


WGM1161481

1161481

OVERFIELD, CLINTON & NICHOLSON TOWNSHIPS, WYOMING COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( ")

")

605 COMPRESSORSTATION(Option 2)

46.5047.00

47.50

48.00

48.5049.00

49.5050.00

50.50

51.00

51.50 52.00

52.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



SUSQUEHANNA & WYOMING COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 10 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

FACTORYVILLE, PAHOP BOTTOM, PA


LENOXVILLE, PA

WGM1161481

1161481

NICHOLSON & LENOX TOWNSHIPS, SUSQUEHANNA & WYOMING COUNTIES

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(

")

")

605 COMPRESSORSTATION(Preferred)

52.50

53.0053.50 54.00

54.50 55.00

55.50

55.96

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014

SHEET 11 OF 11




0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

LENOXVILLE, PA


WGM1161481

1161481



PROPOSED 42" CENTRAL PENN LINE SOUTHM.P. 0.00 TO M.P. 121.28

LANCASTER, LEBANON, SCHUYLKILL, NORTHUMBERLAND& COLUMBIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/25/2014 REV. A

F-TM-CPLS-A

")

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

StateGameland

288

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.503.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.005.50

6.00

6.507.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:t

F-TM-CPLS-A11:13 AM4/25/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_CPLSouth_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:


PROPOSED 42" CENTRAL PENN LINE SOUTHM.P. 0.00 TO 121.28

LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014

4/25/2014A CNC4/25/2014CPL SOUTHCPL SOUTHCPL SOUTHSUGARLOAF TOWNSHIP,COLUMBIA COUNTYSHEET 1 OF 21



600ft SURVEY COORIDOR LINE

RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

HOLTWOOD, PACONESTOGA, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

DRUMORE & MARTIC TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(Susquehannock-STATE PARK

StateGameland

288

7.00 7.50 8.00 8.509.00

9.5010.00

10.5011.00 11.50

12.00

12.50

13.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

CONESTOGA, PASAFE HARBOR, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

MARTIC, CONSETOGA & MANOR TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

13.00 13.5014.00

14.50

15.00 15.5016.00

16.50

17.00

17.50

18.00

18.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

SAFE HARBOR, PACOLUMBIA EAST, PA


WGM1161503

1161503


!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

18.50

19.00

19.50

20.00

20.5021.00

21.50 22.00 22.50

23.00

23.50

24.00

24.5025.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

COLUMBIA EAST, PACOLUMBIA WEST, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

MANOR, WEST HEMPFIELD & EAST DONEGAL TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

25.0025.50 26.00 26.50 27.00

27.5028.00

28.50 29.00 29.5030.00

30.50

31.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

COLUMBIA WEST, PAELIZABETHTOWN, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

EAST DONEGAL & MOUNT JOY TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

StateGameland

145

31.00

31.5032.00

32.50

33.0033.50

34.00 34.50

35.00

35.50

36.00 36.50

37.0037.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



LANCASTER & LEBANON COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

ELIZABETHTOWN, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

MOUNT JOY & SOUTH LONDONDERRY TOWNSHIPS, LANCASTER & LEBANON COUNTIES

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

StateGameland

145

37.50 38.00 38.50

39.00

39.5040.00

40.5041.00

41.50

42.0042.50

43.0043.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

ELIZABETHTOWN, PAPALMYRA, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

SOUTH LONDONDERRY & SOUTH ANNVILLE TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

43.50

44.00 44.50 45.0045.50

46.00 46.5047.00 47.50 48.00 48.50

49.00 49.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

PALMYRA, PAINDIANTOWN GAP, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

S. & N. ANNVILLE, ANNVILLE & E. HANOVER TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Swatara-STATEPARK

49.5050.00

50.50 51.0051.50

52.00 52.5053.00

53.5054.00

54.50

55.00

55.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

INDIANTOWN GAP, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

EAST HANOVER & UNION TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Swatara-STATEPARK

StateGameland

080

StateGameland

211

APPALAC HIANTRAIL

55.00

55.50

56.00

56.50

57.00

57.50

58.00

58.50

59.00

59.50

60.00

60.50

61.00

61.50

62.00

62.50

63.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

INDIANTOWN GAP, PATOWER CITY, PA


PINE GROVE, PA

WGM1161503

1161503

UNION & PINE GROVE TOWNSHIPS, LEBANON COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

Swatara-STATEPARK

StateGameland

080

StateGameland

229

StateGameland

211

63.0063.50 64.00 64.50 65.00

65.50 66.0066.50

67.00 67.5068.00

68.50

69.00

69.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



SCHUYLKILL COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

PINE GROVE, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

PINE GROVE & TREMONT TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

!(!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

StateGameland

229

StateGameland

211

68.5069.00 69.50 70.00 70.50

71.0071.50 72.00

72.5073.00 73.50 74.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

PINE GROVE, PATREMONT, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

TREMONT, FRAILEY & HEGINS TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

StateGameland

084

StateGameland

13274.0074.50

75.0075.50

76.0076.50

77.0077.50

78.0078.50 79.00 79.50

80.00

WeiserForest

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

TREMONT, PAVALLEY VIEW, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

HEGINS & ELDRED TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

StateGameland

084

80.00

80.50

81.0081.50

82.0082.50

83.0083.50 84.00 84.50 85.00

85.50

WeiserForest

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



SCHUYLKILL & NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

VALLEY VIEW, PATREMONT, PA


MOUNT CARMEL, PA

WGM1161503

1161503

ELDRED, EAST CAMERON & COAL TOWNSHIPS, SCHUYLKILL & NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTIES

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

85.5086.00

86.5087.00

87.50

88.00

88.50 89.00 89.50 90.0090.50

91.0091.50

WeiserForest

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



NORTHUMBERLAND & COLUMBIA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

SHAMOKIN, PAMOUNT CARMEL, PA


CATAWISSA, PA

WGM1161503

1161503

COAL, RALPHO & CLEVELAND TOWNSHIPS, NORTHUMBERLAND & COLUMBIA COUNTIES

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

91.5092.00

92.50 93.00 93.50

94.00 94.50 95.0095.50

96.0096.50

97.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

CATAWISSA, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

CLEVELAND, FRANKLIN & MONTOUR TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

")

610 COMPRESSORSTATION

PREFERRED

610 COMPRESSORSTATIONOPTION 2

97.00

97.50

98.0098.50 99.00 99.50

100.00

100.50 101.00101.50

102.00

102.50 103.00

103.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

CATAWISSA, PADANVILLE, PA


MILLVILLE, PA

WGM1161503

1161503

MONTOUR & HEMLOCK TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

610 COMPRESSORSTATIONOPTION 3

103.50104.00

104.50 105.00105.50

106.00106.50

107.00 107.50 108.00 108.50109.00

WeiserForest

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

BLOOMSBURG, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

HEMLOCK, MOUNT PLEASANT & ORANGE TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

")

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

109.00109.50

110.00 110.50

111.00 111.50112.00

112.50

113.00

113.50 114.00 114.50 115.00

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

BLOOMSBURG, PABENTON, PA


WGM1161503

1161503

ORANGE, GREENWOOD & JACKSON TOWNSHIPS, COLUMBIA COUNTY

")

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(

!(

CPL NORTH

STA. 517

115.00 115.50116.00

116.50 117.00

117.50118.00

118.50 119.00 119.50 120.00

120.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET

BENTON, PAELK GROVE, PA


WGM1161503

1161503


")

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

CPL NORTH

RickettsGlen-STATE

PARK

StateGameland

013

120.50 121.00 121.28

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t




DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:



COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014





RAILROADS



STATE PARKS

STATE GAMELANDS

STATE FOREST0 2,000 4,000 6,000

UNITS IN FEET



WGM1161503

1161503

JACKSON TOWNSHIP, COLUMBIA & LUZERNE COUNTIES

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.TOPOGRAPHIC ROUTE MAPATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 36" GRUGAN LOOP


DATE 4/28/2014 REV. A

F-TM-LL-171.8-E

!(!(

!(!(

!(!(

!(!(!(

!(!(!( !(

StateGameland

089

172172.5173173.5174174.5

175175.5176176.5177177.29 171.84

SproulForest

SproulForest

SproulForest

TiadaghtonForest

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-TM-LL-171.8-E11:04 AM4/28/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Grugan_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.TOPOGRAPHICAL ROUTE MAPATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTPROPOSED 36" GRUGAN LOOP

M.P. 171.84 TO 177.29CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014

4/28/2014A CNC4/28/2014CPL SOUTH

SUGARLOAF TOWNSHIP,COLUMBIA COUNTYSHEET OF

0 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

GLEN UNION, PAJERSEY MILLS, PA


WGM1161125

1161125


LegendPROPOSED PIPELINE600ft SURVEY CORRIDORSTATE GAMELANDSSTATE FORESTEXIST. LEIDY LOOP "A"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "B"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "C"EXIST. LEIDY LOOP "D"


PROPOSED 42" D LINE UNITY LOOPM.P. L119.87 TO M.P. L128.87LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

DATE 4/28/2014 REV. A

F-TM-LL-119.8-D

FRAN

KLIN

TOWN

SHIP

JORD

AN TO

WNSH

IP

PENN

TOWN

SHIP

FRAN

KLIN

TOWN

SHIP

21

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-TM-LL-119.8-D3:18 PM4/28/2014

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\Key Map\KEY_MAP_FERC_Unity_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: IAM

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:


PROPOSED 42" D LINE UNITY LOOPM.P. L119.87 TO M.P. L128.87

LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


PENN, FRANKLIN & JORDAN TOWNSHIPS, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 1B OF 2


TOWNSHIP LINE

COUNTY LINE

1161145

1161145

!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(

!(!(!(!(

123.50124.00124.50125.00125.50126.00126.50127.00127.50128.00128.50128.87

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-TM-LL-119.8-D11:26 AM4/28/2014

Z:\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Unity_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014

4/28/2014A CNC4/28/20140 2,000 4,000 6,000UNITS IN FEET

FRANKLIN & PENN TOWNSHIPS, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 1 OF 2


600ft SURVEY CORRIDORSTATE GAMELANDS


1161145

1161145

PICTURE ROCKS, PASONESTOWN, PA


")

!(!(!(!(!(!(

!(!(

!(

!(

119.87

StateGameland 013

120.00120.50121.00121.50122.00122.50123.00123.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-TM-LL-119.8-D11:26 AM4/28/2014

Z:\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Unity_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:




REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014


JORDAN & FRANKLIN TOWNSHIPS, LYCOMING COUNTY

SHEET 2 OF 2


600ft SURVEY CORRIDORSTATE GAMELANDS


1161145

1161145

SONESTOWN, PAELK GROVE, PA



PROPOSED 30" MAINLINE "A" & "B" VA REPLACEMENTSM.P. 1578.35 TO M.P. 1583.5

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DATE 4/25/2014 REV. A

F-TM-1578.7-AB

")

!(

!(

!( !( !( !( !(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

1578.35

1578.5 1579 1579.5 1580 1580.5 1581 1581.5 1582 1582.5 1583 1583.5

ManassasNational

Battlefield Park

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-TM-1578.7-AB7:00 PM4/25/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\FERC\FERC_Replacement_TopoRouteMap.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

WGMCHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:


PROPOSED 30" MAINLINE "A & B" VA REPLACEMENTSM.P. 1578.35 TO M.P. 1583.5

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA

REFERENCE TITLE



4/25/2014


BRANTSVILLE & GAINESVILLE DISTRICTS, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

SHEET OF



NATIONAL PARKS


1161536

1161536

GAINESVILLE, VA


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

Summary of Alternatives Considered

Atlantic Sunrise Project

April 2014

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1

2 SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................. 2

3 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE................................................................................................... 2

4 ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO MEET THE PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES .......................... 3

5 SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................................................... 3

6 ROUTE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................ 4

6.1 ROUTE START AND ENDPOINTS ........................................................................................... 5

6.2 ROUTE SELECTION ............................................................................................................. 6

6.2.1 CPL North ..................................................................................................................... 8

6.2.2 CPL South .................................................................................................................... 8

6.3 MAJOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................ 8

6.3.1 Diamond CPL North Alternative .................................................................................... 8

6.3.2 Williams Midstream CPL North Alternative ................................................................... 9

6.3.3 Transco Looping CPL South Alternative ....................................................................... 9

6.3.4 Western CPL South Alternative .................................................................................. 10

6.4 MINOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................... 11

6.4.1 CPL North Alternative 1 .............................................................................................. 13

6.4.2 CPL North Alternative 2 .............................................................................................. 15

6.4.3 CPL South Alternative 1 ............................................................................................. 15



6.5 ROUTE DEVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... 16

6.6 ADDITIONAL REFINEMENT OF CPL NORTH AND CPL SOUTH ROUTES ................................ 16

7 PIPELINE LOOPS AND PIPELINE REPLACEMENT ................................................................. 18

7.1 PRIMARY ROUTE IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION ............................................................. 18

7.1.1 Grugan Loop ............................................................................................................... 18

7.1.2 Unity Loop ................................................................................................................... 19

7.1.3 Mainline A and B Replacements ................................................................................. 19

7.2 MAJOR, MINOR AND ROUTE DEVIATION ALTERNATIVES: PIPELINE LOOPS AND PIPELINE REPLACEMENT ................................................................................................................. 19

8 COMPRESSOR STATION ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................ 20


iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table Example Route Alternatives Comparison ......................................................................... 11

Table Example Comparison of Compressor Station Option Sites .............................................. 22

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 6.2-1 Major Route Alternatives, Atlantic Sunrise Project, Pennsylvania and

New Jersey ............................................................................................................ 7

Figure 6.4-1 Minor Route Alternatives, Atlantic Sunrise Project, Pennsylvania ....................... 14

Figure 6.5-1 Tucquan Glen Route Deviation, Atlantic Sunrise Project, 42” Central

Penn Line South Primary Route, MP 4.43 to 6.80, Lancaster County,

Pennsylvania ....................................................................................................... 17

Figure 7.2-1 Grugan Loop Alternative 1, Atlantic Sunrise Project, Pennsylvania .................... 21

Figure 8-1 Options for Compressor Station 605 Location Map, Atlantic Sunrise

Project, Wyoming and Susquehanna Counties, Pennsylvania ............................ 24

Figure 8-2 Options for Compressor Station 610 Location Map, Atlantic Sunrise

Project, Columbia County, Pennsylvania ............................................................ 25


iv

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Certificate Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

Commission or FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

CPL Central Penn Line

Dth/d dekatherms per day

GIS geographic information systems

HDD horizontal directional drill

hp horsepower

MMDth/d million dekatherms per day

MLV mainline valve

NPS National Parks Service

NWI National Wetlands Inventory

Project Atlantic Sunrise Project

ROW right-of-way

RR Resource Report

Transco Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

USGS U.S. Geological Survey

WILLIAMS Williams Partners L.P.


1

1 INTRODUCTION

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco), a subsidiary of Williams

Partners L.P. (Williams), will file an application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and

Necessity (Certificate) with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission)

for the proposed Atlantic Sunrise Project (Project). The Project is an expansion of Transco’s

existing natural gas transmission system that will enable Transco to provide 1.7 million

dekatherms per day (MMDth/d) of incremental firm transportation capacity for growing supplies

of natural gas from northern Pennsylvania to various delivery points along the Transco Mainline

system to as far south as the Station 85 Pooling Points1 in Choctaw County, Alabama. The

Project consists of the following primary components:

• Approximately 177.3 miles of new 30-inch and 42-inch diameter greenfield

pipelines in Pennsylvania;

• Approximately 14.5 miles of new 36-inch and 42-inch diameter pipeline loops in

Pennsylvania;

• Two new compressor stations in Pennsylvania;

• Additional ancillary facilities, such as mainline valves (MLVs), cathodic

protection, communication towers, and internal inspection device launchers and

receivers in Pennsylvania;


stations in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia;

• Two new meter stations with interconnecting piping in Pennsylvania;

• Three new regulator stations with interconnecting piping in Pennsylvania;

• Approximately 2.5 miles of 30-inch diameter pipeline replacements in Virginia;

• Modifications to six existing compressor stations that enable compression for bi-

directional flow, and/or supplemental odorization, odor detection, and/or odor

masking/deodorization equipment in Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina; and

• Supplemental odorization, odor detection, and odor masking/deodorization

equipment, at various meter stations, and valve sites in North Carolina and South

Carolina.

1 A pooling point defines the aggregation of gas from multiple physical and/or virtual receipt points to a single physical or virtual point; and the disaggregation of gas from a single physical or virtual point to multiple physical and/or virtual delivery points.


2

Should the FERC certificate the Project and upon receipt of necessary permits and

authorizations, Transco anticipates construction of the Project would commence in June 2016 to

meet an in-service date of July 1, 2017.

This Summary of Alternatives describes the alternatives that Transco has considered or

are under consideration for the Project. (Transco will provide additional analysis of these

alternatives and any others identified during scoping in Resource Report (RR) 10, anticipated to

be submitted in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

2 SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES

Transco is submitting this summary of the alternatives considered or under consideration

in accordance with 18 CFR § 157.21(f)(5) of the pre-filing procedures and review process for

natural gas facilities under FERC jurisdiction prior to filing its application. Transco anticipates

submittal of draft RR 10 in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014, which will address, at a minimum, the

following:

• A detailed “no-action” alternative (§ 380.12(l)(1));

• The effect of energy conservation or energy alternatives to the Project

(§ 380.12(l)(1));

• Further discussion of system alternatives considered during the identification of

the Project with rationale for rejecting each alternative (§ 380.12(l)(1));

• Further discussion of major and minor route alternatives considered to avoid

impact on sensitive environmental areas (e.g., wetlands, parks, or residences),

including sufficient comparative data to justify the selection of the proposed route

(§ 380.12(l)(2)(ii)); and

• Further discussion of alternative sites considered for the location of major new

aboveground facilities with sufficient comparative data to justify the selection of

the proposed sites (§ 380.12(l)(2)(ii)).

3 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE

The “No-Action” alternative for the Project will describe the benefits/consequences of not

constructing the Project. For example, if Transco does not construct the planned facilities,

temporary and permanent environmental impacts associated with construction and operation

would be avoided. However, by not constructing the proposed Project, Transco would not be

able to provide the natural gas transportation service requested by the customers that have

executed binding agreements for the Project’s capacity, as described in RR 1. The No-Action


3

alternative would further preclude other beneficial impacts of implementing the Project from

occurring, including increased employment, income, and tax revenues.

The No-Action alternative would not meet the purpose and need of the Project. Existing

Transco and other natural gas facilities in or near the Project area do not provide adequate

pipeline capacity for transportation of natural gas to meet customer demand. On a broader

scale, implementing the No-Action alternative would not support the goal of increasing access to

stable and reliable natural gas supplies in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States.

If the necessary quantities of natural gas are not available, consumers may seek other

sources of fossil fuel, which, in general, are environmentally less desirable. Alternatively, in

response to this demand other companies may construct natural gas pipeline projects to

transport the large quantities of gas production from northern Pennsylvania, and these projects

would result in their own environmental impacts. Such actions would likely result in the

transference of environmental impacts from one location to another, but would not eliminate or

reduce all environmental impacts. To date, no other project has been proposed or is known to

be in development to meet the purpose and need of the Project.

4 ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO MEET THE PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

The demand for natural gas to meet projected energy needs continues to increase in the

Project area. Although it is speculative, it is possible that energy users that lack access to

additional affordable and reliable supplies of natural gas may seek other options including

increased conservation or the use of other energy sources. However, when considering the use

of alternate energy sources, the ability of Transco’s customers to incorporate other fuels into

their existing processes or the additional expense of refitting or retrofitting for these alternative

sources must be considered. (Transco will address potential energy alternatives, such as wind

power, solar power, geothermal power, coal, oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, fuel cells, and other

energy sources, in draft RR 10, which is anticipated to be submitted in the 3rd or 4th quarter of

2014.)

5 SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES

System alternatives differ from alternative pipeline routes (major/minor route alternatives

or route variations) because they make use of existing or modified pipeline systems to meet the

objectives of the Project. The purpose of identifying and evaluating system alternatives is to

determine if the impact associated with construction and operation of the proposed facilities

could be avoided or reduced while still allowing the stated objective of the Project to be met. A


4

project system alternative could make it unnecessary to construct all or most of the Project,

although modifications or additions to another existing pipeline system may be required to

increase its capacity sufficiently to transport the Project volumes. These modifications or

additions could result in environmental impacts, which could be less than or greater than those

associated with construction of the Project. For this Project, potential system alternatives

include: 1) the use of existing pipeline systems, with or without system upgrades; 2) different

configuration of Transco’s proposed facilities (such as more compression and less pipeline or

less compression and more pipeline); and 3) any other planned pipeline systems that meet the

Project objectives.

Transco’s customers have subscribed to transport 1.7 MMDth/d of natural gas through

the Project. Transco is currently evaluating system alternatives using other existing or planned

pipeline systems in Pennsylvania that could potentially transport Transco’s proposed volumes of

gas for its customers. (Transco will provide an evaluation of system alternatives in draft RR 10

that is anticipated to be submitted in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

6 ROUTE ALTERNATIVES

Transco is evaluating pipeline routing and compressor station site options based on

routing optimization factors including regional topography, environmental impacts, population

density, existing land use, and construction safety and feasibility considerations. The primary

objective of Transco’s alternatives analysis is to develop a constructible Project that will

accomplish the Project purpose while avoiding or minimizing potential adverse environmental

impact to the greatest extent practicable and to comply with existing regulatory requirements

including the Commission’s guidelines, as set forth in 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

§380.15.

Transco’s pipeline route process included the following three types of route alternatives

for the Project:

• Major route alternative - a route that differs substantially in both length and

distance from the primary route;

• Minor route alternative – a route that deviates on short segments from the

primary route; and

• Route deviation - minor adjustments to the primary route, typically to avoid

specific features (e.g., topography, sensitive habitat, and structures).


5

6.1 ROUTE START AND ENDPOINTS To begin the process of locating a route for the planned pipeline facilities, Transco

identified the start and endpoints of the proposed new pipeline facilities necessary to meet the

stated purpose and need of the Project while maximizing the use of existing Transco

infrastructure for efficiency and reliability and minimizing the amount of incremental facilities

required. Under these parameters, Transco is designing the Project to have the capacity to

receive up to 850,000 dekatherms per day (Dth/d) of natural gas at the existing Williams’ Zick

Compressor Station in Susquehanna County and 850,000 Dth/d of natural gas from various

receipt points on Transco’s existing Leidy Line system, which together constitute the 1.7

MMDth/d for which Transco’s customers have subscribed. As such, Williams’ Zick Compressor

Station was identified as the northern start point of the proposed pipeline route.

Transco determined that the optimal aggregation location for gas flows is at a point on

the Leidy Line system east of, and in proximity to, the existing Transco Compressor Station 517

in Columbia County, Pennsylvania. This location is the most efficient point for two reasons: 1)

gas flows will be aggregated at a point where there are three existing Leidy Line system

pipelines, which reduces the amount of looping required along the Leidy Line system for the

Project volumes; and 2) the location leverages and provides pressure flexibility from the new

horsepower (hp) at Compressor Station 517 to provide higher pressure gas into the proposed

pipeline. Furthermore, if the aggregation point is located west of Compressor Station 517,

additional hp would likely be required at proposed Compressor Station 610 and proposed

Compressor Station 605. Consequently, Transco determined that the northern segment of the

pipeline route must extend between the receipt point at Williams’ Zick Compressor Station and

at the endpoint along the Transco Leidy Line system in proximity to and east of existing

Compressor Station 517.

The southern Project endpoint must be located along the existing Transco existing

Mainline system in order to provide year-round firm transportation service to customers along

the mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States to as far south as the Transco Pooling Point at

Station 85 in Choctaw County, Alabama. In order to minimize the amount of additional facilities

needed to meet the Project objectives, Transco determined that the optimal endpoint of the

pipeline route is a tie-in to the Transco Mainline system as close as practical to existing

Compressor Station 195 as it is the optimal point to deliver the Project volumes into the Transco

Mainline system. At this endpoint, Transco is able to maximize the utilization of its existing

Mainline system facilities, which avoids the need for looping and additional horsepower along


6

the Mainline system. The proposed endpoint is located approximately 8 miles north of existing

Compressor Station 195 in York County, Pennsylvania.

6.2 ROUTE SELECTION Transco considered the following factors in the selection of the pipeline route

alternatives between the Project northern and southern endpoints identified above: regional

topography, potential adverse environmental impacts, population density, existing land use, and

construction safety and feasibility considerations. When identifying routing options, Transco

attempted to co-locate with existing utility corridors and rights-of-way to the maximum extent

possible. The use of co-location as a principle design element is consistent with Commission’s

guidelines, which stress the corridor concept, and complements the existing land use

characteristics in the Project area. Siting pipeline facilities along the existing corridors and right-

of-way (ROW) reduces the establishment of new corridors in previously undisturbed areas,

while limiting the number of affected landowners. Transco defines co-location as siting a

pipeline ROW that:

• Lies within an existing ROW or easement;

• Abuts an existing ROW or easement; or

• Parallels an existing ROW or easement within 300 feet.

Transco used various data sources to identify and evaluate pipeline route alternatives,

including observations during field reconnaissance; Google Earth™; geographic information

system (GIS) databases from county, state, and federal sources; recently flown aerial

photography; United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps; and National

Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps.

After its initial evaluation, Transco narrowed its analysis to its preferred major route

alternative, a 600-foot-wide corridor that optimizes the routing factors listed above. Transco has

divided the preferred alternative into two segments: CPL North and CPL South (see Figure

6.2-1). As discussed above, the aggregation of the two CPL pipelines will be a point on the

Leidy Line system east of, and in proximity to, the existing Transco Compressor Station 517 in

Columbia County, Pennsylvania. For this summary of alternatives, Transco refers to the CPL

North and CPL South as its primary routes.

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

!(

DAUPHIN CO

SUSSEX CO

WAYNE CO

ULSTER CO

CAMDEN CO

CECIL CO

NEWCASTLE CO

BALTIMORE CO

CARROLLCO

BRADFORD CO

COLUMBIA CO

BURLINGTON CO

BERKS CO

SCHUYLKILL CO

NORTHUMBERLAND CO

LACKAWANNA CO

WYOMING CO

CHESTER CO

MONROE CO

YORK CO

CARBON CO

SOMERSET CO

SULLIVAN CO

HARFORD CO

TIOGA CO

GLOUCESTER CO

BROOME CO

CUMBERLAND CO

MONTGOMERY CO

MORRIS CO

MONTOUR CO

DELAWARE CO

LEHIGH CO

CHEMUNG CO

NORTHAMPTON CO

WARREN CO

LUZERNE CO

BUCKS CO

LYCOMING CO

LEBANON CO

SALEM CO

HUNTERDON CO

PIKE CO

SUSQUEHANNA CO

LANCASTER CO

ORANGE CO

ATLANTIC CO

MERCER CO

SUSQU EHANNA R

DELAWARE R

CHEMUNGR

DELAW ARER, E BR

SUSQUEHANNA

R, W BR

SCHUYLKILLR

LEHIGH R

200

195

505

515

205

517

ZickCompressor

Station

River RoadRegulator

Station

Philadelphia

DRAWINGNUMBER: F-FQ-CPLNS-MAJOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVE3:54 PM4/29/2014

Z:\6_Users\cnc\PreFile\Major Route ALternative.mxd

BENOTEDW.O. NO. CHK. APP.DATE BY

DRAWING NO. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLCMAJOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVESATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT

PENNSYLVANIA & NEW JERSEY

REFERENCE TITLE


ISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILINGA CNC4/28/2014NO.

1161503 BEDRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

APPROVED BY:

WO:

DATE:

DATE:

DATE:


ISSUE FOR BID: SCALE:



WV MD

VT

CT

DENJ

PA

NYMA

VA

Alternatives:CPL North - Primary RouteCPL South - Primary RouteDiamond CPL N AlternativeTransco Looping CPL S AlternativeWestern CPL S AlternativeWilliams Midstream CPL North Alternative

Area of Detail

1161503

LegendAPPALACHIAN TRAIL

STATE PARK

STATE FOREST

GAMELANDS

STATE BOUNDARY

COUNTY BOUNDARY

EXISTING TRANSCO SYSTEM

") EXISTING ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES4/29/20144/29/2014CNC

CANADA

ATLANTIC OCEAN

PENNSYLVANIAMARYLAND DELAWARE

NEW JERSEY

PENNSYLVANIA

0 10 205Miles

BE

BE

4/29/2014

Figure 6.2-1

ISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILINGB CNC4/29/2014 1161503 BE BE


8

6.2.1 CPL North The CPL North route commences near milepost (MP) L113.8 of Transco’s existing Leidy

Line A pipeline in Columbia County, Pennsylvania. All MPs starting with “L” refer to locations

along Transco’s existing Leidy Line system. The pipeline route extends northeasterly

approximately 56 miles and terminates at Williams’ Zick Compressor Station in Susquehanna

County, Pennsylvania. Approximately 21 miles of the route is co-located with Transco’s Leidy

Line system, approximately 5 miles is co-located with the Williams Partners Springville Pipeline

(24-inch diameter midstream pipeline), and the remaining 30 miles is greenfield. The CPL North

route is being engineered to maximize co-location with the Transco Leidy Line and Williams

midstream systems; avoid populated areas and residences to the maximum extent practicable;

minimize environmental impacts; and meet construction reliability and feasibility requirements.

6.2.2 CPL South The CPL South route commences near MP 1682.7 of Transco’s existing Mainline

system in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The pipeline route extends north for approximately

121 miles and terminates near MP L113.8 of the existing Transco existing Leidy Line pipeline in

Columbia County, Pennsylvania. Approximately 22 miles of the route is co-located with other

utility rights-of-way, and the remaining approximately 99 miles is greenfield. The CPL South

route is being engineered to avoid populated areas and residences to the maximum extent

practicable; minimize environmental impacts; and meet construction feasibility requirements.

6.3 MAJOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVES Transco considered four other major route alternatives before selecting its preferred

alternative: the Diamond CPL North Alternative, Williams Midstream CPL North Alternative,

Transco Looping CPL South Alternative, and Western CPL South Alternative as depicted in

Figure 6.2-1. Each of major route alternatives is described below.

6.3.1 Diamond CPL North Alternative The Diamond CPL North Alternative starts at the existing Williams Zick Compressor

Station in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. The route continues south for approximately 80

miles and terminates near approximate MP 90.0 of the CPL South in Columbia County,

Pennsylvania. Approximately 42 miles of the route is co-located with other rights-of-way, with

the remaining approximately 38 miles primarily greenfield. The Diamond CPL North Alternative

is about 24 miles longer than CPL North; it moves the terminus of the CPL North route and the


9

aggregation location with flows from CPL South near CPL South approximate MP 90.0, rather

than near MP L113.8 on the Leidy Line system.

Transco did not select this route due to the following constraints:

• It would increase the combined mileage of CPL North by 24 miles;

• It would likely require a second new compressor station for additional

compression along the CPL North pipeline; and

• The route crosses in proximity to Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, and Nanticoke,

Pennsylvania, resulting in significant impacts to residential and other developed

areas.

6.3.2 Williams Midstream CPL North Alternative The Williams Midstream CPL North Alternative starts at the existing Zick Compressor

Station in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. The route continues west along Williams’

Midstream Appalachian Basin Area, co-locating with 10-inch and 12-inch diameter pipelines for

approximately 11 miles, then continues south. It runs adjacent to the existing Williams Partners

Springville 24-inch diameter midstream pipeline for approximately 36 miles, beyond which it

runs another 22 miles as greenfield before terminating at its connection point, near approximate

MP 21.0 on the CPL North route in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The Williams Midstream

CPL North Alternative is approximately 13 miles longer than CPL North. Transco did not select

this route due to the following constraints:

• The smaller diameter midstream pipeline routes exhibit several tight turns that

would be impractical for the route of the 30-inch diameter CPL North pipeline,

making 100 percent co-location through certain areas of the alternative

infeasible.

• The alternative crosses through denser population centers, particularly on the

south end where the alternative route is not co-located with the Springville

Pipeline. This would result in significant impacts to residential and other

developed areas.

6.3.3 Transco Looping CPL South Alternative The Transco Looping CPL South Alternative would utilize Transco’s existing Leidy Line

system and Mainline system rights-of-way by installing non-contiguous pipeline looping along

these systems. The alternative starts near MP L113.8 in Columbia County, Pennsylvania, just

east of the existing Transco Compressor Station 517. From this point, the alternative route


10

traverses east along the Leidy Line system to existing Compressor Station 515 in Luzerne

County, Pennsylvania, continuing southeast along the Leidy Line system to existing

Compressor Station 505 in Somerset County, New Jersey. The route continues south to existing

Compressor Station 205 in Mercer County, New Jersey continuing southwest to the southern

terminus of CPL South in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The current primary route for CPL

North would be the same for the Transco Looping CPL South Alternative.

Transco did not select this route due to the following constraints:

• The alternative requires at least 60 miles of additional CPL South pipeline

construction along the Transco Mainline and Leidy Line system. The longer

distance of this route would require more land than the CPL South route for

construction and operation and would significantly increase impacts on land

uses, especially on forest lands, agricultural lands, wetlands, and waterbodies.

• The alternative requires at least 50,000 incremental hp of additional compression

at three additional existing Transco compressor stations.

• The route is in proximity to several populated areas, resulting in greater impacts

to residential and other developed areas.

• Due to encroachment of residential and commercial structures along the Transco

Mainline and Leidy Line systems, certain areas would be challenging for looping

or 100 percent co-location and may require other greenfield portions to be

constructed, further increasing the overall pipeline mileage of the Project.

The increased mileage and environmental impacts of this alternative exceed the

economic threshold for constructing and meeting the purpose and need of the Project.

Consequently, the Transco Looping CPL South Alternative was eliminated from further

consideration.

6.3.4 Western CPL South Alternative The Western CPL South Alternative starts in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, near

approximate MP L123.0 of the Leidy Line system. The route continues south for approximately

133 miles and terminates at the existing Transco Compressor Station 195 in York County,

Pennsylvania. Approximately 41.3 miles of the route is co-located with other utility rights-of-way,

with the remaining approximately 92 miles primarily greenfield. The Western CPL South

Alternative is approximately 12 miles longer than CPL South. The preferred alternative route for


11

CPL North would not change for the Western CPL South Alternative. Transco did not select this

route due to the following constraints:

• The longer distance of this route would require more land than the CPL South

route for construction and operation and may significantly increase impacts on

land uses, especially on forest lands, agricultural lands, wetlands, and

waterbodies.

• Transco was unable to identify a suitable location to install the pipeline across

the Susquehanna River that would be necessary to interconnect with the

southern endpoint on the Transco Mainline system.

• The route is in proximity to Harrisburg and Hershey, Pennsylvania, resulting in

significant impacts to residential and other developed areas.

• The route is also in proximity to the Three-Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.

6.4 MINOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVES At this time, Transco is considering five minor route alternatives, two on CPL North and

three on CPL South (see Figure 6.4-1). Transco will develop and evaluate additional route

alternatives, as necessary, to address site-specific conditions encountered during the field siting

process, and to address concerns raised during the public scoping and agency review

processes. (Draft Resource Report 10, which Transco anticipates submitting in the 3rd or 4th

quarter of 2014, will present a quantitative comparison of the CPL North and CPL South routes

and minor route alternatives both in narrative and in tables similar to the example provided

below.)

Table Example Route Alternatives Comparison

Factor CPL North Route CPL North Alt 1 Difference between Alternative Route

and Primary Route

Length of Corresponding Segment (miles)

Co-location

Length Adjacent to Interstate Pipeline ROW (miles)

Length Adjacent to Midstream Pipeline ROW (miles)

Length Adjacent to Electric Transmission Line ROW (miles)

Length Adjacent to Roadway (miles)


12



and Primary Route

Total Length Co-located (miles)

ROW Requirements

Pipeline Construction Requirements (acres)a

Pipeline Operation Requirements (acres)b

Federal and State Land

Federal Lands Crossed (number/miles)

State Lands Crossed (number/miles)

Land Use

Forested Land Crossed (miles)c

Forested Land Impacts (construction/operation) (acres)c

Forest Interior Crossed (miles)d

Forest Interior Impacts (construction/operation) (acres)d

Agricultural Land Crossed (miles)e

Agricultural Land Impacted (construction/operation) (acres)e

Residences within 50 feet of the construction workspacef

Landfills, quarries, and other mining operations within 0.25 mile (number)

Waterbodies

Waterbodies Crossed (number)g

Major Waterbody Crossings (number >100 feet)h

Wetlands

Total Wetland Complexes Crossed (number)i

Total Wetland Crossed (miles)i

Palustrine Forested Wetland Complex Impacts (construction/operation) (acres)i

Cultural Resources

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Eligible or Potentially Eligible Cultural Resources Sites Crossed (number)j

Other Physical Features

Road Crossings (number)

Railroad Crossings (number)


13



and Primary Route

Other Environmental Features

Steep Slopes Crossed (30 degrees or greater) (miles)k

Side Slope Construction (miles)l

Notes: a Pipeline construction requirements based on a 100-foot-wide construction corridor. b Pipeline operation requirements based on a 50-foot-wide corridor in greenfield segments, and a 25-foot-wide

corridor in co-located segments. c Forested land crossed and impacted based on United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Cover

Dataset (NLCD). d Forest interior determined by assessment of forest cover from NLCD, where forest interior was considered 300

feet from forest breaks and outer forest edge. e Agricultural land crossed and impacted based on USGS NLCD. f Residences identified based on review of aerial photography; in cases where it was not clear if a structure was a

residence or other structure (e.g., barn and storage facility), the structure was assumed to be a residence. g Waterbodies identified based on National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). h Major waterbodies identified based on review of aerial photography. i Wetlands identified using the National Wetland Inventory (NWI). j National Registered sites were identified using desktop data. k Length determined perpendicular to slope contour. l Length determined parallel with slope contour. Developed using USGS 10-foot contours.

Following is a brief overview of each minor route alternative Transco is considering at

this time for CPL North and CPL South.

6.4.1 CPL North Alternative 1 CPL North Alternative 1 is under consideration as a possible crossing of the

Susquehanna River. The alternative route diverges from the primary route near MP 33.6 in

Wyoming County, extends 6.1 miles to the northeast, and intersects the primary route near MP

38.4 in Wyoming County. This segment is 1.3 miles longer than the corresponding segment of

the primary route. Transco is reviewing CPL North Alternative 1 to determine if a crossing,

including the possibility of a horizontal directional drill (HDD), of the Susquehanna River is

feasible at this location.

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

")

!(

DAUPHIN CO

SUSSEX CO

WAYNE CO

ULSTER CO

CAMDEN CO

CECIL CO

NEWCASTLE CO

BALTIMORE CO

CARROLLCO

BRADFORD CO

COLUMBIA CO

BURLINGTON CO

BERKS CO

SCHUYLKILL CO

NORTHUMBERLAND CO

LACKAWANNA CO

WYOMING CO

CHESTER CO

MONROE CO

YORK CO

CARBON CO

SOMERSET CO

SULLIVAN CO

HARFORD CO

TIOGA CO

GLOUCESTER CO

BROOME CO

CUMBERLAND CO

MONTGOMERY CO

MORRIS CO

MONTOUR CO

DELAWARE CO

LEHIGH CO

CHEMUNG CO

NORTHAMPTON CO

WARREN CO

LUZERNE CO

BUCKS CO

LYCOMING CO

LEBANON CO

SALEM CO

HUNTERDON CO

PIKE CO

SUSQUEHANNA CO

LANCASTER CO

ORANGE CO

ATLANTIC CO

MERCER CO

SUSQU EHANNA R

DELAWARE R

CHEMUNGR

DELAW ARER, E BR

SUSQUEHANNA

R, W BR

SCHUYLKILLR

LEHIGH R

200

195

505

515

205

517

ZickCompressor

Station

River RoadRegulator

Station

Philadelphia

DRAWINGNUMBER: F-FQ-CPLNS-MINOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVE3:54 PM4/29/2014

Z:\6_Users\cnc\PreFile\Minor Route ALternative.mxd


DRAWING NO. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLCMINOR ROUTE ALTERNATIVESATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT

PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE


ISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILINGA IAM4/28/2014NO.

1161503 BEDRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

APPROVED BY:

WO:

DATE:

DATE:

DATE:





WV MD

VT

CT

DENJ

PA

NYMA

VA

Alternatives:CPL North - Primary RouteCPL South - Primary RouteCPL N Alternative 1CPL N Alternative 2CPL S Alternative 1CPL S Alternative 2CPL S Alternative 3

Area of Detail

1161503

4/29/20144/29/2014IAM

CANADA

ATLANTIC OCEAN

PENNSYLVANIAMARYLAND DELAWARE

NEW JERSEY

PENNSYLVANIA

0 10 205Miles

LegendAPPALACHIAN TRAIL

STATE PARK

STATE FOREST

GAMELANDS

STATE BOUNDARY

COUNTY BOUNDARY

") EXISTING ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES

EXISTING TRANSCO SYSTEM

BE

BE 4/29/2014

Figure 6.4-1

ISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILINGB IAM4/29/2014 1161503 BE BE


15

6.4.2 CPL North Alternative 2 CPL North Alternative 2 is under consideration but was not included in the primary route

due to the presence of an underground railroad tunnel. The alternative route diverges from the

primary route near MP 43.6 in Wyoming County, extends 5.3 miles to the northeast, and

intersects the primary route near MP 49.3 in north Wyoming County. This segment is 0.4 mile

shorter than the corresponding segment of the primary route. Transco is reviewing CPL North

Alternative 2 to determine if a crossing near the underground railroad tunnel is safe and

constructible.

6.4.3 CPL South Alternative 1 CPL South Alternative 1 is under consideration as a possible crossing of the

Appalachian Trail. The alternative route diverges from the primary route near MP 51.8 in

Lebanon County, extends 15.1 miles to the northeast, and intersects the primary route near MP

68.2 in Schuylkill County. This segment is 1.25 miles longer than the corresponding segment of

the primary route. Transco is reviewing CPL South Alternative 1 to determine if this crossing of

the Appalachian Trail is constructible. Transco is also reviewing the viewshed and

environmental considerations for this alternative. Transco will consult with the National Park

Service (NPS) and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy for primary and alternative crossings of

the Appalachian Trail. (Transco will provide correspondence with the NPS and the Appalachian

Trail Conservancy to the Commission upon receipt.)

6.4.4 CPL South Alternative 2 CPL South Alternative 2 is under consideration to maximize co-location with an existing

electric transmission line. The alternative route diverges from the primary route near MP 73.9 in

Schuylkill County, extends about 17 miles to the north, and rejoins the primary route near MP

91.1 in Columbia County. This segment is approximately 1 mile longer than the corresponding

segment of the primary route. Transco is reviewing CPL South Alternative 2 to determine if

co-location with the electric transmission line is feasible.

6.4.5 CPL South Alternative 3 CPL South Alternative 3 is under consideration to maximize co-location with an existing

interstate pipeline and electric transmission line. The alternative route diverges from the primary

route near MP 103.5 in Columbia County, extends 19.4 miles to the north, and ends at the

terminus of the primary route. This segment is about 1.5 miles longer than the corresponding


16

segment of the primary route. Transco is reviewing CPL South Alternative 3 to determine if

co-location with the existing interstate pipeline and electric transmission line is feasible.

6.5 ROUTE DEVIATIONS Transco is currently evaluating localized route deviations for CPL South and CPL North

based on landowner and stakeholder comments and review of engineering and environmental

field survey data. (Draft RR 10, which Transco anticipates submitting in the 3rd or 4th quarter of

2014, will include a summary of quantitative comparisons of route deviations identified during

the scoping period.)

The Tucquan Glenn route deviation is under development and consideration by Transco

and is located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania (see Figure 6.5-1). Transco has received

public comments expressing concerns regarding the proposed pipeline crossing of the Tucquan

Glenn Nature Preserve near approximate MP 5.0. This preserve is owned by the Lancaster

County Conservancy and covers 336 acres within the Tucquan Creek watershed. A publically

accessible hiking trail runs through the preserve. Transco will consult with the Lancaster County

Conservancy on the Tucquan Glenn route deviation and any other proposed crossings of lands

managed by the Lancaster County Conservancy. (Transco will provide correspondence with

Lancaster County Conservancy to the Commission upon receipt.)

The Tucquan Glenn route deviation would avoid crossing the preserve. It diverges from

the CPL South route near MP 4.4 in Lancaster County, extend about 2.7 miles to the northwest,

and intersects the primary route near MP 6.7 in Lancaster County. This route deviation is

approximately 2.4 miles longer than the corresponding segment of the primary route. (A

complete analysis of environmental impacts for the Tucquan Glenn route deviation, as well as

evaluation of additional route deviations, will be provided in draft RR 10 which Transco

anticipates submitting in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)

6.6 ADDITIONAL REFINEMENT OF CPL NORTH AND CPL SOUTH ROUTES At this time, Transco has identified a 600-foot-wide study corridor along the greenfield

portions of the CPL North and CPL South routes. Through its stakeholder outreach process,

Transco is seeking specific input on the primary routes principally within the study corridor. In

addition, Transco is undertaking rigorous field surveys and research to identify a constructible

pipeline centerline within this 600-foot-wide corridor that would have the least impact on the

environment and landowners while maintaining constructability and safety. Transco is seeking,

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

t

F-FQ-CPLS-Tucquan Glen Deviation12:41 PM4/28/2014

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\PreFile\TucquanDeviation.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNC

BECHECKED BY:

WO:

APPROVED BY: DATE:



DRAWING NO.

DATE:

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.TUCQUAN GLEN ROUTE DEVIATION

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT42" CENTRAL PENN LINE SOUTH PRIMARY ROUTE


REFERENCE TITLE



4/28/2014

4/28/2014A CNC4/28/2014


0 1,000 2,000 3,000UNITS IN FEET SHEET 1 OF 1

LegendCPL SOUTH PRIMARY ROUTETUCQUAN GLEN ROUTE DEVIATIONEXISTING ELECTRICAL LINESTUCQUAN GLEN PRESERVE 1161503

1161503

Map

YorkCounty

LancasterCounty

BE

BE 4/28/2014

Figure 6.5-1


18

and will continue to seek, input from landowners, agencies, and other stakeholders throughout

the FERC Pre-Filing Process to develop the preferred CPL North and CPL South alternatives.

The preferred alternatives developed during pre-filing will be Transco’s proposed routes when

Transco files its application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity with the

Commission in March 2015.

7 PIPELINE LOOPS AND PIPELINE REPLACEMENT

As part of this Project, Transco is also proposing two pipeline loops and pipeline

replacements: Grugan Loop, Unity Loop, and Mainlines A and B Replacements.

7.1 PRIMARY ROUTE IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION Transco identified the start and endpoints of the proposed new looping facilities to meet

its stated purpose and need of the Project while maximizing existing Transco infrastructure for

efficiency and reliability and minimizing the amount of incremental facilities required. As

previously discussed, Transco is designing its Project to have the capacity to receive up to

850,000 Dth/d of natural gas at the existing Williams Zick Compressor Station in Susquehanna

County and up to 850,000 Dth/d of natural gas from various receipt points on Transco’s existing

Leidy Line system, which together constitute the 1.7 MMDth/d for which Transco’s customers

have subscribed.

Transco determined that the optimal location for these gas flows to be aggregated will be

at a point on the Leidy Line system east of and in proximity to the existing Transco Compressor

Station 517 in Columbia County, Pennsylvania. This location is the most efficient location to

take gas flows from the Leidy Line system because the Project will be able to receive gas flows

from three existing Leidy Line pipelines at this location, which reduces the amount of looping

pipelines required along the Leidy Line system for the increased gas supplies. Consequently,

Transco determined the first segment of the pipeline route must start at Williams’ Zick

Compressor Station and extend to a location along the Transco Leidy Line system in proximity

to Compressor Station 517.

The primary Grugan and Unity Loops routes, as discussed below, are required to

facilitate the transportation of incremental volumes from receipt points along the Leidy Line

system to the CPL South interconnect near MP L113.8.

7.1.1 Grugan Loop The primary route of the Grugan Loop consists of approximately 5.5 miles of 36-inch

pipeline parallel to the existing Leidy Line system in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. This loop


19

extends from MPs L171.8 to L177.3 on the existing Transco Leidy Line system. The Leidy Line

system between these MPs currently has four pipelines within the existing permanent

easement. Once constructed and in operation, Transco will refer to the Grugan Loop as the

Leidy Line E pipeline.

7.1.2 Unity Loop The primary route of the Unity Loop consists of approximately 9 miles of 42-inch pipeline

parallel to the existing Leidy Line system in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. This pipeline loops

the Leidy Line system from MPs L119.9 to L128.9. The existing Leidy Line system between

these MPs currently has three pipelines within the existing permanent easement. Once

constructed, Transco would refer to the Unity Loop as the Leidy Line D pipeline.

7.1.3 Mainline A and B Replacements The Mainline A and B replacement segments consist of replacing a total of

approximately 2.5 miles of Transco’s existing 30-inch Mainline “A” pipeline and 30-inch Mainline

“B” pipeline between MPs 1578.7 and 1583.0 in Prince William County, Virginia.

7.2 MAJOR, MINOR AND ROUTE DEVIATION ALTERNATIVES: PIPELINE LOOPS AND PIPELINE REPLACEMENT The primary routes of the loops and replacements are fully co-located with existing

Transco pipeline rights-of way. As previously discussed, co-location has several inherent

engineering, long-term operations, maintenance, and environmental advantages. Typically,

alternatives deviations from the corridor result in additional construction impacts, additional

installation costs, and additional operating costs (two separate rights-of-way to maintain instead

of one). Pipeline loops are usually shorter and more efficient hydraulically than deviations

because of their placement adjacent to the existing pipeline.

At this time, Transco is considering one major route alternative to the Grugan Loop.

Transco will develop and evaluate additional route alternatives for the Grugan and Unity Loops

as necessary to address concerns raised during the public scoping, agency review processes,

and field surveys. Because the Mainline A and B replacement segments will be located within

areas where Transco currently holds easements and limited construction workspace is required,

Transco does not anticipate any route alternatives for these facilities. (Evaluation of any

additional route alternatives along the loops will be included in draft RR 10, which Transco

anticipates submitting in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014.)


20

Grugan Loop Alternative 1 Grugan Loop Alternative 1 is under consideration to reduce the overall loop length (see

Figure 7.2-1). The alternative looping route originates west of the primary route near MP L188.9

in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, and extends about 3 miles to the east, ending near MP L185.9.

This segment is about 2.5 miles shorter than the corresponding segment of the primary route.

Transco are reviewing Grugan Loop Alternative 1 to assess the impacts and constructability of

this alternative to determine if the loop can be moved and reduced in length.

8 COMPRESSOR STATION ALTERNATIVES

Transco conducted a hydraulic analysis to determine the optimum hp and compression

required for the Project to provide the volumes of natural gas necessary to meet market

demand. As a result, Transco identified the need for two new compressor stations: one on CPL

North (Compressor Station 605) and one on CPL South (Compressor Station 610).

While the availability of land for purchase is an obvious limiting factor in the site selection

process, the following considerations will also influence Transco’s determination of site

suitability for the new compressor stations:

• Engineering Design and Construction: Pipeline companies consider several

engineering design and construction factors when selecting a compressor station

site, including facility and workspace requirements, topography, elevation, road

access, and noise sensitive receptors.

• Hydraulics limitations: hp requirements for Compressor Stations 605 and 610

may increase if station sites move farther downstream of the aggregated receipt

points.

• Land/workspace requirements: Transco undertook a detailed analysis to select a

30-acre or larger property for each site to install the new compressor stations.

• Site elevation: Transco sought out land parcels featuring topography that

minimizes the extent of fill or excavation of soil required during construction of

the new facility, including workspace needs.

• Road access: Transco sought to maximize proximity of the new compressor

stations to the nearest public road, thereby minimizing the need for new access

roads, as well as minimizing the need for modifications or improvements to

existing roads.

X.

X.

X.

X.

CLINTON CO

POTTER CO

LYCOMING CO

CENTRECO

Bald Eagle Township

Grugan Township

Chapman Township

Stewardson Township

Chap

man T

owns

hip

Brow

n Tow

nship

Chapman Township

Noyes Township

Chap

man To

wnsh

ipGr

ugan

Town

ship

Chap

manT

owns

hip

Leidy

Town

ship

Gallagher Township

Grugan Township

McHenry Township

Brown Township

McHenry Township

Grugan Township

Wood

ward

Town

ship

Coleb

rook

Town

ship

Stew

ards

on To

wnsh

ip

Brow

n Tow

nship

Beech Creek Township

Noyes Township

Noyes Township

Grugan Township

185.90

188.90

171.84

177.29

DRAWINGNUMBER: F-FQ-LL-171.8-E-Grugan Route Alternative5:15 PM4/28/2014

Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\PreFile\Grugan_Alternative1_042814.mxd


DRAWING NO. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLCGRUGAN LOOP ALTERNATIVE 1ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECT

PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE


ISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILINGA CNC4/28/2014NO.

1161125 BEDRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

APPROVED BY:

WO:

DATE:

DATE:

DATE:





WV MD

PA

NY

Area of Detail

1161125

LegendGRUGAN LOOP PRIMARY ROUTEGRUGAN LOOP ALTERNATIVE 1STATE FORESTEXISTING TRANSCO SYSTEMTOWNSHIP LINE

4/28/20144/28/2014CNC

0 1 20.5Miles

PENNSYLVANIA

BE

BE

4/28/2014

t

Figure 7.2-1


22

• Interconnecting pipe: To minimize the impact on the surrounding community,

Transco favors siting the new compressor stations on properties closest to the

proposed rights-of-way so that they would not require pipeline extensions for the

suction and discharge piping. This approach also minimizes the land

requirements for the Project, thereby minimizing the number of affected property

owners.

Transco has identified three locations that meet the requirements for Compressor

Station 605 and three locations that meet the requirements for Compressor Station 610 (see

Figures 8-1 and 8-2). Transco is currently evaluating environmental impact parameters for the

alternative compressor station sites based on desktop resources, such as 7.5-minute USGS

topographic maps, aerial photography, and available literature on environmental resources.

Several environmental characteristics are being evaluated using these resources. (Draft RR 10,

anticipated to be submitted in the 3rd or 4th quarter of 2014, will include a quantitative

comparison of the compressor station site alternatives both in narrative form and in tables

similar to the example provided below.)

Table Example Comparison of Compressor Station Option Sites

Factor CS 605 Option Sites

CS 605-A CS 605-B CS 605-C

Parcel area (acres) Steep slopes (30 degrees or greater) (acres) Forested area (acres) Agricultural area (acres) Waterbodies (number) NWI Wetlands (acres) Shallow Depth to Bedrock (acres) Occupied Structures within 50 feet of Property

The following is a brief overview of each compressor station site alternative Transco is

considering at this time for Compressor Station 605 and Compressor Station 610:

• Compressor Station 605, Option A (CS 605 – A) — A 30-acre or larger parcel

located in Lenox Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. The site

consists entirely of agricultural land.


23

• Compressor Station 605, Option B (CS 605 – B) — A 30-acre or larger parcel

located in Lenox Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. The site is a

mixture of agricultural and forest land.

• Compressor Station 605, Option C (CS 605 – C) — A 30-acre or larger parcel

located in Clinton Township, Wyoming County, Pennsylvania. The site consists

entirely of agricultural land.

• Compressor Station 610, Option A (CS 610 – A) — A 30-acre or larger parcel

located in Hemlock Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. The site consists


• Compressor Station 610, Option B (CS 610 – B) — A 30-acre or larger parcel

located in Hemlock Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. The site consists


• Compressor Station 610, Option C (CS 610 – C) — A 30-acre or larger parcel

located in Mt. Pleasant Township, Columbia County, Pennsylvania. The site

consists entirely of agricultural land.

Gas Turbine Design Alternative Transco is proposing electric motor drives for Compressor Station 605, Compressor

Station 610, and Compressor Station 190. However, if Transco cannot obtain access to reliable

electricity, or if routing power to the compressor stations causes more substantial cumulative

impacts to the environment, Transco will evaluate the use of gas turbines.

Further evaluation will consider the following gas turbine components at the proposed

new compressor stations:

• Compressor Station 605 – Two Solar Mars 100S 15,000 hp each; and

• Compressor Station 610– One Solar Titan 250S 30,000 hp and one Solar Titan

130S 20,500 hp.

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

")

")

CompressorStation 605

Option A


Option B


Option C 44.0044.50

45.0045.50

46.0046.50

47.0047.50

48.0048.5049.00

49.5050.00

51.0051.5052.00

52.5053.00

53.5054.00

54.50

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:F-FQ-CPLN-CS 605 LOCATION MAP

12:30 PM 4/28/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\PreFile\CS605_Location_map.mxd

DRAWN BY: IAMBECHECKED BY:

WO:APPROVED BY: DATE:

ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION:ISSUE FOR BID: SCALE: NOTEDW.O. NO. CHK. APP.NO. DATE BY

DRAWING NO.

DATE:

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.OPTIONS FOR COMPRESSOR STATION 605 LOCATION MAP

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTWYOMING & SUSQUEHANNA COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE

REVISION DESCRIPTIONISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILING

4/28/20144/28/2014A BE4/28/2014 1161536

11615364/28/2014

")

")

")

Map

LackawannaCounty

WyomingCounty

SusquehannaCounty



IAM

0 7,000 14,000 21,000UNITS IN FEET

Legend") COMPRESSOR STATION 605 OPTIONS

CPL NORTH PIPELINE PRIMARY ROUTE

t

BEBE

Figure 8-1

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

")

")

105.00

105.50

COMPRESSORSTATION 610OPTION A

COMPRESSORSTATION 610

OPTION B

COMPRESSORSTATION 610OPTION C

99.50100.00

100.50

101.00

101.50102.00

102.50

103.00103.50104.00

104.50

106.00106.50

107.00

107.50

108.00

WeiserForest

DRAWINGNUMBER:

DATE:

F-FQ-CPLS-CS 610 Location Map1:57 PM 4/28/2014Z:\101769\6_Users\cnc\PreFile\CS610_Location_map.mxd



DRAWN BY: CNCBECHECKED BY:

WO:APPROVED BY: DATE:

ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION:ISSUE FOR BID: SCALE: NOTEDW.O. NO. CHK. APP.NO. DATE BY

DRAWING NO.

DATE:

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.OPTIONS FOR COMPRESSOR STATION 610 LOCATION MAP

ATLANTIC SUNRISE PROJECTCOLUMBIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

REFERENCE TITLE

REVISION DESCRIPTIONISSUED FOR FERC PRE-FILING

4/28/20144/28/2014A BE4/28/2014

SHEET 1 OF 1

1161536

11615364/28/2014

")")

")

Map

DauphinCountyDauphin

County

DauphinCounty

SnyderCounty

Perry County

ColumbiaCounty

BerksCounty

SchuylkillCounty

SullivanCounty

NorthumberlandCounty

WyomingCounty

CarbonCounty

Juniata County

MontourCounty

Lehigh County

LuzerneCounty

LycomingCounty

UnionCounty

0 6,000 12,000 18,000UNITS IN FEET

Legend") COMPRESSOR STATION 610 OPTIONS

CPL NORTH PIPELINE PRIMARY ROUTE

STATE FOREST

t

BECNC

Figure 8-2

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Land, Permits & GIS Department 2800 Post Oak Boulevard (77056) P.O. Box 1396 Houston, Texas 77251-1396 713/215-2000

June 11, 2014 Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Reference: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC

Atlantic Sunrise Project Docket No. PF14-8 Monthly Pre-Filing Status Report

Dear Ms. Bose: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco) hereby files this Monthly Status Report for the Atlantic Sunrise Project (Project) for activities conducted from May 9 through June 6, 2014.

Project Scope and Schedule

Transco entered the pre-filing process with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on April 4, 2014. Initial draft Resource Report 1 and the Summary of Alternatives Considered were filed with the Commission on April 30, 2014.

Prior to the filing of the Draft Resource Reports, Transco is tracking routes or workspaces outside of the 600-foot survey corridor as alternatives. Several previously identified alternatives have been removed from further consideration or incorporated into the primary route. Field routing of the centerline within the 600-foot study corridor is ongoing and will be identified as the preferred route in the 4th quarter filing of the Draft Resource Reports.

Since Transco’s submittal of the Summary of Alternatives Considered, an additional alternative has been identified in Lancaster County. This alternative was developed to avoid Tucquan Glenn, Shenks Ferry, and further reduce forested impacts. A figure depicting this alternative is enclosed. Landowners within the 600-foot study corridor have been notified of the route. The alternative will be presented at the Open House to be held in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania on June 11, 2014. The landowners contacted for this alternative will be filed with FERC as Privileged and Confidential under a separate filing.

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 11, 2014 Page 2 Transco is also continuing to research additional compressor station site options for proposed Compressor Station 605 and Compressor Station 610. Currently three options are being reviewed for Compressor Station 605 and five options are being reviewed for Compressor Station 610.

Routing, Environmental, and Cultural Resource Surveys

Centerline routing surveys started on May 12, 2014 along the Central Penn Line (CPL) North and CPL South. Environmental and cultural resource surveys started on May 19, 2014 and will progress along the Primary Routes (within the 600-foot study corridor) identified in the initial draft of Resource Report 1 and along specific alternatives, as survey permission is available. Mist-netting surveys for Indiana and northern long-eared bats started on May 22, 2014. Phase 1 and Phase 2 surveys will begin in late June 2014 for other threatened and endangered species, including bog turtle, timber rattlesnake, Allegheny woodrat, and state-listed plant species. Surveys will be conducted in accordance with agency guidance on survey protocols.

Routing surveys have been completed as follows:

23 miles (66%) for the greenfield portion of CPL North 42 miles (35%) for CPL South 9 miles (100%) for Unity Loop 3 miles (100%) of Chapman Loop 2.5 miles (100%) of Virginia Replacements A&B

Environmental wetland and waterbody surveys have been completed as follows:

14 miles (25%) of CPL North 8 miles (7%) of CPL South 9 miles (100%) for Unity Loop 0 miles (0%) of Chapman Loop 0 miles (0%) of Virginia Replacements A&B

Cultural resource surveys have been completed as follows:

4 miles (44%) for Unity Loop 14.5 miles (26%) of CPL North 6 miles (5%) of CPL South 0 miles (0%) of Chapman Loop 0 miles (0%) of Virginia Replacements A&B

Access roads and staging/pipe yards are currently being identified as landowner permission is granted. Compressor Station 605 and 610 option locations are under consideration and are anticipated to be surveyed in July.

Agency Consultation

Additional agency meetings that occurred this reporting period are listed below.

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 11, 2014 Page 3

May 19, 2014 – Meeting with Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) to discuss process for obtaining survey permission and easements on State Game Lands and other lands managed by PGC.

May 27, 2014 – Meeting with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Baltimore District to introduce the Project.

State and Federal Permits and Clearances

There are no updates or modifications to the list of major state and federal environmental permits and clearances previously filed in initial draft Resource Report 1.

Landowner

Transco continues to make notifications to landowners. Transco is actively working with individual landowners to address their concerns regarding routing on their property as access is granted. A landowner contact list was submitted to the FERC under Privileged and Confidential on May 2, 2014. Landowners along the Lancaster Alternative were notified the week of May 26, 2014. The following table summarizes the status of survey access permission to date.

Project Survey Permission Status

Component Survey

Permission Granted (Tracts)

Survey Permission

Denied (Tracts)

Survey Permission

Pending (Tracts)

No Contact (Tracts)

CPL North & CPL South Primary Routes

81% 11% 6% 3%

Lancaster County Alternative1 4% 1% 95% 0%

Unity Loop 99% 1% 0% 0%

Chapman Loop 54% 11% 32% 3%

Mainline A&B Replacements None Required – within Transco easements 2

1 Includes one reroute in Lancaster County, PA. 2 Will be included in future reports, as applicable, if additional temporary workspace is required.

Public Outreach

Transco’s outreach team continues to meet with state, county, and township officials in the areas potentially affected by the Project. The outreach team will continue its efforts to keep the community leaders in the Project area informed of company activities. Outreach meetings that occurred since the last reporting period are listed below.

Open Houses

Approximately 1,000 people have attended seven open houses thus far:

May 20, 2014 - Luzerne County – Completed. Approximately 200 attendees.

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 11, 2014 Page 4

May 21, 2014 - Lycoming County – Completed. Approximately 75 attendees. May 22, 2014 - Clinton County – Completed. Approximately 50 attendees. June 2, 2014 - Susquehanna County – Completed. Approximately 75 attendees. June 3, 2014 - Wyoming County – Completed. Approximately 200 attendees. June 4, 2014 - Northumberland County – Completed. Approximately 50 attendees. June 5, 2014 - Columbia County – Completed. Approximately 350 attendees. June 9, 2014 - Schuylkill County – Completed but will be reported in the next monthly status

report. June 10, 2014 - Lebanon County – Completed but will be reported in the next monthly status

report. June 11, 2014 - Lancaster County – Upcoming.

o Note: Venue change for the Lancaster Open House to Millersville University - Student Memorial Center, Marauder Hall, 21 S George St, Millersville, PA 17551. Notice has been provided to landowner and stakeholders.

PA State, County, and Township Meetings

May 6, 2014 - Luzerne County May 14, 2014 - Fairmount Township May 15, 2014 - Pennsylvania County Conservation Districts May 20, 2014 - Lancaster County Conservancy, Planning Commission, and Farmland Trust May 21, 2014 - Dallas Township May 29, 2014 - Representatives from the Marcellus Shale Coalition and the Lancaster County

legislative delegation June 2 and 3, 2014 - Various legislators and/or staff in Harrisburg, PA June 4, 2014 – South Londonderry Township

Any questions regarding this submittal should be directed to Anne Allen at (713) 215-2406, or via email at [email protected]. Respectfully, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Roberta Zwier Supervisor, Environmental Permitting, Atlantic-Gulf Operating Area cc: Commission Staff