auckland development committee - september 15 - agenda

8/20/2019 Auckland Development Committee - September 15 - Agenda

1/48

Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as council policyunless and until adopted. Should members require further information relating to any reports, please contactthe relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson.

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Auckland Development Committee will be heldon:

Date:Time:Meeting Room:Venue:

Thursday, 10 September 2015 9.30am Reception LoungeAuckland Town Hall301-305 Queen StreetAuckland

Auckland Development Committee

OPEN AGENDA

MEMBERSHIP

Chairperson Deputy Mayor Penny Hulse Deputy Chairperson Cr Chris Darby Members Cr Anae Arthur Anae Member Liane Ngamane

Cr Cameron Brewer Cr Calum Penrose Mayor Len Brown, JP Cr Dick Quax Cr Dr Cathy Casey Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM Cr Bill Cashmore Member David Taipari Cr Ross Clow Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE Cr Linda Cooper, JP Cr Wayne Walker Cr Alf Filipaina Cr John Watson Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO Cr Penny Webster Cr Denise Krum Cr George Wood, CNZM Cr Mike Lee

(Quorum 11 members)

Tam WhiteDemocracy Advisor

3 September 2015

Contact Telephone: (09) 890 8156Email: [email protected]: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz


2/48


3/48

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Responsibilities

This committee will lead the implementation of the Auckland Plan, including the integration ofeconomic, social, environmental and cultural objectives for Auckland for the next 30 years. It will

guide the physical development and growth of Auckland through a focus on land use planning,housing and the appropriate provision of infrastructure and strategic projects associated with theseactivities. Key responsibilities include:

Unitary Plan

Plan changes to operative plans

Designation of Special Housing Areas

Housing policy and projects including Papakainga housing

Spatial Plans including Area Plans

City centre development (incl reporting of CBD advisory board) and city transformationprojects

Tamaki regeneration projects

Built Heritage

Urban design

Powers

(i) All powers necessary to perform the committee’s responsibilities.

Except:

(a) powers that the Governing Body cannot delegate or has retained to itself (seeGoverning Body responsibilities)

(b) where the committee’s responsibility is explicitly limited to making a recommendationonly.

(ii) Approval of a submission to an external body

(iii) Powers belonging to another committee, where it is necessary to make a decision prior to thenext meeting of that other committee.

(iv) Power to establish subcommittees.


4/48

Exclusion of the public – who needs to leave the meeting

Members of the public

All members of the public must leave the meeting when the public are excluded unless a resolutionis passed permitting a person to remain because their knowledge will assist the meeting.

Those who are not members of the public

General principles

Access to confidential information is managed on a “need to know” basis where access to theinformation is required in order for a person to perform their role.

Those who are not members of the meeting (see list below) must leave unless it is necessaryfor them to remain and hear the debate in order to perform their role.

Those who need to be present for one confidential item can remain only for that item and mustleave the room for any other confidential items.

In any case of doubt, the ruling of the chairperson is final.

Members of the meeting

The members of the meeting remain (all Governing Body members if the meeting is aGoverning Body meeting; all members of the committee if the meeting is a committee meeting).

However, standing orders require that a councillor who has a pecuniary conflict of interest leavethe room.

All councillors have the right to attend any meeting of a committee and councillors who are notmembers of a committee may remain, subject to any limitations in standing orders.

Independent Māori Statutory Board

Members of the Independent Māori Statutory Board who are appointed members of thecommittee remain.

Independent Māori Statutory Board members and staff remain if this is necessary in order forthem to perform their role.

Staff

All staff supporting the meeting (administrative, senior management) remain.

Other staff who need to because of their role may remain.

Local Board members

Local Board members who need to hear the matter being discussed in order to perform theirrole may remain. This will usually be if the matter affects, or is relevant to, a particular LocalBoard area.

Council Controlled Organisations

Representatives of a Council Controlled Organisation can remain only if required to fordiscussion of a matter relevant to the Council Controlled Organisation.


5/48


10 September 2015

Page 5

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

1 Apologies 7

2 Declaration of Interest 7

3 Confirmation of Minutes 7

4 Petitions 7

5 Public Input 7

6 Local Board Input 7

7 Extraordinary Business 8

8 Notices of Motion 8

9 Reports Pending Status Update 9

10 Summary of information memos and briefings - 10 September 2015 17

11 Special Housing Area programme for 2015/16 19

12 Consideration of Extraordinary Items

PUBLIC EXCLUDED

13 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 47

C1 Confidential Reports Pending Status Update 47

C2 Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Submissions - Council position for

Mediation and Hearing - Puhinui Rural Urban Boundary 47

C3 Stormwater Land Acquisition - Hugh's Way, Flat Bush 48

C4 Compulsory acquisition of easements for stormwater purposes 48


6/48


7/48


10 September 2015

Page 7

1 Apologies

Apologies have been received from Mayor LCM Brown, Cr CM Casey, Chairperson PAHulse and Cr GS Wood.

2 Declaration of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision makingwhen a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other externalinterest they might have.

3 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Auckland Development Committee:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday 13 August 2015,including the confidential section, as a true and correct record.

4 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

5 Public Input

Standing Order 7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to theDemocracy Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day prior to the

meeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting Chairperson has the discretionto decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders. Amaximum of thirty (30) minutes is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes speaking time for each speaker.

At the close of the agenda no requests for public input had been received.

6 Local Board Input

Standing Order 6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of thatChairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this time. The

Chairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson) shall wherever practical,give one (1) day’s notice of their wish to speak. The meeting Chairperson has thediscretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of StandingOrders.

This right is in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on theagenda.

At the close of the agenda no requests for local board input had been received.


8/48


10 September 2015

Page 8

7 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (asamended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if -

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to thepublic,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until asubsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (asamended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the localauthority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a timewhen it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting;

but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that itemexcept to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for furtherdiscussion.”

8 Notices of Motion

At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.


9/48

I t e m 9


10 September 2015

Reports Pending Status Update Page 9

Reports Pending Status Update

File No.: CP2015/18300

Purpose

1. To update the committee on the status of Auckland Development Committee resolutionsfrom February 2015, requiring follow-up reports.

Executive Summary2. This report is a regular information-only report that provides committee members with

greater visibility of committee resolutions requiring follow-up reports (Attachment A). Itupdates the committee on the status of such resolutions. It covers committee resolutionsfrom February 2015 and will be updated for every regular meeting.

3. This report covers open resolutions only. A separate report has been placed in theconfidential agenda covering confidential resolutions requiring follow up reports.

4. The committee’s Forward Work Programme 2015/2016 is also attached for information(Attachment B).

Recommendation/sThat the Auckland Development Committee:

a) receive the reports pending status update.

Attachments

No. Title Page

A Auckland Development Committee - Reports Pending Status Update - 10September 2015

11

B Auckland Development Committee - Forward Work Programme2015/2016

13

Signatories

Author Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authoriser Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy


10/48


11/48

A t t a c h m e n t A

I t e m 9


10 September 2015



12/48


13/48

A t t a c h m e n t B

I t e m 9


10 September 2015



14/48

AttachmentB

Item 9


10 September 2015



15/48


I t e m 9


10 September 2015



16/48


17/48

I t e m 1

0


10 September 2015

Summary of information memos and briefings - 10 September 2015 Page 17

Summary of information memos and briefings - 10 September 2015

File No.: CP2015/18500

Purpose

1. To receive a summary and provide a public record of memos or briefing papers that mayhave been distributed to committee members since 13 August 2015.

Executive Summary2. This is a regular information-only report which aims to provide greater visibility of information

circulated to committee members via memo or other means, where no decisions arerequired.

3. The following presentations/memos were presented/circulated as follows:

1 September 2015: Development Auckland location analysis

30 August 2015: memo – tree legislation changes.

4. These and previous documents can be be found on the Auckland Council website, at thefollowing link:

http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/

o at the top of the page, select meeting “Auckland Development Committee” from the

drop-down tab and click ‘View’

o Under ‘Attachments’, select either HTML or PDF version of the document entitled ‘Extra

Attachments’.

5. Note that, unlike an agenda report, staff will not be present to answer questions aboutthese items referred to in this summary. Committee members should direct any

questions to the author.

Recommendation/sThat the Auckland Development Committee:

a) receive the summary of information memos and briefings – 10 September 2015.

Attachments

No. Title Page

A Memo : tree legislation changes (Under Separate Cover)

B Development Auckland location analysis presentation (Under SeparateCover)

Signatories

Author Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authoriser Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy

http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/


18/48


19/48

I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015

Special Housing Area programme for 2015/16 Page 19

Special Housing Area programme for 2015/16

File No.: CP2015/16690

Purpose

1. This report includes

a. an update on pending Special Housing Area (SHA) requests.

b. recommended refinements to the SHA establishment criteria.

Executive Summary2. The criteria used by the council in making SHA recommendations were adopted by the

Governing Body (CP2013/22237) on recommendation from the Auckland DevelopmentCommittee (ADC) in September 2013 (Attachment A).

3. A set of ‘additional considerations’ were agreed to by the Auckland Development Committeeon 16 April 2015 (CP2015/03932) to be used in conjunction with the principal criteria duringthe remainder of 2015 (Attachment B).

4. Rather than having two sets of criteria sitting alongside each other it is proposed that theSHA criteria be consolidated. Having consolidated criteria removes unnecessary duplicationof the existing criteria. Additionally, a series of questions and answers accompanying thecriteria makes it easier for the Housing Project Office (HPO) to apply and easier for thepublic and SHA requesters to understand the criteria. For reference, the HPO has prepareda spreadsheet showing the existing criteria, the refined and consolidated criteria andguidance as to the application of the criteria (Attachment C).

5. If the refined and consolidated criteria and guidance are adopted by the AucklandDevelopment Committee and endorsed by the Governing Body then the HPO will publish the

refined and consolidated criteria and guidance (Attachment D) on the council’s website andcommunicate this to interested parties. Having communicated the refined and consolidatedcriteria to existing requesters we will give these people an opportunity to provide furtherinformation on their request before the HPO makes its final recommendation to the ADC.

6. The HPO propose to apply the refined and consolidated criteria from the day following theGoverning Body meeting on 23 September 2015.

7. In addition to the refinements to the criteria, this report also recommends two significantprocess changes to streamline decision-making on SHA requests:

That the committee exercise its delegated authority to make recommendations on behalfof council to the Minister of Building and Housing, rather than referring itsrecommendations to the Governing Body, unless the timing of committee meetings or

special circumstances requires the matter to go before the Governing Body.

That the committee endorses that the HPO may decide not to refer to the Committee forconsideration SHA requests that do not satisfy the criteria 1 – 3 in Attachments C and D,which relate to section 16(3) of the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act2013. The HPO would still report to the committee on those requests that are supported,or where HPO takes the view that the request does not satisfy one or more of thecouncil’s criteria, other than criteria 1 – 3 in Attachments C and D.

8. There are currently 41 SHA requests under consideration by the Housing Project Office.


20/48

Item 11


10 September 2015


Recommendation/s


a) note that on 10 September 2013 the Governing Body endorsed criteria for thedefinition and establishment of Special Housing Areas (SHA) in accordance with the

Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 and the Auckland Housing Accord (10 September 2013, item 12, resolution number GB 2013/93).

b) note that on 16 April 2015 the Auckland Development Committee agreed to a specialhousing area programme for the remainder of 2015 that applies the existing SHAestablishment criteria with additional considerations (16 April 2015, item C3,resolution number AUC/2015/75).

c) note that these additional considerations were communicated to individuals andorganisations on the Housing Project Office’s list of SHA requesters and developers.

d) agree that the SHA establishment criteria and additional considerations would beimproved by refining and consolidating the criteria in a single document, and adopting

the following format:i) presentation of the criteria in question and answer form

ii) adopting guidance to explain how each criterion can be applied.

e) adopt the refined and consolidated criteria and explanatory guidance for assessingSHA requests in Attachment D, to be endorsed by the Governing Body and appliedfrom the day following the Governing Body endorsement, likely to be on 24September 2015.

f) agree that the refined and consolidated SHA critieria will be communicated tointerested parties and put on the council’s website.

g) agree that those with pending SHA requests will be invited to provide additionalinformation to supplement that already provided to the HPO.

h) note that the criteria are non-exhaustive and that the council has the discretionwhether or not to recommend a SHA.

i) note that clause 3.1 of the Governing Body Terms of Reference provide that the Auckland Development Committee has responsibility for SHA designations.

j) agree that the Auckland Development Committee exercise its delegated authority tomake recommendations on behalf of council to the Minister of Building and Housingon the designation of SHAs unless timing of committee meetings or specialcircumstances exist, that justify the matter to go to the Governing Body.

k) agree that the HPO may decide not to refer to the committee for consideration SHArequests that do not satisfy the criteria 1 – 3 in Attachments C and D, which relate tosection 16(3) of the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013. The HPOwould still report to the committee on those requests that are supported, or where theHPO takes the view that the request does not satisfy one or more of the council’scriteria, other than criteria 1 – 3 in Attachments C and D.

l) note that on 26 August 2015 there were 41 SHA requests under consideration by theHousing Project Office.


21/48

I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015


Discussion

Proposed refinements and consolidation of SHA establishment criteria

9. The Housing Project Office (HPO) has worked with internal and external legal advisers torefine and consolidate the existing SHA criteria to make it easier for the HPO to apply the

criteria to SHA requests and for the public to understand the criteria.

10. The intent of the refined and consolidated SHA establishment criteria in this report is to:

a. Bring the original criteria and the additional considerations from the 16 April AucklandDevelopment Committee meeting into one document;

b. Eliminate duplication between the original criteria and the additional considerations.

11. The additional considerations agreed by the committee on 16 April 2015 were:

a. application of the agreed basis (3 December 2014, item C1, resolution number AUC/2014/183) for SHAs on Maori-owned land / Maori special purpose land / treatysettlement land outside the Rural Urban Boundary;

b. a preference for brownfield SHA opportunities, pending completion of a Future UrbanLand Supply Strategy;

c. a preference for requests that are strategically important, at least 50 dwellings in yieldor exemplary with regard to the Auckland Plan, the outcomes and objectives of theProposed Auckland Unitary Plan and the objectives of the Auckland Housing Accord;

d. particular regard to the spatial priorities and infrastructure programme enabled by theproposed and final Long-term Plan and the need for greater certainty about funding ofany required local public infrastructure;

e. advice on the future programme for SHA establishment following the joint ministerial-

mayoral meeting scheduled for 15 April 2015.12. Following the decisions of the committee and endorsement by the Governing Body, the HPO

will communicate the criteria to interested parties, place the criteria on the council’s websiteand apply the criteria in its assessment and recommendations regarding SHA requests andall subsequent SHA recommendations to the committee.

Current SHA requests

13. There are currently 41 SHA requests under consideration by the HPO. In accordance withthe council’s 16 April 2015 additional considerations the council has a preference to awaitthe finalisation of the Future Urban Land Supply Strategy before recommending new SHAsin Future Urban Zone areas.

14. Other SHA requests relate to ‘live-zoned’ greenfield land or brownfield land. The HPO willgive priority in the Tranche 8 report to making recommendations on requests previouslyconsidered by the ADC but deferred for a number of reasons.

15. The HPO will aim to complete its consideration and make appropriate recommendations tothe committee on pending SHA requests by as soon as practicable following the GoverningBody’s endorsement of the committee’s decisions arising from this report.

16. The HPO also expects to make recommendations in October regarding the remainder ofSHA establishment programme in general, through to the end of the Accord, includingproposed dates after which council will no longer be able to accept new SHA requests,having regard to the time required to submit plan variation and consent applications.


22/48

Item 11


10 September 2015


Consideration

Local Board Views

17. The refined and consolidated criteria includes the consideration of whether the local board issupportive of the area being made a SHA.

18. The HPO is working with Local Board Services to improve the way in which information isshared with and feedback received from local boards regarding SHA requests. The HPOacknowledges the relatively short timeframes for decision making on SHA requests createsdifficulties so is seeking to provide other channels for the exchange of information in additionto reports on business meeting agendas, while having regard to the importance ofmaintaining the confidentiality of commercially sensitive information.

19. Local boards will be made aware of the committee’s decisions arising f rom this report.

Maori Impact Statement

20. The refined and consolidated criteria includes the consideration of whether the relevantmana whenua groups are supportive of the area being made a SHA.

21. In considering this criterion the HPO will work with mana whenua groups, the IndependentMaori Statutory Board and Te Waka Angamua to establish and refine the process for theHPO obtaining mana whenua views on confidential SHA requests.

22. Following input from mana whenua groups and advice from appropriate council staff, if it isestablished that a proposed SHA raises issues of significance for a mana whenua group, thecouncil will likely engage directly with that mana whenua group.

23. The views of mana whenua will be taken into account when council decides whether or notto support a SHA request.

Implementation Issues

24. The HPO propose to apply the refined and consolidated criteria from the day following theGoverning Body endorsement of these, likely to be on 24 September 2015.

25. If the recommendations in this report are agreed to by the Committee the HPO will ensurerelevant interested parties are made aware of the refinements to the criteria and the processfor establishing future SHAs. It will also initiate more direct engagement with iwi on SHArequests.

26. The recommendations do not trigger any requirement for consultation or council’ssignificance policy.

Attachments

No. Title Page

A Extract from Governing Body meeting minutes 10 September 2013 23

B Extract from Auckland Development Committee meeting minutes 16 April2015

25

C Existing and refined criteria 27

D Refined criteria and guidance 37

Signatories

Author David Clelland - Manager Growth & Infrastructure Strategy

Authorisers Ree Anderson - Project Director for Housing

Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer

Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy


23/48

A t t a c h m e n t A

I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015


Extract from the extraordinary meeting of the Governing Body held on Tuesday, 10 September2013

Was item 12: Criteria and process for establishing Special Housing Areas under the HousingAccords and Special Housing Areas legislation (HASHA)

Resolution number GB/2013/93

That the Governing Body:

a) endorse the following criteria for the definition and establishment of Special Housing Areas(SHAs) in accordance with the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas (HASHA)legislation and the Auckland Housing Accord:

1. Auckland Housing Accord

(a) Achieves a mix of brownfield and greenfield locations

(b) Zoned as Mixed Housing Suburban, Mixed Housing Urban, Terrace Housing andApartment Building, Mixed Use, Special Purpose (Maori land) or is contained within aprecinct, or any other urban zone where the qualifying development will contribute

to the purpose of the HASHA legislation.2. Auckland Plan and Notified Unitary Plan

(a) Consistent with Auckland Plan principles and intent for quality development

(b) Optimises infrastructure investment and supports a rational land release programme

(c) Located inside the notified Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) or an existing applicablezone

(d) Compatible with Unitary Plan provisions (e.g. heritage and special character; TreatySettlement Land).

3. Infrastructure availability and readiness

(a) Sufficient and appropriate infrastructure (physical and social) will be provided tosupport the development

(b) Compatibility of that proposed infrastructure with existing infrastructure(c) Compliance of proposed infrastructure with relevant infrastructure standards

(d) Capacity of proposed infrastructure and any existing infrastructure to supportdevelopment

(e) Infrastructure provider views (e.g. waste water, water supply, stormwater, transport,parks and open spaces, telecommunications, energy, healthcare, education).

4. Iwi requests and/or views:

(a) Direct requests where an iwi is the land owner, or

(b) Views of iwi on other locations including views expressed as part of a previousplanning stage.

5. Land owner requests and/or views: Direct requests from a land owner and their views

regarding the desired timing and benefits of being in an SHA.6. Location: Having reasonable access to employment and essential services.

7. Local board views gained through discussion with each local board.

8. Demand to build: Motivated developer ready to go, and likely to achieve early consentactivation and the intended yield of sites/dwellings within the Accord period.

9. Demand for housing: Evidence that new homes in an SHA will meet an existing need.

10. Affordability: Contribution to housing affordability either in terms of overall housingsupply or pricing of the intended housing product.

b) endorse the communication of these criteria to interested or affected parties and theirplacement on the council’s website along with other information on the HASHA legislationand the Accord.

c) approve the periodic reporting, generally on a quarterly basis, of potential SHAs forapproval to the relevant committee.


24/48


25/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015


Extract from the Auckland Development Committee meeting held on 16 April 2015.

Was item C3: Special Housing Area Programme for 2015

Resolution number AUC/2015/75


a) note that Auckland Housing Accord monitoring indicates that:

i) the first Accord year target was met, progress is on track to meet the second yeartarget, but the third year target remains a significant challenge

ii) Special Housing Areas (SHAs) established from this point forward will have lesslikelihood of contributing to the year three target than existing SHAs

iii) there are over 40 SHA requests that have not yet been fully assessed or reported fora final decision, as listed in Attachment 1, and more can be expected throughout theAccord period

iv) in addition to the existing criteria, in 2014 the Auckland Development Committee hasalso defined the basis for SHAs to be established on Maori owned land, Maoripurpose land and Treaty Settlement land.

b) agree to a special housing area establishment programme for the remainder of 2015 thatapplies the existing Special Housing Areas (SHAs) establishment criteria but with thefollowing additional considerations:

i) application of the agreed basis (3 December 2014, item C1, resolution numberAUC/2014/183) for SHAs on Maori-owned land / Maori special purpose land / treatysettlement land outside the Rural Urban Boundary

ii) a preference for brownfield SHA opportunities, pending completion of a FutureUrban Land Supply Strategy.

iii) a preference for requests that are strategically important, at least 50 dwellings inyield or exemplary with regard to the Auckland Plan, the outcomes and objectives ofthe Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan and the objectives of the Auckland Housing

Accord.iv) particular regard to the spatial priorities and infrastructure programme enabled by

the proposed and final Long Term Plan and the need for greater certainty aboutfunding of any required local public infrastructure

v) advice on the future programme for SHA establishment following the jointministerial-mayoral meeting scheduled for 15 April 2015

c) note that groups of new Special Housing Areas will be identified as follows: December2014 decisions are Tranche 5; April and May 2015 decisions will be Tranche 6, and June2015 decisions will be Tranche 7.

d) agree that requests received following 16 April 2015 will not be reported withrecommendations to this committee until July or August at the earliest, noting that this

does not prevent interested parties continuing to bring Special Housing Areas requests tothe Housing Project Office

e) support the Housing Project Office’s intention that appropriate actions are taken tomaximise the success of existing Special Housing Areas, including an assessment ofreasons for inactivity or slow activity in existing Special Housing Areas and a willingnessto explore with developers and landowners ways to generate or accelerate activity inSHAs

f) agree that the report and attachments regarding the ‘Special Housing Area Programme for2015’ remain confidential until all due processes have been concluded; and that theMayor/Deputy Mayor be delegated responsibility to release information on the SpecialHousing Areas as may be required.

g) express appreciation of all the work completed by the Housing Project Office, and the

quality of work undertaken.


26/48


27/48

A t t a c h m e n t C

I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



28/48

AttachmentC

Item 11


10 September 2015



29/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



30/48

AttachmentC

Item 11


10 September 2015



31/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



32/48

AttachmentC

Item 11


10 September 2015



33/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



34/48

AttachmentC

Item 11


10 September 2015



35/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



36/48

AttachmentC

Item 11


10 September 2015



37/48

A t t a c h m e n t D

I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



38/48

AttachmentD

Item 11


10 September 2015



39/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



40/48

AttachmentD

Item 11


10 September 2015



41/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



42/48

AttachmentD

Item 11


10 September 2015



43/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



44/48

AttachmentD

Item 11


10 September 2015



45/48


I t e m 1

1


10 September 2015



46/48


47/48


10 September 2015

Public Excluded Page 47

Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Informationand Meetings Act 1987


a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason forpassing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) ofthe Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolutionfollows.

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government OfficialInformation and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 orsection 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of theproceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:

C1 Confidential Reports Pending Status Update

Reason for passing this resolutionin relation to each matter

Particular interest(s) protected (whereapplicable)

Ground(s) under section 48(1) forthe passing of this resolution

The public conduct of the part ofthe meeting would be likely toresult in the disclosure ofinformation for which good reasonfor withholding exists undersection 7.

s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of theinformation is necessary to protectinformation where the making available ofthe information would be likelyunreasonably to prejudice thecommercial position of the person whosupplied or who is the subject of theinformation.

In particular, the report containscommercially sensitive informationregarding development proposals.

s7(2)(c)(i) - The withholding of theinformation is necessary to protectinformation which is subject to anobligation of confidence or which anyperson has been or could be compelledto provide under the authority of anyenactment, where the making available ofthe information would be likely toprejudice the supply of similar informationor information from the same source andit is in the public interest that suchinformation should continue to besupplied.

In particular, the report containscommercially sensitive informationregarding development proposals.

s48(1)(a)


C2 Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Submissions - Council position for Mediation andHearing - Puhinui Rural Urban Boundary




The public conduct of the part ofthe meeting would be likely toresult in the disclosure ofinformation for which good reason

for withholding exists undersection 7.

s7(2)(g) - The withholding of theinformation is necessary to maintain legalprofessional privilege.

In particular, the report contains legaladvice.

s48(1)(a)



48/48


10 September 2015

C3 Stormwater Land Acquisition - Hugh's Way, Flat Bush




The public conduct of the part of

the meeting would be likely toresult in the disclosure ofinformation for which good reasonfor withholding exists undersection 7.

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the

information is necessary to enable thelocal authority to carry on, withoutprejudice or disadvantage, negotiations(including commercial and industrialnegotiations).

In particular, the report containsinformation regarding the valuation of thepropopsed land to be acquired.

s7(2)(j) - The withholding of theinformation is necessary to prevent thedisclosure or use of official information forimproper gain or improper advantage.

In particular, the report containsinformation regarding the valuation of thepropopsed land to be acquired.

s48(1)(a)


C4 Compulsory acquisition of easements for stormwater purposes





s7(2)(i) - The withholding of theinformation is necessary to enable thelocal authority to carry on, withoutprejudice or disadvantage, negotiations(including commercial and industrialnegotiations).

In particular, the report containsinformation which could impact onproperty values and negotiations withlandowners.

s48(1)(a)

The public conduct of the part ofthe meeting would be likely toresult in the disclosure ofinformation for which good reason

for withholding exists undersection 7.

auckland development committee - september 15 - agenda

Documents