augmentative & alternative communication for … · augmentative & alternative...

28
AUGMENTATIVE & ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM Jolene Hyppa Martin, MA, CCC-SLP [email protected] Joe Reichle, PhD [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 29-Mar-2020

18 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

AUGMENTATIVE & ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM

Jolene Hyppa Martin, MA, CCC-SLP [email protected] Joe Reichle, PhD [email protected]

Agenda

1.  What is AAC? 2.  Characteristics of the Population 3.  AAC & Speech 4.  Matching AAC to Learner Needs 5.  AAC to Support Expression & Comprehension 6.  Current Researchable Issues

What is AAC?

¨  Language, speech & communication ¤ Language- socially shared code ¤ Speech- one means of expressing language ¤ Communication- exchanging thoughts & information

¨  Modes of communication ¤ Vocal ¤ Gestural ¤ Graphic

Advantages & Disadvantages

(Reichle, 1991) Advantages Disadvantages

Vocal •  Portable •  Quick to produce •  Widely used

•  Transient •  Burden on memory •  Motor skills

Gestural •  Portable •  Quick to produce •  Some are easily

guessed

•  Burden on memory •  Motor skills •  Few understand signs

Graphic •  Non-transient longer to comprehend

•  Recognition vs recall •  Many are easily

understood by others

•  Portability •  Dependence on others

to create •  Navigation

What is AAC?

¨  AAC Defined ¤ Any mode of communication that supplements or

replaces speech ¤ Permanent or temporary ¤ Expression and comprehension

(ASHA, 2013)

What is AAC?

¨  *Aided AAC ¤ Requires tools or equipment external to one’s body

n  Pencil/paper n  Picture symbols n  Speech-generating “talking” computers

¨  Unaided AAC ¤ Uses only one’s body

n  Signs n  Gestures n  Facial expressions

What is AAC?

¨  Levels of AAC Technology ¤ Low Tech ¤ Mid Tech ¤ Hi Tech

¨  One goal: ¤ To support individuals to be as independent and

competent in communication as possible

Characteristics of the Population

¨  About 50% of individuals with ASDs present with non-functional speech

n  (Wendt & Schlosser, 2007; Weitz, Dexter & Moore, 1997)

¨  Challenging Behaviors

¨  No longer a candidacy model, a participation model

n  (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013)

Characteristics of the Population ¨  Graphic Mode AAC & Autism- A good match?

n  (Cafiero, 2005)

Learner Characteristic Graphic Mode AAC Characteristic

Visual learner Visual cues & information

Trouble with complex cues Level of complexity can be matched, expanded with learner

Resistant to change Static & predictable

Difficulties with social interaction

Can provide a buffer and/or bridge between social partners

Behavioral challenges Can preempt challenging behaviors

Difficulties recalling words or holding messages in working memory

Relies on recognition, not recall

AAC & Speech ¨  Not a “last resort” ¨  Relationships

n  lack of functional speech, social experiences, language development

n  Lack of functional speech & challenging behavior

¨  AAC should be considered for all individuals with ASDs (Wegner, 2012)

¨  AAC + speech ¨  AAC and collateral speech production

(Schlosser & Wendt, 2008)

Graphic Mode AAC

¨  Receptive and Expressive Communication

¨  The Evidence Base

¨  Recent Developments in Graphic Mode AAC n  Increases in ASD diagnoses (CDC, 2009)

n Technological advances n AAC assessment “tables turning”

Matching AAC to Learner Needs

¨  Current needs ¨  Future needs

¨  Feature-matching: ¤ Contexts and settings ¤ Partners ¤ Culture ¤ Learner characteristics

(Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013)

¤ Vision ¤ Motor - access ¤ Communication needs ¤ Portability ¤ Type of graphic

symbol ¤ Type of display ¤ And more...

Grid vs. Visual Scene Display

Matching AAC to Learner Needs

¨  One size does not fit all! ¨  Sources of evidence ¨  Least dangerous

assumptions ¨  Let learner performance

inform intervention ¤ Examples:

n  Symbol type n  Mode

Matching AAC to Learner Needs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Session 1

Session 2

Session 3

Session 4

Session 5

Session 6

Session 7

Vocal

Gestural

Graphic

AAC to Support Expression

AAC to Support Expression

AAC to Support Comprehension

AAC to Support Comprehension

8:00-8:30Free Play

8:30-9:00Activity

9:00-9:30Story time

9:30-9:45Snack time

9:45-10:15 Art

10:15-10:45Outside

10:45-11:30 Free Play

11:30-11:45clean up/bus

Snack Time 9:30-9:45

wash hands getplacemats

sit in chair put napkinin lap

Contingency Map

Outcomes of AAC Interventions ¨  Reductions in Challenging Behavior

n  (Bopp, Brown & Mirenda, 2004; Reichle & Dropik, 2001; Doss & Reichle, 1989)

¨  Expressive Language n  (Millar, 2009; Sigafoos, 1998; Frost & Bondy, 1994; Reichle &

Brown, 1986)

¨  Comprehension & Receptive Language n  (Brady, 2000; Wood, et al., 1998; Quill, 1997; Hodgdon, 1995)

¨  Self-regulation n  (Reichle & Halle, 2002; Pierce & Schreibman, 1994; Hall,

McClannahan & Krantz, 1995)

¨  Social Interaction n  (Higginbotham, et al., 2007; Garrison-Harrell, Kamps & Kravits,

1997)

Instructional Strategies

Prelock & McCauley, 2012 Mirenda & Iacono, 2009

Current Researchable Issues

¨  Reducing cognitive load ¨  Selection of initial graphic mode vocabulary ¨  Cultural considerations ¨  Parent & care partner support ¨  Speech & AAC ¨  Literacy ¨  Social Experiences

(For additional discussion: Light, 2012)

Agenda

1.  What is AAC? 2.  Characteristics of the Population 3.  AAC & Speech 4.  Matching AAC to Learner Needs 5.  AAC to Support Expression & Comprehension 6.  Current Researchable Issues

Selected Resources

¨  Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Connecting Young Kids (YAACK) http://aac.unl.edu/yaack/

¨  Beukelman, D. & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs, (4th ed.). Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD.

¨  Johnston, S., Reichle, J., Feeley, K. & Jones, E. (2012). AAC Strategies for Individuals with Moderate to Severe Disabilities. Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD.

¨  Light, J. & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the Communication, Language, and Literacy Development of Children with Complex Communication Needs: State of the Science and Future Research Priorities. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 24(1), 34.

¨  Mirenda, P. (2001). Autism, Augmentative Communication and Assistive Technology: What Do We Really Know? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16 (3), 141.

¨  Mirenda, P. & Iacono, T. (2009). Autism Spectrum Disorders and AAC. D. Beukelman & J. Reichle (Eds.). Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD.

¨  Prelock, P. & McCauley, R. (2012). Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Evidence-based Strategies for Communication and Social Interactions. Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD.

¨  Schlosser, R. & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of AAC Intervention on Speech Production in Children with Autism: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212.

AUGMENTATIVE & ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM

Jolene Hyppa Martin, MA, CCC-SLP [email protected] Joe Reichle, PhD [email protected]