august 2013
DESCRIPTION
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development. August 2013. 1. Agenda. Connecting to District and School Goals Learning what Makes a SMART and SMARTer Goal Implementing Wrap-Up. Intended Outcomes. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development
August 2013
1
Agenda
Connecting to District and School Goals Learning what Makes a SMART and
SMARTer Goal Implementing Wrap-Up
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
2
Intended Outcomes
At the end of this session, participants will be able to:Identify characteristics of “not-so-S.M.A.R.T.,” “S.M.A.R.T.,” and “S.M.A.R.T.er” goals.Translate student learning and professional practice goals into S.M.A.R.T.er goals.Develop a sample Educator Plan that describes what the educator and evaluator will do, support that will be provided, and timelines.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
3
Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Every educator conducts an analysis
of evidence of student learning,
growth, and achievement.
Every educator conducts an assessment of practice against
Performance Standards.
Every educator prepares to
strategically identify professional practice and student learning
goals.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
4
Goal setting and plan development facilitates a process that… Promotes professional growth and
continuous learning by empowering educators and by meeting real needs of the educator and his or her students.
Establishes a plan for every educator that emphasizes continuous improvement.
Keeps student learning at the core of all instructional and professional practice decisions.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
5
Coherence Through Aligned Goals
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
6
An Example of Goal CoherenceDan, a ninth-grade biology teacher:
Level Goal Topic
School Improvement Grants focus topic
Literacy
Individual student learning goal topic
Scientific reading and writing
Team professional practice goal topic
Teaching content literacy in ninth-grade science
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
7
S.M.A.R.T. Goals
S = Specific and Strategic
M = Measurable
A = Action Oriented
R = Rigorous, Realistic, and Results Focused (the 3 Rs)
T = Timed and Tracked
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
8
What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”?Individually: Read “What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”?” Underline one phrase that you find most
significant in the reading.At your table: Pair with a partner. Discuss the phrases that emerged and any
insights about the document.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
9
Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals
Work with a partner. Determine if each of the four statements on the
handout are S.M.A.R.T. or if they need revision. Revise one statement to make it S.M.A.R.T.er.
I will improve student outcomes in Grade 4 mathematics during the 2012–13 school year. –Teacher LevelDuring the 2012–13 school year, our beginner ELL students will improve their English language proficiency as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year. –Team LevelTo increase my staff’s use of student data, I will design meetings to review, analyze, and interpret student data to inform curriculum and instruction. –Administrator LevelI will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency of classroom observations. –Administrator Level
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
10
Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals
S = Specific and Strategic
M = Measurable
A = Action Oriented
R = Rigorous, Realistic, and Results Focused (the 3 Rs)
T = Timed and Tracked
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
11
Goal StatementExample Revision
I will improve student outcomes in Grade 4 mathematics during the 2012–13 school year.
–Teacher Level
I will improve student performance on district-created benchmarks from 47.5 percent proficient (baseline) to 80 percent proficient in Grade 4 mathematics during the 2012–13 school year.
During the 2012–13 school year, our beginner ELL students will improve English language proficiency as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year.
–Team Level
During the 2012–13 school year, at least 80 percent of our beginner ELL students will improve English language proficiency in all language domains as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
12
Goal Statement Example Revision
To increase my staff’s use of student data, I will design meetings to review, analyze, and interpret student data to inform curriculum and instruction.
–Administrator Level
To increase my staff’s use of student data, I will schedule monthly meetings for each department in which our data team works with teachers to review, analyze, and interpret student data to inform lesson planning, assessment, teaching strategies, and instructional interventions.
I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency of classroom observations.
–Administrator Level
I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency and impact of classroom observations by learning how to do 10-minute observations with feedback, and by the start of the second semester, conducting eight visits per week, on average, that an increasing percentage of teachers report are useful.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
13
Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals
With members of your team, use the goal setting form to draft two goals:o Student Learning SMART Goalo Professional Practice SMART Goals
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
14
Student Learning Goal vs. Professional Practice Goal Student Learning Goal (Individual):
In order to ensure mathematical literacy in each of the three content areas for eighth-grade geometry, I will incorporate essay questions into unit assessments that require elaboration of mathematical reasoning so that by the end of 2012-2013 school year, 80% or more of my students demonstrate proficiency on essay questions on the end-of-the-year eighth grade geometry assessment.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
15
Student Learning Goal vs. Professional Practice Goal Professional Practice Goal (Team):
Our eighth-grade mathematics team will become more familiar with instructional strategies to provide access to the mathematics curriculum for students with disabilities, such that we are able to implement a minimum of five targeted strategies by the end of the 2012-2013 school year and see improvements in the students’ achievement in mathematics as a result.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
16
Making a S.M.A.R.T. Goal S.M.A.R.T.er
S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statement+
Key Action Steps+
Benchmarks (Process and Outcome)
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
17
Educator Plan Development
Educator Plan Form
Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity
Action Supports/Resources From School/District
Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
18
Principal Educator Plan Example
Sample Professional Practice Goal for a Principal: I will manage my time more effectively in order to increase the frequency and impact of classroom observations by learning how to do 10-minute observations with feedback and, by the start of the second semester, conducting eight visits per week, on average, that an increasing percentage of teachers report are useful.
Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity
Action Supports/ Resources From School/District
Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency
1. By September 1, I will develop a schedule and method for logging at least eight classroom observations with feedback per week between October 15 and Memorial Day.2. By October 15, I will study with colleague principals and my administrative team how to conduct 10-minute unannounced observations and write brief, useful feedback.3. By January 1, I will share at least five samples of feedback with colleague principals and collect their feedback.4. By January 1 and again on June 1, I will solicit anonymous feedback from teachers about their perceptions of the usefulness of the unannounced visits and feedback.
Superintendent to facilitate teams of principals to collaborate on enhancing the observation and feedback process. Superintendent will help identify teams and provide scheduled time to hold study groups and conduct feedback sessions.
1. September 1—schedule developedJanuary 15/March 15/May 15—check in to determine if eight observations per week (on average) have been completed2. October 15—documented study time with colleague3. January 1—five feedback samples will be shared with colleagues4. January 1 and June 1—will have collected feedback via teachers regarding their perceived value of the process
*Evidence provided through principals’ logs and example artifacts
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
19
Process and Outcome Benchmarks Process benchmarks—monitor plan
implementationo January 15/March 15/May 15—check in to
determine if eight observations per week (on average) have been completed
Outcome benchmarks—monitor effectiveness of the plano January 1 and June 1—will have collected
feedback via teachers regarding their perceived value of the process
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
20
Implementation Responsibility
Educator Responsibilities:o Identifying, collecting & organizing artifacts/evidence
related to goal progress.o Documenting action steps completed.o Collecting and submitting common artifacts.o Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III
and IV.
Evaluator Responsibilities:o Making resources and supports available.o Identifying common artifacts/evidence.o Observing practice and providing regular and specific
feedback on performance.o Monitoring progress – including midpoint check-ins.
21
Laying the Foundation
1. School teams will work together to develop a completed educator plan.
2. As a team, identify SMART goals. 3. Identify action steps.4. Outline supports and resources and determine a
timeline.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
22
Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity
Action Supports/Resources From School/District
Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence
September 2013Melrose Public Schools
23
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
Unpacking the Rubrics
September 2012Melrose Public Schools
24
Intended Outcomes
At the end of this session, participants will be able to:
Identify the characteristics of effective practice.Understand the use of standards-based rubrics and use of the four performance descriptors to analyze and assess practice.Describe the structure of the Massachusetts Model Rubrics.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
25
Five-Step Evaluation Cycle: Rubrics
26
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Model Rubrics
Teacher Rubric Specialized Instructional Support
Personnel (SISP) Rubric School-Level Administrator
(Principal) Rubric District-Level Administrator
(Superintendent) Rubric
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
27
Massachusetts Teacher Rubric
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment
Indicator A
Element 1
Element 2
Element 1
Indicator B
Element 2
Performance Descriptors
UnsatisfactoryNeeds ImprovementProficientExemplary
Performance Descriptors
UnsatisfactoryNeeds ImprovementProficientExemplary
28
29
Four Performance Standards
Teachers
Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment
Teaching All Students
Family and Community Engagement
Professional Culture
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
30
Elements
Indicator
Standard
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
31
Standard
Indicator
Elements
Performance Descriptors
Massachusetts Teacher Performance Rubric
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
32
Standards: Broad categories of knowledge and skills
Indicators: Specific knowledge, skills, and behaviors for each standard
Elements: Subcategories of knowledge, skills, and behaviors for each indicator
Performance Descriptors:Unsatisfactory – Needs Improvement – Proficient – Exemplary
Learning Activity: Teacher Performance Rubric—What Does It Look Like?
Reflect on Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment
Guiding questions: What does the teacher need to know, understand, and be able to do to demonstrate effectiveness for that standard? What are some of the critical knowledge, skills, and behaviors that you would expect to see or hear? Write your ideas on your stick person.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
33
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
34
Knowledge and Understandings Teachers would
have
Actions the Teacher Takes
Words the Teacher Would Use
Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment. The teacher promotes the learning and growth of all students by providing high-quality and coherent instruction, designing and administering authentic and meaningful student assessments, analyzing student performance and growth data, using this data to improve instruction, providing students with constructive feedback on an ongoing basis, and continuously refining learning objectives.
Proficient
“Proficient is the expected, rigorous level of performance for educators. It is the demanding but attainable level of performance for most educators.”
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
35
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
36
Examining Proficient Practice
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
37
Example: Standard II: Teaching All Students
Guiding questions:1. What does Proficient performance look like? What, exactly,
would you expect a teacher to be doing?2. Using your own words, describe Proficient performance for
your Indicator, as demonstrated across the elements.
Indicator IIA. Instruction: Uses instructional practices that reflect high expectations regarding content and quality of effort and work; engage all students; and are personalized to accommodate diverse learning styles, needs, interests, and levels of readiness.
Element II A-2. Student Engagement Proficient: Consistently uses instructional practices that are likely to motivate and engage most students during the lesson.
Examining Key Expectations for Performance Across Levels
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
38
1. Read across the rows for each element.
2. Highlight the key descriptions of performance at each level.
3. Look down the column (across elements) and circle the key words or ideas that best summarize each of the four performance levels.
Horizontal and Vertical Analysis: Example I-B
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
39
I-B.
ElementsUnsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary
I-B-1.
Variety of Assessment Methods
Administers only the assessments required by the school and/or measures only point-in-time student achievement.
May administer some informal and/or formal assessments to measure student learning but rarely measures student progress toward achieving state/local standards.
Designs and administers a variety of informal and formal methods and assessments, including common interim assessments, to measure each student’s learning, growth, and progress toward achieving state/local standards.
Uses an integrated, comprehensive system of informal and formal assessments, including common interim assessments, to measure student learning, growth, and progress toward achieving state/local standards. Is able to model this element.
I-B-2.
Adjustment to Practice
Makes few adjustments to practice based on formal and informal assessments.
May organize and analyze some assessment results but only occasionally adjusts practice or modifies future instruction based on the findings.
Organizes and analyzes results from a variety of assessments to determine progress toward intended outcomes and uses these findings to adjust practice and identify and/or implement appropriate differentiated interventions and enhancements for students.
Organizes and analyzes results from a comprehensive system of assessments to determine progress toward intended outcomes and frequently uses these findings to adjust practice and identify and/or implement appropriate differentiated interventions and enhancements for individuals and groups of students and appropriate modifications of lessons and units. Is able to model this element.
Indicator I-B. Assessment: Uses a variety of informal and formal methods of assessments to measure student learning, growth, and understanding to develop differentiated and enhanced learning experiences and improve future instruction.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
Gathering Evidence
September 2012Melrose Public Schools
40
Intended Outcomes
At the end of this session, participants will be able to:Explain the three types of evidence required by regulations, and identify concrete examples of each.Create evidence-based statements, and connect these statements to relevant Standards and Indicators.Identify tools and processes for gathering and organizing evidence. 41
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
42
Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Every educator and evaluator collects
evidence and assesses progress
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
What does this look like?Products of Practice Related to Standards
Multiple Measures of Student Learning
Other Evidence Related to Standards
Artifacts
•Teacher-developed unit assessments
•Grade-level meeting notes
•Parent/teacher communication log
•PLC meeting notes
Observations•Notes/feedback from short, frequent observations (inside/outside classrooms)
•Notes and feedback from announced observations
•Student work (quizzes, homework, presentations, etc.)
•Portfolios
•Performance assessments (including arts, vocational, health and wellness)
•Interim assessments
•State or district assessments
•Student and staff feedback (2013–14 school year)
43
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Implementation Responsibility
Educator responsibilities:o Identifying, collecting, and organizing artifacts/evidence
related to goal progresso Documenting action steps completedo Collecting and submitting common artifactso Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III
and IV Evaluator responsibilities:
o Making resources and supports availableo Identifying common artifacts/evidenceo Observing practice and providing regular and specific
feedback on performanceo Monitoring progress—including midpoint check-inso Organizing and analyzing evidence over time
44
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Artifacts in the Educator Plan
Review the Educator Goal Setting and Educator Plan form for Tom Wilson.
For each action step, write down two artifacts that could be collected to show progress toward the goal.
Post your sticky note on the section of the chart paper with the same number as your action step.
45
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Artifact Cover Page
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
46
Running Record of Evidence Form
47
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts
OR
48
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts Artifacts should be a sample that
demonstrates educator performance and impact:o Aligned with educator goals, the Model
System Teacher Rubric, or school goals Number of artifacts to collect varies by
educator Artifacts can provide evidence of more
than one Standard or Indicator 49
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Strategies for Collecting Artifacts Identify common artifacts that all or
most educators will be expected to collect (e.g., lesson plans)
Share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings:oMight include showing sample artifacts
that provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator 50
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Artifacts From Tom Wilson
51
Five artifacts with partially completed Artifact Cover Pages
Set Artifacts Location
A A two-day lesson plan Handout 3
B Unit assessment dataTeam meeting minutes
Handouts 4 and 5
C Parent communication logE-mail exchange
Handouts 6 and 7
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Identifying Evidence in Artifacts Within your grade level/department teams,
divide into pairs. Each pair will do the following: o Review one set of artifacts.o Complete the Artifact Cover Page for those two
artifacts.o Consider these questions:
– After reviewing these artifacts, what else might you want to know about Tom’s practice?
– What would you want to ask this teacher?
52
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
To Recap…Three categories of evidence:
1. Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement
2. Judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice
3. Additional evidence relevant to standards
53
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
1. Support
2. Organize
3. Communicate
54
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
1. SupportSet Your School Up for Success
The more concrete the Educator Plan, the easier it is to identify and collect artifacts.
Share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings:
o Demonstrate example artifacts that provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator.
Identify common artifacts that all or most educators will be expected to collect (unit assessments, parent-teacher logs, etc.).
55
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
2. Organize
Adopt a process for organizing artifacts and observation notes by Standard or Indicator and/or goals:o Paper-based, e-mail-driven, or online “cloud-
based” system Calendar:o Review actions in Educator Plans and make
agreed-upon supports and resources available to educator teams and individuals throughout the year.
o Identify key points of contact throughout the year (observations and feedback, formative assessment conferences, and summative evaluations).
56
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
3. Communicate Expectations
Avoiding the…
OR
57
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
3. Communicate Expectations
Artifacts should be a sample that demonstrates educator performance and impact.
Evidence should be clearly tied to educator goals, Standards, or Indicators.
Provide everyone with a clear idea of what, how, and when to share products of practice.
58
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Back at your school…
Work with your team to identify how you will:
1. Support,2. Organize, and3. Communicate expectations
related to the collection of evidence at your school.
59
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education