AUSA ILW LANPAC 2018Forum 2: Industry

Multi-Domain Operations in the Pacific

U.S. Army PacificOne Team!

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Agenda

2

• Panel Introduction• Multi-Domain Operations Overview• Desired Capabilities• Fires• Intelligence• Mission Command • Space and Cyber• Aviation • Sustainment

• Cooperative Research and Development Agreement• Questions and Answers• Break Out

UNCLASSIFIED 3

Multi-Domain Operations Overview

Mr. Scott Norwood

UNCLASSIFIED

Multi-Domain Operations in the Pacific

4

“To me . . . the Army’s got to be able to sink ships, neutralize satellites, shoot down missiles, and deny the enemy the ability to command and control its forces.”

Admiral Harry Harris, PACOM CDR

“The potential of Multi-Domain battleis not measured in years…it is now…and generated by capabilities, systems, material, partnerships and most importantly – our people.”

General Robert Brown, USARPAC CDR

UNCLASSIFIED

Battlefield Framework: AirLand Battle

5

Areainwhichoperationsareconductedindepthtosecureadvantagesinlaterengagements,protectthecurrentclosefight,anddefeattheenemymorerapidlybydenyingfreedomofactionanddisruptingordestroyingthecoherenceandtempoofitsoperations.

Area inwhichoffensive ordefensiveoperationsareconducted,whereforcesareinimmediatecontactwiththeenemy.

CloseArea DeepArea

Area inwhichoperationsareconductedthatassistinprovidingfreedomofactionandcontinuityofoperations,logistics,andbattlecommand.Primarypurposesare tosustainthecurrentcloseanddeepfightsandtoposturetheforceforfurtheroperations.

RearArea

AirLand Battle Operational Framework’s Three SpacesArmed

Con

flict

Operations conducted at tactical and operational levels of war.

UNCLASSIFIED

Battlefield Framework: Global Expansion & Compression

6

CannotDisplaySpatially

Beyondfeasiblerangeofconventionalforces;where jointfires,specialoperationsforces(SOF),infoandvirtual capabilitiescanbeemployed

Conventionalmaneuver (groundormaritime) requiressignificantsupportfrommulti-domaincapabilities;commandersmustmakeaconcertedeffortto“breakinto”

Friendlyandenemyformations,forces,andsystemsinimminentphysicalcontactcontestingforcontrolofphysicalspaceinsupportofcampaignobjectives

Cross-CCMDcoordination,strategicsea/air LOCs,andthehomeland.

KeyJointForceC2,sustainment,andfires/strikecapabilitiesarelocated(landorsea-based).

DirectlyenablesoperationsintheClose,DeepManeuver,andDeepFiresAreas

StrategicSupportArea

OperationalSupportArea

TacticalSupportArea

CloseArea

DeepManeuverArea

DeepFiresArea

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED

MDTF Key Concepts

7

*Theoperationalconstructforemployingcross-domainfirescapabilitiesoftheMDTFappliesirrespectiveofgeographicallocation(archipelagicorcontinentalenvironment.

• CalibrateForcePosture

• ResilientForces

• ConvergeCapabilities

• HumanDimension

• Joint&CombinedIntegration

• RapidCapabilitiesDevelopment

• StrategicCommunications

• Evolutionary,but…

UNCLASSIFIED 8

Fires

COL Tony Crawford

UNCLASSIFIED

Fires

Capabilities Need to Be:1. Precise2. Responsive3. Effective4. Multifunctional

Desired Technologies• Shore-to-ship capabilities• Seeker capabilities• Long Range Precision Strike capabilities• Long Range Sensor capabilities• Directed Energy > Counter-Unmanned Aerial Surveillance• Hypervelocity Projectile (HVP)

Required Capabilities:• Ability to detect targets in all domains, utilizing both non-organic linkages & persistent 360-degree organic sensors• Ability to deliver 360-degree fires against moving, displaced, & stationary targets• Fires capabilities to engage targets at extended ranges• Persistent sensor-to-shooter linkages to deliver responsive fires• Mobility, survivability, & protection commensurate with the supported force• Improved ability to sense & engage Rocket, Artillery, Mortar (RAM), Theater Ballistic Missiles (TBM), Unmanned Aerial

Systems (UAS), & other aerial threats • Rapid & accurate Mission Command (Command & Control) capabilities/systems that allow Fires to plan, prepare,

execute, assess, & integrate collaboratively with Joint, Army, inter-organizational, & multinational capabilities/systems 9

UNCLASSIFIED 10

Intelligence

COL Jason Chung

UNCLASSIFIED

Evolution of the Operating Environment

11

U2 UAV Artificial Intelligence

Multi Domain COPSingle Domain

Air Space Dominance Contested Environments

Joint Interoperability

Positional Disadvantage

PAST PRESENT FUTURE

Our intelligence task remains the same; how we do it has changed. How we access and leverage data to achieve and maintain information dominance is the center of gravity for success in future conflict.

UNCLASSIFIED

“The Find and the Fix”

12

Five Essential Characteristics of theMulti-Domain Kill Chain – “D5”

Data Ingestion

Data Correlation

Data Translation

Data Visualization

Data Dissemination

A data AGNOSTIC, SINGLE display of relevant Information to Support Commanders Decision-making and Enhance Situational

Awareness (Common Sight Picture)

Data Information Knowledge Understanding

UNCLASSIFIED 13

Mission Command

COL Jim Turinetti

UNCLASSIFIED

Mission Command

14

Capabilities Need to Be:1. Mobile2. Expeditionary3. Resilient4. Survivable

Desired Technologies• Jam Resistant Transmission Systems• Bandwidth Efficient Software• Mobile, Light and Adaptable Transmission Systems• Integrated Common Operating and Intel Pictures• Flexible / Simple Network Management • Combat Emerging Cyber Security Threats

Required Capabilities:• Ability to communicate in an environment where the Electro-Magnetic Spectrum is being challenged • C2 Systems should be able to leverage multiple communication paths and options depending on the environment• HQ TOC Mission Command systems should be agile and scalable • Systems should be able to leverage enterprise or ‘cloud’ capability but also be functional during disconnected

periods• Software and Hardware need to integrate across the Army, Joint Force, and collection of unified action partners• Should continue to operate in a Position/Navigation/Timing (PNT) denied environment• MC systems need the ability to operate over multiple classification levels• Spectrum obfuscation and electronic signature reduction• Allow Commanders to make rapid decisions

5. Protected6. Intuitive7. Interoperable8. Sustainable

UNCLASSIFIED 15

Space & Cyber

COL Eric Little

UNCLASSIFIED

Space & Cyber

16

Capabilities Need to Be:1. Responsive2. Resilient3. Survivable4. Redundant

Space and Cyber Key Points:• Intelligence, Cyber, Electronic Warfare, Space (ICEWS) element of MDTF a “game changer” • MDTF will implement and employ existing strategic capabilities at the tactical and operational levels• Space and Cyber domain activities will likely precede kinetic activities• Primary challenges to the employment and synchronization of Space and Cyber effects:

• Authorities• Command and Control (C2) and clearance of fires (kinetic and non-kinetic)

• C2, authorities, and the inability to share information (classification) is a hindrance to responsive non-lethal capabilities/effects; imperative to streamline in order to meet operational commander’s timing and tempo

UNCLASSIFIED 17

Aviation

LTC Karl Krievins

UNCLASSIFIED

Aviation

18

Capabilities Need to Be:1. Precise2. Responsive3. Effective4. Multifunctional

Desired Technologies• Over-the-horizon capability• Long-range precision strike / sensor capabilities• Operate in degraded environments• Manned unmanned teaming (MUM-T)• Runway independent / point launch & recovery

Required Capabilities:• Ability to detect targets and deliver fires against airborne, surface, & submerged targets• Capabilities to locate and engage targets at extended ranges/over the horizon• Persistent sensor-to-shooter linkages to deliver responsive fires• Work collaboratively with the Joint force, our inter-organizational, & multinational capabilities/systems

UNCLASSIFIED 19

Sustainment

Mr. Dutch Heath

UNCLASSIFIED

Sustainment

20

Our Challenge – deploying and sustaining a geographically dispersed conventional force with current technology to enhance endurance (> 7 Days of Supply, DOS) and enhance mobility (100%) using a mostly commercial strategic and operational sustainment system in a contested and potentially Command and Control Denied or Degraded Environment (C2D2E).

“A contested environment is one in which a geo-political competitor or adversary (or a combination of the two) uses kinetic or non-kinetic capabilities to disrupt, delay, or deny operations of the U.S. or allied governments, agencies, and militaries in any domain and in any operational phase.” - USTRANSCOM FDDA V Phase 1 Report August 2015 -

Command and Control in a Denied or Degraded Environment (C2D2E)- US Navy, 2012 -

Current Deployment and Sustainment Model

PortBaseBCT SLOCGLOC

Sustainment Piles

Future Deployment and Sustainment Model

CONUSMDTF SLOC/ALOCBCT

BCT “Army forces conduct expeditionary movement over strategic distances and transition rapidly to cross-domain maneuver of sufficient scale and duration to accomplish operational objectives…The capability to enter a theater at just about any point with combat configured, highly mobile, and lethal forces provides Joint Force commanders with options to surprise the enemy and present multiple dilemmas.”- U.S. Army Functional Concept for Movement and Maneuver, 2020-2040, Feb 2017 -

BCT

BCT

GLOC

In-Theater

CONUSIn-Theater

Requires persistent multi-domain dominance

Operates with temporary domain dominance

Sustainment Piles

Current Force

Future Force

OptBaseCurrent Force Future Force• Based on BCTs • BCTs and MDTF• Requires significant

external support• Semi-Independent

(>7 DOS, 100% mobile)• High consumption • Significantly reduced

consumption (e.g. 50% fuel reduction)

• Joint Capable • Joint Integrated

20

Desired Capabilities• Commercial partners capable of operating in the future environment• Technologies to enable, deploy and sustain the future force• Point of Need Delivery (reduce requirement for stockpiles)• Enhanced Sustainment Common Operating Picture (COP)• Enhanced medical capabilities at BCT level

UNCLASSIFIED 21

Cooperative Research & Development Agreement

(CRADA)

COL Paul Alessio

UNCLASSIFIED

Proposed USARPAC & RDECOMTechnology Transfer & Collaboration Strategy

22

• RDECOM CRADA: A RDECOM Agreement between executing RDECs & ARL and Industry - executed by a RDECOM lab

• Between – USARPAC, RDECOM, and Industry• RDEC lab drafts CRADA & co-signs with Industry partner • Focus on USARPAC MDTF-Pilot Program Technology Focus

Areas (FedBiz Notice: 9 May 18)

• Purpose: Introduce S&T opportunities to validate the MDTF concept

• Proposed Technology Transfer Execution:• MOU between RDECOM and USARPAC • Standardized CRADA Template co-developed between RDECOM and

USARPAC• MDTF CRADA FedBiz Special Notice to industry 9 May 18 • Individual RDEC/Lab collaboration with industry partner• Establish a Council of Colonel’s for approval and review• Military User Assessments (MUA) thru USARPAC/PACOM MDTF-PP

experimentation events

UNCLASSIFIED

Tech Transfer/CRADA Business Case

23

• Partnerships will:

• Enable S&T early involvement

• Address MDTF Technology Focus Areas and align S&T community initiatives

• Enable technology insertion into MDTF-PP Experimentation events including War-gamming & Modeling and Simulation

• Accelerate MDTF concept development and technology prototyping to inform decision maker(s) on “art of the possible” knowledge of MDTF related technology

UNCLASSIFIED

Questions?

24