australasian higher education evaluation forum (aheef) 2008 "evidence based decision making:...
TRANSCRIPT
Australasian Higher Education Evaluation Forum (AHEEF) 2008"Evidence based Decision Making: Scholarship and Practice"
2-3 October, 2008Australasian Higher Education Evaluation Forum (AHEEF)
2008"Evidence based Decision Making: Scholarship and Practice"
2-3 October, 2008
Students’ perceived motivation to learn:
consistency across units
Beatrice Tucker and Julie-Ann Pegden
eVALUate – unit survey
Quantitative items Ask students their level of agreement• What helps their achievement of the learning
outcomes (items 1-7)
• Their level of motivation & engagement (items 8-10)
• Overall satisfaction (item 11)
Qualitative items1. What are the most helpful aspects of the unit?
2. How might the unit be improved?
Motivation
8. I am motivated to achieve the learning outcomes in this unit. Being motivated means having the desire or drive to learn, to complete tasks and to willingly strive for goals.
Previous Research Findings
Higher % agreement motivation• *Females • *Part-time students• *International students• *Older students (26 yrs+)• *PG students• *External students• *Higher grades (SWA)• Health and Humanities vs Business and
especially * Science and Engineering.
Research questions
1. Are students consistent in their reported level of motivation across units?
2. If so – what are their characteristics?
3. What factors motivate them? – what do they say?
Method
Identified all student responses:– enrolled in 3 or more units– same reported agreement (motivation)
• SA = strongly agree • A = agree• D or SD = disagree or strongly disagree
– exclusions – UJ or blankQualitative comments analysed using SPSS
Text Analysis for Surveys
Results
eVALUate event – Semester 1, 2006
– 1,911 units
– response rate 28.9% by 32.7% students
– 25,090 surveys submitted by 8,379 students
Results
No students enrolled in 3+ units = 4983
Inconsistent agreement (motivation)
= 76.7% (n = 3822)
Consistent level of agreement (motivation)
• SA = 4.2% (n = 207)• A = 16.3% (n = 812)• D or SD = 1.0% (n = 52)
Demographics
Strongly agree
• Females 61%• Australian
students 69%
Disagree/strongly disagree
• Males 62%• Australian
students 73%
Faculty
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Humanities CBS Sc & Eng Health
No
. stu
den
ts
Strongly Agree Disagree
Year of program
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5
No
. stu
den
ts
Strongly Agree Disagree
Age (years)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
< 20 21-25 26-35 36-45 46+
No
. stu
den
ts
Strongly Agree Disagree
Grade average (percentage)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
< 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90+%
No
. stu
den
ts
Strongly Agree Disagree
What do students say – SA
What do students say – D / SD
D/SD students tracked
Semester / year
• Sem 2 2006 • Sem 1 2007 • Sem 2 2007
No. of students who were no longer enrolled
1022 (14 + 8 graduated)28 (16 +12 graduated)
24 still enrolled
ConclusionStudents who consistently SA tend to
be – female– studying in Health– 1st year– aged less than 25 years– achieve a grade average of 60 – 80%
Comment on – teachers and unit (learning experiences, assessments)
ConclusionStudents who consistently D/SD
– males – studying in Science and Engineering– 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year – aged less than 25 years– achieve a grade average of 80% or less
• Comment on – need more information and help, organisation, assessments
• Many of these students leave course.