authorizing quality team dana c. reed assistant superintendent
TRANSCRIPT
AUTHORIZING QUALITYTEAMDana C. Reed
Assistant Superintendent
AUTHORIZING QUALITY TEAM MEMBERS
Dana C. Reed – Assistant Superintendent William James – Director of Technology Services Zenobia “Z” Ealy – Assistant Director of Technology Kendall Stewart – Coordinator of Student Information Catherine Watt – Compliance Coordinator Bobby Rykard – Director of Performance Management
MISSION DRIVEN
Aligned with the mission of the SCPCSD Board of Trustees, the Authorizing Quality Division is focused on ensuring positive academic, fiscal, and organizational outcomes for all schools sponsored by the SCPCSD.
DATA DRIVEN
We strive to integrate and use data from a number of systems and processes to inform school communities and drive continuous improvement.
We aim to align the SCPCSD annual reporting, application review, compliance, charter amendment, data reporting, intervention, monitoring, and renewal processes with the Performance Framework.
CHARTER LIFE CYCLE
Application Review
Charter Approval
and Contract
Annual Review
Intervention (if
applicable)
Renewal Process Performanc
e Framework
SCPCSDPERFORMANCE FRAMEWORKBobby Rykard
Director of Performance Management
PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
The Performance Framework itself may be found at the following link:
https://sccharter-public.sharepoint.com/Documents/Accountability/Performance%20Framework/SCPCSD%20Performance%20Framework%20Rev%208-5-14.pdf
PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK
Developed to create shared standards between the district as authorizer and the schools to evaluate local level performance in the following areas:
Academic – Is the educational program successful?
Financial – Is the school financially viable/solvent?
Organizational – Is the organization effective and well run?
ACADEMIC Proficiency in ELA/Math
Advanced proficiency in ELA/Math
Student achievement – growth (beginning for 2016)
Performance in ELA/Math compared to resident district (b/m compared to b/m and virtual compared to virtual)
Graduation rate 4 year rate (required by ESEA) 5 year rate
Life Scholarship eligibility
Accountability Targets (suspended for 2015) State-Absolute and Growth Ratings Federal
Meeting targets as defined in the Charter
FINANCIAL Near-Term
Ability to cover current liabilities Adequate cash on hand Meet enrollment projections Meeting debt obligations
Long-Term Living within available resources (Margin) Reasonable proportion of assets financed Positive cash trend Covering long-term debt/avoiding default
ORGANIZATIONAL Educational Program
Access and Equity
Governance
School Environment
Students/Employees
Management/Oversight
Reporting
SAMPLESCHOOL PROFILE:
TIMELINE
The evaluation of the 2014 year was a pilot year
Much of the source input is received in the district in November
The goal is to send school evaluation reports to school leaders, the school board chair, and the SCPCSD Board by January 31st
