author's reply

1
tal setting is part of the protocol for all patients in hypovolemic shock. Since sudden deflation of the suit is strictly contraindicated, the proximal saphenous vein would not be available for cutdown. The pneuma- tic trouser suit does not cover the ankles. However, once the suit is inflated, IV transfusion may often be ex- tremely slow. For that reason lower extremity cut- downs should be avoided. In my article I mentioned increasing use of the pneumatic trouser suit as one reason emergency physicians must become familiar with upper extremity cutdowns. In conclusion, Dr. Nowak and Dr. Tomlanovich use a technique for lower extremity cutdown which, in their hands and in the proper situation, is simple, safe rapid and effective. However, in areas using the pneumatic trouser suit, physicians should concentrate on developing expertise with upper extremity cut- downs. This technique appears to be a reasonable alterna- tive to cutdown at the ankle in patients with exsan- guinating hemorrhage. Robert Knopp, MD Assistant Chief of Emergency Medicine Valley Medical Center Fresno, California Profesco Clarification Received To the Editor: The purpose of this letter is to clarify the issues evolving around the article on page 87, ~'ACEP En- dorsed Insurance Reviewed," in the April issue of JACEP. In our letter of January 4, 1979, addressed to George Podgorny, MD, ACEP President, we addressed the issues which caused Vigilant Insurance Company, not Profesco Corporation, to change its underwriting profiles. The JACEP article incorrectly attributed this decision to Profesco Corporation. Furthermore, Profesco Corporation historically established its independent agency representation with each insured who purchased coverage under the ACEP Endorsed Professional Liability Insurance Pro- gram. This' relationship was implemented through a "Letter of Understanding" between Profesco Corpora- tion and each insured. There never was a "le.tter of understanding with the College." In our "Letter of Understanding," between Agent and Insured, we spelled out certain agreements regarding membership in ACEP. There is no letter of understanding with the College. In response to objections raised by Dr. Podgorny and other ACEP officers, Profesco Corporation has agreed, as ACEP's Endorsed Agent, to accept applica- tions only from ACEP members. We are now taking the steps necessary to implement this commitment. We would appreciate your assistance in clarifying the factual inconsistencies in the article in question .... We respect and enjoy our relationship with ACEP, its officers and members, and we look forward_to en- joying a long-term and mutually profitable relation- ship. I. David Gordon Vice President, Profesco Corporation 8:6 (June) 1979 JACEP Mediocolegal Skull X-ray To the Editor: In the interesting case report by Wilson et al, '~Embedded Foreign Body in the Facial Bones" (7:444-447, 1978), a statement in the introduction was disturbing to me. The authors state that their case '~reinforces the fact that routine skull x-ray performed for 'mediocolegal' reasons is sometimes of great use." However, in their case there were at least two medical indications for skull x-ray. One was the al- tered mental status of the patient. The other was the presence of an intracranial foreign body that surely would have been discovered during proper exploration of the facial wound. I object to the phrase ~routine skull x-ray per- formed for 'medicolegal' reasons." Whether it be one, four or six views, I believe that we should strive to eliminate unnecessary routine x-rays, and perform them for medical, but not medicolegal, reasons. Lionel Edwards Weeks, MD Albany, New York Author's Reply Dr. Weeks' point is indeed well taken. Unfortu- nately, in this imperfect world, the altered mental status of the patient was ascribed more to his blood alcohol of 169mg/100 ml than to his head injury. Also, the Wound should indeed have been properly explored. However, the amount of projecting steel was minimal and the gap in the frontal bone was not at all obvious until the wound had been extended on formal explora- tion in the operating room. I quite understand that x-ray films for medicole- gal reasons are, in this cost-conscious world, some- thing which should be avoided if at all possible. Neal Wilson, MD Division of Plastic Surgery Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit, Michigan 1. Condon RE, Nyhus LM (eds): Manual of Surgical Therapeutics, ed 2. Boston, Little Brown & Co, 1972, p 144. Emergency Medical Care in China To the Editor: I recently had the opportunity to observe medical care in the Peoples Republic of China and would like to share this experience with your readers. Emergency medical care in China is not a high priority item. While China has made impressive strides in preventive medicine and basic health care, the medical system has not yet reached a level of sophistication where widespread development of or application of emergency medical technology can be justified. China has more immediate needs and programs on which to concentrate. Health care is available, free for all workers and peasants, and at a minimum cost for all family members. Personal and community hygiene is impressive. Disease prevention through immunization programs and elimination of disease vectors (carriers such as rats, snails, flies, mosquitoes) is an effective ongoing project. Almost all drinking water, for example, is first boiled. In a developing na- 246/69

Upload: neal-wilson

Post on 17-Sep-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Author's reply

tal se t t ing is pa r t of the protocol for all pa t ien ts in hypovolemic shock. Since sudden def la t ion of the sui t is s t r ic t ly con t ra ind ica ted , the p rox ima l saphenous vein would not be avai lab le for cutdown. The pneuma- tic t rouser sui t does not cover the ankles . However, once the sui t is inflated, IV t ransfusion may often be ex- t remely slow. For t ha t reason lower ex t r emi ty cut- downs should be avoided. In my ar t ic le I ment ioned increas ing use of the pneumat ic t rouser sui t as one reason emergency phys ic ians m u s t become fami l i a r with upper ex t r emi ty cutdowns.

In conclusion, Dr. Nowak and Dr. Tomlanovich use a technique for lower ex t remi ty cutdown which, in thei r hands and in the proper s i tuat ion, is simple, safe r a p i d and ef fec t ive . However , in a r e a s u s i n g the pneumat ic t rouser suit , physicians should concentra te on deve lop ing expe r t i s e wi th upper e x t r e m i t y cut- downs.

This technique appears to be a reasonable a l te rna- t ive to cutdown at the ankle in pa t ien ts wi th exsan- gu ina t ing hemorrhage.

Robert Knopp, MD Assistant Chief of Emergency Medicine

Valley Medical Center Fresno, California

Profesco Clarification Received

To the Editor:

The purpose of th is le t te r is to clarify the issues evolving around the art icle on page 87, ~'ACEP En- dorsed In su rance Reviewed," in t he A p r i l i ssue of JACEP.

In our l e t t e r of J a n u a r y 4, 1979, addressed to George Podgorny, MD, ACEP Pres ident , we addressed the issues which caused Vigi lan t Insurance Company, not Profesco Corporat ion, to change its underwr i t ing profiles. The JACEP art icle incorrect ly a t t r ibu ted this decision to Profesco Corporation.

F u r t h e r m o r e , Profesco Corpora t ion h i s t o r i c a l l y e s t a b l i s h e d i t s i n d e p e n d e n t agency r e p r e s e n t a t i o n wi th each insured who purchased coverage under the ACEP Endorsed Professional L iab i l i ty Insurance Pro- gram. This' re la t ionship was implemented th rough a "Let ter of Unders tanding" between Profesco Corpora- t ion and each insured. There never was a "le.tter of u n d e r s t a n d i n g wi th the College." In our "Le t t e r of U n d e r s t a n d i n g , " b e t w e e n A g e n t and I n s u r e d , we spelled out cer ta in agreements r ega rd ing membersh ip in ACEP. There is no le t ter of unde r s t and ing wi th the College.

In response to objections ra ised by Dr. Podgorny and o the r ACEP officers, Profesco Corpora t ion has agreed, as ACEP's Endorsed Agent, to accept applica- t ions only from ACEP members . We are now t ak ing the steps necessary to implement th is commitment .

We would apprecia te your ass is tance in c lar i fying the factual inconsistencies in the ar t ic le in quest ion . . . .

We respect and enjoy our re la t ionship wi th ACEP, i ts officers and members , and we look forward_to en- joying a long- term and mutua l ly profi table re la t ion- ship.

I. David Gordon Vice President, Profesco Corporation

8:6 (June) 1979 JACEP

Mediocolegal Skull X-ray To the Editor:

In the i n t e r e s t i ng case repor t by Wilson et al, ' ~Embedded F o r e i g n Body in t h e F a c i a l B o n e s " (7:444-447, 1978), a s t a t emen t in the introduct ion was d is turb ing to me. The authors s ta te tha t the i r case '~reinforces the fact t ha t rout ine skul l x-ray performed for 'mediocolegal ' reasons is somet imes of great use."

However, in the i r case there were at leas t two medical indicat ions for skul l x-ray. One was the al- tered men ta l s ta tus of the pat ient . The other was the presence of an i n t r a c r a n i a l foreign body tha t sure ly would have been discovered dur ing proper explorat ion of the facial wound.

I object to the phrase ~routine skul l x- ray per- formed for 'medicolegal ' reasons." Whether i t be one, four or six views, I bel ieve tha t we should s t r ive to e l imina te unneces sa ry rou t ine x-rays, and per form them for medical , but not medicolegal , reasons.

Lionel Edwards Weeks, MD Albany, New York

Author's Reply Dr. Weeks ' point is indeed well taken. Unfortu-

nate ly , in th is imperfec t world, the a l te red m e n t a l s ta tus of the pa t i en t was ascr ibed more to his blood alcohol of 169mg/100 ml t h a n to his head injury. Also, the Wound should indeed have been properly explored. However, the amoun t of project ing steel was min ima l and the gap in the f rontal bone was not at al l obvious unt i l the wound had been ex tended on formal explora- t ion in the opera t ing room.

I quite under s t and t ha t x-ray films for medicole- gal reasons are, in th is cost-conscious world, some- th ing which should be avoided if at all possible.

Neal Wilson, MD Division of Plastic Surgery

Wayne State University School of Medicine

Detroit, Michigan

1. Condon RE, Nyhus LM (eds): Manual of Surgical Therapeutics, ed 2. Boston, Little Brown & Co, 1972, p 144.

Emergency Medical Care in China To the Editor:

I recent ly had the oppor tun i ty to observe medical care in the Peoples Republic of China and would l ike to share th is experience wi th your readers.

Emergency medical care in China is not a high p r i o r i t y i t em. W h i l e C h i n a has made i m p r e s s i v e s tr ides in prevent ive medic ine and basic hea l t h care, the medica l sy s t em has not ye t reached a level of sophis t ica t ion where widesp read deve lopment of or appl icat ion of emergency medical technology can be just if ied.

China has more immed ia t e needs and programs on which to concentrate . Hea l th care is avai lable , free for all workers and peasants , and at a m in i mum cost for a l l f a m i l y m e m b e r s . P e r s o n a l and c o m m u n i t y hygiene is impress ive . Disease p reven t ion t h r o u g h immun iz a t i on p rog rams and e l imina t ion of d isease vectors (carr iers such as rats , snails , flies, mosquitoes) is an effective ongoing project. Almost a l l d r i n k i n g water , for example , is f i rs t boiled. In a developing na-

246/69