aviation safety performance: can it be measured? corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration...
TRANSCRIPT
Aviation Safety Performance: Can it be measured?
Corrective actions and how to avoid the frustration of Sisyphus
5th FSF Conference Nicosia, Cyprus May 15-16, 2014
ADRIAN CIORANUDirector General
What – Why – When – How
Safety Indicators
Focus: ICAO Annex 14
Economic development
Status quo
Solutions
Safety indicators: High levelQuantitative or qualitative, leading (proactive) or lagging (reactive)
Accidents/serious incidentsStatistics regard commercial ops, aircraft MTOW >2’250kg
Global safety reporting culture (ICAO ADREP)
ICAO USOAP: SARPs implementation
Effective State oversight capability
Source: ICAO, STA10, SKYbrary
ICAO Annex 14 & National Regulations
Accidents: Airports
21% Deficiencies in regulatory oversight
23% Threats related to airport facilities:
Contaminated runways/taxiways: 79%
Inadequate RESA: 7%
Poor signage, faint markings: 7%
Airport perimeter control/fencing: 7%Source: IATA, Safety Report 2012
Source: ICAO State of Global Aviation Safety 2013
Source: ACI Economics Report 2013
Economic development
AiMS Swiss company
International team of experts
Leverage strengths & core activity
Foster technical cooperation
Avoid duplication, unnecessary competition
Innovative solutions
Tangible results
Solutions and profit for States & AirportsCost clarity and cost savings
Simplify oversight
Evaluate compliance (CMA)
Manage corrective/preventive actions
Track progress
Optimize resources
Enable technical cooperation
Increase safety & manage costs
Measure. Correct. Monitor. Achieve.
AiMS.
www.aimsolutions.ch
© Copyright AiMS 2014