b. de solan , a.d. lesergent , d. gouache arvalis – institut du végétal

16
Current use and potential of satellite imagery for crop production management The vision of ARVALIS after 10 years of experience B. de Solan, A.D. Lesergent, D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Upload: jola

Post on 25-Feb-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Current use and potential of satellite imagery for crop production management The vision of ARVALIS after 10 years of experience. B. de Solan , A.D. Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal. ARVALIS presentation. ARVALIS: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Current use and potential of satellite imagery for crop production management

The vision of ARVALIS after 10 years of experience

B. de Solan, A.D. Lesergent, D. GouacheARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Page 2: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

ARVALIS presentation

• ARVALIS: – a French applied research institute funded and run by farmers– on cereals, maize, pulses, potatoes and forage crops– in the field of: production, storage, preservation, first process (food and non food

uses)

• Provide advices for cropping practices– Evaluation of new varieties– Test new cropping practices– Develop decision support tools

• Objective: to maintain a high level of production in a better way– Services to farmers, agricultural organizations and firms from the various chains, – using environment-friendly cropping systems.

Page 3: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Increasing needs in observation data to optimize crop production

• Environmental constraints are increasing– Goal: a reduction of 50% of treatments within 2008 - 2018– A better water management

• A need to keep production at a high level of quantity and quality– Increasing needs for food– New uses of agro products (bio fuel, bio materials)– Strict rules on products’ quality (mycotoxins)

• A fast evolution of agricultural products prices: requires a better harvest forecast

Page 4: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Decision support tools: requirements

- Which crop ?

- Which variety?

- Amount and timing of nitrogen application?

- Irrigation?

- Herbicide, pesticide application?

- …

Economic context

+

Environmental Rules

+

Technical references

+

Agronomic models (DST)

Service providerThe farmer has to take decisions

Field trials

Law

Farmer’s field observations

- Soil- Climate- Vegetation

Asks InformationNeeds

Farmer’s field observations

- Soil- Climate- Vegetation

Grain marketStrategic decisions

Tactical decisions

Page 5: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Existing DST in FranceThe case of nitrogen management

• 3 kinds of vegetation based tools are used:- Leaf scale tools (HNTester ® = SPAD)- Tractor borne sensors (Yara Nsensor®, GreenSeeker®, CropCircle®, …)- Satellite imagery (Farmstar, …)

• 15 - 20 % of crop lands are managed with a DST for nitrogen applications

Too low !

• Due to lack of observations availability (spatially and temporally) and cost of products

• Use of satellite observation has strong interests for a large development of DST:- No investment / tractor borne sensors- Control possible on calculation process (centralized processing)- Monitoring interesting at different scales (farmer but also cooperatives, traders)- The spatial resolution fits well application requirements (10 m)

Page 6: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

From satellite to the farmer : a long way!

Satellite products processing :LAIChlorophyll content

Farmer wants application maps:Time of application (phenology) <- Meteorological dataNitrogen amount <- vegetation observation data

Typical nitrogen recommendation based on:- Yield potential- Total biomass at given development stages- Total nitrogen uptake at given development stages

Building semi empirical relationships:- Biomass = f(LAI, phenology, cultivar)- Total nitrogen uptake = f(Chlorophyll, cultivar)

Page 7: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Support tools provided by FARMSTAR

Sept Oct Nov Avril Mai Juin JuilletDec MarsFevJanv

Updated yield potential

Growing situation

Lodging risk assessment

Season summary

Previsional total amount of N

Last dressing application

Input managementState of the crop

Page 8: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Contracted areas

620.000 ha

Satellite acquisitons :

61 SPOT HRV images

15 Formosat images

Geographic cover of Farmstar 2012

Page 9: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

A strong field technical support

11540 Farmers25 Coops620 000 ha contracted

Wheat : 340 000 ha Barley : 60 000 ha Colza : 220 000 ha

730 technicians13 Engineers

2012

Page 10: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Delivered information• Application map + phenology

• Compatible with sprayers for VRA

2Modulation des doses d’azote

FarmstarLe conseil de l’apport tardif

Fichier Farmstar

Boîtier de gestion du GPS + carte de préco

AgrotronixJDRDS…

Carte PCMCIA

Boîtier de gestion de l’épandeur

KuhnSulkyAmazone

LH 5000

stations deréférence terrestres

Satellite de communication

GPS

dGPS

Page 11: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Present limitations

• Lack of dynamic data

• Need of an important parameterization to match satellite information and agronomic variables

• Need of airborne flights for Chl content estimation

Page 12: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Phenotyping: an opportunity for a better integration of sensors observations in the farmer practices

• Need for a better match between sensors observations and agronomic references and tools:

- More ground based acquisition to develop new DST based on reflectances or Vegetation indices- High quality of satellite data to match these ground measurements

• Possible through phenotyping applications:- Used for cultivar selection- Usable to bridge the gap between satellite images and application

Page 13: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Recommandationsfor Sentinel-2 exploitation for agricultural monitoring

Reflectances Top of Canopy

Sentinel 2 satellite

Farmer

Satellite data pre-processing:- Geometric corrections- Atmospheric corrections

Ground based researches:- Biophysical variables retrieval

specific of a crop/variety• Design new DST using sensor

based

Data management:- Storage- Computation- Delivery

Application map

Field control:- Connection with farmers- Field validation measurements

Page 14: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

RecommandationsTechnical aspects

• Resolution: 10 m ok for major annual crops (wheat, maize, …)

• 1-2 acquisitions / week during fast growing periods• Dynamics characterization

• Spectral configuration• Red edge bands for chlorophyll estimation

• High quality of pre processing: – Geometric correction (ortho rectified)– Atmospheric corrections -> Reflectance TOC is important !– Clouds mask– BRDF corrections

Page 15: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

RecommandationsOperational aspects

• Service continuity insurance for services development: 20 years is perfect!

• Fast delivery: 3 days between acquisition and delivery– 1 day for raw data access

• Free access for a larger diffusion and new services development

• Many new products can be designed, not proposed due to costs:– irrigation– services for crops with small area – intermediate crops nitrogen catchment, …

• Will put satellite imagery as the key observation way for crops management

Page 16: B. de  Solan , A.D.  Lesergent , D. Gouache ARVALIS – Institut du végétal

Research needs

• Demonstrate that satellite reflectances are comparable with ground based reflectances measurements

• Demonstrate how to optimize the use of multispectral reflectances data in DST to reduce field parameterization effort– E.g. : Link between Chl content and Nitrogen content

• Demonstrate how a better dynamics characterization allows a better crop management