babyuniverses.pdf

8/14/2019 BabyUniverses.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/babyuniversespdf 1/5

A Rhetorical Analysis of Stephen Hawking's "Black

Holes and Baby Universes"

Melissa AveryOctober 13, 2003



In "Black Holes and Baby Universes", Stephen Hawking introduces the

concept of "baby universes". These are self-contained universes that branch off from

our region of the universe. Objects that fall into black holes would enter baby

universes, only to emerge as a steady stream of particles from another black hole of

the same mass. "Black Holes and Baby Universes" was originally a lecture given at

the University of California, Berkeley, in 1988. Hawking uses the particular analogy

of space travel, combined with the effect of his diction, to draw in listeners and

readers and to emphasize the often highly theoretical nature of science and its

relation to science fiction.

Hawking's continued reference to the effects of black holes and baby

universes on futuristic space travel serves to make the subject matter much more

accessible to non-astrophysicists.

This sounds like just what is required to allow space

travel though black holes. You just steer your spaceship

into a suitable black hole. […] You would then hope to

reappear out of some other hole, though you wouldn't

be able to choose where. (121)

This paragraph primarily serves to simplify ideas such as, "This baby universe

may join on again, [appearing] to us to be another black hole that formed and then

evaporated. Particles that fell into one black hole would appear as particles emitted

by the other black hole" (121). To make the jump of logic from rejoining baby

universes and a "black hole that formed and evaporated" (121) to the emitting of

particles from neighboring black holes could be difficult for readers to make

automatically on anything other than faith, as there are details missing in Hawking's

explanation, as is necessary in a non-technical essay. It would be unreasonable for

Hawking to launch into mathematical details that demonstrate precisely how likely it

is for a baby universe to form and reconnect as a neighboring black hole of equal

mass, were he even to have such numbers. This issue with the missed details is

particularly relevant in the original context of the essay, that of a lecture, in which

Hawking must keep the attention span of the audience by ensuring that they

understand the basic concepts each step of the way, while not bogging them down

with mathematics. Yet, by keeping with his analogy, he not only keeps the reader

from becoming hopelessly confused with trying to untangle the possibility of his

"technical" explanation being true, but effectively glosses over the missing

information in his explanation by distracting the audience.



As seen in the example of the analogy above, Hawking also keeps the tone of

the essay light, again serving to keep the audience interested, but with the added

effect of being much more convincing. Had Hawking preached to his audience on

how his theories are correct and everyone else's are wrong, he would have alienated

much of his audience. By leaving that idea quietly implicit in the presentation of his

ideas in a popular lecture, which is certainly more likely to affect the beliefs of the

public than a closed audience of astrophysicists, Hawking loses no followers and does

not create an image of a scientist desperate to get his ideas out and heard. Whether

he is or not is more likely to be a matter of discussion within the scientific

community than the public-at-large.

Couching his jokes in familiar, science fiction terms serves to lightly and

humorously play upon stereotypes of people who would attend an astrophysics

lecture or read a popularized astrophysics essay. When relating more technical

information, as shown in the example above concerning the rejoining of baby

universes with our own, he does not bore the reader with technical terms or

mathematics that would be above the level of a high school graduate or college

undergraduate student, and he rather quickly returns to the popular analogy of the

space traveler. Even his "technical" term of a "baby universe" does not strike the

reader as being overly scientific, and, thus as not being scary. In fact, some might

find the term silly, further serving to draw the reader in by leaving them curious as

to how the usage of the term will be justified scientifically, or as "scientific" as the

essay becomes.

Hawking's use of the space travel analogy also demonstrates the link he sees

between astrophysics and science fiction. He is quite aware, as are his readers and

listeners, of the fact that much of popular science fiction takes basic physics ideas

and stretches them, often to the breaking point, for the sake of entertainment or

exploring possible futures of humanity. Despite the tenuousness of the link between

current, existing astrophysics theories and the extremes they are carried to in

science fiction, there is an important link in Hawking's mind. His presentation of the

space traveler analogy is not to disregard the idea as frivolous and ridiculous to evenconsider, but almost to suggest methods of keeping science fiction within our current

realm of "realistic" ideas about the universe, while still being entertaining. "You just

steer your spaceship into a suitable black hole. It had better be a pretty big one,

though, or the gravitational forces will tear you into spaghetti before you get inside"

(121) and "In real time, an astronaut who fell into a black hole would come to a



sticky end. He would be torn apart by the difference between the gravitation force

on his head and his feet. Even the particles that made up his body would not

survive" (121-2) prove this: his suggested "modifications" would almost make funny

science fiction short stories themselves!

While reinforcing the fun nature of the connection between science fiction and

the reality of astrophysics, however, Hawking subtly emphasizes both the distance

between the two and the closeness of the two. It is truly unknown if Hawking's ideas

will have any real bearing on future space travel. Nothing about his astrophysical

theories are testable in a personal sense (as in, via space travel) with our current

level of technology, and will most likely not be for quite some time. Thus, anything

in science fiction that bases itself on his theories and ideas is speculative at best;

this is not particularly surprising, as that tends to be the nature of science fiction.

What is interesting, however, is the idea that while astrophysics is a science founded

on observation and mathematics, Hawking, in his manner of delivery, makes it seem

almost as subjective as science fiction in some aspects, thus bringing the two fields

closer together in the minds of his readers and listeners. "In 1973 I started

investigating what difference the uncertainty principle would make to black holes. To

my great surprise and that of everyone else, I found it meant that black holes are

not completely black" (120). Here, Hawking makes the discovery of the emission of

radiation by black holes seem like something less than the scientific method and

more like intuition; to Hawking, science is not merely an objective exercise in the

Scientific Method, but something that can surprise and startle. This is further

evidenced by Hawking's rather sociable tone and diction—the subjects of science

fiction (and space travel) and astrophysics are both fascinating and interesting to

Hawking. "What all this means is that going through a black hole is unlikely to prove

a popular and reliable method of space travel. First of all, you would have to get

there by traveling in imaginary time […]. Second, you couldn't really choose your

destination" (122).

Hawking's use of a particular, popular analogy and a light, sociable tone serve

to keep his audience interested in his subject matter to express his feelings on thenature of his particular branch of science. Hawking has once again managed a

"successful" essay—easy for the non-astrophysicist to understand at a basic level,

successful in getting his ideas propagated to those even remotely interested in

astrophysics, and highly theoretical and experimentally unproven in subject matter.

Word Count: 1317



Bibliography

Hawking, Stephen. "Black Holes and Baby Universes". Black Holes and Baby

Universes. New York: Bantam Books, 1993. 115-125.

babyuniverses.pdf

Documents