badri younes dod director, spectrum management 17 may 2006 spectrum transformation: acceleration

18
Badri Younes DoD Director, Spectrum Management 17 May 2006 Spectrum Transformation: Acceleration

Upload: arabella-norris

Post on 17-Dec-2015

234 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Badri YounesDoD Director, Spectrum Management

17 May 2006

Spectrum Transformation: Acceleration

2

The Operational EnvironmentNet-Centric Warfare Vision: Information Anywhere, Anytime

Assured Communications Anywhere in the World Without Fixed Infrastructure and Zero Set-up Time – Requires Spectrum!!!

Assured Communications Anywhere in the World Without Fixed Infrastructure and Zero Set-up Time – Requires Spectrum!!!

3

100 kHz

10 MHz

20MHz

30 MHz

40 MHz

50MHz

60MHz

70 MHz

80MHz

90MHz

MEDEVACUAV/UGV

Battlefield Sensor

Navigation AidsUAV

UGVUAV

ATC EOD

Tactical HF Tactical FM/SINCGARS

MSRT

Ship-Shore-Ship Link 11

Over-the-Horizon Radar

Perimeter Detection

Security Sensor

UAV

IntruderDetection Radar

Beacons

Position Location

JTRS Clusters Implementation

Security

MEDEVAC

ATC, REMBASS, Battlefield SensorsEmergency

Locator, Rescue

Radar,

MW Landing

TACAN

100 MHz

200 MHz

300 MHz

400 MHz

500 MHz

600 MHz

700 MHz

800 MHz

900 MHz

1000 MHz

Tactical UHF (Ter/SAT) EPLRS Tactical MW

UAV

RF TagsVIICS

Wireless Comm, BattlegroupCellular

JTIDSUHF, AM

UGV D/L, Sonobuoy

MSE/HAVEQUICK

Flight Deck Soldier Intercom UAV

Control, Sonobuoy

Search Radar

Radar

Intrusion Detection

Tac VHF

JTRS Clusters Implementation

Tactical PCS

TACANL2, L4/L3, L1

MSE, Tactical WB, Precision Munitions,

UAV, UGV

2 GHz

3GHz

4 GHz

5 GHz

6 GHz

21 GHz

30 GHz

40 GHz

1 GHz

Tropo

Fire Control/Tracking Radar,

MW SensorDSCS

TerrainRadar

Surveillance,Fire Control Radar

EHF Radio,BCIS

Acquisition/Surveillance/ATC Radar/INMARSAT/

IRIDIUM/ICIDSSurveillance/Search/

FC Radar

UAV

MW Landing

Challenge Athena, INMARSAT

MW,Sensor

CDL, TCDL,SCDL, WB DLs

Data Link MILSTAR,GBS

GBS

Search, Fire Control Radar

UAV

IFF,GPS L5

Intrusion Detection

JTRS Clusters Implementation

GPS

UGV,Missile DL

Soldier Radio,Wireless LAN

100 kHz

10 MHz

20MHz

30 MHz

40 MHz

50MHz

60MHz

70 MHz

80MHz

90MHz

MEDEVACUAV/UGV

Battlefield Sensor

Navigation AidsUAV

UGVUAV

ATC EOD

Tactical HF Tactical FM/SINCGARS

MSRT

Ship-Shore-Ship Link 11

Over-the-Horizon Radar

Perimeter Detection

Security Sensor

UAV

IntruderDetection Radar

Beacons

Position Location

JTRS Clusters Implementation

Security

MEDEVAC

ATC, REMBASS, Battlefield SensorsEmergency

Locator, Rescue

Radar,

MW Landing

TACAN

100 MHz

200 MHz

300 MHz

400 MHz

500 MHz

600 MHz

700 MHz

800 MHz

900 MHz

1000 MHz

Tactical UHF (Ter/SAT) EPLRS Tactical MW

UAV

RF TagsVIICS

Wireless Comm, BattlegroupCellular

JTIDSUHF, AM

UGV D/L, Sonobuoy

MSE/HAVEQUICK

Flight Deck Soldier Intercom UAV

Control, Sonobuoy

Search Radar

Radar

Intrusion Detection

Tac VHF

JTRS Clusters Implementation

Tactical PCSSecurity

MEDEVAC

ATC, REMBASS, Battlefield SensorsEmergency

Locator, Rescue

Radar,

MW Landing

TACAN

100 MHz

200 MHz

300 MHz

400 MHz

500 MHz

600 MHz

700 MHz

800 MHz

900 MHz

1000 MHz

100 MHz

200 MHz

300 MHz

400 MHz

500 MHz

600 MHz

700 MHz

800 MHz

900 MHz

1000 MHz

Tactical UHF (Ter/SAT) EPLRS Tactical MW

UAV

RF TagsVIICS

Wireless Comm, BattlegroupCellular

JTIDSUHF, AM

UGV D/L, Sonobuoy

MSE/HAVEQUICK

Flight Deck Soldier Intercom UAV

Control, Sonobuoy

Search Radar

Radar

Intrusion Detection

Tac VHF

JTRS Clusters Implementation

Tactical PCS

TACANL2, L4/L3, L1

MSE, Tactical WB, Precision Munitions,

UAV, UGV

2 GHz

3GHz

4 GHz

5 GHz

6 GHz

21 GHz

30 GHz

40 GHz

1 GHz

2 GHz

3GHz

4 GHz

5 GHz

6 GHz

21 GHz

30 GHz

40 GHz

1 GHz

Tropo

Fire Control/Tracking Radar,

MW SensorDSCS

TerrainRadar

Surveillance,Fire Control Radar

EHF Radio,BCIS

Acquisition/Surveillance/ATC Radar/INMARSAT/

IRIDIUM/ICIDSSurveillance/Search/

FC Radar

UAV

MW Landing

Challenge Athena, INMARSAT

MW,Sensor

CDL, TCDL,SCDL, WB DLs

Data Link MILSTAR,GBS

GBS

Search, Fire Control Radar

UAV

IFF,GPS L5

Intrusion Detection

JTRS Clusters Implementation

GPS

UGV,Missile DL

Soldier Radio,Wireless LAN

DoD’s Growing Spectrum Requirements Warfighter Spectrum Use Below 40 GHz

4

• Instrumental in the new DSO and in implementing the President’s Initiative: The Defense Spectrum Management Architecture (DSMA), the Department’s enterprise architecture for Spectrum Management, will be developed:– To address how the Department manages and uses

the electromagnetic Spectrum today and in the future in order to ensure continued DOD access to required spectrum.

– The DSMA will include a robust, common set of architecture products which will provide decision makers and their supporting staff with operational, systems and technical elements involved with conducting spectrum management for net-centric operations.

KEY FRAMEWORK:DSMA

5

As - Is

Net-centric SM(To-Be)

• Multiple versions to be developed– V1.0

• As-Is (2006) (Full Set of Artifacts)

– To-Be (Objective)• Select Artifacts will describe To-Be

Increments

• Timeframes: 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020

• 2002 - - As described in the DoD Net-centric Spectrum Management Strategy

• DSMA provides a common view for defining SM Transformation

– Transition Strategy will define SM migration stages – desired capabilities

– SM Roadmap will guide implementation through each stage

• Policy

• Processes

• Systems/Tools

Defense Spectrum Management Architecture “The Blueprint for DoD’s SM Transformation”

6

Spectrum Management ProcessRequired Evolution

• Long Setup Times:– Engineering for thousands of assignments– Extensive Host Nation (HN) coordination

• Tactical Planning: Extensive and cumbersome for each engagement, contingency, and AOR

• Spectrum Inflexibility: Static assignments dictate paucity in dynamic, RF rich environments

• Spectrum Scarcity: Throughput limitations due to spectrum bandwidth constraints

• Sub-Optimization: Future potential net-centricity restricted by existing practices

• Near-Zero Setup Time:– Configure system operating parameters

via software– Standards approach will enable pre-

coordinated HN agreements

• Adaptive Tactical Planning: Automated adaptation to regional, local, and tactical policies

• Dynamic Spectrum Management: Provides assured access to and efficient utilization of spectrum

• Spectrum Utilization Optimized: Spectrum Bandwidth-on-demand

• Spectrum enables Net-Centricity:– Spectrum no longer a constraining factor– Minimizes Spectrum “Fratricide”

TodayTodayTodayToday Future Goals (2015)Future Goals (2015)Future Goals (2015)Future Goals (2015)

“Instrument” the Network to Assure Spectrum Access“Instrument” the Network to Assure Spectrum Access

7

Self-Syncing Spectrum Use

Vision for TransformingSpectrum Management

DS3

SpectrumXXI

SpectrumM&S

GIG

EnterpriseServices

Standard Data StructureWeb-based/Automated SM Processes

Predictive Planning

JTRS

WIN-T

NetForce

Common Spectrum Information Resources/Environment

Deliberate/Deployment/Operational Planning

5

6

4

Shared Information Environment

SpectrumSituationalAwareness

Adaptive Spectrum Control

Improved Spectrum Efficiency

Bandwidth on Demand

Sense & Adjust

Cognitive Spectrum

Use

1 2 3

Red Force Commercial

Blue Force

Near-Term - 2010

Mid-Term - 2015Far-Term - 2020

8

REORGANIZATION: 2006

DoD transformation in spectrum management:

• The Defense Spectrum Office (strategic planning) and the Joint Spectrum Center (engineering) will merge in mid-year to form the new DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION

• This new DSO will combine both previous entities’ core competencies into a one-stop shop for enabling Net-Centric strategy within the spectrum management community.

+

                                                     

=…Power to the Edge for the Warfighter!

9

AFFMA

MCEB

FrequencyPanel

Unified &Specified

Commands

Joint FrequencyManagement

Office

Technical Support Technical Support

Service Unique

Joint

Spectrum*

ManagementDirectorate

NMSCASMO

JSC

DSO

Joint Staff DASD(S2)

ASD(NII) Inter-Agency Coordination

Inter-Agency Coordination

DoD Representation

Inter-Agency Coordination

MilSec

Changes in DoD Spectrum Management “Coordination Channels”

OSM

IRAC

DEFENSE

SPECTRUM

ORGANIZATION

MERGING MAY 2006

MERGING MAY 2006

10

DoD Strategic Spectrum Plan(30 November 2005)

DoD Strategic Spectrum Plan Submitted to the Department of Commerce

(In Response to The Presidential Spectrum Policy Reform Initiative)

Key Conclusions:

• Spectrum requirements growth will be significant through 2015 and beyond

• DoD’s most significant spectrum requirements growth will occur in the spectrum bands below 3 GHz

• While bands above 3 GHz are not as densely occupied as the lower bands today, they are critical to future DoD systems and growth is expected here as well

• Any loss of spectrum access to DoD, either nationally or internationally, through reallocation or other means will exacerbate DoD’s challenge to meet future spectrum requirements

11

KEY THEMES FOR 2006-2007 (1)International

• The World Radio Conference (WRC) – A Global Forum, Held Every Two to Five Years, to Update/Modify the International Radio Regulations, which form the Basis on Which Individual Countries and Regions Develop Their Own Radio Regulations. The Ability of Our Forces to Gain Access to Spectrum Globally is Dependent On Radio Regulations of the Countries in Which We Operate!

•DoD’s goals with respect to WRC-07:•Prior to the Conference, to INFORM

•US Spectrum Decision Makers Need to Understand Future Impact on Military Operations •Changes in Radio Regulations will Heavily Influence Acquisition and Operational Decisions

•During the Conference, to INFLUENCE•Negotiate Modifications to the Radio Regulations to Maximize U.S. Military Access to Spectrum •Develop Close Relationships With Military and Civilian Spectrum Managers in Other Administrations

12

KEY THEMES FOR 2006-2007 (2)International

• DoD Actively Engaged in all US and Regional Preparatory Activities for WRC-07

• DoD Priority Focus on certain WRC-07 Agenda Items, including

• IMT-2000 Frequency Allocations

• Additional Allocations to Civil Aeronautical Mobile

• Satellite Network Coordination Procedures

• MF & HF Band Review

13

KEY THEMES FOR 2006-2007 (3)Emerging Spectrum Technologies

• Initiative: Spectrum Scorecards– Purpose: To develop a system engineering

methodology to promote consideration of spectrum efficiency, effectiveness, and supportability

– Key Objectives:• To provide a spectrum efficiency and effectiveness

trade-off analysis methodology for program managers.• To meet policy and regulatory challenges of spectrum

valuation, efficiency, and effectiveness.

14

KEY THEMES FOR 2006-2007 (4)Emerging Spectrum Technologies

• Initiative: Spectrum Test Beds– Purpose: To establish wireless and spectrum testbed

capabilities to assess and measure performance of spectrum access methods, systems, and components in a networked environment.

– Key Objectives:• To evaluate emerging technologies under realistic scenarios to

provide foundation for new policy and doctrine for future wireless systems and spectrum access.

• To address bandwidth limitation of dense wireless networks and the relationships and dependencies between emerging wireless operational concepts and emerging spectrum management approaches.

• To develop foundation for operational management of wireless network devices to support dynamic spectrum operations and realization of bandwidth-on-demand.

15

Spectrum Testbed Initiative Objective & Goals

• Evaluate emerging technologies under realistic scenarios• To identify and mitigate spectrum-related issues • To provide foundation for new policy and doctrine for future

spectrum access and management

• Assess the relationships and dependencies between emerging DoD operational concepts and emerging spectrum management approaches

• Monitor Advances So New Capabilities Are Integrated Into Operations Without Delay

• Develop Partnerships Between Industry and Government

To promote wireless and spectrum testbed initiatives that provide simulation and hardware facilities to assess and

measure performance of innovative spectrum access methods, systems, and components

16

KEY THEMES FOR 2006-2007 (5)National

• The President’s Spectrum Initiative: Current economic analysis reflects a view of defense-use spectrum as merely a commercial commodity, and overwhelmingly reflects a narrow “property rights” view of spectrum usage – as the Initiative moves towards concrete policy prescriptions this year, industry and the academy must be made aware of

• the impact on taxpayers

• on U.S. payments for access to spectrum overseas

• the impact of loss of military budget assets to pay for existing and future spectrum needs for military defense; and

• potential economic losses from the consequences of eroded defense capabilities.

17

SPECTRUM POLICY FOR THE 21st CENTURY – The

Implementation Plan to Carryout the President’s

Spectrum Policy Initiative and Direction

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEDONALD L. EVANS, SECRETARY

MICHAEL D. GALLAGHER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY

FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATIONMAY 2005

Report 1: Federal

Report 2: State, Local, Private

9 Recommendations

15 Recommendations

June 2004 30 Nov 2004

President’s Memorandum

May 2005

Implementation Plan

Directed Implementation of All 24 Recommendations

Plus Additional Tasks

• OMB Proposals expected by year-end 2006• May include incentive pricing

After the I-Plan, the Real Work Begins

President’s Spectrum Policy InitiativeBackground on Implementation Plan

18

Key Points

• DoD Network-Centric Operations Requires Assured Seamless and Autonomous Spectrum Access

• New technologies are fundamental to resolving future spectrum shortfalls

• DoD Spectrum Management community participating in various adaptive spectrum access programs to ensure parallel technology/policy development

Making Spectrum AccessTransparent to the Users