baja 2013 final year project report

49
A Final Design Report on Design & Fabrication of an ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE” Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY in MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Submitted by: KALYAN POTUKUCHI (11091007) KANISHK RAJ (11091008) KUNTAL BASU (11091014) Under the supervision of PROF. N. K. BATRA ER. VISHAL GUPTA DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING M. M. ENGINEERING COLLEGE MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY, MULLANA, AMBALA, HARYANA. May 2013

Upload: kalyan-potukuchi

Post on 16-Apr-2017

2.043 views

Category:

Documents


20 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BAJA 2013 final year project report

A

Final Design Report

on

“Design & Fabrication of an ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE”

Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY

in

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Submitted by:

KALYAN POTUKUCHI (11091007)

KANISHK RAJ (11091008)

KUNTAL BASU (11091014)

Under the supervision of

PROF. N. K. BATRA

ER. VISHAL GUPTA

DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

M. M. ENGINEERING COLLEGE

MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY,

MULLANA, AMBALA, HARYANA.

May 2013

Page 2: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ ii ~

CERTIFICATE FROM GUIDE

This is to certify that the project “Design and Fabrication of an All Terrain

Vehicle” by KALYAN POTUKUCHI (11091007), KANISHK RAJ (11091008),

KUNTAL BASU (11091014), VIVEK SHARMA (11092366), ADITYA SAINI

(11092459), NITISH BENJWAL (11092484), HARPREET SINGH (11092375),

GURINDER SINGH (11090971), TALWINDER SINGH (11092390) is a bonafide

work that has been carried out under my guidance, for partial fulfilment of the

requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Technology in

Mechanical Engineering by Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana.

Prof. N. K. Batra

Project Guide

Page 3: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ iii ~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This is a heartfelt expression of indebtedness and gratitude to all those who are helping us to

successfully complete this project. It has been a very pleasurable learning experience where

we could put our theoretical knowledge to practical use and have learned a lot by working

hands-on, together in a team.

Foremost we are extremely grateful to Prof. N. K. Batra, Professor & Head, Mechanical

Engineering Department, MMEC and Er. Vishal Gupta, Asst. Prof., Mechanical engineering

Department, MMEC. Their never ending support and benevolent cooperation was a guiding

force to us. Their encouragement and valuable suggestions provided us the enthusiasm to

work harder in completing the project.

We thank the Society of Automotive Engineers for the concept of Mini BAJA, and for their

numerous publications based on which we have decided our design parameters. We also

salute the warm affection of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the Mechanical

Engineering Department of M. M. Engineering College, Mullana.

Last but not the least we thank the Almighty without whose countless blessing nothing is

complete.

Looking forward to further cooperation from all concerned,

KALYAN POTUKUCHI (11091007)

KANISHK RAJ (11091008)

KUNTAL BASU (11091014)

Page 4: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ iv ~

PREFACE

This report presents a detailed objective summary of the process and parameters used

for designing and fabricating our project — an ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE.

The report is divided into several headings corresponding to the departments divided

for the purpose of executing the project, like Frame, Suspension, Braking, Steering and so on.

It describes a detail of the methodology adopted, the comparison of different parameters, etc.

Reasons for selecting the final specifications have been elaborated at every stage. The

combination of figures, graphs and detailed explanation will surely make it interesting in

reading the report. However, detailed calculations have not been added to avoid making the

report voluminous. Formulas and mathematical relations have been stated, where applicable.

Reports like Bill of Material and Cost Report have been summarized under broad heads.

All figures mentioned here have been referred to from publications and standards of

different professional societies like Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Society of

Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), Automotive Research Association of India

(ARAI), etc.

The figures shown here were either captured while fabrication work was being carried

out or generated from software. They are copies of original work.

Although, the report gives an exhaustive account of the project progress, any

omissions or mistakes noted are deeply regretted.

All figures mentioned here are authentic and true to the best of our knowledge.

KALYAN POTUKUCHI (11091007)

KANISHK RAJ (11091008)

KUNTAL BASU (11091014)

Page 5: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ v ~

CONTENTS

S No. Topic Page No.

Certificate from Guide ii

Acknowledgement iii

Preface iv

List of Figures and Tables v

1. Abstract 2

2. Introduction 3

3. Objective 5

4. Procedure 6

5. Frame Design & Analysis 7

5.1. Deciding Material properties

5.2. Ergonomics

5.3 Analysis of Frame

7

8

9

6. Suspension System 12

6.0.a. Basic Calculations in Spring Design

6.1. Design of Front and Rear Suspension

6.1.a. Calculation for Springs

6.1.b. Calculation for Spring Rate

6.1.c. Alternative Approach

6.2. Knuckles

14

14

14

15

16

18

7. Steering System 20

8. Braking System 22

9. Innovation 25

9.1. Mechanism

9.1.a. Hydraulic Mechanism

9.1.b. Gear Mechanism

9.1.c. Electric Mechanism

9.1.d. Computer Mechanism

9.1.e. Safety

25

25

25

26

26

26

10. Engine & Transmission 27

Page 6: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ vi ~

10.1 Methodology for Selection of

Transmission Components 28

11. Wheels & Tire Assembly 30

11.1. Rim

11.2. Tyre

11.3. Hub

11.4. Stub Axle

11.5. Axle

11.6. Vibration Control

11.7. Coupling

11.7.a. Engine with primary pulley

11.7.b. Primary Pulley to Secondary Pulley

11.7.c. Secondary Pulley to gear box

11.7.d. Gear box to axle

11.7.e. Welding joint in axle

11.7.f. Stub axle with hub

11.7.f.i. Calculation for Key

11.8. Wheel Assembly

30

30

30

31

32

32

32

33

33

33

33

33

34

34

34

12. Safety Feature 36

13. Specifications of our vehicles 37

14. Bill Of Materials 38

15. Financial Outlay 39

16. Conclusion 40

16.1. Future Scope 40

17. Glimpses 41

Page 7: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ vii ~

LIST of TABLES:

Table 1: Classification of Automobiles 3

Table 2: Properties of Roll Cage Material 7

Table 3: Final Analysis Data of Frame 10

Table 4: Parameters used in designing the suspension system: 13

Table 5: Final Specifications in Suspension Design 16

Table 6: Suspension Design Methodology 16

Table 7: Steering System Specifications 20

Table 8: Details of Project Costs 39

LIST of FIGURES:

Figure 1: Analysis of Crumpled Zone 9

Figure 2: Front Impact Test Analysis 10

Figure 3: Isometric View of Roll Cage 11

Figure 4: Side View of Roll Cage 11

Figure 5: Front View of Roll Cage 12

Figure 6: Top View of Roll Cage 12

Figure 7: Front and Rear Wish-bones 15

Figure 8: Metal pieces used to fabricate front and rear knuckles 18

Figure 9: Front Knuckle 19

Figure 10: Rear Knuckle 19

Figure 11: Fabrication Process under-way 21

Figure 12: Steering Shaft 21

Figure 13: Steering Rack 21

Figure 14: Steering Wheel 21

Figure 15: Brake Disc 23

Figure 16: Front and Rear Brake Callipers Mounting 23

Figure 17: Front and Rear Brake Calliper 23

Figure 18: Virtual Model and Prototype of Rear knuckle welded with rear calliper

mounting (with housing for two callipers) 24

Figure 19: Dynamic Stabilised Steering System Layout 26

Figure 20: Left and Right View of the Engine. 27

Page 8: BAJA 2013 final year project report

~ viii ~

Figure 21: Cone Pulleys of the CVT 28

Figure 22: Rim 30

Figure 23: Hubs made of Aluminum alloy using VMC 30

Figure 24: Fabrication of stub axle (in-process) 31

Figure 25: Stub Axle 31

Figure 26: Press-fitted bush in CVT 32

Figure 27: Front Wheel Assembly 35

Figure 28: Rear Wheel Assembly 35

Figure 29: Bucket Seat 36

Figure 30: Final Assembly of the vehicle 37

Figures 31, 32 & 33: Complete ATV, while participating in SAE India BAJA 2013,

competition in Indore. 41

LIST OF GRAPHS

Graph 1: Suspension angles at bump

(a) Camber angle (b) Toe Angle (c) Castor Angle 17

Graph 2: Suspension angles at roll

(a) Camber angle (b) Toe Angle (c) Castor Angle 17

Graph 3: CVT Characteristics (rpm-velocity) 29

Page 9: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 1

Design & Fabrication of an All Terrain Vehicle

Final Design Report

Kalyan Potukuchi (11091007),

Kanishk Raj (11091008),

Kuntal Basu (11091014),

Aditya Saini (11092459)

Vivek Sharma (11092366)

Nitish Benjwal (11092484)

Gurinder Singh (11090971)

Harpreet Singh (11092375)

Talwinder Singh (11092390)

Final Year, 2009-2013,

Mechanical Engineering Department,

Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College,

Mullana, Ambala, Haryana.

Page 10: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 2

1. ABSTRACT

The objective of our project is to design and fabricate an ‘All Terrain Vehicle.’ It is

aimed to simulate a real world engineering design project and their challenges. It involves the

planning and manufacturing tasks found when introducing a new product to the consumer

industrial market. Our primary focus is to design a single-sitter high-performance off-road

vehicle that will take the ruggedness of rough roads with maximum safety and driver comfort.

Page 11: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 3

2. INTRODUCTION

An automobile, motor car or car is a wheeled motor vehicle used for transporting

passengers, which also carries its own engine or motor. The word automobile comes, via the

French automobile from the Ancient Greek word αὐτός (autós, "self") and the Latin mobilis

("movable"); meaning a vehicle that moves by itself.

Automobiles may be classified by a number of different criteria and objectives.

However, comprehensive classification is elusive, because a vehicle may fit into multiple

categories, or not completely satisfy the requirements for any. The most widely used general

categorisation is summarised in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Classification of Automobiles

HLDI classification Definition

Sports Those cars with significant high performance features

Luxury Higher-end cars that are not classified as sports

Large Length more than 495.3 cm (195 in) and wheelbase more than

279.4 cm (110 in)

Midsize Length 457.3–495.3 cm (180–195 in) and wheelbase 266.8–

279.4 cm (105–110 in)

Small Length less than 457.2 cm (180 in) and wheelbase less than

266.7 cm (105 in)

An all-terrain vehicle (ATV), also known as a quad, quad bike, three-wheeler, or four-

wheeler, is defined by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) as a vehicle that

travels on low-pressure tyres, with a seat that is straddled by the operator, along with

handlebars for steering control. As the name implies, it is designed to handle a wider variety of

terrain than most other vehicles.

ATVs are intended for use by a single operator, the rider sits on and operates these

vehicles like a motorcycle, but the extra wheels give more stability at slower speeds. The first

three-wheeled ATV was the Sperry-Rand tri-cart. It was designed in 1967 as a graduate project

of John Plessinger at the Cranbrook Academy of Arts near Detroit. The Tri-cart was straddle-

ridden with a sit-in rather than sit-on style.

The primary aim of this project is to design and fabricate an All-Terrain Vehicle — a

four wheeler that will take on rugged non-motorable roads with ease and have paramount

Page 12: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 4

importance to driver safety. We have strived to self-design and manufacture most of our

components while some have been readily bought from the market and customised as per our

requirements. As a guideline, we have taken the rules and guidelines stipulated for SAEINDIA

BAJA 2013. (http://www.bajasaeindia.org/down/Rulebook%20Final.pdf). We shall use a

Briggs & Stratton 10 Hp OHV Model 205432 engine as our power source. All other

components selected have been elaborated in details.

Page 13: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 5

3. OBJECTIVE

The main objective of our project is to attain the following in our vehicle:

To have maximum ground clearance.

For thus we have used a double wish bone type independent suspension.

To have maximum traction in the roughest of roads.

Independent suspension ensures the wheels are always in touch with the ground,

the special treads of off-road tires provides good traction, use of cutting brakes

ensures that power can be transferred to the other wheel when one wheel skids

or is stuck.

To give maximum precedence to driver/rider safety.

For this strict conformance to SAE and ARAI designing norms have been

ensured. Further, an innovative and indigenously designed dynamically

stabilised steering system was being developed.

Reduce Vehicle weight.

Wherever possible, light materials like aluminium and its alloys have been used.

Composite materials or plastics could also be used.

Augment performance by minimising power loss.

A continuously variable transmission (CVT) shall be used.

Basically our vehicle shall be a unique single-seat, off-road, rugged, recreational

and fun-to-drive vehicle which in intended for sale to weekend off-road enthusiasts.

Page 14: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 6

4. PROCEDURE

To achieve our goal we have completed the tasks under different sub-heads like —

Frame/Chassis, Suspension, Wheel & Tire Assembly, Steering, Brakes, Engine,

Transmission, Fabrication/Body-Work. For design, analysis and optimisation of various

vehicle components different CAD modelling and Analysis software like Solid-Works,

Pro-E, ANSYS, Lotus is being used.

Initially we went through different design manuals, SAE and other automotive

industry papers to know about the standards to be adopted and most commonly used

materials and fabrication processes.

Once material and component was finalised, each of them were modelled using

software. Some of our components like wheel hub and its assembly have been

indigenously designed and manufactured, while some components were purchased from

the market. All individual components were assembled to prepare a virtual model of the

car. Emphasis was laid on the ergonomics of the vehicle. The roll cage was tested at 10g-

force and found to have a factor of safety of 2.15.

Further extensive market survey was undertaken to ensure all material and

components chosen could be readily available when fabricating. We also prepared a

project budget based on the figures obtained from market survey. Necessary changes were

made if availability was a problem.

After fabrication, exhaustive test trails were conducted to ensure adept

performance. This was followed by body-work and painting.

Page 15: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 7

5. FRAME DESIGN The initial material chosen for fabricating the Roll cage was AISI 4130. The dimensions

of the chosen pipe were 1.25 inch outer diameter and 2mm thickness. Due to its high yield

strength we could make use of pipes with larger Outer Diameter and less thickness which

helped in reducing the weight of our Roll cage substantially. But, due to the unavailability of

material in small quantity (suitable for constructing a single vehicle) we were forced to use a

more commonly available material i.e., AISI 1018. Comparison of the properties of the two

materials is shown in Table 2. Circular pipes of 1 inch outer diameter and wall thickness of 3

mm were used and square pipes of 1.25 inch sides were used for the base.

Table 2: Properties of Roll Cage Material

Properties AISI 4130 AISI 1018

Category Steel Steel

Class Alloy Steel Carbon Steel

Composition (Weight %)

C : 0.28-0.33 Mn : 0.40-0.60 P : 0.035 (max) S : 0.04 (max) Cr : 0.80 - 1.10 Mo : 0.15-0.25

C : 0.15-0.20 Mn : 0.60-0.90 P : 0.04 (max) S : 0.05 (max)

Density (x1000 kg/m3) 7.7 - 8.03 7.7 - 8.03

Elastic Modulus (GPa) 190-210 190-210

Tensile Strength (MPa) 560.5 634

Yield Strength (MPa) 360.6 386

Hardness (HB) 156 197

MIG Welding was utilised as it provides better strength and clean welds.

The change in material and thickness, though reduced the manufacturing cost, posed a

serious problem of increase in mass which also decreased the FOS from 2.12 to 1.87 in a front

impact condition. Hence, the entire frame was re-analysed after taking into consideration the

new data that had been introduced.

5.1. Deciding Material Properties:-

Material Selection – 20% of the weight of our vehicle is of the roll cage. So we decided to use

alloy steel of high yield strength. This ensured that pipe of larger diameter and less thickness

Page 16: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 8

can be used thus reducing the overall weight of our roll cage. The most suitable for our

purpose was use of AISI 4130 steel. However, the cost of the material in small quantity was

not feasible for our project. Evaluating other options based on our requirements, the most

suitable next choice was AISI 1018.

Primary Members : O.D. – 1inch, Thickness – 3mm

Secondary Members : O.D. – 1inch, Thickness – 2mm

Secondary members of less thickness were used to reduce weight of our roll cage. Another

major design goal was to more effectively pack all components in order to decrease the length

of roll cage. This has been successfully obtained through our compact design.

Solid works was used for Modelling and analysis of our design, results of which are shown

below. Proper mounting points for engine, Gearbox and Suspension links are provided in roll

cage. Electric arc welding was used for welding roll cage.

First a prototype of PVC pipes before manufacturing roll cage was made in order to check

space as well as comfort for driver. After satisfactory ergonomics was tested, the final roll-cage

was fabricated.

5.2 ERGONOMICS:

It is very important for our vehicle to be driver friendly such that driver should not feel

fatigue in long endurance run. This part of vehicle designing was given proper care such that

fun to drive vehicle can be made.

In order to achieve this goal following techniques are used to make driver feel comfortable:-

1) All the controls of vehicle were kept as close as possible to driver.

2) Brake and Accelerator pedals were installed and removed many times to mount it to

proper position which can be comfortable to our driver.

3) Steering has been made adjustable so that both drivers can adjust it according to their

requirements.

4) As we will face different types of terrains as well as turns time and again so changing of

gears again and again will make driver feel fatigue in 4 hour long endurance run. To

tackle with this problem CVT was used which made driver free from pressing clutch

again and again and also shifting of gears is also not required.

5) Seat from Sparco has been used.

Page 17: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 9

5.3 ANALYSIS OF FRAME:

Figure 1: Analysis of Crumpled Zone

The frame was designed and analysed using SolidWorks (a design and analysis

software). As there are no fixed amounts of force that a vehicle can endure in a frontal collision

and by using entities such as mass (vehicle) and its presumed top speed; a maximum force of

only 18000 N was derived, but there may be even serious conditions of collision than the ones

that are projected. Hence, a benchmark (of maximum endurable force) was to be finalised at

which our vehicle could sustain a collision and still have an FOS of at least 2. According to

U.S.A. automotive industry norms, all vehicles must be tested at a force of 10G’s, since an

average human body can only endure a force of 9G’s. A force of 10G’s comes out to be around

29,345 N or 30,000 N. Hence, the frame was tested at a force of 30,000 N in front impact

producing a FOS of 2.1 was achieved, but the impact caused a huge displacement of the force

throughout the frame.

The redundancies against this were chalked out and the frame was further optimized to

get an F.O.S. of 5.1, where a crumple zone was generated in the front part of the frame which

absorbed most of the damage leaving the cock-pit safe for the driver, was chosen as our final

design. Figure 1, shows the stress distribution in the frame (it may be noted that the entire stress

concentrates in the crumple zone) and figure 2, depicts the displacement of the frame in case of

front collision at 30,000 N.

Page 18: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 10

Figure 2: Front Impact Test Analysis

The frame was also tested under conditions of rear impact, bump impact, roll over, etc. The

related data is summarised in Table 3.

Table 3: Final Analysis Data of Frame

S.

No. Name of the Test FOS Max. stress Max. Displacement

1. Front impact (10G) 5.1 110,104,380 N/mm2 1.1720 mm

2. Rear impact (5G) 6.4 90,872,256 N/mm2 1.1388 mm

3. Roll over (2.5G) 3.0 151,804,816 N/mm2 0.4594 mm

4. Bump impact (6000N) 8.2 217,156 N/mm2 0.9631 mm

The drawings of the frame with necessary dimensions are shown in figures 3, 4, 5 and 6. The

frame was fabricated using the MIG welding set-up in Welding Shop of our College. It was

coated with red-oxide to prevent rusting. Further chainers were attached to the frame and holes

drilled wherever required. A few new braces were also added where physical satisfaction of the

frame was not achieved. Finally very thin sheet metal (mild steel) was welded to the surface

and was used to generate a characteristic body of the vehicle. Later the entire frame was spray

painted.

Page 19: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 11

Figure 3: Isometric View of Roll Cage

Figure 4: Side View of Roll Cage

Page 20: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 12

Figure 5: Front View of Roll Cage

Fig 6: Top View of Roll Cage

Page 21: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 13

6. SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Suspension is the term signifying the assemblage of the system of springs, shock

absorbers and linkages that connects a vehicle to its wheels and allows relative motion between

the two.

Suspension systems serve dual purposes —

i. Contributing to the vehicle's road-holding/handling and braking for good active safety

and driving pleasure, and

ii. Keeping vehicle occupants comfortable and reasonably well isolated from road noise,

bumps, and vibrations, etc.

For our vehicle we have used a Double Wishbone Independent Suspension system. This

is because of the following factors:

Wishbone suspension give more movement of the tyres and hence the vehicle, for the

same movement of the spring.

Independent suspension.

In double wishbone suspension, force is distributed at 5 points on the roll cage unlike in

Mac-Pherson strut where force acts at only one point.

It can be slightly adjusted for different parameters of suspension tuning like camber

angle, ground clearance at the time of testing.

Control movement at the wheel during vertical suspension travel and steering, both of

which influence handling and stability.

Table 4: Parameters used in designing the suspension system

Estimated weight of the vehicle 270 kg

Driver with accessories 80 kg

Overall weight of the vehicle 350 kg

Un-sprung mass 70 kg

Sprung mass (with driver) 280 kg

For designing the springs the sprung weight of the vehicle is considered.

Page 22: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 14

6.0.a. Basic Calculation in Spring Design:

Front lower wishbone length = 390.993mm

Damper mounting = 245.54mm

Motion ratio = 245.54/390.993 = 0.628

Natural frequency = 2 Hz

According to this motion ratio, natural frequency and taking 40% sprung mass for front,

spring rate is calculated as

Spring Constant = 24N/mm

Suspension travel = 10inch

Length of shock absorbers = 24inch

Similarly for rear taking 60% sprung mass, the spring rate is calculated as

Motion ratio = 0.712

Natural frequency = 2.4 Hz

Spring Constant = 32N/mm Travel = 10inch

Length of shock absorbers = 24inch

6.1. DESIGN OF FRONT AND REAR SUSPENSION SYSTEM

For the front, we are using unequal A-shaped Control Arm Double Wishbone System.

This was selected based on calculations for Roll Centre, Camber Angle, Caster Angle, King-pin

Inclination, Scrub Radius, etc. The design was tested under static analytical conditions and found

to be safe. The dynamic calculations were stimulated and analysed in LOTUS. Graphs plotted

justified design considerations.

On the rear side, we have used unequal H-shaped control arm for providing high

stability, at the same time to minimize the yaw motion without affecting the travel. Design

procedure adapted for the rear was similar to that of the front suspension.

Suspension arm was made of 1018 steel pipe of OD 1 inch with 3 mm wall thickness.

In front we have used ball joints of off road THAR jeep and in rear we have used bushes of 1

inch diameter and 2 inch length with the aim of minimizing the rear-yaw motion.

6.1.a. Calculation for Springs:

Analytical method is used in spring rate calculation and for that we had to take some parameters,

given in table 4.

Page 23: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 15

6.1.b. Calculation for spring rate:

We found that spring rate is depends upon motion ratio and wheel rate in the following way:

Front lower wishbone length = 409.423mm

Damper mount = 286.596mm

Motion ratio = = = 0.700

Natural frequency (f) = 2 Hz

According to this motion ratio, natural frequency and taking 40% of sprung mass for

front, spring rate is calculated as

K spring = 21 N/mm

Suspension travel = 10inch

Length of shock absorbers = 26inch

Similarly for rear taking 60% sprung mass, the spring rate is calculated as

Natural frequency (f) = 2.4 Hz

Motion ratio = 0.712

K spring = 30 N/mm

Figure 7: Front & Rear Wish-bones

Page 24: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 16

6.1.c Alternative approach:

We know that spring rate is calculated as:-

K spring = ,

where, G - Modulus of rigidity or shear modulus of spring material

d - Wire diameter

n - Number of active coils

D - Mean coil diameter

After considering all the above calculated data the suspension was designed and implemented

with the following specifications and dimensions.

Table 5: Final Specifications in Suspension Design

Specifications FRONT REAR

Roll Centre (Static) 175.62 mm 197.5 mm

Static Camber 2 degree

Static Caster 3 degree NA

King pin Inclination 12 degree 8 degree

Scrub Radius 26.5 mm 18.034 mm

Table 6: Suspension Design Methodology

Page 25: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 17

Graph 1: Angles at BUMP Graph 2: Angles at ROLL

Graph 1(a) Graph 2(a)

Graph 1(b) Graph 2(b)

Graph 1(c) Graph 2(c)

Page 26: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 18

6.2 KNUCKLES:

For the purpose of attaining desired configuration of the assemblies of braking system

to tyres and axles, the knuckles were self-fabricated. The front knuckle was fabricated as per

the requirements of the steering system, suspension system, braking system and tyres, whereas,

the rear knuckle was fabricated as per the requirements of the transmission system, suspension

system, braking system and tyres.

These knuckles were designed through the process of stress analysis and tested on

software. Firstly, the blueprint was designed using information obtained from the suspension

system specifications calculated, brake calliper positions and the inner diameter of the rim and

other adjacent components. Then, the design was tested with the amount of stresses the vehicle

had to endure during its running life and conditions; wherein a FOS of more than 3 was attained

for front and rear knuckles.

After the design was finalised, a prototype was fabricated to test the durability of the

designed knuckle. Further, the knuckles were modified to allow calliper mountings to be

welded upon them.

Figure 8: Metal pieces used to fabricate front and rear knuckles

Page 27: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 19

Figure 9: Front Knuckle

Figure 10: Rear Knuckle

Page 28: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 20

7. STEERING SYSTEM

Steering is the term applied to the collection of components, linkages, etc. which will

allow a vessel or vehicle to follow its desired course. The basic aim for us is to reduce the

steering effort to minimum with maximum steering response.

Design Methodology

Type of Steering System Decided

Lightest Assembly of that system found

Rack Length Measured

Steering Arm Length and Angle decided

Maximum Turning Angle Found

Table 7: Steering System Specifications

Steering Ratio 11:1

Maximum Turning

Angle

45 Degree (Inner)

30.23 Degree (Outer)

Turning Radius 2.5meter

Steering Arm Length 4”

Steering Arm angle 15 Degree

Tie rod length 12”

Rack Length 13”

Ackerman Geometry is adhered to in our steering system. Over steering is used to

decrease the steering ratio. Rack and Pinion arrangement has been chosen for its simplicity,

light weight, easy to assemble. Steering system of Maruti 800 is modified to make it centre

steering. A modified steering rack of Maruti 800 vehicle is used.

Page 29: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 21

Figure 11: Fabrication process under-way

Figure 12: Steering Shaft

Figure 13: Steering Rack

Figure 14: Steering Wheel

Page 30: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 22

8. BRAKING SYSTEM

A brake is a mechanical device which slows or stops motion. The purpose of braking

system is to increase the manoeuvrability by locking all the wheels in the shortest possible

time span. Our aim was to design a braking system which is easy to operate and light in

weight. Hydraulically actuated disc brakes have been used. Disc as well as calliper of

APACHE RTR 180 is used. Cutting brakes with hand operated master cylinder has been

employed at rear wheels to augment efficiency and safety of the vehicle by:

1) increasing the steering efficiency at corners by locking a single wheel by using cutting

brakes.

2) moving our vehicle out from the situation when one of the wheels is slipping and the

whole power is being transferred to the slipping wheel so by locking that wheel we can

transfer the power to the wheel in contact with the ground

Disc brakes of Apache RTR180 were used due to their small size which can

easily fit in rim. Also disc brakes of APACHE are of petal type which makes them more

efficient. Tandem master cylinder of Maruti 800 was used because of its separate braking

circuit at front and rear.

Modified pedal of Maruti 800 is used with leverage ratio of 6:1. Cutting brakes are

used in order to remove the drawbacks of open differential. Thus two separate levers are

installed and two separate callipers have been used. Both levers are connected to calliper

independently. Hand brake levers of Maruti 800 are used because of its availability in market.

Now we need master cylinder with one point delivery valve for cutting brakes. As no master

cylinder of single delivery point is available so Clutch cylinder of Tata Sumo is used as master

cylinder for cutting brake system with a modified fluid having low viscosity.

Stopping distance, as calculated theoretically, is 1.2 m.

Cutting brakes are a system of levers, switches, or pedals that allows the driver to lock

up individual brakes in order to stop one wheel and then use the other wheels to drive the

vehicle, thus pivoting around that locked wheel. This results in a tremendously tight turning

radius, and they can be implemented in a variety of ways. Cutting brakes operate by using

levers to actuate small master cylinders that apply each rear brake independently. It is placed

in open mode. One wheel is locked and vehicle pivots on the locked corner.

Weight distribution is approximated to be 60:40. If we stop our vehicle within 16

meters weight transfer of 55 kg from rear to front will take place.

During turning, bump and rebound of a vehicle, the centre of gravity of the vehicle

Page 31: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 23

shifts according to forces acting on the chassis. In our innovation, we try to stop this shifting

of C.O.G by implying counter forces responsible for C.O.G shifting.

Figure 15: Brake Disc

Figure 16: Front and Rear Brake Callipers Mounting

Figure 17: Front and Rear Brake Callipers

Page 32: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 24

The entire calliper mounting was designed from the data acquired from the internal

diameter of the rim, the dimensions of the brake calliper and the dimensions of the knuckle

being used (front or rear knuckle). The calliper mountings once designed were tested for any

dimensional discrepancies while being attached to the brake calliper. Then the callipers were

fabricated using Laser Beam cutting machine to obtain impeccable dimensional tolerances.

Then these calliper mountings were welded to the knuckle to form a single body. The design

of knuckle and its analysis was done separately before welding the calliper mountings to it.

Figure 18: Virtual Model and Prototype of Rear knuckle welded with rear calliper

mounting (with housing for two callipers)

Page 33: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 25

9. INNOVATION

During turning, bump or rebound of a vehicle, centre of gravity of vehicle shifts

according to forces acting on chassis. In our innovation, we try to stop this shifting of C.O.G

by implying counter forces responsible for C.O.G shifting.

9.1. Mechanism

There are four sections in innovation:-

A. Hydraulic mechanism

B. Gear mechanism

C. Electrical mechanism

D. Computer Section

9.1.A. Hydraulic mechanism:

Components used for innovation:

1) Piston (For front wheel) - 2

2) Piston (For rear wheel) - 2

3) Pipes - According to size

4) Pipe joints

5) Safety valves

6) Safety lever

9.1.B. Gear mechanism:

In this, the power from the motor to the piston is transferred. There are two pairs if

piston is used. Each pair contains two piston and these pairs are connect with each other to

a rack.

Rack: Rack has teeth on double sides.

Pinion Gears: Pinion is attached to rack. It is used to convert its rotary motion into

rack’s reciprocating motion.

Worm: Worm is attached to the pinion. It is used to restrict the motion in one direction.

1. Vehicle can easily be turn at high speed avoiding the problem of rolling and hard

turn.

2. Effect of bumper, bound, dive and squat is minimizing to extreme level.

Page 34: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 26

3. Now shifting of C.O.G is being controlled, so the drive is more comfortable

for the driver.

4. Skidding is also controlled. We maximize the limit of tire’s traction by counter the

forces.

9.1.C. Electrical Mechanism:

In electrical mechanism, a pre-programmed electronic circuit is used to determine how

much power has to be transferred to motor on the basis of shifting of Centre of Gravity.

9.1.D. Computer Mechanism:

In this mechanism basic input of signal from sensors are converted into

useful coding. it is used to control amount of current control transfer and coding

and decoding of sensor is done.

9.1.E. Safety:

We would use safety valves, so that in case of fluid leakage then valves will be

automatically closed and suspension acts like ordinary suspension. We would use safety lever

for the convenience of the driver. If driver feels any problem in suspension then he can stop or

disengage all mechanisms.

Figure 19: Dynamically Stabilised Steering System Layout

Page 35: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 27

10. ENGINE & TRANSMISSION

A lot of emphasis has been placed on the design of power train. Our objective is to

harness the power of 10 HP engine and efficiently deliver this power to the tires for peak

performance. In design of the drive train the optimization of several desired

characteristics are being kept in mind including towing capacity, acceleration, top

speed, and durability. Every internal combustion engine have a power band (range of

speed) at which the engine produces the maximum torque, below or above this power band

the engine does not provide enough torque to overcome the resistance torque and

accelerate the vehicle. Such a small amount of power within the power band is not sufficient

for the performance required.

Therefore we either have many gear speeds or we use a CVT (Continuously Variable

Transmission). Continuously variable transmission (CVT) belt drive is a device that is much

smoother than a conventional transmission and also has the ability to harness peak engine

power during operation. The CVT transmits power from the engine to drive train in place of a

conventional clutch dependent multi-gear transmission that requires constant shifting to

change reduction ratios. It consists of two variable pitch pulleys, the drive and the driven, that

semi-dependently change their ratios depending on the RPM at which they spin and the

amount of torque required.

The goal of the design for driveline is to eliminate as many losses, in transfer of

power from engine to the wheels, as possible. To accomplish this goal the drive train

consists of CVT, chain and sprocket and differential.

Figure 20: Left and Right View of the Engine.

Page 36: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 28

We are using a BRIGGS & STRATTON 10 Hp OHV Model 205432 Engine. The

CVT we are using is of POIARIS P90 with low gear ratio 0.75:1 and high gear ratio 3.83:1.

The differential used is of MAHINDRA ALPHA with gear ratio 4.173: 1. We will couple the

axles of MAHINDRA ALPHA CHAMPION & MARUTI 800. The custom made stub axle of

material EN-119 is to be used.

The size of tyres to be used is 23 x 8 x 12. As the engine reaches its governed rpm

limit 3800 rpm, the gear reduction across the CVT have been determined to be 0.75:1

and thus serving as an "overdrive" for the car. At low engine speeds the CVT produces a

reduction of 3.83:1 providing necessary torque considered for the half shafts because of their

ability to transmit torque through a higher range of suspension articulation. These features will

create a vehicle that utilizes all of its power in a smooth, quick transition from rest to top

speed, and ensures minimal maintenance. We plan to restrict our top speed to 45 kmph, the

vehicle being an off-roader.

Figure 21: Cone Pulleys of the CVT

10.1. Methodology for selection of Transmission Components:

A study on comparison between different transmission systems was done. CVT was best suited

for our application due to:-

1. Efficient power transmission capability

Page 37: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 29

2. Simplicity in Setting up the system

3. Automatic Gear Ratio Selection thus reducing Human Errors.

4. Elimination of Clutch Assembly

Based on the study and discussions with old

teams regarding off road conditions at Pithampur

track top speed of 45-50kph was decided. Data

provided by Briggs and Stratton states maximum

rpm of engine as 3800 which can be considered

as constant. Finally gear ratio of 8.5-9.5 was

required to achieve top speed. Polaris P90 model

of CVT was selected due to its wide range of gear

ratios i.e. 0.76:1 to 3.83:1. Graph 3: CVT characteristics

There was a doubt regarding selection of type of differential to be used for which

benchmarking was done for different types considering various factors.

Open Differential was used based on above result. But problem of power loss during

slipping were considered as serious one so a proper solution was to be found. Cutting brakes

were used to remove the flaws of open differential system .Now with the help of cutting

brakes it is possible for us to lock slipping tyre and thus proper power transmission to the tyre

in contact with ground.

Now, due to overdrive of CVT setup final drive ratio of 11-12 was required. Reverse

gear was also a necessity for our vehicle so based on all these requirements, market survey

was done from which we came to know that Mahindra Alpha Champion gearbox comes with

two types of differentials (Open). Gear ratios of both differentials were 2.32:1 and 4.16:1.

Gearbox was dismantled and was found that if its 3rd gear is used in reverse with differential

having final drive of 4.16:1 then we get Top Speed of 50.54kph. Using Mahindra Alpha

Champion gearbox all the requirements were fulfilled i.e.

1) Required Gear Ratio

2) Reverse Gear

3) Open Differential.

To reduce the rotating mass a little modification was done with gearbox. All

other except third and fourth gears were removed from the gearbox.

Page 38: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 30

11. WHEELS & TYRE ASSEMBLY

11.1. Rim: Selection of Rim was the most

crucial factor to be decided as knuckle,

Disc and Calipers were to be placed

inside the rim, so, proper space must be

allocated there, to do so. Also, the

weight of rim must be less in order to

decrease rotational inertia of moving

parts. So, selection of rim size was done

by design, suspension and braking

department which had been discussed in

their respective departments. Figure 22: Rim

Rim from Polaris of Diameter – 12inch and width – 6inch were finalized for use, as

they are light in weight.

11.2 TYRES: Tyres were decided on the basis of final drive at axle and top speed required.

It was also required to choose the tyre of less weight in order to decrease the rotating mass.

So LOW INERTIA BKT tyres of size 24 x 8 -12 were used.

11.3. HUB: Hub had to be self-manufactured as PCD of Polaris Rims did not match with

available standard. The hub had to be bolted to the rim at one end and to the disc rotor of

Apache RTR 180’s rear brake on the other.

Figure 23: Hubs made of Aluminum alloy using VMC

Page 39: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 31

So, a hub was designed and fabricated according to the required dimensions & special

needs such as strength, structural integrity, etc. and also an effort was made to reduce the

weight of the hub, by using Aluminum alloy as the material for HUB.

Figure 24: Fabrication of stub axle (in-process)

T6 6061Grade is used due to its following properties:-

1. Ultimate high tensile strength.

2. Light weight

The hub fabrication also created a problem of locking the axle, which was

rectified by the use of grooves cut inside the hub where locks were placed to hold the axle

and stub axle sub-assembly.

11.4. STUB AXLE: Stub axle, as we know,

plays a crucial role in transmission of power

form the axle to the wheels through the

knuckle. Stub Axle of Maruti 800 has been

used in the manufacturing of this ATV. The

stub axle is very difficult to design as

precision is required so as to achieve the

proper meshing of stub axle to the power

transmission. In Maruti, stub axle and hub is

a single unit as they are manufactured by, Figure 25: Stub Axle

Page 40: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 32

casting process so, cutting off of the hub until its stub-axle or required dimensions have

been achieved was the way to go. So, the stub axle was acquired from the MARUTI 800

hub. The only reason to take Maruti 800’s stub axle is that it has proper meshing with the

axle of Maruti 800 and this meshing must be kept as smooth as possible for better

transmission of torque.

11.5. AXLE: Axle of Alpha champion is used on the differential side as differential of alpha

champion has been used. Further, the axle is welded to Maruti 800 axle as stub axle of

Maruti has been used on the hub side, as the internal and external splines of stub axle and

axle mesh properly thus resulting in proper power transmission. Hence, both the different

axles were welded together to form one body, then they were machined (surface grinding)

for crack removal and also heat-treated to remove any residual stresses introduced.

11.6. Vibration Control: To control the vibration of Engine and Gear box we installed

three dampers of Maruti 800 engine and placed the entire assembly of Engine, CVT,

Gearbox and axles over these three dampers. The entire assembly of the transmission

system was then in connection with the vehicle through only these three dampers and

hence all the vibrations from the assembly were isolated to the transmission system itself.

This also reduced the slipping of the CVT belt as the engine and gearbox were now in a

synchronized vibrational state.

11.7 COUPLINGS: Coupling of different components in transmission system is to be

done with utmost care, using best efficient system and reducing weight of components.

Maximum loss of power occurs at couplings.

Figure 26: Press-fitted bush in CVT & Key fitted in Engine shaft

Page 41: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 33

Coupling of different components has been done as follows:

11.7.a. Engine with Primary Pulley: - Outer diameter of Engine shaft is 25.4 mm and Inner

diameter of CVT where shaft is to be inserted is 30mm. Keyway is provided on Engine

shaft. So a method was selected such that modification of Engine Shaft and CVT need not

be required. Bush of Outer diameter- 30mm and Inner Diameter-25.4mm was made and

press fitted in CVT.

A little weld joints were provided to avoid slipping of bush on CVT. A keyway is

made on bush. Key of material EN31was made.

EN31 material was used because of following properties:-

a. High resisting nature against wear.

b. Ability to bear high surface loads.

Key was press-fitted on Engine shaft and finally CVT coupled with Engine.

11.7.b. Primary Pulley to Secondary Pulley – through V- Belt

11.7.c. Secondary Pulley to Gearbox: There are internal splines on gearbox as well as CVT

so a shaft is made according to those splines with uttermost care such that power loss as

well as wearing of splines due to play is reduced. EN19 Material was used for making

shaft due to following reasons:

a. Shock resisting.

b. Resistance to wear.

c. Ability to bear high stress.

11.7.d. Gearbox to Axle: Gearbox and Axle of same vehicle i.e. Mahindra Alpha Champion

is used so no need to make coupling.

11.7.e. Alpha Champion Axle welded to Maruti 800: Done with utmost care as improper

welding may lead to vibrations in shaft or failure may take place which can be fatal for

driver.

Page 42: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 34

11.7.f. Stub Axle with Hub: A keyway was made on Stub axle and inside hub. A key was

placed in keyway of stub axle and press-fitted inside hub. Same material of key was used as

was used in Engine.

11.7.f.i. Calculation for key:-

Shear strength ( s) = 202.5 MPa

Compressive strength (Cs) = 585 MPa

Torque (T) = 350 N-m

Width of key (b) = 6.6 mm

Height of key (h) = 4.8 mm

Length of key (L) = 63.5 mm

Mean diameter of bush (Do) = Diameter of bush – Depth of groove

= 30 – 2.42 = 27.58 mm

Tmax =

= 1161.8N-m

(Factor of safety = 1161.8/350 = 3.32)

T’max =

=

= 1220.52 N-m

(Factor of safety = 1220.52/350 = 3.49)

11.8. WHEEL ASSEMBLY: When all the necessary component assembly are

fabricated, the wheel assembly is completed. The components of rear wheel assembly are

Rear knuckle, rear calliper mounting, 2 brake callipers, disc rotor, hub, stub axle, locks on

both sides to keep the axle from sliding, etc. . The front wheel assembly consists of the

components such as Front knuckle, front calliper mounting, brake calliper, disc rotor, hub,

stub axle, locks on both sides to keep the hub and knuckle locked to each other, etc. All the

components of the wheel assembly are assembled and tested again and again, so, as to

check for errors.

Page 43: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 35

Figure 27: Front Wheel Assembly

Figure 28: Rear Wheel Assembly

Page 44: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 36

12. SAFETY FEATURES OF OUR VEHICLE

Safe Roll cage design.

Evacuation - Easy entry & quick exit possible.

Proper firewall & body panels.

Firewall insulated with asbestos sheets.

Removable steering wheel.

Driver gears- helmet, goggles, suit, neck collar, restraints

Tube Padding – The minimum required thickness is ½”.

Kill Switches – 2 required, cockpit and external.

Safety Harness – 5 strap system, 3” lap belt, quick release connecters

Fire extinguisher – 2 required, 1 liter, ISI rated. One mounted in cockpit and one for

accessories.

Figure 29: Bucket Seat

Page 45: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 37

13. THE SPECIFICATIONS OF OUR VEHICLE

Overall Length: 94”

Wheelbase: 72”

Track Widths: Front - 51” Rear - 49”

Weight without Driver: 270 Kgs;

Frame Weight with Brackets: 45 Kgs

Weight Distribution of 42:58

Wheels: BKT; Front & Rear: 24 x 8 - 12

Ground Clearance: 10”

Suspension and Steering:

Front Suspension: Double wishbone equal length, non-parallel (A-arms)

Rear Suspension: Double wishbone equal length, non-parallel (A-arms)

Centre of Gravity Design Height: 482.6 mm

Centered Rack and pinion, Steering Ratio of 11:1

Engine: Briggs & Stratton 305cc, 10Hp

Transmission:

Polaris P90 CVT giving drive to Differential.

Braking system

Tandem master cylinder, Apache RTR 180 rear disc

Cutting brakes with hand operated master cylinder

Figure 30: Final Assembly of the vehicle

Page 46: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 38

S No. Item Quantity

1 Steering Wheel 1

2 Steering Column 1

3 Pinion Assembly 1

4 Rack Rod 1

5 Tie Rods 2

6 Ball Joint 4

7 Rack Ends 2

8 Bushes 4

9 Clampers 4

10 Steering Gaiter 3

14. BILL OF MATERIALS

DRIVE TRAIN

STEERING SYSTEM

BRAKING SYSTEM

ENGINE

FRAME

SUSPENSION

S No. Item Quantity

1 Primary Pulley 1

2 Secondary Pulley 1

3 Spring 1

4 Flyweight 3

5 Belt 1

6 Driving Sprocket 1

7 Driven Sprocket 1

8 Chain 1

9 Differential 1

10 Axle 4

11 Stub Axle 4

12 CVT Cover 1

13 Tires 5

14 Rim 4

15 Hub 4

16 Bearings 4

17 Shift Mechanism 1

S No. Item

Quantity 1 Brake Pedal 1

2 Master Cylinder 1

3 Brake Linings (Rubber) 4

4 Brake Linings (Metallic) 4

5 Disc Rotor 4

6 Brake Calliper 4

7 Brake Fluid 1

8 Disc Mounting 4

9 Hand Operated Lever 1

10 Brake Calliper

(cutting 10 brakes)

2

11 Brake Lining

(cutting brakes) 4

S No. Item Quantity

1 Engine 1

2 Choke 1

3 Accelerator 1

4 Pedal Cables 2

6 Spill Prevention 1

S No. Item Quantity

1 Structural Members 68

2 Roll Cage 1

3 Mounts 58

4 Firewall 1

5 Seat 1

Sl No. Item Quantity

1 Rear lower control arm 2

2 Rear upper control arm 2

3 Front Lower control arm 2

4 Front upper control arm 2

5 Rear Knuckle 2

6 Front Knuckle 2

7 Ball Joints 4

8 Bushes 24

9 Shock Absorbers 4

10 Shackles 8

11 Innovation 1

Page 47: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 39

15. FINANCIAL OUTLAY

Table 8: Details of Project Costs

CATEGORY ITEMS CATEGORY COST (RS.)

Frame Steel Tubing, Sheet Metal

Welding Supplies

30,000

Power Train Gearbox, Rear Axle, Joints,

Chain, Sprocket & Bearings

1,30,000

Electronic Systems Pedal shifters, tachometer,

ECU etc.

10,000

Suspension Shocks, Springs, A-Arms, 20,000

Wheels and Tires Polaris Wheels & Tires

(4 + 1 spares)

90,000

Steering Rack & Pinion, Steering Arm,

Steering Wheel, Steering

Column etc.

15,000

Braking Callipers Pedal + Lever

Cylinders + Cables

20,000

Body Fibreglass, Pads, Ply Boards 20,000

Safety Equipment Driver Suit, fire extinguisher

Seat belt, goggles, Helmet etc.

50,000

Miscellaneous Travel, transportation, 50,000

Engine 30,000

Total: 4,65,000

Page 48: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 40

16. CONCLUSION

The fabricated vehicle has performed more than satisfactorily at SAEINDIA BAJA 2013 held

at National Automotive Testing Tracks (NATRAX), Pithampura, Madhya Pradesh. The vehicle

successfully cleared all the strict technical inspections conducted by the team of engineers from

Mahindra & Mahindra and Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI). In fact, we received

rich praises for the effort put in designing and fabricating the vehicle.

The tests endured by our vehicle include Break Test (all four wheels lock simultaneously),

Acceleration Test, Figure of Eight Test (the vehicle moved in a 8 shaped track with radius of 3 meters

without reversing and at considerable speed), Hill Climb Test (220 slope for 100 meters),

Manoeuvrability Test (the vehicle was made to go through L-turns, hair-pin bends, mud-pits, sand,

over logs, etc.) and most importantly the 4-hour long endurance run, which we successfully completed

in the top 15!

16.1 Future-scope:

However, the vehicle still has a scope of improvement. The innovative dynamic stabilised

steering system being developed can be very helpful in reducing driver fatigue. Extensive studies may

be undertaken in the areas of emission and engine efficiency with an aim to develop a greener vehicle.

Page 49: BAJA 2013 final year project report

Page | 41

Figures 31, 32 & 33: Complete

ATV, while participating in SAE

India BAJA 2013, competition in

Indore.