balancing incentive program webinar (nov 2011)

27
Section 10202 of the Affordable Care Act Mission Analytics Group and HSRI in collaboration with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) November 2011

Upload: edkako

Post on 14-Jul-2015

731 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Section 10202 of the

Affordable Care Act

Mission Analytics Group and HSRI in collaboration with

the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

November 2011

Presentation Outline

2

1. Overview of the Program

3. Reporting Requirements

2. Applying to the Program

4. Frequently Asked Questions

Ben

efi

ts o

f th

e P

rogra

m

3

• Support States in providing quality care in the most appropriate, least restrictive settings

Purpose

• +2% FMAP: States that spend less than 50% of Medicaid LTSS dollars on community LTSS

• +5% FMAP: States that spend less than 25% of Medicaid LTSS dollars on community LTSS

State Benefits

4

NWD/SEP System

Core Standardized Assessment

• Standard assessment instrument(s) used for a given population

• Captures domains & topics

Conflict-Free Case

Management

• Streamlined and

coordinated system

for eligibility

determination and

enrollment into

services

Three Structural Changes

• Separation between case

management & provision

of community LTSS

services

NW

D/SE

P S

yste

m

5

•State Medicaid AgencyOversight Agency

•Delegated by the Medicaid Agency

Operating Agency

• Aging and Disability Resource Centers

• Centers for Independent Living

• Area Agencies on Aging

• Non-profit organizations

NWD/SEP Network

NW

D/SE

P S

yste

m

6

• Composed of basic functional and financial questions

• Determines potential eligibility for community LTSS

Level I Screen

• Composed of a full functional and financial assessment

• Determines actual eligibility for community LTSS

Level II Assessment

Two-Stage Eligibility Determination

7

Website

1-800 Number

• Links individual to a NWD/SEP for information and Level I screen

NWD/SEP Physical Location

• Contains information

about community

LTSS, 1-800 number,

and location of

NWD/SEPs

• Ideally, provides

Level I self-screen

Entry Points

• Staff conduct Level I

screen and coordinate

Level II assessment

NWD/SEP

System

8

Determine eligibility

Determine support needs

Inform service

planning

Three Goals

Core

Standardized

Assessment

9

Three Goals of the CSA

1. Activities of Daily Living

Eating ToiletingBathing MobilityDressing PositioningHygiene Transferring

2. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

Preparing Meals TransportationHousework ShoppingManaging MoneyTelephone UseManaging Medication

3. Medical Conditions/Diagnoses

4. Cognitive Functioning/ Memory

Diagnoses tied to CognitiveFunctionMemoryJudgment/Decision-Making

5. Behavior Concerns

Injurious UncooperativeDestructive Other SeriousSocially Offensive

CSA Must Capture Domains and Topics

Conflict-Free Case Management

10

Separation of case management from direct

service provision

Separation of eligibility determination from

direct service provision

Individuals performing evaluations, assessments, and plans of

care cannot be:

Related by blood or marriage to the individual or any of the

individual’s paid caregivers

Financially responsible for the individual

Empowered to make financial or health-related decisions on

behalf of the individual

Presentation Outline

11

1. Overview of the Program

2. Applying to the Program

3. Reporting Requirements

4. Frequently Asked Questions

12

Application

Work Plan

• States must submit a Work Plan six months after submitting the application

Technical Assistance

• CMS and contractors will provide technical assistance to States

Applying to the

Program

• States submit

applications on a

rolling basis though

August 1, 2014 or

$3 billion exhausted

Work Plan (Page 59 of Manual)

13

Category Major Objective / Interim TasksDue Date (from time

of Work Plan submission)

Lead Person Status of Task Deliverables

Gen

eral

NW

D/S

EP

Str

uct

ure All individuals receive standardized information and experience the same eligibility determination and enrollment

processes.Develop standardized informational materials that NWD/SEPs provide to individuals

3 months Informational materials

Train all participating agencies/staff on eligibility determination and enrollment processes

18 months Training agenda and schedule

A single eligibility coordinator, “case management system,” or otherwise coordinated process guides the individual through the entire functional and financial eligibility determination process. Functional and financial assessment data or results are accessible to NWD/SEP staff so that eligibility determination and access to services can occur in a timely fashion. (The timing below corresponds to a system with an automated Level I screen, an automated Level II assessment and an automated case management system. NWD/SEP systems based on paper processes should require less time.)

Design system (initial overview)

0 months (submit with Work Plan)

Description of the system

Design system (final detailed design)

6 months Detailed technical specifications of system

Select vendor (if automated) 12 months Vendor name and qualifications

Implement and test system 18 months Description of pilot roll-out

System goes live 24 months Memo indicating system is fully operational

System updates Semiannual after 24 months

Description of successes and challenges

Completing the Work Plan

14

1. Review/modify tasks

2. Change # of months to actual dates

3. Add lead person

4. Add status (i.e., not started, in progress, finished)

Deliverables Due with Work Plan

15

1. Initial Overview of NWD/SEP System

2. Name of Operating Agency and NWD/SEP types

3. Completed CDS Crosswalk

4. Description of case management and potential conflict

6. Data collection protocols

7. Sources of funding to implement structural changes

Presentation Outline

16

1. Overview of the Program

3. Reporting Requirements

2. Applying to the Program

4. Frequently Asked Questions

Quart

erl

y R

eport

s

17

• Provides information on share of LTSS dollars spent on community LTSS

• Allows CMS to monitor progress toward community LTSS targets

Form CMS-64

• Submitted online

• Includes Work Plan deliverables with a summary sheet

• Allows CMS to monitor progress on structural changes and provide technical assistance

Progress Reports

Data

Coll

ecti

on

R

equir

em

en

ts

18

• All community LTSS at the individual level

• States should already have mechanisms in place for collecting these data (e.g., claims/encounter data)

Services Data

• Clinical measures that capture the extent to which service providers are supplying comprehensive, quality care

• Example: Medicaid Adult Health Quality Measures

Quality Data

• Measures of beneficiary and family caregiver experience and satisfaction with providers

Outcomes Measures

Presentation Outline

19

1. Overview of the Program

3. Reporting Requirements

2. Applying to the Program

4. Frequently Asked Questions

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

20

• How is a State’s eligibility for the Program determined? Question

• Share of Medicaid LTSS spent on community LTSS

Answer

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

21

• How was this percent calculated for each State?Question

• State Medicaid expenditures reported on CMS-64 from FY 2009

• You may: Request information on your State

calculations

Propose your own calculations

Answer

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

22

• When does the enhanced FMAP begin? Question

• The first day of the first full quarter after the application is approved

Answer

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

23

• Do rural areas with few providers have to meet the conflict-free case management requirements?

Question

• If a rural area has very few providers, the State must have mechanisms to reduce conflict, e.g., administrative separation and State and consumer oversight

Answer

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

24

• What about conflict-free case management in managed care environments?

Question

• If the managed care environment does not permit the complete separation between case management and service provision, the State must have mechanisms to reduce conflict, e.g., administrative separation and State and consumer oversight

Answer

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

25

• How can my State fund the structural changes?Question

• Enhanced FFP for Eligibility and Enrollment (E&E) Systems

• Money Follows the Person (MFP) administrative and savings funds

• ADRC grantsSee p. 44 of the Manual for more

Answer

Fre

quen

tly A

sked

Questi

on

s

26

• What can the enhanced FMAP be used for? Question

• “For purposes of providing new or

expanded offerings of non-

institutionally-based long-term

services and supports.”

Answer