ballast water management: a regulatory road map · lloyd’s register ballast water management: a...
TRANSCRIPT
Lloyd’s Register
Ballast
Water Management:
A Regulatory Road
Map
Colin Clark
Business Development
Manager, Atlantic Canada
Overview
• Environmental Focus
• Ballast Water Management
• The Challenge
• The Solution – Ballast Water Convention
• Evolution of the Convention – The D2 Standard
• Factors to Consider
• The Approval Process
• Post Installation Survey Certification
• Port State Control
• Conclusion
Focusing on the Environment
Exhaust emissions (PM NOx Sox )
Oil
Sewage (waste waters)
Garbage
Ballast water
Antifouling paints
Refrigerants
Fire-fighting agents
Ballast Water Management
The introduction of unwanted aquatic organisms via
ships’ ballast water is an internationally recognised
problem.
The effects these introductions of can have an effect
on human health, cause damage to local marine life
and local economies
What is the challenge?
Every year the world’s fleet moves 3 - 5 billion tonnes of
ballast around the world
Every day, 7000+
species of plants
and animals are
transported in
ballast
Every 9 weeks a
new species is
introduced
somewhere in the
world
Some Species Found in Ballast Water
Cholera Asian Sea Squirt & green
alga
Rainbow Jellyfish
Plankton
Mitten Crab Zebra Mussel
Why manage ballast water ?
Why have a ballast water convention?
European Zebra mussels cause an estimated $5bn
per year in damages in North America
International Convention
for the Control
and Management
of Ships’ Ballast Water
Adopted Friday 13 February 2004
The Solution:
When will the Convention enter into force?
The convention will enter into force 12 months after at least 30 States, the
combined merchant fleets of which constitute at least 35% of the gross
tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping have ratified the Convention.
As of 1 April 2012 there were 33 ratifications of the Convention representing
26.46 % of the GT of the worlds shipping.
Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Cook Islands, Croatia, Egypt, France, Iran,
Kenya, Kiribati, Lebanon, Liberia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Maldives, Marshall Islands , Mexico, Mongolia,
Montenegro, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Palau, Republic of Korea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sierra Leone,
South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic , Trinidad & Tobago, Tuvalu
What does the convention require?
All ships will be required to:
• carry out ballast water and sediment
management on all voyages
• have on board an approved ballast
water management plan and a ballast
water record book
• Ships of 400 gt and above subject to
surveys and certification
Ballast water managements options
Ships are permitted to discharge ballast only if
they have:
Carried out Ballast Water Exchange (BWE)
or
Used an approved ballast water ‘treatment’
system.
The convention is now shifting to a “treatment”
requirement
Practical Compliance Considerations
• Japan has estimated that approximately 62,000 BW Treatment
Systems will require fitting in this decade
• That number includes 1400 New buildings per year
• On average over 20 ships/day would need to be fitted to meet
compliance date
• If you consider new construction schedules, and phasing in of
requirements, largest chokepoint would be in 2017
• If assumptions hold, in 2017, 45 ships/day would need to be
fitted with BWMS
• The numbers alone are staggering, but what about
manufacturing capacity? Installation capacity and infrastructure?
Etc…Currently approximately 100 shipyard with capacity
Evolution of the Convention: The D-2 standard
Discharge less than 10 viable organisms per cubic metre
greater than or equal to 50 micrometers in minimum
dimension;
Discharge less than 10 viable organisms per millilitre less
than 50 micrometers in minimum dimension but greater than
10 micrometers in minimum dimension;
And discharge of the indicator microbes shall not exceed the
specified concentrations.
Treatment standard
Indicator microbes, as a human health standard,
shall include:
a. Toxicogenic Vibrio cholerae (01 and 0139) with
less than 1 colony forming unit (cfu) per 100
millilitres or less than 1 cfu per 1 gram (wet weight)
zooplankton samples;
b. Escherichia coli less than 250 cfu per 100
millilitres;
c. Intestinal Enterococci less than 100 cfu per 100
millilitres.
What do I have to do and when
Vessels constructed before 2009:
Ballast water capacity 1,500m3 to 5,000m3; Exchange or
Treatment until 2014; Treatment only after 2014.
Ballast water capacity less than 1,500m3 or more than 5,000m3;
Exchange or Treatment until 2016; Treatment only after
2016.
Vessels to comply by the first intermediate or renewal survey,
which ever comes first, after the anniversary date of delivery.
What do I have to do and when
Vessels constructed on or after 2009:
Ballast water capacity less than 5,000m3; Treatment only
Vessels constructed between 2009 and 2012:
Ballast water capacity more than 5,000m3;
Exchange until 2016; Treatment only after 2016.
Vessels constructed on or after 2012:
Ballast water capacity more than 5,000m3; Treatment only.
What and when?
Built BW M 3 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1500 -
5000 D1 or D2 D2*
pre 2009
*
<1500
>5000 D1 or D2 D2*
2009 <5000 D2
2009 to
2012 >5000 D1 or D2 D2*
2012 >5000
D2
D1 = exchange D2 = treatment * By the first intermediate or renewal survey after the date of delivery in 2014 or 2016
IMO vs USCG
• USCG Final Rule is expected to come into force 21 June 2012
• Current standard aligns with IMO until 2013, with potential deviation from 2013 – 2017
• Significant differences in Land-Based and Shipboard Testing Requirements
• USCG requires the following installation
• System to be approved by USCG
• Installation of approved system on existing ships during the 1st dry docking after 01 January 2014 or 2016 depending on ballast volume
• Installation of approved system applies to new vessels delivered from 01 December 2013
Ballast Water Treatment
• Must be safe (For ship and crew)
• Must be environmentally acceptable.
• Must be cost-effective.
• Must work
• Must be approved
Hydrocyclone
Treatment Processes
Physical solid-liquid
separation
Disinfection
Chemical Physical
Filter Chlorination De-oxygenation
Hydrocyclone Electro Chlorination Ultraviolet
Chlorine Dioxide Ultrasonic
Hydrogen Peroxide
Peracetic Acid
Vitamin K
Ozonation
Factors to Consider When Selecting a Treatment System
• Approval Status/Recognition
• Ship type
• Ballast capacity
• Space required (foot print and volume)
• Flexibility of location of system components
• Effects of pressure drop
• Approval Time
• Integration with exiting systems
• Certified intrinsically safe
• Power availability
• Chemical availability
• Availability of Installation Facilities
• Operations Interruption
• Health and Safety
• Effects on tank structure/coatings
• Availability of consumables, spares and support (servicing)
• Additional crew workload
• Crew training
• Capital and Operating Cost
• System availability – delivery time
• Water Conditions in area of operation
• Maintenance Requirements
• Treatment Time
• Future Regulatory Standards
Treatment System Availability
• Current state of the industry
• Approximately 50 available systems on the market
• Approximately 20 of which are considered “fully approved”
• 10-20 systems are currently at various stages of approval
• 500 installations worldwide
The Approval Process - The IMO Model
IMO Approval
Environmental
impact (G9)
Final approval Ship-
board
testing
Basic approval
Systems NOT
using an active
Systems using
an active
substance
System
Approval by
flag state
(G8)
Issue of type
approval
certificate by
flag (G8)
Type approval
certificate
Type approval
certificate
Land based
testing
IMO Approval
Environmental
impact (G9)
Land based
testing
Ship-
board
testing
Approval Requirements
• Treatment systems are required to be approved in accordance with IMO
G8 guidelines (MEPC. 174(58) or MEPC.125(53))
• If the system uses or produces an ‘active substance’ – the substance
must be approved (basic and final) by the IMO in accordance with the
IMO G9 Guidelines (MEPC.126(53))
• Currently 23 fully type approved systems in accordance with G8
available others expected in the coming months
Type Approval Process – USCG Model
• Land-Based Testing (ETV protocol)
• Shipboard Testing (STEP protocol)
• Environmental Testing – Shake, Rattle, and Roll
• Mechanical/electrical/engineering verification
Post Installation Surveys and Certification
International Ballast Water Management
Certificate
Valid five years subject to:
Annual surveys
Intermediate survey
Renewal survey
(Interim Survey guidelines in
BWM.2/Circ.7)
What will PSC be looking for?
What will they check?
The PSC inspection guidelines for the BWM Convention are still under consideration by the IMO, but are believed to align with current PSC activity.
• An initial inspection
• A detailed inspection if the are clear grounds the vessel is not complaint with the Convention .
• If the PSCO's general impressions and visual observations on board confirm a good standard of compliance with the Convention, the PSCO should generally be content with an initial inspection
• If there are “clear grounds” a more detailed inspection may be carried out
PSC inspections
Initial inspection will consists of a check for:
• A valid Certificate
• An Ballast Water Management Plan (BWMP) approved in accordance with
G4
• A type approval certificate for the BW treatment system
• A Ballast Water Record Book correctly completed
• Check of the onboard monitoring device
Plus may also include:
• For exchange a check of the salinity of random of tanks
• For treatment systems an indicative sample and analysis of the BW
discharge .
Conclusion
• Time is a critical concern
• D-2 standard implementation is imminent
• To avoid potential bottlenecking as implementation date nears,
engagement is essential
• Engage designers, manufacturers, regulators and class
societies
• The value of the system is only realised when it can be
demonstrated through a robust Type Approval process
Thank you
For more information, please
contact:
Colin Clark
Business Development Manager
Lloyd’s Register Canada Ltd.
45 Alderney Drive, Suite 812
Dartmouth, NS
B2Y 2N6