baltimore gas & electric company
TRANSCRIPT
IN THE MATTER OF
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Petitioner
: BEFORE THE : HOWARD COUNTY : BOARD OF APPEALS : HEARING EXAMINER : BOA Case No. 18-011C&V
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DECISION AND ORDER
On February 1, 2019, the undersigned, serving as the Howard County Board of Appeals
Hearing Examiner, and in accordance with the Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure, heard the
petition of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (Petitioner) for a new Public Utility conditional
use and two variances in an R-20 (Residential: Single) zoning district, filed pursuant to §§
130.0.B.2 and B.5 of the Howard County Zoning Regulations (HCZR).
The Petitioner certified to compliance with the notice and posting requirements of the
Howard County Code. The Hearing Examiner viewed the subject property as required by the
Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure. John Gontrum, Esq., represented the Petitioner. Emily
Ratzlaff, Robert Vogel, and Carl Wilson testified in support of the petition. No one appeared to
testify in opposition to the petition.
Petitioner introduced into evidence the exhibits as follows.
1. Emily Ratzlaff, resume 2. 1.8 - Conditional use and variance plan 3. Overall site plan, elevations of main entrance and service truck entrance, existing conditions 4. Elevations/images, main entrance and service truck fencing 5. Plan, existing and proposed fencing 6. Carl Wilson, resume
Page 2 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the preponderance of evidence presented at the hearing, the Hearing
Examiner finds the following facts:
1. Property Identification. The subject property is located on the north side of Ilchester
Road, about 289 feet west of Talbots Landing. It is located in the 1st Election District and identified
as Tax Map 0031, Parcel 557 and known as 5130 Ilchester Road (the Property).
2. Property Description. The 39.4-acre, irregular shaped Property has frontage on Ilchester
Road close to Talbots Landing with a long rectangular section running in a westerly direction
behind several residential properties fronting on Ilchester Road. The Property is currently
improved with a Public Utility Service Center comprising an office building, fleet service buildings,
outdoor storage, an electrical substation, and a Communications Tower. The 390-foot lowest
elevation lies along the north lot line. From here, the elevation rises to about 470 feet to the
south lot line along Ilchester Road.
3. Vicinal Properties. All vicinal properties are zoned R-20 and are each improved with single-
family detached dwellings.
4. Roads. Ilchester Road has two travel lanes and a 25MPH speed limit. There are three
access points to Ilchester Road from the Road: the westernmost “main” entrance/exit, a one-way
entrance across from Ilchester Woods Way, and a one-way exit just past transmission lines.
Technical staff reports more than 400 feet sight distances. There is no traffic data for this section
of Ilchester Road.
5. Water and Sewer. The proposed development will be served by public water and sewer.
Page 3 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
6. General Plan. The Property is designated as “Established Community” on the PlanHoward
2030 Designated Place Types. The General Plan's Transportation Map shows Ilchester Road as a
Minor Collector.
7. Zoning History.
BA 09-038C. Verizon Wireless, conditional use for a commercial communications tower granted by the Hearing Examiner on February 2, 2010, subject to the following conditions: 1) The Conditional Use shall be conducted in conformance with and shall apply only to the proposed monopole and equipment compound; 2) No additional lighting is permitted other than that required by the FCC or the FAA; 3) The monopole shall be grey or a similar color, unless the FCC or the FAA requires a different color; 4) If no longer used, the communication tower shall be removed from the site within one year of the date the use ceases. BA 91-03E. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Special Exception for an outdoor electric substation granted June 27, 1991, subject to the following conditions; 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all applicable laws regulations and guidelines, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to limitations on noise levels. 2. The Petitioner shall submit a Site Development Plan to the Department of Planning and Zoning within six (6) months of the date of this Order. 3. The special exception is limited to the installation and operation of the equipment as designated on the Petitioner’s Exhibit Number One, and not to any other buildings, structures, additions or uses; any other future transformers, capacitors, structures, additions, activities, or equipment not indicated on Petitioner’s Exhibit Number One are not approved and are not a part of this granted special exception. 4. The Petitioner shall comply with testimony presented and consult with the vicinal property owners to develop an agreed upon landscaping plan for the screening of the site; however, at minimum, the site shall be screened from the vicinal properties by a staggered line of evergreen trees at least six (6) feet tall to be planted and maintained for the life of the special exception along the northern and southwestern lot lines. For safety purposes, there shall be [a] break in the screening in front of the stormwater management pond, so as to create a line of sight from the office building into the stormwater management area. 5. The Petitioner shall comply with testimony presented and surround the proposed stormwater management pond with a seven (7) foot tall chain link fence topped with a [sic] one (1) foot of barbed wire; said fence shall comply with the Department of Public Works’ requirements for access to the stormwater management pond. 6. The Petitioner shall comply with testimony presented and paint the lightning masts throughout the site sky blue in color. 7. The Petitioner shall comply with testimony presented and paint the proposed facility and equipment therein a neutral, “desert tan” in color. 8.The Petitioner shall comply with testimony presented and limit the noise emanating from the facility to no louder than fifty (50) decibels at the property line.
Page 4 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
BA 570-C. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Permit to enlarge an existing electric service center granted July 24, 1968 BA 189-C. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Permit to erect a radio tower granted May 14, 1956 BA 183-C. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Permit to erect an electric distribution center granted March 5, 1956
8. The Conditional Use Proposal. Petitioner is proposing to substantially upgrade the existing
Public Utility Service Center by razing the site and constructing a new facility comprising a
27,994sf two-story office building, a 10,821sf two-story feet service building, a 11,284sf loading
dock, three outdoor storage areas, and a service building parking area. The conditional
use/variance plan is shown on pg. 7. The existing building to be razed was constructed in the
1950s and there have been no significant improvements since then. The redesign will relocate
any source of noise to be isolated from abutting and vicinal properties.
As proposed, the conditional use site (CUS) features two primary programmatic use areas
defined by two principal buildings located in the central portion of the Property. The first is the
proposed westerly 34’-high service center and office building and affiliated employee parking.
This area will be accessed from the westerly “main” ingress/egress. As seen on Exhibit 3, the two
principal buildings are designed with a softer, more institutional look to ensure compatibility with
the neighborhood. For this reason the fencing is this area was revised as shown on Exhibit 4 as
an open “picket” fence.
The second main structure/use is the 30'8" fleet service building and related service and
equipment parking. There is a dedicated and separate service ingress and egress for these service
vehicles and equipment.
Page 5 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
The two principal buildings/uses will be connected by a 26'-high, 11,284sf, covered
loading dock. Three dumpsters will be located on the north side of the loading dock. To the north
of the service center/office building is a dedicated area for an emergency generator and electrical
equipment. To the east and behind the loading dock are two proposed 19-foot covered parking
structures, which will be used in part to store BGE’s “bucket” vehicles.
The primary, loading and parking structures will be surrounded by the above referenced
parking lots and outdoor storage areas. The front section of the site will be enclosed by proposed
8'-high closed security gated fencing, except as noted above. The fencing in the rear portion of
the site will include a combination of existing fencing and proposed 8'-high chain link fencing. All
proposed fencing is shown on Exhibit 5. The conditional use plan includes a landscape plan
showing the requisite perimeter and internal parking area landscaping.
The existing uses will continue on-site and include general office usage, equipment
storage, and vehicular maintenance. Exterior activities to continue include loading of small and
large electrical equipment onto vehicles, parking and electrical pole/equipment storage. The
facility is a 24-hour operation with core business hours of 7am-3pm Monday-Friday. There are
120 employees reporting to this facility. Outdoor lighting will be motion controlled with 50%
normal state when vehicles are not circulating on the Property. Only one new light pole is
anticipated.
9. Requested Variances.1 Petitioner is requesting two variances: a variance to reduce the 50-
1 The Department of Planning and Zoning determined two variance requests (for gate control equipment and a fence) submitted by Petitioner were unnecessary.
Page 6 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
foot structure setback imposed by HCZR § 108.0.D.4.c(2) to 20 feet for eight-foot high security
fencing and a variance to increase the 15 feet accessory structure maximum height limitation
imposed by HCZR § 108.0.D.1.b to 19 feet for two accessory parking structures. The fencing is in
the same general location as the existing fence. The increase structure height variance is for the
Public Utility's “bucket” vehicles and taller equipment.
10. Emily Ratzlaff, project architect, testified about the conditional use site. Robert Vogel
testified about the proposed site plan’s compliance with the conditional use and variance
approval standards. Carl Wilson testified there are no issues with safe ingress and egress, given
the hours of operation, as employee and utility trips do not generally occur during peak traffic
hours.
Page 7 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
The Conditional Use and Variance Plan
LEG
END
PRO
PER
TY L
INE
EXIS
TIN
G T
REE
LIN
E
EXIS
TIN
G W
ALK
EXIS
TIN
G R
OAD
EXIS
TIN
G C
UR
BEL
ECTR
ICEX
ISTI
NG
8' H
IGH
CH
AIN
LIN
K FE
NC
E
EXIS
TIN
G B
UIL
DIN
G
PRO
POSE
D B
UIL
DIN
G
PRO
POSE
D8'
HIG
H S
OLI
D F
ENC
E
PRO
POSE
D C
UR
B
PRO
POSE
D S
HAD
E TR
EE
PRO
POSE
D E
VER
GR
EEN
TREE
PRO
POSE
D O
RN
AMEN
TAL
TREE
PRO
POSE
DM
ULT
I-STE
M T
REE
PRO
POSE
D S
HR
UBS
PRO
POSE
DG
RO
UN
D C
OVE
R
PRO
POSE
D A
SPH
ALT
PAVI
NG
PRO
POSE
D C
ON
CR
ETE
APPR
OXI
MAT
ELI
MIT
OF
DIS
TUR
BAN
CE
LOD
KERGER ROAD
ILCHESTER WOODS WAY
ILC
HES
TER
RO
AD (P
AVIN
G &
R/W
WID
THS
VAR
Y)
PRO
POSE
DSE
RVI
CE
CEN
TER
&O
FFIC
E BU
ILD
ING
HEI
GH
T: 3
4'-0
"
PRO
POSE
DC
OVE
RED
LO
ADIN
G D
OC
KH
EIG
HT:
26'
-0"
PRO
POSE
DFL
EET
SER
VIC
E BU
ILD
ING
HEI
GH
T: 3
0'-8
"
PRO
POSE
D
CO
VER
ED P
ARKI
NG
#2
PRO
POSE
DC
OVE
RED
PAR
KIN
G #
1
EXISTING
BUILDING EX.
BLD
G.
EXIS
TIN
GBU
ILD
ING
DO
NAL
D G
OW
L, E
MM
A G
OW
LM
AP 3
1, G
RID
15,
PAR
CEL
545
, LO
T 4
L. 0
1418
F. 0
0731
WIL
LIAM
SH
ARP,
MAR
Y SH
ARP
MAP
31,
GR
ID 1
5, P
ARC
EL 5
21, L
OT
1L.
032
27 F
. 001
05
TOSH
IHIK
O K
UN
IMO
TOM
AP 3
1, G
RID
15,
PAR
CEL
521
, LO
T 34
L. 0
2810
F. 0
0501
YASM
IN H
OLS
EYM
AP 3
1, G
RID
15,
PAR
CEL
523,
LO
T 1B
L. 1
4910
F. 0
0175
DO
RIS
BR
OO
KSM
AP 3
1, G
RID
15,
PAR
CEL
523,
LO
T 1A
L. 0
0437
F. 0
0138
JAM
ES H
ENN
EBER
RY
MAP
31,
GR
ID 1
5, P
ARC
EL 2
19L.
004
81 F
. 001
39
JEN
NIF
ER A
LBR
ECH
T,ST
EPH
EN A
LBR
ECH
TM
AP 3
1, G
RID
15,
PAR
CEL
218
, LO
T 1
L. 1
7129
F. 0
0417
MAN
MEE
T SI
NG
H,
HAR
PREE
T KA
UR
MAP
31,
GR
ID 1
5,PA
RC
EL 3
68, L
OT
1L.
172
67 F
. 004
21
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
W
OH
WO
HW
OH
WO
HW
OH
WO
HW
OH
WO
HW
OH
WO
HW
1112 1011
3
10
21
12
13
77
4
ON
LY
ON
LY
ON
LY
1411
11
8
1513
SGW
#1
SGW
#2
MB
#1
PRO
P.G
ENER
ATO
RSG
TT
SGLB
C
3
149
414
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA
PRO
POSE
D O
UTD
OO
R S
TOR
AGE
AREA
PRO
POSE
DEM
PLO
YEE
AND
VISI
TOR
PAR
KIN
G(1
22 S
PAC
ES)
PRO
POSE
DSE
RVI
CE
TRU
CKS
AN
DEQ
UIP
MEN
T PA
RKI
NG
PRO
POSE
DSE
RVI
CE
VEH
ICLE
SPA
RKI
NG
(25
SPAC
ES)
FUTU
RE
RO
ADW
AYR
IGH
T-O
F-W
AYD
EDIC
ATIO
N(W
IDTH
VAR
IES)
PRO
POSE
DSL
IDE
GAT
E
PRO
POSE
DSL
IDE
GAT
E
PRO
POSE
DSL
IDE
GAT
E
PRO
POSE
DFL
AGPO
LE
PRO
POSE
DSL
IDE
GAT
E
PRO
POSE
D8'
HIG
HC
HAI
N L
INK
FEN
CE
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
H C
LOSE
DSE
CU
RIT
Y SC
REE
N F
ENC
E
PRO
POSE
DO
UTD
OO
RST
OR
AGE
AREA
(CO
UN
TY O
WN
ED A
ND
MAI
NTA
INED
)
P-1
P-2
P-3
20' U
SE S
ETB
AC
K
50' S
TRU
CTU
RE
SETB
AC
K
VAR
IAN
CE
REQ
UES
TLO
CA
TIO
N B
VAR
IAN
CE
REQ
UES
TLO
CA
TIO
N A
VAR
IAN
CE
REQ
UES
T LO
CA
TIO
N C
10'
50' S
TRU
CTU
RE
SETB
ACK
10' S
TRU
CTU
RE
SETB
ACK
20' U
SE S
ETBA
CK
13'
17
4'±
4'
20' U
SE S
ETBA
CK
PRO
POSE
D S
ERVI
CE
VEH
ICLE
PAR
KIN
G
FUTU
RE
RO
ADW
AYR
IGH
T-O
F-W
AYD
EDIC
ATIO
N(W
IDTH
VAR
IES)
20' U
SE S
ETBA
CK
24'
30'
32'
21'
27'
23'
13'
EX. C
OM
MU
NIC
ATIO
NTO
WER
APPR
OXI
MAT
ELI
MIT
OF
DIS
TUR
BAN
CE
PRO
POSE
DFU
EL D
ISPE
NSI
NG
&FU
EL T
ANK
FAC
ILIT
Y
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
HC
HAI
N L
INK
FEN
CE
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
HC
HAI
N L
INK
FEN
CE
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
HC
LOSE
D S
ECU
RIT
YSC
REE
N F
ENC
E
EXIS
TIN
G F
ENC
E TO
REM
AIN
EXIS
TIN
G F
ENC
ETO
REM
AIN
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
H C
LOSE
D S
ECU
RIT
Y SC
REE
NFE
NC
E W
ITH
IN 5
0' S
TRU
CTU
RE
SETB
ACK
DR
IVEW
AY T
OEL
ECTR
ICAL
SUBS
TATI
ON
AR
EAS
DR
IVEW
AY T
OEL
ECTR
ICAL
SUBS
TATI
ON
AR
EAS
PRO
POSE
DD
UM
PSTE
RS
(3)
PRO
POSE
DSW
M F
ACIL
ITY
PRO
POSE
D E
MER
GEN
CY
GEN
ERAT
OR
& E
LEC
. EQ
UIP
MEN
T
PRO
POSE
DSW
M F
ACIL
ITY
EXIS
TIN
GG
ATE
EXIS
TIN
GG
ATE
PRO
POSE
DSW
ING
GAT
E
PRO
POSE
D M
ATER
IAL
STO
RAG
E BI
NS
(3)
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
H C
HAI
N L
INK
FEN
CE
WIT
H S
WIN
G G
ATE
PRO
POSE
DSW
M F
ACIL
ITY
PRO
POSE
DEN
TRAN
CE
MO
NU
MEN
T SI
GN
PRO
POSE
D IN
FILL
EVER
GR
EEN
PLAN
T M
ATER
IAL
EXIS
TIN
GEV
ERG
REE
NPL
ANT
MAT
ERIA
LTO
REM
AIN
EXIS
TIN
GEV
ERG
REE
NPL
ANT
MAT
ERIA
LTO
REM
AIN
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
HC
LOSE
D S
ECU
RIT
YSC
REE
N F
ENC
E
PRO
POSE
D 8
' HIG
HC
LOSE
D S
ECU
RIT
YSC
REE
N F
ENC
E
PRO
P. 2
0' P
UBL
ICW
ATER
& U
TILI
TYEA
SEM
ENT
PRO
P. 1
5' P
UBL
IC W
ATER
&U
TILI
TY E
ASEM
ENT
PRO
POSE
DFO
RKL
IFT
RAM
P
(3) I
N
(45)
JH
(2) C
C
(2) C
C (13)
FG
(1) A
RAG
(1) A
RAG
(1) A
R
(1) A
R
(1) A
R(1
) AR
(1) A
R
(1) A
R
(1) A
RAG
(2) C
L
(3) V
R
(4) I
N(2
) IN
(3) I
N
(4) I
N
(6) T
S(6
) TS
(3) T
S
(3) T
S
(7) C
A(7
) CA
(7) C
A
(7) C
A(1
) AA
(1) A
A
(1) A
A(1
) AA
(1) A
A(1
) AA
(3) C
C(3
) CC
(3) V
N(3
) VN
(3) V
N(3
) CC
(3) V
N
(7) C
S
(7) C
S(7
) CS
(1) C
CG
(1) C
CG
(2) C
CG
(1) C
CG
(3) S
J
(3) C
CG
(3) C
R(2
) AA
(5) V
R
1'±
1'±
1'±
4'±
4'±
VAR
IAN
CE
REQ
UES
T LO
CA
TIO
N D
20' U
SESE
TBA
CK PR
OPO
SED
8' H
IGH
CH
AIN
LIN
K FE
NC
E
PRO
POSE
D S
IGN
----
SHEE
T NUM
BER:
DRAW
ING
TITL
E:
DATE
ISSU
ED:
PRO
JEC
T NUM
BER:
PRO
JEC
T SET
:
CONSULTANT:
ALL
DRA
WIN
GS
ARE
PRO
TEC
TED
BY
FED
ERA
L C
OPY
RIG
HT B
Y M
AN
NS
WO
OD
WA
RD S
TUD
IOS,
INC
. AN
D C
AN
NO
T BE
REPR
OD
UCED
OR
MO
DIFI
ED IN
AN
Y M
AN
NER
WITH
OUT
WRI
TTEN
PER
MISS
ION
. D
OC
UMEN
TS M
AY
NO
T BE
USED
IN P
ART
OR
WHO
LE TO
DEV
ELO
P TH
E D
ESIG
N O
F A
NO
THER
BUI
LDIN
G W
ITHO
UT E
XPRE
SS W
RITT
EN P
ERM
ISSIO
N B
Y M
AN
NS
WO
OD
WA
RD S
TUD
IOS.
14315 Jarrettsville Pike, Phoenix, MD 21131-0249410.683.3388 www.siteresourcesinc.com
BGE HOWARD SERVICE CENTER5130 ILCHESTER RD, ELLICOTT CITY, MD
08/2
0/20
18
16-0
92
CO
NDITI
ONA
L USE
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC
NO.
DESC
RIPT
ION
DATE
10839-D PHILADELPHIA RDWHITE MARSH, MD 21162
MANNS WOODWARDSTUDIOSARCHITECTURE | INTERIORS | MASTER PLANNING
WWW.MWSARCH.COM(P) 410-344-1460(F) 443-403-2460
4 O
F 7
ILC
HES
TER
WO
OD
S AS
SOC
IATI
ON
INC
.M
AP 3
1, G
RID
15,
PAR
CEL
521
, LO
T 36
L. 0
2585
F. 0
0466
EXISTING
OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
TRANSMISSION LINES
CO
ND
ITIO
NA
L U
SE -
VAR
IAN
CE
SITE
ENLA
RG
EMEN
T PL
AN
SEE
SHEE
T 1
OF
7 FO
R O
VER
ALL
SITE
PLA
NVA
RIA
NC
E R
EQU
EST
CH
AR
T
LOC
ATIO
NVA
RIA
NC
E R
EQU
EST
AR
EDU
CE
REQ
UIR
ED 2
0' U
SE S
ETBA
CK
FRO
M T
HE
SID
E LO
T LI
NE
TO 1
3' T
O A
LLO
W P
RO
POSE
D C
LOSE
D S
ECU
RIT
Y SC
REE
N F
ENC
E.
BR
EDU
CE
REQ
UIR
ED 2
0' U
SE S
ETBA
CK
FRO
M T
HE
FUTU
RE
PUBL
IC S
TREE
T R
IGH
T-O
F-W
AY T
O 1
7' T
O A
LLO
W P
RO
POSE
D D
RIV
EWAY
GAT
E C
ON
TRO
L EQ
UIP
MEN
T.
CR
EDU
CE
REQ
UIR
ED 5
0' S
TRU
CTU
RE
SETB
ACK
FRO
M T
HE
FUTU
RE
PUBL
IC S
TREE
T R
IGH
T-O
F-W
AY T
O 2
0' T
O A
LLO
W P
RO
POSE
D C
LOSE
D S
ECU
RIT
Y SC
REE
N F
ENC
E.
DIN
CR
EASE
TH
E 15
' MAX
IMU
M H
EIG
HT
LIM
ITAT
ION
FO
R A
N A
CC
ESSO
RY
STR
UC
TUR
E TO
19'
.0
1020
8040
120
SCAL
E: 1
" = 4
0'
NORTH
PLAN
TIN
G S
CH
EDU
LEKE
YBO
TAN
ICAL
NAM
EC
OM
MO
N N
AME
CO
MM
ENTS
SIZE
QTY
SHAD
E TR
EES
RED
SU
NSE
T R
ED M
APLE
ACER
RU
BRU
M 'R
ED S
UN
SET'
ARC
ON
SIST
ENT
HT.
& F
OR
M, C
ENTR
AL L
EAD
ER2.
5" C
AL.
AUR
OR
A H
YBR
ID D
OG
WO
OD
CC
G
6 8
UN
DER
STO
RY
TREE
S
SHR
UB
ON
E C
ENTR
AL L
EAD
ER, F
ULL
/HEA
VY8'
HT.
15JH
JUN
IPER
US
HO
RIZ
ON
TALI
S 'W
ILTO
NII'
GR
OU
ND
CO
VER
BLU
E R
UG
JU
NIP
ERC
ON
SIST
ENT
FOR
M, F
ULL
/HEA
VY#1
CO
N
SPAC
ING
AS S
HO
WN
AS S
HO
WN
24" O
.C.
ARM
STR
ON
G G
OLD
RED
MAP
LEAC
ER R
UBR
UM
'AR
MST
RO
NG
GO
LD'
ARAG
CO
NSI
STEN
T H
T. &
FO
RM
, CEN
TRAL
LEA
DER
2.5"
CAL
.3
AS S
HO
WN
CO
RN
US
X 'R
UTG
AN' (
AUR
OR
A®)
CR
3O
NE
CEN
TRAL
LEA
DER
, FU
LL/H
EAVY
8' H
T.AS
SH
OW
N
AUTU
MN
BR
ILLI
ANC
E SE
RVI
CEB
ERR
YAM
ELAN
CH
IER
X G
RAN
DIF
LOR
A 'A
UTU
MN
BR
ILLI
ANC
E'AA
8M
ULT
I-STE
M, 3
-5 S
TEM
S, C
ON
SIST
ENT
FOR
M
8' H
T.AS
SH
OW
NEA
STER
N R
EDBU
DC
ERC
IS C
ANAD
ENSI
SC
C13
8' H
T.AS
SH
OW
N
21C
SC
OR
NU
S SE
RIC
EA 'F
LAVI
RAM
EA'
YELL
OW
TW
IG D
OG
WO
OD
CO
NSI
STEN
T FO
RM
, FU
LL/H
EAVY
AS S
HO
WN
28C
AC
LETH
RA
ALN
IFO
LIA
'RU
BY S
PIC
E'R
UBY
SPI
CE
CLE
THR
AC
ON
SIST
ENT
FOR
M, F
ULL
/HEA
VY24
"-30"
HT
AS S
HO
WN
ON
E C
ENTR
AL L
EAD
ER, F
ULL
/HEA
VY
CR
ATEG
US
CR
USG
ALLI
'IN
ERM
IS'
THO
RN
LESS
CO
CKS
PUR
HAW
THO
RN
JAPA
NES
E SN
OW
BELL
STYR
AX J
APO
NIC
ASJ
38'
HT.
AS S
HO
WN
ON
E C
ENTR
AL L
EAD
ER, F
ULL
/HEA
VY
EVER
GR
EEN
TR
EES
NEL
LIE
STEV
ENS
HO
LLY
ILEX
X N
ELLI
E R
. STE
VEN
SIN
CO
NSI
STEN
T H
T. &
FO
RM
, CEN
TRAL
LEA
DER
8' H
T.16
AS S
HO
WN
GR
EEN
GIA
NT
ARBO
RVI
TAE
THU
JA S
TAN
DIS
HI X
PLI
CAT
A 'G
REE
N G
IAN
T'TS
CO
NSI
STEN
T H
T. &
FO
RM
, CEN
TRAL
LEA
DER
8' H
T.18
AS S
HO
WN
LEYL
AND
CYP
RES
SC
UPP
RES
SOC
YPAR
IS L
EYLA
ND
IC
LC
ON
SIST
ENT
HT.
& F
OR
M, C
ENTR
AL L
EAD
ER8'
HT.
2AS
SH
OW
N
13FG
FOTH
ERG
ILLA
GAR
DEN
IID
WAR
F FO
THER
GIL
LA
CO
NSI
STEN
T FO
RM
, FU
LL/H
EAVY
AS S
HO
WN
12VR
VIBU
RN
UM
NU
DU
M 'W
INTE
RTH
UR
'W
INTE
RTH
UR
VIB
UR
NU
MC
ON
SIST
ENT
FOR
M, F
ULL
/HEA
VY4-
6' H
TAS
SH
OW
N
24"-3
0" H
T24
"-30"
HT
8VR
VIBU
RN
UM
X R
HYT
IDO
PHYL
LUM
'ALL
EGH
ANY'
LEAT
HER
LEAF
VIB
UR
NU
MC
ON
SIST
ENT
FOR
M, F
ULL
/HEA
VYAS
SH
OW
N4-
6' H
T
SCH
EDU
LE A
- PE
RIM
ETER
LA
ND
SCA
PE E
DG
E
PER
IMET
ERC
ATE
GO
RY
PRO
PER
TIES
/ R
OA
DW
AYS
LAN
DSC
APE
EDG
E TY
PE
LIN
EAR
FEE
T O
FR
OA
DW
AY
FRO
NTA
GE/
PER
IMET
ER
CR
EDIT
FO
R E
XIST
ING
VEG
ETA
TIO
N (Y
ES, N
O,
LIN
EAR
FEE
T)
CR
EDIT
FO
RPR
OPO
SED
8' H
IGH
CLO
SED
SEC
UR
ITY
SCR
EEN
FEN
CE
(YES
,N
O, L
INEA
R F
EET)
*
SHA
DE
TREE
SR
EQU
IRED
C (1
:40)
E (1
:40)
EVER
GR
EEN
TREE
SR
EQU
IRED
C (1
:20)
SHR
UB
SR
EQU
IRED
TYPE
E (1
:4)
SHA
DE
TREE
SPR
OVI
DED
EVER
GR
EEN
TREE
SPR
OVI
DED
(2:1
SU
B)
SHR
UB
SPR
OVI
DED
(10:
1 SU
B)
OTH
ERTR
EES
PRO
VID
ED(2
:1 S
UB
)**
P-1
NO
N-R
ESID
ENTI
AL T
O R
ESID
ENTI
ALC
282
LFYE
S, 2
21 L
FYE
S, 2
52 L
F0
00
02
00
P-2
PAR
KIN
G T
O R
OAD
E1,
321
LFYE
S, 3
61 L
FYE
S, 8
49 L
F3
028
034
823
P-3
NO
N-R
ESID
ENTI
AL T
O R
ESID
ENTI
ALC
397
LFYE
S, 3
97 L
FN
O, 0
LF
00
00
00
0
*IN R
EFER
ENC
E TO
HO
WAR
D C
OU
NTY
LAN
DSC
APE
MAN
UAL
CH
APTE
R IV
: OPT
ION
AL T
REA
TMEN
TS-E
REC
TIN
G A
FEN
CE,
HED
GE
OR
WAL
L.
**D
UE
TO T
HE
PRO
XIM
ITY
OF
EXIS
TIN
G O
VER
HEA
D P
OW
ER L
INE,
SM
ALL
DEC
IDU
OU
S TR
EES
ARE
PRO
VID
ED T
O S
ATIS
FY T
HE
STR
EET
TREE
AN
D P
ERIM
ETER
LAN
DSC
APE
EDG
E TY
PE E
PLA
NTI
NG
REQ
UIR
EMEN
TS.
STR
EET
TREE
REQ
UIR
EMEN
T TA
BU
LATI
ON
LIN
EAR
FEE
T O
F R
IGH
T-O
F-W
AY13
21
CR
EDIT
FO
R E
XIST
ING
TR
EE F
OO
TAG
E-3
61
RO
ADW
AY F
RO
NTA
GE
REQ
UIR
ING
STR
EET
TREE
S96
0
REQ
UIR
ED S
TREE
T TR
EES
32ST
REE
T TR
EES
PRO
VID
ED**
32
SCH
EDU
LE B
- PA
RK
ING
LO
T IN
TER
NA
LLA
ND
SCA
PIN
G
NU
MBE
R O
F PA
RKI
NG
SPA
CES
175
NU
MBE
R O
F TR
EES
REQ
UIR
ED9
NU
MB
ER O
F TR
EES
PRO
VID
ED(S
HAD
E TR
EES)
9
Variance request for 19' high accessory parking structures
Variance request for security fencing 20' from ROW
Page 8 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I. Compliance with the Specific Standards for Variances The standards for variances are contained in HCZR § 130.0.B.2.a. Pursuant to this section,
the Hearing Examiner may grant a variance only if the Petitioner demonstrates compliance with
all four variance criteria. Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, and for the reasons stated
below, the Hearing Examiner finds the requested variances comply with §§ 130.0.B.2.a(1)
through (4), and therefore may be granted.
(1) That there are unique physical conditions, including irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of the lot or shape, exceptional topography, or other existing features peculiar to the particular lot; and that as a result of such unique physical condition, practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships arise in complying strictly with the bulk provisions of these regulations.
The first criterion for a variance is that there must be some unique physical condition of
the property, e.g., irregularity of shape, narrowness, shallowness, or peculiar topography that
results in a practical difficulty in complying with the particular bulk zoning regulation. This test
involves a two-step process. First, there must be a finding that the property is unusual or different
from the nature of the surrounding properties. Secondly, this unique condition must
disproportionately impact the property such that a practical difficulty arises in complying with
the bulk regulations. Cromwell v. Ward, 102 Md. App. 691, 651 A.2d 424 (1995). A “practical
difficulty” is shown when the strict letter of the zoning regulation would “unreasonably prevent
the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity with
such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome.” Anderson v. Board of Appeals, Town of Chesapeake
Beach, 22 Md. App. 28, 322 A.2d 220 (1974).
With respect to the first prong of the variance test, the Maryland courts have defined
Page 9 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
“uniqueness” thus.
In the zoning context, the ‘unique’ aspect of a variance requirement does not refer to the extent of improvements upon the property, or upon neighboring property. ‘Uniqueness’ of a property for zoning purposes requires that the subject property have an inherent characteristic not shared by other properties in the area, i.e., its shape, topography, subsurface condition, environmental factors, historical significance, access or non-access to navigable waters, practical restrictions imposed by abutting properties (such as obstructions) or other similar restrictions. In respect to structures, it would relate to characteristics as unusual architectural aspects and bearing or party walls. North v. St. Mary’s County, 99 Md. App. 502, 514, 638 A.2d 1175 (1994) (italics added).
In this petition, the Property is irregularly shaped. This is a unique physical condition of the
Property causing practical difficulty in complying strictly with the setback regulations in
accordance with HCZR § 130.B.2.a(1).
(2) That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the lot is located; will not substantially impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property; and will not be detrimental to the public welfare.
The requested variances are to reduce the 50-foot structure setback imposed by HCZR §
108.0.D.4.c(2) to 20 feet for eight-foot high security fencing and to increase the 15-foot accessory
structure maximum height limitation imposed by HCZR § 108.0.D.1.b to 19 feet for two accessory
parking structures. The fencing is in the same general location as existing fencing. The increased
structure height variance is for BGE’s “bucket” and other equipment and the proposed structures
will be located some distance from area roads and neighboring residential uses and buffered by
existing and proposed landscaping and the primary building. The requested variances will not
alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district or impair the use of development of
adjacent property. The petition complies with § 130.0.B.2.a(2).
(3) That such practical difficulties or hardships have not been created by the owner provided, however, that where all other required findings are made, the purchase of a lot subject to the restrictions sought to be varied shall not itself constitute a self-created hardship.
Page 10 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
The Petitioner did not create the practical difficulties, in accordance with § 130.0.B.2.a(3).
(4) That within the intent and purpose of these regulations, the variance, if granted, is the minimum necessary to afford relief.
The proposed variances are for a reasonable use of the Property, in accordance with §
130.0.B.2.a(4).
II. General Criteria for Conditional Uses (§ 131.0.B)
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Hearing Examiner concludes as follows:
1. The proposed Conditional Use plan will be in harmony with the land uses and policies in the Howard County General Plan which can be related to the proposed use.
There are no PlanHoward policies directly related to Public Utility uses. The 2013
comprehensive rezoning text, including this conditional use category, implemented the General
Plan.
2. The nature and intensity of the use, the size of the site in relation to the use, and the location of the site with respect to streets giving access to the site are such that the overall intensity and scale of the use(s) are appropriate for the site.
HCZR § 131.0.B.2 is an on-site evaluation of the proposed Conditional Use. The purpose
of the new conditional use plan and affiliated variance petition is to consolidate operations in a
single building and increase operational efficiencies. This Public Utility service center will
continue to operate at existing levels with no increase in the nature and intensity of use. Ilchester
Road, a Minor Collector, continues to provide access. The Property’s size is such that it can
accommodate dense landscaping and woods along multiple perimeters, an indication that the
size of the site can accommodate the nature and intensity of use. The nature and intensity of use,
Page 11 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
as well as the scale of the use, and the location of streets providing access, are appropriate for
the site.
3. The proposed use at the proposed location will not have adverse effects on vicinal properties above and beyond those ordinarily associated with such uses. In evaluating the proposed use under this standard, the Hearing Authority shall consider whether or not: Unlike §§ 131.0.B.1 and 2, which concern the proposed use's harmony or compatibility
with the General Plan and the on-site characteristics of the proposed use, compatibility with the
neighborhood is measured under § 131.0.B.3's six "adverse effect" criteria: (a) physical
conditions; (b) structures and landscaping; (c) parking areas and loading; (4) access; (5) impact
on environmentally sensitive area, and; (6) impact on the character and significance of historic
sites. These six adverse impact tests gauge the off-site effects of the proposed conditional use.
Inherent in the assessment of a proposed conditional use under these criteria is the
recognition that virtually every human activity has the potential for adverse impact. The
assessment therefore accepts some level of such impact in light of the beneficial purposes the
zoning body has determined to be inherent in the use. Thus, the question in the matter before
the Hearing Examiner is not whether the proposed use would have adverse effects in an R-20
zoning district. The proper question is whether there are facts and circumstances showing the
particular uses proposed at the particular location would have any adverse effects above and
beyond those inherently associated with such a special exception [conditional] use irrespective
of its location within the zones. People's Counsel for Baltimore County v. Loyola College in
Maryland, 406 Md. 54, 956 A.2d 166 (2008); Schultz v. Pritts, 291 Md. 1, 432 A.2d 1319 (1981);
Mossburg v. Montgomery County, 107 Md. App. 1, 666 A.2d 1253 (1995).
Page 12 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
For the reasons stated below, and as conditioned, the Petitioner has met its burden of
presenting sufficient evidence under HCZR § 131.0.B.3 to establish the proposed use will not have
adverse effects on vicinal properties beyond those ordinarily associated with a Public Utility
conditional use in the applicable zoning districts.
a. The impact of adverse effects such as, but not limited to, noise, dust, fumes, odors, intensity of lighting, vibrations, hazards or other physical conditions will be greater at the proposed site than it would generally be elsewhere in the same zoning district or other similar zoning districts.
There is no evidence of record regarding atypical adverse effects on vicinal properties
from dust, fumes, and odors, noise, or hazards. All lighting will be appropriately located and will
operate under motion controls with normal state to be 50% while vehicles are not circulating on
the Property. The site is designed to locate any noise associated with routine activity away from
adjoining and vicinal properties.
b. The location, nature and height of structures, walls or fences, and the nature and extent of the existing and/or proposed landscaping on the site are such that the use will not hinder or discourage the development and/or use of adjacent land and structures more at the subject site than it would generally elsewhere in the same zoning district or other similar zoning districts.
Petitioner is requesting a variance from the 50-foot structure front setback to 20 feet for
closed security fencing, which is partly designed as a 8-foot high picket fence for compatibility
with adjoining and vicinal residential properties. The 34-foot high primary service center/loading
dock/fleet service building is generally centered on the Property and meets the district primary
structure maximum height requirements. It will be buffered from vicinal residences by fencing
and landscaping. The requested variances for two 19-feet high accessory structures (covered
parking) will not atypically affect or discourage the development and/or use of adjacent land and
structures more at the subject site because of distance and their location on lower elevations,
Page 13 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
which will minimize their appearance. Fencing, existing and proposed landscaping are also
proposed. For these reasons, the Public Facility use will not hinder or discourage the
development and/or use of adjacent land and structures more at the subject site than it would
generally elsewhere in the same zoning district or other similar zoning districts.
c. The number of parking spaces will be appropriate to serve the particular use. Parking areas, loading areas, driveways and refuse areas will be appropriately located and buffered or screened from public roads and residential uses to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent properties.
HCZR § 133.0 requires 3.3 parking spaces per 1,000sf for office space and 2.0 spaces per
1,000sf motor vehicle service/repair (excluding service bays) and 3.0 spaces per service bay. The
CUS shows the require 122 parking spaces, as well as 101 fleet vehicle parking spaces. The three
proposed dumpsters will be located behind the loading dock to screen them from adjacent
properties and Ilchester Road. Parking will be appropriately screened and buffered from
surrounding areas by existing and proposed landscaping and fencing.
d. The ingress and egress drives will provide safe access with adequate sight distance, based on actual conditions, and with adequate acceleration and deceleration lanes where appropriate. For proposed Conditional Use sites which have driveway access that is shared with other residential properties, the proposed Conditional Use will not adversely impact the convenience or safety of shared use of the driveway.
The CUS shows three points of access. Carl Wilson testified the operational characteristics
of the use and hours of operation will have no impact on safe ingress and egress, as employee
and utility trips do not occur during peak traffic hours. There is good sight distance. There is no
shared driveway access.
e. The proposed use will not have a greater potential for adversely impacting environmentally sensitive areas in the vicinity than elsewhere.
There are no known environmentally sensitive areas in the vicinity.
Page 14 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
f. The proposed use will not have a greater potential for diminishing the character and significance of historic sites in the vicinity than elsewhere.
There are no vicinal historic sites.
III. Specific Criteria for Public Utility Uses (§ 131.0.N.56)
A Conditional Use may be granted in the RC, RR, R-ED, R-20, R-12, R-SC, R-SA-8, R-H-ED,
R-A-15, R-APT, R-MH, R-SI, I, R-VH, HO, HC, POR, CCT, B-1, B-2, SC, BR, PEC, PGCC, CE, TOD, CAC
and TNC Districts for the following public utility uses, subject to certain conditions:
a. Permitted Uses: (1) Utility substations. (2) Above ground pipelines. (3) Pumping stations and compression stations. (4) Telecommunication equipment facilities.
Although Petitioner is not proposing these specific uses, the conditional use request is for
a “Public Utility,” which can reasonably encompass uses and structures supportive of the electric
distribution center approved by the Board of Appeals in 1956.
b. Special Conditions: (1) The proposed location, design and method of operation will not have a detrimental effect on the privacy and quiet of the neighborhood and the safety of its inhabitants.
The operation has existed for many decades at this location. The new configuration,
location, design and method of operation will not change substantially. For this reason, there will
be no detrimental effect on the neighborhood.
(2) The design of proposed buildings and the landscaping treatment of the site will be in harmony with the area.
The proposed primary structure is designed to read as an institutional use from the street.
The simple covered parking structures continue some of the details of the primary structure and
feature. The existing and proposed landscaping will complement the area. Even more, as Ms.
Page 15 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
Ratzlaff testified, the proposed landscaping will not need pruning to protect the utility lines
running along Ilchester Road.
(3) The Hearing Authority may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards to minimize adverse effects on the character of the surrounding area, including requirements for soundproofing, for the construction of fences, barriers or other safety devices, for surfacing of access driveways, for shielding of lighting, and/or for landscaping or screening.
The Hearing Examiner commented on the excellent design and operational program of
the new Public Utility Use during the proceeding. This may explain why there was no community
opposition to the use. For these reasons, I see no need to prescribe any conditions or safeguards
beyond those proposed by Petitioner. The Petitioner is to be commended for the design.
(4) When approving a public utility use, in its discretion, the Hearing Authority may authorize future changes not requiring further Hearing Authority approval. Such changes shall be limited to the addition, relocation, or modification of foundations or equipment, or additions to existing buildings, within a fence line approved by the Hearing Authority.
For the reasons just discussed, the Hearing Examiner hereby authorizes future changes,
which shall be limited to the addition, relocation, or modification of foundations or equipment,
or additions to existing buildings, within the fence line approved through this decision and order.
(5) When approving a public utility use, the Hearing Authority may approve an accessory commercial communications tower to serve that use. No accessory commercial communications tower serving the Public Utility use is
proposed.
c. For a new public utility use, the use would be located on property which is not an ALPP purchased or dedicated easement property. An existing public utility is not required to comply with this criteria.
Technical staff reports the use is not located on property subject to an ALPP easement or
dedicated easement property.
Page 16 of 16 BOA Case No. 18-011C&V Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
ORDER
Based upon the foregoing, it is this 26th day of February 2019, by the Howard County
Board of Appeals Hearing Examiner, ORDERED:
That the petitions of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company for a new Public Utility
conditional use and two variances in an R-20 (Residential: Single) zoning district are hereby
GRANTED.
Provided, however, that:
1. The conditional use shall be conducted in conformance with and shall apply only to the proposed Public Utility use described in the petition, depicted on Conditional Use/Variance Plan and shown on all exhibits, and not to any new structures or uses or any additions thereto. 2. The Hearing Examiner hereby authorizes future changes, which shall be limited to the addition, relocation, or modification of foundations or equipment, or additions to existing buildings, within the fence line approved through this decision and order. 3. Petitioner shall obtain all required permits. 4. Petitioner shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
HOWARD COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING EXAMINER ________________________________________ Michele L. LeFaivre
Notice: A person aggrieved by this decision may appeal it to the Howard County Board of Appeals within 30 days of the issuance of the decision. An appeal must be submitted to the Department of Planning and Zoning on a form provided by the Department. At the time the appeal petition is filed, the person filing the appeal must pay the appeal fees in accordance with the current schedule of fees. The appeal will be heard de novo by the Board. The person filing the appeal will bear the expense of providing notice and advertising the hearing. In accordance with C.B. 51-2016, § 1 (HCC Sec. 22.902 - Computation of time), if the deadline to appeal is a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, or if the County offices are not open, the deadline shall be extended to the end of the next open County office business day.