bandwidth scaling in uwb communications dana porrat and david tse university of california, berkeley
TRANSCRIPT
Bandwidth Scaling in UWB Communications
Dana Porrat and David TseDana Porrat and David Tse
University of California, BerkeleyUniversity of California, Berkeley
Capacity of Fading Channels
• UWB over Multipath channel
• Combine Duty Cycle and spreading modulations?
• Theory– Kennedy, Gallager
1968
FSK + Duty Cycle
achieves
• Spreading Modulations– DSSS no Duty Cycle
zero capacity
Telatar & Tse,
Médard & Gallager, Subramanian & Hajek
How many paths in channel?
• Antennas separation up to 10 m, LOS and NLOS
• Strong paths counted: 60-90% of power
• Number of paths increases with Bandwidth
DSSS Capacity in Multipath Channel
• No Duty Cycle Telater & Tse:
• With Duty Cycle:
Capacity depends on scaling of number of paths with W
DSSS Capacity with Duty Cycle
• Theorem 1:
DSSS systems with duty cycle achieve
for
if
• Theorem 2:
DSSS systems with duty cycle, where the receiver knows the path delays achieve
for if
Parameters:W=10 GHzTc=0.1 msecTd=200 nsec
Why does duty cycle make a difference?
Because of the channel uncertainty penalty
Number of Paths
Dat
a R
ate
[bit
s/se
c]C(AWGN)
DSSS with Coherence Time Duty Cycle (LB)
DSSS with No Duty Cycle (UB)
Parameters:W=10 GHzTc=0.1 msecTd=200 nsecL=100
Duty Cycle for Spread Spectrum
Duty Cycle
Extremely Bursty:Infrequent Transmission
Not so Bursty: Transmit on 1 coherence time of 500
C(AWGN) D
ata
Rat
e [b
its/
sec]
DSSS Capacity (LB)
Duty Cycle for Spread Spectrum
Gain Uncertainty Penalty (UB)
C(AWGN)
Delay Uncertainty Penalty (UB)
Extremely Bursty:Infrequent Transmission
Not so Bursty: Transmit on 1 coherence time of 500
Duty Cycle
DSSS Capacity (LB)
Dat
a R
ate
[bit
s/se
c]Parameters:W=10 GHzTc=0.1 msecTd=200 nsecL=100
Duty Cycle for Spread Spectrum
DSSS with Perfect Channel Knowledge
Extremely Bursty:Infrequent Transmission
Not so Bursty: Transmit on 1 coherence time of 500
Gain Uncertainty Penalty (UB)
C(AWGN)
DSSS Capacity (LB)
Delay Uncertainty Penalty (UB)
Duty Cycle
Dat
a R
ate
[bit
s/se
c]Parameters:W=10 GHzTc=0.1 msecTd=200 nsecL=100
DS Spread Spectrum vs. PPM
Parameters:W=10 GHzTc=0.1 msecTd=200 nsec
Number of Paths
Dat
a R
ate
[bit
s/se
c]
PPM with Coherence Time Duty Cycle (UB)
C(AWGN)
DSSS with Coherence Time Duty Cycle (LB)
Duty Cycle for Two Modulations
Duty Cycle
Dat
a R
ate
[bit
s/se
c]C(AWGN)
Extremely Bursty:Infrequent Transmission
Not so Bursty: Transmit on 1 coherence time of 100
PPM (UB)DSSS (LB)
DS Spread Spectrum allows a lower duty cycle because it is more efficient spectrally.
Parameters:W=10 GHzTc=0.1 msecTs=Td=200 nsecL=100
DS Spread Spectrum vs. PPM
PPM: Low data rate per Tc has to transmit often Large Penalty
DSSS: High data rate per Tc Infrequent transmission Small Penalty
PPM Capacity with Duty Cycle
• Theorem 3:
PPM systems with duty cycle, where the receiver knows the path delays achieve
for
if
• Theorem 4 (inverse):
PPM systems with duty cycle, where the receiver knows the path delays have
for if
DS Spread Spectrum vs. PPM
0
?
DS Spread Spectrum PPM
WW
LL
• Spectral efficiency determines max number of paths that can be handled by system
• Delays known, gains unknown
The Message
• Direct sequence spread spectrum and PPM achieve the channel capacity for if there are not too many channel paths, because duty cycle reduces the channel uncertainty penalty
• In situations that require low duty cycle spectral efficiency is key