bank financing, institutions and regional entrepreneurial ... · new venture formation, we find...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Bank Financing, Institutions and Regional Entrepreneurial Activities: Evidence from
China
IFTEKHAR HASAN
School of Business
Fordham University
and Bank of Finland
1790 Broadway, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: 646-312-8278
E-mail: [email protected]
NADA KOBEISSI
Department of Management
College of Management
Long Island University-C.W. Post
700 Northern Boulevard
Brookville, New York 11548-1326
E-mail: [email protected]
HAIZHI WANG
Stuart School of Business
Illinois Institute of Technology
565 W Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661
Email: [email protected]
MINGMING ZHOU
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
College of Business and Administration
1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway
Colorado Springs, CO 80918
E-mail: [email protected]
Corresponding author. Please send all correspondence to [email protected].
2
Bank Financing, Institutions and Regional Entrepreneurial Activities: Evidence
from China
Abstract
In this paper, we empirically investigate the effects of bank financing on regional
entrepreneurial activities in China. We present contrasting findings on the role of quantity
vs. quality of bank financing on new small business formation in China. While we find a
consistent, significantly positive relationship between the quality of bank financing and
new venture formation, we find that the quantity of supplied credit is insignificant. We
also investigate the effects of institutional environment on new venture creation. We find
that both formal intuitions measured by rule of law and informal institutions measured by
social trust are positively correlated to regional entrepreneurial activities. We interact our
measures of bank financing with measures of formal and informal intuitions. Our findings
reveal that the institutional environment tends to supplement bank financing in the sense
that institutional environment have a strong effect on regional entrepreneurial activities
when local banking system is less efficient to screen and fund would-be entrepreneurs.
Keyword: New venture formation, Bank financing, Institutions, Rule of law, Social trust
3
1. Introduction
Entrepreneurship involves mobilizing resources in the formation of new ventures to
pursue opportunities based on commercializable innovations (Aldrich, 1990). There is a
growing sense among academic researchers that the U.S. economy especially benefits from
vibrate entrepreneurial activities, which also contribute to the rising leadership of U.S.
firms in high-technology industries. During the entrepreneurial process, resource
acquisition, especially of financial resources, is crucial for making an innovative idea into
a reality (Black and Strahan, 2002; Blinks and Ennew, 1997). When a change in the
technological regime necessitates the creation of new firms, this can happen relatively
rapidly in the U.S., where financial markets function efficiently (Acemoglu, 2001).
The role of banks in facilitating entrepreneurial activities as well as economic growth
has been well established in the existing literature (Guiso et al., 2004). Entrepreneurial
firms are generally small and depend heavily on the credit provided by local banking
systems for their start, survival and continuous growth (Cole et al., 1996; Guiso et al., 2004).
However, most of the research that investigates the effect of financial development or
banking systems on entrepreneurship focuses exclusively on countries in North America
and Europe (Black and Strahan, 2002; Blinks and Ennew, 1997; Bruton et al., 2008; Kerr
and Nanda, 2009; Wall, 2004). The exploration of related domains outside of these two
developed economic regions remains extremely limited. Therefore, it is our attempt to
contribute to the literature and provide new evidence by empirically investigating the
relation between banking institutions and entrepreneurial activities in China, one of the
largest and fastest growing transitional and emerging economies in the world.
4
Moreover, existing studies tend to resort to the quantitative side to measure the banking
sector in the economy, which emphasizes the role of banks in stimulating capital
accumulation. Compared with the environment in a developed economy, the banking
institutions in emerging countries are usually much more strictly regulated and their
lending businesses are heavily government-directed or are regulated by government
intervention (Manolova et al., 2008). More importantly, lending to small businesses
requires banks to rely more on “soft information” to make decisions whether to extend
credit to small businesses, because the “hard information” is difficult (or almost impossible)
to collect due to the small firms’ lack of bookkeeping or new establishment (Stein, 2002).
Given the complicated nature of the “soft-information” processing, a measure which is
purely based on the quantity dimension of banking practice (such as total bank loans or
credit supplies) is simply not sufficient or even appropriate to gauge whether banks are
optimizing financial resources in an economy. Therefore, it is a bit surprising how little
the existing literature interrogates the quality of bank lending matters for entreprenurial
firms; most studies view the issue as resolved upon receiving a measure of quantity.
Therefore, given the importance of qualitative dimensions of bank financing for new
ventures, and given the lack of documentation in the field, it is our intention to contribute
to the existing literature by capturing and examining both the quantity and quality sides of
bank financing, to documenting and compare their different effects on new venture
formation, and finally, to highlight the importance of these quality dimensions on the
success of new ventures.
Parallelly, another strand of research emphasizes institutional environment and its
effect on economic growth and financial development (Cull and Xu, 2005). The relation
5
between intuitional environment and financial system has raised much interests by
academics because better legal protection and institutions may lead to better outcomes for
the financial system (La Porta et al., 1998). It is crucial for policy makers, especially those
in emerging countries, to understand which factor matters more due the limited resources
and time constraints (Cull and Xu, 2005). Institutions set constraints on market
transactions and exchanges with better devised intuitional settings lowering transaction
costs and facilitating resource allocation. More recently, scholars have examined
institutional environment such as the legal and political conditions that support
entrepreneurial behavior, and encourage/discourage entrepreneurs’ risk-taking behavior
(Ebner, 2006; Eliasson and Taymaz, 2002). The institutional context defines and creates
opportunities (Baumol, 1990) by offering different payoffs to different entrepreneurial
activities. Consequently, facing different institutional environment, entrepreneurs with
different perception choose to bundle resources and pursue their entrepreneurial vision in
different ways. In this paper, we embrace the notion that difference in institutional
arrangements across regions, both formal and informal, can explain the regional difference
in the level of entrepreneurial activities.
Using country-level data, it is difficult to separate the effects of banking financing from
its associated institutional environment because external financing can be strongly
influenced by formal and informal intuitions (Johnson et al., 2002). Therefore, in this study,
we collect data at sub-nation level from different regions in a single emerging economy,
China, and construct a panel of 30 provinces in China over the period from 1998 to 2008
to ensure we have sufficient variations in both cross-sectional and time-series dimensions
to explore our research question. From various sources, we obtain information regarding
6
the number small businesses, and we consider both the births and deaths of small business
to construct our measure of the entrepreneurial activities in local areas. We further measure
both the quantity and quality of bank financing to examine the role played by financial
intermediations on regional entrepreneurship. Following existing research, our quantity
measure focuses on the size of the banking sector at the province level. Our quality
measure is derived from aggregation of bank-specific efficiency scores.1 We first estimate
both profit (cost) efficiency for each individual bank, and then aggregate the bank-specific
efficiency score into province level according to a weighed scheme. In the regression
analysis, we also control for the regional economic environment and demographic
information such as provincial population, foreign direct investment, GDP per capita, local
availability of trained human capital and unemployment rate.
We document a significantly positive relation between the quality of financing services
offered by banking institutions and entrepreneurial activities in local markets. To address
the possible endogeneity issue commonly found in this type of research, we perform our
analysis based on a system GMM estimator (Bond, 2002). The results are robust to various
model specifications and identification strategies. Our analysis also reveals that both
formal and information institutions matter for new venture creation. We further interact
measures of bank financing with measures of institutional environment. Our findings
indicate the both formal and informal institutions substitute the efficiency of provincial
1 In recent years, the concept of frontier efficiency has been widely applied and documented in the banking
literature. For example, Berger and Humphrey (1997) provide a comprehensive survey of 130 studies that
apply frontier efficiency analysis to financial institutions in 21 countries, and conclude that the efficiency
studies yield important implications for financial institutions in areas of government policy, research, and
managerial performance.
7
banking sector with intuitional environment having a stronger effect of local
entrepreneurship in areas with low bank efficiency.
This study contributes to the literature in the following ways. First, we add to the
existing literature novel evidence of the effect of financial institutions and entrepreneurship
in an emerging country. Our study makes an explicit distinction between the quantity and
quality of bank financing (Koetter and Wedow, 2006; Lucchetti et al., 2001), and
investigates the relative importance of enhanced efficiency of financial intermediations
over supplied credit in promoting entrepreneurship in the local areas. Our findings
emphasize the importance of bank efficiency in funding entrepreneurial firms and highlight
the function of screening and monitoring role performed by banking institutions. Second,
we shed further light on how institutional framework affect entrepreneurship (Acs and
Karlsson, 2002; Ebner, 2006; Eliasson and Taymaz, 2002). Lastly, we contribute to the
literature by highlighting the importance of social trust on fostering regional
entrepreneurship (Casson and Giusta, 2007)d.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces background
information on banking system and institutional environment in China and reviews related
literature. Section 3 details the data collection and our sample. Section 4 discusses our
identification strategies and reports empirical results. Section 5 summarizes and concludes.
2. Literature review
2.1 Background of institutions in China
2.1.1. Banking intuitions in China
8
Emerging economies are characterized by an increasing market orientation, and are
becoming major economic forces in the world (Bruton et al., 2008). The late twentieth
century has witnessed the transformation of numerous centrally planned economies around
the world into market systems. Among many emerging countries, China has followed an
incremental and experimental path to reform its economy and has achieved fast growth
rates for more than three decades (Prasad and Rajan, 2006). During the transformational
stage, credit markets and banking system in China play a major role in channeling crucial
capital from saving to investment. Meanwhile, the banking system has continuously
undergone significant changes due to policy shifts.
The Chinese banking system was established in the late 1940s and followed the system
of the Soviet Union. The central bank, the People’s Bank of China, was founded in 1948,
and took responsibility for currency issue and monetary control. The banking system
expanded by launching several large state-owned banks that took over lending functions
from the central bank. The Chinese banking sector was dominated by four very large state-
owned banks with about three-fourths of banking assets.2 Initially, these mega banks
mainly served as “conduits” for the government, rather than as commercial banks.
Competition in the banking sector was limited because banks were lacking in sufficient
incentives to make profits out of real business lending.
It was not until in the early 1990s that the central government began to reform the
financial system by separating the policy banks from commercial banks. The 1995
Commercial Bank Law of China officially states that the major objective of state-owned
2 The “Big Four” are Bank of China (established in 1912), China Construction Bank (established in 19544),
Agricultural Bank of China (established in 1979), and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (established
in 1984).
9
banks is to operate as commercial banks in accordance with market principles instead of
according with policy requirements. In addition, de novo banks were permitted to enter
into the market in the mid-1990s. In the subsequent years, a series of procedures were
taken to transform urban credit unions into commercial banks, grant limited licenses to
non-state commercial banks as well as foreign banks, and introduce standard accounting
and prudential norms. Additional changes were implemented after China’s entry into the
WTO in 2001, including the liberalization of interest rates and a relaxation of restrictions
on equity ownership (Berger et al., 2009).
The gradual reform of the banking system in China and various regulatory changes has
significantly increased bank competitions and bank efficiency. While a flourishing
entrepreneurship in the private sector has been significant to the economic development of
China, the role of the banking sector is still inconclusive in existing literature (Hasan et al.,
2009). Given the predominant size of the banking sector in China, it would be interesting
to examine both the quantitative and qualitative sides of Chinese banks and their effects on
entrepreneurial activities.
2.1.2. Formal and informal institutions in China
The development of the modern Chinese legal system starts after the Cultural
Revolution when members of the legal profession were rehabilitated and a new state
constitution that emphasized the rule of law was enacted. Starting from 1979 and most
intensively in the 1990s, numerous legislation designed to facilitate the transition to a
“socialist market economy” was enacted. Among these legal initiatives, the most important
ones include the General Principles of Civil Law (1986), Company Law (1993, revised in
2005), Labor Law (1994, revised in 2008), Securities Law (1999, revised in 2005),
10
Contract Law (1999), Patent Law (2001), Copyright Law (2001), Trademark Law (2001),
Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (2005), Property Law (2007), and Law on Scientific and
Technological Progress (2007). Administrative and judicial institutions to enforce the rules
have also been established.
As part of its economic and legal reforms, the ruling party has deliberately used
legislations and policy tools to facilitate innovation. For example, the Law on the
Promotion of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises was promulgated in 2002 and Law on
Scientific and Technological Progress promulgated in 2007 to legalize the systematic
public support for innovation. Other than the legal initiatives from the State, different
provincial-level People’s Congress and government are decentralized with power to enact
regulations and policies conducive to innovation in their own region.
In addition to formal intuitions (legal systems), informal institutions also play an
important role in economic transactions, especially when formal intuitions are weak and
defective. In this study, we focus on a particular type of information institutions, social
trust. Sociologist often view generalized social trust as a collective characteristic of social
relations (Bourdieu, 1983; Coleman, 1988) that is influenced and sustained by cultures,
communities and social institutions. In China, the history of the impacts of social trust on
economic development in China may go back as far as Ming Dynasty. The development
of social trust has evolved over time and become an important component of the informal
institutions. Social trust can be viewed as a form of social capital (guanxi) which facilitate
smooth market exchange, enabling better enforcement and development of public
institutions and stimulating productive collective action (Algan and Cahuc, 2010; Helliwell
and D.Putnam, 1995; Knack and Keefer, 1997; Zak and Knack, 2001).
11
2.2 Related research
Banks are essential for economic development in that they are a crucial device to
screen entrepreneurs and allocate financial and real resources in an efficient way
(Diamond, 1991). As Cole et al. (1998) report using the data from 1993 National Survey
of Small Business Finance (NSSBF 1993), banks provide more than 60 percent of small
business credit. The causal relation between the financial sector and economic
development has been well established in the literature (King and Levine, 1993), which
supports a premise dating back to 1934 that a sound financial system fosters economic
growth (Schumpeter, 1934). Most of the research has been focused on the role of banks in
accumulating capital, and has employed measures such as the ratio between liquid
liabilities of the banking system and GDP (Gertler and Rose, 1994), the ratio of domestic
credit to GDP (Rajan and Zingales, 1998), and the share of credit granted to the private
sector in ratio to GDP (Beck et al., 2000; Wurgler, 2000) to gauge the size of financial
institutions.
The purpose of this article is to examine the effect of bank financing on new venture
creation (Headd and Kirchhoff, 2009) given that entrepreneurs rely significantly on bank
financing to launch new ventures to pursue their entrepreneurial vision (Alessandrini et al.,
2009). We argue that there exists a dynamic interaction between entrepreneurial firms and
financial institutions (Peng, 2003). The decision to launch new ventures is a natural
reflection of the formal and informal constraints faced by entrepreneurs in the local markets
(Barney, 1991; Teece et al., 1997). Given the limited resources of the region in which
entrepreneurial firms are competing (Aldrich, 1990), young ventures tend to be rationed
and are subject to a screen for credit worthiness and future prospects by banking
12
institutions. Moreover, local banking development can affect firms’ innovative activities,
particularly for small firms and for firms in technology sectors (Alessandrini et al., 2009;
Benfratello et al., 2008). Consequently, the entrepreneurial orientation of would-be
entrepreneurs will be shaped by the practice of financial intermediations in local areas
(Tang et al., 2008).
Although the importance of bank financing for entrepreneurship has been highlighted
in the existing literature, very few studies make a distinction between the quantity and
quality of banking institutions (Koetter and Wedow, 2010; Lucchetti et al., 2001). In this
study, it is our attempt to emphasize both the quantity and quality aspects of bank financing.
In a Schumpeterian world, the quality of bank services should matter more than just the
quantity of financial intermediation for the economic development. Stein (2002) points
out that the key distinguishing characteristic of small business lending is the “softness” of
information generated in the decision making process. Banks have an informational
advantage in identifying entrepreneurs with the highest potential to promoted innovative
products, services and processes, and thus can nurture lending relationships with
entrepreneurial firms (Berger et al., 2005). Banks in the economic system function as a
certification to the quality and viability of entrepreneurial firms and increase their
probability of successful introducing innovation to the market (Lucchetti et al., 2001;
Stiglitz and Weiss, 1988). During the lending process, banks can economize on searching
costs and thus achieve aggregate savings (Allen, 1990). As both insider lenders and
delegated monitors (Diamond, 1984, 1991), banks have access to entrepreneurial firms’
information from the onset of a loan application, as well as from previous lending
relationships, and thus are able to provide more effective monitoring at a lower cost
13
(Roberts and Yuan, 2010). Therefore, the information advantages allow local banks to
alleviate free-rider problems arising from asymmetric information and may enhance
entrepreneurial firms’ innovation activities. In China, lending to small businesses is highly
regulated by certain quotas set by the government because all the mega banks are state-
owned. As a result, banks may fund only a fraction of entrepreneurial firms with promising
prospects, and have to terminate lending relationships with some small businesses. Such
practice in China can have negative consequences for the survival and growth of small
firms with high switching cost. In other words, capital infusion by banking institutions
itself does not ensure the flourish of entrepreneurial activities (Hypothesis 1). Instead,
bank efficiency, which measures the relative ability of banks to efficiently utilize their
resources to generate outputs, may play an even more important role in allocating loanable
funds to entrepreneurs. We posit that in regions where banks are relatively more efficient
at minimizing costs when searching for promising businesses and monitoring their lending
portfolios there will be evidence of better nourished entrepreneurship and more venture
formation (Hypothesis 2).
Another strand of research emphasize the importance of intuitional framework on
entrepreneurship (Ebner, 2006; Sobel and Hall, 2008). North (1991) defines institutions
as “the humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic, and social
interaction.” Appropriate institutional settings can significantly lower transaction costs by
specifying clearly the rules of game thus reduce uncertainty in market exchanges. For
example, in a system of well-defined and protected property rights, participants know in
advance the consequences of a potential transaction to some degrees, and are able to
capture the gains from exchange.
14
Institutions can be formal, such as the enforcements of investor protection and
property rights, which set constraints on market interaction and specify associated
consequences. In his influential paper, Baumol (1990) makes distinction among productive,
unproductive and destructive entrepreneurship. He argues that the relative payoffs
provided by the institutional arrangements of the society greatly shape the distribution of
entrepreneurship. The regional differences in entrepreneurial activities can largely be
explained by the difference in institutional environment across regions (Armington and
Acs, 2002; Eliasson and Taymaz, 2002). Therefore, properly devised institutional settings
can facilitate would-be entrepreneurs to pursue their entrepreneurial visions by launching
new ventures (Hypothesis 3).
Institutions can be informal, such as, customer believe and trust. Market transactions
and exchange depend on cooperation and trust, when participants face severe asymmetric
information and only have incomplete information. Even if there is proactive enforcement
of formal institutions by regulatory agencies, neither laws nor the government can
safeguard against the temptation to engage in opportunistic behavior that may result in the
failure of efficient resources allocation in the financial market. In such circumstances, the
transactions costs can be high, which necessitate other means to overcome the difficulty in
order to complete the exchanges.
In recent research, Ang et al. (2014a) bring the social trust perspectives in China in
the literature, and argue that social trust, as a form of social capital, is indeed an important
factor for investment. In this paper, we propose social trust is part of informal intuitions,
and it complements formal institutions when there are defects in formal institutions (Ang
et al., 2014b). Existing literature has documented the importance of social trust to various
15
economic and financial outcomes (Algan and Cahuc, 2010; Zak and Knack, 2001).
According to Guiso (2012), trust means that one person or group feels comfortable to place
resources at the disposal of another person or group with the expectation that there would
be a fair payoff even without any legal commitment from the latter. Using data from four
former Soviet republics (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine), Neace (1999) reports
that entrepreneurs unanimously claim that trust is the key factor to explain entrepreneurial
success. Therefore, we predict there is a positive relation between social trust and regional
entrepreneurship (Hypothesis 4).
While existing literature have documented that the development of both financial
sector and institutions affect entrepreneurship in a significant way, little is known regarding
the interaction between banking institutions and institutional environment (Cull and Xu,
2005). Research has found that both formal intuitions such as enforcement of intellectual
property rights (Ang et al., 2014a) and informal intuitions such as social trust (Guiso et al.,
2004) affect economic agent’s investment decisions and financial development. In this
paper, we argue the effect of bank financing will be stronger in areas with weaker
intuitional settings because banks have to allocate more resources to collect information to
identify potential small corporate customers with better prospects (Marquez, 2002).
Therefore, regions with efficient banking system are able to better nurture entrepreneurship
when formal or informal institutions are underdeveloped (Hypothesis 5).
3. Data and methodology
In a standard cross-country setting, it is very difficult to observe and control for the
set of social and cultural variables that potentially play an important role in affecting
financial intermediations. Moreover, because of the sampling procedure, researchers are
16
oftentimes forced to compare a large number of countries that possess dramatically
different legal systems and institutional settings, which play an important role in shaping
the practice of financial institutions (Manolova et al., 2008). For example, a bank’s ability
to force repayment and the cost of contract enforcement can vary widely across sample
countries. Therefore, cross-country comparisons are subject to “data comparability and
functional equivalence” (Sekaran, 1983). To reduce the sample biases, we examine the
role of bank financing in explaining entrepreneurial activities using provincial data in
China, which is one of the largest and fastest growing transitional and emerging economies
in the world. By using the sub-national level data, we are able to focus on both the quantity
and quality aspects of banking institutions in China, and we can largely avoid the data
comparability issue in cross-nation studies because many institutional factors — such as
diversity in historical experiences and cultural norms — are homogeneous for our sample
regions.
In this study, we use aggregate data at provincial level in China instead of using cross-
country samples, and construct a panel of 30 provinces (including four municipalities) in
mainland China from 1998 to 2008.3 The sub-national data we use in this paper allow us
to control for heterogeneity in historical experience and cultural norms (Hasan et al., 2009),
thus render some major advantages over cross-country studies in addressing the data
comparability issue.
3.1 Measures of regional entrepreneurial activities
3 There are 31 provinces (including four municipalities) in China. We have to omit one province (Tibet)
because of missing data. In addition, our sample period starts from 1998 because it is since then that China
began to report data on small businesses using on consistent definitions, which is discussed in more detail in
Section 3.1
17
Aldrich (1990) argues that there is a significant shift from “traits” approach to “rates”
approach in entrepreneurship research, the latter of which emphasizes the founding rates
of new businesses over time Firm birth rates are widely adopted in recent studies to
investigate entrepreneurial activities and the related determining factors (Francis et al.,
2008; Kirchhoff, 1994; Kirchhoff et al., 2007). However, another important aspect of
entrepreneurship has largely been ignored in empirical studies (Birley, 1986; Delacroix and
Carroll, 1983), which highlights the importance of firm death rates in subsequent new
venture formations. Given that environmental resources set a limit on population density,
entrepreneurial activities vary substantially in local markets because the number of
organizations competing for the same pool of resources is constrained. New business
founding rates can be affected firm death rates because resources may be available when
firm deaths dissolve and release them (Aldrich, 1990). Therefore, in our paper, we consider
not only the founding rates but also the death rates in order to capture the dynamics of
entrepreneurship in local markets.
The National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) provides various statistics on the
number of firms in different sized categories at the provincial level in their yearbook.
However, before 1997, the industrial statistics were based on types of ownership, and it is
not until 1998 that the calibration of industrial statistics was changed from the types of
ownership to the sizes of enterprises. Therefore, we are able to obtain aggregate
information at the provincial level on a consistent definition of small businesses after 1998.
And we define a measure capturing the net birth rate of new ventures in each province as
follows:
18
Net birth rate of new ventures it = %1001
1
it
itit
N
NN ...................................................(1)
We recognize that this measure is not perfect, but is the best available proxy to our
knowledge.
3.2 Measures of quantity and quality of bank lending
3.2.1 Quantity of bank lending
The reform of the banking sector in China began in the 1980s with an effort to
separate commercial banking from state budget allocation (Berger et al., 2009). The ratio
of total bank loans to GDP is commonly used in the banking literature as a proxy for
banking sector depth, which measures the role and importance of financial intermediation
in the economy (Berger et al., 2004; King and Levine, 1993a; Levine, 1997; Levine et al.,
2000). We obtain the regional banking loans data from the annual issues of the Almanac
of China’s Finance and Banking (ACFB), and collect GDP data from the annual issues of
China Statistical Yearbook. Following existing literature, we measure the quantity of bank
lending as the ratio of total loans outstanding at the end of the year in the balance sheet of
all banking institutions to total GDP in the region (termed as “total bank loans/GDP”).
3.2.2 Quality of bank lending
Prior studies have well established that bank efficiency better measures the quality of
banking lending because it is a more comprehensive measure than some purely balance-
sheet measures such as nonperforming loan ratio or loan loss provision ratio (Berger and
DeYoung, 1997; Berger and Mester, 1997). Therefore, we measure the quality of bank
financing using two metrics based on the stochastic frontier approach of bank efficiency
estimations from both profit maximization and cost minimization perspective. Cost and
19
profit efficiency measure how well a bank is predicted to perform relative to a “best-
practice” bank producing the same outputs under the same environmental conditions. More
specifically, we estimate efficiency levels first at firm-year level by specifying the
commonly-used trans-log functional form based on the stochastic efficiency frontier
approach (Berger et al., 2009). For convenience, we show only the cost function:
4
1
4
1
4
1
2
1
303 )/ln()/ln()/ln(2
1)/ln()/ln(
j j k l
itllitkitjjkitjjit wwzyzyzyzwC
4
1
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
33 )/ln()/ln()/ln()/ln(2
1
j l
itlitjjl
l m
itmitllm wwzywwww
+ year dummies itit lnln … (2)
where i, t index the bank and year, respectively, k = 1,…4 index the four output variables,
and δ j k ≡ δ k j. C represents the bank’s total costs. The inputs and outputs in the function
are defined in the following: four outputs including: y1 (total loans), y2 (total deposits), y3
(liquid assets), y4 (other earning assets); three inputs including : w1 (price of funds, i.e., the
ratio of interest expenses to total deposits), w2 (price of fixed capital, i.e., the ratio of other
operating expenses to fixed assets), w3 (price of labor, i.e., the ratio of personnel expenses
to total number of employees); and finally, one fixed input (z): total assets. We estimate
the cost function using the itit lnln as a composite error term, where the
itln term
represents a bank’s efficiency, and itln is a random error that incorporates both
measurement error and luck. In other words, a bank’s cost efficiency score is determined
by comparing its actual costs to best-practice minimum costs to produce the same output
under the same conditions using estimates of the efficiency factor itln , which is based on,
in our case, the assumptions of half-normal distributions, and is disentangled from the
estimated cost function residuals using maximum likelihood estimations.
After the firm-level bank efficiency is estimated, we aggregate it to the provincial
level by calculating the provincial level weighted average bank efficiency scores, where
20
the weights are the proportion of total loans by each bank to total loans in the province
(Hasan et al., 2009).4 More explicitly, we have
Banking profit (cost) efficiency j, t =
n
i
titjig1
,,, ......................................................... (3)
and
n
i
tji
tji
tji
L
Lg
1
,,
,,
,, ....................................................................................................... (4)
In equations (3) and (4), j indexes the jth province in our sample, and equals to 1, 2,…,
30. i indexes the ith bank in our sample, and equals to 1, 2, …, maximum number of banks
in jth province. t indexes year, and equals to 1998, 1999, …, 2008. gi,j,t indexes the weight
of ith bank in jth province in year t. Li,j,t indexes the total loans provided by ith bank to jth
province in year t. ti, is the efficiency score estimated based on equation (3) for ith bank
in year t.
3.3. Measuring institutional environment
Formal and informal institutions are measured at the province-level in this study and
are collected from various sources of surveys, yearbooks, and hand collections. The use
of province-level measures of institutions allows us to explore the heterogeneities of
regional institutional environment within a homogenous constitutional, cultural, and
historical framework that defines a nation (Cull and Xu, 2005; Hasan et al., 2009).
In this study, we focus on legal institutions to construct our measure of formal
institutions. La Porta et al. (1998) stress the importance of legal rules because the quality
of legal institutions determines how well investors are protected and therefore determines
the cost of financing, and plays play a crucial role in firms’ growth and performance (Beck
4 For details of the profit and cost efficiency estimations, please see Berger et al. (2009). For details of
aggregating the firm-level efficiency scores to the province level, please see Hasan et al. (2009).
21
et al., 2003).. While the law of property rights protection is enacted at national level in
China, the perceptions and enforcement of property right protection may vary significantly
across provinces because of local protectionism and the local quality of the legal
institutions. We use an index constructed by Fan et al. (2011) as a broad proxy for legal
institutions. Specifically, rule of law is a composite index measuring the development of
intermediary market, protection of producers’ legitimate rights and interests, and protection
of intellectual property.
Our proxy for informal institutions emphasizes social trust which is closely related
to the concepts of social capital and social network. However, social trust is more of a
macro measure that is inherent in the local culture and less subject to the endogeneity issue.
In particular, our measure of social trust is based on the China General Social Survey
conducted in 2013. In the survey, questionnaires were sent to more than 15,000 managers
from companies located in 31 provinces (response = 4,600). The level of provincial
trustworthiness assessed from managers’ responses to the question: “According to your
experience, could you list in order the top five provinces where the enterprises are most
trustworthy?” There are five choices for this question: “do not trust greatly”=1; “do not
trust”=2; “neutral”=3; “trust” =4; and “trust greatly”=5. We calculate a provincial-level
social trust measure by taking the average scores of this question at the provincial level.
3.4. Other control variables
In the regression analysis, we collect data from the annual issues of the Statistics
Yearbook of China to control for a set of variables capturing various aspects of regional
development that may affect entrepreneurial activities. To be specific, we measure the
natural logarithm of provincial population to control for the size of each province. Given
22
that foreign direct investment (FDI) may stimulate small businesses (Aitken and Harrison,
1999) or discourage entry of local firms (Backer and Sleuwaegen, 2003), we measure FDI
to GDP (FDI/GDP) to control for the possible effect of FDI on new venture formation.
Armington and Acs (2002) document the positive relationship between college graduates
and the number of newly formed firms. Following their method, we calculate the
proportion of population with college degrees, and use this to proxy for the availability of
trained human capital in the local areas. We also measure the real GDP per capita to control
for regional economic development momentum. In addition, we include provincial
unemployment rate as a control for local business environment. The inclusion of these
control variables are based on the natural link between broader economic development and
new business formation discussed earlier.
Table 1 presents the summary statistics and pairwise correlation matrix of the
variables used in regression analysis. We note that the average net birth rate of new
ventures is 7.4% with a standard deviation of 14.8% during the sample period from 1998
to 2008. We document that the ratio of bank loans to GDP (i.e., our measure of the quantity
of bank financing) is negatively correlated with net birth rate, while our measure of
provincial level bank efficiency is positively correlated with firm birth rate. In addition,
our measures of formal intuitions (rule of law) and informal intuitions (social trust) are
both positively correlated with net birth rate of new ventures.
[Insert Table 1 about here]
4. Empirical findings
While correlation analysis reveals certain patterns relating regional entrepreneurial
activities to bank financing, these results do not take into account potentially significant
23
differences in economic environment and other demographic characteristics. We employ
regression analysis to investigate the effect of both quantity and quality of bank financing
as well as intuitional environment on new venture formation while controlling for a set of
variables capturing various economic conditions in the local markets.
4.1. Basic regress relating bank financing to regional entrepreneurial activities
In this section, we report regression results relating bank financing to regioinal
entrepreneurial activities. Though we have a panel data covering 30 provinces from 1998
to 2008, we do not provide fixed effects regression results for two reasons. Fixed effects
regression rely on within group variations to explain variations in the dependent measure.
Nonetheless, measures of bank financing and institutional environment presents less
variation for a particular province over time, thus raise the issue of multicollinearity if we
also include state dummies in the regression analysis.5 Additionally, as Petersen (2009)
points out, estimates of standard errors by OLS with a firm fixed effect are biased when
the residuals are highly correlated over time within a cluster. Therefore, we instead report
results based on pooled OLS regressions with standard errors clustered by province. In
addition, we include year fixed effects to control for economic-wide shocks and timely
trends in all model specifications.
Table 2 presents regression results based on pooled OLS regression with clustered
standard errors by province and year fixed effects. In columns 1-3, the dependent variable
is net birth rate of new ventures. The result in column 1 reveals that the ratio of bank loans
to GDP is not significantly associated with the net birth rate of new ventures. We then turn
5 Note that our measure of social trust is a constant for a particular province.
24
to our measure of the quality of bank financing (column 2) and document that bank
efficiency of the regional banking system is significantly and positively associated with
new venture formation (p<0.01). In column 3, we enter both quantity and quality measures
of bank financing and only bank efficiency is significant. In columns 4-5, we include an
additional explanatory variable, the lagged net birth rate, to capture the dynamics in local
entrepreneurial activities. Consequently, the interpretations of coefficients of other
included independent variables are conditional on the net firm births in the previous year.
We find similar results as documented in columns 1-3. Taken together, the results indicate
that the quality of bank financing matters for new venture creation in local markets, yet the
quantity of bank financing is not.
At first glance, the results on the quantities of bank loans seem contradictory to
previous findings (Berger and Udell, 2006). Note that an important characteristic of
Chinese banking is that the majority of the loans were directed by the government toward
large and state-owned enterprises, which suffer from the soft-budget problem due to lack
of effective governance mechanisms. Our measure of the size of banking institutions is
essentially a measure based on loan size for which supplied credits to both large enterprises
and small businesses are included. Consistent with prior research on bank loans in China
(Aziz and Duenwald, 2002; Boyreau-Debray, 2003), our results support the non-positive
role of private debts on economic development. In addition, the findings reported in this
section are consistent with results reported by Koetter and Wedow (2010) using Germany
data, which emphasize the significant and positive role of quality measure of bank
financing on growth.
25
The "sound financial system" concept developed by Schumpeter focuses on the quality
rather than the quantity of financial intermediations that influences economic activities
(Schumpeter, 1934, 1939). We derive our measures of the quality of financial
intermediations to assess banks’ abilities to convert inputs into financial products and
services, and then aggregate the measures into regional levels to reflect the overall
efficiency of banking system in a particular province. Using information in column 2, we
estimate that, all else being equal, an increase in bank efficiency by one standard deviation
results in an increase of 3.6 percent of the net birth rate of new ventures, which is
economically significant. Our results reveal that improved quality of intermediation in a
bank-based economy helps to reduce transactional and informational costs in lending to
opaque corporate customers, and thus fosters new venture formation in local markets.
Regarding other control variables, we find that logged provincial population and
FDI/GDP are significantly positively associated with regional entrepreneurial activities.
[Insert Table 2 about here]
Different regions may possess different endowments thus present various levels of
attraction to entrepreneurship (Rajan and Zingales, 1998). Therefore, we partition our
sample according to net birth rate of new venture creations, and examine the effects of bank
financing on new venture creation in regions with active entrepreneurial activities (net birth
rate above median) and in regions with inactive entrepreneurial activities (net birth rate
below median). We report our analysis in Table 3 for two subsamples. Although the
quantity of bank financing appears to be insignificant for overall sample, it has a positive
effect of new venture creation in regions with active entrepreneurial activities (columns 1
and 3). In contrast, we find that bank efficiency, our measure of the quality of bank
26
financing, matters more in regions that are less attractive to would-be entrepreneurs
(columns 3 and 6).
[Insert Table 3 about here]
In the finance-growth literature, it is crucial to investigate whether the explanatory
variables can be treated as exogenous or endogenous in order to make causal inference
(Boyd and Smith, 1996). For example, Robinson (1952) argues that financial services are
provided as a reaction to the demand by the corporate sector (i.e., reverse causality), and
therefore, finance follows entrepreneurial activity. For another instance, it is plausible that
some unobservable factors are correlated with independent variables included in the model
specifications, especially when the unobservables are not time invariant and cannot be
accounted for by adding province fixed effects. To address the endogeneity issue, we
employ an alternative econometric procedure to instrument the independent variables that
are subject to the endogeneity problem. We use the system Generalized Method of
Moments (GMM) approach developed by Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and
Bond (1998) to analyze the dynamic panel data. By first-differencing both sides of the
estimating equation, we are able to remove the individual province fixed effects and reduce
the potential source of omitted variable problem. In addition, the system GMM enables us
to instrument predetermined and endogenous variables by their own lagged levels in order
to obtain consistent estimators (Arellano and Bond, 1991). The lagged dependent variable
is entered into the right side to capture the dynamic nature of entrepreneurial activities.
This method can mitigate potential problems of serial correlation in error terms and the
correlation between the lagged dependent variable and the error terms.
27
In general, we find that the results based on system GMM estimators are consistent
with our findings reported in previous section. The overall fit of the model suggested by
Wald test statistic (p<0.05) indicates that our model is well specified. Moreover, the
insignificant Sargan test further validates that the choice of instruments is appropriate. It
is arguable that lagged levels can be poor instruments of endogenous variables. The lack
of significance of first-order autocorrelation indicates some variables follow random walks,
and consequently, our approach will be inadequate for model identification. In addition,
the presence of significant second-order autocorrelation suggests some instruments are in
fact endogenous. We thereby report the Arellano-Bond tests for autocorrelation. As shown
in Table 4, the significant first-order autocorrelation and insignificant second order
autocorrelation indicate that our models are appropriate.
[Insert Table 4 about here]
4.2. Institutional environment to regional entrepreneurial activities
In Table 5, we consider both formal institutions (rule of law) and informal institutions
(social trust), and report regression results relating institutional environment to regional
entrepreneurial activities. In columns 1 and 3, we focus on the development of
intermediary market, protection of producers’ legitimate rights and interests, and protection
of intellectual property, and relate the legal environment to regional entrepreneurial
activities. In line with our expectation, we document a significantly positive effect of rule
of law on net birth rate of new ventures, and the finding is robust to both pooled OLS
estimation (column 1) and GMM estimation (column 3). Similarly, we document a positive
effect of social trust on new venture creation in columns 2 and 4. Our results lend strong
support to the notion that institutions, formal and informal, influence economic growth
28
through their effect on entrepreneurship. In addition, the persistence of regional difference
in institutional environment appears to explain a significant portion of variation in
entrepreneurship.
[Insert Table 5 about here]
4.3. The effect of interactions of bank financing and intuitional environment on regional
entrepreneurial activates
In this section, we consider the interaction of bank financing and institutions and
investigate its effect on entrepreneurship. We predict that efficient bank system takes the
major responsibility of channeling productive resources to entrepreneurship when
institutional settings are weaker in some regions. To test our hypothesis, in Table 6, we
enter our measures of bank financing and institutions along with their interaction terms in
the model specifications. We find the first-order effects of banking financing and
institutions maintain their sign and significance. The coefficients of the interaction term
between measures of bank financing and formal and informal intuitions have a significant
and negative sign. Consistent with our prediction, findings reported in this section indicate
that, to facilitate entrepreneurial activities, the screening and monitoring role played by
bank intuitions matters more in regions with more efficient banking system when local
institutions are underdeveloped. Thus, our results from an emerging country add further
evidence to the literature investigating the effect of intuitions on financial development and
economic growth (Ang et al., 2014a; Cull and Xu, 2005; Guiso et al., 2004)
[Insert Table 6 about here]
5. Summary and conclusion
29
Entrepreneurs have innovative ideas but lack capital, and tend to be commercially
inexperienced. Banking institutions play an important role in channeling resources to fund
would-be entrepreneurs and building up lending relationships with entrepreneurial firms.
This is particularly true in emerging countries when entrepreneurs are financially
constrained and have limited access to external financing, especially when they lack track
records or assets-in-place as collaterals. In this paper, we focus on a single emerging
country, China, to investigate the effects of banking system on regional entrepreneurial
activities. More important, we make a distinction between the quantity and quality of bank
financing and compare the effects of these distinct features on new business formation. We
further examine both the formal and informal institutions and their effects on
entrepreneurship because intuitions are equally important to channel resources to
productive entrepreneurship (Baumol, 1990).
Using a panel of provincial-level data from 1998 to 2008, we find that, overall, the
quality of bank financing matters more in nourishing entrepreneurship in local markets.
Our results indicate that in a developing economy, the efficiency of financial
intermediations can be extremely important in identifying new ventures with promising
prospects and help entrepreneurs to start their businesses. We further confirm the positive
effects of formal and informal institutions on regional entrepreneurship. Strikingly, our
analysis indicate that efficient banking system appears to complement development of
intuitions in the sense that, in regions with weaker institutional environment, the effect of
bank financing on net birth rate of new ventures is stronger.
30
Reference
Acs, Z.J., Karlsson, C., 2002. Introduction to Institutions, Entrepreneurship and Firm
Growth: From Sweden to the OECD. Small Business Economics 19, 183-187.
Aitken, B.J., Harrison, A.E., 1999. Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign
Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89, 605-618.
Aldrich, H.E., 1990. Using an Ecological Perspective to Study Organizational Founding
Rates. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 7-24.
Alessandrini, P., Presbitero, A.F., Zazzaro, A., 2009. Bank size or distance: what hampers
innovation adoption by SMEs? Journal of Economic Geography 10, 845-881.
Algan, A., Cahuc, P., 2010. Inherited Trust and Growth. The American Economic Review
100, 2060-2093.
Allen, F., 1990. The Market for Information and the Origin of Financial Intermediaries.
Journal of Financial Intermediation 1, 3-30.
Ang, J.S., Cheng, Y., Wu, C., 2014a. Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High-Tech
Industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics 96, 332-348.
Ang, J.S., Cheng, Y., Wu, C., 2014b. Trust, Investment, and Business Contracting Journal
of Financial and Quantitative Analysis forthcoming.
Arellano, M., Bond, S., 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo
evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic
Studies 58, 277-297.
Arellano, M., Bover, O., 1995. Another look at the instrument variable estimation of error-
components models. Journal of Econometrics 68, 29-51.
Armington, C., Acs, Z.J., 2002. The Determinants of Regional Variation in New Firm
Formation. Regional Studies 36, 34-35.
Aziz, J., Duenwald, C.K., 2002. Growth-financial intermediation nexus in China. in W.
Tseng and M. Rodlauer (eds.), China: Competing in the Global Economy IMF,
Washington DC. .
Backer, K.D., Sleuwaegen, L., 2003. Does foreign direct investment crowd out domestic
entrepreneurship? Review of Inustrial Organization 22, 67-84.
Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitve advantage. Journal of
Management 17, 99-120.
Baumol, W.J., 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. The
Journal of Political Economy 98, 893-921.
Beck, T., Demirgüc-Kunt, A., Levine, R., 2003. Law, endowments, and finance. Journal
of Financial Economics 70, 137-181.
Beck, T., Levine, R., Loayza, N., 2000. Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of
Financial Economics 58, 261-300.
Benfratello, L., Schiantarelli, F., Sembenelli, A., 2008. Banks and innovation:
Microeconometric evidence on Italian firms. Journal of Financial Economics 90, 197-
217.
Berger, A.N., DeYoung, R., 1997. Problem lonas and cost efficiency in commercial banks.
Journal of Banking & Finance 21, 849-870.
Berger, A.N., Hasan, I., Zhou, M., 2009. Bank ownership and efficiency in China: What
will happen in the world's largest nation. Journal of Banking & Finance 33, 113-130.
31
Berger, A.N., Humphrey, D.B., 1997. Efficiency of financial instutitons: International
survey and directions of future research. Journal of Operational Research 98, 175-212.
Berger, A.N., Mester, L.J., 1997. Inside the black box: What explains differences in the
efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance 21, 895-947.
Berger, A.N., Miller, N.H., Petersen, M.A., Rajan, R.G., Stein, J.C., 2005. Does function
follow organization form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks.
Journal of Financial Economics 76, 237-269.
Berger, A.N., Udell, G.F., 2006. A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance.
Journal of Banking & Finance 30, 2945-2966.
Birley, S., 1986. The role of new firm births, deaths, and job generation. Strategic
Management Journal 7, 361-376.
Blundell, R., Bond, S., 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel
data model. Journal of Econometrics 87, 115-143.
Bond, S.R., 2002. Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice.
Portuguese Economic Journal 1, 141-162.
Bourdieu, P., 1983. The Forms of Capital. in: J. G. Richardson (Ed) Handbook of Theory
and Research for the Sociology of Education (Westport, CT., Greenwood Press, 241-
258.
Boyd, J.H., Smith, B.D., 1996. The Co-Evolution of the Real and Financial Sectors in the
Growth Process. World Bank Economic Review 10, 371-396.
Boyreau-Debray, G., 2003. Financial intermediation and growth: Chinese style. World
Bank, Washington, DC.
Bruton, G.D., Ahistrom, D., Obloj, K., 2008. Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies:
Where Are We Today and Where Should the Research Go in the Future.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32, 1-14.
Casson, M., Giusta, M.D., 2007. Entrepreneurship and Social Capital Analysing the Impact
of Social Networks on Entrepreneurial Activity from a Rational Action Perspective.
International Small Business Journal 25, 220-244.
Cole, R.A., 1998. The importance of relationships to the availability of credit. Journal of
Banking & Finance 22, 929-977.
Coleman, J.S., 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal
of Sociology 94, 95-121.
Cull, R., Xu, L.C., 2005. Institutions, onwership, and finance: the determinants of profit
reinvestment among Chinese firms. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 117-146.
Delacroix, J., Carroll, G.R., 1983. Organizational and institutional environments in
ecological perspecitve: Findings from the newspaper industries of Argentina and
Ireland. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 838-873.
Diamond, D.W., 1984. Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. The Review
of Economic Studies 51, 393-414.
Diamond, D.W., 1991. Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and
Direct Placed Debt. Journal of Political Economy 99, 689-721.
Ebner, A., 2006. Institutions, entrepreneurship, and the rationale of government: An outline
of the Schumpeterian theory of the state2006. Journal of Economic Behavior &
Organization 59, 497-515.
32
Eliasson, G., Taymaz, E., 2002. Institutions, entrepreneurship, economic flexibility and
growth - experiments on an evolutionary micro-to-macro model. Economic Evolution,
Learning, and Complexity, 265-286.
Fan, G., Wang, X., Zhu, H., 2011. Indexes of Marketization in China. Publisher:
Economics Science
Francis, B., Hasan, I., Wang, H., 2008. Bank Consolidation and New Business Formation.
Journal of Banking & Finance 32, 1958-1612.
Gertler, M., Rose, A., 1994. Finance, Public Policy and Growth. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
Guiso, L., 2012. Trust and Insurance Markets. Economic Notes 41, 1-26.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., 2004. The role of social capital in financial
development. American Economic Review 94, 526-556.
Hasan, I., Wang, H., Zhou, M., 2009. Do Better Institutions Improve Bank Efficiency?
Evidence from a Transitional Economy. Managerial Finance 35, 107-127.
Headd, B., Kirchhoff, B., 2009. The Growth, Decline and Survival of Small Businesses:
An Exploratory Study of Life Cycles. Journal of Small Business Management 47, 531-
550.
Helliwell, J.F., D.Putnam, R., 1995. Economic Growth and Social Capital in Italy. Eastern
Economic Journal 21, 295-307.
Johnson, S., McMillan, J., Woodruff, C., 2002. Property rights and finance. American
Economic Review 92, 1335-1356.
King, R.G., Levine, R., 1993. Finance and growth: Schumpter might be right. Quarterly
Journal of Economics 108, 717-737.
Kirchhoff, B.A., 1994. Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism: The Economics of
Business Firm Formation and Growth. Praeger Publisher, Westport , CT.
Kirchhoff, B.A., Newbert, S.L., Hasan, I., Armington, C., 2007. The Influence of
University R&D Expenditures on New Business Formations and Employment Growth.
Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 31, 543-559.
Knack, S., Keefer, P., 1997. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-
Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1251-1288.
Koetter, M., Wedow, M., 2010. Finance and Growth in a Bank-Based Economy: Is it
Quantity or Quality that Matters? Journal of International Money and Finance 29, 1529-
1545.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1998. Law and Finance.
The Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155.
Lucchetti, R., Papi, L., Zazzaro, A., 2001. Bank's inefficiency and economic growth: A
micro-macro approach. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48, 400-424.
Marquez, R., 2002. Competition, adverse selection, and information dispersion in the
banking industry. Review of Financial Studies 15, 901-926.
Neace, M.B., 1999. Entrepreneurs in Emerging Economies: Creating Trust, Social Capital,
and Civil Society. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science 565, 148-161.
North, D., 1991. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Peng, M.W., 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management
Journal 28, 275-296.
33
Petersen, M.A., 2009. Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing
Approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22, 435-480.
Prasad, E.S., Rajan, R.G., 2006. Modernizing China's growth program. American
Economic Review 96, 331-336.
Rajan, R.G., Zingales, L., 1998. Financial Dependence and Growth. The American
Economic Review 88, 559-586.
Roberts, G., Yuan, L., 2010. Does institutional ownership affect the cost of bank borrowing?
Journal of Economics and Business 60, 604-626.
Robinson, J., 1952. The rate of interest and other essays. London: MacMillan.
Schumpeter, J., 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Schumpeter, J., 1939. Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sobel, R.S., Hall, J.C., 2008. Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Regional Differences in
Economic Growth. American Journal of Entrepreneurship, 66-96.
Stein, J.C., 2002. Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized versus
Hierarchical Firms. The Journal of Finance LVII, 1891-1921.
Stiglitz, J.E., Weiss, A., 1988. Banks as social accountants and screening devicies for the
allocation of credit. NBER working paper National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L.D., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., 2008. Exploring and Inverted U-Shape
Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Chinese
Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32, 219-239.
Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal 18.
Wurgler, J., 2000. Financial markets and the allocation of capital. Journal of Financial
Economics 58, 187-214.
Zak, P.J., Knack, S., 2001. Trust and Growth. The Economic Journal 111, 295-321.
34
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix of variables used in the analysis
This table presents the descriptive statistics and pairwise correlation matrix of the variables used in the regression analysis. Net birth rate is calculated as the percentage
changes in total number of small businesses (defined as firms with fewer than 300 employees). Bank Loans/GDP is defined as the ratio of total loans by all banking
institutions to total GDP. Profit (cost) efficiency of banks is the province-level aggregated number of firm-level bank profit (cost) efficiency. Rule of law is a composite
index measuring the development of intermediary market, protection of producers’ legitimate rights and interests, and protection of intellectual property. Social trust
measures the “generalized trust” at provincial level which is derived from the China General Social Survey in 2013. LogPopulation is the natural logarithm of
provincial population GDP per capita growth is defined as the real-term GDP growth per capita. FDI/GDP is defined as the ratio of foreign direct investment to GDP.
Proportion of population with college degrees is defined as the proportion of population with college degree or high education to total population above age six.
Unemployment rate measures province-level unemployment rate. All the variables are measured at province level.
N Mean St. Dev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Net birth rate 310 0.074 0.148 1.000
2 Bank loan/GDP 310 1.098 0.554 -0.027 1.000
3 Bank efficiency 278 0.453 0.068 0.013 -0.026 1.000
4 Rule of law 310 5.199 3.191 0.348 0.206 0.048 1.000
5 Social trust 310 2.977 1.095 0.239 0.204 0.026 0.718 1.000
6 LogPopulation 279 8.031 0.886 0.295 -0.197 -0.048 0.139 0.408 1.000
7 GDP per capita 279 0.109 0.049 0.251 0.000 -0.086 0.143 -0.017 -0.010 1.000
8 FDI/GDP 269 0.025 0.025 0.100 0.114 0.020 0.553 0.571 -0.036 -0.111 1.000
9 College degree/Population 279 0.059 0.044 0.128 0.439 -0.002 0.638 0.568 -0.205 0.094 0.324 1.000
10 Unemployment rate 279 0.093 0.048 0.067 -0.428 -0.073 -0.439 -0.538 0.290 0.045 -0.356 -0.839 1.000
35
Table 2. Basic regression relating bank financing to regional entrepreneurial activities
This table presents regression results relating bank financing to regional entrepreneurial activities. Net birth rate is
calculated as the percentage changes in total number of small businesses (defined as firms with fewer than 300
employees). Bank Loans/GDP is defined as the ratio of total loans by all banking institutions to total GDP. Profit
(cost) efficiency of banks is the province-level aggregated number of firm-level bank profit (cost) efficiency.
LogPopulation is the natural logarithm of provincial population GDP per capita growth is defined as the real-term
GDP growth per capita. FDI/GDP is defined as the ratio of foreign direct investment to GDP. Proportion of population
with college degrees is defined as the proportion of population with college degree or high education to total
population above age six. Unemployment rate measures province-level unemployment rate. All the variables are
measured at province level.
Independent variables Dependent variables: Net birth rate
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Net birth rate (lagged) 0.340*** 0.346*** 0.348***
(0.069) (0.073) (0.072)
Bank loan/GDP 0.007 0.006 0.003 0.001
(0.007) (0.008) (0.006) (0.007)
Bank efficiency 0.528*** 0.523*** 0.560*** 0.559***
(0.186) (0.187) (0.140) (0.141)
LogPopulation 0.035*** 0.034*** 0.035*** 0.025** 0.025** 0.025**
(0.010) (0.010) (0.010) (0.011) (0.010) (0.010)
Per capita GDP 0.270 0.239 0.241 0.228 0.195 0.195
(0.179) (0.168) (0.170) (0.157) (0.147) (0.148)
FDI/GDP 0.749*** 0.776*** 0.767*** 0.671** 0.681*** 0.683***
(0.242) (0.238) (0.242) (0.261) (0.262) (0.262)
College degree/Population 0.117 0.091 0.076 0.095 0.060 0.054
(0.302) (0.322) (0.322) (0.285) (0.296) (0.298)
Unemployment rate 0.171 0.145 0.156 0.229 0.215 0.216
(0.285) (0.291) (0.292) (0.287) (0.290) (0.291)
Constant -0.510** -0.745*** -0.763*** -0.449* -0.716*** -0.718***
(0.251) (0.265) (0.245) (0.259) (0.270) (0.269)
Year fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Clustered standard errors Province Province Province Province Province Province
Observations 296 296 296 269 269 269
F-statistic 12.88*** 11.84*** 11.93*** 12.88*** 17.50*** 16.66***
Adjusted R-square 0.410 0.425 0.423 0.480 0.496 0.502
Notes: Robust standard errors are corrected for province-level clustering and heteroskedasticity, and reported in
parentheses. *, **, and *** represent significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively.
36
Table 3. Bank financing and entrepreneurship: regions with active and inactive
entrepreneurial activities
This table presents regression results relating bank financing to regional entrepreneurial activities. In particular, we
partition our sample according to the new firm net birth rate, with regions with active (inactive) entrepreneurial
activities being those provinces having above (below) median net birth rate. Net birth rate is calculated as the
percentage changes in total number of small businesses (defined as firms with fewer than 300 employees). Bank
Loans/GDP is defined as the ratio of total loans by all banking institutions to total GDP. Profit (cost) efficiency of
banks is the province-level aggregated number of firm-level bank profit (cost) efficiency. LogPopulation is the natural
logarithm of provincial population GDP per capita growth is defined as the real-term GDP growth per capita.
FDI/GDP is defined as the ratio of foreign direct investment to GDP. Proportion of population with college degrees
is defined as the proportion of population with college degree or high education to total population above age six.
Unemployment rate measures province-level unemployment rate. All the variables are measured at province level.
Independent variables Dependent variables: Net birth rate
Regions with active entrepreneurial
activities: Net birth rate>median
Regions with inactive entrepreneurial
activities Net birth rate<median
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Bank loan/GDP 0.010** 0.010* -0.008 -0.019
(0.005) (0.005) (0.018) (0.017)
Bank efficiency 0.105 0.100 0.437*** 0.464***
(0.170) (0.169) (0.160) (0.164)
LogPopulation -0.000 -0.000 0.001 0.027*** 0.026*** 0.024**
(0.012) (0.012) (0.012) (0.010) (0.009) (0.009)
Per capita GDP 0.085 0.079 0.076 -0.076 -0.073 -0.066
(0.166) (0.164) (0.167) (0.113) (0.121) (0.124)
FDI/GDP 0.179 0.184 0.196 0.573*** 0.550*** 0.543***
(0.343) (0.347) (0.350) (0.194) (0.186) (0.189)
College degree/Population -0.146 -0.090 -0.148 0.213 0.140 0.206
(0.453) (0.460) (0.461) (0.279) (0.279) (0.275)
Unemployment rate -0.236 -0.234 -0.234 0.228 0.237 0.218
(0.398) (0.399) (0.400) (0.245) (0.241) (0.243)
Constant 0.323 0.273 0.264 -0.489** -0.719*** -0.674***
(0.374) (0.380) (0.380) (0.229) (0.225) (0.232)
Year fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Clustered standard errors Province Province Province Province Province Province
Observations 150 150 150 143 143 143
F-statistic 8.4*** 6.4*** 7.73*** 2.54*** 3.26*** 3.12***
Adjusted R-square 0.414 0.411 0.415 0.278 0.312 0.315
Notes: Robust standard errors are corrected for province-level clustering and heteroskedasticity, and reported in
parentheses. *, **, and *** represent significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively.
37
Table 4: Bank financing to regional entrepreneurial activities: Dynamic panel estimation
This table presents regression results relating bank financing to regional entrepreneurial activities using GMM
estimation. Net birth rate is calculated as the percentage changes in total number of small businesses (defined as firms
with fewer than 300 employees). Bank Loans/GDP is defined as the ratio of total loans by all banking institutions to
total GDP. Profit (cost) efficiency of banks is the province-level aggregated number of firm-level bank profit (cost)
efficiency. LogPopulation is the natural logarithm of provincial population GDP per capita growth is defined as the
real-term GDP growth per capita. FDI/GDP is defined as the ratio of foreign direct investment to GDP. Proportion
of population with college degrees is defined as the proportion of population with college degree or high education to
total population above age six. Unemployment rate measures province-level unemployment rate. All the variables
are measured at province level.
Independent variables Dependent variables: Net birth rate
(1) (2) (3)
Net birth rate (lagged) 0.336*** 0.345*** 0.348***
(0.055) (0.055) (0.055)
Bank loan/GDP 0.002 0.000
(0.006) (0.007)
Bank efficiency 0.615*** 0.604***
(0.191) (0.190)
LogPopulation 0.025** 0.025*** 0.025***
(0.010) (0.009) (0.009)
Per capita GDP 0.229 0.192 0.192
(0.163) (0.147) (0.147)
FDI/GDP 0.673*** 0.684*** 0.684***
(0.188) (0.176) (0.177)
College degree/Population 0.103 0.055 0.055
(0.198) (0.228) (0.232)
Unemployment rate 0.228 0.214 0.214
(0.167) (0.193) (0.193)
Constant -0.447** -0.743*** -0.744***
(0.174) (0.207) (0.208)
Year fixed effects Yes Yes Yes
Clustered standard errors Province Province Province
Observations 269 269 269
Wald chi-square 642.59*** 512.49*** 563.21***
Arellano-Bond test for AR(1): p-value 0.001 0.001 0.001
Arellano-Bond test for AR(2): p-value 0.595 0.558 0.561
Sargan test of over identification: p-value 0.234 0.33 0.314
Notes: Robust standard errors are corrected for province-level clustering and heteroskedasticity, and reported in
parentheses. *, **, and *** represent significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively.
38
Table 5. Regression relating institutional environment to regional entrepreneurial activities
This table presents regression results relating institutional environment to regional entrepreneurial activities using
both OLS and GMM estimations. Net birth rate is calculated as the percentage changes in total number of small
businesses (defined as firms with fewer than 300 employees). Bank Loans/GDP is defined as the ratio of total loans
by all banking institutions to total GDP. Profit (cost) efficiency of banks is the province-level aggregated number of
firm-level bank profit (cost) efficiency. Rule of law is a composite index measuring the development of intermediary
market, protection of producers’ legitimate rights and interests, and protection of intellectual property. Social trust
measures the “generalized trust” at provincial level which is derived from the China General Social Survey in
2013.LogPopulation is the natural logarithm of provincial population GDP per capita growth is defined as the real-
term GDP growth per capita. FDI/GDP is defined as the ratio of foreign direct investment to GDP. Proportion of
population with college degrees is defined as the proportion of population with college degree or high education to
total population above age six. Unemployment rate measures province-level unemployment rate. All the variables
are measured at province level.
Independent variables Dependent variables: Net birth rate
OLS GMM
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Net birth rate (lagged) 0.332*** 0.322***
(0.054) (0.055)
Rule of law 0.007* 0.006**
(0.004) (0.003)
Social trust 0.026** 0.019**
(0.012) (0.008)
LogPopulation 0.027** 0.012 0.019* 0.009
(0.013) (0.016) (0.010) (0.012)
Per capita GDP 0.278 0.246 0.234 0.212
(0.189) (0.189) (0.158) (0.160)
FDI/GDP 0.475 0.416 0.379* 0.402*
(0.294) (0.261) (0.215) (0.236)
College degree/Population -0.128 -0.136 -0.095 -0.082
(0.326) (0.323) (0.274) (0.233)
Unemployment rate 0.122 0.325 0.218 0.352
(0.298) (0.292) (0.193) (0.196)
Constant -0.400 -0.513* -0.393** -0.475***
(0.271) (0.252) (0.196) (0.176)
Year fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
Clustered standard errors Province Province Province Province
Observations 296 296 269 269
F-statistic/Wald chi-square 17.19*** 17.85*** 469.84*** 604.96
Adjusted R-square 0.418 0.422
Arellano-Bond test for AR(1): p-value 0.001 0.001
Arellano-Bond test for AR(2): p-value 0.543 0.594
Sargan test of overidentification: p-value 0.240 0.218
Notes: Robust standard errors are corrected for province-level clustering and heteroskedasticity, and reported in
parentheses. *, **, and *** represent significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively.
39
Table 6 Interacting bank financing and institutional environment
This table presents regression results investigating the effect of interaction of bank financing and instructional
environment on regional entrepreneurial activities. Net birth rate is calculated as the percentage changes in total
number of small businesses (defined as firms with fewer than 300 employees). Bank Loans/GDP is defined as the
ratio of total loans by all banking institutions to total GDP. Profit (cost) efficiency of banks is the province-level
aggregated number of firm-level bank profit (cost) efficiency. Rule of law is a composite index measuring the
development of intermediary market, protection of producers’ legitimate rights and interests, and protection of
intellectual property. Social trust measures the “generalized trust” at provincial level which is derived from the China
General Social Survey in 2013. LogPopulation is the natural logarithm of provincial population GDP per capita
growth is defined as the real-term GDP growth per capita. FDI/GDP is defined as the ratio of foreign direct investment
to GDP. Proportion of population with college degrees is defined as the proportion of population with college degree
or high education to total population above age six. Unemployment rate measures province-level unemployment rate.
All the variables are measured at province level.
Independent variables Dependent variables: Net birth rate
(1) (2)
Bank loan/GDP 0.136* 0.068*
(0.067) (0.039)
Bank efficiency 0.890*** 1.014***
(0.260) (0.347)
Rule of law 0.073***
(0.024)
Social trust 0.116**
(0.042)
Bank loan/GDP × Rule of law -0.022**
(0.009)
Bank loan/GDP × Social trust -0.023*
(0.014)
Bank efficiency × Rule of law -0.089**
(0.040)
Bank efficiency × Social trust -0.159**
(0.076)
LogPopulation 0.039*** 0.025
(0.011) (0.015)
Per capita GDP 0.202 0.196
(0.174) (0.168)
FDI/GDP 0.425 0.469*
(0.315) (0.267)
College degree/Population 0.573 0.154
(0.384) (0.423)
Unemployment rate 0.457 0.204
(0.295) (0.346)
Constant -1.399*** -1.055***
(0.313) (0.329)
Year fixed effects Yes Yes
Clustered standard errors Province Province
Observations 296 296
F-statistic 21.82*** 20.81***
Adjusted R-square 0.458 0.438
Notes: Robust standard errors are corrected for province-level clustering and heteroskedasticity, and reported in
parentheses. *, **, and *** represent significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively.