barriers to wildlife migration coyote valley

1
Colleen Henn, Sophia Huang, Eddie Kelinsky, and Ryan Suttle BARRIERS TO WILDLIFE MIGRATION IN THE COYOTE VALLEY: YEAR TWO Dept. of Environmental Studies & Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority Introduction The Coyote Valley is a 7400-acre area between San Jose and Morgan Hill in California’s Silicon Valley. Not only does it serve as one of two critical connections between the Santa Cruz Mountain Range and the Diablo Mountain Range, but also it contains Silicon Valley’s last undeveloped groundwater recharge area. Our study area has been deemed a biodiversity hotspot, with over 20 species of mammals and over 200 species of birds, including 21 species of raptors (R. Phillips et al. 2008). This landscape and its surrounding mountain ranges provide habitat to a myriad of rich biodiversity, including rare, threatened, and endangered species, like the California Tiger Salamander and American Badger. Working with the Santa Clara Open Space Authority, we are seeking to create a more complete GIS database as well as to understand the current and future options for wildlife corridor research and development. US Highway 101 and Monterey Highway are two of the main barriers to wildlife movement between the Santa Cruz and Diablo mountain ranges. The effect of highly trafficked roads on animal populations can be seen in impacts such as habitat loss and alienation, mortality from road kill, habitat fragmentation, and sensory disturbance (Adams et al. 1983, Mansergh et al. 1989, Van der Zee et al. 1992). Our project is concerned with studying these and other existing migration barriers, to assess the viability of potential new corridors as well as improvements that could be done on current corridors, and propose policy options to maintain and improve wildlife movement through Coyote Valley. 1. What are the most commonly conceived barriers to wildlife migration? 2. What kind of attribute information would be helpful for researchers and land managers in monitoring and improving corridors? 3. What are some next steps in improving corridor management and maintenance in Coyote Valley? Research Questions Study Area Methods Literature review of existing case studies to analyze common barriers and successful solutions Interviewed eight stakeholders, including land managers and wildlife ecologists to compile GIS information to create a more comprehensive database Examined and categorized existing fence barriers with Google Earth Pro Improved upon existing GIS database by adding fence attributes: approximate height, fence type, presence of barbed wire, and transparency Analyzed policy solutions to preserve and maintain wildlife corridors During the span of our project, we identified specific barriers to wildlife migration in Coyote Valley. We improved details and attributes in the GIS database for future use by researchers and land managers in the Valley. In addition to consolidating habitat and infrastructure data, we classified fence attributes (Figure 4) and identified and recommended a particular area of priority on Highway 101, Monterey Highway, and Bailey Avenue for potential directional fencing additions (Figure 3) based on a high concentration of roadkill incidents due to high exposure and vulnerability during road crossings (Figure 1). Directional fencing would funnel wildlife towards nearby culverts so animals may pass Highway 101 safely. Policy Recommendations and Next Steps: Alter the zoning of the Upper- and Mid-Coyote Valley in the context of the San Jose 2020 General Plan to include corridor guarantees via citizen participation Continue improvement of GIS Database: actively monitor, locate and classify culverts; update roadkill data; include sound pollution data and wildlife sightings Mobilize and empower more local stakeholders, especially via town halls, distribution of brochures to private landowners, and photographs of animal usage of the corridor Adams, Lowell W., and Aelred D. Geis. “Effects of Roads on Small Mammals”. Journal of Applied Ecology 20.2 (1983): 403–415. Web. Mansergh, Ian M., and David J. Scotts. “Habitat Continuity and Social Organization of the Mountain Pygmy-possum Restored by Tunnel”. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53.3 (1989): 701–707. Web. Noss, R. F. 1993. Wildlife corridors In D. S. Smith and R. C. Hellmund, eds. Ecology of Greenways. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, NM. Phillips, R., T. Diamond, J. Phillips, P. Cornely, V. Jennings, and L. Morton. 2008. Coyote Valley Wildlife Corridor Monitoring Program 2008 Annual Report. De Anza College, Cupertino, California. Zee, F.f. Van Der, J. Wiertz, C.j.f. Ter Braak, R.c. Van Apeldoorn, and J. Vink. "Landscape Change as a Possible Cause of the Badger Meles Meles L. Decline in The Netherlands." Biological Conservation 61.1 (1992): 17-22. Science Direct. Web. Many thanks to the following stakeholders for contributions: Santa Clara University's Chris P. Bacon, Jake Smith from the Open Space Preserve, Jodi McGraw from Jodi McGraw Consulting Services, Morgan Grey from Berkeley, Neal Sharma from the Peninsula Open Space Trust, Ann Calnan from Valley Transportation Authority, Tanya Diamond and Tony Nelson from Sonoma Land Trust, Kirk Lenington from the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, and Dave Johnston from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Acknowledgements Figure 2. Known infrastructural barriers and wildlife movement monitoring or observation sites. Figure 4. Four different fence types found in Coyote Valley. Spatial data of fence types were created through analysis using Google Earth Pro and ArcMap. Findings Geospatial Analysis: References Conclusions Figure 3. High priority area along Hwy 101, Monterey Hwy, and Bailey Ave due to high density of roadkill observations. Directional fencing may guide animals to nearby culverts and decrease wildlife-vehicle collisions. © Google Earth Pro © Colleen Henn © Colleen Henn © Sophia Huang Chainlink fence with barbed wire. Horizontal wire fence. Vertical wood board fence. Example of ‘other’ category. Figure 1. Coyote crossing through traffic on Bailey Avenue in the heart of Coyote Valley. © De Anza College

Upload: colleen-henn

Post on 19-Feb-2017

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Barriers to Wildlife Migration Coyote Valley

Colleen Henn, Sophia Huang, Eddie Kelinsky, and Ryan Suttle

BARRIERS TO WILDLIFE MIGRATION IN THE COYOTE VALLEY: YEAR TWO

Dept. of Environmental Studies & Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority

IntroductionThe Coyote Valley is a 7400-acre area between San Jose and Morgan Hill in

California’s Silicon Valley. Not only does it serve as one of two critical connections between the Santa Cruz Mountain Range and the Diablo Mountain Range, but also it contains Silicon Valley’s last undeveloped groundwater recharge area. Our study area has been deemed a biodiversity hotspot, with over 20 species of mammals and over 200 species of birds, including 21 species of raptors (R. Phillips et al. 2008). This landscape and its surrounding mountain ranges provide habitat to a myriad of rich biodiversity, including rare, threatened, and endangered species, like the California Tiger Salamander and American Badger. Working with the Santa Clara Open Space Authority, we are seeking to create a more complete GIS database as well as to understand the current and future options for wildlife corridor research and development.

US Highway 101 and Monterey Highway are two of the main barriers to wildlife movement between the Santa Cruz and Diablo mountain ranges. The effect of highly trafficked roads on animal populations can be seen in impacts such as habitat loss and alienation, mortality from road kill, habitat fragmentation, and sensory disturbance (Adams et al. 1983, Mansergh et al. 1989, Van der Zee et al. 1992). Our project is concerned with studying these and other existing migration barriers, to assess the viability of potential new corridors as well as improvements that could be done on current corridors, and propose policy options to maintain and improve wildlife movement through Coyote Valley.

1. What are the most commonly conceived barriers to wildlife migration?

2. What kind of attribute information would be helpful for researchers and land managers in monitoring and improving corridors?

3. What are some next steps in improving corridor management and maintenance in Coyote Valley?

Research Questions

Study Area

Methods➢ Literature review of existing case studies to analyze common barriers and

successful solutions➢ Interviewed eight stakeholders, including land managers and wildlife

ecologists to compile GIS information to create a more comprehensive database

➢ Examined and categorized existing fence barriers with Google Earth Pro➢ Improved upon existing GIS database by adding fence attributes:

approximate height, fence type, presence of barbed wire, and transparency

➢ Analyzed policy solutions to preserve and maintain wildlife corridors

During the span of our project, we identified specific barriers to wildlife migration in Coyote Valley. We improved details and attributes in the GIS database for future use by researchers and land managers in the Valley. In addition to consolidating habitat and infrastructure data, we classified fence attributes (Figure 4) and identified and recommended a particular area of priority on Highway 101, Monterey Highway, and Bailey Avenue for potential directional fencing additions (Figure 3) based on a high concentration of roadkill incidents due to high exposure and vulnerability during road crossings (Figure 1). Directional fencing would funnel wildlife towards nearby culverts so animals may pass Highway 101 safely.

Policy Recommendations and Next Steps: • Alter the zoning of the Upper- and Mid-Coyote Valley in the context of the

San Jose 2020 General Plan to include corridor guarantees via citizen participation

• Continue improvement of GIS Database: actively monitor, locate and classify culverts; update roadkill data; include sound pollution data and wildlife sightings

• Mobilize and empower more local stakeholders, especially via town halls, distribution of brochures to private landowners, and photographs of animal usage of the corridor

Adams, Lowell W., and Aelred D. Geis. “Effects of Roads on Small Mammals”. Journal of Applied Ecology 20.2 (1983): 403–415. Web.

Mansergh, Ian M., and David J. Scotts. “Habitat Continuity and Social Organization of the Mountain Pygmy-possum Restored by Tunnel”. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53.3 (1989): 701–707. Web.

Noss, R. F. 1993. Wildlife corridors In D. S. Smith and R. C. Hellmund, eds. Ecology of Greenways. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, NM.

Phillips, R., T. Diamond, J. Phillips, P. Cornely, V. Jennings, and L. Morton. 2008. Coyote Valley Wildlife Corridor Monitoring Program 2008 Annual Report. De Anza College, Cupertino, California.

Zee, F.f. Van Der, J. Wiertz, C.j.f. Ter Braak, R.c. Van Apeldoorn, and J. Vink. "Landscape Change as a Possible Cause of the Badger Meles Meles L. Decline in The Netherlands." Biological Conservation 61.1 (1992): 17-22. Science Direct. Web.

Many thanks to the following stakeholders for contributions: Santa Clara University's Chris P. Bacon, Jake Smith from the Open Space Preserve, Jodi McGraw from Jodi McGraw Consulting Services, Morgan Grey from Berkeley, Neal Sharma from the Peninsula Open Space Trust, Ann Calnan from Valley Transportation Authority, Tanya Diamond and Tony Nelson from Sonoma Land Trust, Kirk Lenington from the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, and Dave Johnston from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife

Acknowledgements

Figure 2. Known infrastructural barriers and wildlife movement monitoring or observation sites.

Figure 4. Four different fence types found in Coyote Valley. Spatial data of fence types were created through analysis using Google Earth Pro and ArcMap.

Findings

Geospatial Analysis:

References

ConclusionsFigure 3. High priority area along Hwy 101, Monterey Hwy, and Bailey Ave due to high density of roadkill observations. Directional fencing may guide animals to nearby culverts and decrease wildlife-vehicle collisions.

© Google Earth Pro

© Colleen Henn

© Colleen Henn

© Sophia Huang

Chainlink fence with barbed wire.

Horizontal wire fence.

Vertical wood board fence.

Example of ‘other’ category.

Figure 1. Coyote crossing through traffic on Bailey Avenue in the heart of Coyote Valley.

© De Anza College