barron v. baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •barron –complained...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EXAMPLE (check the notes
below presentation)
![Page 2: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
GROUP TITLE SLIDE
![Page 3: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
• By student name
![Page 4: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background to the case • John Barron owned
shipping wharf in Baltimore
• As Baltimore grew, sand accumulated & made wharf WORTHLESS –Sued city saying he should
be compensated for losses A WHARF
![Page 5: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Arguments from either side • Barron
– Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for most ships to his dock resulting in loss of revenue
– Sued the city AND won but later overturned ($4500)
• Baltimore – Not responsibility for normal
expansion issues
– This doesn’t involve just compensation from 5th amendment
![Page 6: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What’s at Stake? • The Fifth Amendment
says, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” –Barron wasn’t
compensated!!
THE PROBLEM Does the Fifth Amendment deny the states as well as the national government the right to take private property for public use without justly compensating the property's owner? Do amendments apply to states?
We already know they apply to the national government
![Page 7: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Garner Student Guesses Supreme
Court decision
Does the Fifth Amendment deny the states as well as the national government the right to take private property for public use without justly compensating the property's owner? Do amendments apply to states?
![Page 8: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Ruling?
![Page 9: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Ruling • Amendments only apply to
Nat’l Gov’t, not states • Framers of Const. & Bill of
Rights were worried about too much nat’l power, not too much state power
• B/c Amendments don’t apply to states, Supreme Court has no business dealing w/ this case
• LET MARYLAND DEAL WITH IT
![Page 10: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Case’s significance OR Short-Term Effect
• States NOT held accountable to any of Bill of Rights or other amendments…yet
![Page 11: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Long-Term Effect • People in states weren't
necessarily given rights enumerated in Bill of Rights.
• 90 years later overturned “Selective Incorporation” –Gitlow v. New York (1923)
![Page 12: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Sources Cited…(example)
• MLA formatting
• Sources should include: –Oyez.org
–Content for Supreme Court cases
–Which search engine you used for images
![Page 13: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Next presentation would start after
last with title slide
![Page 14: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
By Mr. McLeod
![Page 15: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Facts • Gitlow (socialist) passed out papers
calling for people create a socialist gov’t thru strikes, & other class based actions – Convicted under New York law against
anarchy which punished people trying to overthrow the gov’t by force
• Didn’t matter whether any person receiving his papers actually did anything
Can Gitlow speak?
![Page 16: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Arguments from either side • Gitlow • New York
![Page 17: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
What’s at Stake? • Is New York violating the 1st
Amendment? • 1st Amendment: “Congress shall
make no law…abridging the freedom of speech.”
• THE PROBLEM Is the New York law punishing advocacy to overthrow the government by force an unconstitutional violation of the free speech clause of the First Amendment?
• Should the Court overturn Barron v. Baltimore?
Remember John Barron & his stupid wharf?
![Page 18: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Garner Student Guesses Supreme
Court decision
Is the New York law punishing advocacy to overthrow the
government by force an unconstitutional violation of the
free speech clause of the First Amendment?
Should the Court overturn Barron v. Baltimore?
![Page 19: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Ruling?
![Page 20: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Supreme Court Ruling • Because of “Due Process” & “Equal
Protection of the 14th Amendment, they DO apply to the states
• State CAN LIMIT Free Speech but only if it is directly leading to actions dangerous to public security
• In other words, the speech needs to be creating a “clear & present danger”
• So…What’s the deal with this 14th Amendment?
![Page 21: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Case’s significance OR Short-Term Effect
• Starts “Selective Incorporation” of Bill of Rights using Equal Protections Clause of the 14th
![Page 22: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Long-Term Effect
• Selective incorporation (Bill of Rights) starts applying to states NOT just federal gov’t
![Page 23: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sources Cited…(example)
• MLA formatting
• Sources should include: –Oyez.org
–Content for Supreme Court cases
–Which search engine you used for images
![Page 24: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Next presentation would start after
last with title slide
![Page 25: Barron v. Baltimorewhsjantoon.weebly.com/uploads/5/7/6/8/57682575/... · •Barron –Complained when sand accumulate near wharf due to city expansion which limited the access for](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042107/5e86aa3d58f7f502e224fed5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Discussion day • Submit 3-5 questions (why) that have to do
w/ your court case or topic that will stimulate deeper thinking (one question per student)
–Should some religions be outlawed?
–Should public funds be used for construction of religious prayer rooms
–Is religion legal?