based on two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary nn serpentis

22
Two planets orbiting the post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis Evidence for planets orbiting the post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis Stefan Dreizler Institut für Astrophysik Göttingen Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis A&A submitted K. Beuermann 1 , F. V. Hessman 1 , S. Dreizler 1 , T. R. Marsh 2 , S.G. Parsons 2 , D.E. Winget 3 , G. F. Miller 3 , M. R. Schreiber 4 , W. Kley 5 , V. S. Dhillon 6 , S. P. Littlefair 6 , C.M. Copperwheat 2 , J. J. Hermes 3 1) Göttingen, 2) Warwick, 3) Austin, 4) Valparaiso, 5) Tübingen, 6) Sheffield

Upload: aoife

Post on 19-Mar-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evidence for planets orbiting the post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis Stefan Dreizler Institut für Astrophysik Göttingen. Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis A&A submitted - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Evidence for planets orbiting the post-common envelope binary

NN Serpentis

Stefan DreizlerInstitut für Astrophysik Göttingen

Based onTwo planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope

binary NN SerpentisA&A submitted

K. Beuermann1, F. V. Hessman1 , S. Dreizler1, T. R. Marsh2, S.G. Parsons2, D.E. Winget3, G. F. Miller3,

M. R. Schreiber4, W. Kley5, V. S. Dhillon6, S. P. Littlefair6, C.M. Copperwheat2, J. J. Hermes3

1) Göttingen, 2) Warwick, 3) Austin, 4) Valparaiso, 5) Tübingen, 6)

Sheffield

Page 2: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Exoplanets

• ≤ 500 exoplantes

• Various methods• Growing number of planets around evolved stars

• ≈ 10% in binaries

• Recently: circum-binary planets

Page 3: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

A school project …

Page 4: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

NN Serpentis

• PG1550+131 (Wilson et al. 1986)• Porb = 3.12 hr (Haefner et al. 1989; MCCP)

• VLT imaging, spectroscopy (Haefner et al. 2004)

Haefner et al. 1989

Page 5: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Orbital ParametersParsons et al. 2010a

a = 0.934 R TWD = 57,000 K

MWD = 0.535 M D = 512 pc

Msec = 0.111 M Age of WD ~ 106 yr

i = 89.6°

Page 6: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Eclipse Timing ResidualsQian et al. 2009

MCCPVLT

Lijiang

UltraCam

Bialkow

P = 7.6 years, a < 3.3 A.U., M = 11 MJupiter

Page 7: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Eclipse Timing ResidualsParsons et al. 2010b

• Planetary solution rejected• No satisfactory fit with linear ephemeris

• VLT point suspicious

MCCPVLT

UltraCam

Bialkow

Lijiang

Page 8: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Revisiting the VLT Observations

• Trailed FORS images (Haefner et al. 2004)

1125.7462 secs

(±0.2 secs !)

Page 9: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

MONET/North Observations

Page 10: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Timing Residuals

MCCPVLT

Lijiang

UltraCam

MONET

Bialkow

Page 11: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

What the timing variations are not

• Not due to complicated eclipse profile

• Not due to stellar activity• Not due to Applegate’s mechanism

– Spin-orbit coupling due to magnetic cycles and radius changes within the secondary

– Time scale on decades or longer– Needs too much energy (Chen 2009)

• Not due to apsidal motion– Precession of periastron due to tides– Amplitude t = Pbin ebin = 3577 s ebin OK with ebin~0.01

– Variation of the FWHM not seen– Period would be ~0.4 years

Page 12: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

McDonald Observations

Page 13: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

UltraCam Observations

Page 14: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Model #1 : 3rd Body

P = 22.6 years, e > 0.65

a = 6.9 A.U., M = 8.4 MJupiter

Page 15: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Model #2 : 2 Bodies

Page 16: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

The 2+2-Body Solutions

• Binary– Pdot < -10-13 (GR angular momentum loss OK)

• Two stable 2+2 solutions (grid search)– Pb:Pc ≈ 2:1 ≈ 5:2 (±15%)– Reduced 2 0.90 0.91

• NN Ser b– eb 0 0 – Pb [years] 15.50±0.45 16.73±0.26– ab [A.U.] 5.38±0.20 5.65±0.06– Mb sin i [MJupiter] 6.89±0.54 5.93±0.40

• NN Ser c– ec 0.20±0.02 0.22±0.02– Pc [years] 7.75±0.35 6.69±0.40– ac [A.U.] 3.39±0.10 3.07±0.13– Mc sin i [MJupiter] 2.24±0.38 1.61±0.27

Page 17: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

0.7 A.U.

0.9 A.U.

Orbital Histories of NN Ser A,B

Red Giant Envelope

Common Envelope Ejection

Page 18: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Orbital History of NN Ser b,c

• Binary Star System– ~2.1 Msun A star + M dwarf at ~1 A.U. (CE=0.25)

– RGB expansion causes CE ejection ~1 million years ago

– Planets around NN Ser A absorbed

• 1st Generation (circumbinary):– NN Ser b,c at > ~3 A.U.– Drift outwards/near escape due to loss of 1.5 M from NN Ser A

– Differential drift inwards due to frictional drag (gravitational), tidal forces

– Dynamical evolution stops at radii ~3 & 5-6 A.U. with resonance condition between b & c

Page 19: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

A Primitive Evolution Simulation

Page 20: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Orbital History of NN Ser b,c

• 2nd Generation (circumbinary) :– Original planets at a < ~1 A.U. lost in RGB – Formation of planets in the metal rich and massive CE with 1.5 M

– NN Ser b,c come into resonance as very young planets

• Mixed :– Original planets at a < ~1 A.U. lost in RGB– Less massive planets at a ~ 2-6 A.U. survive CE and accretes from CE

– 1st genaration plate might trigger planet formation in CE

– NN Ser b,c come into resonance as rejuvinated/young planets

Page 21: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Conclusions

• The task of observing the variations and constraining the origin of the timing variations is very difficult

• It helps to have lots of access to 1m and occational access to 2-3m telescopes

• The eclipse time variations in NN Ser A/B are most simply explained as the timing effect due to two massive, circumbinary planets

• The planets could either be 1st or 2nd generation (or both), depending upon the details of their interaction with the CE and the CE’s long-term evolution

• Potentially many more circum-binary, post-common envelope planets to come

http://solar-flux.forumandco.com/worlds-f12/edasich-s-work-t337.htm

Page 22: Based on Two planets orbiting the recently formed post-common envelope binary NN Serpentis

Two

plan

ets

orbi

ting

the

post

-com

mon

en

velo

pe b

inar

y N

N S

erpe

ntis

Common Envelope