bcis audit returns of interventional procedures 2000

56
BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000 Mark de Belder BCIS UK National Audit Officer on behalf of Council of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Southampton, October 2001

Upload: yaron

Post on 22-Jan-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000. Southampton, October 2001. Mark de Belder BCIS UK National Audit Officer on behalf of Council of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. UK Intervention Centres. UK Interventional & Diagnostic Centres 2000. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Mark de BelderBCIS UK National Audit Officeron behalf of Council of the

British Cardiovascular Intervention Society

Southampton, October 2001

Page 2: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

UK Intervention CentresYear No. Centres1991 521992 521993 531994 541995 541996 531997 581998 611999 632000 66

Page 3: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

UK Interventional & Diagnostic Centres 2000

No. No Dataon Caths

(%)

Caths(% oftotal)

PCIs(% oftotal)

NHSInterventional

49 9(18%)

85,030(69%)

30,916(92%)

PrivateInterventional

17 4(24%)

8,575(7.0%)

2,736(8.1%)

Diagnosticonly

63 7(11%)

29,700(24%)

0

TOTAL 131 - 123,305 33,652

3.5 caths for every 1 PCI in Intervention centres (1.2-82) (3.51 NHS, 3.73 Private)

Making assumptions about no. of caths done in centres not reporting,estimated caths in UK approx 145,000 = 4.3 caths/PCI

Page 4: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Centres providing NO DATA

None!

Page 5: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Centres providing NO or MINIMAL data on Centre Description Form (A)

Harefield Edinburgh Royal Infirmary Sheffield (Ayrshire & Arran) Cromwell Bristol BUPA

Page 6: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Centres providing NO or MINIMAL DATAon Minimum Data Form (B)

No data Harefield BUPA Bristol

Minimal Data Birmingham QEH Yorkshire Ht Centre Sheffield

Page 7: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Centres with MINIMAL or NO DATAon Outcome Form (C) Belfast City City, Birmingham Harefield Yorkshire Heart Centre UH Wales, Cardiff London Chest Manchester RI John Radcliffe, Oxford Royal Brompton Northern, Sheffield St Bartholomew’s

St Mary’s Derriford, Plymouth Eastbourne

Wellington Ross Hall London Independent St Anthony’s The Priory, Birmingham Harley St Clinic BUPA Bristol BUPA Lea Cambridge

Page 8: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Centres with no HOSPITAL Outcome Data

Cath Lab Data Only Blackpool Edinburgh Western Wythenshawe Morriston, Swansea

BMI Alexander, Manchester BUPA Leicester HCI Glasgow

Unspecified Data Belfast Royal Victoria Birmingham QE Bristol Royal Infirmary Hammersmith Hull Royal Infirmary Papworth Edinburgh Royal Infirmary Glasgow Western Glasgow Royal Infirmary Liverpool CTC Middlesex/UCH Freeman, Newcastle Glenfield, Leicester Hairmyres

Unspecified DataBUPA LeedsLondon BridgeCromwellYorkshire Heart ClinicPark, Nottingham

Page 9: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Volume of procedures in NHS CentresTotal number of procedures per annum

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

<10

0

-200

-300

-400

-500

-600

-700

-800

-900

-100

0

>10

00

1999

2000

Page 10: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Total UK PCI ProceduresYear Centres Total

ProceduresRate permillion

%increase

1991 52 9,933 174

1992 52 11,575 203 16.5

1993 53 12,937 227 11.8

1994 54 14,624 256 13.0

1995 54 17,344 304 18.6

1996 53 20,511 359 18.1

1997 58 22,902 402 11.7

1998 61 24,899 437 8.7

1999 63 28,133 494 13

2000 66 33,652 590 20

Page 11: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

PCI Rates per million population (UK)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

'85

'88

'90

'92

'94

'96

'98

'00

Page 12: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

PCI vs Isolated CABG Rates (UK)Data from BCIS and SCTS Registry

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00

BCISSCTS

Page 13: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

PCI: UK 1996-2000 vs Rest of Europe 1996/1998

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

PCIs/million

Ita

UK

96

UK

97

UK

98

UK

99

UK

00

Sp

a

Fin

Gre

De

n

Sw

e

No

r

Au

st

Ne

th

Fra

Sw

i

Be

lg

Ge

r

1996

1998

Page 14: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

No. of Consultant Interventionists in NHS Centres, 2000 data from 48 centres

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

No of Centres

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 21

No of Consultants/Centre

Average 5.5 / Centre

Page 15: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

No of PCIs per Consultant in NHS Centres, 2000data from 48 centres

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

No of Centres

0-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 >250

No PCIs/Consultant

Average 125 / Consultant

Page 16: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

All PCI Procedures Mortality 2000 data from 48 centres

Year Data From: Total Mortality % Range %

1991 9,071(9,933)

0.48

1992 43/52 10,483(11,575)

0.71 0-3.5

1993 44/53 11,859(12,937)

0.59 0-2.7

1994 44/54 12,598(14,624)

0.60 0-2.7

1995 35/54 11,365(17,344)

0.69 0-3.4

1996 37/53 14,476(20,511)

0.72 0-3.2

1997 41/58 17,577(22,902)

0.91 0-10

1998 44/61 16,946(24,899)

0.80 0-9.1

1999 48/63 20,975(28,133)

0.61 0-4

2000 48/66 24,323(33,652)

0.64 0-2.6

Page 17: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

All PCI procedures2000 data from 41 centres

Year Total Vessels/case

Success % MI % Em.CABG

Mortality%

1991 9,933 86 1.6 2.6 0.48

1992 11,575 1.17 88 1.4 2.0 0.71

1993 12,937 1.09 89 1.1 1.9 0.59

1994 14,624 1.15 90 1.0 1.6 0.60

1995 17,344 1.17 89 1.4 1.9 0.69

1996 20,511 1.17 90 1.4 1.7 0.72

1997 15,667(22,902)

1.16 92 1.2 1.1 0.89

1998 18,560(24,899)

1.24 92 0.8 0.7 0.80

1999 19,889(28,133)

1.11 90 0.57 0.48 0.61

2000 20,939(33,652)

1.21 92 0.6 0.4 0.7

Page 18: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Stent procedures 1992 - 20002000 data from 61 centres

0102030405060708090

% of all PCIs

'92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00

Year

Page 19: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Stenting in different centres 1998-20002000 data from 61 centres

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

No. of Centres

31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 >90

% Stented

1998

1999

2000

Page 20: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Impact of Stenting 1992-20002000 data from 40 centres

Year % Stented % PCI forRestenosis

% needingEm.CABG

1992 2.7 11.6 2.0

1993 5.6 12.3 2.0

1994 13.5 11.4 1.8

1995 27.6 9.6 1.9

1996 45.9 9.4 1.5

1997 60 7.4 1.1

1998 69 5.2 0.6

1999 79 4.8 0.48

2000 85 6.2 0.4

Page 21: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Stenting and the need for emergency CABG (2000 data from 40 centres)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

'92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00

Year

%

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

%

% Stent

% Em.CABG

Page 22: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Stenting and procedures for restenosis

(2000 data from 40 centres)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

'92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00

Year

%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

%

% Stent

% Restenosis

Page 23: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

PCI for Restenosis 1998 - 2000(2000 data from 40 centres)

0

5

10

15

20

25

No. of Centres

0-5 5.1-10 10.1-15 >15

% for Restenosis

1998

1999

2000

Page 24: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Stent Procedures 1992 - 20002000 data from 29 centres

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Elective 179 341 834 2,595 2,373 3,170(45%)

(7.5-100)

3,376(56%)(0-100)

7,244(64%)

(19-100)

9,365(75%)

(19-100)

Sub-optimal 2,166 2,759(39%)(0-98)

2,238(37%)(0-100)

3,909(31%)(0-83)

2,773(22%)(0-79)

Bail-out 140 286 1,086 1,269 429 975(14%)(0-52)

410(6.8%)(0-27)

538(4.8%)(0-35)

299 (2.4%)(0-35)

% Bail-out 44 46 44 33 16 14 6.8 4.8% 2.4%

Total StentProcedures

319 660 1,937 4,574 9,165 7,096of

11,905

6,024of

12,507

11,691of

19,769

12,437of

27,057

Page 25: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Stent use 1997 - 2000(2000 data from 29 centres)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

% of all stented cases

ES SOS BOS

Stent use

1997199819992000

Page 26: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

ReoPro in different centres 1999 - 20002000 data from 61 centres

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

No. of Centres

0_10

11_2

0

21_3

0

31_4

0

41_5

0

51_6

0

61_7

0

71_8

0

81_9

0

% ReoPro

ReoPro used in 22% of cases in 200050 cases using eptifibatide or tirofiban reported

Page 27: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

ReoPro use 1997 - 20002000 data from 61 centres

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

% use

1997 1998 1999 2000

Year

Page 28: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Other procedures 2000 - 1

PTCRA DCA TEC Laser CB Thromb

Centres 18+

4-

0-

3+

33++

13+

No. 119+

12-

0-

34+

372+

53*++

Mean 6.6-

3-

0-

11+

11-

4.1+

Range 1-50 2-4 - 1-31 1-73 1-31

+, =, - : increase, no change or decrease compared to 1999* mainly Xsizer NB Only 2 reported to voluntary registry

Page 29: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Other procedures 2000 - 2

BrachyRx P(D)MR IVUS Angio-scopy

Groinclosure*

Centres 5+

0-

26-

3+

37+

Number 57++

0-

341-

14+

5938++

Mean 11 - 13-

4.7 160+

Range 3-21 - 1-50 2-6 1-766

+, =, - : increase, no change, or decrease compared to 1999* Mainly Angioseal

Page 30: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Other Procedures 2000 - 3

MVplasty AVplasty PVplasty TVPlasty Coart/Re-coarct

Centres 33+

7-

5--

1=

5+

No. 199--

13-

13-

1=

10+

Mean 6-

1.9=

2.6+

- 2+

Range 1-26 -

1-3 1-5 -

- 1-4

+, =, - : increase, no change, or decrease compared to 1999

Page 31: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Other Procedures 2000 - 4PDA ASD* PFO* VSD

Centres 7+

20+

6+

0=

No. 12+

190++

19+

0=

Mean 1.7=

9.5+

3.2+

-

Range 1-2 1-32 1-9 -

+, =, - : increase, no change or decrease compared to 1999* Some centres give combined data for ASD/PFO closure

Page 32: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Other Procedures 2000 - 5

Renal Sub-clavian

Pulm.artery

Aorta SVC Carotid

Centres 1=

1=

0-

0-

3+

1+

No. 4=

1=

0-

0-

4=

1+

Mean - - - - 1.3 -

Range - - - - 1-2 -

+, =, - : increase, no change, or decrease compared to 1999

Page 33: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Other procedures 2000 - 6

FBremoval

Emboln. Pericard. PressureWire

FlowWire

SeptalAbln.

Embolis’nProtection

Device

Centres 9+

9+

1=

2=

1=

1=

4+

Number 15+

26+

2-

31-

2-

7+

16+

Mean 1.7 2.9 - 15 - - 4

Range 1-5 1-9 - 13-18 - - 1-10

+, =, - : increase, no change, or decrease compared to 1999

Page 34: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Centres providing complete or near complete data on Hospital Outcome 2000 (18)

Aberdeen Birmingham Heartlands Guy’s & St Thomas’s King’s College Hospital Walsgrave, Coventry Royal Free Hospital Stoke City General Southampton St George’s

James Cook UH, Middlesbrough Nottingham City Hospital Royal Devon & Exeter KE VIIth, Midhurst Sandwell Hospital Royal Sussex County, Brighton Ayrshire & Arran RCH Truro

Heart Hospital

Page 35: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000All patientsData from 18 centres

No.(centres)

Success PartialSuccess

Failed RepeatPCI

CABG MI Death(Range)

8960(18)

92% (86-100)

1.6% (0-2.1)

3.9%(0-7.9)

0.5%(0-0.9)

0.5%(0-9.1)

0.8%(0-3.1)

1.1%(0-2.7)

Page 36: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeDeath (with 95% CI) Data from 18 centres

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

5

0 5 10 15 20

Page 37: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeFreedom from MACE rates (with 95% CI) Data from 18 centres

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

0 5 10 15 20

Page 38: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeEm. CABG (with 95% CI) Data from 17 centres

012345

6789

10

0 5 10 15 20

Page 39: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeFailed Procedures (with 95% CI) Data from 18 centres

012345

6789

10

0 5 10 15 20

Page 40: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Examples of different case-mix

Centre ElectiveNo CTO

CTO cases UA Shock Non-shockMI cases

Post MI

1(n=343)

29% 3.8% 31% 2.3% 11% 22%

2(n=963)

44% 7.5% 27% 0.3% 6.3% 16%

3(n=749)

35% 2.9% 18% 2% 18% 24%

4(n=131)

77% 12% 11% 0% 0% 0%

5(n=10)

0% 0% 50% 0% 20% 30%

Page 41: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000Elective patients

No.(centres)

Success PartialSuccess

RepeatPCI

CABG MI Death(Range)

StableSingle Ves(no CTO)

3448(15)

96% (88-97)

0.2% (0-1.2)

0.3%(0-1.2)

0.3%(0-1.1)

0.5%(0-1.6)

0.12%(0-0.5)

StableMultivessel(no CTO)

912(14)

92%(85-100)

3.9%(0-6.7)

0.2%(0-0.8)

0.3%(0-1.4)

0.8%(0-1.5)

0.5%(0-3.9)

Single VesCTO *

407(14)

64%(45-91)

1.0%(0-5.3)

0.2%(0-1.4)

0.2%(0-1.0)

0.5%(0-2.0)

0%

MultivesselInc. CTO *

241(13)

80%(40-100)

14%(0-37)

0% 0% 0.4%(0-2.2)

0.4 %(0-2.9)

* does not account for clinical syndrome

Page 42: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000Patients with previous CABG and those treated for restenosis

No.(centres)

Success PartialSuccess

RepeatPCI

CABG MI Death(Range)

CABG pts * 907(14)

90%(80-97)

2.1%(0-8.9)

0.3%(0-2.2)

0.2%(0-2.9)

1.3%(0-6.7)

1.0%(0-4.4)

Restenosis * 405(15)

93%(79-100)

1.0%(0-1.9)

0.7%(0-2.9)

1.5%(0-100)

0.5%(0-20)

0.7%(0-3.1)

* does not account for clinical syndrome

Page 43: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000Unstable angina

No.(Centres)

Success PartialSuccess

RepeatPCI

CABG Q MI Death(Range)

Single VesUA

1945(17)

93%(67-100)

0.6%(0-2.7)

0.8%(0-4.2)

0.6%(0-33)

0.6%(0-3.3)

0.9%(0-1.6)

MultivesselUA

488(14)

90%(83-100)

6.8%(0-15)

0.8%(0-2.6)

0.2%(0-5)

0.4%(0-1.5)

0.6%(0-4.2)

Page 44: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000Acute closure

No.(Centres)

Success PartialSuccess

RepeatPCI

CABG Q MI Death(Range)

Acuteclosure

68(12)

81%(40-100)

1.5%(0-20)

4.4%(0-100)

1.5%(0-20)

8.8%(0-100)

10%(0-100)

Page 45: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000Acute MI patients

No.(Centres)

Success PartialSuccess

RepeatPCI

CABG re-MI Death(Range)

PrimaryPTCA

163(13)

86%(60-100)

0.6 %(0-7.7)

1.2%(0-20)

0.6 %(0-5)

4.0 %(0-17)

4.9%(0-40)

SalvagePTCA

242(15)

88%(59-100)

1.7%(0-7.4)

1.2%(0-5.9)

1.7%(0-10)

1.2%(0-10)

6.2%(0-26)

Re-MIPTCA

166(10)

87%(0-100)

3%(0-6)

2.4%(0-10)

2.4%(0-6.3)

1.2%(0-100)

6%(0-13)

Shock 92(13)

55%(0-100)

1.0%(0-20)

4.0%(0-100)

2.0%(0-40)

1%(0-6.3)

39%(19-100)

Page 46: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital Outcome 2000Post MI patients

No.(Centres)

Success PartialSuccess

RepeatPCI

CABG Re-MI

Death(Range)

Post MI UA 986(14)

94%(86-100)

1.2%(0-5.6)

0.6%(0-2.8)

0.9%(0-2.5)

0.9%(0-5.3)

1.0%(0-2.8)

Post MIStable/+ETT

319(8)

95%(88-100)

0.9%(0-5.9)

0% 0.6%(0-1.9)

0.9%(0-1.7)

0.3%(0-1)

ALL MIPatients

1498(15)

89%(67-95)

1.0%(0-5)

1.1%(0-4.3)

1.2%(0-5.5)

1.2%(0-6.5)

5.0%(0-20)

Page 47: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeElective Single Vessel PCI (no CTO)Success (Freedom from MACE) rates (with 95% CI) Data from 15 centres

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

0 5 10 15 20

Page 48: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeElective Single Vessel PCI (no CTO)Mortality rates (with 95% CI) Data from 15 centres

00.20.40.60.8

1

1.21.41.61.8

2

0 5 10 15 20

Page 49: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Hospital OutcomeCardiogenic Shock PCI (Primary or Rescue)Mortality rates (with 95% CI) Data from 15 centres

01020304050

60708090

100

0 5 10 15 20

1 of 1

Page 50: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Comparison of data reported from a single centre with other contributing centres

Syndrome No Success orPartial Succ.

CBG MI or re-MI Death

Elective1V

191 183 (96%) 0 0 0

No CTO 3257 3137 (96%) 10 (0.3%) 18 (0.6%) 4 (0.1%)

All Unstable 137 132 (96%) 0 0 0

Angina 2296 2158 (94%) 13 (0.6%) 14 (0.6%) 20 (0.9%)

Rescue 50 47 (92%) 0 0 2 (4%)

PCI 209 170 (89%) 4 (2.1%) 3 (1.6%) 13 (6.8%)

All ShockPCI

15 10 (67%) 0 0 5 (33%)

(Primary &Rescue)

77 42 (54%) 2 (3%) 1 (1.4%) 31 (40%)

Page 51: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

BCIS/CCAD UpdateCCAD

Questionnaire DoH Meeting, November 2001 NHSIA Meeting to revisit datasets Phased participation over 2002? Pressure on Trusts/Commissioners

Page 52: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

BCIS/CCAD UpdateData SetParallel Projects

A = Centre B = Bean Count C = Outcome data by Syndrome

Page 53: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

BCIS New Technologies Group - Registries

BrachytherapyEndicor X-sizer

Page 54: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

BCIS/CCAD UpdateConclusions

Continued growth in PTCA (84% stented, 22-23% with GP IIb/IIIa) but still lagging behind European/American centres

Still a lot of low volume operators Expansion of PCI activity appears to have been

achieved in 2 ways– higher numbers of PCIs performed in a small number

of hands– increased numbers of operators (presumably attending

consultants from other hospitals)

Page 55: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

BCIS/CCAD UpdateConclusions

Data submission still incomplete - questionnaire to establish what is needed.

Encouraging noises from DoH re CCAD BCIS will continue current data collection system

even for those units who start to use CCAD Current system provides some means of bench-

marking New Technologies Registries may not be

effective on a voluntary basis (CCAD could overcome this)

Page 56: BCIS Audit Returns of Interventional Procedures 2000

Clinical Governance

Individual outcomes ‘to be public within a year’Hospital Doctor 18th October 2001

“DoH considering a proposal from Dr Foster”