bcps 2015 parcc testing - wordpress.com · 2016-01-19 · school is too new. in finishing up these...

To the BOE:

People have been asking for preliminary data. We have looked at publicly available information

and have enclosed what we have found.

http://reportcard.msde.mary!and.gov/downloadindex.aspx?K=99AAAA

This version includes comparisons for 9 out of 10 of the lighthouse schools (previously only 5 were done}

using Tiers and MSA data from 2013-2014 to find similar schools. Mays Chapel is not done as the school is too new.

In finishing up these last comparisons using MSA data to find similar schools, we realized that we

inadvertently left out 8 of the 100+ elementary schools, and that we inadvertently classified Gunpowder

as a Tier 1 school, when it is currently listed as a Tier 2 school. We have also enclosed a corrected

version of the prior charts that addresses these errors. These changes do not affect the overall message

substantively.

Again, please verify all of this. While it was done carefully, it merits checking.

BCPS 2015 PARCC Testing: Lighthouse vs Non-Lighthouse

Elementary Schools

Grade 3

English Language Arts

Mathematics

Updated: 18 January 2016

PARCC Data Evaluation • 2015 PARCC data for BCPS obtained from http:/ I

re po rtca rd. msd e. maryland .gov I down I oa din d ex. as px? K =99 AAAA

• Levels 4 (Met Expectations) and Levels 5 (Exceeded Expectations) were added together to obtain the Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding Expectations. If level was reported as <5%, all known levels were added together to determine missing percentage and then equally divided between <5% categories.

• BCPS tier designations are obtained from http:/ /www.bcps.org/schools/ schoolsByTier.aspx

• Data are averaged across all Non-Lighthouse schools within a tier and compared to the averaged data across all Lighthouse schools within the same tier.

• January 18, 2016- data updated with test scores from 8 non-lighthouse elementary schools that were missed in the first round of data evaluation.

-Ln Qj >

70.00

~ 60.00 "C s:: ta

o::t Qj ~ 50.00

Ill s:: 0 ·~ ta 40.00 tJ cu c. X

LU

tiO .~ 30.00 "C cu cu u X

LU ,._ 0 tiO s:: ·~ cu cu ~ Ill .... s:: cu

"C ::s ....

V)

'*'

20.00

10.00

0.00

BCPS Elementary Schools: Grade 3 Students Meeting or Exceeding Expectations (Scoring at Levels 4 & 5)

English Language Arts PARCC Test 2015 -- --- - -- ---

r

·-

Non-lighthouse School Lighthouse School Non-lighthouse School 1 Lighthouse School Non-lighthouse ~chool Lighthouse School

language Arts language Arts language Arts

Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

-Ln

cu > cu .....

"'C ~ !U

""'" cu > cu ..... -Ill ~ 0 :p !U +' u cu Q. >< w b.O ~

"'C cu cu u >< w ... 0 b.O ~

"'" cu cu ~ Ill +' ~ cu

"'C ::J +' (,/)

*-

50.00

45.00

40.00

35.00

30.00

25.00

20.00

15.00

10.00

5.00

0.00


Mathematics PARCC Test 2015

-

Non-lighthouse School 1 Lighthouse School Non-lighthouse School Lighthouse School Non-lighthouse School Lighthouse School

Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics


- 70.00 Ln

Qj > Ql .....

"'t:l 1: 60.00 111

o::t Qj > Ql ..... - 50.00 Ill 1: 0 .+' 111 ... u Ql c. 40.00 X

LU

ti.O 1:

"'t:l Ql Ql 30.00 u X

LU .... 0 ti.O 1:

.+' 20.00 Ql

Ql

~ ... 1: Ql u ....

10.00 Ql 0..

0.00


PARCC Test 2015

- I • Non-lighthouse School

- I C Lighthouse School

Language Arts Mathematics Language Arts Mathematics Language Arts Mathematics


BCPS Tier 1 Elementary Schools Grade 3 Percent Students Meeting/Exceeding Expectations- Level 4 &5 BLUE: Non-Lighthouse School ORANGE: lighthouse School

Tier 1 Mathematics Grade 3 Carroll Manor Carroll Manor

Hillcrest Riderwood

Jacksonville Timonium

Riderwood Cromwell Valley

Pinewood Pinewood

West Towson Fifth District

Kingsville West Towson

Seventh District Summit Park

Timonium Stone leigh

Fifth District Hillcrest

Chapel Hill Kingsville

Stoneleigh Seventh District

Cromwell Valley Sparks

Sparks Chapel Hill

Pine Grove Prettyboy

Summit Park Jacksonville

Seven Oaks Fullerton

Fullerton Rodgers Forge

Rodgers Forge Mays Chapel

NewTown Pine Grove

Chadwick Chadwick

Red House Run NewTown

Westchester Hampton

Hampton Seven Oaks

Edge mere Relay

Joppa View Westchester

Relay Joppa View

Woodholme Edge mere

Carney Chesapeake Terrace

Mays Chapel Woodholme

Prettyboy Red House Run

Warren Church Lane

Charlesmont Pot Spring

Middleborough Carney

Seneca Warren

Chesapeake Terrace Charlesmont

Pot Spring Middleborough

Church lane Seneca

0 10 20 30 40 so 60 70 80 90 I 0 10 )() 30 40 50 60 70 80

Harford Hills

lutherville laboratory

Vincent Farm

Franklin

Gunpowder

Catonsville

Wellwood International

Fort Garrison

Villa Cresta

Chatsworth School

Winand

Perry Hall

Cedarmere

Randallstown

Westowne

Victory Villa

Shady Spring

Padonia International

Oliver Beach

Hernwood

Berkshire

Sussex

Arbutus

Orems

Timber Grove

Woodbridge

Mil brook

Dogwood

Owings Mills

Glyndon

Grange

Powhatan

Bedford

Halethorpe

Martin Boulevard

Essex

Reisterstown

Scholars K-8

Deer Park

Elmwood

lansdowne

BearCreek

Johnnycake

Battle Grove

Sandalwood

Pleasant Plains

Dundalk

Norwood

Oakleigh

Glen mar

Chase

McCormick

Edmondson Heights

0

BCPS Tier 2 Elementary Schools Grade 3 Percent Students Meeting/Exceeding Expectations- Level 4 &5 BLUE: Non-Lighthouse School ORANGE: Lighthouse School

Tier 2 English Language Arts Grade 3 Tier 2 Mathematics Grade 3 lutherville Laboratory

Fort Garrison

Vincent Farm

Catonsville

Harford Hills

Chatsworth School

Gunpowder

Franklin

Westowne

Randallstown

Owings Mills

Orems

Grange

Villa Cresta

Timber Grove

Winand

Essex

Halethorpe

Sandalwood

Victory Villa

Woodbridge

Bear Creek

Perry Hall

Glyndon 11 Reisterstown

Shady Spring

Battle Grove

Cedarmere

Arbutus

Berkshire

Wellwood International

Scholars K-8

Glenmar

Powhatan

Pleasant Plains

Padonia International

Johnnycake

Oliver Beach

McCormick

Hernwood

Sussex

Dundalk ~

Dogwood

Oakleigh I

Deer Park

Elmwood

Martin Boulevard

Edmondson Heights

Bedford

Norwood

lansdowne

Mil brook

Chase

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 ' 80 I 0 10 20 10 40 50 60 70 ---

BCPS Tier 3 Elementary Schools Grade 3 Percent Students Meeting/Exceeding Expectations- Level4 &5 BLUE: Non-Lighthouse School ORANGE: Lighthouse School

Tier 3 English language Arts Grade 3 Tier 3 Mathematics Grade 3

Winfield Logan

Logan Scotts Branch

Wood moor Middlesex

Hebbville Hawthorne

Halstead Featherbed Lane Academy

Hawthorne Hebbville ~

Middlesex Winfield

Halstead Academy Mars Estates

Featherbed Baltimore Highlands Lane

Sandy Plains Sandy Plains

Mars Estates Deep Creek

Riverview Wood moor

Scotts Branch Colgate

Baltimore Deep Creek Highlands

Colgate Riverview

0 10 20 30 40 I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

This Data was prepared using publicly available data available here:

http://reportcard .msde.maryland.gov/downloadindex.aspx?K=99AAAA

It uses the 2015 PARCC data, and the 2014 MSA data for Baltimore County Public Schools. One note about the data:

PARCC and MSA do not report the precise percentage if the cell is less than 5%. For the MSA data, this number is

calculated by subtracting the other two numbers from 100%. For PARCC data, which has 5 levels, sometimes 2 levels

had less than 5% in them (usually Ieveil and level 5) . For these instances, the other 3 cells (with known numbers) were

subtracted from 100%, leaving a number between 0.1 and 9.9. This number was divided in half, and equally distributed

between the meeting PARCC expectations and not meeting PARCC expectation groups.

http://www.bcps.org/schools/schoolsByTier.aspx

Disclaimer: Every detail on this should be verified by anyone interested in using it, as mistakes could have been made,

and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. ;

Tier 1:

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

0

Percent Meeting Expectations (Level 4 and 5} Lighthouse vs. 3 Non-Lighthouse Schools

PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA, Tier 1

ELA 3

Rodgers Forge Elementary

ELA 3

Riderwood Elementary

ELA 3

Stone leigh Elementary

ELA 3

West Towson Elementary

Are these fair comparison schools?

Let's look at MSA Data for 3'd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014.

Rodgers Riderwood Stoneleigh West Towson Forge

%Basic ~5 (4.5) 7.9 5.6 ~5 (2.3)

% 67.6 63.5 ' 59.7 61.3 Proficient

% 27.9 28.6 34.7 36.3 Advanced


http://reportcard.msde.marvland.gov/downloadindex.aspx?K=99AAAA




had less than 5% in them (usually Ievell and level 5). For these instances, the other 3 cells (with known numbers) were





and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected.

Tier 1:

80 70 60 50 40

30

20 10

0

Percent Meeting Expectations (Level 4 and 5) Lighthouse vs. 3 Non-Lighthouse Schools PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math, Tier 1

Math 3

Rodgers Forge Elementary

Math 3

Ride rwood Elementary

Math 3

Stone leigh Elementary

Math 3

West Towson Elementary


Let's look at MSA Data for 3rd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014.

Rodgers Riderwood Stone leigh West Towson Forge

%Basic ~5 {0.6) 6.6 9.7 ~5 {2.4)

'

% 49.3 39.6 48.5 51.3 Proficient

% 49.3 53.8 41.7 46.3 Advanced

- -- -- -- -----------


http://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/downloadindex.aspx?K=99AAAA

It uses the 2015 PARCC data, and the 2014 MSA data for Baltimore County Public Schools. One note about the data :



had less than 5% in them (usually Ieveil and level 5). For these instances, the other 3 cells (with known numbers) were




Disclaimer: Every detail on this should be verified by anyone interested in using it, ;as mistakes could have been made,


Tier 1:

80 70 60 so 40 30 20 10

0

Percent Meeting Expectations (Level4 and 5) Lighthouse vs. 4 Non-Lighthouse Schools PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA Tier 1

*Gunpowder and Vincent Farms are Tier 2

ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3

Joppa View Elementary

Chapel Hill Elementary

Gunpowder Elementary

Seven Oaks Elementary

Vincent Farm Elementary

ELA Are these fair comparison schools?

Let's look at MSA Data for 3rd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014.

Joppa View Chapel Hill Gunpowder Seven Oaks Vincent Farm

%Basic 11.9 ~5 ' 9.1 12.5 5.3

% 68.8 51.6 68.7 58.3 63.2 Proficient

% 19.3 43.7 22.2 29.2 31.6 Advanced


http://reportcard.msde.marvland .gov/downloadindex.aspx?K=99AAAA










Tier 1:

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Percent Meeting Expectations (Level 4 and 5) Lighthouse vs. 4 Non-Lighthouse Schools PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math Tier 1

* Gunpowder and Vincent Farms are Tier 2

Math 3

Joppa View Elementary

Math 3

Cha pel Hill Elementary

Math 3

Gunpowder Elementary

Math 3

Seven Oaks Elementary

Math 3

Vincent Farm Elementary

Math Are these fair comparison schools?


Joppa View Chapel Hill Gunpowder Seven Oaks Vincent Farm

%Basic 12.5 ~5 8.1 ~5 7.9

% 65.9 61 46.5 62.7 59.6 Proficient

% 21.6 35 45.5 33.3 32.6 Advanced










Disclaimer: Every detail on this should be verified by anyone interested in using it, as mistakes could have been made, • and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected.

Tier 1

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Percent Meeting Expectations (Level 4 and 5)

Lighthouse vs. 4 Non-Lighthouse Schools

PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA Tier 1 * Chatsworth is Tier 2

ELA 3

Church Lane Elementary Technology

ELA 3

Carney Elementary

ELA 3

Edge mere Elementary

ELA3 ELA 3 ELA3

New Town Relay Elementary Chatsworth Elementary School


Let's look at MSA Data for 3rd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014. '

Read- Church Carney Edge mere NewTown Relay Chatsworth ing Lane (tier 2) % 8.1 24.1 20.6 16.6 13.8 12.3 basic % 73.3 58.2 66.2 59.8 67.5 66.2 Prof-icient %Adv 18.6 17.7 13.2 23.7 18.8 21.5 anced











and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. ;

Tier 1


Lighthouse vs. 4 Non-Lighthouse Schools PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math Tier 1

*Chatsworth is Tier 2

60

so

40

30

20

10

0

Math 3 Math 3

Church Lane Carney Elementary Elementary Technology

Math 3

Edge mere Elementary


ELA 3

NewTown Elementary

Math 3

Relay Elementary


Math Church Carney Edgemere New Relay Lane Town

%basic 8 21.5 7.4 13.1 16.3 %Prof- 62.1 53.2 52.9 66.2 53.8 icient %Adv- 29.9 25.3 39.7 20.7 30 anced

Math 3

Chatsworth School

Chatsworth (tier 2) 13.8 58.5

27.7











and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. ;.

Tier 2:

so 45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0



PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA Tier 2

ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3

Chase Elementary Essex Elementary Glenmar Oliver Beach Elementary

Orems Elementary

Victory Villa Elementary Elementary



Readi Chase Essex Glenmar '

Oliver beach Orems Victory villa ng %basi 28.9 20.2 21.9 18.2 21.7 27 c %profi 68.4 70.4 68.8 77.3 52.2 70.3 cient %Adv ::;5 ::;5 9.4 ::;5 26.1 ::;5 anced










Disclaimer: Every deta il on this should be verified by anyone interested in using it, as mistakes could have been made,

and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. ,. It is meant to spur conversation

about the best ways to evaluate the effectiveness of S.T.A.T. It is not proposed as necessarily the best way.

Tier 2:

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0



PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math Tier 2

Math 3 Math 3 Math 3 Math 3 Math 3 Math 3

Chase Elementary Essex Elementary Glen mar Elementary

Oliver Beach Orems Elementary Victory Vil la Elementary Elementary


Let's look at MSA Data for 3rct graders in the sa!lle schools in 2013-2014.

math Chase essex Glen mar Oliver beach Orems Victory Villa

%basic 17.5 13.1 25.4 16.3 11.1 22 %profic 70 65.5 66.7 74.4 66.7 68 ient %Adva 12.3 21.4 7.9 9.3 22.2 10 need











and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. • It is meant to spur conversation


Tier 2:

64

62

60

58

56

54

52

50

48

46



PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA Tier 2 * Summit Park is Tier 1

ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3

Summit Park Elementary Fort Garrison Elementary Lutherville Laboratory Vincent Fa rm Elementary



Reading Summit Park Ft. Garrison Lutherville Lab Vincent Farm (tier 1)

%basic 5.6 11.4 9.4 5.3 %proficient 53.7 74.7 75.3 63.2 %Advanced 40.7 13.9 15.3 31.6











and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. 4t is meant to spur conversation


Tier 2:

64

62

60

58

56

54

52

50



PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math Tier 2 *Summit Park is Tier 1

Math 3 Math 3 Math 3 Math 3

Summit Park Elementary Fort Garrison Elementary Lutherville Laboratory Vincent Farm Elementary '



Math Summit Park Ft. Garrison Lutherville Lab Vincent Farm (tier 1)

%basic ~5 12.7 ~5 7.9 %proficient 41.8 48.1 47.1 59.6 %Advanced 58.2 39.2 48.2 32.6




PARCC and MSA do not report the precise percentage if the cell is less than 5%. For the MSA data, this number is . calculated by subtracting the other two numbers from 100%. For PARCC data, which has 5 levels, sometimes 2 levels

had less than 5% in them (usually Ieveil and levelS). For these instances, the other 3 cells (with known numbers) were




Disclaimer: Every detail on t his should be verified by anyone interested in using it, as mistakes could have been made, . and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected. It is meant to spur conversation


Tier 2:

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

ELA 3



PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA Tier 2 * Woodmor and Scotts Branch are Tier 3


Edmondson Heights Bedford Elementary Johnnycake Powhatan Elementary

Scotts Branch Elementary

Wood moor Elementary Elementary Elem~ntary



Read in Edmondso Bedford Johnnycake Powhatan Scotts Branch Woodmor (tier g n Heights (tier 3) 3) %basic 42.9 30.8 38.5 27.8 38.6 24.1

%profic 57.1 66.7 58.3 66.7 56.8 74.7 ient %Adva :s;s :s;s :s;s 5.6 :s;s :s;s

need



It uses the 2015 PARCC data, and the 2014 MSA data for Baltimore County Public Schools. One note about the data: PARCC and MSA do not report the precise percentage if the cell is less than 5%. For the MSA data, this number is






• Disclaimer: Every detail on this should be verified by anyone interested in using it, as mistakes could have been made, and it has not gone through the kind of rigorous checking that would be expected.

Tier 2:

30

25

20

15

10 ,.-

5

0

Math 3

Percent Meeting Expectations {Level 4 and 5)


PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math Tier 2

*Woodmor and Scotts Branch are Tier 3

Math 3 Math 3 Math 3 Math 3

Edmondson Heights Bedford Elementary Johnnycake Powhatan Elementary

Scotts Branch Elementary Elementary Elementary



Math Edmondso Bedford Johnnycake Powhatan Scotts Branch n heights (tier 3)

%basic 36.4 44.6 32.4 23.7 34.8 %profic 63.6 53.6 57.7 71.1 56.1 ient %Adva !>5 !>5 9.9 5.3 9.1 need

Math 3

Wood moor Elementary

Woodmor (tier 3) 30.4 64.6

5.1












Tier 2:

60

so

40

30

20

10

0

Percent Meeti ng Expectations (Level 4 and 5) Lighthouse vs. 3 Non-Lighthouse Schools PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA, Tier 2

ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3 ELA 3

Lansdow ne Elementary

Arbutus Elementary Catonsvil le Elementary

Westowne Elementary


Let' s look at MSA Data for 3'd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014.

Landsowne Arbutus Catonsville Westowne

%Basic 25 19.8 31.7 11.7

% 66.7 73 .3 63.3 72.7 Proficient

% 8.3 7 ~5 15.6 Advanced












Tier 2:

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Percent Meeting Expect at ions (Leve l 4 and 5)


PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math, Tier 2

Math 3 Math 3 Math 3 Mat h 3

Lansdowne Elementary

Arbutus Elementary Catonsville Elementary

Westowne Elementary



Lansdowne Arbutus Catonsville Westowne

%Basic 28.3 23.3 18.6 11.7

% 60 59.3 57 51.9 Proficient

% 11.7 17.4 24.4 36.4 Advanced












Tier 3:

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Percent Meeting Expectations (Level4 and 5) 2 Lighthouse vs. 3 Non-Lighthouse Schools

PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade ELA, Tier 3


Halstead Academy

Hawthorne Elementary

Hebbville Elementary

Mars Estates Elementary

Middlesex Elementary

Are these fair comparison schools? Note that it was very difficult to find fair comparisons for these two lighthouse

schools. Let's look at MSA Data for 3'd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014.

Halstead Hawthorne Hebbville Mars Middlesex Estates

' %Basic 39.2 35.8 26.9 40 31

% 56.9 60.5 71.2 56 62 Proficient

% ~5 ~5 ~5 ~5 7 Advanced






had less than 5% in them (usually Ievell and level 5} . For these instances, the other 3 cells (with known numbers) were




Disclaimer: Every detail on this should be verified by anyone interested in using it, ,as mistakes could have been made,


25

20

15

10

5

0

Percent Meet ing Expectations (Leve l 4 and 5} 2 Lighthouse vs. 3 Non-Lighthouse Schools PARCC 2014-2015 3rd Grade Math, Tier 3

Math 3

Halstead Academy

Math 3

Hawthorne Elementary

Math 3

Hebbville Elementary

Math 3

Mars Estates Elementary

Math 3

Middlesex Elementary

Are these fair comparison schools? Note that it was very difficult to find fair comparisons for these two lighthouse

schools.

Let' s look at MSA Data for 3rd graders in the same schools in 2013-2014.

Halstead Hawthorne Hebbville Mars Middlesex Estates

%Basic 47.1 37 48.1 36 38.3

% 45.1 51.9 46.2 62 61.7 Proficient

% 7.8 11.1 5.8 ~5 ~5

Advanced

Lighthouse Schools not reported in this way here include:

Mays Chapel because the school did not exist in Spring 2014. If you wish to consider comparison schools, look at the

ranking of all Tier 2 schools by 2015 PARCC data. There is no way to use MSA data to consider possible comparison

schools.

X ·--c C · Q) a. a. <(

BCPS Differentiated Tiered Support Model https:/ /www.bcps.org/schools/tier.html

• Schools receiving Tier I support focus on minimizing the performance gaps among subgroups as defined by the indicators and metrics of Blueprint 2.0.

• Schools receiving Tier II support may have targeted student subgroups needing to show growth as defined by the indicators and metrics in Blueprint 2.0.

• Schools receiving Tier Ill support are impacted by demographic variables such as higher mobility rates, free and reduced-price meal participation, and non-English speaking student enrollment. Schools receiving Tier Ill support may also have multiple student subgroups needing to show growth as defined by the indicators and metrics in Blueprint 2.0.

-

bcps 2015 parcc testing - wordpress.com · 2016-01-19 · school is too new. in finishing up these...

Documents