behavioral effects of unique perspective taking methods in mildly aggressive situations between...

14
Behavioral Effects of Unique Perspective Taking Methods in Mildly Aggressive Situations between Strangers Aviva Bannerman Middlebury College

Upload: delilah-cobb

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Behavioral Effects of Unique Perspective Taking Methods

in Mildly Aggressive Situations

between Strangers

Aviva BannermanMiddlebury College

4 Response Categories

• Positive– Voice– Loyalty

• Negative– Exit– Neglect

Aggression

• Zillmann’s (1988) cognitive-excitation hypothesis

• How can we inhibit aggressive responses?

Perspective Taking

Imagine-Self Imagine-Other

Taking another person’s point of view

Method

• Behavioral differences

• Hypothesis

• Participants: 87 Middlebury students

• 3 conditions

Method

• Imagine-Self– Imagine how you would think, feel, and behave if you were

the other person in each story

• Imagine-Other– Imagine what the other person is thinking and feeling in each

story

• Control– Imagine how you would think, feel, and behave if something

like this really happened to you

Questionnaire

Bumped by a Stranger

While walking down the street, a pedestrian, X,

is texting on a cell phone and bumps right into

you. Instead of apologizing, X acts like it’s your

fault. How likely are you to engage in each of the

following responses?

Responses

• Voice: I’d gently indicate that it was X who hadn’t paid attention but show it was all right

• Loyalty: I’d let the comment pass and hope X’s anger

would soon subside

• Exit: I’d comment on X’s rudeness and keep on walking

• Neglect: I’d ignore X and keep walking

Behavioral Measure

• “Research assistant”

• 8-minute wait

• Out of time

• Survey

Results - Questionnaire

Exit Neglect Voice Loyalty0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Imagine-Self

Imagine-Other

Control

Response Type

Mea

n R

espo

nse

F(2, 83) = 2.40, p < .10

Results - Behavioral

Series10

5

10

15

20

25

30 Imagine-Self

Imagine-Other

Control

Sur

veys

Ret

urne

d

ConditionX2 (2, N=81) = .22, P > .05

Discussion Points

• No differences between groups

• Neglect Finding

• Why?– Manipulation Check

• Future directions

Acknowledgments

• Professor Gurland• Committee Members– Prof. Kimble– Prof. Campbell

• Yuki Shinoda• Joanna Wood• Psychology Department• Senior Work Fund• Tara Panthi - Illustrations