“behind every act of altruism, heroism and human decency you’ll find either selfishness or...

Download “Behind every act of altruism, heroism and human decency you’ll find either selfishness or stupidity. That at least is the view long held by man social

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: cody-lawrence

Post on 23-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Behind every act of altruism, heroism and human decency youll find either selfishness or stupidity. That at least is the view long held by man social scientists who accepted the idea that Homo sapiens is really Homo economicus. Homo economicus versus Homo Sapiens Chapt 7. The Moral Foundations of Politics
  • Slide 2
  • Homo economicus versus Homo Sapiens Harm/Care Fairness Loyalty Authority Sanctity
  • Slide 3
  • It used to be risky for a scientist to assert than anything about human behavior was innate. To back up such claims, you had to show the trait was hardwired, unchangeable by experience, and found in all cultures. With that definition, not much is innate, aside for a few infant reflexes... If you proposed that anything more complex than that was innate particularly a sex difference youd be told that there was a tribe somewhere on Earth that didnt show the trait, so therefore its not innate Weve advanced a lot since the 1970s in our understanding of the brain, and now we know that that traits can be innate without being hardwired or universal. As the neuroscientist Gary Marcus explains, Nature bestows upon the newborn a considerably complex brain, but one that is best seen as prewired flexible and subject to change rather than hardwired, fixed and immutable. Chapt 7. The Moral Foundations of Politics Sidebar on Innateness
  • Slide 4
  • To replace wiring diagrams, Marcus suggests a better analogy: The brain is like a book, the first draft of which is written by the genes during fetal development. No chapters are complete at birth, and some are just rough outlines waiting to be filled in during childhood. But not a single chapter be it on sexuality, language, food preferences, or morality consists of blank pages on which society can inscribe any conceivable set of words. Marcuss analogy leads to the best definition of innateness I have ever seen: Nature provides a first draft, which experience then revises. Built-in does not mean unmalleable; it means organized in advance of experience. Chapt 7. The Moral Foundations of Politics Sidebar on Innateness
  • Slide 5
  • The Moral Foundations 1: The Care/Harm Foundation Cuteness primes us to care, nurture, protect, and interact. It gets the elephant leaning the Care foundation can be triggered by any child.
  • Slide 6
  • A current trigger for the Care/Harm foundation
  • Slide 7
  • Lorenz on the Cute Response
  • Slide 8
  • Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women Glocker et al PNAS 2009 Ethologist Konrad Lorenz dened the baby schema as a set of infantile physical features, such as round face, high forehead and big eyes, that is perceived as cute and motivates caretaking behavior in animals including humans, with the evolutionary function of enhancing offspring survival. Glocker et al carried out an fmri study to test this hypothesis.
  • Slide 9
  • Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women Glocker et al PNAS 2009
  • Slide 10
  • Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women Glocker et al PNAS 2009 Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and controlled manipulation of the baby schema in infant faces, we found that the baby schema activates the nucleus accumbens, a key structure of the mesocorticolimbic system mediating reward processing and appetitive motivation, in nulliparous women. Our ndings suggest that engagement of the mesocorticolimbic system is the neurophysiologic mechanism by which baby schema promotes human caregiving, regardless of kinship.
  • Slide 11
  • Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women Glocker et al PNAS 2009
  • Slide 12
  • The Five Moral Foundations (Haidt) 1. Care/harm: Related to our long evolution as mammals with attachment systems and an ability to feel (and dislike) the pain of others. Underlies compassion, empathy, kindness, nurturance. 2. Fairness/cheating: Related to the evolutionary process of reciprocal altruism. Generates ideas of justice, rights, and autonomy. 3. Loyalty/betrayal: Related to our long history as tribal creatures able to form shifting coalitions. Underlies virtues of patriotism and self-sacrifice for the group. One for all, and all for one!" 4. Authority/subversion: Shaped by our long primate history of hierarchical social interactions. Underlies virtues of leadership and followership, including deference to legitimate authority, respect for traditions and the fulfillment of role-based duties. 5. Sanctity/degradation: Shaped by the psychology of disgust and contamination. Underlies religious notions of striving to live in an elevated, less carnal, more noble way, idea that the body is a temple which can be desecrated by immoral activities and contaminants.
  • Slide 13
  • Liberal and conservative caring The Moral Foundations 1: The Care/Harm Foundation
  • Slide 14
  • Fairness Left and Right The Moral Foundations 2. Fairness/Cheating
  • Slide 15
  • A car decorated with emblems of loyalty, and a sign modified to reject one kind of loyalty The Moral Foundations 3. Loyalty/Betrayal
  • Slide 16
  • Two rather different valuations of the Authority/subversion foundation The Moral Foundations 4. Authority/Subversion
  • Slide 17
  • Two different views of the Sanctity/degradation foundation The Moral Foundations 5. Sanctity/Degradation
  • Slide 18
  • Violations of the Sanctity Foundation Life of Brian Look on the Bright Side of Life
  • Slide 19
  • From Freedomoutpost.com From Birtherreport.com Violations of the Sanctity & Authority Foundations
  • Slide 20
  • Care/ harm Fairness/ cheating Loyalty/ betrayal Authority/ subversion Sanctity/ degradation Adaptive challenge Protect and care for young, vulnerable or injured kin Reap benefits of two-way partnerships with non-kin Reap benefits of cohesive coalitions Forge beneficial relationships within hierarchies Avoid microbes and parasites Original triggers Suffering, distress, or neediness expressed by ones kin Cheating, cooperation, deception Threat or challenge to group Signs of dominance and submission Waste products, diseased people New triggers Baby seals, cute cartoon characters Marital fidelity, broken vending machines Sports teams, nations Bosses, respected professionals Taboo ideas (communism, racism) Characteristic emotions Compassion, empathy Anger, gratitude, guilt Group pride, belongingness, rage at traitors Respect, fearDisgust Relevant virtues Caring, kindness Fairness, justice, honesty trustworthiness Loyalty, patriotism, self-sacrifice Obedience, deference Temperance, chastity, piety, cleanliness