benef study peninsula bay proj · 2017-01-17 · cone entrant ioy using the humphrey spiral...

24
42D16SW8082 2.1470 COLDWELL RECEIVED 010 MAY 2 1974 PROJECTS UNIT BENEFICIATION STUDY PENINSULA BAY PROJECT 22ND MARCH, 1974 MINERALS STAFF CHEVRON STANDARD LTD. 833 - 355 BURRARD STREET VANCOUVER, B.C.

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

42D16SW8082 2.1470 COLDWELL

RECEIVED

010 MAY 2 1974

PROJECTS UNIT

BENEFICIATION STUDY

PENINSULA BAY PROJECT

22ND MARCH, 1974

MINERALS STAFFCHEVRON STANDARD LTD.

833 - 355 BURRARD STREETVANCOUVER, B.C.

APPENDIX

PROGRAM OBJECTIVE Se SUMMARY

The beneficiation studies described in the accompanying report

were conducted in an attempt to locate diamonds in overburden

samples from the region immediately north of Lake Superior.

Geological reconnaissance was carried out in the region by

David Cotter of Chevron Standard Limited. Preliminary research

was supplied by James Trow, geological consultant. Interest

was narrowed down to the area now covered by mining claims,1

TB 33477 et al., and three bulk samples collected at favorable

locations.

As of July 15th., 1974, most, but not all, beneficiation studies

have been completed.

David Arscott

PLAN

•'n )e '-. '

f '

AA'

Grave/ , dark,coarse , W 'M roundtd ; oi Suevite t nordmarkite.

CHEVRON STANDARD LTD.

8FNEFIC/ATION STUDY

SAMPLE PLAW AA/D SECT/ON

D. rt. Mar. Wo. 3

Summary Report of

Concentration of Heavy Minerals

Chevron Standard Limited o i '\ w e u,. uc-.R "f, c .

1. SHIPMENT

Three heavy sand samples were received from Chevron Standard

Limited in June, 1973. The samples were designated, orange - 35,000

IDS., green - 19,270 Ibs., and blue - 1500 Ibs.

2. LABORATORY TESTWORK

Preliminary bench scale heavy liquid and magnetic separation

tests were done on the samples to determine their amenability to such

treatment procedures.

3. PILOT PLANT TESTS

The three samples were all treated separately by wet gravity

cone entrant ioy using the Humphrey spiral followed by magnetic separation

of the spiral concentrates. All plus 8 mesh material was screened out

ahead of gravity separation.

The non-magnetics were dried and separated using an air

table. All the air table products were then treated separately by dry

high intensity separation.

Chevron Standard Limited Summary Report

- 2 -

4. PRODUCTS OF SEPARATION

The tailing products from wet gravity separation together

with the plus 8 mesh oversize and magnetics are stored at O.R.F. The

products from the air table separation were shipped to Chevron Standard

Limited, Vancouver, B.C. for further evaluation.

P. D. R. Maltby, P.Eng.,1 Assistant Director, Department of Metallurgy.

PDRM:jdp ( n H

ONTARIO RESEARCH FOUNDATION M EMO

SHfRIDAN PARK, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CANADA, L5K 1B3 PHONf (416) 822-4111 OR 279-9771 * TWX 610-492-2524

TO: Mr. P.D.R. Maltby October 29th, 1973

Reference: Chevron Project, Work Order 7270

Subject: X-Ray Diffraction Identification of Air Table Concentrates Report X-73388

Three air table concentrates labelled "Green", "Blue", and"Orange", have been examined by XRD to identify the minerals present.The major constituents were identified as:

1.) a plagioclase feldspar, (Na,Ca)(Si,Al) 0 0H O

2.) diopside, Ca(Mg,Fe)Si 206

3.) an amphibole mineral (approximating tremolite or hornblende),

Ca,.(M6,Fe,Al) (OH),(Si,Al) O,,i j i o a4.) an olivine mineral (hyalosiderite), (Mg,Fe) ?SiO,.

The minerals detected in each sample are listed in Table I, in estimated order of decreasing concentration.

Table I

Minerals Detected by X-Ray Diffraction

Sample Major Constituents Minor Constituents

Orange diopside mica

amphibole feldspar

olivine chlorite

magnetite

Blue . feldspar mica

diopside chlorite

olivine magnetite

amphibole

Green feldspar mica

diopside chlorite

amphibole magnetite

olivine

.....continued

Report X-73388

- 2 -

In the process of identifying the above minerals, we separated the "Green" sample into magnetic and non-magnetic fractions using a hand magnet. The magnetic fraction, which comprised approximately 40!^ of the total sample, contained amphibole and olivine, with minor amounts of magnetite and mica. The remaining non-magnetic fraction contained feldspar and diopside, with minor amounts of amphibole and mica.

In addition, a semi-quantitative spectrographic scan was done on the "Green" non-magnetic fraction for all elements with atomic number greater than 10. The following elements were detected:

Si

Ga

Al

Mg

Na

F e

K

Ti

Mn

CI

S

7,r

Sr

Ba

Ni

Cu

Co

Nb

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx.

approx .

approx.

approx.

approx.

2i\L

91

17.a37.37.0.57.0.27.Q.1%

G.06%

0.057.Q.04%

Q.04%

Q.03%

Q.02%

Q.01%

Q.01%

Q.01%

E. Niskanen, P.Eng., Research Engineer, Department of Metallurgy,

EN:rh

r-

ONTARIO RESEARCH FOUNDATION

SHIRIOAN PARK. MISSISSAUGA. ONTARIO. CANADA. L5K W3 PHONi (416) 622-4111 Of! 279-9771 * TWX 6W-492-2524

March l, 1974.

Mr. E. D. Dodson, P.Eng., Chevron Standard Limited, Mineral Staff, 833 Marine Building, 355 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2H3

Dear Sir:

Re: Peninsula Bay Project____Our Investigation No. MP-74307

We have completed the dfy mangetic separation of the gravity

air table concentrates at high intensity using an Exolon magnetic

separator at the following settings:

1. Rotor speed - 100 rpm

2. Current - 6 amps DC

3. Air gap - front 1/4", rear 1/8"

4. Knife edge - front 65 C , rear 88 0

The above C9mbination of current and air gap corresponds to a magnetic

field strength of 11,600 gauss.

In order to achieve best results, the feed in each test was

separated into a 414 and a -14 mesh sample before magnetic separation.

Weakly magnetic minerals were collected as a middling product. The test

results are shown in Table I.

Following our telephone conversation these 24 products will be

shipped to your attention prepaid.

AYours'tfery truly,

t/A ^~d

Ig., \P. D. R. Maltby, Assistant Director, Department of Metallurgy.

THIS REPORT RELATES ONLY TO T (IF PART 1C Ul AR INSTRUMENT. MATE RIAL. OR OTHER SUBJECT REf t R RER TO IN IT. NO RF PRESENTATION IS MADE THAT SIM li All ARTICLES WU L Fit OF LIKE DUALITY. WITHOUT T Hi PRIOR WRITTEN CONSl NT OF THE ONTARIO KFSI ARC H FOUNDA1 ION NO PU hi 1C Al ION IN WH01 F OIHN PART OF Tilt TEXT OR SDHSTANCE OF THIS

Rf PORT SHALL RF MADF.NOFI SHAH Till NAMl OF T HI ON I ARID RI SI ARC H FOUNDATION BE DM D IN ANY WAY IN CONN l C l ION WITH THE SAI l . O FFERING OR AtWl RT ISING OF ANY

ART 1C l F OR PRODUCT. ANY l l SI INC. INSPI C l ION OR INVl SI 1C, AT ION OF Till INS l RUM F NT S. M AT l III Al S OK (IT III II SUIIIK 1 S PI III ORM F D IIY ON l ARID RE SI ARC H F OUNDA1 ION WU t Bf. CONDUCT l [) IN ACCOKUANCI WU H IHl III ST l F C.HNU Al S I AN l) Ah HS IIY IHl (INI AIIIO RF SI ARCH F (IIINFIA HON HIM Nl l l III FI 11 NOR M b l MF'l O Y l l S MIAl L III III SPONSIIIIF FOR ANY IOSS OH IIAMAGF III SULllNIi DIIIFt II Y ON INDIIII ( 11 Y l IKIM ANY 111 l Alll T. l IIIIOK Oil OMISSION

Investigation No. MP-/4307

Feed Sample

Type

OrangeA.T. Cone, l

OrangeA.T. Cone. 2

Blue

Green

Weight

Lbs. %

17.4 100

25.5 100

13.5 100

571 100

- 2 -

TABLE I

RESULTS OF DRY HIGH INTENSITY MAGNETIC SEPARATION

Magnetics

+14

Lbs.

2.6

6.3

3.9

134

MeshI o f Feed

15.1

24.7

28.9

23.5

-14 Meshl o f

Lbs. Feed

9.5 54.4

10.5 41.1

4.2 31.3

177 31.0

Middlings

+14 Meshl of

Lbs. Feed

0.7- 4.2

3.3 12.8

1.7 12.5

87 15.2

-14 Mesh7, of

Lbs. Feed

3.7 21.2

3.3 13.1

( 1.4 10.3

57 9.9

Non-Magnetics

+14 Mesh7. of

Lbs. Feed

0.4 2.3

1.4 5.4

1.4 10.2

78 13.7

-14 Mesh7, of

Lbs. Feed

0.5 2.8

0.7 2.9

0.9 6.8

38 6.7

fitcvrrn

Kicb:.:'mcij C?,'] If ornla Novcr. b c,1 r .5, I'^V^-

ANALYSIS OP STONES PROM PENINSULA BAY, ONTARIO

G. K. WILLIAMS:

Our laboratory has completed the analysis of your set of snail stones from Peninsula Bay, Ontario. The results dr.r-,c-.-'-'bvd bclov; establish that the stones ; .,^;j ( Fapnoar to be silicate minerals. The four lar-.;sst stones (see photomicrographs) were analyzed indi- v:UV.'...l ?,y with tho electron microprobe. Elerental per- co'.i:--,;;3 given in Tub le l (..re means of fj.va measurements at different points on each stone. Values for all elements are expected to be lower than actual, due to absence of the carbon coating usually applied for surface conductivity. The results indicate that the white stones (No, l and 2) are simple silicates and that the dark stones (No. 3 and *J) are more complex minerals. Before analysis, the stones were washed in hexane to remove the oil in which they were packed, but residues of the oil may account for the carbon .observed. - ' : -^ ~

After obtaining the above results, Stone No. l was ground to a fine powder and its diffraction pattern recorded (Table II). This analysis identified the major constituent as quartz, in agreement with the microprobe result. A minor component was identified as KC1, probably present as a part of the stone not analyzed by microprobe, or arising from contamination in sample preparation.

tlc o 3 D. H. ETZLER

JTGilmore:lyEncl. - Tables I and II

Two Photomicrographs

GKWilliams-3

TABLE I

MICROPROBE ANALYSIS OF STONES FROM PENINSULA BAY. ONTARIO

Element

C

0

Na

Mg

Al

Si

K

Ga

Ni

Stone No. 1,* H

3

29

9

Stone No. 2,* #

10

27

"' ' - , "s *

9

Stone No. 3,* 'k

li

21

1

..0.1

3

0.5

0.1

Stone No. M *

4

31

1

2

6

1

*See photomicrograph for identification of stones.

CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA JTG 11-2-72

TABLE II

X-RAY DIFFRACTION PATTERN OF STONE NO. l

ci (ft) Observed

4.25

3.35

3.16

2.453

2.279

2.225

2.135

2.034

1.987

1.819

1.572

1.540

1.409

1.377

1.286

(Of .0 r VC; d

Relative Intensity

40

100

70

10

10

60

*aoxlO

*ao

50

*ao10

30

20

20

d (A) for Quartz

4.26

3.34

2.45

2.28

2.23

2.13

1.98

1.82

1.54

1.37

Relative Intensity for Quartz

35

100

12

12

6

9

6

17

15

10

d (X) for KC1

3.15

2.22

1.82

1.57

1.43

1.28

Relative Intensity for KC1

100

59

23

8

20

13

CHEVBON RESEARCH COMPANY RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA JTG 11-2-72

*- ^^

MAG. Zoo x

CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY

RICHMOND. CALIFORNIA

PR " 22C' r

CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY

RICHMOND. CALIFORNIA

\

M f, L* t ^ pj,jy p R C T t t T

CHEVRON NO. l SAMPLE

(Red Sucker Lake)

The sample site is located in the centre of Claim No. 337482 on a raised beach deposit near the 75p!.. level .

Trenching was carried out with the backhoe and established the strati graphy shown in the accompanying cross section (A-A 1 ).

The upper reddish sand varies in thickness from 2 feet near the Essexite outcrop to zero. This may be in part a depositional characteristic, but has undoubtedly been modified by recent erosion. The sand, which is fine to coarse in texture, carries narrow dark bands rich in fine iron minerals, mostly magnetite.

The much darker pebbly gravel underlies the sand and the contact between the two is usually sharply defined. Rounded pebbles greater than 1/2 inch make up about 20-50% of the total and near the Essexite there are included large angular blocks of this weathered rock.

The gravel contains good concentrations of heavy minerals, particularly iron minerals and pyroxenes. Garnets were seen, but are rare. This layer has a maximum thickness of about l foot and thins to zero away from the Essexite.

The white clay is similar to modern deep water clays now being deposited in Superior. It is varved with silty layers and when freshly excavated it is extremely sticky with a plastic quality, but rapidly dries out and tends to separate along the varves. It may have been deposited during an earlier, higher lake level than the 750 foot level. As indicated on the cross section, the upper surface of the white clay slopes away from the Essexite "shoreline", but it has not been possible to demonstrate that it is an erosion surface.

In sampling this deposit, the fine sand was removed down to the pebbly gravel, using the backhoe, and set aside, the gravel was then shovelled directly through the 1/2 inch screen, until the white clay surface was exposed. About 20 tons of screened gravel was collected in this way from an area measuring about 10 x 7 yards.

l O c A T Tt K

CH C - iMl^fil S T tiMDORDS c TO

CHEVRON NO. 2 SAMPLE

(Lone Pine Point)

The sample site is on Lone Pine Point on the west side of Claim No. in an area of boulders vith sand occurring interstitially.

The sand is dark grey, coarse and well sorted, with very little material less than 1/32 inch, and lies on an extremely irregular peridotite surface.

Sampling was laborious, and required the removal of boulders by hand, followed by screening. The bedrock was washed and the sand collected from the crevices as far as possible. About ten tons of screened material was collected in this way.

CHEVRON NO. 3 SAMPLE

(Red Sucker Cove)

This is in Claim No. 337477. about 50 yards north of the Peridotite outcrop on the east side of the cove, in an area of pebbles and boulders, with minor sand. The location was chosen because of the very inter esting yield of heavy minerals derived from small control samples.

On ton of screened material was collected.

A small sample was examined and provided the following results. In the finer fraction (less than 1/32 inch) about 75% is heavy minerals composed as follows:

Weakly magnetic magnetite 10%

Black Pyroxenes 50%

Green Minerals(olivines, chrome diopsides) 10%

Biotite (phlogopite?) 55?

The remaining 25% of light minerals are composed of 5% K Feldspar and 201? Quartz, the latter usually angular but sometimes rounded.

Garnets are conspicuous in the sample, but make up an extremely small percentage.

The medium fraction (greater than 1/32 inch) was mostly made up of fragments of syenite rock.

DISTRIBUTION OF CREDITS

Two years assessment, or 60 days work, will be requested for each of the following claims:

Claim Nog.

337477 to 337483 inclusive

337488

337492 to 337494 inclusive

337497, 337498

337503

337539 to 337556

Total

No. of Claims

7

l

3

2

l

18

32 claims

First year: 2.0 days x 32

Following year: 40 days x 32

Total credits requested:

. 640 days

1,280 days

1,920 days

/O.D. AKSCOTT, P. Fng.

337494 337491 337490

SUPER/OR

J C (fit rt S on

CHEVRON STANDARD

BENEFICIA T ION

Peninsula Boy

STUDY

Property

CLAIMS MAP Q SAMPLE LOCATIONS

SCALE - A ppro*. l inch - y milt

Figure No - 1

TO INTERMEDIATE METAVOLCA V /CS

Basalt, andesite

Diabase (lava)

MAIN SERIES

Laurvikite , undifferentioted

Laurvikite, massive, reddish stained, hioh barkevikite content

SATURATED ROCKS

Syenodiorite, undifferentioted

Syenodiorite, 'me grained, porphyritic

Syenodiorite, fine yoited, plagioclase rimmed by potassic feldspa

.-•/S TURA TED ROCKS

Nordmarkite, andifferentiated.

Nordmarkite, aphanitic to fine g-oined.

CHEVKON No. t(LONE PINE POINT )

PENINSULA

BAY

le,10 c

Q e too— o -O

' Detention Island

Nordrnorkite, aphanitic to fine yoined, porphyritic

:fCONMRY SERIES - UNSATURATED ROCKS

Leucocratic nepheline syenite.

CHEVRON STANDARD LTD

BENEFICIA T ION S TUD Y

Peninsula Bay Property

LOCATION a GENERAL GEOLOGY

Melanocratic nepheline syenite

'latreille -perthite rock

(Based on O. D. M. Preliminary Geological Map P 1 14)A A Brecciated inclusions of gabbro, generally much altered

— —— Claim boundary

SCALE - Appro*. l inch - /g mile

cIS SECTION 42D16SW0IB82 2.147* COLDWELL 900Ml F: 2.1470

TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS

Recorder Holder

Township or Area

Chevron Standard Limited

Seeley Lake and Coldwell Township (formerly Twp. 78)

Type of Survey and number of Assessment Days Credits per claim

GEOPHYSICAL

Electromagnetic ...............................days

Magnetometer ...............................days

Radiometric .... . ......,.,..,,:...,.....days

Induced Polarization .....................days

. SECTION 86.. (18, 19 and. 20),. see across

GEO LOGICAL...........................................days

GEOCHEMICAL....................... . .........days

Man days |_|

Special Provision

Ai.bonu;

Ground

NOTICE OF INTENT TO BE ISSULD

i l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

j_j Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

l j NO CREDITS have been allowed for the following mining claims as they were not sufficiently covered by ihe survey:

ASSAYING

Beneficiation Studies

3^ Bulk samples

collected from Mining Claims

TB. 337477

337482

337550

Amount expended on assaying

of samples * $29,147.47

Total assessment days

credit allowed - 1943

The above three mining

claims may be grouped

under Section 85 (6)

for the purpose of

recording the work credits of

1943 days

Approved October 15, 1974

The Mining Recorder m,i/ rediicr- tin; above credits il twct'tettry in order that the total number of approved assessment t ,iys recorded on e.ich cliiini does not exceed Ihe maximum allowed as follows Geophysical i'O. Geological - 40. Geochemical 40:

Martinet Lake Area (M-2488)86 0 30

48 052'30- \ x^j" H or* l*. 946B7 (rt.

T B.

M

ITB. (0(858 TB. looseri

TB.

10(846

C L M. 124 G.101928 I TB""OS* TB.'IOUBT l S T B

— *—— i - i wIm-

r ' (* -ATB.P0232I TB.I023221TB.I023ZO TB.IOI857 lg"* \TB.IOI8527M. , , l 9 , g t

2393 TB^C i 3514

101850 T!

TB.

\WutlieSK'!

SK/PP ^rLO*'

1016^69 \ 101891

©T B

299O

ff'* V

W

•••-r •v.. ---- --v.-- 9TB.

I08Z44

101894

^©l 101 B97

^.

V101699

oQz*.s-

110169*

Ot,*** UV 10-OS^-T-iT" M ol'ut l 106099

o rf'

fsr*7- 106100

'9 \TB

l 106107 '1061

J?

6M ; ^V."'

v^ s'

roOJ O)

P

Ox

^ ^ ^Afe///* L

Geordie L. V, o t.

#-'

r/7 o, * ^

TOWER SITE FILE'. 160704

QV

v Croddock Lake6, *c. o

(X^

0*y

k ^|FILE' 142243 '

[|015B3| 103657^1 L ^ ^-^^^-/-*4- -- -i LTB 'TB. ITS ,

l i 101580 i 106983, f '

~™T--/- TB

r\

l

TB~l

'.t0' Q ^7

,—A

37503

TTB"

37502 13375/b.

-- - -L - J: B |TB

9 '

\ \K

V \l GRAVEL

e^F 155192

PROJECTED r

37499 337500 B" ~ ~1T

337496 t 3

*.,

"b

"TB. TTB! ~~ ~ ~\1 l

rsrf*' D.H.O P ARK S ITE , II. 5 oc. PI R 3072

f O07539 [337540 |33754I "gfe^ |337^ ' 3374^ l.

TTB™^"^^^^tTBT5'^ ^ITB *^ B **' '

c^133539 l 133538

ITB.

.^—*1|33749^3 , 337492 1337489

."r* ) ITS,f V ^

l 133540 ' 133541|™----L--—l |374BO,

TB ITS. 557481

|TB,

OJ.33543 133542

|TB 'TB(37/479 l 357482

MTB

)poj3374J

137487

^v

133544 l 133545 g ^7483.

IM.TB, JB

1337477

^

•pE-P

T8

337464

TB

PACIFIC

374BS

— - "t

'

^OM.

133754/9 337548

s-sA"6-ll3!!- ^.™ X

.337545 i337544

l l

0.TB ' m

33754Z337543*ii

^wvi.^0. D. 2197

IT.B^ I TB. ©

, W17I8 V 066C

37534

B Ir^ Cv B ^ ^

V

357S30 37529," v 1337533B~ ~ "/TB

.37528

337527

'337531 '337532,

Craddock Cove

QOOD H OPE i. 'oj

MONMOUTH

BOOMING GROUNDS

FILE; 135770

LL.0.64I6I

yTB. VT.B. (P) \10680I_

IOITI5rta"ANGLER 106802

LPO. a.STA. c

A nglsr

TB. 121205

'J. D !!9ft,

k.C. i Charleroy Pt.

f 12120 ec

Cove

LA K E SUPERIOR

N- ^* ^~s ——— —t'

'iX^ e/n ^x-N —— ~^ \

/l X^ N )f /O-0 " 0"7 X^ /P ^y'E, ; o^^F"*'" s / —O ^^

V ^———^ ?r ry ^ J —-y X—'* 'i-

/ftOP /^ V. r----,---, S e X - ,TB. TB j

6-^X L, i\ ^Ji!057l5 105716 1

y 1 I057l8xf

7 G l (05717 yT \

C PTB "fra- ~ \^T ~\

1 m r V i S

J oy 8

c a7 -3\ o L tty\ } 0..

^v y — "vi, — /~~~—^^^~~* W-L.^--^

6 ^ ————— J

•:^v.%v-••.••^v.'.'.•>;-. t ;•.^':o:^•'.v*•.*:':^•^.'.•.'•:'/>.•^.•|•^%*•%*.^^^*c^^

| M27 {l057l9 1105720

Vx. r^B |TB^ ITB. TV r ~^J i ^112782X1 'V"^ ~? V x' | M2783 1 105^2 i I057Z4S 7 c,ttX- - H - J- -

\ \ I^^li\ '^101578/0 1^3

~[ j TB'TB.y iM i(101224 i 101225

LV - - 1 - - -ITB" JTB,

, V Il03573.ri i ' ^*II03\572 1 x^

fra" T^*m ~ ~

Xp0358';4 , 105733 ^^ (JSfB -\~iTB- ~-

XV \l1 -: 1.1035831 , 105735

1 ' \M^ ••'-"' -'

1 1 1 V\ ' '" ••"'" ~' ! 112789 l II 2788 , / \ ,/ f

-^--fr—s**, \"""'

1 IOS575 ^^112737 | \\ /•-'

iTB^*^"1 T~B ~ ~ ~ "j /L--y "

X ' 1'l '

l 103574 | 105709 1 , \\'™-L-.-.. i \\ITS ITB [ N\

, leo 0 ITB" ~ ~ "1 XV'105734 ^105712 1,05713 ^\

.HT^-———— Tf ——— ^,

1 105736 1 105737 105738 f]

tn - - - r™ - ^ TB- -PROJECTEDf-T-6LiNE- -,VB- - ~* j ji -.— ,.M.. —— Lr'..:-!-: ..Tt-l . irT— m-T-T— -T*T. .-TT-. . A . i . . . . . . . -^ .—i ..i i .Lt.....-— . .W/t —— TT ——— -...-r- -^^i??.i.'. -i^— ...-(.•.v.....-.-.-...-)-.'...---.-.--...!.-.'. -•••-•..

1105721 '105722 1 1 105739Jrr ~~ nfi,~^FB~ ~l 4 ' — " ' "

^- "•"T |1 105725 105726 . 105743

i X ^VT\ T e i TB I TB "Tl l TB T9 I TB\5 ^^l,,^ 1 1!7 so! M

/S. X^-^AXT^V i 105727 l 05/7281 ' 11 105729 105730 1 105731^^^-^^^^jj^r-YiS^.- '---f-U-j-.-j-------

^^~~^^~^ ^^ITB iTBA, TTB. ^TB.\/^ - * l ^^"ss ( i 75|

.^ '(12778 1 112779 ' ' ''*~.J\

/^"^ /- ;TB ITS, iTB. ^t^g^ /45M 1 1 ' '

/^—S -^ G RAVE L

X^ ^'^F 155430 x /^"

1 \

1r j

1^ l C 7~——X-^-

•^ 1 \r/^ ——•ft- \^ 1 S

—5C -^-^ .^^

\

1113777 1112776 lll^775 ! 105757V- 1 i- ITS

|T ITS. ITB.1 ' 'L 105752 1 1057531 V

106754TTB - ~~ TTB" ~ TTB~~ ~ ~

^ '1 105758 105759 i 1057601 1 '

^TB. |TB ,TB. iNX'TS^TB |TB. TT8 . ,

1^ ' ill ! i'N2772 JI2773 II2774^10KV763 | IQ5764 !l05765f\ 105766

T B Tfl Tft TRi i i ''llZ77l ' 112770 l 112769 ,*- - - 1 , 1105769i ~ - -~ L i--1---

l — ——C r. ^— 1 105775

^ — — -* —— ^ ^~^~— — \~ - - -^^-^"^ 1 TB ~-~---..^^

1 -4M i 105781

^ U - - x^V

xX NN ' TeS ST \ ^ '

v ^'V" S l \ /) 105797

1 TB. TB TB1 *ull 105770 .105771 1 105772.

4 - -i. H"^^ ,-TB J l J B ^ TB

'-f**~- — 4 — joSTIvtr''^" — "^ —*F 152691 Ja---VU-S-^l,

105776 "105777^ IO5778("ra" ~~ "ITS". ~ -^tr — ~1 ' 'I 105782 ' 105783, 105784

4- 'ITB jTT ITB1 1 105789 1! .05788' ^J j' 05790

X- ^oiv 9'^ V^ ^ X?H-^ T sTTB - ' TS ' TBT^5 feQ'^#' S S \/^^xCy--0- X7"

^*^^T jMftRATHON H-flPER MILLS OF CANADA \

TSL. FILE: 133500 \t \N^. 1 Nr l ~^^V ^"^ Lei X \ \ C L l 095tJMTC 7^ \ V

• 3M 7 PIT X \ \ L.0.8155

Av 1-522 X /-\ \

1 ' l

' 105794 ' 1057951 1057961 1 1

relTB TTB TTBi 1 1

\^ b 1 105801 ' 105802\I05800L_ J

|\ TB | TB. 1 TB1 \ 1 1i V. 'i05^AP ! 105805 105806

•^.•"..-.•.•.•^••.^:--y.-.-:-\-:.\-\-.-.-:^-:-..:-.-:-.-^^

1105740 ' 105741 ' 105742 ^ Jr\. f* 1^^^-^

-•f5--TTl.---iT.--"! tt// L"wwfc*"d

1 ' 1 f1 ' 1 ^105744 .105745 ' 105746 ' X | 4- ' ~ —1 ^ ft \ I

+TB ITB ,TB 1 ^

! iI05747 l I05748 IO5749 l J]

-\~~--\----L----\ ^^,TB TB ,TB j,^

jyl I05750y ' I I05755 ' I05756 f/ l' TT,- - -f™ - - —— -ftH

1 ' i \^v| 105761 | 105762 N^

* ^ ~ ~ ^r?L^ "~dl-0 - 6792-SO}1 ' ' ; Ci" /y;i i NJ a t. j^05767 1057*8 G BAVEL I K

PH ' I52625T~\5\\ - S",J 1 —— \" \\ f

\jf 1 05773 | 105774 Ti \\

T*i\A/ 1"*) X™7 ^h M 1 r _ - /'T W i^ TB p "l^j — ^ ~ ^^^ \ \ "" v — ..'^..'

1 ' ^^-^J- — N(^L J ) v-ri i ^ mr^^x105779 i 105780 \\ ^*^~I?R~ ~~ ~ITB~ - - — ^\U\

i OOAVEL i, Vil1 ' FlSZfZX M

i 10573^ | 105 786 V J\V\-jr.--yTT.—— -, J

1 105791 l05792GRflVUrft/ l )l Fiszezir3- i ItITB. ^B q/I '/^ 1i 105797 105798 ff V\

HTB ITB f H \\1 ' 7 ' \\' 105603 1 105^^4 \\

ITB .^S' "TB~IT~B ~ ~ JB\V ~i1 .^fiRAVEL 1\ 1

1 ^O*7 105808 1(05809 |105\BIO! 1 \ f " . i H s793.96

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING

SEC 42 OF THE MINING ACT.tR.SQ 1960\:. FILE : 122 8 B

4- - jysRAVCL5262S

riOSBsll ilOSBTT^JJOSaiS

~ -*TB~

IO58I4 1(05815 ^lOSBU

48045; ^9270

SRO.I\ s S r

860 30'Z9 9fl Z7 26 22 1 21 20'

See Detoil Plan Of Ypres Pt.Neuvt Chapillt P

19' 18'

PIC TWRFOR STATUS REFER TO TWf? PLAN

17 16'

42D165W0882 3.1478 COLDWELL 200J.PV.K.

86?I5 (

48 0 52'30'

52

51'

50

49

00^fCNJ

i

aV-<Q)

a

ac

48

47'

48

U— 48045'

860 I5*

AREA OF

SEELEY LAKEDISTRICT OFTHUNDER BAY

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-11X10-1 = CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEG

MINESCANCELLED

NOTES

400* surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Land under water in Lake Superior withdrawn from staking by Order In Council dated April 30, 1912. ___________ ————

LIMITS OF MARATHON IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

SHOWN THUS: tomS&M FILE. 129282

DETAIL PLAN OF'YPRES POINT.

86 0 2T'

l_^__26'

Y SEN PT.

MANITOBA SHOAL.

SEE PIC TWP. PLAN FOR STATUS OF HAWK IMS AND BLOND IN ISLAND.

P f fi in sti le Harbour

44'

SCALE ' INCH ^ 40 CHAINS

- Z. 7^70

DATEOMSSUE

MAY-31974

MINISTRY M NATURAL RESOURCES M II '

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 42 D 16

PLAN NO. M. 1861

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

TRIM LINE

THE TOWNSHi

GRAIN(Tp.79)

Foxtrap Lake Area (M-1719)VlTfcttAi?, ^1^7 . l

DISTRICT THUNDER BAY

THUNDER BAY ; MINING DIVISION

LEGEND

PATENTEDCROWN LAMO SALELEASESLOCATED LANOLICENSE d*

RWHTS ONLY SURF*** WOHTS ROADSIMPROVED ROADS KING'S HIGHWAYS RAILWAYS POWER LINES , MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES CANCELLED

NOTES400 Rettrvt around all LoNt*

to O*pt. of Laird* tt

web T**e*viMJ" f*r withdrawn frbm

PLAN NO.- M.

COLDWELL TP. (M-I92I) CAI A RIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

42D16SWee82 2.147* COLDWELL

Twp. 79 (M-I923I

PROVINCIAL

THE TOWNSHIP

78 •w i *

GF H

fli

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

SCALE:

LEGEND

PATENTttf LAND CMOVfft CAW SALE

MAC*IMPROVED

RAILWAYS POWER LINES

W MUSXCS

400' R*i*rve oroufld

to Dtp* Of LOW**

bf Or4win--*. —......^.i

Htyt atoch Pork rM*rve lho*n ttlft.r'- - ' , .p , . f ' l /--'l

withdrown from stokWg -

M*y* Provincial Rofk

as 9?

'"MA fc^-f^/f'S';-

.^^•;iii i kl - , S ^ '*"

s.**!•' 1:1-'

PLAN

ONTARfO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOU]SURVEYS AND MAPPING