berlin 6 open access conference: jelena kovacevic

7
How to Encourage and Publish Reproducible Research Jelena Kovačević Jelena Kovačević Center for Bioimage Informatics Center for Bioimage Informatics Department of Biomedical Engineering Department of Biomedical Engineering Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University

Upload: cornelius-puschmann

Post on 17-Jan-2015

948 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

www.berlin6.org

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

How to Encourage and Publish Reproducible Research

Jelena KovačevićJelena Kovačević

Center for Bioimage InformaticsCenter for Bioimage InformaticsDepartment of Biomedical EngineeringDepartment of Biomedical EngineeringDepartment of Electrical & Computer EngineeringDepartment of Electrical & Computer EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon University

Page 2: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

CMU/BME/CBI/< bimagicLab > 22

Theory Vs ExperimentationTheory Vs Experimentation

Theoretical disciplinesTheoretical disciplines MathematicsMathematics

Experimental disciplinesExperimental disciplines BiologyBiology

A hybrid is born: Computational sciencesA hybrid is born: Computational sciences Should follow good practices from bothShould follow good practices from both SP falls in there: How are we doing?SP falls in there: How are we doing?

AxiomsAxioms

LemmasLemmasPro

ofP

roof

MITMIT CMUCMUStanfordStanford

HarvardHarvard

hypothesishypothesis

Page 3: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

CMU/BME/CBI/< bimagicLab > 33

IssuesIssues

CulturalCultural Innovation above all elseInnovation above all else TIP Transactions reviewing TIP Transactions reviewing

questionsquestions 1. Is the paper technically sound? 1. Is the paper technically sound? 2. Is the coverage of the topic 2. Is the coverage of the topic

sufficiently comprehensive and sufficiently comprehensive and balanced? balanced?

3. How would you describe the 3. How would you describe the technical depth of the paper? technical depth of the paper?

4. How would you rate the 4. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper? technical novelty of the paper?

Can lead to paradox Can lead to paradox

EducationalEducational Our students undertrained in Our students undertrained in

statisticsstatistics Typically reimplement everythingTypically reimplement everything

DataData We collaborate and data might not We collaborate and data might not

be oursbe ours

IPIP Data issuesData issues Companies and agencies Companies and agencies

protecting their IPprotecting their IP

CollaborativeCollaborative With colleagues within the With colleagues within the

university/company, outsideuniversity/company, outside

Page 4: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

CMU/BME/CBI/< bimagicLab > 44

How Do We Publish RR?How Do We Publish RR?

Not likely to happen overnightNot likely to happen overnight Encourage and reward “good behavior” Encourage and reward “good behavior”

(Child psychology 101)(Child psychology 101)

IdeasIdeas Special section in Transactions for RR?Special section in Transactions for RR? Establish a paper award for an RR paper?Establish a paper award for an RR paper? Form a rough guideline of what each paper should contain Form a rough guideline of what each paper should contain

for an RR designation?for an RR designation? Everything we read is partly “on faith”Everything we read is partly “on faith”

Page 5: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

CMU/BME/CBI/< bimagicLab > 55

How to Make How to Make Papers RR?Papers RR? Used in my groupUsed in my group Compilation of ideas from Compilation of ideas from

Barni and EPFL groups Barni and EPFL groups (Vetterli, Vandewalle et al.)(Vetterli, Vandewalle et al.)

Compendium Compendium (Gentleman & Lang)(Gentleman & Lang)

Freeze the code uponFreeze the code upon SubmissionSubmission AcceptanceAcceptance

““Good intentions” enforcedGood intentions” enforced Students do projects and Students do projects and

reproducereproduce

Page 6: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

CMU/BME/CBI/< bimagicLab > 66

An Entirely NonRR Case StudyAn Entirely NonRR Case Study

Data setData set 15 papers published in the TIP15 papers published in the TIP EDICS category using both theory and experimentationEDICS category using both theory and experimentation Stayed away from standards as well as biomedStayed away from standards as well as biomed For all algorithms, competing ones existFor all algorithms, competing ones exist

RRRR block-diagram?block-diagram? pseudo code?pseudo code? data available?data available? code available?code available? proof available?proof available?

Ratings (0, 0.5, 1)Ratings (0, 0.5, 1) Algorithm and experimental setupAlgorithm and experimental setup

algorithm explained?algorithm explained? data explained?data explained? data size?data size? details on parameters used?details on parameters used? comparison to competing comparison to competing

algorithms?algorithms?

Page 7: Berlin 6 Open Access Conference: Jelena Kovacevic

CMU/BME/CBI/< bimagicLab > 77

Results of the Entirely NonRR Case StudyResults of the Entirely NonRR Case Study

All papers had proofs, none had code availableAll papers had proofs, none had code available Sufficient detail on algorithms, none had a block-diagram Sufficient detail on algorithms, none had a block-diagram Data used, data size and availability all below averageData used, data size and availability all below average Half of the cases were the parameters specifiedHalf of the cases were the parameters specified Comparisons to competing algorithms: quarter Comparisons to competing algorithms: quarter Pleasant surprise: 60%, pseudo-code was availablePleasant surprise: 60%, pseudo-code was available