best available copy - dtic · 21 02 photochemistry, multiphoton excitation, laser microplasmas 07...
TRANSCRIPT
AD
00, TECHNICAL REPORT BRL-TR-2809 DTlC
•I- ELECTE0 SEP i 498
"x " PHOI"TOOHEMIGAL IGNITION STUDIES.Sr11. IGNITION BY EFFICIENT AND
RESONANT MULTIPHOTON PHOTOCHEMICALFORMATION OF -MICR-OPLASMAS-
XI - ...
BRAD E. FOtCHANDRZEJ W. MIZIOLEK
JUNE 1987
,,• ~APKP OVt• K PUIBUC RMW,•!, DiSTRIOUTION UNL INUTED.
::• US AR.Tvff BALLIST IC RESEARCH. LA1BORATORYABk'E RDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND-8- g lo
g 1 09
BestAvailable
Copy
Destroy this report when it is no longer needed.Do not return it to the originator.
Additional copies of this report may be.obtainedfrom the National Technical Information Service,U. S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia22161.
y..
The findings in this report are not to be construed as an officialDel)artment of the Army position, unless so designated by othejrauthorized documents.
.... The use of trade names or manufacturers' names in this reportdoes not constitute indorsement of any commercial product.
:,,5*
UNCLASSIFIED DSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
SForm Approved
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMNo. 070.O188_ Exp. Date: Jun 30, 1986
Ia. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION lb. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGSUnclassified
2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY OF REPORT
2b. DECLASSIFICATION /DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE
4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)
U.6 NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION
US Army Lallistic (if appicabe)
Rejearr.h Laboratory SLCBR-IB6c. ALJDRESS (City. State. and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS(Cty, State. and ZIP Code)
Ab'roeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066
C ME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING lb. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NU-MERORGANiZATION (If appliabWe)
"e. ADMC•ESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERSFROGRAM I PROJECT 1 TASK iWORK UNITELEMENT NO. NO. NO ACCESSION NO
C 61102A !AH43 I11. TITLE (Include Security Ct14sfIcation)
PHOTOCHEMICAL IGNITION STUDIES. I11. IGNITION BY EFFICIENT AND RESONANT MULTIPHOTON
PHOTOCHEMICAL FORMATION OF MICROPLASMAS12 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)
Brad E. Forch and Andrzej W. Mitiolek
13a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b TIME COVERED 184 DATE OF REPORT (=e. tointit •4y) S PAE COUNTFinal FROM Jun 85 Td~e r 8 6
16 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION
Published in Combustion Science and Technology
17. COSATI CODES 1. SUBJECT TERMS 'CO0ftut On =;v;1 "eety S--•"n Mir ALbbi )FIELD GROUP SUB.GROUP UV Laser Ignition, Oxygen Atom Resonances, Multiphoton21 02 Photochemistry, Multiphoton Excitation, Laser Microplasmas07 04ý
19. ABSTRACT (Coninu On 06 it= iP rwouiry and ikti n~jnilW)
;;is is the third of a series of reports concerning the activation (ignition) of reactivegases using focused ultraviolet lasers. The goal of this research is to ascertain the
potential of uv laser multiphoton photochemical ignition as a primary igniter or ignition*augmentation .ource for propellants or their pyrolysis products. In this report, ignitionproperties of premixed 112/02 and 112 /N,0 flows at atmospheric pressure have been studied.Tuning the laser in the 225.6 nm wavelength region has yielded three minima in the amount ofincident laaer energy (ILE) that is required to ignite either mixture. The minimacorrespond exactly to the two-photon resonant excitation wavelengtho for the three spin-
orbit split ground electronic states of oxygen atoms. A determination of the ILE necessaryto ignite both premixed Clove as a function of equivalence ratio shows a minimum far intothe fuel-lean region. Also, the minimum ILE value for the ignition of H 2/02 was found to bearound 0.3 mW, while ignition of the same mixture with the green beam from a frequency
doubled Nd:YAG laser (532 nm) required an ILE value near 13 mW. Additional time-resolved' 04 ,)
20 DISTRINUTIONIAVAtLABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21 ABSTRACT SCURITY CLASSIFICATION
O UNCLASSIfiEOIUNLIMITEO 0SAME AS APT 30 DTIC uSERS Unclassified
a %% ~RIýO111 l'IDUAL 2Zb TELEPHONE (Include Area Codep) I211c OFFICE SYMiBOL301-278 -1SLCBR-IB-I
DO FORM 1473. ea M" 3 APR edition may be u"4e until exhausted SE(VRITY 'kASSIFICATION Of THIS PAGEAll other edition$ are Oblett UNCLASS IF IED
19. Abstract (Cont'd):
p--spectral studies were carried out on 02 and N 0 flows alone. These indicateda resonant formation of a microplasma with a fifetime on the order of 100nsec. All of these results lead to the conclusion that multiphotan
G photochemical ignition is a phenomenon consisting of three major components:(1) the multiphoton photochemical formation of oxygen atoms; (2) multiphotonionization of these atoms to efficiently form free electrons in the laserfocal volume; (3) the formation of a laser microplasma using the electronsformed in the previous process as seed electrons.ý.As such, this new laserignition source appears to be more efficient and ore controllable than thewell-known laser-produced spark (gas breakdown) p ocess and it thus should beuseful for further ignition studies.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................. 5
lo INTRODUCTION ... o..... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
II. EXPERIMENTAL .o..o......... .... ........... .......
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONo...........................................8
A. Ignition. ....... 9...................9 ......... . 9... . ........... 8
B. Microplasma Formation9...................................... 12
IV. CONCLUSION. .................. ............... ....... .... 17
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .. ...... ........... ...9..... 18
REFERENCES999 ... 99. 9 ......... 9999.99................ 9.. ....... 919DISTRIBUTION LIST.... ... o ..... ...... ............
nil ~1n For
trTIS CRA&MO011C TA[2
t Lzb;: . I,1 ,,y r
3
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
I Experimental Schematic...........................................9
2 Incident Laser Energy Necessary to Ignite a Premixed Flowof H /N 0 as a Function of Laser Wavelength in the 225.6 nm(Dougled Dye +1.06 Micron) Region ............................... 10
3 Dependence of the Incident Laser Energy Required to Ignitea H2/02 Mixture as a Function of Equivalence Ratio (a) Forthe Laser Wavelength Set at the Peak of the O-Atom Two-PhotonExcitation, (b) for the Nd:YAG Second Harmonic (532 n).........11
4 Excitation Curve for O-Atom Emission at 777.5 nm from (a)an 02 Flow, (b) a Stoichiometric H2/02 Flame....................13
5 Incident Laser Energy Necessary to Ignite a Premixed Flowof H /02 Which is (a) Fuel-Lean (Equivalence Ratio - 0.6)and fb) Stoichiometric (Equivalence Ratio =
6 Time-Resolved Emission From (a) Scattered Laser Light,(b) Flame 0-Atom Emission at 777.5 nm, (c) O-Atom Emissionat 777.5 nm from Microplasmas Formed in 02 Flovs .... . .... .... 16
5
I. INTRODUCTION
There has been a growing interest recently in the application of lasers
"which operate in the ultraviolet region to the ignition of reactive
mixtures. One such study has described the use of the excimer lasers F
(157 nm) and ArF (193 nm) for the ignition of H2 /0 2 or H 2 /air mixtures
photolysis of 02 into 0 atoms.1 More recently, experiments have been
,undertaken in wtich a KrF (248 nm) excimer laser has been used to photolyze 03Sinto 0 + 02 in the presence of CH4 and H2 /0 2 . 2 Both of these experiments haveinvolved single photon photochemistry. Ignition of reactive gas mixtures which
used multipboton photochemistry was first demonstrated in our laboratory on
simple hydrocarbon/air or N2 0 mixtures using the ArF and KrF excimer lasers. 3
Interpretation of those results was based to a large extent on related
experimental work in our and other laboratories which showed that uv laser
(particularly the ArF excimer) multiphoton interaction with small carbon-
containing fuels can be very extensive and can lead to substantial
photofragmentation and fragment excitation. A particularly illustrative case
involves the CH molecule which upon irradiation by the ArF laser yields
Sground and excited state radicals such as C21, C 2 , CH, as well as the 11 and C
atoms and C+ ions. 5 On the basis of these results, it was not surprising to
"find that a C2 H2 /air mixture required only 0.25 mJ of incident laser radiation
to ignite.
In a recent preliminary study we have observed a strong wavelength
dependence in the amount of incident laser energy required •o ignite a H /02
flowing mixture using a tunable laser system near 225.6 nm. Specificaly, we
found that the most efficient ignition wavelength corresponded to the peak of
the two-photon resonance excitation process for oxygen atoms in the J=2 ground
spin-orbit state. The focused ultraviolet laser not only apparently caused
photodissociation of 02 into 0 atoms, but also, when on O-atom resonance,
required the least amount of energy to ignite the gases. Furthermore, a plot
of incident laser energy as a function of equivalence ratio yielded a minimum
at 0.61, far from stoichiometry. This result further reinforced the
"•4 .conclusion that the laser-oxidizer interaction is an important element in the
ignition process of H2 /0 2 mixtures at 225.6 nm.
These preliminary experiments, however, were not detailed enough to
identify the specific mechanism(s) involved in the ignition process. Ini d e nti fy~o x g e tha toii c m ch n s m s 3 p 3 pparticular, laser twy-photon resonant population of the oxygen atom
states at 88,630 cm-r (10.99 e.v.) can lead to a number of processes including
excited state chemistry, heat deposition at the focal volume due to quenching
collisions, and/or the absorption of a third photon leading to the formation
of 0+ ions and free electrons. It is the purpose of this report to describe
an experimental effort aimed at a much more comprehensive characterization of
the multiphoton photochemical ignition phenomenon. The results presented here
indicate that the ion formation channel is a key process since it represents
an efficient and direct route for the production of the initial free electrons
early enough in the laser pulse such that they become the seed material for
- .~the creation of a laser-produced spark, i.e., microplasma. The primary role
of this short-lived microplasma (ca. 100 nsec) apparently is to be a localized
"source of highly reactive chemical intermediates at a very high temperature.
If the spark is intense enough, then the resultant ignition kernel is
lsufficiently strong to permit transition into full combustion.
* A 7
II. EXPERIMENTAL
The experimental schematic ig given in Figure 1. Since it has beendescribed in detail previously,6,' only the major points will be highlighted.Tunable uv laser radiation in the 225.6 nm region was focused with a 50 mmfocal length lens at a position 1-2 vm above the burner surface. ippicallaser energies up to I mJ/pulse yielded power densities around 10 W/cm inthe focal volume. The water-jacketed H2/0 2 burner was fabricated from astainless steel Swagelock 0.25 in. terminator fitting through which a 0.9 mmhole was drilled. Matheson (Model 620) flowmeters were calibrated by e GCAPrecision Scientific wet test meter for H2 , ?2, and N20 fiows up to 2 LPM.This resulted in orifice linear flow velocities in the 10 cm/sec range. Theincident laser energies were always measured just before the focusing lenswith a Scientech (Model 38-0103) disc calorimeter-power/energy meter. Theemission signals were detected, averaged, and processed as describedpreviously. The excitation wavelength scans were performed manually, andeach emissiun wavelength data point represented the average value for 512laser shots.
Time-resolved emissions were digitized with a Tektronix 7912AD digitizer(7A24 a4plifier and 7B9OP timebase) and accumulated in a PDP-11/04 computer.The response time is ca. 25 nsec FWHM (see Figure 6) due to the relativelyslow response of the EHI 9558QA photomultiplier detector tube. The powerdependence of the O-atom emission intensities at 777.5 nm for 02 and N,0 flowswas measured using a 200 mm focal length lens to avoid the formation o!microplasmas and only to measure the photon dependence for the photolysis ofthose two molecules. For these experimntcs, the Nd:YAG laser amplifierflashlamp energy was varied, as before, to change the output power at225.6 um.
111. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Ignition
Figure 2 shovw the wavelength dependenre of the amount of incident laserenergy necessary to ignite a premixed flow of H 2 /N 2 0. A aimilar type ofbehavior has been found for H /02 premixed flows. The curve clearly shows astrong dependence of the incident laser energy (ILE) on the laser wavelengthwith toree prominent features around 225.6, 226.0, and 226.2 nm. Thewavelengths of these three features are exactly the same as the fluorescencepeaks ut'hih result from oxygen atom two-photon excitation of the grmu~delectronic spin orbit split states Jv2, Jul, and JuO, respectively."- Thisresult unequivocally indicates that the electronic excitation of oxygen atomsis an important feature of the ignition mechanism. Also, the spectral widthsof these features are considerably broader than those observed during theflame 0-atom excitation scans. The reason for this difference will bediscussed in the next section.
The dependence of the ILE on the equivalence ratio for H 2/02 flows isgiven in Figure 3. The lover trace results from the laser wavelength set atthe peak of the 0-stom two-photon excitation, while the upper trace is for thegreen laser beam, i.e., the second harmonic of the Nd:YAG laser (532 nm). Twnpoints relevant to this figure should be discussed. The first is the
8
&
000
p Ml
a Z f4
166
z CWW 0U
. .1U
15 -li . . .4
I Z ý4M
L204
U La•S0 00
- !a
II
0rNN
o u,
00
44
w
0omo
0 w0
N0
0 0 0 0 o 0OCD f-0 N
a.4
10
14.0.-_ IGNITION
13.0 - oC c o o o p o p03 '-
b.
1.20-
~.1.00- -- IGNITION--
Lu 0.80
aa.
0.60-z
0.20-
0.00 jr r0.2 1.6 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.2
EOUIVALENCE RATIO
Figure 3. Dependence of the Incident Laser Energy Required to ignitea U2/02 Mixture as a Function of Equivalence Ratio (a) For
the La-er Wavelength Set at the Peak of the O-Atowa Two-PhotonExcitatioa, (b) For the tNd:YAG Second Harmonic (532 acm)
It
observation that the minimum in the lower trace is far into the fuel-lean
region. A similar type of behavior was noted for H2 /N 20 flows. The reason
for this appears to be the same as before, i.e., the uv laser is clearly
interacting significantly with the oxidizer (02) component of the reactive
flow. Observation of the minimum so far from the stoichiometric point is, of
course, in sharp contrast with the usual behavior found for spark ignition in
a closed bomb. However, the recent report on the excimer laser ignition of
H2 !/ 2 mixtures also noted the most efficient ignition to be in the fuel-lean
region.
The second point relates to the upper trace of Figure 3 where ignition
was caused by the green laser. Not only is the actual value of the ILE much
higher at 532 nm than at 225.6 nm, but also the 532 nm dependence is virtually
flat across a very wide range of equivalence ratios. This type of behavior
has been obsIrved previously in our initial ignition studies involving
hydrocarbons and can be explained by the inherent properties of the laser"spark" (gas breakdown) process. Specifically, due to the sharp threshold
Q associated with the onset of absorption of laser energy, the spark (plasma)
when produced, ii typically much more energetic than the required ccitical
ignition energy. Furthermore, there is usually a sizable blast wave
associated with the spark.9 As indicated in Figure 3b, the spark intensity is
sufficient to ignite mixtures at either extreme of equivalence ratios, and is
clearly much greater than necessary for near stoichiometric mixtures.
Implicit in our discussions of multiphoton photochemical ignition of
H 2/02 and 112/N 2 0 is the fact that the process firsS has to start with the
photoproductiou of the oxygen atoms in the ground P atate. In order to study
this process, we measured the laser power dependence for the production of the
two-photon excited oxygen 4t=s whose fluorescence was detected at 777.5 mý
The reason for doing this is that frequently such a power dependence study
will indica.tte how many photons are iovolved in the process. Experiments were
undertaken on flows of 01 and N 0 roopectively using a 200 Mm focal length
lens to avoid problems ot microplasms formation. Tlies me asurements indicated
that the photochomita:l formation of ground state oxygen atoms was 0
n ultiphoton process for both 0a anid ?20 requiring tuet photons in each case,
i.e.. fot both cag-s we ra.ured a four photon dependence for the 0-atom
omniss ion, This is consistent with our provious moeasurement for ',iOQ whereas
-k for 02 this quantity had not been measured previously. The imti-ication ofthose findings to our ignition studies will bg 4iscussed in tl', next section.
B. Microplasa F.ormation
Duritng the course of our ignition expriments %e began to take note of a
*f-aint source of white light that omani;ted frtom the laser focal volumeregion. The intinsity of this light was cleary wavelength dependent with the
brightest enission occuring at the wavelengths corresponding to the peaks of
the 0-atoam two-photon excitation, In order to study this behavior in greater
detail, te initiated both spectral and temporal studies of these •aic€oilasaa
for 02 and N20 flows using the 50 c= focal length lens.
1Figure 4.a shows the excitation curve for ( atOM eMissiOn 4t 777.5 n%
ther. the 0 atoms w.re thesAelve!s generated by the same laser focused into the
0, flow. A similar plot (Figure 4b) is also include. for nattcent 0 ato" two-photon excitation in a stoichiometric 112/02 flame. Furthermore., twn ignition
12
1.0-
- 0.8
z
z 0.60
0
0.4-CM(J
2 0.20.
0.0
286.70 286.30 285.90DOUBLED DYE WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure 4. Excitation Curve for O-Atom Emission at 777.5 r=m from (a)an 02 Flow, (b) . SLoichiometric H2/02 Flame
13
plots for fuel-lean and stoichiometric H12/02 mixtures ar, given in Figures 5aand b, respectively, gith the differences ia th( absolute value of the ILE
explained previously. A number of similarities and diffexmnces can be seenand discussed. In particular, the spectral width for 0-atoms produced in a 02flow is much greater than for the nascent flame 0-atoms. The substantialspectral width in the 02 flow is, however, quite comparable to the ignitionprofile in the fuel-lean case, while the sDectral profile for the ignition ofa stoichiometric mixture is somewhat narrower and less efficient than the
fuel-lean case. The explanation for these observations is that the spectral
profile in the ignition case as well as in the cave of the 02 flow, is notreally a representation of an atomic spectral property, but rather anindication of a much more complex process, i.e., the formation of a
microplasma, which is inherently a highly nonlinear phenomenon. It is well-established that the laser-produced microplasma (spark) needs seed electrons
in order to grow. In our case it finds them in the spectral wings of the two-
photon resonant, three-photon ionization of oxygen atoms. When these freeelectrons are formed in the early part of the laser pulse, then the cascadeplasma formation mechanism is initiated and the plasma is ultimately heated upto a very high temperature by the inverse brehmsstrahlung effect. 0-12 Thus,when this occurs, it is no longer valid to consider the 0-atom emission at777.5 nm as a simple two-photon laser induced fluorescence process. It istherefore not surprising that the spectral behavior of the ignition ofpremixed gases, a process sensitive to microplasma formation, should besimilar to that of the microplasma prodicing precursor alone. This is, infact, what is observed for the 02 flow and the fuel-lean reactive mixture inFigures 4a and 5a. The fact that the stoichiometric ignition curve shows anarrower width w- '- less efficient as well, it explained by the fact thatthe H2 hampers tK.: ;rowth of the microplasma, presumably due to its highionization potential (I.P. for 02 - 12.063 e.v. and for H2 - 15.427 e.v.), and':hus the plasma is relatively less intense. In search for other explanationsfor these wide spectral widths, a wavelength dependence of the initial step,i.e., multiphoton photoehemical production of atoms, should be considered. Itwould be most unlikely, houever, for such a dependence to yield the similartype of spectral profile which is found for all three spin-orbit components(Figure 2).
An additional parameter that was investigated is the temporal behavior ofthe 0-atom emission at 777.5 nm. Figure 6 shows the time-resolved emissionfor scattered laser light (Figure 6a), flame 0-atoms (Figure 6b), and 0-atomsproduced in the u2 flow under conditions of microplasma formation (Figure 6c).Clearly the lifetiste is much longer for the 02 flow case since it actually isrelated to the lifetime of the plasma with direct laser produced signals fromsimple multiphoton photolysis and the two-photon excitation being a factoronly in the leading edge of the trace.
The role of excited state 0-atom chemistry has not been expliritlyconsidered so far. The fact that a microplasma exists in multiphotonphotochemical ignition implies that laser-populated excited state chemistry isprobably not important sirce the kinetics of the microplasma process wouldappear to overtake other competing processes. Furthermore, we undertook aseries of ignition studies ot H2/O2 flows using longer focal length lenses(100 rmm, 150 tmm, 200 mm) and found that the ILE required to ignite increasedconsiderably and ignition did not occur without the formation of themicroplasmas. On the other hand, even though our experiments strongly
14
1.00-
- 0.90 7E "IGNITION
W 0.80]
W
-' 0.70-
z 0A .00W
z 0.60-
0.50-
286.70 286.30 285.90
DOUBLED DYE WAVELENGTH (nm)
iigure 5. Irucident Laser Energy Necessary to Ignite a Premixed Flow
of 112 /0 Which is (W) Fu~l-Lcan (Equivalence Ratio - 0.6)
and (b) Stoichiometric (Equivalence Itatio m 1)
.15
1.0
0 0.8-z
zo 0.6
0,4-
- 0 .4
0 I a.
0 .0 J•. . .T, .. i-
0 100 200 300 430 500 600 700
TIME (ns)
F~igure 6. Time-Resolved EFmis..ion From (a) Scatterec' Laser Light,(b) Flame 0-Atom Emission at 77"i.5 nm, (c) O-•rom Emission
at 777.5 nm from Nicroplasmas Foru..d in 02Flows
16
implicate the microplasma formati-on process as a key element in ignition, wecannot discount the possible importance of the photochemical formation ofradicals in the converging laser beam near the microplasma. These radicalscould very well be important in the early stages of ignition kernel growth,but after the microplasma had decayed. Clearly, future experiments with highspeed photography, as well as in a closed bomb and with other appropriateoptical diagnostic tools, would be very helpful in promoting furtherunderstanding of this phenomenon.
IV. CONCLUSION
Focused ultraviolet laser radiation is capable of activating reactive gasmixtures through a new, previously unreported mechanism involving multiphotonphotochemistry, ionization, and microplasma formation. The major differencebetween this work and previous work on laser spark formation is thatmultiphoton photochemical ignition provides a more efficient and controllablemeans for liberating the free electrons which then lead to the laser sparkformation process. Due to these virtues, this laser ignition phenomenonshould open up new opportunities in ignition studies. Also, since laserspossess certain attractive characteristics such as beam propagation throughgreat distances, as well as excellent time-resolution, there may be newopportunities for practical applications which require the activation ofreactive systems.
17
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This research is supported in part by the US Air Force Office ofScientific Research, Contract #86-0008.
18
REFERENCES
1. M. Lavid and J.G. Stevens, "Photochemical Ignition of PremixedHydrogen/Oxidizer Mixtures with Excimer Lasers," Comb. and Flame,Vol. 60, p. 195, 1985.
2. D. Lucas, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, private communication, 1986.
3. A.W. Miziolek and R.C. Sausa, "Photochemical Ignition Studies. I. LaserIgnition of Flowing Premixed Gases," BRL Technical Report BRL-TR-2644,1985. Manuscript also submitted to Comb. and Flame.
4. J.R. McDonald, A.P. Baranovski, and V.M. Donnely, "Multiphoton VacuumUltraviolet Laser Photodissociation of Acetylene: Emission fromElectronically Excited Fragments," Chem. Phys., Vol. 33, p. 161, 1978.
5. R.C. Sausa, A.J. Alfano, and A.W. Miziolek, "ArF Laser Photoproductionand Sensitive Detection of Carbon Atoms from Simple Fuel Molecules,"ARBRL-TR-in press.
6. B.E. Forch and A.W. Miziolek, "Oxygen-Atom Two-Photon Resonance Effectsin Multiphoton Photochemical Ignition of Premixed H2/0 2 Flows," Opt.Lett., Vol. 11, p. 129, 1986.
7. J.E.M. Goldsmith, "Resonant Multiphoton Optogalvanic Detection of AtomicOxygen in Flames," J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 78, p. 1610, 1983.
8. A.W. Miziolek and M.A. DeWilde, "Multiphoton Photochemical andCollisional Effects Diring Oxygen-Atom Flame Detection," Opt. Lett.,Vol. 9, p. 390, 1984.
9. F.J. Weinberg and J.R. Wilson, "A Preliminary Investigation of the Use ofFocused Laser Beams for Minimum Ignition Energy Studies," Proc. Roy. Soc.Lond. A, Vol. 321, p. 41, 1971.
10. C.G. Morgan, "Laser-Induced Breakdown of Gases," Rep. Prog. Phys.,Vol. 38, p. 621, 1975.
11. E. Yablonovich, "Similarity Principles for Laser-Induced Breakdown inGases," Appl. Phs. Lett., Vol. 23, p. 121, 1973.
12. D.R. Cohn, M.P. Hacker, B. Lax, and W. Halverson, "Effects of Pressureand Magnetic Field Upon Physical Processes in Laser-Induced Gas
Breakdown," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46, p. 668, 1975.
19
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. OfCopies Organization Copies Organization
12 Administrator CommanderDefense Technical Info Center US Army Aviation Research andATTN: DTIC-DDA Development Command
Cameron Station ATTN: AMSAV-E
Alexandria, VA 22304-6145 4300 Goodfellow Blvd.St. Louis, MO 63120
HQ DADAMA-ART-M 1 DirectorWashington, DC 20310 US Army Air Mobility Research
and Development Laboratory
Commander Ames Research Center
US Army Materiel Command Moffett Field, CA 94035
ATTN: AMCDRA-ST5001 Eisenhower Avenue 4 CommanderAlexandria, VA 22333-0001 US Army Research Office
ATTN: R. Ghirardelli
10 Central Intelligence Agency D. MannOffice of Central Reference R. SingletonDissemination Branch R. ShawRoom GE-47 HQS P.O. Box 12211
Washington, DC 20505 Research Triangle Park, NC
27709-2211CommanderArmament R&D Center 1 CommanderUS Army AMCCOM US Army Communications -
ATTN: SMCAR-TSS Electronics CommandDover, NJ 07801 ATTN: AMSEL-ED
Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703
CommanderArmament R&D Center 1 Commander
US Army AMCCOM ERADCOM Technical LibraryATTN: SMCAR-TDC ATTN: DELSD-L, Reports SectionDover, NJ 07801 Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703-5301
Director 2 Commander
Benet Weapons Laboratory Armament R&D Center
Armament R&D Center US Army AMCCOMUS Army AMCCOM ATTN: SMCAR-LCA-G,ATTN: SMCAR-LCB-1- D.S. DownsWatervliet, NY 12189 J.A. Lannon
Dover, NJ 07801
CommanderUS Army Armament, Munitions 1 Commander
and Chemical Command Armament R&D CenterATTN: SMCAR-ESP-L US Army AMCCOMRock Island, IL 61299 ATTN: SMCAR-LC-G,
L. HarrisDover, NJ 07801
21
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. Of
Copies Organization Copies Organization
Commander 1 CommanderArmament R&D Center US Army Development and
US Army AMCCOM Employment Agency
ATTN: SMCAR-SCA-T, ATTN: MODE-TED-SABL. Stiefel Fort Lewis, WA 98433
Dover, NJ 07801I Office of Naval Research
Commander Department of the Navy
US Army Missile Command ATTN: R.S. Miller, Code 432
Research, Development and 800 N. Quincy Street
Engineering Center Arlington, VA 22217
ATTN: AMSMI-RDRedstone Arsenal, AL 35898 1 Commander
Naval Air Systems Command
Commander ATTN: J. Ramnarace,US Army Missile and Space AIR-54111C
Intelligence Center Washington, DC 20360
ATTN: AMSMI-YDLRedstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5G00 2 Commander
Naval Ordnance Station
2 Commander ATTN: C. IrishUS Army Missile Command P.L. Stang, Code 515
ATTN: AMSMI-RK, D.J. Ifshin Indian Head, MD 20640W. Wharton
Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 1 CommanderNaval Surface Weapons Center
Commander ATTN: J.L. East, Jr., G-23
US Army Missile Command Dahlgren, VA 22448-5000
ATTN: AMSMI-RKA, A.R. MaykutRedstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5249 2 Commander
Naval Surface Weapons Center
Commander ATTN: R. Bernecker, R-13
US Army Tank Automotive G.B. Wilmot, R-16
Command Silver Spring, MD 20902-5000
ATTN: AMSTA-TSLWarren, MI 48397-5000 1 Commander
Naval Weapons Center
Director ATTN: R.L. Derr, Code 389
US Army TRADOC Systems China Lake, CA 93555Analysis Activity
ATTN: ATAA-SL 2 Commander
White Sands Missile Range, Naval Weapons Center
NH 88002 ATTN: Code 3891, T. BoggsK.J. Graham
Commandant China Lake, CA 93555
US Army Infantry SchoolATTN: ATSH-CD-CSO-ORFort Benning, GA 31905
22
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. Of
Copies Organization Copies Organization
5 Commander I NASANaval Research Laboratory Langley Research CenterATTN: M.C. Lin Langley Station
J. McDonald ATTN: G.B. Northam/MS 168E. Oran Hampton, VA 23365J. ShnurR.J. Doyle, Code 6110 4 National Bureau of Standards
Washington, DC 20375 ATTN: J. HastieM. Jacox
Commanding Officer T. KashiwagiNaval Underwater Systems H. Semerjian
Center Weapons Dept. US Department of CommerceATTN: R.S. Lazar/Code 36301 Washington, DC 20234Newport, RI 02840
1 OSD/SDIO/USTSuperintendent ATTN: L.H. CavenyNaval Postgraduate School PentagonDept, of Aeronautics Washington, DC 20301-7100ATTN: D.W. NetzerMonterey, CA 93940 1 Aerojet Solid Propulsion Co.
ATTN: P. Micheli4 AFRPL/DY, Stop 24 Sacramento, CA 95813
ATTN: R. CorleyR. Geisler I Applied CombustionJ. Levine Technology, Inc.D. Weaver ATTN: A.M. Varney
Edwards AFB, CA 93523-5000 P.O. Box 17885Orlando, FL 32860
AFRPL/MKPB, Stop 24ATTN: B. Goshgarian 2 Applied Mechanlcs ReviewsEdwards AFB, CA 93523-5000 The American Society of
Mechanical EngineersAFOSR ATTN: R.E. WhiteATTN: J.M. Tishkoff A.B. WenzelBulling Air Force Base 345 E. 47th StreetWashington, DC 20332 New York, NY 10017
Air Force Armament Laboratory 1 Atlantic Research Corp.ATTN: AFATL/DLODL ATTN: M.K. KingEglin AFB, FL 32542-5000 5390 Cherokee Avenue
Alexandris, VA 22314Air Force Weapons LaboratoryAFWL/SUL 1 Atlantic Research Corp.ATTN: V. King ATTN: R.H.W. WaescheKirtland AFB, NN 87117 7511 Wellington Road
Gainesville, VA 22065
23
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. Of
Copies Organization Copies Organization
AVCO Everett Rsch. Lab. Div. 1 General Electric OrdnanceATTN: D. Stickler Systems2385 Revere Beach Parkway ATTN: J. MandzyEverett, MA 02149 100 Plastics Avenue
Pittsfield, MA 01203
Battelle Memorial InstituteTactical Technology Center 2 General Motors Rsch LabsATTN: J. Huggins Physics Department505 King Avenue ATTN: T. Sloan
Columbus, OH 43201 R. TeetsWarren, MI 48090
Cohen Professional ServicesATTN: N.S. Cohen 2 Hercules, Inc.141 Channing Street Allegany Ballistics Lab.Redlands, CA 92373 ATTN: R.R. Miller
E.A. Yount
Exxon Research & Eng. Co. P.O. Box 210Government Research Lab Cumberland, MD 21501
ATTN: A. DeanP.O. Box 48 1 Hercules, Inc.
Linden, NJ 07036 Bacchus WorksATTN: K.P. McCarty
Ford Aerospace and P.O. Box 98Communications Corp. Magna, UT 84044
DIVAD DivisionDiv. Hq., Irvine 1 Honeywell, Inc.
ATTN: D. Williams Government and Aerospace
Main Street & Ford Road ProductsNewport Beach, CA 92663 ATTN: D.E. Broden/
MS MN50-2000
General Applied Science 600 2nd Street NELaboratories, Inc. lHopkins, MN 55343
ATTN: J.1. Erdos425 Merrick Avenue I IBM Corporation
Westbury, NY 11590 ATTN: A.C. TamResearch Division
General Electric Armament 5600 Cottle Road& Electrical Systems San Jose, CA 95193
ATTN: M.J. BulmanLakeside Avenue IIT Research InstituteBurlington, VT 05401 ATTN: R.F. Remaly
10 West 35th Street
General Electric Company Chicago, IL 606162352 Jade LaneSchenectady, NY 12309
24
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. Of
copies Organization Copies Organization
2 Director 1 Rockwell International Corp.Lawrence Livermore Rocketdyne Division
National Laboratory ATTN: J.E. Flana~gan/HB02ATTN: C. Westbrook 6633 Canoga Avenue
M. Costantino Canoga Park, CA 91304
P.O. Box 808Livermore, CA 94550 4 Sandia National Laboratories
Combustion Sciences Dept.
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. ATTN: R. CattolicaATTN: George Lo S. Johnston3251 Hanover Street P. MatternDept. 52-35/B204/2 D. StephensonPalo Alto, CA 94304 Livermore, CA 94550
Los Alamos National Lab I Science Applications, Iuc.ATTN: B. Nichols ATTN: R.B. Edelman
T7, MS-B284 23146 Cumorah Crest
P.O. Box 1663 Woodland Hills, CA 91364
Los Alamos, NM 875451 Science Applications, Inc.
National Science Foundation ATTN: H.S. PergamentATTN: A.B. Harvey 1100 State Road, Bldg. NWashington, DC 20550 Princeton, NJ 08540
Olin Corporation 3 SRI InternationalSmokeless Powder Operations ATTN: G. SmithATTN; V. McDonald D. CrosleyP.O. Box 222 D. GoldenSt. Marks, FL 32355 333 Ravenswood Avenue
Menlo Park, CA 94025Paul Cough Associates, Inc.ATTN: P.S. Cough 1 Stevens Institute of Tech.
1048 South Street Davidson LaboratoryPortsmouth, NH 03801 ATTN: R. McAlevy, Ill
Hoboken, NJ 07030
2 Princeton CombustionResearch Laboratories, Inc. I Textron, Inc.
ATTN: M. Suamerfield Bell Aerospace Co. Division
N.A. Messina ATTN: T.M. Ferger
475 US Highway One P.O. Box 1Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852 Buffalo, NY 14240
1 Hughes Aircraft Company I Thiokol CorporationATTN: 0.E. Ward Elkton Division
8433 Fallbrook Avenue ATTN: W.N. Brundige
Canoga Park, CA 91303 P.O. Box 241Elkton, MD 21921
25
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. Of
Copies Organization Copies Organization
Thiokol Corporation 1 Brigham Young UniversityHuntsville Division Dept. of Chemical EngineeringATTN: R. Glick ATTN: M.W, BecksteadHuntsville, AL 35807 Prove, UT 84601
3 Thiokol Corporation 1 California Institute of Tech.Wasatch Division Jet Propulsion LaboratoryATTN: S.J. Bennett ATTN: MS 125/159P.O. Box 524 4800 Oak Grove Drive
Brigham City, UT 84302 Pasadeua, CA 91103
TRW 1 California Institute ofATTN: M.S. Chou TechnologyMSR1-1016 ATTN: F.E.C. Culick/1 Parke MC 301-46
Redondo Beach, CA 90278 204 Karman Lab.Pasadena, CA 91125
United TechnologiesATTN: A.C. Eckbreth 1 University of California,East Hartford, CT 06108 Berkeley
Mechanical Engineering Dept.3 United Technologies Corp. ATTN; J. Daily
Chemical Systems Division Berkeley, CA 94720ATTN: R.S. Brown
T.D. Myers (2 copies) University of CaliforniaP.O. Box 50015 Los Alamos Scientific Lab.San Jose, CA 95150-0015 P.O. Box 1663, Mail Stop U216
Los Alamos, M 875452 United Technologies Corp.
ATTN: R.S. Brown 2 University of California,R.0. McLaren Santa Barbara
P.O. Box 358 Quantum InstituteSunnyvale, CA 94086 ATTN: K. Schofield
M. SteinbergUniversal Propulsion Company Santa Barbara, CA 93106ATTN: 11.J. McSpaddenBlack Canyon Stage 1 2 University of SouthernBox 1140 CaliforsliaPhoenix, AZ 85029 Dept. of Chemistry
ATTN: S. BensonVeritay Technology, Inc. C. WittigATTN: E.B. Fishei Los Angeles, CA 900074845 Millersport HighwayP.O. Box 305 Case Western Reserve Univ.East Amherst, NY 14051-0305 Div. of Aerospace Sciences
ATTN: J. TienCleveland, OH 44135
26
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. OfCopies Organization Copies Organization
Cornell University 3 Pennsylvania State Universit,Department of Chemistry Applied Research LaboratoryATTN: T.A. Cool ATTN: K.K. KuoBaker Laboratory H. PalmerIthaca, NY 14853 M. Micci
University Park, FA 16802Univ. of Dayton Rsch Inst.ATTN: D. Campbell I Polytechnic Institute of NYAFRPL/PAP Stop 24 Graduate CenterEdwards AFB, CA 93523 ATTN: S. Lederman
Route 110University of Florida Farmingdale, NY 11735Dept. of ChemistryATTN: J. Winefordner 2 Princeton UniversityGainesville, FL 32611 Forrestal Campus Library
ATTN: K. Brezinsky3 Georgia Institute of I. Glassman
Technology P.O. Box. 710School of Aerospace Princeton, NJ 08540
EngineeringATTN: E. Price Princeton University
W.C. Strahle MAE Dept.B.T. Zion ATTN: F.A. Williams
Atlanta, GA 30332 Princeton, .4J 08544
University of Illinois Purdue UniversityDept, of Mech. Eng. School of Aeronautic$ATTN.: I. Krier and Astronautics144HEO, 1206 W. Green St. ATTN: J.R. OubornUrbana, IL 61801 Grissom 11a11
Weat Lafayette, IN 47906Johns Hopkins Unlversity/APLChemical Propulsion I Purdue University
Information Agency Department of ChomistryATTN: TW. Christian ATTN: H. GrantJohns Hopkins Road West Lfayvette, IN 47906Laurel, MD 20707
2 Purdue UniversityUniversity of Michigan School of MechanicalGas Dynamics lab EngineeringAerospace Engineering Bldg. ATTN: N.M. LaurendeauATTN: G.M. Faeth S.N.B. XurthyAnn Arbor, MI 48109-2140 TSPC Chaffee Mall
West Lafayette, 1N 47906University of Minnesota2apt. of Mechanical I Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
Engineering Dept. of Chemical EngineerinjATTN: E. Fletcher ATTN: A. FontijnMinneapolis, HN 55455 Troy, NY 12181
27
4
DISTRIBUTION LIST
No. Of No. OfCopies Organization Copies Organization
Cornell University 3 Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Chemistry Applied Research LaboratoryATTN: T.A. Cool ATTN: K.K. KuoBaker Laboratory H. PalmerIthaca, NY 14853 M. Micci
University Park, PA 16802Univ. of Dayton Rsch Inst.ATTN: D. Campbell Polytechnic Institute of NYAFRPL/PAP Stop 24 Graduate CenterEdwards AFB, CA 93523 ATTN: S. Lederman
Route 110University of Florida Farmingdale, NY 11735Dept. of ChemistryATTN: J. Winefordner 2 Princeton UniversityGainesville, FL 32611 Forrestal Campus Library
ATTN: K. Brezinsky
3 Georgia Institute of I. GlassmanTechnology P.O. Box 710
School of Aerospace Princeton, NJ 08540Engineering
ATTN: E. Price 1 Princeton UniversityW.C. Strahle MAE Dept.B.T. Zinn ATTN: F.A. Williams
Atlanta, GA 30332 Princeton, NJ 08544
University of Illinois 1 Purdue UniversityDept. of Mech. Eng. School of AeronauticsATTN: H. Krier and Astronautics144MEB, 1206 W. Green St. ATTN: J.R. OsbornUrbana, IL 61801 Grissom Hall
West Lafayette, IN 47906Johns Hopkins University/APLChemical Propulsion 1 Purdue University
Information Agency Department of ChemistryATTN: T.W. Christian ATTN: E. GrantJohns Hopkins Road West Lafayette, IN 47906Laurel, MD 20707
2 Purdue UniversityUniversity of Michigan School of MechanicalGas Dynamics Lab EngineeringAerospace Engineering Bldg. ATTN: N.M. LaurendeauATTN: G.M. Faeth S.N.B. MurthyAnn Arbor, MI 48109-2140 TSPC Chaffee Hall
West Lafayette, IN 47906University of MinnesotaDept. of Mechanical 1 Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
Engineering Dept. of Chemical EngineeringATTN: E. Fletcher ATTN: A. FontijnMinneapolis, MN 55455 Troy, NY 12181
27
DISTRBIBUTION LIST
No. C<Copi Organization
Stu o lrd UniversityDept- of Mechanical
EngineeringATTN: R. HansonStanford, CA 94305
University of TexasDept. of ChemistryATTN: W. GardinerAustin, TX 78712
University of UtahDept. Chemical Engineering
ATTN: G. FlandroSalt Lake City, UT 84112
Virginia Polytechnic
Institute andState University
ATTN: J.A. SchetzBlacksburg, VA 24061
CommandantUSAFASATTN: ATSF-TSM-CNFort Sill, OK 73503-5600
Aberdeen Proving.Ground
Dir, USAMSAAATTN: AMXSY-D
'-XSY-MP, H. CohenCdr, USATECOM
ATTN: AMSTE-TO-VCdr, CRDC, AMCCOM
ATTN: SMCCR-RSP-ASMCCR-MUSMCCR-SPS-IL
28
USER EVALUATION SHEET/CHANGE OF ADDRESS
This Laboratory undertakes a continuing effort to improve the quality of thereports it publishes. Your comments/answers to the items/questions below willaid us in our efforts.
1. BRL Report Number Date of Report
2. Date Report Received
3. Does this report satisfy a need? (Comment on purpose, related project, orother area of interest for which the report will be used.)
4. How specifically, is the report being used? (Information source, designdata, procedure, source of ideas, etc.)
S. Has the information in this report led to any quantitative savings as faras man-hours or dollars saved, operating costs avoided or efficiencies achieved,etc? If so, please elaborate.
6. General Comments. What do you think should be changed to improve futurereports? (Indicate changes to organization, technical content, format, etc.)
Name
CURRENT Organization
ADDRESS Address
"City, State, Zip
7. If indicating a Change of Address or Address Correction, please provide theNew or Correct Address in Block 6 above and the Old or Incorrect address below.
Name
OLD OrganizationADDRESS
Address
City, State, Zip
(Remove this sheet, fold as indicated, staple or tape closed, and mail.)
FOLD HERE -
DirectorIlii'NPOTGUS Army Ballistic Research Laboratory I NECESSARYGE
ATTN: DRXBR-OD-ST N IF MAILED
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 I ILTHED
SUNITED STATES1
OFFICIAL BUSI41ESS I -,.NATV.O.N. .oRSU. "00 BUSINESS REPLY MAILO.
FIRST CAASS PER4MIT NO 12062 WASHIOTON,OC
POSTAGW W-LL BE PAID BY OE•ARTmENT OF TIE ARMY
DirectorUS Army Ballistic Research LaboratoryATTN: DRXBR-OD-STAberdeen Proving Ground, 1D 21005-9989
FOLD HERE -