beth nesmith, school improvement specialist for special ... · • focus should be on videos ......
TRANSCRIPT
I t e m 1
Beth Nesmith, School Improvement Specialist for Special Education [email protected] 936-435-8243
February 8, 2018
1. Progress in the General Curriculum (PGC) Resources – Enclosure
The Progress in the General Curriculum (PGC) website and resources are continuing to be updated and new materials are being added to the website as approved by the Texas Education Agency (TEA).
New/revised resources include:
1. Individualized Education Plan (IEP) Question and Answer Document, December 20172. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Infographic/Quick Guide, December 20173. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Question and Answer Document, January 20184. Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Settings document, LRE tab5. Online Goal Development in Texas Training, 2017-2018, flyer enclosed
A five-slide powerpoint is included in the agenda that provides notes concerning the PGC website revisions. The last slide includes a time line for updating the website and resources.
The PGC website is found at www.texaspgc.net and will be previewed at the meeting.
This online training module, a joint project of the Progress in the General Curriculum Statewide Network and Texas Education Agency, focuses on the portion of the ARD process related to developing a student's Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP), using the PLAAFP to create enrolled grade level measurable annual academic goals, and progress monitoring.
www.texaspgc.net For more information, please contact: Cara Wyly | Project Manager (210) [email protected]
IEP Goal Development in Texas Online Training
2017-2018
Self-Paced 2-3 hours to complete
SESSION ID#: 49038
COST: Free
TO REGISTER: 1. Go to www.esc20.net and click on the section titled Connect202. Enter the SESSION ID or KEYWORD into the search box.3. If you do not have a Connect20 account you will be prompted to create one.All sessions will be held at ESC-20 unless otherwise indicated.
The intended audience is general and special educators who are involved in the ARD/IEP process, but other personnel, including parents, are welcome to participate.
December 2017
PGC Website Revisions
Main takeaways: • “De-special ed” the site • Make it appealing to general ed • Organize around stakeholder groups (sped
teachers, gen ed teachers, administrators, parents, etc)
• Focus should be on videos and strategies
Website Tab Example
• General Ed – Sped glossary – Sped 101
• Continuum of services • Inclusion in action • Roles and responsibilities • Grading and PM • Working with sped staff • How to read and IEP • Accommodations/modific
ations
• Administrator – Scheduling – Strategies – Laws – Court cases – TEA updates – TTESS – Sped glossary – Sped 101
IEP Goal Development Online Course
• Due to technical issues session # 43804 has been closed www.esc20.net
• The new session # is 49038 • Website has been updated and flyer sent to
network
PGC Resources Updates Resource Status IEP Q & A Uploaded December 2017
LRE Infographic/Quick Guide Uploaded December 2017
LRE Q & A Uploaded January 2018
Grading and Progress Monitoring Graphics
Reading Instruction for SWD (ongoing project) Graphics
Developing IEP Goals that Connect to C&I Graphics
Specially-Designed Instruction TEA
Working with Paraprofessionals TEA
IEP Implementation Infographic TEA
Co-Teaching Due to TEA January 2018
IEP Goal Development Online Course (additional information and smaller modules)
Due to TEA in August 2018
Website Revisions (ongoing project) Due to TEA in August 2018
www.texaspgc.net
I t e m 2 2. Migration from TEASE to TEAL
REMINDER: The Texas Education Agency (TEA), specifically, Derek Hollingsworth, has sent reminders concerning the migration of the State Performance Plan (SPP) from TEASE to TEAL. District Certifiers and Data Entry Personnel must create a TEAL account and then link the TEASE and TEAL accounts by MARCH 15, 2018. A final statewide reminder will be sent on February 15, 2018. For an overview of TEAL and TEASE, go to http://www.tea.state.tx.us/webappaccess/overview.htm. INSTRUCTIONS: Register for a TEAL Account: Go to https://tealprod.tea.state.tx.us/ Click “Request New User Account” near the top of the page Enter the requested information in the required fields Click “Submit” Link your TEASE Account(s): 1. Log in to TEAL using the account created above: https://tealprod.tea.state.tx.us/ 2. Select “Link TEASE Accounts” from the Self-Service Menu 3. Click the “Link a TEASE account” button 4. You will be prompted to enter your TEASE User ID, password, and an optional account description 5. Click “Submit” and wait for a message that the request was successfully submitted 6. Now click on “Access Applications” under the Self-Service Menu (or select the “Applications” tab if it is open) 7. Click the “Refresh Links” button near the top right of the page 8. You should now see your linked TEASE account on the right under the “TEASE User Accounts” heading—Please use this link to access TEASE going forward 9. You may repeat steps 3 through 8 for as many TEASE accounts as you would like to link to TEAL Note: Once you have linked a TEASE account to TEAL, you will no longer be able to login to TEASE directly; you must go through TEAL. Accessing your TEA Applications: 1. Log in to TEAL using your TEAL account: https://tealprod.tea.state.tx.us/ 2. Hint: You may want to add this URL to your favorites list. 3. Until March 15, 2018, your old TEASE account which you linked to TEAL will be listed on the right-hand side of the TEAL menu page. Click on that link and it will take you to the normal TEASE page where you will select the application you want to access. 4. After March 15, 2018, when you log in to TEAL, the SPP application will move to the left side of the TEAL menu page under Applications. If you had other applications that you accessed using the same TEASE account (for example, EDIT+) you will still use the TEASE link on the right-hand side of the page to access those applications. If you had other applications that you accessed using the same TEASE account (for example, EDIT+) you will still use the TEASE link on the right-hand side of the page to access those applications. If you have any questions, please submit requests to TEA Help Desk or contact Derek Hollingsworth, TEA, Division of Special Education, 512-463-9414
I t e m 3 3. Significant Disproportionality – Enclosure
Districts received the first round of reporting for the new federal significant disproportionality (SD) indicators for representation and placement through the Performance-Based Monitoring System (PBMAS). The reports for the five new discipline indicators were received through the Data Validation Monitoring (DVM) system. Six (6) districts in Region 6 were over the 2.5 threshold for Indicator #11 Sped Representation for the following reasons. *Hispanic Intellectual Disabilities (ID) *Hispanic Autism (AU) *Asian Autism (AU) *White Autism (AU) *African-American Representation, four (4) districts Districts that were over the threshold for discipline were reported for the past two years. The numbers for Region 6 districts were: *2017 Eleven (11) total; Five (5) SD (Year 1) *2018 Eight (8) total; Two (2) SD (Year 2) *2017 and 2018 Six (6) (SD 2) The seven (7) districts that were SD (Year 1) for discipline either in 2017 or 2018 included each of the five discipline indicators. The six (6) districts that were SD (Year 2) for discipline for 2017 and 2018 included Indicators #1 and #5. # 1 Sped OSS and Expulsion < = 10 days # 2 Sped OSS and Expulsion > = 10 days # 3 Sped ISS < = 10 days # 4 Sped ISS > = 10 days # 5 Sped Total Disciplinary Removals All districts that were SD (Year 1) or (Year 2) for discipline exceeded the threshold due to the African-American racial/ethnic group. Included in the agenda are sample reports that will be reviewed at the meeting.
Regi on ZZ
2017 I NDI CATOR2017 2017 2017 2017 2016 2016 2015 2015 PERFORMANCE
I NDI CATOR PL 0 CUT POI NTS DI STRI CT RATE NUMERATOR DENOMI NATOR NUMERATOR DENOMI NATOR NUMERATOR DENOMI NATOR LEVEL
7. SPED REGULAR CLASS <40% RATE ( AGES 6- 21) SETTI NGS SPED SETTI NGS SPED<40% STUDENTS <40% STUDENTS
ALL STUDENTS 0 - 10. 0 14. 9 933 6, 263 873 6, 160 1
SETTI NGS ASI AN<40% SPED
( i i i ) ASI AN 38. 8 19 49OTHER OTHER
<40% SPED ALL OTHER STUDENTS 14. 7 914 6, 214
SD THRESHOLDSI GNI FI CANT DI SPROPORTI ONALI TY RI SK RATI O >2. 5 2. 6 SD ( YEAR 1)
8. SPED SEPARATE SETTI NGS ( AGES 6- 21) SEPARATE SPEDSTATE RATE SETTI NGS STUDENTS
ALL STUDENTS 0. 5 2. 6 164 6, 263 Repor t Onl y
WHI TE WHI TESEPARATE SPED
( v i ) WHI TE 6. 3 44 699OTHER OTHER
SEPARATE SPED ALL OTHER STUDENTS 2. 2 120 5, 564
SD THRESHOLDSI GNI FI CANT DI SPROPORTI ONALI TY RI SK RATI O >2. 5 2. 9 SD ( YEAR 1)
9. SPED ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE ( GRADES 7- 12) | - - - - - - - - 2015- 16 - - - - - - - | | - - - - - - - - 2014- 15 - - - - - - - | | - - - - - - - - 2013- 14 - - - - - - - |DROPOUTS ATTEND DROPOUTS ATTEND DROPOUTS ATTEND
0 - 1. 8 2. 1 31 1, 478 28 1, 489 15 1, 501 1
10. SPED GRADUATI ON RATE | - - - - - - - - 2015- 16 - - - - - - - | | - - - - - - - - 2014- 15 - - - - - - - | | - - - - - - - - 2013- 14 - - - - - - - |GRADUATES CLASS GRADUATES CLASS GRADUATES CLASS
80. 0 - 100 65. 1 375 576 380 566 377 561 2
11. SPED REPRESENTATI ON SPED ALLSTUDENTS STUDENTS
7, 043 87, 422
( i v) SPED AFRI CAN AMERI CANAFR AM AFR AM
ED SPED SPED AFRI CAN AMERI CAN EMOTI ONAL DI STURBANCE 6. 9 132 1, 927
OTHER OTHERED SPED
ALL OTHER SPED EMOTI ONAL DI STURBANCE 2. 7 137 5, 116SD THRESHOLD
SI GNI FI CANT DI SPROPORTI ONALI TY RI SK RATI O >2. 5 2. 6 SD ( YEAR 1)
2017 PERFORMANCE- BASED MONI TORI NG ANALYSI S SYSTEMCount y- Di st r i ct Number : 000000Di st r i ct Name: EXAMPLE LEA
C O N F I D E N T I A LTexas Educat i on Agency
20167PERFORMANCE- BASED MONI TORI NG ANALYSI S SYSTEM
C O N F I D E N T I A LTexas Educat i on Agency
Det ai l ed i nf or mat i on on t he assi gnment of per f or mance l evel s can be f ound i n t he ‘ 2017 PBMAS Manual ’ at ht t p: / / t ea. t exas. gov/ pbm/ PBMASManual s. aspx. For per f or mance l evel s assi gned t hr ough Requi r ed I mpr ovement and Speci al Anal ysi s ( ot her t han NA SA wher e appl i cabl e) , bot h cur r ent and pr evi ous year s’ di st r i ct r at es ar e pr esent ed. Requi r ed I mpr ovement f or t he STAAR® per f or mance i ndi cat or s measur es i mpr ovement s i n di st r i ct s ' r at es r egar dl ess of changes t o st udent s' i ndi vi dual passi ng st andar ds. For SPED I ndi cat or s #7, #8, and #11, dat a per t ai ni ng t o si gni f i cant di spr opor t i onal i t y ( SD) ar e pr ovi ded onl y f or di st r i ct s t hat exceed t he est abl i shed SD t hr eshol d.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
SPECI AL EDUCATI ON
PERFORMANCE LEVEL SUMMARY Regi on ZZ( NOT I NCLUDI NG REPORT ONLY I NDI CATORS)
BE/ ESL ESSA SPED
LEP NOT LEP ALL CTE CTE CTE TI TLE 1 ALL SPEDSTAAR® 3- 8 PASSI NG RATE BE ESL SERVED YAE CTE LEP ED SPED PART A MI GRANT SPED YAE MATHEMATI CS 0 1 0 0 2 0 RI 1 0 READI NG 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 SCI ENCE 2 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 SOCI AL STUDI ES 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 WRI TI NG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
STAAR® EOC PASSI NG RATE LEP MATHEMATI CS 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 SCI ENCE 3 0 3 1 2 3 3 3 SOCI AL STUDI ES 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 ENGLI SH LANGUAGE ARTS 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2
SPED STAAR® ALTERNATE 2 PARTI CI PATI ON RATE 0
TELPAS READI NG BEGI NNI NG PROFI CI ENCY RATE
TELPAS COMPOSI TE RATI NG LEVELS FOR STUDENTS I N U. S.SCHOOLS MULTI PLE YEARS
ANNUAL DROPOUT RATE NA 0 1GRADUATI ON RATE NA 2 0 2
CTE NONTRADI TI ONAL COURSE COMPLETI ON RATE MALES FEMALES
SPED REGULAR EARLY CHI LDHOOD PROGRAM RATE ( AGES 3- 5) 2SPED REGULAR CLASS ≥80% RATE ( AGES 6- 21) 0SPED REGULAR CLASS <40% RATE ( AGES 6- 21) 1 ASI AN SD ( YEAR 1)SPED SEPARATE SETTI NGS RATE ( AGES 6- 21) WHI TE SD YEAR ( 1)
SPED REPRESENTATI ON AFRI CAN AMERI CAN EMOTI ONAL DI STURBANCE SD ( YEAR 1)
STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN ( SPP) COMPLI ANCE I NDI CATORS Wi l l be r epor t ed on 9/ 20/ 2017VALI D, RELI ABLE, AND TI MELY DATA Wi l l be r epor t ed on 9/ 20/ 2017STATUS OF UNCORRECTED NONCOMPLI ANCE Wi l l be r epor t ed on 9/ 20/ 2017FI NANCI AL AUDI TS Wi l l be r epor t ed on 9/ 20/ 2017
Det ai l ed i nf or mat i on on t he assi gnment of per f or mance l evel s can be f ound i n t he ‘ 2017 PBMAS Manual ’ at ht t p: / / t ea. t exas. gov/ pbm/ PBMASManual s. aspx.
Count y- Di st r i ct Number : 000000Di st r i ct Name: EXAMPLE LEA
0
00
CTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1
0
For i nf or mat i on about t he f our i ndi cat or s bel ow, vi si t " ht t p: / / t ea. t exas. gov/ Academi cs/ Speci al _St udent _Popul at i ons/ Dat a_and_Repor t s/ Local _Educat i onal _Agency_Repor t s_and_Requi r ement s/ #LEA_Det er mi nat i ons" or cont act t he Di vi si on of Speci al St udent Popul at i ons at ( 512) 463- 9414. For assi st ance wi t h dat a col l ect i on and r epor t i ng r equi r ement s f or t hese i ndi cat or s, cont act your r egi onal educat i on ser vi ce cent er speci al educat i on cont act at " ht t p: / / t ea. t exas. gov/ Academi cs/ Speci al St udent Popul at i ons/ Speci al _Educat i on/ Par ent _and_Fami l y_Resour ces/ Educat i on_Ser vi ce_Cent er _Techni cal _Assi st ance/ " .
0 1
Regi on ZZ
2017 I NDI CATOR2017 2017 2017 2017 2016 2016 2015 2015 PERFORMANCE
I NDI CATOR PL 0 CUT POI NTS DI STRI CT RATE NUMERATOR DENOMI NATOR NUMERATOR DENOMI NATOR NUMERATOR DENOMI NATOR LEVEL
11. SPED REPRESENTATI ON SPED ALLSTUDENTS STUDENTS
83 801
( i v) SPED HI SPANI C/ LATI NOHI SP HI SP
I D SPED SPED HI SPANI C/ LATI NO I NTELLECTUAL DI SABI LI TI ES 27. 3 12 44
OTHER OTHERI D SPED
ALL OTHER SPED I NTELLECTUAL DI SABI LI TI ES 5. 1 ( 9. 9) 2 ( 23, 281) 39 ( 234, 181)SD THRESHOLD
SI GNI FI CANT DI SPROPORTI ONALI TY ( ALTERNATE) RI SK RATI O >2. 5 2. 7 SD ( YEAR 1)
From page 11 of the 2017 PBMAS Manual and bullet in Notes section of all SD indicator pages :
Rounding: "The intermediate results for all PBMAS significant disproportionality risk ratios are not rounded. This multiple decimal place precision helps ensurethe accuracy of the final risk ratio value."
(NUM 1 x DEN 2)______________(DEN 1 x NUM 2)
(12 x 234,181) ___________ = 2.73433....(44 x 23, 281)
C O N F I D E N T I A LTexas Educat i on Agency
Det ai l ed i nf or mat i on on t he assi gnment of per f or mance l evel s can be f ound i n t he ‘ 2017 PBMAS Manual ’ at ht t p: / / t ea. t exas. gov/ pbm/ PBMASManual s. aspx. For per f or mance l evel s assi gned t hr ough Requi r ed I mpr ovement and Speci al Anal ysi s ( ot her t han NA SA wher e appl i cabl e) , bot h cur r ent and pr evi ous year s’ di st r i ct r at es ar e pr esent ed. Requi r ed I mpr ovement f or t he STAAR® per f or mance i ndi cat or s measur es i mpr ovement s i n di st r i ct s ' r at es r egar dl ess of changes t o st udent s' i ndi vi dual passi ng st andar ds. For SPED I ndi cat or s #7, #8, and #11, dat a per t ai ni ng t o si gni f i cant di spr opor t i onal i t y ( SD) ar e pr ovi ded onl y f or di st r i ct s t hat exceed t he est abl i shed SD t hr eshol d. I f a di st r i ct ' s SD r i sk r at i o was cal cul at ed usi ng t he al t er nat e r i sk r at i o, t hen t he compar i son gr oup' s st at e r at e, numer at or , and denomi nat or ar e pr esent ed i n par ent heses.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2017 PERFORMANCE- BASED MONI TORI NG ANALYSI S SYSTEMCount y- Di st r i ct Number : 000000Di st r i ct Name: EXAMPLE LEA
SPECI AL EDUCATI ON