beyond 10 gbps j. livas chief technologist core transport business group

12
Beyond 10 Gbps J. Livas Chief Technologist Core Transport Business Group

Upload: bernard-jordan

Post on 14-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Beyond 10 GbpsJ. LivasChief TechnologistCore Transport Business Group

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.2

What is a High Bandwidth Application?

Residential Triple Play

Voice

Standard Definition Video Distribution

High Definition Video Distribution

Games

Business Data

VPN

Storage

Multi-core Processors

Supercomputer GRID Interconnectivity

Remote Visualization

Specialized Applications

Mainstream Applications

LOW MEDIUM HIGH

3-40 Mbps

64 Kbps

20-1500 Mbps

few Mbps

few – many Mbps

many Mbps

Gbps

Gbps

Gbps

Research Data Collection Tbps

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.3

Common Arguments for 100 Gbps

Pro Con

1 Spectral Efficiency:

100 Gbps/400 GHz = 0.4 b/s/Hz

10 Gbps/25 GHz = 0.4 b/s/Hz

(SAME)

2 No physics driver (not a “magic” rate) Not a SONET/SDH rate

3 Op-simplicity: fewer channels to manage

Have more tribs – no ops savings unless tribs outside scope

4 Everyone else is doing it If everyone else were jumping off a cliff, would you jump too?

5 Economics: Relative Rate Electronics (Gbps) cost

2.5 1.0

10 2.5

40 6.2

100 16

Must include propagation costs Relative Rate Propagation Total System (Gbps) Cost Cost

2.5 0 1.0

10 1 3.5

40 10? 16?

100 20? 36?

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.4

Data Rate (Gbps)

Cos

t ($

/Gb

ps/

km

)

10 1

Long Haul

Data Rate (Gbps)

Cos

t ($

/Gb

ps/

km

)

10 1

Intra-Office

Total System Costs

Family of curves for each application space:

Data Rate (Gbps)

Cos

t ($

/Gb

ps/

km

)

10 1

Long Haul

Lowest Cost

PropagationCosts

ElectronicsCosts

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.5

Goal is Lowest Cost Transport

Lowest Cost Data Rate depends on Distance and Capacity

System Range:Cost Driver:

10,000 km

20G

10G

5G

2.5G

1.25G100 m 100 km 500 km 1500 km

Dat

a R

ate

for

Lo

wes

t C

ost

fo

r

~ 1

TB

PS

Cap

acit

y 40G

“Log” Distance

Parallel Optics Electronics Propagation Propagation

Intra-office Metro Long Haul ULH

Now

100G

Under development

Match the Answer to the Application

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.6

Increase Bit Rate or Tighter Spacing?

40GB @ 50 GHz Trade-Off 10GB @ 12.5 GHz

~1-2 years out (for volume)

Component supply Now

> x 4 Current cost baseline

~800 km Optical Reach ~800 km 2 km NDSF

dynamic trim (+$) Dispersion Tolerance 32 km NDSF

4 ps dynamic comp (+$)

PMD Tolerance 16 ps

~2 dB spectrum control (+$)

Power Ripple Tolerance

~5 dB

4 GHz locking/alignment 1 GHz

10GB @ 12.5GHz => Faster cost-effective deployment

40GB @ 50 GHz => Deployment in 0-1 years

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.7

Rx Trace 40G+10G 16spans TW-C 28 channels

-50

-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

1525 1535 1545 1555 1565

Wavelength (nm)

Le

ve

l(d

Bm

)CoreStream:

Flexible Transport Platform for the Future One Platform for all applications

» FEC, Raman, and EDFAs allow CoreStream to handle span designs from 1600 - 3200km

» CoreStream is approved for NDSF, NZDSF, and DSF

» Transceivers for 2.5G and 10G GA today, 40G available for lab demos now.

» 50GHz (for ~3000km) & 25GHz (up to ~2000km) channel spacings

Cost is reduced by installing special technologies only where needed

25GHz systems can used to provide high capacities as 40G technologies become more cost effective

8 Channels10 Gbps25 GHz spacing

28 Channels40 Gbps100 GHz spacing

Channel Counts are C-Band only.

>3000 km, 80x10Gb/s NRZ @ 50 GHz

2000 km, 160x10Gb/s NRZ @ 25 GHz

Up to 1600 km, 40x40Gb/s CS-RZ @ 100 GHz or 160x10Gb/s NRZ @ 25 GHz

Numbers assume NDSF and 8 dB FECNumbers assume NDSF and 8 dB FEC

OADM Nodes

OADM Nodes

Data rates/channel spacing mixed at the sub-band level• Mixed rate deployment likely• Optimize Capacity x Distance for each sub-band separately

Data rates/channel spacing mixed at the sub-band level• Mixed rate deployment likely• Optimize Capacity x Distance for each sub-band separately

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.8

Demonstrated System Capabilitywith Raman

Fiber Type Best mixed 40/10G Capacity

Distance Total Capacity

NDSF 40ch x 40G 1600km 1.60Tb/s

DSF19ch x 40G + 24ch x 10G

1000km 1.00Tb/s

TW32ch x 40G + 16ch x 10G

1600km 1.44Tb/s

TW-RS 40ch x 40G 1600km 1.60Tb/s

E-LEAF32ch x 40G + 16ch x 10G

1600km 1.44Tb/s

• Capacity is for C-band propagation only• Pure 10G capacity is 1.92 Tbps• Distances are ~ 1200 km without Raman

• Capacity is for C-band propagation only• Pure 10G capacity is 1.92 Tbps• Distances are ~ 1200 km without Raman

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.10

Transparent Service MultiplexingAccess vs Transport Rate

Access Rate need not match Transport RateSeparately optimize for cost, convenience

Grooming is critical: integrated L0 + L1 + L?

What the What the Carrier sees:Carrier sees:“Economical transportof a variety of serviceswith a single platform”

100G Channel

DWDMDWDM DWDMDWDM

LogicalLink

LogicalLink

PhysicalLink

PhysicalLink

100GbE100GbEServicesServices

10G Channel100GbE100GbEServicesServices

SONET/SONET/SDH 10GSDH 10G

10 GbE10 GbE

SONET/SONET/SDH 10GSDH 10G

10 GbE10 GbE

...

SONET/SONET/SDH 10GSDH 10G

10 GbE10 GbE

SONET/SONET/SDH 10GSDH 10G

10 GbE10 GbE

...

...

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.11

10GE for High Bandwidth ApplicationsStandards work needed?

10GE LAN PHY

10.3125 Gbps

9.995 Gbps

OTN OPU-2ODU-2

O/HOTU-2

O/H

10.709 Gbps

10.000 Gbps with 64B/66B

Encoding

10.037 Gbps

• 10GE LAN PHY expected to offer significant cost benefit compared to SONET OC-192c (e.g. PoS)

• Expected to become Intra-office interface of choice

– Server connections

– Router interface

• Transparency of Ethernet MAC can be important

• Solution for Transparent WAN connectivity not standardized

– Data rate not compatible with standard framing for OC-192 or ODU-2

– Supported using Agile Wavelengths today using OTU-2+ variation of G.709 (11+ Gbps)

10GE LAN PHY Transparency Issue

©2004 Ciena Communications, Inc. Confidential and proprietary.12

Hybrid Switching is Lowest CostTraffic Dependency

$-

$2.00

$4.00

$6.00

$8.00

$10.00

$12.00

$14.00

$16.00

$18.00

$20.00

0.24 0.7 8Total Unprotected Network Demand Bandwidth (Tbps)

Avg $/DS3(1,000s)

OpaqueSTS1/VC3

OpaqueSTS1/VC3Int WDMNo OADM

OpaqueSTS1/VC3Int WDMOADM

SelectiveWSInt WDMOADM

All OpticalWSNo WDM IntOADM

ES TodayES Today

ES with Integrated WDMES with Integrated WDM

WS SolutionsWS Solutions

Relative$ per

STS1/VC3$ per

100%100%

80%80%

60%60%

40%40%

20%20%

0%0%0.24 0.7 8

Total Unprotected Network Demand Bandwidth (Tbps)

SDH Grooming SwitchExternal DWDM Transmission

SDH Grooming SwitchIntegrated DWDM Transmission

Hybrid SolutionIWSS and selective SDH Grooming

Relative Cost per STS-1/VC3100%

80%

%60%

40%

20% 20%

0%

Hybrid SolutionROADM and

selective SDH Grooming

All-Optical Switch

IWSSIWSS

Thank You!