bhl komatsu vs volvo

Upload: julio-benavides

Post on 30-Oct-2015

185 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    1/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005

    BACKHOE LOADERS

    ProductComparison TRAINING

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    2/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005

    KOMATSU vs VOLVO

    Side-by-side feature comparison has been done with WB93R-5 and BL71

    in KUE in April 2005

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    3/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 3 of 38

    CONFIGURATION

    P-Shuttle T/M PPC joystick for loader

    Mechanical levers for backhoe

    Net power: 99,2 HP

    Std operating weight: 7.400 kg

    CONFIGURATION

    P-Shuttle T/M PPC joystick for loader

    Mechanical levers for backhoe

    Net power: 90 HP

    Std operating weight: 7.680 kg

    KOMATSU WB93R-5 VOLVO BL71

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    4/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 4 of 38

    Competitive scenario

    KOMATSU vs VOLVO

    WB97S-2

    WB97R-5

    WB93R-5

    WB91R-2

    BL71BL61

    7.000

    7.500

    8.000

    8.500

    70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 110,0Net Power [HP]

    OperatingWeight[kg]

    KOMATSU VOLVO

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    5/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 5 of 38

    Operator environment Cab

    Modern design and new styling

    Round glass surfaces

    Excellent visibility all around Wide doors for a better access

    Lower position of the cab: only 3

    steps to enter

    Larger cab

    All flat glasses

    Doors have openable windows

    that reduce side visibility Smaller entrance doors

    Cab position is higher with 4 steps

    to enter: not an easy access

    1.5

    20mm

    1.4

    50mm

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    6/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 6 of 38

    Operator environment Cab

    Strong and protecting roof

    All the windows have a strong

    metallic frame for a better glass

    protection

    Front and rear side windows aremounted without frame: higher

    possibility of damage

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    7/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 7 of 38

    Operator environment Front visibility

    Excellent visibility to the front

    working area thanks to the sloping

    engine bonnet and exhaust gaspipe at cab side

    Exhaust gas pipe and high engine

    bonnet reduce visibility to the

    front working area

    Loader is not very visible

    Less central visibility due to

    mono-link cylinder

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    8/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 8 of 38

    Operator environment Upper front visibility

    Upper window gives a perfect

    visibility in high position for

    loading operations

    Loader is completely visible

    No upper window available

    Loader is not completely visible

    1.220 mm1.110 mm

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    9/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 9 of 38

    Operator environment Cab interior

    Lockable storage compartment

    Better finishing inside cab

    8 all-around air vents standard

    Poor finishing of panels and

    plastics

    Only 4 air vents standard

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    10/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 10 of 38

    Operator environment - Seat Sensor

    Not available The Safe Position seat sensor

    warns with an acoustic alarm the

    operator when the seat is out of

    the Loader position and the

    Fwd/Rev shifter is activated

    This application complies with the

    European Standard (EN 474-3)

    Safe position

    sensor

    N/A

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    11/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 11 of 38

    Loader - Structure

    Parallel linkage Divergent structure: better

    stability and less torsion

    Mono cylinder linkage Possible problems of torsion

    Not popular in Europe

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    12/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 12 of 38

    Loader - Self levelling

    Self-levelling when lifting and

    lowering (max angle 11), ideal

    with forks

    NO self levelling system

    but advertised in the brochure

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    13/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 13 of 38

    Loader - Performances

    Lifting capacity at max height:

    3.900 kg

    Bucket breakout force: 6.500 kg

    (std bucket)

    Lifting capacity at max height:

    3.150 kg

    Bucket breakout force: 5.450 kg

    (std bucket)

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    14/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 14 of 38

    Loader - Controls

    PPC joystick standard (for the

    whole range) Multifunction joystick

    On top: open/close 4x1 bucket,

    de-clutch, differential lock

    Underneath: Speed-up, kick

    down (only with P-shift)

    PPC joystick standard

    Multifunction joystick

    On top: Fwd/Neutral/Rev

    selector, open/close 4x1 bucket

    Underneath: de-clutch

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    15/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 15 of 38

    Backhoe - Structure

    Slightly curved boom

    Telescopic arm looks weak

    New S-Shaped boom

    Excavator style Easier truck loading capacity

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    16/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 16 of 38

    Backhoe - Performances

    Arm breakout force: 3.980 kg

    Bucket breakout force: 6.010 kg

    Lift capacity at full reach (SAE J31)

    standard: 1.147 kg

    with extended telesc.: 938 kg

    Arm breakout force: 4.000 kg

    Bucket breakout force: 6.100 kg

    Lift capacity at full reach (SAE J31)

    standard: 1.550 kg

    with extended telesc.: 1.200 kg

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    17/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 17 of 38

    Backhoe - Digging Depth

    Digging depth [SAE]

    standard: 4.244 mm

    with extended telesc.: 5.314 mm

    Same for BL71 and B L61

    WB93R-5 Digging depth [SAE]

    standard: 4.540 mm

    with extended telesc.: 5.650 mm

    WB97R-5 Digging depth [SAE]

    standard: 4.840 mm

    with extended telesc.: 6.080 mm

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    18/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 18 of 38

    Backhoe - Controls

    Mechanical levers are standard for

    WB93R-5

    PPC joysticks as option

    Standard PPC controls for

    stabilisers

    Mechanical levers

    PPC not available

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    19/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 19 of 38

    Backhoe - Bucket

    Only 1 digging position: no

    customisation

    2 digging positions:

    1) close to bucket teeth: plinth

    digging (vertical digging)2) far from bucket teeth: higher

    force and bucket rotating angle

    1 21

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    20/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 20 of 38

    Backhoe - Stabilisers

    The upper part of the stabiliser is

    protected by a rubber cap

    Stabilisers are adjustable from 2sides

    The upper part of the stabiliser is

    not covered: mud and dirt can

    enter

    Stabilisers are adjustable only

    from 1 side

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    21/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 21 of 38

    Performances - Productivity TEST

    Test conditions, according to KES (Komatsu Engineering Standard):

    LOADER: V-shape loading on a truck (2.850 mm height)

    BACKHOE: trench digging and dumping at 45 - 1.700 rpm

    180,6

    101,3

    155,2

    97,3

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    Productivity LOADER Productivity B/H

    m3/hrs

    WB93R-5

    BL71

    P f C l i TEST

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    22/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 22 of 38

    Performances - Cycle time TEST

    Test conditions, according to KES:

    LOADER: V-shape loading on a truck (2.850 mm height)

    BACKHOE: trench digging and dumping at 45 - 1.700 rpm

    20,6

    9,8

    23,9

    11,8

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Loader Backhoe

    seconds

    WB93R-5

    BL71

    P f Si l t ti

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    23/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 23 of 38

    Performances - Single movement times

    Single times - Backhoe - 1.700 rpm

    2,7

    2,0

    3,7

    3,0

    2,3

    3,2 3,2

    2,52,3

    3,5

    3,9

    2,9

    2,3

    3,43,2

    4,2

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    2,02,5

    3,0

    3,5

    4,0

    4,5

    5,0

    boom

    raising

    boom

    lowerinig

    arm digging arm

    dumping

    bucket

    closing

    bucket

    opening

    swing C.W. swing

    C.C.W.

    seconds WB93R-5

    BL71

    Single times - Loader - Max rpm4,4

    3,0

    1,61,9

    4,2

    2,21,9

    1,5

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    2,0

    2,5

    3,0

    3,5

    4,0

    4,5

    5,0

    loader raising loader lowering bucket roll-back bucketdumping

    seconds

    WB93R-5

    BL71

    E i S ifi ti

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    24/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 24 of 38

    Engine - Specifications

    Displacement: 4,5 L

    Aspiration: Turbo

    Power: 99,2 HP (SAE)

    Max torque: 398 Nm at 1400 rpm

    Muffler with insulation material

    Stage 2

    Displacement: 4 L

    Aspiration: Turbo

    Power: 90 HP (SAE)

    Max torque: 383 Nm at 1500 rpm

    Muffler without insulation material

    Stage 2

    E i F l ti TEST

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    25/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 25 of 38

    Engine - Fuel consumption TEST

    Test conditions, according to KES:

    LOADER: V-shape loading on a truck (2.850 mm height)

    BACKHOE: trench digging and dumping at 45 - 1.700 rpm

    10,4

    13,4

    10,2

    13,1

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    B/H Loader

    L/hr WB93R-5

    BL71

    T i i

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    26/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 26 of 38

    Transmission

    Max speed: 38,5 km/h

    Power Shuttle transmission

    4-speed Gear lever is far from the operator

    Max speed: 40km/h

    Power Shuttle transmission

    4-speed Gear lever is in a comfortable

    position, near the seat

    F t A l

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    27/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 27 of 38

    Front Axle

    Oscillation: 20 (total)

    Double acting steering cylinder

    Remote grease fitting

    Oscillation: 16 (total); the

    smallest value in the market, with

    JCB

    Double acting steering cylinders

    R A l

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    28/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 28 of 38

    Rear Axle

    100% electro-hydraulic differential

    lock, controlled by a switch on the

    PPC joystick

    100% electro-hydraulic differential

    lock, controlled by a small pedal

    very close to brakes. It can beengaged accidentally

    H d li S t

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    29/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 29 of 38

    Hydraulics - System

    Komatsu CLSS (Closed Load

    Sensing System) : more power to

    the working equipment at any

    engine rpm

    LIFD (Load Independent FlowDivider): the system forces the oil

    to all circuits regardless the

    different load

    One valve for loader and backhoe

    Closed center, Load sensing

    LIFD inside

    One valve for loader and backhoe

    Simi lar to Kom atsu system

    CLSS CLSS

    H d li P

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    30/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 30 of 38

    Hydraulics - Pump

    Variable displacement piston

    pump Flow: 165 l/min

    Pressure: 250 bar

    Hydraulic power: 92 Hp

    Variable displacement piston

    pump Flow: 160 l/min

    Pressure: 250 bar

    Hydraulic power: 89 Hp

    H dra lics Working modes

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    31/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 31 of 38

    Hydraulics - Working modes

    Backhoe

    Power: max hydraulic power

    available

    Economy: finishing works and

    fuel saving

    Loader

    Speed Up: increases speed of

    15%

    No working modes available

    Power/Economy

    switch

    Speed-Up switch

    N/A

    Serviceability Accessibility

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    32/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 32 of 38

    Serviceability - Accessibility

    One piece fully tiltable bonnet

    There is a large knob to open the

    bonnet

    All checks and filters are well

    grouped and easy to reach

    Maintenance is possible also with

    the loader arm lowered

    One piece tiltable bonnet with

    internal insulation

    There is no handle to raise the

    bonnet Filters are on the right and checks

    on the left

    Engine is difficult to reach when

    loader arm is lowered

    Serviceability Toolbox & Battery

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    33/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 33 of 38

    Serviceability - Toolbox & Battery

    Lockable compartment, on the

    side

    Wide toolbox, separate from thebattery area

    Lockable in open position

    Interval for hydraulic oil

    replacement : 2000 hours

    Toolbox: smaller

    Battery is located on a sliding

    drawer under the toolbox

    Interval for hydraulic oil

    replacement: 1000 hours

    Serviceability Fuel tank

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    34/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 34 of 38

    Serviceability Fuel tank

    Capacity: 150 liters

    Low position: easy to refill, alsowith poly-tanks

    Strainer is standard

    The top of the tank its a very wide

    step for cab entrance

    Capacity: 120 liters

    Higher position vs Komatsu

    Not wide feet space over the tank

    Serviceability Radiator

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    35/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 35 of 38

    Serviceability - Radiator

    2 different radiators, one in front

    to the other

    Hydraulic oil radiator is tiltable:

    system used by Komatsu in thepast

    More complicate to clean

    1 radiator, with 3 separate

    sections side-by-side, aluminum

    type (T/M oil, engine water,

    hydraulic oil)

    Easy to clean

    Better structure and quality

    Radiator is mounted on 4 elastic

    supports

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    36/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 36 of 38

    Best Selling Features vs VOLVO 1/2 LOADER, superior performances:

    Stronger loader structure, with less torsion

    +24% lifting capacity

    +19% bucket breakout force

    +16% productivity

    +16% faster cycle time

    self levelling

    BACKHOE, superior performances:

    +35% lifting capacity

    +14% digging depth for WB97R-5; +8% for WB93R-5

    +4% productivity

    +20% faster cycle time

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    37/38

    KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 37 of 38

    Best Selling Features vs VOLVO 2/2 Engine: +10% power and higher torque

    Better visibility (front and upper)

    Better styling, ergonomics and comfort of the cab

    Larger cab

    PPC servo-controls for backhoe are not available for Volvo

    Working modes for loader and backhoe (Speed-Up and Power &Economy). Not available for Volvo

    Fuel tank: +25% capacity and easy-to-refill

    Longer (double) hydraulic oil change interval

  • 7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo

    38/38

    Please consider this Training for use internal

    only to KOMATSU Sales Network.