Bibliography

Albert, D. Z. (1992): Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridge MA)

Albert, D. Z. (1994): Bohm’s Alternative to Quantum Theory, ScientificAmerican, May 1994

Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982): Experimental Test of Bell’sInequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807

Atmanspacher, H. (2004): Quantum Approaches to Consciousness, in TheStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2004 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta(http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/qt-consciousness/)

Atmanspacher, H. & Ruhnau, E. (eds) (1997): Time, Temporality, Now. Ex-periencing Time and Concepts of Time in an Interdisciplinary Perspective(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg)

Audi, R. (1998): Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theoryof Knowledge (Routledge, London)

Baars, B. (1988): A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness (Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge)

Bacciagaluppi, G. (2005): The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechan-ics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2004 edn, ed.by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2005/entries/qm-decoherence/)

Bedard, K. (1999): Material Objects in Bohm’s Interpretation, Philos. Sci.66(2), 221–242

Bekenstein, J. D. (2003): Information in the Holographic Universe, ScientificAmerican, August 2003

Bell, J. S. (1987): Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Col-lected Papers on Quantum Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge)

Beller, M. (1999): Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution (Univer-sity of Chicago Press, Chicago)

Bergstrom, M. (1969): An Entropy Model of the Developing Brain, Devel.Psych., 2(3), 139–152

250 Bibliography

Bieri, P (1995): Why is Consciousness Puzzling?, in Conscious Experience,ed. by T. Metzinger (Imprint Academic, Schoningh), pp. 45–60

Block, N. (1978): Troubles with Functionalism, in Minnesota Studies in Phi-losophy of Science, vol. IX, ed. by C. V. Savage (University of MinnesotaPress, Minneapolis)

Block, N. (1980): Introduction: What Is Functionalism?, in Readings in Phi-losophy of Psychology vol. 1, ed. by N. Block (Harvard University Press,Cambridge MA)

Block, N. (1990): Can the Mind Change the World?, in Meaning and Method:Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, ed. by G. Boolos (Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge)

Block, N., Flanagan, O. J., Guzeldere, G. (1997): The Nature of Conscious-ness: Philosophical Debates (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)

Bogen, J. B. (1995): Relations, Internal and External, in The Oxford Compan-ion to Philosophy, ed. by T. Honderich (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Bohm, D. (1951): Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, New York) [also Dover,New York, 1989]

Bohm, D. (1952): A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory inTerms of Hidden Variables I & II, Phys. Rev. 85, 166–189

Bohm, D. (1957): Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (Routledge, Lon-don) [2nd edn with new preface, 1984]

Bohm, D. (1965a): The Special Theory of Relativity (Routledge, London)Bohm, D. (1965b): Problems in the Basic Concepts of Physics, in Satyen-

dranath Bose 70th Birthday Commemoration Volume, part II (Prof. S. N.Bose 70th Birthday Celebration Committee, Calcutta) [an inaugural lecturedelivered at Birkbeck College, University of London, 13 February 1963, withtwo appendices]

Bohm, D. (1965c): Space, Time, and the Quantum Theory Understood inTerms of Discrete Structural Process, in Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Elementary Particles 1965, Kyoto, pp. 252–287

Bohm, D. (1965d): A Proposed Topological Formulation of the Quantum The-ory, in The Scientist Speculates, ed. by I. J. Good (Putnam, New York)

Bohm, D. (1969a): Some Remarks on the Notion of Order, in Towards aTheoretical Biology, 2. Sketches, ed. by C. H. Waddington (Aldine, Chicago)

Bohm, D. (1969b): Further Remarks on Order, in Towards a Theoretical Bi-ology, 2. Sketches, ed. by C. H. Waddington (Aldine, Chicago)

Bohm, D. (1970): Fragmentation in Science and in Society, Impact Sci. Soc.,XX(2), 159–169

Bohm, D. (1971): Space-Time Geometry as an Abstraction from “Spinor”Ordering, in Perspectives in Quantum Theory: Essays in Honor of AlfredLande, ed. by W. Yougrau & A. van der Merwe (MIT Press, CambridgeMA)

Bohm, D. (1973): Human Nature as the Product of our Mental Models, inThe Limits of Human Nature, ed. by J. Benthall (Allen Lane, London)

Bibliography 251

Bohm, D. (1974) On the Subjectivity and Objectivity of Knowledge, in BeyondChance and Necessity: A Critical Inquiry into Professor Jacques Monod’sChance and Necessity, ed. by John Lewis (Humanities Press, Atlantic High-lands NJ)

Bohm, D. (1976): Fragmentation and Wholeness (The Van Leer JerusalemFoundation, Jerusalem) [republished in Nichol (2002)]

Bohm, D. (1977): Science as Perception-Communication, in The Structure ofScientific Theories, ed. by F. Suppe (University of Illinois Press, Chicago)

Bohm, D. (1979): David Joseph Bohm – Interview, in A Question of Physics:Conversations in Physics and Biology, ed. by P. Buckley & F. D. Peat(Routledge, London)

Bohm, D. (1980): Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Routledge, London)Bohm, D. (1982): Response to Schindler’s Critique of My Wholeness and the

Implicate Order, Int. Philos. Q. 22(4), 329–339Bohm, D. (1985): Unfolding Meaning: A Weekend of Dialogue with David

Bohm, ed. by D. Factor (Foundation House Publications, Mickleton, UK)[republished by Routledge, London, 1987]

Bohm, D. (1986): Time, the Implicate Order, and Pre-space, in Physics andthe Ultimate Significance of Time: Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philoso-phy, ed. by D. Griffin (State University of New York Press, Albany NY)

Bohm, D. (1987a): Hidden Variables and the Implicate Order, in QuantumImplications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm, ed. by B. J Hiley and F. D.Peat (Routledge, London)

Bohm, D. (1987b): Discussions, in Symposium on the Foundations of ModernPhysics 1987, Joensuu, Finland

Bohm, D. (1987c): The Implicate Order and Prigogine’s Notions of Irre-versibility, Found. Phys. 17(7), 667–677

Bohm, D. (1988): Postmodern Science and a Postmodern World, in The Reen-chantment of Science, ed. by D. R. Griffin (State University of New YorkPress, Albany NY)

Bohm, D. (1989): Meaning and Information, in The Search for Meaning, ed. byP. Pylkkanen (Crucible, Wellingborough, UK; distributed by HarperCollins,London)

Bohm, D. (1990): A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter,Philos. Psych. 3(2), 271–286

Bohm, D. (1995): On Dialogue (Routledge, London)Bohm, D. & Biederman, C. (1999): The Bohm–Biederman Correspondence.

Volume 1: Creativity and Science, ed. by P. Pylkkanen (Routledge, London)Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. (1984): Generalization of the Twistor to Clifford

Algebras as a Basis for Geometry, Revista Brasileira de Fisica, VolumeEspecial Os 70 anos de Mario Schonberg, pp. 1–26

Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. (1985): Active Interpretation of the Lorentz “Boosts”as a Physical Explanation of Different Time Rates, Am. J. Phys. 53(8),pp. 720–723

252 Bibliography

Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. (1987): An Ontological Basis for Quantum Theory:I. Non-relativistic Particle Systems, Phys. Rep. 144(6), 323–348

Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. (1993): The Undivided Universe: An OntologicalInterpretation of the Quantum Theory (Routledge, London)

Bohm, D., Hiley, B. J. & Kaloyeroy, P. N. (1987): An Ontological Basis forthe Quantum Theory II, Phys. Rep. 144(32), 349

Bohm, D. & Peat, F. D. (2000): Science, Order, and Creativity 2nd edn (Rout-ledge, London)

Bohm, D. & Pylkkanen, P. (1991): Cognition as a Movement toward Coher-ence (unpublished manuscript)

Broad, C. D. (1923): Scientific Thought (Kegan Paul, London)Broad, C. D. (1925): The Mind and Its Place in Nature (Routledge and Kegan

Paul, London)Brown, H. R. & Harre, R. (eds) (1988): Philosophical Foundations of Quantum

Field Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford)Bunge, M. (1979): Causality and Modern Science, 3rd revised edn (Dover,

New York)Callender, C. & Huggett, N. (eds) (2001): Physics Meets Philosophy at the

Planck Scale (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Carruthers, P. (2001): Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness, in The

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2001 edn, ed. by E. N.Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2001/entries/consciousness-higher)

Cartwright, N. (1983): How the Laws of Physics Lie (Clarendon Press, Ox-ford)

Chalmers, D. (1995): Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness, J. Consc.Stud. 2, 200–219

Chalmers, D. J. (1996): The Conscious Mind: In Search of a FundamentalTheory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Chalmers, D. J. (1997): Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness, J.Consc. Stud. 4(1), 3–46

Chalmers, D. (2002a): Does Conceivability Entail Possibility, in Conceivabilityand Possibility, ed. by T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Oxford University Press,Oxford), pp. 145–200

Chalmers, D, (2002b): Consciousness and Its Place in Nature, in Philosophy ofMind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. by D. Chalmers (OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford) [also in Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy ofMind, ed. by S. Stich & F. Warfield (Blackwell, Oxford, 2003)]

Chrisley, R. C. (1997): Learning in Non-superpositional Quantum Neurocom-puters, in Brain, Mind and Physics, ed. by P. Pylkkanen, P. Pylkko &A. Hautamaki (IOS Press, Amsterdam), pp. 126–139

Churchland, P. M. (1984): Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary In-troduction to the Philosophy of Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)

Churchland, P. M. (1989): A Neurocomputational Perspective. The Nature ofMind and Structure of Science (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)

Bibliography 253

Churchland, P. M. (2004): Functionalism at Forty: A Critical Retrospective,J. Philos. CII(1), 33–50

Churchland, P. S. (1986): Neurophilosophy (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)Comfort, A. (1981): The Implications of an Implicate, J. Social Biol. Struct.

4, 363–374Cottingham, J. (1986): Descartes (Blackwell, Oxford)Crane, T. (1992): Mental Causation and Mental Reality, Proc. Aristotelian

Soc. XCII(2), 185–202Crick, F. H. (1994): The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the

Soul (Scribner, New York NY)Cushing, J. T. (1994): Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the

Copenhagen Hegemony (University of Chicago Press, Chicago)Cushing, J. T., Fine, A. & Goldstein, S. (eds) (1996): Bohmian Mechanics

and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Boston Studies in the Philosophy ofScience vol. 184 (Kluwer, Boston)

Dainton, B. (2000): Stream of Consciousness. Unity and Continuity in Con-scious Experience (Routledge, London)

Dainton, B. (2001): Time and Space (Acumen, Chesham)Dainton, B. (2004): Unity in the Void: Reply to Revonsuo, Psyche 10(1)

(http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/symposia/dainton/rev-r.pdf)Davidson, D. (1970): Mental Events, in Experience and Theory, ed. by L. Fos-

ter & J. W. Swanson (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst MA),pp. 79–101

Davidson, D. (2001): Essays on Actions and Events 2nd edn (Clarendon Press,Oxford)

Dehmelt, H. (1990): Am. J. Phys. 58 17–27Dennett, D. C. (1991): Consciousness Explained (Little, Brown, Boston MA)Dennett, D. C. (1999): The Zombie Hunch: Extinction of an Intuition?, final

draft for the Royal Institute of Philosophy Millennial Lecture, 28 Novem-ber 1999 (http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/courses/consciousness/papers/DD-zombie.html)

Dretske, F. (1981): Knowledge and the Flow of Information (MIT Press, Cam-bridge MA)

Earman, J., Glymour, C. & Mitchell, S. (eds) (2002): Ceteris Paribus Laws(Kluwer, Dordrecht)

Faye, J. (1999) Explanation Explained, Synthese 120, 61–75Faye, J. (2002): Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, in The

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2002 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta(http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/qm-copenhagen/)

Feyerabend, P. K. (1960): Professor Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature, Brit. J.Philos. Sci. X(40), 321–338

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. (1965): The Feynman Lectureson Physics. Vol. 3: Quantum Mechanics (Addison Wesley, Reading MA)

Fodor, J. (1990): A Theory of Content (MIT Press, Boston MA)Folse, H. (1985): The Philosophy of Niels Bohr (North-Holland, Amsterdam)

254 Bibliography

Forman, P. (1987): Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Basisfor Physical Research in the United States, 1940–60, Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol.Sci. 18, 149–229

Freire, O., Jr. (2005): Science and Exile: David Bohm, the Hot Times of theCold War, and His Struggle for a New Interpretation of Quantum Mechan-ics, Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. Sci. 36(1), 1–34

Frescura, F. A. M. & Hiley, B. J. (1980): The Implicate Order, Algebras, andthe Spinor, Found. Phys. 10(1), 7–31

Ghirardi, G. (2002): Collapse Theories, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Phi-losophy, Spring 2002 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2002/entries/qm-collapse/)

Gierer, A. (2002): Holistic Biology Back on stage? Comments on Post-genomics in Historical Perspective, Philos. Nat. 39(1), 25–44

Gill, M. L. (2005): Aristotle’s Metaphysics Reconsidered, J. Hist. Philos.43(3), 223–251

Globus, G. (1987): Dream Life, Wake Life (State University of New YorkPress, Albany NY)

Globus, G. (2003): Quantum Closures and Disclosures (John Benjamins, Am-sterdam)

Globus, G., Pribram K. H. & Vitiello, G. (eds) (2004): Brain and Being.At the Boundary between Science, Philosophy, Language, and Arts (JohnBenjamins, Amsterdam)

Goldstein, S. (2002): Bohmian Mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy Philosophy, Winter 2002 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/qm-bohm/)

Grush, R. & Churchland, P. S. (1995): Gaps in Penrose’s Toilings, J. Consc.Stud., 2(1), 10–29

Guarini, M. (2003): Bohm’s Metaphors, Causality, and the Quantum Poten-tial, Erkenntnis 59, 77–95

Guzeldere, G. (1997): Introduction: The Many Faces of Consciousness: AField Guide in The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, ed.by N. Block, O. J. Flanagan, & G. Guzeldere (MIT Press, Cambridge MA),pp. 1–67

Hackermuller, L., Hornberger, K., Brezger, B., Zeilinger, A. & Arndt, M.(2004): Decoherence of Matter Waves by Thermal Emission of Radiation,Nature 427, 711–714

Hagan, S., Hameroff, S. R. & Tuszynzki, J. (2002): Quantum Computation inBrain Microtubules: Decoherence and Biological Feasibility, Phys. Rev. E65, 061901

Hameroff, S. R. & Penrose, R. (1996): Orchestrated Reduction of QuantumCoherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model for Consciousness?, in Toward aScience of Consciousness The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, ed. byS. R. Hameroff, A. W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)

Heidegger, M. (1962): Being and Time (Harper & Row, New York)

Bibliography 255

Heil, J. & Mele, A. (eds) (1995): Mental Causation (Oxford University Press,Oxford)

Hiley, B. J. (1980): Towards an Algebraic Description of Reality, Annales dela Fondation Louis de Broglie 5(2), 75–103

Hiley, B. J. (1991): Vacuum or Holomovement, in Philosophy of Vacuum, ed.by S. Saunders & H. Brown (Clarendon Press, Oxford)

Hiley, B. J. (2004): Information, Quantum Theory, and the Brain, in Brainand Being. At the Boundary between Science, Philosophy, Language, andArts, ed. by G. Globus, K. H. Pribram & G. Vitiello (John Benjamins,Amsterdam), pp. 197–214

Hiley, B. J. & Peat, F. D. (eds) (1987) Quantum Implications: Essays inHonour of David Bohm (Routledge, London)

Hiley, B. J. & Pylkkanen, P. (1996): Representation and Interpretation inQuantum Physics, in Alternative Representations, ed. by D. M. Peterson(Intellect Books, Exeter)

Hiley, B. J. & Pylkkanen, P. (1997) Active Information and Cognitive Science– A Reply to Kieseppa, in Brain, Mind and Physics, ed. by P. Pylkkanen,P. Pylkko & A. Hautamaki (IOS Press, Amsterdam), pp. 64–85

Hiley, B. J. & Pylkkanen, P. (2001): Naturalizing the Mind in a QuantumFramework, in Dimensions of Conscious Experience, ed. by P. Pylkkanen& T. Vaden (John Benjamins, Amsterdam)

Hiley, B. J. and Pylkkanen, P. (2005) Can Mind Affect Matter via Active Infor-mation, Mind and Matter 3(2), 7–27 (http://www.mindmatter.de/mmpdf/hileywww.pdf)

Holland, P. R. (1993): The Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge)

Honderich, T. (ed) (1995): The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford)

Honderich, T. (2004): On Consciousness (Edinburgh University Press, Edin-burgh)

Husserl, E. (1913): Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans-lated by W. B. Gibson, 1931 edn (MacMillan, New York)

Isaacs, W. (1999): Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together (Doubleday,New York)

Jantch, E. (1980): The Self-organizing Universe (Pergamon Press, Oxford)Juti, R. (2001): Johdatus Metafysikkaan [Introduction to Metaphysics] (Gau-

deamus, Helsinki) [in Finnish]Kaila, E. (1956): Terminalkausalitat als die Grundlage eines unitarischen

Naturbegriffs. Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung, Acta Philos. Fenn.10, 1–122

Kaila, E. (1979): Reality and Experience, ed. by R. S. Cohen (Reidel, Dor-drecht)

Kant, I. (1991): Critique of Pure Reason 2nd edn (Dent, London) [originallypublished in German in 1787]

256 Bibliography

Kauffman, S. A. (1993): The Origins of Order: Self-organization and Selectionin Evolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Kauffman, S. A. (2000): Investigations (Oxford University Press, Oxford)Kieseppa, I. A. (1997a) Is David Bohm’s Notion of Active Information Useful

in Cognitive Science?, in Brain, Mind and Physics, ed. by P. Pylkkanen,P. Pylkko & A. Hautamaki (IOS Press, Amsterdam), pp. 54–63

Kieseppa, I. A. (1997b) On the Difference between Quantum and ClassicalPotentials – A Reply to Hiley and Pylkkanen, in Brain, Mind and Physics,ed. by P. Pylkkanen, P. Pylkko & A. Hautamaki (IOS Press, Amsterdam),pp. 86–99

Kim, J. (1989): The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism, Amer. Philos. Assoc.Proc. 63(3), 31–47

Kim, J. (1990): Explanatory Exclusion and the Problem of Mental Causa-tion, in Information, Semantics, and Epistemology, ed. by E. Villanueva(Blackwell, Oxford)

Kim, J. & Sosa. E. (eds.) (1999): Metaphysics: An Anthology (Blackwell, Ox-ford)

Kohonen, T. (1984): Self-organization and Associative Memory (Springer,Berlin, Heidelberg)

Koskinen, H. (2004): From a Metaphilosophical Point of View. A Study ofW. V. Quine’s Naturalism, Acta Philos. Fennica LXXIV [The PhilosophicalSociety of Finland, Helsinki]

Krishnamurti, J. & Bohm, D. (1999): The Limits of Thought (Routledge,London)

Laurikainen, K. V. (1988): Beyond the Atom: The Philosophical Thought ofWolfgang Pauli (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg)

Le Poidevin, R. (2004): The Experience and Perception of Time, in TheStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter 2004 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta(http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/time-experience/)

Lehar, S. (2002) The World in Your Head. A Gestalt View of the Mechanismof Conscious Experience (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ)

Lockwood, M. (1989): Mind, Brain, and the Quantum (Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford)

Loux, M. J. (2002): Metaphysics, 2nd edn (Routledge, London)Lycan, W. (1987): Consciousness (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)Lycan, W. (2003): Philosophy of Mind, in Blackwell Companion to Philosophy,

ed. by N. Bunnin & E. Tsui-James (Blackwell, Oxford)Machamer, P., Darden, L. & Craver, C. (2000): Thinking about Mechanisms,

Philos. Sci. 67, 1–25Maldacena, J. (2005): The Illusion of Gravity, Scientific American, November

2005Marcer, P. & Mitchell, E. (2001): What is Consciousness? An Essay on the

Relativistic Quantum Holographic Model of the Brain/Mind, Working byPhase Conjugate Adaptive Resonance, in The Physical Nature of Con-

Bibliography 257

sciousness, Advances in Consciousness Research, ed. by P. Van Loocke(John Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 145–174

Maroney, O. J. E. (2002): Information and Entropy in Quantum Theory, PhDThesis, Department of Physics, Birkbeck College, University of London(http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0411172)

McCann, E. (1994): History: Philosophy of Mind in the Seventeenth and Eigh-teenth Centuries, in A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, ed. by S. Gut-tenplan (Blackwell, Oxford)

Miller, R. B. (1990): Supervenience Is a Two-Way Street, J. Philos 87, 695–701

Montero, B. (1999): The Body Problem, Nous 33(3), 183–200Murphy, T. S. (1998): Quantum Ontology, in Deleuze and Guattari – New

Mappings in Politics, Philosophy, and Culture, ed. by E. Kaufman & K. J.Heller (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis)

Murphy, M. J. & O’Neill, L. A. J. What Is Life?: The Next Fifty Years. Spec-ulations on the Future of Biology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)

Nagel, T. (1978): Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Nagel, T. (1995): Dualism, in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, ed. by

T. Honderich (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 206–7Nichol, L. (ed.) (2002): The Essential David Bohm (Routledge, London)Nicolic, H. (2005): Bohmian Particle Trajectories in Relativistic Fermionic

Quantum Field Theory, Found. Phys. Lett. 18(2), 363–380Niiniluoto, I. (1987): Varieties of Realism, in Symposium on the Foundations

of Modern Physics 1987, ed. by P. Lahti & P. Mittelstaedt (World Scientific,Singapore)

Niiniluoto, I. (2000): Critical Scientific Realism (Oxford University Press,Oxford)

Noordhof, P. (1995): Panpsychism, in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy,ed. by T. Honderich (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Norris, C. (2000): Quantum Theory and the Flight from Realism: PhilosophicalResponses to Quantum Mechanics (Routledge, London)

Olwell, R. (1999): Physical Isolation and Marginalization in Physics. DavidBohm’s Cold War Exile, Isis 90, 738–756

Pagels, H. R. (1982): The Cosmic Code: Quantum Physics as the Languageof Nature (Bantam, New York)

Passmore, J. (1966): A Hundred Years of Philosophy 2nd edn (Penguin, Lon-don)

Peat, F. D. (1996): Infinite Potential. The Life and Times of David Bohm(Addison Wesley, Boston MA)

Peat, F. D. & Briggs, J. (1986): Looking Glass Universe (Simon & Schuster,New York)

Penrose, R. (1989): The Emperor’s New Mind: Computers, Minds, and theLaws of Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Penrose, R. (1994): Shadows of the Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

258 Bibliography

Penrose, R. & Hameroff, S. R. (1995): What Gaps’? Reply to Grush andChurchland, J. Consc. Stud., 2(2), 99–112

Perus, M. (1995) Analogies of the Quantum and Neural Processing – Con-sequences for Cognitive Science, in New Directions in Cognitive Science,ed. by P. Pylkkanen & P. Pylkko (Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society,Helsinki), pp. 115–123

Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, P. & Roy, J. M. (eds) (1999) NaturalizingPhenomenology (Stanford University Press, Stanford CA)

Philippidis, C., Dewdney, C. & Hiley, B. J. (1979): Quantum Interference andthe Quantum Potential, Il Nuovo Cimento, 52 (1), 15–28

Pinch, T. J. (1977): What Does a Proof Do If It Does Not Prove. A Study ofthe Social Conditions and Metaphysical Divisions Leading to David Bohmand John von Neumann Failing to Communicate in Quantum Physics, inThe Social Production of Scientific Knowledge: Sociology of the Sciences,vol. I, ed. by E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart & R. Whitley (Reidel, Dordrecht)

Pines, D. (1987): The Collective Description of Particle Interactions: FromPlasmas to the Helium Liquids, in Quantum Implications: Essays in Honourof David Bohm, ed. by B. J. Hiley & D. J. Peat (Routledge, London)

Plotnitsky, A. (1994): Complementarity. Anti-epistemology after Bohr andDerrida (Duke University Press, Durham NC)

Plotnitsky, A. (2002): The Knowable and the Unknowable. Modern Science,Nonclassical Thought, and the Two Cultures (University of Michigan Press,Ann Arbor MN)

Pribram, K. H. (1977): Languages of the Brain: Experimental Paradoxes andPrinciples in Neuropsychology (Wadsworth, Monterey CA)

Pribram, K. H. (1987) The Implicate Brain, in Quantum Implications: Essaysin Honour of David Bohm, ed. by B. J. Hiley & D. J. Peat (Routledge,London)

Putnam, H. (1975): Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers,vol. 1, 2nd edn 1985 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)

Pylkkanen, P. (1985): Toward a Realist View of Information. Some ObjectivistConcepts of Information, Meaning, and Knowledge. Masters Thesis, Schoolof Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, UK

Pylkkanen, P. (1989a): Bohm, Plato, and the Dark Age of Cave Mechanics, inThe Search for Meaning, ed. by P. Pylkkanen (Crucible, Wellingborough;distributed by HarperCollins, London)

Pylkkanen, P. (ed.) (1989b) The Search for Meaning (Crucible, Wellingbor-ough; distributed by HarperCollins, London)

Pylkkanen, P. (1992): Mind, Matter, and Active Information: The Relevanceof David Bohm’s Interpretation of Quantum Theory to Cognitive Science,Reports from the Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki, No. 2(Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki)

Pylkkanen, P. (1993): Some Methodological Remarks on Dennett’s MultipleDrafts Theory of Consciousness, CTS Reports, 93-04 (Center for Theoreti-cal Study, Charles University, Prague)

Bibliography 259

Pylkkanen, P. (1995): Mental Causation and Quantum Ontology, in Mind andCognition: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Science and ArtificialIntelligence, Acta Philos. Fennica Fasc. LVIII (The Philosophical Societyof Finland, Helsinki)

Pylkkanen, P. (1996a): On Baking a Conscious Cake with Quantum Yeastand Flour, in Consciousness at a Crossroads of Cognitive Science and Phe-nomenology, ed. by J. Shawe-Taylor (Imprint Academic, Thorverton)

Pylkkanen, P. (1996b) Voidaanko kvantti-ilmiot ymmartaa prosessina? [Is ItPossible to Understand Quantum Phenomena as a Process?], in Tieto, to-tuus ja todellisuus [Knowledge, Truth, and Reality ], Prof. Ilkka Niiniluoto’sFestschrift (Gaudeamus, Helsinki) [in Finnish]

Pylkkanen, P. (1999a): The Philosophical Implications of Quantum Level Ac-tive Information, in Proceedings of CASYS ’98, The Second InternationalConfererence on Computing Anticipatory Systems, ed. by Daniel Dubois,American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 465 (Springer,Berlin, Heidelberg)

Pylkkanen, P. (1999b): “Introduction” and “chapter summaries” in TheBohm–Biederman Correspondence. Vol. 1: Creativity and Science ed. byP. Pylkkanen (Routledge, London)

Pylkkanen, P. (2000): The Problem of Consciousness: Natural and Artificial,in STep 2000 – Millenium of Artificial Intelligence (Finnish Artificial In-telligence Society, Helsinki)

Pylkkanen, P. (2004a): Keeping it all together. Review of Altered Egos: Howthe Brain Creates the Self by T. Feinberg (Oxford University Press, Oxford,2002), Contemp. Psych. APA Rev. Books 49(1), 99–101

Pylkkanen, P. (2004b): Can Quantum Analogies Help Us to Understand theProcess of Thought?, in Brain and Being. At the Boundary between Sci-ence, Philosophy, Language, and Arts, ed. by G. Globus, K. H. Pribram &G. Vitiello (John Benjamins, Amsterdam)

Pylkkanen, P. (2005): Reconceptualizing What We Know, Review of On Con-sciousness, by T. Honderich (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh), J.Consc. Stud. 12 (7), 93–95

Pylkkanen, P. (forthcoming): Does Dynamical Modeling Explain Time Con-sciousness?, in Computing, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science [working ti-tle], ed. by G. Dodig-Crnkovic, & S. Stuart (Cambridge Scholars Press,Cambridge)

Pylkkanen, P. & Pylkko P. (eds) (1995): New Directions in Cognitive Science(Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society, Helsinki)

Pylkkanen, P. & Vadn, T. (eds) (2001): Dimensions of Conscious Experience(John Benjamins, Amsterdam)

Pylkkanen, P., Pylkko P. & Hautamaki, A. (eds) (1997): Brain, Mind, andPhysics (IOS Press, Amsterdam)

Poppel, E. (1988): Mindworks: Time and Conscious Experience (Harcourt,Boston)

260 Bibliography

Quantum Universe Committee (2004): Quantum Universe. The Revolu-tion in 21st Century Particle Physics (DOE/NSF High Energy PhysicsPanel, Pittsburgh PA) (http://www.interactions.org/quantumuniverse/qu/about/download.html)

Quine, W. V. O. (1960): Word and Object (Harvard University Press, Cam-bridge MA)

Rescher, N. (1996): Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philos-ophy (State University of New York Press, Albany NY)

Revonsuo, A. (1995): Consciousness, Dreams, and Virtual Realities, Philos.Psych. 8, 35–58

Revonsuo, A. (2003) The Contents of Phenomenal Consciousness: One Re-lation to Rule Them All and in the Unity Bind Them [Commentaryon Stream of Consciousness. Unity and Continuity in Conscious Expe-rience by B. Dainton (Routledge, London) Psyche 9(08) (http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v9/psyche-9-08-revonsuo.html)

Revonsuo, A. (2005): Inner Presence: Consciousness as a Biological Phe-nomenon (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)

Robb, D. & Heil, J. (2005): Mental Causation The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy, Spring 2005 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/mental-causation/)

Rorty, R. (1979): Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton UniversityPress, Princeton NJ)

Ruhnau, E. (1995): Time-gestalt and the Observer, in Conscious Experience,ed. by T. Metzinger (Imprint Academic, Schoningh)

Sarfatti, J. (1997): How Thoughts Shape Matter (http://www.stardrive.org/bohm.html)

Saunders, S. (2002): Is the Zero-Point Energy Real?, in Ontological Aspects ofQuantum Field Theory, ed. by M. Kuhlmann, H. Lyre & A. Wayne (WorldScientific, Singapore)

Schaffer, J. (2003): Is There a Fundamental Level, Nous 37(3), 498–517Schiffer, S. (1991): Ceteris Paribus Laws, Mind 100(397) 1–17Schindler, D. L. (1982): David Bohm on Contemporary Physics and the Over-

coming of Fragmentation, Int. Philos. Q. 22Seager, W. (1991): The Metaphysics of Consciousness (Routledge, London)Searle, J. (1992): The Rediscovery of the Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)Senge, P. (1990): The Fifth Discipline (Doubleday, New York)Shanon, B. (1991): Cognitive Psychology and Modern Physics: Some Analo-

gies, Eur. J. Cog. Psych 3(2), 201–234Smith, Q. (2002) Why Cognitive Scientists Cannot Ignore Quantum Theory, in

Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, ed. by Q. Smith & A. Jolic(Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Steinhardt, P. J. & Turok, N. (2006): Why the Cosmological Constant is Smalland Positive, Science 4 May 2006: 11262311 (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1126231v1)

Bibliography 261

Stoljar, D. (2001): Physicalism, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,Spring 2001 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/physicalism/)

Stonier, T. (1990): Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe:An Exploration into Information Physics (Springer, London)

Strawson, P. F. (1966): The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant’s Critiqueof Pure Reason (Routledge, London)

Sundqvist, F. (2003): Perceptual Dynamics: Theoretical Foundations andPhilosophical Implications of Gestalt Psychology, Acta Philos. Gothoburgen-sia No. 16 (Department of Philosophy University of Gothenburg, Gothen-burg)

Vaidman, L. (2002): Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechan-ics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2002 edn, ed.by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/qm-manyworlds/)

Valentini, A. (2001): Pilot-Wave Theory: An Alternative Approach to ModernPhysics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)

van Gelder, T. (1997): The Dynamical Alternative, in The Future of the Cogni-tive Revolution, ed. by D. M. Johnson & C. E. Erneling (Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford), pp. 227–244

van Gelder, T. (1999): Wooden Iron? Husserlian Phenomenology Meets Cogni-tive Science, in Naturalizing Phenomenology, ed. by J. Petitot, F. J. Varela,P. Pachoud & Roy, J. M. (Stanford University Press, Stanford CA)

Van Gulick, R. (1995): What Would Count as Explaining Consciousness?, inConscious Experience, ed. by T. Metzinger (Imprint Academic, Schoningh)

Van Gulick, R. (2004): Consciousness, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philos-ophy Fall 2004 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/consciousness/)

Varela, F. J. (1999): The Specious Present: A Neurophenomenology of TimeConsciousness, in Naturalizing Phenomenology, ed. by J. Petitot, F. J.Varela, P. Pachoud & J. M. Roy (Stanford University Press, Stanford CA)

Vitiello, G. (2001): My Double Unveiled. The Dissipative Quantum Model ofBrain (John Benjamins, Amsterdam)

Weber, R. (ed.) (1986): Dialogues with Scientists and Sages (Routledge, Lon-don)

Weinstein, S. (2006): Quantum Gravity, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Phi-losophy, Spring 2006 edn, ed. by E. N. Zalta (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/quantum-gravity/)

Wittgenstein, L. (1974): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Routledge, London)

Index

abstractions 193, 201–202active information 35, 169–170

as a bridge between the mentaland the physical 36, 39, 184

as information for a system 35see also information and informa-

tion contentamplification of quantum effects in

the retina 36analogies, the importance of 55Aristotle 37–38, 49, 75, 87, 134artificial mind 142aspect monism 37, 39, 90

see also neutral monismatomism

as the architecture of reality 11,26–27

as not fitting with 20th centuryphysics 229

attention, movement of 231–232awareness 240

of change 208of endurance 208of movement 131

back-action in quantum theory 37,234–235

behaviorism 95, 98Biederman, C. 47–48big bang 82–83Blake, W. 19, 46

body, as a projection of a higher-dimensional ground 142–144

Bohm, D. 2, 12–13as a scientific realist 13–14, 18Bohr’s influence upon 13–14Einstein’s influence upon 13–15his attitude to metaphysics

152–155his contributions to mainstream

physics 13his view of Kant 129his description of his work 43–44his epistemic views 18his relation to objective idealism

234sociological studies of 13tension between realism and

antirealism in his view136–137

Bohr, N. 2, 13his interpretation of quantum

theory 13–14, 33, 173bosons 174Broad, C. D. 209–210, 222

Cartesian coordinates 50causality

in Bohm’s mind–matter theory195, 235

mechanistic view of 68teleological 64, 68

264 Index

causality contdunderstood as a certain order of

moments 150used to explain the relationship

between mind and matter194–195

Chalmers, D. 10, 113, 237, 239–244change 122, 125–126classical physics

limits of 4ink-in-fluid model of 72its relation to quantum physics

16, 172–173co-consciousness 212–213, 215,

217, 224cognitive neuroscience and the

implicate order 116–117cognition, as movement toward

coherence 154–155cognitive science, its mechanistic

view of human beings 22communication of order 50conceivability 56–58

and possibility 58conceptual comprehension 112configuration space 171conscious experience

as radically holistic 226involving flow in a particular

direction 208, 223its transitory aspects 130–133

consciousnessand quantum non-locality

142–144as analogous to a virtual reality

130, 159, 181as causal effect of neural processes

98, 194–195as difficult to reduce to matter

4–5deeper nature of 146–147explanation of 206–207, 214–215,

238–239hard problem of 6–7, 237–246higher-order theories of 245

its relation to matter 140–144neural theories of 5–6phenomenal structure of 9,

205–206puzzling aspects of 205stream of 27, 143, 207unconscious background of

146–147understood in terms of a series of

moments 125–127, 218–221consciousness studies 28, 109, 205cosmology 79–84creativity

as a fundamental feature of reality151–152

in evolution 152

Dainton, B. 206–218, 221–227de Broglie, L. 2de Witt, B. 2Dehmelt, H. 170Dennett, D. 7, 27, 182Descartes, R. 75, 93–94, 100–104,

158, 184, 201determinism 17

as a statistical average of chancefluctuations at a deeper level17

understood in terms of theimplicate order 150–151

developmental psychology 131Dewdney, C. 167dialogue, Bohm’s experiments with

45, 197–198differential calculus, its difficulties in

describing motion 119–120DNA molecule 35, 82, 85, 170, 184dreams

providing evidence for theconstructive nature of con-sciousness 130

Globus’ view of 130dualism 93–94dynamical approach to cognition, its

limits 120

Index 265

dynamical systems theory 37

Einstein, A. 13–15, 125his unified field theory 52

electronas a movement of incoming and

outgoing waves 14–15, 26,47, 179

ink-in-fluid model of 70–72possible inner structure of 170radar wave analogy of 33–34wave properties of 164

elementary particlesdifficulties with notion of 2–3,

55in Bohm’s scheme 177

eliminative materialism 97–99,202–203

emergence 7, 25–26of consciousness from matter 95,

141–142,emergent materialism 95, 98, 194endurance 26

of phenomenal contents 213,215–216, 223–225

enfoldment 19–23and living beings 84–88as a kind of existence 28, 121exemplified by holography 57exemplified by the ink-in-fluid

analogy 60–63in consciousness 104–117preservation of order in 111–112status of 74see also implicate order

Everett, H. 2evolution 151–152

role of creative projection in 152role of emergence in 194

explicate order 23–24, 46as a particular case of a more

general set of implicate orders69–70

as contained within the implicateorder 180

as the order present to the senses127

in conscious experience 24, 27,103

its origin understood in terms ofquantum field theory 171

fallibilism 155ffermions 174Feyerabend, P. 132first-person perspective 108–109form, activity of 183fragmentation 132freedom 126Freud, S. 146functionalism

in biology 87in philosophy of mind 7, 96, 100,

104fundamental length 48fundamental level, no need to assume

the existence of 17, 91, 149,191–192

Galileo, G. 21, 49Gibson, J. 130Globus, G.

his view of dreams 130on consciousness as a virtual

reality 130

Hanson, N. 132Heisenberg, W. 165Heraclitus 24, 37Hiley, B. 17, 25, 160, 167hologram 57–58holographic theory of neural memory

106–108holomovement 24–25

as a metaphysical concept 60as a movement in which a total

ordering prevails 231involving an immense “sea” of

energy 81–82law in 63–64, 66–68, 88–92

266 Index

holonomy 64, 68Husserl, E. 9, 109, 210

identifiability 63identity 63

between mind and matter 96immanent flow 213implicate order 15, 17–29, 57–60;

and computational models126–127

and consciousness 99–117and determinism 126, 151and living beings 84–88as co-presence of elements at

different degrees of enfoldment71, 111, 115, 219

as mode of being 65, 85–86basic idea of 19–20direct perception of 113illustrated by hologram 57–58in auditory experience 114,

217–225in conscious experience 27–28,

99–117in visual experience 114–116its relation to traditional notion of

substance 75mathematically described in terms

of algebra 66problems with 28–29, 158–159see also enfoldment

indeterminacy principle of quantumtheory 135, 165

indeterminism 17, 150infinity 79, 180information 19–22

double aspect theory of 241ubiquity of 243–244vehicle of 183see also active information,

information contentinformation content

as non-mechanistic 183as actually active 186as potentially active 186

see also active information,information

instrumentalism 97, 99intelligence 186–187

as collective 199interference 163ink-in-fluid analogy 60–76

limits of 158–159

Kaila, E. 125Kallio-Tamminen, T. 33Kant, I. 9, 205, 238

and the holographic theory ofneural memory 107–108

relation to Bohm 128–129Kim, J. 233Kripke, S. 239Krishnamurti, J. 199Kuhn, T. 132

Lappi, O. 193laws of physics 8

as causally closed 233, 239, 242as inherent in a context 67as relationships between enfolded

structures 75in the holomovement 88–92see also necessity

Leibniz, G. v. 19, 92, 134, 137, 144,236

his analogy of the mill 6–7, 10,237

lens 56–58levels

hierarchy of 29, 187–190,234–236

manifest and subtle 29–32,187–190, 195, 234–236

lifeas irreducible to inanimate matter

87–88mechanistic view of 182principle of 87–88

Lovelock, J. 198

macroscopic quantum effects 173

Index 267

Maxwell, J. 10, 49matter

as an aspect of the holomovement90

as a manifest level 30, 190understood in terms of a hierar-

chy of levels of information188–189

meaningas significance 29causal powers of 29–31see also information content

mechanistic ordercontrolling our attempts to be free

from it 55definition of 51difficult to give up 54

media, metaphysical function of139

memory 106–108, 110, 129, 131,209, 218

metaphysical significance of 137mental causation 8, 30–32, 35–38,

189–190, 232–236, 242–243metaphysics 93

as a study of being qua being153

social implications of 45the role of space in 79–80

Metzinger, T. 130mind

as a projection of a higher-dimensional ground 142–144

as a subtle level 30, 190its place in nature 11;

mind–body problem 93–99mind–brain identity theory 96,

98–99, 226moment

as basic element of reality134–138

as having a weak ontological status137

of consciousness 125–127parasitic quality of 139

motion, discontinuity of 50, 52–53,71

movementas fundamental 24–25, 60,

65–66, 229–232illusion of 115in a living being 232its mathematical description 66of a symphony 230

multi-level explanation 225–226multiple realizability 96music, experience of listening to 9,

28, 109–114, 206–225

Nagel, T. 99on panpsychism 141–142, 203,

232naturalism

holistic 238mechanistic 7, 27, 182, 238

necessityas inherent to a context 91–92illustrated by the ink-in-fluid

device 63–64, 67–68operating within a sub–totality

88–92neutral monism 37, 99

see also aspect monismNewton, I. 10, 21, 49non-conceptual comprehension

112–113non-locality 23, 34, 52–53, 76–79

as a non-causal connection78–79

illustrated by analogies 77–79in the ontological interpretation

169–170its possible role in the functioning

of the brain 235–236Noordhof, P. 203–204

ontological interpretation of quan-tum theory 15–17, 32–34,160–180

Fermi fields in 174–175, 177, 180

268 Index

ontological interpretation of quantumtheory contd

its explanation of the two-slitexperiment 162–169

its relation to other interpretations161–162

ontology 93order 47–50

as intrinsically implicate 69–70as active 113–114Bohm’s early ideas on 47–49in movement 58–59of a musical composition 49of separate points as fundamental

76pervasiveness of our notions of

54simple cases of 69

panprotopsychism 38, 190panpsychism 141–142, 190,

203–204participation 38, 190–191, 195,

198, 202and measurement at the quantum

level 195–196as a relationship between the

mental and the physical 196particle

difficulties with the notion of 25,52

and rapid recurrence of similarforms 71

Penrose, R. 187perception

analogous to electrons in a crystal80–81

as biased 132as involving construction 128–

130of a new order 50

phenomenal bonding 209, 212phenomenal contents

as actively transforming 221

as intrinsically conscious 212,216–217, 223

as possessing inherently dy-namic and directed character213–217, 223–225

phenomenal temporalitya Bohmian model of 217–225pulse theory of 209memory-based accounts of 209simple overlap theory of 211–214the awareness-overlap model of

209–210two-dimensional model of 210–

211, 218, 220Philippidis, C. 167philosophy of mind 99, 192,

195–196, 202, 238, 245as dismissive of Descartes 101its commitment to classical physics

28photon, in the ontological interpreta-

tion 160, 176physicalism 3, 102, 192, 237

difficulties in grounding it inphysics 54

physicsconceptual confusion in 2–3its influence upon theories of mind

8philosophical importance of 51

Piaget, J. 130–131Planck time 71, 166potentiality 24, 26, 44pre-space 159presentedness 210Pribram, K. 106, 129, 181process 230–231process philosophy 24, 37projection

as creative 151–152of a higher-dimensional reality

78–79, 81–82, 142–145, 148–152properties, intrinsic vs. observer-

relative 136–137Pylkko, P. 133

Index 269

Poppel, E. 216, 224

quantum field theory 20, 80as difficult to understand 175ontological interpretation of

174–180quantum fields, as being essentially

in movement 25quantum jump 50quantum potential

as containing information169–171

form-dependence of 35–36,166–167

mathematical expression of 166quantum theory

interpretation of 1–2, 14–15,161–162

its challenge to mechanistic order52–53

its relation to classical physics172–173

its relation to relativity 53–54

randomness understood as a certainorder of moments 150

realityas movement 121–122as multidimensional 81

reciprocal relationships 192–193recurrence 26reduction of mind to matter 4–5,

98, 191–193, 201–202, 226relations

external 23, 51, 195internal 22, 195

relative autonomy of sub-totalities79, 84

relativity 25, 52general theory of 125

Revonsuo, A. 130, 206–207,214–215, 225–227

Ruhnau, E. 216, 224Russell, B. 37, 118, 134, 138

Sarfatti, J. 37, 234

Searle, J. 98, 194–195self-organization 180

in the mind 186set theory, as logical reflection of

mechanistic order 66social holism 145soma-significance 29–32space

as an order of extension andseparation 100–101

as empty 80as full 80–84

space-time 203–204as a discrete structural process

48–49specious present 208, 210, 212,

216, 223Spinoza, B. 37, 94–95, 99, 134substance 93–94; activity of 183super-quantum potential 175–179

its non-linear features 176its non-local features 176its relevance to the mind–matter

relation 188–190superconductivity 171–172supervenience

and the holomovement 192of consciousness upon physical

processes 98, 195, 239–240

theories, as tools 157third-person perspective 108–109thing as real in its context 193thought

understood in terms of theimplicate order 123–127

its constructive role in experience128–130

its essentially collective nature198–199

time 147–152as a particular order 148–149as a projection of multidimen-

sional reality into a sequence ofmoments 150–151

270 Index

time contdrelativity of 147–148usual view of 119

time consciousness 205–227paradox of 9as understood in terms of the

implicate order 27–28,109–117, 217–225

token identity theory 96, 98, 100,104

totality 91–92, 193truth 153–155;

as part of what is 154–155twin paradox 149two-slit experiment 162–169type identity theory 96, 98, 100

Van Gulick, R. 6, 9, 205Velmans, M. 130Von Neumann, J. 2

wave–particle duality 23, 52–53and the ink-in-fluid model 73

explained by the ontologicalinterpretation 162–169

Wheeler, J. 241Whitehead, A. 24, 37

relation to Bohm’s views 137–138

wholenessat the quantum level 23, 181–182primacy of 11, 45–46of conscious experience 226

Wilkins, M. 198Wittgenstein, L. 55world view

as essential for harmony 44implications to specific studies

157–158social implications of 44–45,

197–198

Zeno’s paradox concerning motion117–123

zero-point energy 80