bicsi sp 2013 cabling standards peter meijer - monday 18 march 2013
TRANSCRIPT
BICSI 2013 Cabling StandardsBICSI 2013 Cabling Standards
Peter Meijer BE (Elec) M.Sc. RCDD
CT-001 Member
Chair CT1-02 Optical Fibre Testing
Gigabit Ethernet Adoption
Progressive Bytes
ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2
Generic cabling for customer premises
All too Much To Comprehend?
Standards Help You Take Control
Of Complex Situations4
ANSI/BICSI 001-2009
Information Transport Systems
Design Standard For K-12
Education Institutions
BICSI Standards
Reference Material
Education Institutions
5
ANSI/BICSI 002-2011
Data Center Design and
Implementation Best Practices
BICSI 004-2012
Information Technology Systems
Design and Implementation Best
Practice for Healthcare Institutions
and Facilities
BICSI Standards
Reference Material
and Facilities
6
NECA/BICSI 607-2011
Standard for Telecommunications
Bonding and Grounding Planning
and Installation Methods for
Commercial Buildings
• Mandatory for all Comms Cablers Data, Security, CCTV, Fire, BMS.
– Cabling in hazardous areas & explosive atmospheres
– Cables immersed in water within conduits
AS/CA S009 - Wiring Rules
Installation Requirements for Customer Cabling
– Separation from non-electrical hazardous services
– Hazards from lightning & power earth faults
– Cable “under slab” must pass water penetration test
• Mandatory for all Comms Cablers Data, Security, CCTV, Fire, BMS.
– Cable underground between buildings, twisted pair,
coax, have conditions applied. Fibre, WiFi are OK.
– OF safety & enclosure labeling
AS/CA S009 - Wiring Rules
Installation Requirements for Customer Cabling
– OF safety & enclosure labeling
• Label on front door & inside
• Symbol visible on panels
– Optical fibre cleaning & inspection
ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2
Generic cabling for customer premisesGeneric cabling for customer premises
• Amendment 1 for Channels published April 2008
• Amendment 2 for PL and Components approved Feb
2010
• Edition 2.2 consolidated, published Aug 2011 in Europe.
AS/NZS 3080 version Public Comment resolved. Waiting
on publication by SAI Global
• Contains Appendix ZA and ZB for ANZ requirements.
9
AS/NZS 3080 Ed 2.2 = ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2
Generic cabling for customer premises
• Balanced Permanent Links and CP Link definitions:-
PL1 = Backbone Permanent Link, 2 connectors
PL2 = Horizontal Permanent Link, 2 connectors
PL3 = Horizontal Permanent Link, 3 connectors
CP1 = Horizontal CP Link, 2 connectorsCP1 = Horizontal CP Link, 2 connectors
• PL2 and PL3 limits are already in field testers for
ISO Class EA , F and FA
10
AS/NZS 3080 Ed 2.2 = ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2
Generic cabling for customer premises
• OS2 Fibre – Atten. of 0.4dB @1310, 1383, 1550nm
• Has Reduced, Low or ‘Zero’ Water Peak
• Met by Type B1.3 fibre in IEC60793-2-50:2008 @1550
which is same as ITU-T G652d or c
• Also met by Type B6_a fibre IEC60793-2-50 @1625nm • Also met by Type B6_a fibre IEC60793-2-50 @1625nm
which is same as ITU-T G657a also known as
Reduced Bend Radius Fibre or Bend Insensitive Fibre
• If Splicing G657a to G652d, set up for ‘cladding’ alignment
Test in both directions. Expect some Gains.
11
AS/NZS 3080 Ed 2.2 = ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2
Generic cabling for customer premises
For ANZ,
• Optical Fibre propagation delay PD = cable sheath length
x 5 ns/m instead of needing to use an OTDR
• Optical Attenuation of connectors containing a splice
e.g. pre-polished stubs, are deemed to be a connector e.g. pre-polished stubs, are deemed to be a connector
and a splice for loss budget calculations
• ORL of two components in close proximity (e.g. MPO
cassette or a stub) shall be ≤ ORL of one connector
12
AS/NZS 3080 Ed 2.2 = ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 2.2
Generic cabling for customer premises
• ORL measurements may be a field test requirement for
OS1/OS2 APC e.g. NBN fibre
• For ANZ, AS/NZS 3080 Appendix ZA ORL testing for
installation conformance testing is optionalinstallation conformance testing is optional
13
Optional for
Conformance
in ANZ
ISO/IEC 11801 Ed 3
Future Edition - Possibly 2014 - 15 ?
Application AS/NZS
Present
ISO/IEC
Present
ISO/IEC
Future
Performance AS/NZS3080
ISO/IEC 11801 ISO/IEC 11801-1
Office Cabling AS/NZS3080
ISO/IEC 11801 ISO/IEC 11801-23080
Industrial Cabling AS/NZS-IEC/IEC24702
ISO/IEC 24702 ISO/IEC 11801-3
Residential Cabling AS/NZS-ISO/IEC15018
ISO/IEC 15018 ISO/IEC 11801-4
Data Center Cabling AS/NZS-ISO/IEC24764
ISO/IEC 24764 ISO/IEC 11801-5
• Published 27 September 2012
• The changes are Amendment 1 and the Appendix ZZ
for ANZ
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763.3 :2012
Optical Fibre Testing
15
• Encircled Flux – EF is a mode conditioning method to
ensure consistent modal distribution in MMF Launch
cords at the launch into the DUT
• EF defines the launch conditions of a light source.
It will improve Reproducibility when different testers
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763.3 :2012
Optical Fibre Testing
It will improve Reproducibility when different testers
are used to test the same MMF Link
• EF device is required on MMF Launch Cords for
measuring Attenuation with LSPM & OTDR
16
Measurement Uncertainty Depends on testers & test cords
• 1-Test Cord Ref Method has Uncertainty* = 0.1 dB MMF & SMF
• 3-Test Cord Ref Method has Uncertainty* ≤ 0.2 dB MMF
* Current uncertainty values ≤ 0.4 dB SMF
• Apparent Gains shall not exceed measurement uncertainty.
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763.3 :2012
Optical Fibre Testing
• Reasons for Apparent Gains:-
– Non-reference-grade test cords during testing
– Non-reference-grade adaptors during Reference Setting
– Increased light power after insufficient warm-up
– Dirty connectors during Reference Setting
– Disconnected launch test cord after Reference Setting
17
Negative Loss value found in test result
Gains are highlighted during testing on site.Don’t ignore tester warning. Fix the Reference
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763.3 :2012
Optical Fibre Testing
18
test result
≤ 0.75 dB
≤ 0.35 dB @ 850 nm
≤ 0.15 dB @ 1300 nm
≤ 0.30 dB
≤ 0.75 dB
≤ 0.35 dB @ 850 nm
≤ 0.15 dB @ 1300 nm
100 m 100 m
≤ 0.75 dB
≈ 0 dB
≤ 0.30 dB
≤ 0.75 dBAS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763-3 : 2012
≤ 0.20 dB ≤ 0.20 dB
EF Device
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763.3 :2012
Optical Fibre Testing
19
≤ 0.75 dB
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763-3
Loss budget @ 850 nm = 2.8 dB
Loss budget @ 1300 nm = 2.4 dB
ANSI/TIA-568-C
Loss budget @ 850 nm = 3.7 dB
Loss budget @ 1300 nm = 3.3 dB
≤ 0.75 dBAS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763-3 : 2012
Loss budget @ 850 nm = 2.6 dB
Loss budget @ 1300 nm = 2.2 dB
All Using 3-Test Cord Reference Method
New Loss Budget – Tighter
For 3-Test Cord Reference Method
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 14763.3 :2012
Optical Fibre Testing
20
1 The test interface connector allowance is now;
For MMF, 0.3 – 0.1 = 0.2 dB each end, = 0.4 dB total for test
For SMF, 0.5 – 0.2 = 0.3 dB each end, = 0.6 dB total for test
For ANZ, still a requirement to test with LSPM 2 x λ, 2 x dir
AS/NZS IEC 61935.1 + Amdt 1
Copper Testing, Appendix ZZ
• Available Now. Published September 2012
• The changes are Amendment 1 and the Appendix ZZ
for ANZ
AS/NZS IEC 61935.1 + Amdt 1
Copper Testing, Appendix ZZ
Alien Cross-Talk Testing Procedures
• If you are going to spend time doing AXT testing,
advice is given on selection of:-
– Disturbed runs– Disturbed runs
– Connectors
– Patch panels
22
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 29125 - Guidelines for remote
powering of data terminal equipment
• A clone adoption from ISO/IEC 29125 containing good
temperature rise info
• Must not exceed cable Temp Rating, usually 60 oC
• For a bundle of 100 cables with all pairs energised,
max current for a 14 oC rise is:-max current for a 14
oC rise is:-
Cat C5 C6 C6A C7 C7A
mA 710 778 836 836 873
UPOE – Universal PoE up to 60 Watts, is Cisco specific,
not an IEEE PoE or PoE plus standard
23
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 24764 AS/NZS ISO/IEC 24764
Generic cabling systems for data centresGeneric cabling systems for data centres
• This is clone of ISO/IEC 24764:2010 but as an AS/NZS
24764:2012 its less expensive to buy
24
Extra Distributor can
be added here
ISO/IEC 24764 Amd. 1 – additional distributor
Extra Distributor
Location
Building, Floor, Room
ISO/IEC 24764 - Amd. 1
Combination of 2 Permanent Links
Channel shall not
exceed 100m
ISO/IEC 14763-2
– Planning & Installation
• Published by ISO Feb 2012. Future AS/NZS, good info like;
• Cable pathways are defined as FULL during design when cables
occupy 50% of pathway
• Cable pathway Spare Capacity should be 25 - 30%• Cable pathway Spare Capacity should be 25 - 30%
• Max stacking height of cables in a 100mm bar spacing mesh tray
is 140mm, but … stay 10 mm below tray sides
• Shielded cable Min Bend Radius 60mm for pulling, 40mm for
hand placement
27
ISO/IEC 14763-2 – Planning & Installation
29
AIM – First Objective
CPID - Chips on patch cable programmed with physical characteristics during manufacture including End A and End B
information
Information about patch cable detected and passed to Path Manger software via CPU in panel
Automated Infrastructure Management
CopperFiber
Ethernet LAN
CopperFiber
Ethernet LAN
LEDs for Guidance
ICM Software
31
ISO/IEC to ANSI/TIA Cross-Reference Guide
Standard ISO/IEC 2013 ISO/IEC Future ANSI/TIA
Performance / Generic Cabling ISO/IEC 11801 ed. 2.2 (A1 & A2) ISO/IEC 11801-1 Ed 3 TIA 568C.0-2; 568C.3x
Office Cabling ISO/IEC 11801 ed. 2.2 (A1 & A2) ISO/IEC 11801-2 TIA 568C.1-0. -1 and -2
Industrial Cabling ISO/IEC 24702 ISO/IEC 11801-3 TIA 1005A
Residential Cabling ISO/IEC 15018 ISO/IEC 11801-4 TIA 570C
Data Centre Cabling ISO/IEC 24764 ISO/IEC 11801-5 TIA 942A
Building Automation ISO/IEC 11801 ed. 2.2 & ISO/IEC
16484
Unchanged TIA 862A
16484
Testing – Copper Cabling IEC 61935-1 Unchanged N/A
Testing – Optical Fibre Cabling ISO/IEC 14763-3 Unchanged TIA 526-7 (SM)
TIA 526-14 (MM)
Administration ISO/IEC 14763-1 Unchanged TIA 606B
Installation, pathways & spaces ISO/IEC 14763-2 & ISO/IEC 18010 Unchanged TIA 569C
Grounding/Bonding IEC 60364-1 Unchanged TIA J-STD 607A
MICE Tutorial / Technical Report TR 29106 Unchanged TSB-185
WLAN TR 27704 Unchanged TSB-162
PoE TR 29125 Unchanged TSB 184
Short Reach Specification
• 40GBASE-SR4 based on 850nm VSCEL
• 4 lanes x 10Gbps
• Bi-Directional: 4 fibers for transmit plus 4 fibers for receive
40 Gb/s Over Multimode Fibre40 Gb/s Over Multimode Fibre
10GB/s lane
10GB/s lane
Not used
01
120
1
12• OM3 / OM4
– Up to 100m / 150 m
– Max. channel IL of 1.9 dB / 1,5 dB
– Connector and splice loss
allocation of 1.5 dB / 1.0 dB
Short Reach Specification
• 100GBASE-SR4 based on 850nm VSCEL
• 10 lanes x 10Gbps
• Bi-Directional: 10 fibers for transmit plus 10 fibers for receive
100 Gb/s Over Multimode Fibre100 Gb/s Over Multimode Fibre
10GB/s lane
10GB/s lane
Not used
• OM3 / OM4
– Up to 100m / 150 m
– Max. channel IL of 1.9 dB / 1,5 dB
– Connector and splice loss
allocation of 1.5 dB / 1.0 dB
01
240
1
24
40 Gb/s Over <100m on Balanced Cabling
– ISO 11801-99-X - TR Technical Report
40 Gb/s Over <100m on Balanced Cabling
– ISO and TIA Approaches
• ISO target is 30m, 2 connectors, 2m patch cords all with
improved components (yet to be defined)
Class I with extended and improved Cat 6A components
Class II with extended and improved Cat 7A components
Upper frequency 1.6 GHz (2GHz ffs)
• TIA target is 30m, 2 connectors, 2m patch cords all with
Cat 8, based on Cat 6A
TIA-568-C.2.1 and IEEE 802.3 standards in development due mid 2015
36
40 Gb/s Over <100m on Balanced Cabling
– ISO and TIA Approaches
• Result: Less cancellation needed for Class II
• Paper concludes Class II C7A Shielded will support
40Gb/s over 50m
Ref Presentation at IEEE 802.3 Interim, Jan 2013, Phoenix, AZ
40 Gb/s Over <100m on Balanced Cabling
– TIA ‘CAT 8’
Cat 8 Proposal is an extension of Cat 6A
Ref: Nexans, LANline 2/2013
IEEE Directions
100GBE on Fibre
100GBE on 4 lanes of 25G in parallel Optical Fibres
IEEE 802.3bj formed in 2011 – 70 participants
• Full duplex operation only
• IEEE 802.3 Ethernet frame format
• BER at least 10^-12• BER at least 10^-12
• 4-lane 100G over OMx up to y m MMF on 850 nm VCSELs
Could be that x = 4, y = 100
4-lane 40G on OS2 to 40 km SMF - Channel IL <18 dB, WDM 1264.5 – 1337.5 nm
But these are subject to much debate around technology break points (cost, density,
power)
Future 400GBE on SMF ????
39
IEEE Directions
100GBE on Fibre
• 100GBE (4 x 25G) on MMF, length judgements using VCSEL with
spectral width similar to that used for 10GBASE-T are:-
OM3 30 – 40m Target 100m 1.9 dB Ch 1.5 dB
OM4 80 – 120m Target 150m 1.5 dB Ch 1.0 dB
Connecting Hardware
Some say:-
• EoR switching gives lower latency, higher performance, reduced
downtime
• SMF is preferred over MMF in data centres
40
Connecting Hardware
Allocation
MPO Polarity
Method BMethod A
Method C
41
NO !! To Copper Coated Aluminium Cables
The Standards & ACMA say ....
Copper Coated Aluminium or Steel Cables
Are not defined in ISO/IEC 11801� Fire hazard for any future PoE
� All IDC terminations will corrode
Thank You
Any More Questions?
43