bigger - mcgill university

32
Why do we need bigger and bigger accelerators To See Smaller and Smaller Structure? 32

Upload: others

Post on 27-Oct-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: bigger - McGill University

Why do we need bigger and biggeraccelerators

To See Smaller and Smaller Structure?

32

Page 2: bigger - McGill University

Ordinary matter is made out of littler bits

=⇒

=⇒

31

Page 3: bigger - McGill University

Those are made of littler bits

=⇒

These blobs are atoms. But even they have substructure:

30

Page 4: bigger - McGill University

What are those made out of?

Does it go on forever like that?

These are the central questions of particle physics.

What are the littlest bits?

How do they “work” and what are the rules describing

them?

With these rules you can figure out how all the bigger things

work step by step and size by size At least in principle

29

Page 5: bigger - McGill University

Compound objects and Smallest bits

Light = photons

electricity = electrons

atoms → electrons + nucleus

nucleus → neutrons, protons

neutron,proton → quarks, gluons

So far we think those in red are “elementary”

28

Page 6: bigger - McGill University

Experiments to see smaller

Cyclotron

27

Page 7: bigger - McGill University

Experiments to see smaller

a better cyclotron

26

Page 8: bigger - McGill University

Experiments to see smaller

Bevatron–even better resolution, inside nucleus

25

Page 9: bigger - McGill University

Experiments to see smaller

AGS (14 times bevatron) and RHIC (500 times)

24

Page 10: bigger - McGill University

Experiments to see smaller

Tevatron: best so far (2000 times bevatron)

23

Page 11: bigger - McGill University

Experiments to see smaller

The LHC: the next big step (14 000 times bevatron)

22

Page 12: bigger - McGill University

If we want to see smaller and smaller

WHY ARE THE EXPERIMENTS

GETTING BIGGER AND BIGGER?

21

Page 13: bigger - McGill University

Property of smallest bits:

They “wiggle”

1 photon is not

It is ����������������������������������������������

20

Page 14: bigger - McGill University

Deep property

The harder a particle is flying (“moremomentum”)the tighter the wiggles.

=⇒ is ����������������������������������������������

−→ is � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

19

Page 15: bigger - McGill University

How do I tell if it’s going right or left?

The wiggling is really corkscrew (in some sense)

=⇒ is ����������������������������������������������

⇐= is ����������������������������������������������

18

Page 16: bigger - McGill University

How can we tell things are “wiggling”?

Experimental fact.

17

Page 17: bigger - McGill University

Add two particles: add their momenta.

(How hard two things hit is how hard first hits plus how hard second hits.)

y

y

��

HH

��

HH

stuck together: yy

���

HHH

Wiggles add too:

��������������������������

plus��������������

������������

becomes ������������������������������������������������������

16

Page 18: bigger - McGill University

Example: light

The wavelength of light is from 400 nm to 700 nm (0.4 to

0.7 microns).

A human hair is about 50 microns across.

About 100 wavelengths of light fit across width of 1 hair.

Your eye can see features smaller than 50 microns, but not

1 micron.

Good microscopes can see down to about 0.5 micron.

15

Page 19: bigger - McGill University

How microscopes work (roughly)

Light either bends or gets absorbed off irregularities.

Roughly, angle = (wave length) / (size of irregularity).

Information about bent and surviving light tells about

objects.

14

Page 20: bigger - McGill University

Why can microscopes only see to 0.5 micron?

Light doesn’t resolve things smaller than 1 wiggle:

Same as

13

Page 21: bigger - McGill University

Need tighter wiggles to see smaller!

Forget about light (visible photons).

Go with X-rays.

10,000 times harder hitting, see 10,000

times smaller.

Resolve atoms. (Ask Mark Sutton.)

12

Page 22: bigger - McGill University

A problem:

The smaller I want to see, the harder hitting the probe must

be.

Harder hitting–imparts more energy

Beyond some point:

Blows apart the thing you are looking at!

(X-ray destroys the atom it hits.) That’s why they give you cancer

11

Page 23: bigger - McGill University

A problem:

The smaller I want to see, the harder hitting the probe must

be.

Harder hitting–imparts more energy

Beyond some point:

Blows apart the thing you are looking at!

(X-ray destroys the atom it hits.) That’s why they give you cancer

Solution:

Realize that you don’t care.

10

Page 24: bigger - McGill University

Problem

How do you get one elementary particle to fly so hard?

Similar to problem of a slingshot:

9

Page 25: bigger - McGill University

How do I shoot something faster?

Either use thicker, stronger rubber OR

USE A BIGGER SLINGSHOT!

8

Page 26: bigger - McGill University

Physicists need bigger and bigger slingshots

7

Page 27: bigger - McGill University

The bits come flying out faster too

Which means you need a bigger detector to catch them.

Cleo detector (10 GeV)

6

Page 28: bigger - McGill University

Phenix detector (500 GeV)

5

Page 29: bigger - McGill University

CDF detector (2000 GeV)

4

Page 30: bigger - McGill University

ATLAS detector (14 000 GeV)

3

Page 31: bigger - McGill University

How small have we seen?

• Light:1

50a hair

cells

• X-rays:1

500 000a hair

atoms

• 200MeV e−:1

50 000 000 000a hair

nucleus, p, n

• 200GeV e−:1

50 000 000 000 000a hair

quark, gluon, W ,Z

2

Page 32: bigger - McGill University

What’s next?

LHC: will see 7× smaller than we have gotten so far.

We “know” there will be new things to see

May be the last step we need

Or we might need to go even smaller

(bigger)!

1