biological evaluation - south fowl lake snowmobile access...
TRANSCRIPT
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 1
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects
Federally
Threatened
Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Alt. 4 Alt. 5
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus
leucocephalus
Large, fishbearing lakes
and rivers with large
trees for nesting
Yes
However, the
proposed
landings are
not near
super
canopy
trees.
Yes
Nest active
in 2005
occurs on
the west side
of South
Fowl Lake.
This territory
has been
active for
decades
even with
the
possibility of
human use
on the
existing
trails.
SNF records
and 2005
survey
No Effect
The current east-west
leg of trail between
McFarland and So.
Fowl Lks. would not be
used.
Direct effects - none
expected.
Indirect effects - If in
fact use of the trail past
Royal Lk is stopped
the eagles now
occupying the territory
between Royal and So.
Fowl Lks. may benefit.
But, since the territory
has been active and
successful with the trail
as is, it would be
difficult to assume a
benefit. Most likely
snowmobile use on
this trail ceases before
nesting activity begins.
May affect but not
likely to adversely
affect.
Direct effects - none.
Trail would be
constructed between
nesting seasons.
Indirect effects - late
winter conditions may
afford snowmobile use
when eagles are
setting up territories
and affect nesting
behavior. This would
seem unlikely. Current
nest habitat is about a
half mile north of the
approach to So. Fowl
and disturbance is not
likely. Also, the
conditions for
snowmobile use in the
critical time have
usually deteriorated.
No Effect
The action would not
change any human
relationship with
eagle habitat. The
east end of the trail
is the same as
current, and is at
least a half mile from
any potential nest
site. Changes on
the west end would
not be in eagle
habitat.
No Effect
The action would not
change any human
relationship with
eagle habitat. The
east end of the trail
is the same as
current, and is at
least a half mile from
any potential nest
site. Changes on
the west end would
not be in eagle
habitat.
No Effect
The action would not
change any human
relationship with
eagle habitat. The
east end of the trail
is the same as
current, and is at
least a half mile from
any potential nest
site. The west end
is not in eagle
habitat.
Increasing human population seems emanate,
and settlement in the area is likely leading to
more potential for human wildlife contact with
negative effects. However, except for Alt 2, most
of the trails are proposed on existing rds and trls.
Crosscountry snowmobile travel is allowed on the
Superior NF. But, most snowmobile use occurs
on groomed and/or designated routes. The intent
of this proposal is to provided a route to travel
between two lakes. Except for the currently illegal
route into the BWCAW, there is no advantage to
traveling off the designated route. No matter
which alternative is chosen, these trails would
continue to channel snowmobile travel as it has
been for many years.
The condition of the fishery in South Fowl Lake
could be affected by overexploitation and/or from
pollution. This effect is difficult to judge; other
lakes in the surrounding NF can maintain heavy
visitation and successful eagle nesting. It seems
very unlikely the trails could foreseeably increase
human visitation to the decidedly increased levels
to actually alter the lake.
Determination of Effects
Biological Evaluation - South Fowl Lake Snowmobile Access Project
Determination of Effect by Alternative for Federally listed Threatened Species and Sensitive Species ¹ Occuring in the Project Area
Gunflint Ranger District, Superior National Forest
KEY:
¹ U.S. Forest Service - Region 9 Forester's (list of October 20, 2003)
Page 1 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 2
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Gray Wolf
Canis lupus
Large tracts of wild land
with adequate prey
(moose, deer, beaver),
a variety of habitats, low
human disturbance.
Deer do not winter in
the area. Moose may
number 2 to 3 per sq.
mi.
Yes
In Zone 1 of
Recovery
Plan. No
specific
population
goals.
Current
density of
OML 3, 4,
and 5 and
equivalent is
0.42
mi/sq.mi.
Yes
Historic
range; all of
northeast
Minnesota
Deer/moose
populations
MNDNR data
(Ingebrigtsen,
pers.comm)
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect.
The current east-west leg
of trail between
McFarland and So. Fowl
Lks. would not be used.
Direct effects - none
expected Indirect
effects - snowmobile use
on existing roads has
potential for human
chasing and/or shooting
of wolves. Chase
potential is very limited -
the snowmobiles are
more restricted to the
existing roads (CC 16 and
SFR 328) and wolves
could run off the roads.
Shooting is unlikely - it
would be rare for a
snowmobile rider to carry
a firearm. If in
fact the Royal Lk route is
not used, potential
wolf/human contact could
be reduced in about a 3
sq. mi. area. Moose and
wolves may move more
freely in this area. These
are only assumptions
since we have no
evidence of behavior
changes due to the
current use of
snowmobiles. No change
in the current 0.42
mi/sq.mi road density.
May affect but not
likely to adversely
affect.
Direct effects -
None. Late winter
would be the time for
denning. Mitigation
to construct trail from
August to mid winter
would likely avoid
direct effects during
the breeding season.
Poor exposure to
sun, relatively low
availability of prey
are reasons to
believe this trail
corridor would not be
favorable as denning
habitat.
Indirect effects -
as with Alt 1
shooting and
chasing are possible,
but very unlikely.
Road density would
not change (0.42
mi/sq. mi.).
May affect but not
likely to adversely
affect.
Direct effects - Late
winter would be the
time for denning.
Mitigation to
construct trail from
August to mid winter
would likely avoid
direct effects during
the breeding season.
Wolves probably do
not den in the
proposed new trail
route. The relatively
close proximity to
CC 16 reduces this
potential.
Indirect effects -
as with Alt 1
shooting and
chasing are possible,
but very unlikely.
Road density would
not change. Moose
and wolves could be
less stressed and
move more freely in
the Royal Lk
drainage.
May affect but not
likely to adversely
affect.
Direct effects -
none. The 0.4 mi. of
new trail
construction
between McFarland
Lk. and CC 16 is the
only part not on an
existing road. That
section is close to
human habitation
and activities and is
not likely denning or
rendezvous habitat.
Indirect effects - as
with Alt 1 shooting
and chasing are
possible, but very
unlikely. Road
density (0.42
mi./sq.mi.) would not
change. Moose and
wolves could be less
stressed and move
more freely in the
Royal Lk drainage.
May affect but not
likely to adversely
affect.
Direct effects -
none. Proposed trail
follows existing road
and trail.
Indirect effects - as
with Alt 1 shooting
and chasing are
possible, but very
unlikely. Road
density (0.42
mi./sq.mi.) would not
change. Moose and
wolves could be less
stressed and move
more freely in the
Royal Lk drainage.
Increasing human population and
housing in the area is likely to bring
more potential for human/wolf contact
with negative effects. However, except
for Alt 2, most of the trails are proposed
on existing rds/trs. Crosscountry travel
is allowed on the Superior NF with
snowmobiles. But, most snowmobile
use occurs on designated routes.
Except for the currently illegal route,
there is no advantage to traveling off the
designated route. Any of these trails
would continue to channel snowmobile
travel. Wolves are likely to den away
them. These trails would increase the
potential for ATVs. Wolves may avoid
these trails during daylight and use them
at night, but continue to use the area.
The Minnesota DNR has, is, and will
probably continue to schedule timber
sales on their property in the analysis
area. The temporary roads constructed
to access these sales would be off
SFR328 and possibly off of the Stump
River Road. These could provide more
corridors for snowmobile and ATV riders
to use. More likely use would be with
ATV’s by hunters, resulting in some risk
of wolf shooting. Some snowmobile
riders could consider these temporary
roads good to explore. These impacts
are not assured depending on if and
how the state managers close these
Page 2 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 3
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Canada lynx
Felis
canadensis
Variety of habitats,
particularly boreal, with
good hare populations.
The Forest Plan (2004)
guidance for lynx habitat
mgmt includes road and
trail direction to:
-Allow no net increase
in designated over-snow
trail routes unless
designation effectively
consolidates use and
improves lynx habitat
through a net reduction
of compacted snow
areas. -
Designate a snow
compacting trail to
move use away from
better lynx habitat, and
concentrate use within
existing areas.
-Seek ways to maintain
road and snow
compacting trail density
below 2 mi. per square
mile.
-Effective close trails
and low class roads that
intersect new snow-
compacting trails.
Yes
Project occurs
in Lynx
Analysis Unit
(LAU) 42.
Current 0.58
mi/sq.mi. road
and compact
snow trail. No
Critical habitat
has yet been
designated.
But, the SNF
is considered
important
habitat, and
follows the
Lynx
Conserva-tion
Assess-
ment and
Strategy
whereby
LAU's are
defacto critical
habitat.
(Forest Plan
BA, 2004)
No particular
records, but
the Superior
NF is
considered
important
habitat
(Forest Plan
BA,2004)
Lynx presence
has been
verified on the
SNF (MNDNR,
2004) The
SNF operates
under the
Forest Service
Lynx Conser-
vation
Agreement
with the Fish
and Wildlife
Service (2000)
to conserve
and manage
lynx and lynx
habitat (Forest
Plan BA,2004)
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect.
Assuming snowmobiling
Royal R. route between
McFarland and So. Fowl
L. would stop, there would
be 2.4 less miles of
road/snow-compacting
trail. Rd/tr density from
0.68 to 0.62 mi/sq mi. in
LAU. No trail loop
allowed between the
lakes.
Direct effects - none
Indirect effects -
snowmobile use on CC
16 and SFR 328 may lead
to human chasing and/or
shooting of lynxes.
Chasing unlikely;
snowmobiles are fairly
well restricted to the
existing roads, and lynxes
aren't. Shooting unlikely;
rare for a snowmobile
rider to carry a firearm.
General habitat and prey
would not be affected.
Use concentrated on
existing road corridors.
Assuring the Royal R.
route is not used, it would
help assure security for
lynx in an area with good
hare potential.
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect.
The new trail is 0.2 mi.
shorter than current link;
LAU rd/tr density would
not change. A loop could
be made on new and
existing rd/tr. between
McFarland and S. Fowl
Lks. as it does now.
Direct effects - the
proposed route could
intersect a den site, but
this route doesn' t
traverse habitat like that
used for denning
elsewhere on the SNF.
Also, mitigation measures
should prevent direct
destruction.
Indirect effects - Most of
the old route is in
potential hare hab. About
half the proposed tr.
would be likely hare hab.
Use of CC 16 and the
SFR 328 is likely to
continue for loop travel.
The effect would be
similar to current. Lynx
are approachable; but
shooting less likely than
chasing.
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect. New
construction (1.32 mi); the
remainder (4.1mi.) on
current corridors. The
new trail (west side CC16)
about the same length as
the illegal route. The rd/tr
density would remain 0.65
mi/sq.mi. Direct
effects - Mitigation
measures should prevent
the remote possibility of
interfering with a den.
Indirect effects - About
half the proposed
additional tr. in Alt 3
would be in likely hare
hab; about 1.9 ac loss.
But the current illegal
route in the Royal R.
drainage affects approx.
2.9 ac. of hare hab.
Removing disturbance in
the Royal R. drainage not
only provides more hab,
but it is a better area for
lynx being further from
human settlement. The
value of the hab. gained
by closing the original
route is more than that
lost in Alt 3.
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect. New
construction on about 0.4
mi.; the remainder on
current road coridors.
Without the old route the
rd/tr density would
decrease from 0.58 to
0..63 mi./sq.mi.
Direct effects - none.
Indirect effects -
snowmobile use on CC
16 and SFR 328 could
allow human chasing
and/or shooting of lynxes.
Chasing unlikely since the
snowmobiles fairly well
restricted to the existing
roads, and lynxes aren't.
Shooting unlikely because
snowmobile riders rarely
carry firearms. General
habitat and prey would
not be affected along
current roads. Assuring
the Royal R. route is not
used would help assure
security for lynx in an area
with good hare potential.
Almost total use of
existing coridors would
have least impact of all
alts.
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect. Rd/tr
density would decrease
from 0.58 to 0.54 mi.
sq.mi. No loop of
existing roads and trails
would be available
between the lakes.
Direct effects - none.
Indirect effects -
snowmobile use on SFR
328 could allow human
chasing and/or shooting
of lynxes. Chasing
unlikely since the
snowmobiles fairly well
restricted to the existing
roads, and lynxes aren't.
Shooting unlikely because
snowmobile riders rarely
carry firearms. General
habitat and prey would
not be affected along
current roads. Assuring
the Royal R. route is not
used would help assure
security for lynx in an area
with good hare potential.
Illegal use of CC 16 likely
to continue, but with
negligible effect to lynx.
29.2 total mi of existing rd/tr in this LAU.
Miles decrease in all alts, compacted snow
decrease - lynx benefit, ATV use may
increase- lynx probably not affected. Recent
research shows they are aware of rds/trs,
but seem not to avoid them or the vehicles
using them. Increasing human development
will likely increase negative human/wildlife
contact. But, except for Alt 2 and 3,
proposed routes mostly on existing rds and
trs. Crosscountry snowmobile travel allowed
on the SNF, but most snowmobilers use
designated routes. Except for the currently
illegal route, there is no advantage to
traveling off a designated route. Lynxes
likely to den away from these corridors.
Page 3 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 4
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Superior
National Forest
Sensitive
Species
MAMMALS
Heather vole
Phenacomys
intermedius
Forest, brushland or
clearcuts with
Vaccinium spp. and
rocks.
Presumably.
Some
localities in
the project
area are
somewhat
like other
place where
this species
is found. But,
the locations
for the
proposed
trails do not
appear to be
in favorable
habitat.
No
No searches
have been
made here.
Jannett 2002 No impact - route
follows existing
roads.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause
a trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Habitat of new
trail location does not
match that of known
sites. The species is
not likely to be here.
But if that is wrong, the
trail could be a loss of
habitat and may affect
a band of habitat of
varying width bordering
the trail.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause
a trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Habitat of new
trail location does not
match that of known
sites. The species is
not likely to be here.
But if that is wrong, the
trail could be a loss of
habitat and may affect
a band of habitat of
varying width bordering
the trail.
No impact - route
follows existing
roads.
No impact - route
follows existing
roads.
Page 4 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 5
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
BIRDS
Northern
goshawk
Accipiter gentilis
Large patch of older
trees with closed
canopy and open
understory
Yes
No nesting
records in
the area.
No
No searches
have been
made here.
MNDNR and
FS records
No impact - route
follows existing
roads.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of viability.
Habitat of new trail
location is mature forest,
well connected canopy,
minimal shrub layer. This
could be nesting hab.
Direct effects - None;
the trail construction
would be timed outside
nesting period.
Indirect effects - no
decline in prey expected.
Fragmentation of this
canopy is not likely to
widen because of the trail
corridor. The mitigation to
maintain trees and
provide only a narrow
corridor isn't likely to alter
the current canopy.
Snowmobile riders have
only slight possibility to
affect courting pairs in
early March.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause
a trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Direct
effects - None; the
trail construction would
be timed outside
nesting period.
Indirect effects - no
significant effects on
prey. Fragmentation of
this canopy is likely to
widen due to the
altered soil, water flow,
and light. That could
decrease its value for
goshawk. Over time
trees could mature at
trail edges, the canopy
could cover much of
the trail, and negative
effects could decrease.
Use by snowmobile
riders only slight
possibility to affect
courting pairs in early
March.
No impact - except
for a short segment
route follows existing
roads.
No impact - route
follows existing road.
In Alt 2 and 3 new trail segments are
made. Other trails like these are
possible in the analysis area. If
goshawks attempted nesting near one
of these trails, late spring and early
summer ATV use could stress the pair
and the young. We know of so few
nests and many times they fail. There
must be a significant landscape factor
such as mustelid predation that
discourages occupation of the habitat by
goshawks. These trail effects would
represent a limited form of forest
fragmentation. Since goshawks use the
forest interior, fragmentation may have
reduced goshawk habitat Forest-wide.
However, it appears available habitat is
going unused across the Forest. These
trail corridors would be relatively minor
in the overall landscape view.
Boreal owl
Aegolius
funereus
Secondary cavity
nester. Old boreal
forest (inc. aspen) next
to lowland conifer
foraging areas.
No
Not good
combination
of favorable
habitat
features.
No Lane; 18 years
of survey
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 5 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 6
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
LeConte's
sparrow
Ammodramus
leconteii
Uplands and lowlands
with dense, tall,
grass/sedge vegetation
and thick ground litter
No
Not good
combination
of favorable
habitat
features.
No Sauer et al.
2003; MN
NHP Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Black Tern
Chlidonias niger
Floating aquatic
vegetation mat around
lakes
No No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Olive-sided
flycatcher
Contopus
cooperi
Snags, low density
conifer lowlands,
riverine/riparian areas.
Yes
All of SNF is
in range;
conditions
are present
unknown Janssen 1995 No impact
Existing roads used
No impact
New trail may
traverse marginal
Olive-sided habitat.
No impact
Existing roads used
and new trail would
not be in Olive-sided
hab.
No impact
Existing roads used
and new trail may
pass near Olive-
sided hab. Effects
not anticipated
No impact
Existing roads used
Yellow rail
Coturnicops
noveboracensis
Lowland sedge
meadows with specific
characteristics such as
overhead mat of dead
sedge.
No
Not in range
No Janssen 1995
MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 6 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 7
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Black-throated
blue warbler
Dendroica
caerulescens
Large contiguous
mature forests, probably
associated with small
canopy gaps and a well-
developed shrub
understory
Yes Yes SNF records
and Janssen
1995
No impact
Existing roads used
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of viability.
Direct effects - the trail
construction is not
expected to directly affect
the species due to timing
mitigation. Indirect
effects - The proposed
trail is not likely to affect
enough of the mature
forest to affect BTBW use
here. The effects of
changing the water flow
down the hillside and
opening to sun would
open the corridor to more
than initial, narrow,
avenue. This could kill
trees and increase lower
forest structure. The
BTBW could benefit, but
there may be a trade-off
between overstory canopy
loss and the probable
gain in shrubs and small
trees. This bird seems to
favor canopy along with
lower stand structure.
Species is not expected
to be affected by trail
users.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause
a trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.through
habitat.
Direct effects - the
trail construction is not
expected to directly
affect the species
because of timing
mitigation.
Indirect effects -
mature forest with
relatively rich,
substrate would be
changed along the
trail. Changes in
water flow and sun
exposure would
effect the vegetation.
The initial corridor
width could open
more. This could
increase edge
effects and increase
shrubs. This may
provide structure for
these birds. Since
they favor some
forest canopy with
the understory
structure, the trail
may be a trade-off. If
No impact
Existing roads used;
only short distance
of new trail not in
ideal habitat.
No impact
Existing roads used
Bay-breasted
warbler
Dendroica
castanea
Mature upland and
lowland spruce/fir
forests.
Yes
less than
optimal
habitat in
project area.
unknown/
likely
Janssen 1995 No impact
Existing roads used
No impact
New trail would
create a corridor
through an area
unlikely to be used
by this species. It is
not expected to be
affected by trail
users.
No impact
New trail would
create a corridor
through habitat
unlikely to be used
by this species..
Species is not
expected to be
affected by trail
users.
No impact
New trail would
create a short
corridor through
marginal habitat.
Species is not
expected to be
affected by trail
users.
No impact
Existing roads used
Page 7 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 8
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Peregrine
falcon
Falco
peregrinus
Nest: cliff/ledges; Hunt:
forest openings, lakes,
wetlands
Yes
project would
not affect
habitat
No
The cliffs
above the
route for Alt
2 could offer
nesting
potential.
MN NHP
Database
2003 (lack of
records)
No impact - existing
roads used.
May impact individuals
but is not likely to
cause a trend toward
federal listing or a loss
of viability.
Direct Effects - None
expected with
construction occurring
after breeding season.
Indirect Effects -
Summer (human) use
of the trail could stress
adults if they were to
nest on the cliffs. If
rock climbers,
encouraged to use the
cliff because of this
trail, were to climb the
cliff near a nest it could
lead to nest
abandonment early in
the nesting season.
Human presence
doesn't necessarily
lead to stress or
abandonment as
shown by experiences
from the peregrine
reintroduction project.
No impact - habitat
changes not in
nesting habitat.
No impact - existing
roads used.
No impact - existing
roads used.
More human recreation in the area
below and above cliffs could result from
more trails and other recreational
facilities luring more humans into the
analysis area. The Border Route Tr. is
located above potential habitat. A trail
below isn't necessary for climbers to use
the cliffs, but it makes it more
convenient. Human presence in a
nesting territory isn't as detrimental as
once thought. But it would be better
avoided.
Connecticut
warbler
Oporornis agilis
Jack pine or lowland
conifer with a thick
ericaceous understory.
Area sensitive species
No
Marginal/
very limited
Not in
proposed
routes
unknown MN NHP
Database
2003 (lack of
records)
No impact
Existing roads used
No impact
New trail would
create a corridor
through an area
unlikely to be used
by this species. It is
not expected to be
affected by trail
users.
No impact
New trail would
create a corridor
through an area
unlikely to be used
by this species. It is
not expected to be
affected by trail
users.
No impact
New trail would
create a short
corridor through an
area unlikely to be
used by this species
No impact
Existing roads used
Habitat not affected; less than optmal
habitat in project area
Page 8 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 9
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Wilson's
phalarope
Phalaropus
tricolor
Large open wet
meadows
No No Janssen 1995 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Three-toed
woodpecker
Picoides
tridactylus
Coniferous forests with
numerous snags
No Records in
general area
Janssen 1995 No impact
Existing roads used
No impact
New trail would
create a corridor
through an area
unlikely to be used
by this species
No impact
New trail would
create a corridor
through an area
unlikely to be used
by this species
No impact
New trail would
create a short
corridor through an
area unlikely to be
used by this species
No impact
Existing roads used
Great gray owl
Strix nebulosa
Nesting habitat of
mature trees on wet soil
with >60% canopy
closure near open
foraging areas.
No
Not in
proposed
routes
No Lane; 18 years
of survey
No impact
Existing roads used
No impact
New trail in an area
unlikely to be used
by this species
No impact
New trail in an area
unlikely to be used
by this species
No impact
New, short trail in an
area unlikely to be
used by this species
No impact
Existing roads used
Sharp-tailed
grouse
Tympanuchus
phasianellus
Brushland complexes
(>5,000 acres) with
open areas, brush and
small trees. Also large,
open agricultural hay or
pasture with associated
brush habitat.
No
Not within
range
No MN DNR data
2005
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
REPTILES
Wood turtle
Clemmys
insculpta
(Glyptemys)
Upland and lowland
habitats with suitable
shade and insects for
forage. Riparian
habitats with open
sandy areas for nesting.
No
Not within
range
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Oldfield
and Moriarty
1994
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
FISH
Lake sturgeon
Acipenser
fulvescens
On SNF: Large lakes
and rivers in the
Hudson Bay drainage
No
Not within
range; no
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Shortjaw cisco
Coregonus
zenithicus
Lake Superior,
Saganaga and Gunflint
Lakes, possibly others.
No
Not within
range; no
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 9 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 10
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Northern brook
lamprey
Ichthyomyzon
fossor
Warm, medium-sized,
low-gradient streams
with sections of higher
gradient reaches
suitable for spawning.
Ammocoete's require
organically enriched,
sandy substrate until
metamorphosis.
No
closest
records in St.
Louis County
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
MOLLUSKS
Creek
heelsplitter
Lasmigona
compressa
Headwaters of larger
rivers. St. Louis river
and tributaries. Lake of
the Woods tributaries.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Black sandshell
Ligumia recta
Medium to large rivers. No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
INSECTS
Tiger beetle
Cicindela
denikei
Sandy or rocky
openings in northern
hardwood forest
communities. Northern
hardwoods or
coniferous stands with
jackpine, birch, willows
and poplar and sandy-
silty-stony soils. Rock
outcrops, sandy-silty-
gravelly areas with
rocks and stones.
No No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Mancinus
alpine Erebia
disa mancinus
Shady black spruce
swamp
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Red-disked
alpine Erebia
discoidalis
discoiddis
Black spruce areas No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 10 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 11
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Nabokov's (or
Northern) blue
Lycaeides idas
nabokovi
Vaccinium cespitosum
host in open sandy jack
pine areas. On SNF:
McNair management
area and Grand Marais
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Jutta arctic
Oeneis jutta
ascerta
Moderately forested
black spruce bogs with
sedges
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Freija's grizzled
skipper
Pyrgus
centaureae
freija
Known only from the
McNair special
management area.
Upland acidic meadow.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
VASCULAR
PLANTS
Moschatel
Adoxa
moschatellina
Shaded damp cliffs and
slopes in upland mature
northern hardwood
forest
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 11 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 12
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Long-leaved
arnica
Arnica
lonchophylla
Perennial herb; Has
been collected on cool
& moist cliffs and ledges
on North Shore and
BWCAW border. Arctic
disjunct. This plant is
very rare in Minnesota
and it only occurs in
Minnesota in the US.
Yes
This species
could have
become
extirpated
from all but
the Border
Lakes site. It
still exists
where first
collected in
1932.
No
Potential
exists for the
plant to be
here, but
recent
searches did
not find it.
MN NHP
Database
2003; Ownbey
and Morley
1992; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988; Gerdes
1998, 2001
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of viability.
Direct effects -
Constructing the trail is
not likely to affect the
cliffs on which this plant
could occur. If the sp.
existed here most likely it
would be on or at the
base of the cliff south of
the trail.
Indirect effects -
Opening this corridor
would change the
microclimate near it.
Those changes could
affect habitat on adjacent
cliffs. Effective
mitigations for narrow trail
corridor, and restricted
summer use should
reduce these potential
negative effects. The
determination statement
above relies on the
assumption that no
individuals would be
affected based on the
likely separation between
users and the species in
time (winter) and space
(slight buffer between trail
and cliff).
No impact.
The apparent cliffs
needed do not occur
near this route.
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
This species is one of the rarest plants
in N. America. It is one of several
disjunct species in the immediate area,
most of which are associated with the
unique cliffs, and all of which probably
should have national significance. The
potential effects of Alt. 2 on the unique
cliffs is the most difficult question of this
analysis. If we knew the species
occurred in the project area, there would
be questions about the likelihood of
effects. This species is so rare the effect
would be significant. Other trails in the
analysis area are not likely to affect this
species unless Alt 2 were in place. Then
additional trails may lead to more use of
the Alt 2 trail and the adjacent cliffs by
recreationists. This species seems
worthy of national listing.
Page 12 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 13
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Maidenhair
spleenwort
Asplenium
trichomanes
Perennial fern; In
crevices of moist,
mostly east facing cliffs,
ledges and talus, Rove
formation. Disjunct.
Specialized cliff hab,
only near one proposed
trail in the project
corridors.
Yes Yes MN NHP
Database
2003; Ownbey
and Morley
1992; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988
No impact
Not in habitat
With effective
mitigation may impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a trend
toward Federal listing
or loss of viability.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail could
possibly affect some
rock formation on
which this may occur.
It is very unlikely since
the known locations
are on the cliffs above
the proposed trail
route.
Indirect effects - the
trail corridor would
affect microclimate
(light, wind, moisture)
for some variable
distance from the
edges. This could have
negative effects on the
plant. The plant grows
on cliffs, where it is
already austere, so
effects are difficult to
predict.
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
New trails in Alts 2, 3, and 4, and in
other locations in the analysis area
would probably increase summer ATV
use. The trail of Alt 2 would be unlike
potential trails elsewhere in the analysis
area. It lies in a botanically unique area.
Recreationists exploring there, could
endanger sensitive plants. This plant is
not likely to occur in other locations in
the analysis area. Most of the known
sensitive plants are in a relatively
inaccessible area and are not potentially
threatened except by Alt. 2. If Alt 2
were in place, more recreation
opportunities from trails and other
developments in the analysis area may
increase potential for use in all seasons
on the Alt. 2 trail.
Page 13 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 14
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Alpine milkvetch
Astragalus
alpinus
Sandy, gravelly
fluctuating shorelines
with sparse vegetation.
Inland strand beach -
sparse veg
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Swamp beggar-
ticks
Bidens
discoidea
Wet habitats: silty
shores, hummocks in
floating mats and
swamps, partly
submerged logs
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Ownbey
and Morley
1992
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pointed
moonwort
Botrychium
acuminatum
Perennial fern; Open
habitats such as old log
landings, old dirt roads,
borrow pits
Possibly No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
Would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Page 14 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 15
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Triangle grape-
fern
Botrychium
lanceolatum
Mostly northern
hardwood forests, also
oldfields, old logging
roads, trails
Possibly No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Page 15 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 16
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Lance-leaf grape-
fern
Botrychium
lanceolatum var
augustisegment
um
Mostly northern
hardwood forests, also
oldfields, old logging
roads, trails
Possibly No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Probably not in
habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Page 16 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 17
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Moonwort grape-
fern
Botrychium
lunaria
Open habitats such as
old log landings, sawmill
sites, old building sites
Possibly No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Page 17 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 18
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Michigan
moonwort
Botrychium
michiganense
(hesperium)
Open habitats such as
old log landing, old dirt
roads, gravel pits,
powerline corridors,
borrow pits. Also beach
ridges, old fields, trails,
and dredge spoil dumps
Unknown No MN NHP
Database;
Forest Service
data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Goblin fern
Botrychium
mormo
Mesic deciduous forest
with thick leaf layer,
open understory
No
Not in range
or habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 18 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 19
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Pale moonwort
Botrychium
pallidum
Open, disturbed
habitats, log landings,
roadsides, dunes,
sandy gravel pits.
Unknown No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Ternate grape-
fern
Botrychium
rugulosum
(=ternatum)
Generally open habitats,
such as old log landings
and edges of trails.
Unknown No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
destroy plants. It is
very unlikely since
favorable habitat is
discontinuous.
Indirect effects -
not expected.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Page 19 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 20
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Least moonwort
Botrychium
simpl ex
Generally open habitats,
such as old log
landings, roadside ditch,
trails, open fields, base
of cliff, railroad rights of
way
Unknown No MN NHP
Database
2003; Forest
Service data
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
state's Stump River
Rd.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
not expected from
use of snowmobiles.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
possibility species
could be found along
edge of CC 16.
However, habitat is
discontinuous.
Direct effects -
Constructing trail
would reconstruct
road shoulder and
could destroy plants.
Indirect effects -
some habitat may be
created next to the
new trail along CC
16.
No impact
Not in habitat
Very slight potential for immediate direct
impacts to this species and habitat
along CC 16, but in long term the
widened shoulder (Alt.4) would create
habitat for this species. It would create
more habitat for invasive species, too.
Increases in these invasives would
threaten native species, esp. the rare,
sensitive ones. Trail construction can
create habitat throughout the analysis
area. New habitat created by trail
construction could be reduced by ATV
use, but this plant could also occur at
the rd/tr edge where the ATV's weren't
used.
Floating marsh-
marigold
Caltha natans
Perennial herb; shallow
water of pools, ditches,
sheltered lake margins,
slow moving creeks,
sloughs and oxbows,
pools in shrub swamps
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 20 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 21
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Fairy slipper
Calypso bulbosa
Hummocks in northern
white cedar swamps,
moist to wet lowland
conifer swamps, and to
lesser extent in upland
coniferous forests
Yes
Particularly
north of the
Border Route
Trail
No Smith 1993,
USDA Forest
Service 2003a,
Gerdes 1998,
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Species is
possible esp. on
west half of
proposed trail.
Direct effects - trail
construction is most
likely to be done in
summer or fall when
it could destroy
plants directly.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
would probably not
survive changes in
water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Species
may occur, esp. in
the north half of
proposed trail.
Direct effects - trail
construction is most
likely to be done in
summer or fall when
it could destroy
plants directly.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
would probably not
survive changes in
water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
This plant could occur in favorable habitat
throughout the analysis area. New trails would
probably increase summer ATV use. People and
machines unintentionally carry seeds bringing
invasive, nonnative plants into an area. Purple
loosestrife occurs at the entry point at Little John
Lk. Leafy spurge occurs in a BWCAW campsite
on the west side of McFarland LK. Spotted
knapweed occurs in other areas of the Rove Slate
region. Hawkweed, lupine, tansy, and many other
non-natives are common along the roads and
trails of Cook County. The spread of foreign
worms is another likely result where angling is
probably the major recreation in the area. Alien
plants and worms bring changes in flora/fauna
that are usually detrimental to rare/sensitive,
native spp.
Katahdin sedge
Carex
katahdinensis
In seasonally moist,
gravelly/sandy soil;
along shores of large
and small lakes;
margins of ephemeral
pools; associated with
seasonal flooding;
disjunct species.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988; Gerdes
1998, 2001;
Ownbey and
Morley 1992
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 21 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 22
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
New England
sedge
Carex novae-
angliae
Moist woods with sugar
maple, also with birch,
aspen, tall shrubs;
yellow birch and white
spruce dominated forest
No No USDA Forest
Service 2002a,
L. Gerdes
1998
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Short sedge
Carex rossii
Perennial graminoid;
Rocky summits, dry
exposed cliff faces,
rocky slopes, in east
Border Lakes
subsection; disjunct
species from main
areas of occurrence in
western North America.
Yes
Habitat is in
the analysis
area, but is
not in one of
the proposed
corridors.
Yes
Recently
rediscovered
in the state.
Although is
found in only
one site, it is
not currently
listed in
Minnesota.
MN NHP
Database
2003; Gerdes
1998, 2001
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
No impact May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
To the degree the trail improvements
encourage use, increasing human
presence and exploration in the area,
the plants may be affected by Forest
users. Increased ATV use could
increase use of the Border Route hiking
trail which crosses the current approach
to S. Fowl Lk (SFR328). The Border Rt
Tr. is located close to the habitat of this
plant. The proposed trail corridors would
not directly affect this species. But they
are loosely connected with other forms
of recreation in the area. Hiking traffic
on the Border Route Trail is not well
connected with these proposed
snowmobile routes. With more
demonstrable connection, this project
and others like it could lead to a concern
over viability. The Minnesota population
is a disjunct and at one site. As such the
FWS could list this population segment
as threatened or endangered. Listing
this plant seems warranted.
Douglas's
hawthorn
Crataegus
douglasii
North Shore rocky,
gravelly
streambeds/banks and
open areas; rocky
borders of woods
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 22 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 23
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Ram's-head
lady's slipper
Cypripedium
arietinum
Wide variety of forests,
both upland and
lowland, but in MN
predominantly in white
cedar swamps; also in
forests dominated by
jack pine, red pine, or
white pine
Yes No MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988; Gerdes
1998, 2001;
Ownbey and
Morley 1992
No impact
Not in habitat
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Species
quite possible esp.
on west half of
proposed trail.
Direct effects - trail
construction is most
likely to be done in
summer or fall when
it could destroy
plants directly.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
would probably not
survive changes in
water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Species
quite possible esp.
on north half of
proposed trail.
Direct effects - trail
construction is most
likely to be done in
summer or fall when
it could destroy
plants directly.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
would probably not
survive changes in
water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
No impact
Not in habitat
No impact
Not in habitat
New trails in the analysis area would probably
increase summer ATV use. The trail of Alt 2
would be unlike potential trails elsewhere in the
analysis area. It lies in a botanically unique area.
Recreationists exploring there, could endanger
sensitive plants. People and machines
unintentionally carry seeds bringing invasive,
nonnative plants into an area. Purple loosestrife
occurs at the entry point at Little John Lk. Leafy
spurge occurs in a BWCAW campsite on the west
side of McFarland LK. Spotted knapweed occurs
in other areas of the Rove Slate region.
Hawkweed, lupine, tansy, and many other non-
natives are common along the roads and trails of
Cook County. The spread of foreign worms is
another likely result where angling is probably the
major recreation in the area. Alien plants and
worms bring changes in flora/fauna that are
usually detrimental to rare/sensitive, native spp.
This species should be relatively safe except in or
immediate to a trail. Most of the known sensitive
plants are in a relatively inaccessible area and are
not likely to be threatened by potential trails.
Page 23 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 24
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Rough-fruited
fairy bells
Disporum
trachycarpum
Semi-open jack pine
forest, with aspen,
birch, shallow rocky
soils, in east Border
Lakes subsection; new
to Minnesota.
Yes
Habitat is in
the analysis
area, but is
not in one of
the proposed
corridors.
Yes MN NHP
Database
2003; Gerdes
1998, 2001
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. No impact
Proposal not in the
habitat. Considering
some possible
cumulative effects
from human
population, a weak
link may be made
between this species
and the proposed
trail.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
To the degree the trail improvements
encourage human presence and
exploration in the area, the plants may
be affected by Forest users. A fairly
slight possibility exists that increased
ATV use could be very loosely
connected to an increase use of the
Border Route hiking trail which crosses
the current approach to S. Fowl Lk
(SFR328). The Border Rt Tr. is located
close to the site of this plant. It seems
more likely that any increased use of the
Border Route Tr. would be a function of
more hikers coming into the area. The
proposed trail corridors themselves
would seem to make a weak link with
affects to this species.
Neat spike-rush
Eleocharis nitida
Mineral soil of wetlands,
often w/ open canopy
and disturbance, such
as logging roads/ditches
through wetlands
Unknown,
Remotely
possible
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988; Gerdes
1998, 2001;
Ownbey and
Morley 1992
No impact No impact No impact No impact No impact
Moor rush
Juncus stygius
Shallow pools in non-
forested peatlands,
often in a sedge-
dominated community
No
Not very
likely, favors
weakly acidic
peatlands.
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988; Gerdes
1998, 2001
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Creeping rush
Juncus subtilis
Sandy lakeshore – only
known occurrence is in
BWCAW; one location
in Minnesota.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Gerdes
1998, 2001
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 24 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 25
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Vasey's rush
Juncus vaseyi
Seasonally wet soil of
wetlands, often w/ open
canopy and
disturbance, such as
roadside ditch, trail,
gravel pit, often with
sedges and grasses
No No Walton 1999,
Walton 2000c;
Gerdes 1998,
2001; Ownbey
and Morley
1992
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Auricled
twayblade
Listera
auriculata
On alluvial or lake-
deposited sands or
gravels, with occasional
seasonal flooding,
associated with riparian
alder or spruce/fir forest
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
American shore-
grass
Littorella uniflora
Shallow margins of
nutrient-poor lakes,
seepage lakes, sandy
substrate, may have
fine gravel/organic soil.
Fluctuating water up to
about 1 meter.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 25 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 26
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Large-leaved
sandwort
Arenaria
(Moehringia)
macrophylla
Cliffs/rock outcrops,
talus, conifer sites on
shallow soils, pine
plantation with rocky
outcrops; usually semi-
open shrub or tree
canopy; disjunct
Yes
Two
locations in
the project
area, one
shaded,
somewhat
moist, the
other dry
Yes MN NHP
Database
2003; Gerdes
1998, 2001
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause
a trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability as long as
mitigations are
effective.
Direct effects -
potential disruption to
plants as the trail is
constructed. It
depends on extent of
known site.
Indirect effects -the
possible microsite
effects of this trail (e.g.
drying, increased light,
air currents) have a
slight potential to
provide more favorable
habitat. On the other
hand different
microclimates could
support different
competitors. So, the
trail could reduce
favorable habitat, but it
would be mitigated to
avoid significant
microsite effects.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability.
Direct effects -
none expected.
Indirect effects -
the effects could be
described mostly as
cumulative effects
(see last column).
To the degree the trail improvements
encourage human presence and
exploration in the area, the plants may
be affected by Forest users. Increased
ATV use on these snowmobile trails
could increase hiking on the Border
Route hiking trail which crosses the
current approach to S. Fowl Lk
(SFR328). The Border Rt Tr. is located
close to one of the known sites of this
plant. Alternatives 1, 3, 4, and 5 use the
existing trail corridor from SFR328 to S.
Fowl Lk. An improved trail here could
result in more hiking on the Border
Route Tr., and higher risk of disturbance
to this and other sensitive species. It
seems more likely that any increased
use of the Border Route Tr. would be a
function of more hikers coming into the
area. The above alternatives would
seem to make a weak link with affects to
this species. Otherwise, the known
sensitive plants are relatively
inaccessible.
Fall dropseed
muhly
Muhlenbergia
uniflora
Wet sandy beaches,
floating peat mats
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dwarf water-lily
Nymphaea
leibergii
Slow moving streams,
rivers, beaver
impoundments 1-2 m
deep. Occurs at outer
margin of emergent
vegetation.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 26 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 27
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Chilean sweet
cicely
Osmorhiza
berteroi
Northern hardwood
forest dominated by
sugar maple on North
Shore.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sticky locoweed
Oxytropis
borealis var
viscida
(=Oxytropis
viscida var
viscida)
Perennial herb; Slate
cliff and talus slopes in
east Border Lakes
subsection. Only one of
three arctic/alpine
disjunct populations in
US and Canada.
Yes Yes
One
location.
Shrinking
population?
MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988; Gerdes
1998, 2001;
Ownbey and
Morley 1992
No impact
Alternatives 1, 3, 4,
and 5 use the
existing trail corridor
from SFR328 to So.
Fowl Lk. This
corridor does not
threaten the cliff, the
only known site in
Minnesota, where
these disjuncts
survive.
No impact
Apparently the cliffs
to the west of this
location, beside
which this alternative
would create a trail,
do not have this
species.
No impact
Alternatives 1, 3, 4,
and 5 use the
existing trail corridor
from SFR328 to So.
Fowl Lk. This
corridor does not
threaten the cliff, the
only known site in
Minnesota, where
these disjuncts
survive.
No impact
Alternatives 1, 3, 4,
and 5 use the
existing trail corridor
from SFR328 to So.
Fowl Lk. This
corridor does not
threaten the cliff, the
only known site in
Minnesota, where
these disjuncts
survive.
No impact
Alternatives 1, 3, 4,
and 5 use the
existing trail corridor
from SFR328 to So.
Fowl Lk. This
corridor does not
threaten the cliff, the
only known site in
Minnesota, where
these disjuncts
survive.
The population seems to be declining,
but it doesn't appear to be related to
human presence or activities in the
area. Whether or not human caused
climatic changes have had an effect is
unknown. Presumeably with global
warming will come losses of disjunct
populations and shifts in species'
occurrence and range. It would seem
this species would qualify for federal
listing with concern for population
segments. Concern for impacts would
be more related to the behavior of hikers
using the Border Route Trail.
Club-spur orchid
Platanthera
clavellata
Floating bog mats,
sphagnum, stunted
conifer swamp, mixed
spruce tamarack,
borrow pits, winter
logging roads
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Western Jacob's
ladder
Polemonium
occidentale ssp.
lacustre
Primarily white cedar
swamps, also mixed
conifer swamps; thrives
in openings
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003, Carlson
and Sather
2001
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Braun's holly-
fern
Polystichum
braunii
Perennial fern; Cool
shady cliffs & slopes in
northern hardwoods.
North Shore is extreme
western edge of range.
No
Project not in
habitat.
No MN NHP
Database
2003, Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988, Gerdes
1998
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 27 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 28
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Lesser
wintergreen or
Small shinleaf
Pyrola minor
Black spruce swamps,
and ecotone between
uplands and lowland
alder/conifer swamp,
prefers closed canopy
Yes Yes
Known
location
about a mile
north of
project area.
MN NHP
Database
2003; Walton
1997, Gerdes
1998, 2001
No impact
Existing routes used
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Favorable
habitat on west half
of proposed route.
That area is also
closest to the known
location of this
species.
Direct effects -
potential disruption
to plants as the trail
is constructed.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
could be negatively
affected by changes
in water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
Mitigation should
restrict these effects.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Possibility
this plant could exist
in the section
between Wooley's
Bluff and the Stump
R.
Direct effects -
potential disruption
to plants as the trail
is constructed.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
would probably not
survive changes in
water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Very slight
chance this species
could exist in the
section between
Wooley's Bluff and
CC16.
Direct effects -
potential disruption
to plants as the trail
is constructed.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
would probably not
survive changes in
water flow and
overhead canopy in
these affected areas.
No impact
Existing roads and
trails used.
New trails in Alts 2, 3, and 4 would probably
increase summer ATV use. The trail of Alt 2
would be unlike potential trails elsewhere in the
analysis area. It lies in a botanically unique area.
Recreationists exploring there, could endanger
sensitive plants. People and machines
unintentionally carry seeds bringing invasive,
nonnative plants into an area. Purple loosestrife
occurs at the entry point at Little John Lk. Leafy
spurge occurs in a BWCAW campsite on the west
side of McFarland LK. Spotted knapweed occurs
in other areas of the Rove Slate region.
Hawkweed, lupine, tansy, and many other non-
natives are common along the roads and trails of
Cook County. The spread of foreign worms is
another likely result where angling is probably the
major recreation in the area. Alien plants and
worms bring changes in flora/fauna that are
usually detrimental to rare/sensitive, native spp.
Most of the known sensitive plants are in a
relatively inaccessible area and are not likely to
be threatened except by Alt. 2.
Cloudberry
Rubus
chamaemorus
Black spruce/sphagnum
forest, acidic. Superior
NF at southern edge of
species range
No
Project not in
habitat. A
disjunct
species
No
Known in
only one
location in
Minnesota
MN NHP
Database
2003, Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 28 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 29
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Nodding
saxifrage
Saxifraga
cernua
Cliffs, ledges, diabase
cliff (calcium based
feldspars). One
location in MN in open
cliff. An arctic/alpine
disjunct.
No
Project not in
habitat as it
is known.
No
The only
known
location in
the state is
to the west
of the project
area. It is a
cliff dwelling
species but
the rock
substrate is
apparently
different.
MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988, Gerdes
1998, 2001
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 29 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 30
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Encrusted
(Livelong)
saxifrage
Saxifraga
paniculata
(=aizoon)
spp.Neogaea
Cliffs, sheltered
crevices, and ledges of
north-facing cliffs;
Arctic/alpine disjunct.
Yes Yes MN NHP
Database
2003, Gerdes
1998, 2001
No impact
Alternative 1 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the cliffs on either
side of the corridor
where these
disjuncts survive.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Favorable
habitat on west two
thirds of proposed
route, the area
closest to the known
locations on cliffs.
Direct effects -
potential disruption
to plants as the trail
is constructed.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This could
have negative
effects on the plant.
The plant grows on
cliffs, where it is
already austere, so
effects are difficult to
predict. Mitigations
should protect many
individuals and
No impact
Alternative 3 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
This corridor does
not threaten the cliffs
on either side of the
corridor where these
disjuncts survive.
The section of trail
between McFarland
Lk. and Stump R. is
also adjacent to
steep tography. The
species probably
doesn't occur here.
The changes
brought on by the
trail probably would
not prove fatal to any
of this species if
located there.
No impact
Alternative 4 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the cliffs on either
side of the corridor
where these
disjuncts survive.
No impact
Alternative 5 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the cliffs on either
side of the corridor
where these
disjuncts survive.
New trails in in the analysis area would probably
increase summer ATV use. The cliffs should be
unaffected by other trail alternatives elsewhere.
Exploring recreationists could endanger sensitive
plants. Mitigation measures should reduce
potential. Sensitive plants on the cliffs should
remain unthreatened by other recreational and
management activities in the area. Perhaps listing
should be considered for this species, occurring
at nine sites in Minnesota and some in northern
New England. Fate of rare species seems to rest
with public interest.
Northern bur-
reed
Sparganium
glomeratum
Floating muck mats in
emergent wetland
habitat such as moats,
pond margins, road
ditches
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 30 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 31
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Awlwort
Subularia
aquatica
Beach zone of sandy
nutrient-poor lakes.
Shallow lake margins.
Submerged or emerged,
or stranded. 15-45 cm
deep water, but can
occur deeper. Can
flower while stranded,
or under other
conditions.
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Canada yew
Taxus
canadensis
Wide variety of uplands
and lowlands, including
cedar/ash swamps,
talus and cliffs, northern
hardwoods, aspen/birch
forest
Yes Yes Walton 2001,
Schmoller
2001, USDA
Forest Service
2003a, Forest
Service
records;
Gerdes 2001
No impact
Current roads would
be used.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause
a trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Favorable
habitat esp. in west
two thirds of proposed
route.
Direct effects -
potential disruption to
plants as the trail is
constructed.
Indirect effects - the
trail corridor would
affect microclimate
(light, wind, moisture)
for some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant may
not be affected by
these changes
because it grows in a
wide variety of
habitats. But because
the genome of these
plants may be adapted
to moister, cooler
conditions, the
changes could destroy
some plants.
Mitigations should
protect individuals if
not in or directly
adjacent to the trail.
No impact
Alternative 3 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This species is
less likely in the
section of trail
between McFarland
Lk. and Stump R.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
This corridor near
So. Fowl Lk. does
not threaten the
habitat on either side
of the corridor where
these plants exist.
The section of trail
between McFarland
Lk. and Stump R. is
also adjacent to
steep tography and
the changes brought
on by the trail could
destroy yew, but the
chances of this are
low. Mitigations
should protect many
individuals if present.
No impact
Alternative 4 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the habitat on either
side of the corridor
where these plants
exist. The other
segments are not
likely to affect this
species.
No impact
Alternative 5 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the habitat on either
side of the corridor
where these plants
exist.
New trails in Alts 2, 3, and 4 would
probably increase summer ATV use.
The trail of Alt 2 would lie close to
botanically unique cliffs. Recreationists
exploring there, could endanger
sensitive plants. Edge effect along the
trail will vary. Effects on the plants
would depend on trail orientation,
plant/water assoc. and position above or
below trail, effects to tree canopy, etc.
The trail should be constructed to
withstand ATV's; snowmobile trails often
become ATV trails. People and
machines can accidently carry seeds
bringing invasive, nonnative plants into
an area. Purple loosestrife occurs at the
entry point at Little John Lk. Leafy
spurge occurs in a BWCAW campsite
on the west side of McFarland LK.
Spotted knapweed occurs in other areas
of the Rove Slate region. Hawkweed,
lupine, tansy, and many other non-
natives are common along the roads
and trails of Cook County. Changes in
flora/fauna created by worms and alien
spps are usually detrimental to
rare/sensitive, native spp Mitigations
should help protect individuals if
present.
Page 31 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 32
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
False-asphodel
Tofieldia pusilla
Sedge mats at edges of
shoreline rock pools
along Lake Superior.
Arctic disjunct.
No No MN NHP
Database
2003
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Lance-leaved
violet
Viola lanceolata
Sandy to peaty
lakeshores; borders of
marshes and bogs,
damp sand ditches
No
Project not in
habitat
No MN NHP
Database
2003; Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988, Gerdes
1998
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Barren
strawberry
Waldsteinia
fragarioides
Upland coniferous and
deciduous forests, in
recently harvested
areas, established
plantations, and areas
with no recent harvest
Not likely No MN NHP
Database
2003, Gerdes
1998
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 32 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 33
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Smooth woodsia
Woodsia
glabella
Perennial fern; Moist,
north-facing cliffs along
Lake Superior. Also has
been found on slate
cliffs near Grand
Portage. Arctic
disjunct.
Very limited
chance it
would be
found here.
No MN NHP
Database
2003, Coffin
and
Pfannmuller
1988, Gerdes
1998, 2001
No impact
Alternative 1 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the cliffs on either
side of the corridor
where these
disjuncts could be
found.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Favorable
habitat on west two
thirds of proposed
route.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. This plant
may be affected by
these changes if the
trail comes close to
the cliffs and
changes the
microclimate.
Mitigations should
protect many
individuals if present.
No impact
Alternative 3 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
This corridor does
not threaten the cliffs
on either side of the
corridor where these
disjuncts could be
found. This species
is not expected on
the other segments
of the proposed trail.
No impact
Alternative 4 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the cliffs on either
side of the corridor
where these
disjuncts could be
found.
No impact
Alternative 5 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. This corridor
does not threaten
the cliffs on either
side of the corridor
where these
disjuncts could be
found.
New trails in Alts 2, 3, and 4 would probably
increase summer ATV use. The trail of Alt 2
would lie close to botanically unique cliffs.
Recreationists exploring there, could endanger
sensitive plants. Trail edge effect along the trail
will vary depending on trail orientation, plant/water
assoc. and position above or below trail, effects to
tree canopy, etc. The trail should be constructed
to withstand ATV's. People and machines
unintentionally carry seeds of invasive, nonnative
plants into an area. Purple loosestrife, leafy
spurge, and spotted knapweed occur in or near
the project area. Hawkweed, lupine, tansy, and
many other non-natives are common along the
roads and trails of Cook County. Alien
earthworms have also affected our ecosystem
consuming duff and destroying plants. These
alien species usually bring changes to native
flora/fauna, they are often detrimental to
rare/sensitive, native spp. This plant may not be
in the project area to be affected, however.
Page 33 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 34
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
NONVASCULAR
PLANTS
a lichen sp.
Arctoparmelia
centrifuga
Sunny rocks and open
talus slopes
Yes Yes Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002b
No impact
existing roads used
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Proposed
trail is close to
favorable habitat on
the cliffs about half
way along the
proposed route.
Direct effects -
potential disruption
to plants as the trail
is constructed.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. Apparently
grows in open and
shade so effects,
especially with
mitigations, are
uncertain.
No impact
Alternative 3 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. near where this
lichen occurs.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
This corridor does
not threaten the cliffs
on either side of the
corridor where this
lichen could be
found. This species
is not expected on
the other segments
of the proposed trail.
No impact
Alternative 4 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. near where this
lichen occurs.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
This corridor does
not threaten the cliffs
on either side of the
corridor where this
lichen could be
found. This species
is not expected on
the other segments
of the proposed trail.
No impact
Alternative 5 uses
the existing trail
corridor from
SFR328 to So. Fowl
Lk. near where this
lichen occurs.
Direct effects -
none expected
Indirect effects -
This corridor does
not threaten the cliffs
on either side of the
corridor where this
lichen could be
found. This species
is not expected on
the other segments
of the proposed trail.
a lichen sp.
Arctoparmelia
subcentrifuga
Sunny rocks and open
talus slopes
No No USDA Forest
Service 2000a,
and Wetmore
2000, 2001
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
a lichen sp.
Caloplaca
parvula
Smooth bark of young
black ash in moist,
humid old growth black
ash stand
No No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002c
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 34 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 35
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
Yellow ribbon
lichen
Cetraria
(=ahtiana)
aurescens
Conifer bark in lowland
conifer swamps (old
cedar/black spruce)
No No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002d
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
a lichen sp.
Cladonia wainoi
On rock outcrops and
thin soil – exposed sites
with lots of light
unknown No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002e
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
No impact
Proposed trail would
be at least a quarter
of a mile from
potential habitat near
cliffs where species
is most likely.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
Port-hole lichen
Menegazzia
terebrata
Cedar swamps,
especially old growth;
base of cedar trees
No No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002f
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 35 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 36
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
a Dog lichen
Peltigera
venosa
Soil and moist cliffs,
exposed root wads.
unknown No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002g
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
May impact
individuals but not
likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of
viability. Proposed
trail is close to
favorable habitat on
the cliffs about half
way along the
proposed route.
Direct effects -
potential disruption
to plants as the trail
is constructed.
Indirect effects -
the trail corridor
would affect
microclimate (light,
wind, moisture) for
some variable
distance from the
edges. Apparently
grows in open and
shade, so effects,
especially with
mitigations, are
uncertain.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used and not
directly associated
with cliffs where
species is most
likely.
Yellow
specklebelly
lichen
Pseudocyphellar
ia crocata
Mossy rocks, trees in
partially shaded, moist,
frequently foggy
habitats
No No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002h
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 36 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 37
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
a lichen sp.
Ramalina
thrausta
Cedar swamps,
especially old growth
unknown No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002i
No impact
existing roads and
trails used.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of viability.
Proposed trail goes
through old forest many
cedars esp. on the west
two thirds of trail.
Direct effects - potential
disruption to plants as the
trail is constructed.
Indirect effects - the
trail corridor would affect
microclimate (light, wind,
moisture) for some
variable distance from the
edges. This species
needs shade and
moisture. If this species is
present, individuals could
be affected, and the
population would probably
decline where the
microclimate becomes
drier and includes more
light. Mitigations should
protect many individuals if
present.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used. Species
not expected in the
other trail segments.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used. Species
not expected in the
other trail segments.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used.
Page 37 of 38
Prepared by wruss_ 6_05 Page 38
Common and
Scientific Name
Habitat Summary ²Suitable
Habitat
Known
Occurrence
Reasoning or
Source used
for Area
Occurrence
Finding
Cummulative Effects Determination of Effects
a lichen sp.
Sticta fuliginosa
On hardwoods in humid,
old growth cedar or ash
bogs
unknown No Wetmore
2000, 2001
USDA Forest
Service 2002j
No impact
existing roads and
trails used.
May impact individuals
but not likely to cause a
trend toward Federal
listing or loss of viability.
Proposed trail goes
through old forest; many
cedars and old birch esp.
on the west two thirds of
trail. Direct
effects - potential
disruption to plants as the
trail is constructed.
Indirect effects - the
trail corridor would affect
microclimate (light, wind,
moisture) for some
variable distance from the
edges. This species
apparently needs tree
overstory and moisture. If
this species is present,
individuals could be
affected, and the
population would probably
decline where the
microclimate becomes
drier and includes more
light. Mitigations should
protect many individuals if
present.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used. Species
not expected in the
other trail segments.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used. Species
not expected in the
other trail segments.
No impact
existing roads and
trails used.
a lichen sp.
Usnea
longissima
On old conifers in moist
situations, often in or
near a conifer or
hardwood swamp
No
Subspecies
not likely in
this setting
No Wetmore
2000, 2001,
USDA Forest
Service 2002k
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 38 of 38