biology 224 tom peavy sept 20 & 22, 2010

59
Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010 Slides derived from Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by Jonathan Pevsner> BLAST: Basic local alignment search tool

Upload: oki

Post on 01-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

BLAST : Basic local alignment search tool. Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010. Slides derived from Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by Jonathan Pevsner>. BLAST. BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) allows rapid sequence comparison of a query - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Biology 224Tom Peavy

Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Slides derived from Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by Jonathan Pevsner>

BLAST:Basic local alignment

search tool

Page 2: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

BLAST

BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)allows rapid sequence comparison of a querysequence against a database.

The BLAST algorithm is fast, accurate, and web-accessible.

Based on heuristic searching (word or k-tuple methodsinstead of dynamic programming such as global or local methods)

Page 3: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Why use BLAST?

BLAST searching is fundamental to understandingthe relatedness of any favorite query sequenceto other known proteins or DNA sequences.

Applications include• identifying orthologs and paralogs• discovering new genes or proteins• discovering variants of genes or proteins• investigating expressed sequence tags (ESTs)• exploring protein structure and function

Page 4: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Four components to a BLAST search

(1) Choose the sequence (query)

(2) Select the BLAST program

(3) Choose the database to search

(4) Choose optional parameters

Then click “BLAST”

Page 5: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Step 2: Choose

the BLAST

program

Page 6: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Choose the BLAST program

Program Input Database 1

blastn DNA DNA 1

blastp protein protein 6

blastx DNA protein 6

tblastn protein DNA 36

tblastx DNA DNA

Page 7: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

DNA potentially encodes six proteins

5’ CAT CAA 5’ ATC AAC 5’ TCA ACT

5’ GTG GGT 5’ TGG GTA 5’ GGG TAG

5’ CATCAACTACAACTCCAAAGACACCCTTACACATCAACAAACCTACCCAC 3’3’ GTAGTTGATGTTGAGGTTTCTGTGGGAATGTGTAGTTGTTTGGATGGGTG 5’

Page 8: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010
Page 9: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Step 3: choose the database

Examples:

nr = non-redundant (most general database)

refseq = references sequences

swissprot= Swiss protein database

pdb= protein data bank of structures

dbest = database of expressed sequence tags

dbsts = database of sequence tag sites

gss = genomic survey sequences

Human G + T = human genomic plus transcript

page 92-93

Page 10: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

BLAST: optional parameters

You can... • choose the organism to search• turn filtering on/off• change the substitution matrix• change the expect (e) value• change the word size • change the output (max # sequences)

Page 11: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

(range is 10 up to 20,000)

(PAM 30, 70; BL 45, 62, 80)

Page 12: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

filtering

Filtering can eliminate statistically significant but biologically uninteresting reports from the blast output (e.g., hits against common acidic-, basic- or proline-rich regions), leaving the more biologically interesting regions of the query sequence available for specific matching against database sequences.

Page 13: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Blast using Human proline-rich Salivary protein with Filtering

Page 14: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Fig. 4.8page 96

More significant hits with filtering turned off…

…and longer alignments

Page 15: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

(a) Query: human insulin NP_000198Program: blastpDatabase: C. elegans RefSeqDefault settings:Unfiltered (“composition-based statistics”)

Our starting point: search human insulin against worm RefSeq proteins by blastp using default parameters

Page 16: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Compositional adjustments

Amino acid substitution matrices may be adjusted in various ways to compensate for the amino acid compositions of the sequences being compared.

The simplest adjustment is to scale all substitution scores by an analytically determined constant, while leaving the gap scores fixed; this procedure is called "composition-based statistics" (Schaffer et al., 2001). The resulting scaled scores yield more accurate E-values than standard, unscaled scores.

A more sophisticated approach adjusts each score in a standard substitution matrix separately to compensate for the compositions of the two sequences being compared (Yu et al., 2003; Yu and Altschul, 2005; Altschul et al., 2005). Such "compositional score matrix adjustment" may be invoked only under certain specific conditions for which it has been empirically determined to be beneficial (Altschul et al., 2005); under all other conditions, composition-based statistics are used. Alternatively, compositional adjustment may be invoked universally.

Page 17: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

(b) Query: human insulin NP_000198Program: blastpDatabase: C. elegans RefSeqOption: No compositional adjustment

Note that the bit score, Expect value, and percent identity all change with the “no compositional adjustment” option

Page 18: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

(c) Query: human insulin NP_000198Program: blastpDatabase: C. elegans RefSeqOption: conditional compositional score matrix adjustment

Note that the bit score, Expect value, and percent identity all change with the compositional score matrix adjustment

Page 19: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

(e) Query: human insulin NP_000198Program: blastpDatabase: C. elegans RefSeqOption: Mask for lookup table only

Note that the bit score, Expect value, and percent identity could change with the “mask for lookup table only” option

Page 20: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Step 4b: optional formatting parameters

Alignment view

Descriptions

Alignments

Page 21: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Blastp search using human beta hemoglobin

Page 22: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010
Page 23: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

BLAST search output: graphical output

Page 24: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Links: U= Unigene; G= Entrez Gene; green symbol= PubChem BioAssay

High scoreslow E values

Cut-off:.05?10-10?

Page 25: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010
Page 26: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010
Page 27: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

BLAST search output: multiple alignment format

Page 28: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010
Page 29: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

expect value E = number of different alignmentswith scores equal to or greater than some score Sthat are expected to occur in a database search by chance.

E value of 1 indicates that in a database of this size,one match with a similar score is expected to occur by chance.

Page 30: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How a BLAST search works

“The central idea of the BLASTalgorithm is to confine attentionto segment pairs that contain aword pair of length w with a scoreof at least T.”

Altschul et al. (1990)

(Note: FASTA uses k-tuple instead of the BLAST term w)

Page 31: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How the original BLAST algorithm works: three phases

Phase 1: compile a list of word pairs (w=3)above threshold T

Example: for a human RBP query…FSGTWYA… (query word is in red)

A list of words (w=3) is:FSG SGT GTW TWY WYAYSG TGT ATW SWY WFAFTG SVT GSW TWF WYS

Page 32: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Pairwise alignment scoresare determined using a scoring matrix such asBlosum62

A 4 R -1 5 N -2 0 6 D -2 -2 1 6 C 0 -3 -3 -3 9 Q -1 1 0 0 -3 5 E -1 0 0 2 -4 2 5 G 0 -2 0 -1 -3 -2 -2 6 H -2 0 1 -1 -3 0 0 -2 8 I -1 -3 -3 -3 -1 -3 -3 -4 -3 4 L -1 -2 -3 -4 -1 -2 -3 -4 -3 2 4 K -1 2 0 -1 -1 1 1 -2 -1 -3 -2 5 M -1 -2 -2 -3 -1 0 -2 -3 -2 1 2 -1 5 F -2 -3 -3 -3 -2 -3 -3 -3 -1 0 0 -3 0 6 P -1 -2 -2 -1 -3 -1 -1 -2 -2 -3 -3 -1 -2 -4 7 S 1 -1 1 0 -1 0 0 0 -1 -2 -2 0 -1 -2 -1 4 T 0 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -2 -2 -1 -1 -1 -1 -2 -1 1 5 W -3 -3 -4 -4 -2 -2 -3 -2 -2 -3 -2 -3 -1 1 -4 -3 -2 11 Y -2 -2 -2 -3 -2 -1 -2 -3 2 -1 -1 -2 -1 3 -3 -2 -2 2 7 V 0 -3 -3 -3 -1 -2 -2 -3 -3 3 1 -2 1 -1 -2 -2 0 -3 -1 4 A R N D C Q E G H I L K M F P S T W Y V

Page 33: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Phase 1: compile a list of words (w=3)

GTW 6,5,11 22neighborhood ASW 6,1,11 18word hits ATW 0,5,11 16> threshold NTW 0,5,11 16

GTY 6,5,2 13 GNW 10

neighborhood GAW 9word hits< below threshold

(T=11)

Page 34: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How a BLAST search works: 3 phases

Phase 2:

Scan the database for entries that match the compiled list.

This is fast and relatively easy.

Page 35: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How a BLAST search works: 3 phases

Phase 3: when you manage to find a hit(i.e. a match between a “word” and a databaseentry), extend the hit in either direction.

Keep track of the score (use a scoring matrix)

Stop when the score drops below some cutoff.

KENFDKARFSGTWYAMAKKDPEG 50 RBP (query)

MKGLDIQKVAGTWYSLAMAASD. 44 lactoglobulin (hit)

Hit!extendextend

Page 36: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How a BLAST search works: 3 phases

Phase 3:

In the original (1990) implementation of BLAST,hits were extended in either direction.

In a 1997 refinement of BLAST, two independenthits are required. The hits must occur in closeproximity to each other. With this modification,only one seventh as many extensions occur,greatly speeding the time required for a search.

Page 37: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How a BLAST search works: threshold

You can modify the threshold parameter.

The default value for blastp is 11.

To change it, enter “-f 16” or “-f 5” in the advanced options.

Page 38: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Changing threshold for blastp nr RBP

Expect 10

(T=11)

1

(T=11)

10,000

(T=11)

10

(T=5)

10

(T=11)

10

(T=16)

10

(BL45)

10

(PAM70)

#hits to db 129m 129m 129m 112m 112m 112m 386m 129m

#sequences 1,043,455 1.0m 1.0m 907,000 907,000 907,000 1.0m 1.0m

#extensions 5.2m 5.2m 5.2m 508m 4.5m 73,788 30.2m 19.5m

#successful

extensions

8,367 8,367 8,367 11,484 7,288 1,147 9,088 13,873

#sequences

better than E

142 86 6,439 125 124 88 110 82

#HSPs>E

(no gapping)

53 46 6,099 48 48 48 60 66

#HSPs gapped

145 88 6,609 127 126 90 113 99

X1, X2, X3 16 (7.4 bits)

38 (14.6 bits)

64 (24.7 bits)

16

38

64

16

38

64

22

51

85

15

35

59

Page 39: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Changing threshold for blastp nr RBP

Expect 10

(T=11)

1

(T=11)

10,000

(T=11)

10

(T=5)

10

(T=11)

10

(T=16)

10

(BL45)

10

(PAM70)

#hits to db 129m 129m 129m 112m 112m 112m 386m 129m

#sequences 1,043,455 1.0m 1.0m 907,000 907,000 907,000 1.0m 1.0m

#extensions 5.2m 5.2m 5.2m 508m 4.5m 73,788 30.2m 19.5m

#successful

extensions

8,367 8,367 8,367 11,484 7,288 1,147 9,088 13,873

#sequences

better than E

142 86 6,439 125 124 88 110 82

#HSPs>E

(no gapping)

53 46 6,099 48 48 48 60 66

#HSPs gapped

145 88 6,609 127 126 90 113 99

X1, X2, X3 16 (7.4 bits)

38 (14.6 bits)

64 (24.7 bits)

16

38

64

16

38

64

22

51

85

15

35

59

Page 40: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Changing threshold for blastp nr RBP

Expect 10

(T=11)

1

(T=11)

10,000

(T=11)

10

(T=5)

10

(T=11)

10

(T=16)

10

(BL45)

10

(PAM70)

#hits to db 129m 129m 129m 112m 112m 112m 386m 129m

#sequences 1,043,455 1.0m 1.0m 907,000 907,000 907,000 1.0m 1.0m

#extensions 5.2m 5.2m 5.2m 508m 4.5m 73,788 30.2m 19.5m

#successful

extensions

8,367 8,367 8,367 11,484 7,288 1,147 9,088 13,873

#sequences

better than E

142 86 6,439 125 124 88 110 82

#HSPs>E

(no gapping)

53 46 6,099 48 48 48 60 66

#HSPs gapped

145 88 6,609 127 126 90 113 99

X1, X2, X3 16 (7.4 bits)

38 (14.6 bits)

64 (24.7 bits)

16

38

64

16

38

64

22

51

85

15

35

59

Page 41: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

For blastn, the word size is typically 7, 11, or 15 (EXACT match). Changing word size is like changing threshold of proteins.w=15 gives fewer matches and is faster than w=11 or w=7.

For megablast, the word size is 28 and can be adjusted to 64. What will this do? Megablast is VERY fast for finding closely related DNA sequences!

Page 42: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

How to interpret a BLAST search: expect value

It is important to assess the statistical significanceof search results.

For global alignments, the statistics are poorly understood.

For local alignments (including BLAST search results),the statistics are well understood. The scores follow an extreme value distribution (EVD) rather than a normal distribution.

Page 43: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

x

pro

bab

ilit

y

normal distribution

0 1 2 3 4 5-1-2-3-4-5

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0

Page 44: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

x

pro

bab

ilit

y

extreme value distribution

normal distribution

The probability density function of the extreme value distribution (characteristic value u=0 and

decay constant =1)

0 1 2 3 4 5-1-2-3-4-5

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0

Page 45: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

The expect value E is the number of alignmentswith scores greater than or equal to score Sthat are expected to occur by chance in a database search.

An E value is related to a probability value p.

The key equation describing an E value is:

E = Kmn e-S

How to interpret a BLAST search: expect value

Page 46: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010
Page 47: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

This equation is derived from a descriptionof the extreme value distribution

S = the score

E = the expect value = the numberof HSPs expected to occur witha score of at least S

m, n = the length of two sequences

, K = Karlin Altschul statistics

E = Kmn e-S

Page 48: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Some properties of the equation E = Kmn e-S

• The value of E decreases exponentially with increasing S (higher S values correspond to better alignments). Very high scores correspond to very low E values.

•The E value for aligning a pair of random sequences must be negative! Otherwise, long random alignments would acquire great scores

• Parameter K describes the search space (database).

• For E=1, one match with a similar score is expected to occur by chance. For a very much larger or smaller database, you would expect E to vary accordingly

Page 49: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

From raw scores to bit scores

• There are two kinds of scores: raw scores (calculated from a substitution matrix) and bit scores (normalized scores)

• Bit scores are comparable between different searches because they are normalized to account for the use of different scoring matrices and different database sizes

S’ = bit score = (S - lnK) / ln2

The E value corresponding to a given bit score is:E = mn 2 -S’

Bit scores allow you to compare results between differentdatabase searches, even using different scoring matrices.

Page 50: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

The expect value E is the “number of alignmentswith scores greater than or equal to score Sthat are expected to occur by chance in a database search.”

A p value is the “probability of a chance alignmentoccuring with the score in question or better.”

p = 1 - e-

How to interpret BLAST: E values and p values

Page 51: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Very small E values are very similar to p values. E values of about 1 to 10 are far easier to interpretthan corresponding p values.

E p10 0.999954605 0.993262052 0.864664721 0.632120560.1 0.09516258 (about 0.1)0.05 0.04877058 (about 0.05)0.001 0.00099950 (about 0.001)0.0001 0.0001000

How to interpret BLAST: E values and p values

Page 52: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Search space= represents all sites at which query canalign to database sequences

However need to calculate Effective Search Space since the ends of a sequence are less likely to alignin an average-sized alginment

Effective search space= (m-L)(n-L)

Where L = length of an average sized alignment (Altschul and Gish, 1996)

Page 53: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Changing E, T & matrix for blastp nr RBP

Expect 10

(T=11)

1

(T=11)

10,000

(T=11)

10

(T=5)

10

(T=11)

10

(T=16)

10

(BL45)

10

(PAM70)

#hits to db 129m 129m 129m 112m 112m 112m 386m 129m

#sequences 1,043,455 1.0m 1.0m 907,000 907,000 907,000 1.0m 1.0m

#extensions 5.2m 5.2m 5.2m 508m 4.5m 73,788 30.2m 19.5m

#successful

extensions

8,367 8,367 8,367 11,484 7,288 1,147 9,088 13,873

#sequences

better than E

142 86 6,439 125 124 88 110 82

#HSPs>E

(no gapping)

53 46 6,099 48 48 48 60 66

#HSPs gapped

145 88 6,609 127 126 90 113 99

X1, X2, X3 16 (7.4 bits)

38 (14.6 bits)

64 (24.7 bits)

16

38

64

16

38

64

22

51

85

15

35

59

Page 54: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Changing E, T & matrix for blastp nr RBP

Expect 10

(T=11)

1

(T=11)

10,000

(T=11)

10

(T=5)

10

(T=11)

10

(T=16)

10

(BL45)

10

(PAM70)

#hits to db 129m 129m 129m 112m 112m 112m 386m 129m

#sequences 1,043,455 1.0m 1.0m 907,000 907,000 907,000 1.0m 1.0m

#extensions 5.2m 5.2m 5.2m 508m 4.5m 73,788 30.2m 19.5m

#successful

extensions

8,367 8,367 8,367 11,484 7,288 1,147 9,088 13,873

#sequences

better than E

142 86 6,439 125 124 88 110 82

#HSPs>E

(no gapping)

53 46 6,099 48 48 48 60 66

#HSPs gapped

145 88 6,609 127 126 90 113 99

X1, X2, X3 16 (7.4 bits)

38 (14.6 bits)

64 (24.7 bits)

16

38

64

16

38

64

22

51

85

15

35

59

Page 55: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Changing E, T & matrix for blastp nr RBP

Expect 10

(T=11)

1

(T=11)

10,000

(T=11)

10

(T=5)

10

(T=11)

10

(T=16)

10

(BL45)

10

(PAM70)

#hits to db 129m 129m 129m 112m 112m 112m 386m 129m

#sequences 1,043,455 1.0m 1.0m 907,000 907,000 907,000 1.0m 1.0m

#extensions 5.2m 5.2m 5.2m 508m 4.5m 73,788 30.2m 19.5m

#successful

extensions

8,367 8,367 8,367 11,484 7,288 1,147 9,088 13,873

#sequences

better than E

142 86 6,439 125 124 88 110 82

#HSPs>E

(no gapping)

53 46 6,099 48 48 48 60 66

#HSPs gapped

145 88 6,609 127 126 90 113 99

X1, X2, X3 16 (7.4 bits)

38 (14.6 bits)

64 (24.7 bits)

16

38

64

16

38

64

22

51

85

15

35

59

Page 56: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Sometimes a real match has an E value > 1

…try a reciprocal BLAST to confirm

Page 57: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Sometimes a similar E value occurs for a short exact match and long less exact match

Page 58: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Assessing whether proteins are homologous

RBP4 and PAEP:Low bit score, E value 0.49, 24% identity (“twilight zone”).But they are indeed homologous. Try a BLAST search with PAEP as a query, and you will find many other lipocalins.

Page 59: Biology 224 Tom Peavy Sept 20 & 22, 2010

Searching with a multidomain protein, HIV-1 pol