biology, the mith of evolution

BIOLOGY

THE MYTH OF

EVOLUTION

Biology, the myth of evolution, by Scribe Valdemir M. Menezes

[ 2 ]

PURPOSE OF THIS WORK

The literary materials author not-for-profit, or generate

you any type of revenue. Book costs are only to cover the costs

of production, transportation, taxes and resellers. Your

satisfaction is to contribute to the good of education, a better

quality of life for all people and living things, and to glorify the

only Almighty God.

CONTACTS:

www.youtube.com/user/storytellervaldemir

www.facebook.com/menezes.scribe.3

Blog: teoriadaevolucao-biblia.blogspot.com.br

E-mail: [email protected]

www.dailymotion.com/scribevaldemir

AUTHORIZATION

The book may be reproduced and distributed by any

means, used by any religious, educational or cultural entity

without permission of the author.


[ 3 ]

AUTHOR: Valdemir Mota de Menezes a degree in Biological

Sciences and History at the Metropolitan University of Santos, has the degree

in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Theology from the College of

the Assemblies of God of Santos, was born in Itabaiana/Sergipe/Brazil, in

1969.

M543 Menezes, Valdemir, 1969

Biology The Myth of Evolution/ Valdemir Mota de Menezes, Cubatao/SP,

Amazon.com Clubedosautores.com.br, 2015

145 p. ; 21 cm

ISBN-13: 978-1508536536

ISBN-10: 1508536538

1. Biology 2. Theory of evolution 3. Evolucionism

4. Criacionism I - Title

CDD 570

CDU 577


[ 4 ]

DESCRIPTION

This book BIOLOGY has the definite purpose of

refuting the theory of evolution and exalt God as the one

responsible for creating. We dedicate this volume to the Creator

that is very close to men, as the Scripture says in Acts 17.24-28.

Through this book, we tax God with the title of THE LORD OF

LIFE. Men announced this literature that their existence here

originated from a CREATION ACT and not a process of

evolution. The true believers in God, this book will reinforce

their beliefs regarding the origin of life and of man. Scientists

request reconsideration of theories that hinder the development

of science, noting that no belief should divert research at its sole

purpose: THE TRUTH.


[ 5 ]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

I - THE PURPOSE OF BIOLOGY

II - ANATOMY

1 - Comparative anatomy

2 - Brain Power

3 - Hand Anatomy

4 - Skull

5 - Anatomy of the spine

6 - The prehistoric man

III - HISTOLOGY

1 - The skin

IV - CTOLOGY

1 - Chromosomes

2 - Number and size of cells

3 - Cellular Database


[ 6 ]

4 - Scourge Bacterial

V - PHYSIOLOGY

1 - vocal apparatus

VI - STOICHIOMETRY

1 - DNA

VII - BIODYNAMIC

VIII - ONTOGENY

1 - Embryology

IX - GENETIC

1 - Inheritance

2 - Hybridization

3 - Mutation

X - PHYLOGENY

1 - The history of living things

2 - Spontaneous Generation

3 - Inheritance of Acquired Characters

4 - Natural Selection


[ 7 ]

5 - Mutation

6 - The steps of evolution

7 - bipedalism

XI - BIOGEOGRAPHY

1 - Adaptation

XII - SYSTEMATIC

1 - The kingdoms

2 - Classification of man

3 - Family

4 - Kingdom Protista - Algae

XIII - PALEONTOLOGY

1 - The Ages

2 - Cambrian Period

3 - Missing Link

4 - The prehistoric man

A - Ramapithecus

B - Australopithecus afarensis


[ 8 ]

C - Australopithecus africanus

D - Australopithecus robustus

E - Homo habilis

F - Homo Erectus

G - Homo Sapiens

H - Homo neanderthalensis

I - Homo sapiens sapiens

J - Cro-Magnon

5 - Bible Paleontology

6 - Dating

A - Carbon 14

B - Potassium-Argon

CONCLUSION

1 Consequences of Theory of Evolution


[ 9 ]

BIOLOGY

INTRODUCTION

Biology is the study of life, and this word was used the

first time by Lamarck in France in the year 1801. Our intention

in studying biology as a theological matter is mainly explained

by the THEORY OF EVOLUTION, as this philosophical

doctrine conflicts with the doctrine the biblical CREATION.

Only illustrative photo

It is the consensus among evolutionary scientists to determine how

the scientific arguments for the theory of evolution

This book will not make much use of the Bible to prove

the creation, has given that it is evident and clear that in all the

Scriptures this doctrine is strong. So our readers should

understand that we fight fire with fire, or try to use scientific

arguments to rebut the philosophical theory of evolution. More


[ 10 ]

than 100 years after Darwin and the theory of evolution has not

been proven and is, therefore, a vain philosophy.

THE LANGUAGE OF EVOLUTIONISTS

Evolutionists demonstrate the fragility of their theories

by own vocabulary that often they use when they try to explains

it. If evolution were true, their claims should be made with

conviction and not using dubious terms and citing possibilities

that most demonstrate the power of imagination of evolutionists

than proven facts.

Just to see our readers that we are not accusing

unfounded, let's see an example from a journal entitled matter

was ANCESTORS: A FAMILY ALBUM.

Maybe for some [...], there are signs [...], maybe [...], may have

occurred [...], it was believed [...], do not know if he [...],... this suggests [...],

may have been able [...], must have [...], may probably [...], may be also

likely it is believed [...], it is also believed likely possibly also likely [...], is

considered now believed [...], it was considered [...], scholars think that [...],

it may have been [...], most likely [...], must have [...], probably there is no

evidence [...], it is believed may have been [...], indicates that [...], it is

possible that [...], probably [...], is likely [...], another evidence suggests [...],

apparently were left [...], a great controversy [...], apparently [...], suggest that

were not [...], entirely understood, opens the door for new assumptions ... we

know almost nothing [...], there is no certainty about [...], evidence suggests

[...], remains uncertain [...], maybe they are [...], apparently [...].

(ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 44 to 51).


[ 11 ]

Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste (France, 1744-1829) This man

was wrong, but in the nineteenth-century science class said that

he was right.

I - THE PURPOSE OF BIOLOGY

Biology is divided into three classes:

A Zoology.

B Botany.

C - General Biology.

In turn, the General Biology is divided into five groups:

1 - BIOESTATICS SCIENCES

Studies living beings from the angle of a physical

structure. Are parts of these sciences:


[ 12 ]

A - Anatomy - studies the structure of living things.

B - Histology - studies the tissues of living organisms.

C - Cytology - studies the cells of living beings.

D - Morphology - studies the forms of living beings.

2 BIODYNAMICS SCIENCES

Science represented by physiology:

A - Physiology - studies the activities and functions of

the body.

3 - BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES

Studies the interaction of chemistry in living things.

Subdivided into two sciences:

A - Stoichiometry - Analyzes chemical compositions in

living things.

B - Biodynamics - Analyzes chemical changes in living

things.

4 - SCIENCES BIOGENIC

Studying the origins of life on three aspects:


[ 13 ]

A - Ontogeny - studies the evolution of the living from

egg to the full development.

B - Genetics - studies the heredity.

C - Phylogeny - Study the history of living beings.

5 - SCIENCES BIOTAXICS

It is divided into three sciences:

A - Taxonomy - these scientific names of beings.

B - Biogeography - Study the factors that determine the

distribution of organisms on the planet.

C - Systematic - studies the groups of species.

There are also complementary sciences of biology that

are:

A - Paleontology - study the fossils that testify to the

traces of life millennia.

B - Ecology - studies the relationship among living

beings.


[ 14 ]

Simian skulls extinct, of men of different races, and the pieces of

refurbished skulls do not prove that men evolved from primates.

"The evolutionary process is blind" (Leakey) picture

above, Johanson with the skeleton of Lucy. Evolutionists follow

a blind, and as Jesus said, "Both will fall into a pit" (Matthew

15:14).

II - ANATOMY


[ 15 ]

1 - COMPARATIVE ANATOMY

Evolutionists to defend the theory of evolution invoke

the "organ connecting principle, that is, the relative position of

a organ in relation to other organs is always the same; this idea

is also called COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, whose author was

Saint-Hilaire.

Based on this hypothesis is that it claims to be the

monkey the closest relative of the man, as they have many

physical similarities with humans. However, we think it is going

too far, coming streaks of mythological to say that the apparent

anatomical similarity equivalent to proof of evolution, because

this argument is used by teachers and biologists who often, are

mere automatons, only know how to repeat what you learned in

school or university, but are unable to think freely, putting

proves the theory of evolution.

What can be proven with the appearance of similar

bodies? That human and other animals have evolved from each

other? And the amazing thing, to say that evolution from one

species to another was all by chance? This is how to explain

these machines called perfect life? Can give credit to Charles

Darwin, who did not even know of the existence of DNA and

did not even know the high complexity that exists in a single

cell?


[ 16 ]

The wings and the feet of birds, members of the human

body, the feet of the frogs, the flippers of seals and whales, the

legs and the wings of ducks, the hoofs of quadrupeds, what does

this have to do with evolution?

A wooden shack, a block house, a mansion filled with

aluminum and smoked glass, a building, or the Burj Khalifa in

Dubai Tower with its 828 meters tall, it could be argued that one

evolved from the other? There have been designed and built

according to the will of its creators? Matters of coincidence?

And look at these buildings are little comparisons near the

complexity of a living organism with its millions of

interconnected cells... Would it not have God the right and the

power to create living beings as well you pleased?

SATIRE REAL ESTATE EVOLUTION

"There are billion years was only wood and rafter ..."


[ 17 ]

"The accumulation of dust, there are 200 million years old,

formed walls ..."

"Frequent floods shaped homepithecus there are 50 million years

ago."

"The emergence of the glass in the holes marked the beginning of

'homehabilis' there is a million years ago."


[ 18 ]

"The homeerectus 500 thousand years ago already

had ornate columns."

"There are 200,000 years ago, new staircases and floors

jumped in real estate development."


[ 19 ]

"There are 20,000 years ago came the buildings-

magnon already with social and service elevator."

The fact that a house be similar to other types of

constructions mentioned here, justifies believe in the

spontaneous evolution of building materials? The similarity of

the houses have in common like foundations, doorways,

windows, and ceilings, justify the belief that a wooden shack

after millions of years has become a luxury building? More

absurd still believe that grain inorganic materials over millions

of years, without a higher power without intelligence to lead it

managed to produce the perfect of machines of the universe:

The human being. There will be no white dresses men with an

enviable resume that will make me believe most fairy tale I've

ever met: The Theory of Evolution.

Darwin's caricature published in the journal The Hornet on 22

March 1871. Darwin was the greatest bluffer history, it applies the phrase of

George Burns, "Sincerity is everything if you get it defrauds you're done."


[ 20 ]

2 - MENTAL CAPACITY

The anatomical structure of the brain and skull

measures are not as important, as the size of the head worth

something the elephant and the whale would be smarter. But is

the incomparable intelligence of man that separates it from all

other living beings preventing any comparison of all animals to

man.

In "Life" magazine was published a statement of the

superiority of the human brain:

Brain neurons make thousands of links among them. But the extra

innumerable provided by the human cortex multiply almost to infinity the

brain's ability to observe and analyze data. And it is this absolute power to

cope with massive data sets on man an incomparably superior to any other

living thing class. (LIFE, June 28, 1963)

Still comparing the abysmal difference between men to

primates, Dr. Dobzhansky says the following:

"Chimpanzees are many superior to other non-human primates, in

memory, imagination and ability to learn. However, there is a vast gulf

between the intellectual capacity of chimpanzees and man. Symbolic

reactions can be learned by chimpanzees only with great difficulty, and their

frequency does not increase with experience and age." (THE BIOLOGICAL

BASE OF HUMAN FREEDOM, p 102).

Directors of the Jehovahs Witness Association made

an interesting observation about this comparison between man

and animals:


[ 21 ]

"Yes, there is an unbridgeable gulf between man and animal. If

evolution were true, there would be no such gap. There would be

intermediate stages of intelligence, but these are not found anywhere.

Evolutionists claim that these stages were men 'prehistoric' that are now

extinct. But why would persist lower animals such as monkeys, while all men

'prehistoric', supposedly superior, disappeared? There were such men

'prehistoric' really?" (MAN DID GET HERE BY EVOLUTION OR BY

CREATION? p 77 in the portuguese version)

3 - HAND ANATOMY

Fossilized bones of Australopithecus Robustus hand,

dated 1.8 million years generated a controversy to the Theory of

Evolution. According to the professor at the University of New

York, Randall Susman, the fingers of this creature has a similar

configuration to the modern man and flexibility to handle stones

and bones, turning them into tools. Such an explanation placed

in doubt elsewhere in the theory of evolution: is that if the

"Robustus" could produce tools, then they should have survived

as the "homo". Because one disappeared, and another survived,

is another mystery. To say that "Robustus" fed up of vegetables

and the "homo" survived because besides vegetables also fed

meat is a poor argument.

The big difference from man to animals is not anatomical, but

spiritual and intellectual. The man has a spirit, animals do not. Man has a


[ 22 ]

psyche (soul) that gives the ability to have self-consciousness, to know the

universe and the existence of God, but the animals do not have is awareness.

4 - SKULL

Like the modern man's skull with skulls of prehistoric

men prove nothing for evolution. The more similar skulls of said

'prehistoric' are human races that were extinguished and the

differences can be explained by variations that can exist within

the same species. Examples of these variations are found until

today where there are small human as the pygmies and dwarves

reaching just over a meter high, to the Germanic type and some

African groups that often are the two meters high. The skulls of

Australopithecus are more extinct primate species than man's

evolutionary relatives.

Let's wake up to the truth, the Australopithecus were primates like

monkeys, were never evolutionary link of man, they became extinct and their

skulls remaining, attest that they were more like chimpanzees than for men.


[ 23 ]

"The skull similar to ours is not the man evolution of the link.

Neanderthal man is more extinct human race than link of evolution. "

5 - SPINAL COLUMN ANATOMY

In fact, the 'believers' in the evolution resort to any

arguments to convince people and themselves on the belief in

evolution, for example, the brazilian magazine SEE published

this cavernous explanation of back pain. Carefully read and

meditate on the monkey and the tiger legend. It's almost a shame

this little story, but people are more willing to believe this lie

than the legitimacy of the creation.

The back pain it is much older than imaginable. It began in Africa

for at least 10 million years. At that time, pressed by the scarcity of food in

the forests, Ramapithecus flocks, the original primate evolutionary line

leading to man, left to jump from branch to branch, and ventured timidly by

savannahs. The recognition of new ground was painful for tribe members. No

branches or vines to cling, they crept awkwardly in the bushes, on four legs.

The first nagging back pain crisis, a fable grateful to doctors, was one of

those raids. A Ramapithecus threatened by a ferocious tiger, grabbed a

stone with the front legs. In a sudden movement, rose on its hind legs and

flung against the predator. The stone hit the target, but the victory came at

a high price. The unprecedented effort to stay upright made the poor animal

go through a violent pain. The ancestor of man was the first effort to stand


[ 24 ]

- and invented back problems and back pain. Evils that come for millennia

the evolution of the human species. Since then, as a biological original sin,

the curse Ramapithecus divides humanity into two types of people: those

who have back problems and those who will still have. (Magazine 'SEE',

author: Aroldo Campos, 02.10.1988, page 48)

Staying creating absurd assumptions, without any

scientific proof, throwing everything into a far time is ugly ...

First we must understand that our bodies are designed to work

well within the limits of physics. Second, with the 'regression',

and not with evolution, came to the degeneration of the human

species, we were created to live forever, but with the fall of

mankind, we now have a nature similar to that of animals. So

our bodies deteriorate over time until we come to die. Specific

problems can cause back pain and disease in the general body.

When humanity began to consume too much sugar, we now

have major problems of caries in the teeth. The colonizers of

Brazil, Portuguese and Europeans had many caries, while the

native Indians of Brazil had no problems so far, this was related

to the habit of eating too much sugar. With the development of

toothpastes containing fluoride, decreased the caries problem

worldwide. Similarly modern habits of work and be sitting most

of the day, or at the office or sitting on the couch in seats that

damage the column, did increase the incidence of back

problems. Today the factories put up for sale ergonomic chairs

that best fit the column, more comfortable car seats for the

column, in addition, doctors have recommended exercises like

swimming and walking to strengthen the muscles around the

spine. These back problems are isolated and can be minimized


[ 25 ]

with the right attitudes. Even the famous doctor Drauzio Varella

in a series of Brazilian TV narrated a legend like this monkey

and tiger to show the origins of back pain. We should pay

attention to the fact that organic degeneration is a natural

process as a consequence of sin and disobedience (Romans

5:12).

5 - THE PREHISTORIC MAN

The shape of the prehistoric man is a major scientific

fraud and the worst, the helpless students of primary and

secondary schools are poisoned with belief in evolution as if it

were indisputable historical fact, but it is not all scientists think.

Indeed, Boyce Rensberger writing in Science Digest

agree that imagination, not evidence, was what shaped

prehistoric men. Boyce calls this morphological reconstitution

of Divination. Did you just acetic for the things of God, or you

also test the falsely called SCIENCE? (I Timothy 6:20).

THE ANTROPOART

The nearest idea that we can form the ancestors comes from

paintings and sculptures created by artists working with anthropologists.

Unfortunately, most of these works is based more on imagination than

on evidence. But there are also artists with natural knowledge, able to

recompose a hominid from a fossil bone. For that, you need to understand

enough of anatomy. Many of these bones have small grooves and brands,

each of which corresponds to the link with a particular muscle. Examining

the marks, the artist can estimate the original size of hominid musculature.


[ 26 ]

Following the indications of the bones, are produced replicas in

clay than would be the muscles, apply on the replicas, a plastic copy of the

bones; also with clay, empty, understood to have been fat-fulfill; Finally, if

all-covering with a final layer of clay, which is the skin.

Yet most of these reconstructions are only guessing exercises. The

bones, after all, cannot reveal the fleshy parts of the nose, lips, and ears.

Finally, the artists know they have to create between man and monkey. The

older is considered the specimen in reconstruction, more apelike will be the

way that will give you.

The guessing exercise often leads to misunderstandings. The

recent discovery of hominid footprints preserved showed how some artists err

in attributing to Neanderthals toes huge and divergent, similar to those of

monkeys. The footprints revealed that, millions of years before the

Neanderthals, foot hominid, was already thoroughly modern.

(ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 49)

III - HISTOLOGY

Apparently in the theory of evolution is an attack

against the Creator, invented purely to dismiss the truth of

creation and establish through propaganda the lies and the myth.

Histology is a serious branch of biology whose task is to

examine the tissues of animals, so, no skin tissue, histology

cannot testify for evolution. But then what we see in the Natural

History Museum, and the history books? Ivan Lissner says:


[ 27 ]

Hence the incredible stupidity of all attempts to reconstruct the

Neanderthal man, or even of Beijing. (MAN, GOD AND MAGIC - New

York, 1961, page 304)

Not even once been seen by any scientist a piece of

prehistoric man's skin, but then where do these conceptions of

caveman with skin covered with hair?

The vast majority of artistic conceptions is based more on

imagination than on evidence [...] The artists need to create something

between ape and human; the older is said to be the specimen; the more

apelike make it. (SCIENCE DIGEST, April 1981, page 41).

ART OR SCIENCE?

Figures Zinjanthropus below, show how it is

impossible to reconstruct hair, eyes, nose, lips and facial

expression as having pieces basic bones. However, the media

propagates the theory of evolution concept as the purest science.

Who does not agree with the theory of evolution is taxed to

illiterate and superstitious person.


[ 28 ]

Zinjanthropus as designed and published in the magazine

"National Geographic" in 1960.

Zinjanthropus, produced by Maurice Wilson at the request of Dr.

Kennedy P. Oakley.


[ 29 ]

Zinjanthropus whose design was published on April 5, 1964 by the

magazine "Sunday Times."

The Zinjanthropus designed by Neave Parker to Dr. LSB Leakey.

Copyright, The Illustrated London News & Sketch, Ltd., 09/01/60.

1 - SKIN

The histology study the tissues of living beings and

what was found so far is antagonistic to Evolution. Which leaves

us angry, however, is the unbiblical belief of evolution, and the

worst, receiving the endorsement of scientists without, however,

satisfy the requirements needed to be certified as true.

As our readers can see, the Ramapithecus and

Australopithecus and even 'homos' appearing in prints, show

such 'prehistoric men' with hairy leather covering the entire

body. However, there is no way to prove that the skin covering

the few bones findings were hairy. So Gordon Childe said:


[ 30 ]

Man has not, and probably never had a hairy leather. (A

CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF MAN, Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, p 32)

The man was never as hairy monkey, were also men like us who

painted the caves.

IV - CYTOLOGY

1 - CHROMOSOMES

Chromosomes are elements that make up the nucleus of

cells, having an important role in heredity, for in them are

contained in the GENES. The spiral part of GENES is called

chromonema whose number varies according to the tissue, the

stage of reproduction and according to species, of which the

number of chromosomes is FIXED IN EVERY KIND, for

example, we have:

SPECIES - NUMBER OF CHROMOSOMES


[ 31 ]

Man 46

monkey 48

Coffee 44

Fly drosophila 08

Darwin was unaware of the complexity of cells and did not even

know what it was DNA.

As we can see the existence and function of

chromosomes are more adjusted to the idea of creation than with

the idea of evolution, each species has its amount of

chromosomes and this establishes a cellular difference from one

species to another who testifies in favour of that the Bible says

in Genesis 1:11, 12, 21, 24 and 25 "Produce each according to

its kind." Many evolutionists cite the number of chromosomes

monkey is near the number of men, but that does not certify


[ 32 ]

anything since coffee also has number of chromosomes to the

next man.

The process that causes a cell to turn into a human body

is mysterious:

"I fear that biologists have to confess that does not have hardly any

idea about how this is done. Surely it must involve something more than

merely chemical processes. "(THE NATURE OF LIFE, 1962, page 67)

The process of developing a cell in a full body

suggests an intelligent highly complex program, never by

chance:

The whole process looks very much to the development of an

organized structure, starting from a relatively simple system. The protein

molecules and fat in the yolk appear to be placed in position to form an

orderly and highly complex system, somewhat similar to the process by

which a house is built of brick, wood, and glass, according to a

predetermined plan [...] The machine seems to work, in other words, a

highly intentional, and has applied to it the term 'organizer' [....]. There seems

to be a guiding principle in operation. (SCIENCE TODAY, page 25, 26)

2 - NUMBERS AND DIMENSIONS OF CELLS

In 1665 the scientist Robert Hooke discovered cell (this

word means 'voids'), later, it was discovered that all living

beings, animals or plants are formed by cells, only certain

creatures have a cell as is the case of amoebae, mushrooms, and

certain bacteria. There are also multicellular beings who are

most in the world. Man is comprised of more than one


[ 33 ]

quadrillion cells. Although we can say with some differences in

the dimensions of the cells are astounding, for example, a

human ovum is microscopic, having only 0,200mm (200

microns), while the chicken egg is a single cell!

CELL REPRODUCTION: exorbitant differences in how these

species, leads us to accept the creation or evolution as a fact?

GOD, THE LIFE ARCHITECT: The DNA is similar to a magnetic

tape containing detailed architectural plans. No doubt, a more intelligent

mind that human invented the DNA.

3 - DATABASE CELL

Evolutionists cannot prove that a cell has evolved, as

this particle, although microscopic, has amazing information,


[ 34 ]

able to build the anatomy of all living beings. I wonder who did

the most complex database program of the universe?

CELL is like a city that keeps in a library, a large

encyclopedia of 46 volumes: The 23 pairs of chromosomes.

The CHROMOSOME is like a book with thousands of

pages where all the genetic information of the human body.

The GENE and as a section on how to synthesize

proteins (skin color, for example, is a result of the presence or

absence of melanin).

The TRIPLET is like a word that specifies an amino

acid or stop a chemical reaction or the beginning of another

process.

The NUCLEOTIDE is like a letter that describes

everything that is alive.

4 BACTERIAL FLAGELLUM

Engines arise not alone...

Several scientists show the reasons that made him

abandon the theory of evolution in the way of Darwin. New

scientific discoveries in biochemistry, especially considering the

amino acids and their functions in the body, and the study of the

bacterial flagellum, should instigate and persuade scholars to


[ 35 ]

consider the argument that the complexity of life agents, can

only be explained by an intelligent creator, fate could not have

created these extremely complex systems of life. Darwin did not

have access to this information under the microscope. Today,

many scientists embrace the concept of intelligent design, this

means: There was an intelligent creator who designed life.

The publication the Evolution Controversy says: "The bacterial

flagellum has a rotor motor that rotates at a speed of 6000 to 17,000 rpm.

Even more surprising is that it can change direction with just a quarter turn

and then turn the 17,000 rpm in the other direction "New Scientist magazine

calls the bacterial flagellum of" excellent example of complicated molecular

system - one complex nanomachine is beyond the skill of any human

engineer. "

According to biochemist Michael Behe, the bacterial flagellum is

also an irreducibly complex system. This means that this system will only be

able to perform its basic function if all parts are present and working

interactively. As we remove any of its parts, it ceases to perform its basic

function [].

Behe likes to use the example of the trap. The trap is a mechanism

designed to catch rats. This mechanism consists of a few parts that work

interactively. The joint work of these parts causes the trap to work and

perform its function. If any of these parts are missing, the trap will not work.

Therefore, it is essential that all parts are present for the mousetrap to work.

Thus, the bacterial flagellum is a mechanism that cannot have

evolved. According the evolution, the flagellar motor was forming gradually.

Their working parties would have emerged gradually. As the flagellar motor

only works if it is complete, the lack of any of its parts become useless or

inoperative system. As a useless structure could be preserved by natural

selection? Evolutionists try to answer this question claiming that the


[ 36 ]

incomplete flagellar motor could have had other uses. For this resort to Co-

Option:

The Intelligent Design critics generally resort to the theory of co-

option in an attempt to "prove" that the flagellar motor is derived from

natural and random processes. But there is a flaw in this theory: According to

Co-Option, the bacterial flagellum was formed with other parts of the oldest

molecular machines. We know that the bacterial flagellum is formed by 40

structural parts. Ten of these parts were found in another molecular machine

(a bacterium that has a kind of syringe instead of flagellum). However, the

other 30 shares are unique (only exist in the bacterial flagellum). If the

argument is that natural selection used parts of other molecular machines that

existed before the flagellum, where she got these 30 unique parts?

(http://guerrovacriacionismo.spaceblog.com.br/1802247/Motores-Nao-

Surgem-Sozinhos-Flagelo-Bacteriano/)

V - PHYSIOLOGY

1 - MACHINE VOCAL

One of the most difficult points of evolutionists

explains is the language used by man and animals are far from

resembling. According to the theory of evolution, shrews (a type

of mouse) changing their habitat, were living in the forests, up in

the trees, and eventually, became chimpanzees and gorillas and

continued eating plant foods. Those who were for the savannah,

began to eat with effort, because the foods were dispersed, and


[ 37 ]

this, according to the theory of evolution, has eased the

development of intelligence, and the fact that walking upright,

would have changed the physiology of the vocal tract. However,

even if we considered these mere assumptions as facts, there are

problems insoluble for the argument of evolution, as published

in the magazine Superinteressante in one of his articles about

evolution:

If that explains how did the unit capable of emitting around 50

basic sounds [...]. does not explain why humans began to use it to

communicate with one another. In addition, it is unknown when the vocal

tract began to be used to produce language. (SUPERINTERESSANTE)

After several studies with chimpanzees, especially with

the monkey Washoe, scientists reached the following

conclusions:

Chimpanzees are able to associate symbols to objects, but not true

sentences make much less to express ideas. While a child can learn any

language has spoken around her, chimpanzees are not able even to utter the

most rudimentary forms of human languages. In fact, there are many cases of

children who speak several languages. One of those, with only five years,

spoke eight languages fluently. Commenting on the vocal tract and the ability

to communicate, a scholar ended: Remains the most inexplicable aspect of

evolution. (THE BRAIN: THE LAST FRONTIER, p 59, 69)

Taking into account the physiological and linguistic

aspects of the language of men, the magazine Science News

Letter published the following news:

States Dr. Mason, an expert on American languages: The idea that

the 'wild' speak in a series of grunts and cannot express many concepts


[ 38 ]

'civilized' is completely wrong [...]. The evolution of language, found Dr.

Manson, is extremely otherwise of biological evolution. Language evolved

towards the complex to the simple. (SCIENCE NEWSLETTER, 03/09/1955)

This statement of Dr. Mason fits more with the creation

and degeneration of the languages of the Theory of Evolution.

The monkey Washoe learned 150 meanings of the language of the

deaf and dumb, but unlike men, the monkey cannot express ideas, man is

different, because it was created with the breath of God, the spirit, which

gives man incomparable attributes.

Human organs are many well defined and highly

complex or they have already been created with these

mechanisms, or for millions of years were deformed and useless

organs. For example, one eye is comprised of many intricate

parts, missing them or without being fully formed; the vision is

useless to see. So is unimaginable bodies in a slow evolution

(thousands or millions of years) until they are ready.


[ 39 ]

EAR is a perfect machine than a recorder. The recorder

has evolved, or was created by an intelligent mind?

EYE is a perfect machine than any camera or

camcorder. These machines have evolved by themselves or were

created by an intelligent mind?


[ 40 ]

UTERUS is a perfect machine than any industrial

machine, machines emerged spontaneously or were designed by

an intelligent mind?

Vocal tract is a perfect machine than any sound system

invented by man, so the logic forces me to accept that life and

man are on the planet because they were created and not because

they evolved in a disorderly manner and without purpose.


[ 41 ]

Human organs are properly set in a perfect organization

so that all functions as a supermachine. Cars are infinitely

simpler. Do you believe that there is any car that evolved alone,

out of nowhere, by chance, without intelligent intervention?

SMELL is such a complex device that recently only,

men were able to imitate the Creator and invented the chemical

smell sensor. But it is a ridiculous device close to what God has

done. Our nose has 20 million sensory cells. Is good for you? Or

think little? Well, God made a pet (dog) which has about 100

million sensory cells connected to the central nervous system. Is

good for you? Do you think all this wiring is by chance?


[ 42 ]

HEART is perfect than any engine. It works until the

last day of our lives, is an extremely strong muscle, his strength

pumps blood around the body. Every day your heart must beat

more than 100,000 times to pump 1800 liters of blood for more

than 60,000 miles of blood vessels. Do you know any engine as

perfect as the heart? Automotive and industrial engines are

simple near the heart. Then the heart appeared slow and gradual

chemical reaction to perfect and is up and running? As the

animals lived while the heart was evolving? Will the engines of

Mercedes and Ferrari emerged chaos, out of nowhere, without

any engineer put your hand?


[ 43 ]

RESPIRATORY SYSTEM human is perfect than

carburetor and automotive electronic injection. But the

evolutionist cannot realize that the more complex a machine,

more intelligent was their creator. So I would attribute to chance

the appearance of the respiratory system and the carburetor I

assign as the work of an intelligent mind? We need to stop being

induced pseudo-intellectuals who want to 'rape' our brain,

forcing us to believe in a theory that attacks the reason and

common sense. If you are an atheist, it's your problem! But use

logical reasoning and not by robotic evolutionary propaganda

that plague the media and the contemporary educational system.

VI - STOICHIOMETRY

In biology, there is the branch of stoichiometry

studying the chemicals in living things. Chemists have extensive

knowledge of these substances and are not surprising that they

can create drugs that help a weakened life, but if life could

EVOLVE chemical material, today we would have human being


[ 44 ]

produced in laboratories simply mixing chemicals and not in the

womb of woman as it has been from the beginning. If the theory

of evolution was scientifically proven, chemists and biologists

should create a living being water-based, minerals,

carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and enzymes. But they cannot

and will. Genetic manipulation, artificial insemination or in

vitro fertilization are not even close to what can be defined as

creating life in the laboratory from inanimate material or

substance as preach evolutionists, it never happened. Therefore,

astronomer Robert Jastrow said:

To the chagrin of them, scientists do not have need of an answer,

because chemists have never had success in reproducing the experience of

nature on the creation of life from inanimate matter. Scientists do not know

how it happened. (THE ENCHANTED LOOM: MIND IN THE UNIVERSE,

New York, 1981, p 18)

The Creator (God) designed the sperm as drivers of

animal life at fertilization and mating process.

1 - DNA


[ 45 ]

The deoxyribonucleic acid is the substance responsible

for the construction of all cells of living beings. Some writers

call the DNA of microscopic computer. Here are some concepts

that divine wonder:

The deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an organic compound whose

molecules contain the genetic instructions that coordinate the development

and functioning of all living organisms and some viruses, and bringing the

hereditary characteristics of each living being. Its main role is to store the

necessary information for the construction of proteins and RNAs. DNA

segments that contain the genetic information are called genes. The rest of

the DNA sequence has structural significance or is involved in regulating the

use of genetic information. (WIKIPEDIA, accessed 31/12/2014)

Your personal DNA finds itself splashed across his body in about

60 trillion dots - the average number of living cells in the adult human [...].

Surprisingly, the DNA molecule has a basically simple. It consists of two

interlaced aspire, like the tape queued atoms connected together at regular

intervals by crosspieces - like a spiral staircase [...]. There is a long slender

logic in the form of DNA; give you the ability similar to magnetic tape

recording, storing the huge amount of information needed for life. Even the

strands of DNA are sugar and phosphate; stair sleepers snail are composed

of nitrogen, His varied in sequence strands of DNA directs the events that

cause the body to grow - very similar to the way the tiny changes in magnetic

tape producing, according to their order, the sounds of music [...]. Dr. Beadle

says that if the instructions encoded in the DNA of a single human cell

were translated into English, would fill an encyclopedia of 1,000

volumes.

While the DNA within the nucleus is giving orders that stimulate

growth, digestion, heartbeat, thought and feeling. Follows its own intrinsic

plan that has brought you through the corridors of time. It makes no changes

to this plan, unless they imposed on it by radiation accidents or from outside

the cell. (READER DIGEST, October and 1962: 144 and 148)


[ 46 ]

The conclusion by the statement that DNA does not

allow the organism to develop outside the pre-established

pattern, radiation coming from outside the cell could not make

any changes that were not harmful.

If the code is truly universal [...], is not subject to mutation.

(Scientific American, October 1963).

DNA is the principal agent of the fabrication of living

beings and is the time it reaches the sperm nucleus of the egg

that is provided by the combinations cells of man and woman. In

the Bible, the book of Psalms 139.14-16 there is a reference to

the DNA of the mechanism:

I praise you because fearfully and wonderfully made, marvelous

are thy works, and my soul knoweth right well. My frame was not hidden,

when I was made in secret, and woven together in the depths of the earth.

Your eyes saw my unformed body, and in thy book all my members were

written, which in continuance were formed day to day, when as yet there

was none of them.

In the magazine "LIFE" was published an article

showing the greatness of DNA, which has only one explanation

for this micro engineer - GOD.

The egg fertilized contains in its tiny core not only all the genetic

instructions for the development of a human body, but also protective

equipment - Amino Acid, umbilical cord, placenta and all that makes

possible the existence of the embryo in the womb. (LIFE, 30.04.1965).

Note well that inanimate matter cannot reproducer

inanimate matter, much less produce animate matter. The fact of


[ 47 ]

inanimate matter contain enzymes and proteins, which in turn

are essential substances to living beings, not scientifically

justified belief in evolution. The theory of evolution cannot

explain how life arose without having to disregard these

biological laws. We, creationists, agreed to gender, number and

degree to the REAL science, as if life comes from life, as taught

Pasteur, then we are right to say that God is the Creator of all

living things. As for the origin of God, that is no problem for us

to explain, for God, according to the Bible, is so powerful that it

exists for all eternity, and to understand the existence of God,

just we use the MATH explanation of negative numbers that

have not end. Likewise, God is the Lord of mathematics and

superior to it, has no beginning or end (negative and positive

numbers are infinite, as the past and the future of God). We

conclude that the only scientific and philosophical explanation

for the existence of life is God. So the Bible calls Jesus THE

LIFE AUTHOR (Acts 3:15).


[ 48 ]

As the science is revealing the mysteries of the human body and its

high complexity, the more it becomes clear that this is not by chance. Only a

mind, a trillion times higher ours could have created the energy, matter and

living beings. God, the Lord of Life.

CELL CONTROL

Cancer is the abnormal growth of a cell that can

generate a tumor. Daily, DNA does trace the cell to detect

anomalies, exercising, a cell control to prevent the degeneration

of the cell.

All our cells have mechanisms to prevent neoplastic

transformation. These mechanisms are known as control systems can be

divided into: mechanical, chemical and genetic systems. One the concepts

that most people are unaware of is that when we have a proliferation of

neoplastic cells, many of them are destroyed by these control systems, clearly

for some reason, for the other remaining cancer cells, these same systems not

work, but we would not have the cancer, right? A very efficient mechanical


[ 49 ]

system is called contact inhibition. When cells in a tissue that is repairing, for

example, know the time to stop dividing not to go beyond the ordinary? The

answer is in touch! When cells that are dividing abut immediately stop their

division. (UNIMES, Degree in Biology from the Metropolitan University of

Santos, 2012)

I understand that these control systems that destroy the

cancer cells are systems created by God so that life could

develop. It is not by chance and by accident that determined

these rules in the DNA. God made it the program that makes the

cells rotate this program and implement what is already

determined by Him.

VII - BIODYNAMICS

Biodynamic studies the chemical changes in living

things. Today we know how much is sophisticated living

organism and as a species evolved into another is extremely

difficult to explain and even worse, try. Given this recent

discovery, Loren Eiseley said:

Intensified effort revealed that the very amoeba, supposedly

simple, was a complex plant, a chemical plant of auto operation. The concept

that was just a simple bubble, whose chemical composition, once discovered,

will allow us to start instantly up the viral process, have proved at best,

monstrous caricatures of truth. With the failure of these efforts, the science

was in the embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of origins of

life that she could not demonstrate. After censor theologian, for your

confidence on myth and miracle, science found itself in the position that had


[ 50 ]

the nothing enviable, of having to create their mythology. (A HUGE DAY, p

164)

1 - COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY

No serious scientist should consider the biochemical

argument compared as quoted below:

Fish eliminate ammonia, amphibians eliminate urea, and reptiles

eliminate uric acid. Since an avian embryo initially removes ammonia, urea

later, and finally, uric acid; is a repetition of phylogenetic nitrogen

metabolism. (CERED, Goal collection, p 72)

Evolutionists seek create outlandish theories about

evidence of such a development. An example is the analogy

cited above. But think of a fable about the evolutionary origin of

the car. Imagine that someone claimed that the car made of sheet

metal was not built in the metallurgical, or the sheet made in

steel, but that the following explanation: "There were several

metal bedpans, where almost all the natural selection eventually

succumbed not survive oxidation, but some managed to adapt

and become in wheelbarrows, the evolutionary process followed

for a long time, some links that prove this evolution is the 'stove-

erectus', and later, as measuring 1.70 meter the refrigerator cro-

magnon and finally the auto-sapiens was the crowning of

evolution."

If you think this absurd explanation, I also think!


[ 51 ]

2 - FEATURE OF LIVING

Studying biodynamic we are led to consider all the

differences among living things and inanimate materials. Such

differences are so great that any intelligent person will wonder:

How life can come from inanimate matter? And that continues

with no evolution of ore to organic life? Let's look at the

differences among the ore and the life:

A - CHEMICAL COMPOSITION

The ore is usually comprised of an element (iron, gold,

silver), while no living element, even microscopic cell, it

consists of various elements such as carbon, hydrogen, iron,

oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, potassium and

magnesium. In addition, living organisms synthesize organic

substances and, hence, are constantly changing their chemical

composition, as the minerals, their compositions are fixed.

B - CELL ORGANIZATION

The cellular structure that makes up living things

distinguishes them from minerals. The multicellular beings still

behave as a unit because the mechanism of self-regulation

establishing cooperation among all parties. The inanimate matter

does not have these mechanisms.

C - METABOLISM


[ 52 ]

The minerals do not have the metabolic capacity which

is the process to obtain food (assimilation), and the process of

releasing this chemical energy activities and removing products

that are expelled (dissimilation). These are the characteristics of

living things that distinguishes it from inanimate materials.

D - REPRODUCTION

Minerals do not reproduce, unlike the living beings that

the natural processes produce a being like him.

E - GROWTH

Living beings can regenerate parts destroyed; in large

animals this process is called healing. Inanimate materials are

destroyed by erosion and have no ability to restore itself.

F - CYCLE VITAL

All living things have a life cycle that is born, grows,

reproduces, ages and dies.

G - STIMULUS

All living matter reacts to external variations, for

example: If you play water in the cat he runs, but the minerals

do not react to any external variation.

H - ADAPTATION


[ 53 ]

Living beings react internally adapting to the

environment, inanimate matter does not react chemically

looking to adapt to the environment.

ABSTRACT

Many biology textbooks bring this explanation of living

beings. However, despite these insurmountable differences

between living beings and inanimate, the theory of evolution

insists that life arose from inanimate matter, making an attack on

biology.

VIII - ONTOGENY

There is a principle in the biogenesis that says. "Life

comes from life" All the research done so far in all branches of

biology support this statement. The hen lays an egg and the egg

to go way the growing chick, becomes a chicken, and this is the

process of birth, growth and reproduction is repeated

indefinitely, no sparrow or ostrich out of the hen's egg, let alone

an inanimate matter.

1 - EMBRYOLOGY


[ 54 ]

Embryology is branch of ontogeny and as its name

says, studying the embryo. Evolutionists use the argument of

embryology compared to prove the theory of evolution.

Animals of different species, when in the embryonic stage, are

very similar [...]. The explanation is that we descended from animals where

such bodies were functional. (GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, Cered, p 72).

The development of embryos shows that each takes the form

according to its kind. The embryology compared supports the creation or

evolution? When an architect begins to outline a project, it starts with simple

lines until a succession of traces, leads to the development of specific

projects. So God created life, the first divine trait is the first embryonic stage,

after the divine computer program (DNA) will designing specific lines going

shaping life forms according to its kind.

Wanting to prove the theory of evolution because the

embryos are similar is a weak argument that supposedly can

only be a joke, but in the classroom, students and teachers have

to accept the doctrine of the school curriculum with the same


[ 55 ]

degree of belief that any religious, so it is said that: "More

important to get knowledge, you have the ability to reason and

draw conclusions."

Nothing in nature is by chance, see how the Great Scientist

designed the egg.

IX - GENETIC

Genetics is the part of biology that studies heredity,

whose biological mechanism transmits the characteristics of the

fathers to the children.

1 - THE INHERITANCE

Heredity is controlled by several independent genes.

Was Daven-Port which ranked the two pairs of genes that

determine the inheritance. The genes A and B increase the

intensity of pigmentation, the pairs of genes taxpayers,

represented by capital letters, and non-taxpayers symbolized by

lowercase letters


[ 56 ]

Genes work with scope for variation within species, not

progressing to other species. The way passes the genetic heritage reveals the

organization of biological elements and this makes us suppose that someone

created this system. Genes are created programs, it is not the work of

evolutionary chance.

2 - HYBRIDIZATION

The hybrid is one of the greatest proofs that God

established genetic boundaries between species preventing

animals from different species cross, and when cross not

reproduce. But, also, among those who reproduce, the offspring

are born dead, and among certain species, hybrids living

descendants, are not fruitful more than three generations, and

later became sterile.

The first to speak of the importance of crosses between

species for the study of heredity was the Greek Aristotle in the

third century BC. In the eighteenth century AD, Leuwenhoeck

(1632-1723), through experiments with rabbits white and gray,

discovered the gene dominance and regressive. Finally, Mendel


[ 57 ]

formulated his laws which established several points of this

science.

Let's look at four laws of hybridity:

1 - Crossing two hybrids together, in almost all cases

not reproduced. When there is reproduction, the offspring are

infertile.

2 - The hybrids can reproduce indefinitely in

phanerogams plants, higher plants and the following animals:

camel one hump with camel two humps and rabbits with hares.

3 - The hybrids are fertile, but in 3 or 4 generations at

most, between species like the dog and the jackals.

4 - The hybrid refuse the cross.

Importantly, we do not know the details of species

division as the vision of God in Genesis 1:12, 21, and 25,

however, God established the rule that each species reproduce

within their own species. The canine family with its internal

variety (dogs, wolves, jackals and foxes) do not mix with the cat

family (cats, tiger, lynx and lion). Therefore, among these, nor

considering mating and reproduction of offspring. Professor

Dobzhansky confirms what the word of God said long ago:

Never saw any individual in respect of which it could be in doubt

if it belongs to the species of cats (Felis domestica) or species of lions (Felis

leo). The two species are different because of the absence of intermediate.

Therefore, one can safely say that any cat is unlike any lion [...]. What has


[ 58 ]

just been said with respect to the species 'domestic felis' and 'felis leo',

applies also to numerous other species pairs. Are both between different

groups of animals and plants, among the simple structures as well as from the

many complexes. The formation of different groups is almost universal that

must be considered fundamental characteristics of the organic diversity.

(GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 5:06)

Mare and donkey can produce mule or donkey, but these are sterile

because reached the limit of their species.

The animals of the same genus may even cross with

different species, however, hybridity is the separation

mechanism that prevents the development of a new species

originated by interbreeding.

In the process of hybridization, crosses between two different

species of the same genus (in most cases) in order to combine the best

qualities of both [...]. The new hybrid is often stronger than any parent.


[ 59 ]

Sometimes the seed is sterile and requires constant hybridization. (

BIOLOGY FOR TODAY, p 294).

We can conclude this part of our study on the theory of

evolution, saying that science has already given its approval

with respect to Genesis 1:11 which says: Give fruit according

to its kind" The hybrid rule out the emergence of new species by

crossing as said zoologist Richard B. Goldschmidt:

Nowhere is implemented the limits of species, and these limits are

separated from the boundaries of the closest species by the impassable gap,

which also includes sterility. (THE MATERIAL BASIS OF EVOLUTION, p

168)

New hybrid species exist only in science fiction or pictures by

computer manipulation. There was no evolution of species, and at this point

there is no species in transition. All species are fully set out in the world,

there are no examples in the transitional nature.


[ 60 ]

Genetic engineering can improve certain characteristics of a

species by various processes, especially hybridization, but has never been

created in the laboratory a new species of animal or plant that can break the

sterility of that new hybrid species. The Creator has placed limits, God is the

legislator's genetic code. Pictured above is an example of a wild maize and

genetically modified maize compared to the same coin. This is not evolution

of the species, is genetic manipulation.

3 MUTATIONS

The contradictions of the Theory of Evolution are

everywhere, one of them says that the mutations were important

mechanisms for the process of evolution. Proponents

acknowledge that humanity has never seen a new species arise

under the influence of mutations.

According to the theory of evolution living beings undergo

changes, i.e., a species can change over time, some species may become

extinct and others appear. Mutations are the main factor responsible for

changes that occur in the species. It can be said that the mutation is the raw

material of evolution. The mutations are sudden changes of hereditary

characters, however the authors of biology treaties agree that never seen a

species give rise to another species. (COLLECTION PURPOSE, Cered,

Book 2, page 51)


[ 61 ]

A - LETHAL GENES

The French scientist Lucien Cunot through

experiments with mice proved those mutations when they are

not harmful, are lethal, few indeed are beneficial. Among the

lethal genes are called thalassemia, microcitemia,

phenylketonuria, epiloia, and albinism. Albinism in animals and

men is not lethal, but it is deadly in plants. Phenylketonuria,

acting on the individual, produces mental retardation and death

before reaching sexual maturity. Therefore, the mutation cannot

explain the theory of evolution, on the contrary, it serves more

to confirm the biblical doctrine of human degeneration (Genesis

6:12) and all species. Mutations are a detrimental factor to life:

Either the natural mutations or induced by artificial means such as

radiation [...]. Current evidence suggests that over 99% of mutations are

undesirable. (THE NEW ZEALAND HERALD, 1/17/65)

Professor Wallace witness saying:

Changes caused by mutations, in any gene, are rare events.

This is a different way of saying those genes ordinarily reproduce accurately.

(RADIATION, GENES AND MAN, 1959, p 35)

W. H. Dowdeswell said of the changes:

The mutants discovered in the laboratory, or all of them are

recessive, or semidominant, and most cause harmful physiological effects.

(THE MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION, p 30)


[ 62 ]

Mutants with superpowers, as the heroes Marvel (X-Men) and new

species, only exist in the world of mythology and fiction. We are fans of pure

science.

Dr. HJ Muller, Nobel Prize, attested harmful and lethal

results of changes:

Most mutations are harmful and lethal; in fact, the good are so rare

that we can consider them all harmful. (TIMES, 11/11/1946, p 96)

Most evolutionists believe that the mutation is the raw

material of evolution, but it is not what it says the renowned Dr.

Dobzhansky:

Most mutations both produced in laboratories with those stored in

natural populations, produces deterioration of viability, hereditary diseases

and monstrosities. Such changes it seems, can hardly serve as an

evolutionary building stone. (GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES,

p 73)

B - EXPERIMENTAL MUTATION

A treaty of biology so explained the experimental

mutations: These experimental mutations have been acquired

by the action of chemicals, trauma, graft, bacteria, X-ray and

ultraviolet, cosmic rays and atomic energy" Such mutations


[ 63 ]

produced, even the highly intelligent mind of man cannot get a

satisfactory result, according concluded the expert

horticulturalist, Dr. W.E. Lammer:

My own work on radiation of roses with neutrons describes a

technique by which we can induce only irradiated buttons Queen Elizabeth,

more mutations than could be found so far for a life of research from several

million non-irradiated buttons. Without exception, all induced mutations

were found defective or weaker than the Queen Elizabeth roses [...]. Hardly

could compete biologically in view of the reduced force and partial sterility.

(THE CREACIONIST).

Mutations originated from the atomic explosion in 1945

in Japan, generated deformities, atrophy and deaths. Drug use

and other chemicals by pregnant women result in irreparable

harm in the embryo, that when not dies, is born with many

health problems; even the smoke that is accepted by society

causes mutations that are always harmful. Mutations are genetic

accidents and as always all accidents, they are harmful. The

results of such experimental mutations using chemicals witness

their misdeeds to living things: chickens without feathers,

children without arms and legs, fish with one eye, insects with

different colored eyes of its kind, birds with reduced wings.

Who would argue that such mutations worked for the evolution

of species?

C - FREQUENCY OF MUTATION


[ 64 ]

The theory of evolution cannot prove its authenticity

through experiences that can be observed, therefore, is to

imagine that evolutionists would use the time as a favorable

factor to evolution. So the argument most often used to explain

the evolution is that it took thousands and millions of years. This

is impossible today, with more reason, it was impossible in

times past. Let's see what the eminent authorities say about the

frequency of changes and the probabilities of whether it results

in new species:

Mutations occur rarely. The most genes undergo changes only

once every 100,000 or more generations [...]. Researchers estimate that the

human gene can remain stable for 2.5 million years [...]. Most mutations are

harmful. Some make it impossible for the cells to develop and grow. (WORD

BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, p 809 volume XIII, p 194 volume IX)

PHYLOGENY

In this chapter, we will study the theories of the origin

of life including:

- Spontaneous Generation;

- Inheritance of acquired characters;

- Natural selection;

- Mutations.


[ 65 ]

1 - THE STORY OF LIVING

The goal of phylogeny is to study the history of living

beings, however, only man left written records of their works

and achievements in the past, and on this subject we will deal in

General History of book from our collection. In fact, there are

only animals, they do not build anything for the later generation,

and even to his generation. So Jesus said, "Behold the fowls of

the air sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns, and

yet your heavenly Father feeds them" (Matthew 6:26). No

species of animal builds a civilization, a culture, their techniques

of hunting have not evolved (carnivores in thousands of years

still hunting the same way, did not develop hunting

paraphernalia), their houses have not changed (the birds

continue to do their nests, each according to its kind). Every

living still in their own habitat (fish in the water, a tree planted

on the ground, and "each jack to his" and the worm under the

earth ...).

While the bird "Rufous-clay" continues to make its

home in the same style throughout its existence, without adding

one wants compartment one more as a toilet, a kitchen, a maid's

room, or a garden in front of your mud house. More

conservative evolutionary require more rapid action of "Rufous-

clay" because it was expected that after a few millennia, he had

already to maked a little windows. And what shall we say of

men?


[ 66 ]

- Man is the absolute master of the four cardinal points:

in glaciers, it does the igloo; in the mountains, valleys and plains

there your house, are concrete houses on the rocks or wooden

stilts over the water; in the desert, he extends his tent; in the

metropolis, he raises skyscrapers. Never before has there been

living on earth like a man, a masterpiece of God's hand, created

especially to be the ruler of the planet.

What about the means of transportation? What animal

is compared to humans? The fish still swimming generation

after generation, the birds keep flying generation after

generation; quadrupeds continue generation after generation

walking. And the man? Man walks on two legs like bipedal,

subduing the horses, which are quadrupeds, men riding on his

back. He also invented and modernized the cart has drawn by

equine strength to reduce the weight of the animal and to add

more weight of people and goods, pulled by the force of horses

and company. Recently, in the history of living things, man

invented the cars driven by motors. The man does not have the

strength of ant is able to carry objects ten times heavier than its

own weight, but it can build trains capable of carrying 10,000

times its own weight. Even without being able to rely on the

convenient pneumatic bones, not with the beautiful plumes and

feathers of birds, man can fly faster than any bird. While the

birds exceed, on average, at 80 km/h; the man with his

supersonic airplanes and space shuttles; travels faster than

sound, reaching the speed of 20,000 km/h.


[ 67 ]

What else can we say? As a last example, we will cite

the case of communications. No animal has progressed creating

a new vocabulary. In fact, most of them, nor words can issue.

Some emit sounds that are far from a complex language as the

men, most of these uses the sound only in the mating parades,

like the cat. Perhaps the most intelligent creatures regarding

communication, is the CHICKEN, she always shows a great

mood by announcing that put an egg...

Evolutionists love to play the trumpet when an animal

is bred to the circus show, trying to say that in them intelligence.

Teaching a new word to the parrot just proves how much he is

automatic and it is unable to maintain, under any circumstances,

intelligent communication as man.

Indeed biologists are presenting a great job in research

on the behavior of animals, and would not, in any way belittle

the work of these professionals. However, it is in this field that

proliferates weeds evolutionists in which phylogeny becomes

the latest attempt to create a mythological story of living

beings through the fantasy lives of prehistoric men.


[ 68 ]

"Mere assumptions were unfounded the basis of this imaginary

story."

The variety of the species did not come from evolution, because

many of these birds live side by side. Nature was not selective, because God

created an integrated ecosystem with all species.

2 - SPONTANEOUS GENERATION

In the Middle Ages, spread abroad the possibility of

spontaneous generation that purported could arise living beings

of any inanimate materials such as garbage, dirt and mud. There

were "experts" that said frogs and mice and other animals could

arise wood, straw and air. Imagine that even in modern times, in

the eighteenth century, a doctor of Belgium arrived to give a


[ 69 ]

recipe to produce mice in 21 days using a dirty shirt and

spreading wheat germ.

The Theory of Spontaneous Generation began to

crumble when the biologist and Italian physician Francesco

Redi, in 1668 proved by experience that spontaneous generation

did not occur in fact. The experiment was to take two pieces of

meat by placing a piece in an open bottle and the other he

repaired it. After a while, he can observe the emergence of

larvae in the open bottle, also noted constant presence of flies

who observed the growth of larvae. At the end of the

experiment, it was observed that the larvae become like fly the

flying around the open bottle. Ended that there was never

emergence of living beings from inanimate matter, but due to

the deposit of eggs and larvae of insects.

When science class had already discarded the theory of

spontaneous generation, John Needhan in 1745 in England,

raised discussions on this subject with their new experiences,

this time, the improvement of the microscope enabled the

discovery of small living organisms, were protozoa as unable to

explain the origin of these tiny beings, appealed again to the

theory of spontaneous generation, as John Needhan had put

broth in various bottles, some open and others closed at the end

of a few days, all bottles were with microorganisms.

For over a century, this theory was widely accepted

until the French scientist Pasteur prove the falsity of this theory.

In 1864, the Academy of Sciences in Paris, Pasteur disproved


[ 70 ]

spontaneous generation, he claimed that life comes from life,

agreeing to a great truth taught in the Bible that says, "For with

thee is the fountain of all life (Psalm 36.9)."

Yes, all life comes from another life and all living

things originate from God, the fountain of life. Pasteur proved

that microbes that existed on the water were always from

another, by mechanism of reproduction. The confirmation was

achieved when the broth was first sterilized, sealed and isolating

the air. A whole year has passed and when they opened the

bottle in front of several scientists has noted that there did not

exist microorganisms.

In honor of Pasteur, the sterilization process was called

PASTEURIZATION. Thus, the idea of life have provided the

inanimate matter was deeply shaken, and the theory of

spontaneous generation was discarded.

In fact the theory of evolution is a building without a

foundation and without columns, so she does not deserve

credibility of smart people. The Superinteressante Brazilian

magazine brought an article titled: Man is born, it read this

statement that fits well with the ridiculous situation of

SPONTANEOUS GENERATION:

In this endless search for origins, each new finding, however,

seems to increase the area of controversy among experts. Just a fossil is

dug or more a genetic laboratory experience, to mess with the building of

hypotheses about the evolution of the human race.


[ 71 ]

(SUPERINTERESSANTE Magazine, September 1988, p

46)

Bottle covered and uncovered with decaying flesh. The worms in

the flesh come from eggs laid by flies. When the seal prevents entry of flies,

worms do not appear.

3 - HERITAGE CHARACTER PURCHASED

The first who tried to explain the theory of evolution of

species was Jean Lamarck. His theory was based on the changes

that species suffer due to the environment. The first base their

arguments was the LAW USE AND DISUSE. For the more we

use a part of the body, the more it develops and the parts that are

not used, end up atrophying. Based on this law, Lamarck

believed that new physical characteristics were transmitted

hereditarily to the next generation. Lamarck well explained its

THEORY OF HERITAGE CHARACTER ACQUIRED:

A - NECK OF THE GIRAFFE


[ 72 ]

According to Lamarck, the neck length of this animal

originated by the ongoing effort to stretch to reach food in the

upper branches of trees.

B - CACTUS

According to Lamarck, plant suffered the same process

and acquired the hereditary characteristics. The cactus and other

plants of desert climate began to have the current aspect of the

need to store water and have acquired this characteristic as the

region was drier.

C THE SNAKES

Also according to Lamarck, long ago, snakes had short

legs, but due to the change in the environment, she started to

crawl rather than walk.

D - THE FALSEHOOD OF LAMARCK THEORY

The Lamarck's theory began to unravel when practiced

an experience as reported at the 18th lesson of Biology of the

Brazilian Universal Institute:

There was an experiment with mice, in which they cut the tail of

these animals and crossing them later. The descendants were born with tails

that were soon cut. Were crossed and again the offspring were born with

tails. This was done until the 20 generations. Individuals of the twenty first

generations still had the same tails of the first generation. (BRAZILIAN

UNIVERSAL INSTITUTE, 18th Biology lesson)


[ 73 ]

How were scientifically proven in 20 generations, the

new features inflicted in mice were not transmitted hereditarily,

thus proving the impossibility of the evolution of new species.

De Beer commented on the impact of the failure of Lamarck's

theory:

No one would have thought of doubt that, by the end of the

nineteenth century, the number of men, before the nineteenth century that

rejected the inheritance of acquired characteristics could be counted on the

fingers of one hand. (CHARLES DARWIN, p 163)

In 1996 was published a retrospective of the scientific

community, and explained why Lamarck's theory was wrong:

The acquired characters are not inherited as environmental

factors (which may not affect the genes in the sex cells) cannot influence the

next generation. (COMPENDIUM RETROSPECTIVE OF BIOLOGY 1996:

304 and 305)

Let us also a more detailed explanation of the

impossibility of evolution of Lamarck in the geneticist HJ

Muller, Nobel Prize winner, explains:

Despite the influence of the environment on the body modification

as a whole, and even their plasma cells, the genes in the germ cells of the

body retains its original structure without specific changes caused by the

body modification, so that when the individual reproduces, transmits its

progeny, genes not affected by its own acquired characters.

(ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, volume 22, p 988)

Even the Communists rejected Lamarck's ideas, as

reported the "Times" magazine, commenting on the following

reasons:


[ 74 ]

Heredity is controlled by genes in reproductive cells and remains

unchanged during the life of the individual. (Times, 12/02/1965)

According to Lamarck, forced to eat leaves and buds on the trees,

the giraffe is forced continually to stretch up. This habit kept for long periods

and by all individuals of the race resulted in the neck stretching.

Teething horse


[ 75 ]

Teething cow

The horse has superior incisors; the cow does not have them. Both

the horse and the cow feed the same food and exist side by side. There is no

sense in the event of a have evolved with superior incisors and another not.

The environment does not influence the genotypes of living beings. Lamarck

was wrong.

4 - NATURAL SELECTION

Darwin who lived in the nineteenth century

revolutionized the world with his theory of evolution. In 1859 he

published in his book "The Origin of Species" his explanation of

the evolution of the process called "Natural Selection". Here are

the mains points of the theory:

A - In a given environment, individuals endowed with

favorable variations will be better able to survive than those

with unfavorable variations. Thus, favorable variations are


[ 76 ]

transmitted to offspring and, accumulating over time, give rise

to big differences.

B - The process of natural selection imposed by the

environment, and continued for several generations produces

more and more perfect and complex adaptations, determining

thus a progressive process.

Natural selection also leaves much to be desired

because it does not explain the fact that animals of all sizes and

as varied coexist in the same biome without the disappearance

of the weakest. The ecosystem explains how a living being

depends on others. If evolution were true, there would be serious

disturbances in the ecosystem. It is concluded that the ecosystem

pleads in favor of belief in creation and not evolution.

In fact, the findings of Darwin do not seem to be

reasonable. Consider:

On one of his trips by South America, Darwin came to the

archipelago of the Galapagos Islands, noting that there should have been a

selection in nature, because in some islands only larger turtles appear to

biology, the mith of evolution

Documents

myth of evolution biology

book biology

scribe valdemir

purpose of biology

theory of evolution

steps of evolution

process of evolution

m543 menezes