blakes lane, hare hatch, berkshire, rg10 9ta
TRANSCRIPT
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
Blakes Lane, Hare Hatch, Berkshire, RG10 9TA
Design & Access Statement
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SITE CONTEXT
3.0 EXISTING HOUSE
3.1 Historic maps & Original Dwelling
3.2 Planning History
3.3 Description
4.0 RELEVANT PLANNING POLICY
5.0 PROPOSAL
5.1 CLOPUD Application
5.2 Outline
5.3 Access & Landscaping
5.4 Amount & Scale
5.5 Impact
5.6 Footprint
5.7 Internal layout
5.8 Volume
5.9 Materials
5.10 Ecology
5.11 Sustainability
6.0 GREEN BELT POLICY ISSUES IN THE CONTEXT OF A ‘FALLBACK’ OPTION
7.0 CONCLUSION
8.0 APPENDIX
CONTENTS2
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
This Design and Access statement has been prepared in support of a full planning
application to Wokingham Borough Council for the proposed alterations and extensions
to Merchiston, Blakes Lane, Hare Hatch.
This statement considers the site and the context of the dwelling and sets out the design
development and its rationale. Consideration is also given to the relevant planning policy.
The proposal seeks to alter and extend the existing house to provide modern living
accommodation to meet the needs of a new owner with an improved internal layout.
This document is provided to illustrate the thought behind the scheme and the design
process which has led to the current proposal for the property on Blakes Lane, Hare
Hatch, RG10 9TA.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Existing Site Location Plan
3
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
Merchiston is located off Blakes Lane and sits within the Green Belt.
Situated in the North of Hare Hatch and West of Wargrave, Merchiston is located in the
countryside, lying in between agricultural land, woodland and hedgegrow.
The house sits within a large plot in relation to the building itself, being approximately
0.5 ha in area. The dwelling is located on the North East of the site and is partially visible
from Blakes Lane through the entrance gates.
The original dwelling was constructed in Edwardian style and is approximately 100
years old. The group of houses that encompass the dwelling case of study have a
similar plot size and construction style.
A large extension of the garden is South-facing, however, much of the existing living
accommodation of Merchiston, specifically the annex, doesn’t benefit from the orientation
and views accross the garden.
The site has currently a main entrance that leads to a detached garage and an area of
hard-landscaping for drop-off and access. A bothy is located to the East of the property,
near the tennis court.
Mature trees, dense planting and a mixture of timber fencing and brickwork walls define
the extremities of the site to the road side and neighbouring residences.
2 SITE CONTEXT
2.1 Existing Site Plan
4
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
3.1 HISTORIC MAPS & ORIGINAL DWELLING
3 EXISTING DWELLING
1899 OS Extract 1912 OS Extract 2013 Google Maps Extract1968-1972 OS Extract
Having regard to historic maps and to relevant planning history records, it is evident
that the building which today forms Merchiston was erected in the early 20th century.
Lord and Lady Lydford owned Merchiston from new (1910) during which time (pre-war)
they added the two storey bay window as this is not of cavity wall construction.
Colin Graham purchased the property from Lord and Lady Lydford in 1969 and lived
there for approximately 25 years. On 8th October 1982 planning permission was given
to convert a laundry room, cart store and stable into the single storey side ‘granny’
annexe.
In 1989 planning permission was given for the erection of a double garage. Mr and
Mrs McDade purchased the property from Colin Graham approximately 16 years ago
(around 1994) and planning permission was given to erect a fence around the tennis
court on 26th February 1996. Mr and Mrs Cowley purchased the property from Mr and
Mrs MacDade in April 2010.
The site had historic planning permission for the erection of a stable building dated
20th November 1987 but this was made when the adjacent land was owned by Colin
Graham and this has now been sold off from the main house and garden.
The loft has been converted for residential use since 1979.
5
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
3.2 PLANNING HISTORY
3 EXISTING DWELLING
Information below obtained from LLC1- Requisition of search and Official Certificate of
Search issued by Wokinham Borough Council on 23rd June 2016.
18079 - Proposed erection of single storey addition (granny annex)
Conditional Approval
8th October 1982
28593 - Proposed erection of a stable
Conditional Approval
29683 - Detached double garage
Conditional Approval
1989
96/63284/F - Proposed erection of 2.75m high fence around tennis court
Conditional Approval
26th February 1996
F/2011/0352 - Proposed erection of a new front pitched roof dormer extension, plus
enlargement of existing rear dormer window.
Conditional Approval
7th April 2011
3.2.1 Single storey extension 3.2.2 Detached double garage 3.2.3 Entrance gates
6
F/2011/0457 - Erection of a iron railing fence and vehicular entrance gates
Conditional Approval
171373 - Application for a certificate of lawfulness for the proposed erection of a two
storey rear extension and a single storey side extension, erection of two single storey
outbuildings within residential curtilage, comprising an indoor swimming pool and a
games room.
Conditional Approval
22nd June 2017
172329 - Householder Application for proposed erection of single storey sides extensions
to dwelling, proposed demolition of existing annex and new vehicle access.
Application Withdrawn
26th October 2017
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
The existing and original dwelling is a three-storey detached house built in the Edwardian
style.
External walls of the main house are exposed red brickwork in flemish bond with
stone lintels over principal openings. Painted single glazed timber windows are used
extensively to the main house. The detached double garage is constructed out of a
mixture of exposed brickwork and flint and the bothy is finished in white render with
exposed timber structure.
The roofs on both, the house and the garage, are machine made clay plain tiles featuring
dormer windows and gable ends, whilst the bothy’s roof is thatched.
Previous extensions such as the single storey annex and the two-storey bay window
are distingishable due to variation in the age and quality of the brick work, colour and
pointing. The annex was built ‘flush’ with the existing dwelling and presents very poor
construction. Due to its location, set back from the South facade, the sunlight and views
to the garden are very limited.
These existing arrangements limit the connection between internal and external spaces
and it also complicates the internal circulation.
3.3 DESCRIPTION
3 EXISTING DWELLING
3.3.3 Existing Second Floor Plan
3.3.2 Existing First Floor Plan
Master
Bedroom
Bed 1
Bed 2
Bathroom
Bed 3
Office
Kitchen
Utility
Utility Living
Dining
Hall
Hall
3.3.1 Existing Ground Floor Plan
Bed 4
Ensuite
7
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston 4 RELEVANT PLANNING POLICY
Adopted Wokingham Borough Council Local Plan following policies have been taken
in consideration during the design process of this proposal. Special attention has been
taken to the policy relating to developments in the Green Belt:
- Paragraph 89 of the National Planning Policy Framework sets out that although
the construction of new buildings is inappropriate in the Green Belt, there are certain
exceptions, for instance:
- The extension or alteration of a building provided that it does not result in
disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building;
- Policy TB01: Development within the Green Belt
Due to the restrictive policies that apply to the Green Belt and the need to retain the
openness of the countryside, only limited extensions to a dwelling will generally be
permitted. ‘Limited’ means a cumulative increase of generally no more than a 35%
increase in volume over and above the original dwelling.
With regard to the construction, alteration or extension of buildings ancillary to a dwelling,
changes should not result in disproportionate additions to the original building(s) or
cause a detrimental alteration to the scale of the dwelling or to the scale of development
on the site.
- CP1 & CP3
Core Strategy Policy CP1 supports development that maintains or enhances the high
quality environment and Policy CP3 supports development that is of appropiate design
and preserves the amenity of adjoining land users.
- CP11 - Proposals outside Development Limits (including countryside)
In order to protect the separate identity of settlements and maintain the quality of the
environment, proposals outside of development limits will not normally be permitted
except where:
-In the case of residential extensions, does not result in inappropriate increases in the
scale, form or footprint of the original building;
Restricting development outside of development limits also helps protect the separate
identity of settlements and maintain the quality of the borough’s environment which is
recognised in the Audit Report.
CP12 - Green Belt
The Metropolitan Green Belt in the borough as illustrated on the key diagram comprises
the land North and East of Twyford but excluding Wargrave. It also includes the land in
the parish of St. Nicholas Hurst east of The Straight Mile and north of Carter’s Hill.
In line with the guidance in PPG2 (Planning Policy Guidance 2: Green Belts), one of the
key features of Green Belts is their permanence.
Within the borough’s Green Belt any proposal that harms the open character of the area
or entails inappropriate development will not be acceptable.
8
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
The proposal seeks to alter and extend the existing house to provide living
accommodation to meet the needs of a growing family with improved internal layout
and to provide a building that reacts directly to its site context and its surrounding area.
It is intended that the proposed extensions and alterations will be in keeping with the
character of the existing dwelling. The extensions and additions will take and adjust
elements of the existing building to keep a continuous aesthetic towards Blakes Lane,
providing a balanced and well-composed building, both respectful to the original and
to its surrounding context.
The application proposes to demolish an overly long and poorly detailed existing western
single storey extension and replace it it with a more compact single storey extension. In
addition two and single storey enlargements are proposed to the rear and eastern side
of the application property to help balance the volumes.
5 PROPOSAL
5.2 OUTLINE
5.2.2 Contemporary extension
JPPC submitted a CLOPUD Application (171373) for the proposed erection of a two
storey rear extension and a single storey side extension and the erection of two single
storey outbuildings within residential curtilage, comprising an indoor swimming pool
and a games room.
The decision letter was received on the 22nd June 2017 confirming the proposed
extensions and outbuildings could be developed under Permitted Developmend.
The ability to enlarge the amount of primary accommodation within PD parameters
represents a ‘fallback’ option for the applicants and the volume and footprint of the
house would be tangibly larger if the PD extensions were undertaken. The volume would
be 30% larger and the footprint would be 21% bigger (Please refer to pages number 14
and 15 for further information and calculations).
Volume and footprint comparisons have been also included in this document to
determine the impact on the site. Section 6.0 includes further information about the
Green Belt Policy issues in the context of a ‘fallback’ option.
5.1 CLOPUD APPLICATION
5.2.1 Orientation & views study to determine the best use of the rooms
9
16.641 | DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT spratley studios
Merchiston
The proposal would be set back from the front elevation and it would be covered
with a sympathetic gable roof, therefore it would be considered as a subservient and
well-balanced addition which would not detract from the appearance of the dwelling.
Furthermore, the proposed fenestration within the front elevation would comprise
cohesive and similar window types and proposed materials which would be in keeping
with the apearance of the main house and as such would preserve the semi-rural
character of he area.
However, the proposal at the rear features a contemporary design with clean geometric
volumes and large glazed panels to maximise views to the garden.
The proposal aims to open up the ground floor layout providing an open-plan kitchen
and family room, providing a clear structure of spaces. Large sliding doors towards the
garden have the potential to open up the internal space to more successfully link with
the garden and provide a modern internal/external living.
There are no inmediate neighbours and so the new extensions do not have any visual
impact to the surrounding site. The proposal seeks to upgrade the existing inefficient
accomodation by reconfiguring the internal layout and rationalising rooms to provide
improved living accommodation, which better links to the garden & greater site.
5.2.3 Images for reference 5.2.4 Open Plan
5 PROPOSAL10