blank pleading template with line numbering -- word · web viewyour affiant states that anna...

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Anna Taylor, the natural living woman,Sui Juris, Pro Se,c/o 123 street Middletown, Connecticut [ zip code] Tele: (860) 123-4567

SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUTSUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT

Family Division - 1 Court Street, Middletown, CT 06457

In re Estate Matter of Anna Taylor, the natural living woman

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT Plaintiff/vs/

Anna Taylor, the natural living woman Defendant

Note: Respondent Anna Taylor, the natural living woman, appears specially not generally and not voluntarily, pursuant to the UNITED STATES special rules of Admiralty Rule e(8).

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

CASE # _____________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT /vs/ Anna Taylor

Defendant Anna Taylor, the natural living woman’s AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMMAND AND DEMAND Judge Trial Referee of the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Family Division, FOR THE INSTANT CASE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE, FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND OR OTHER; AND THE IMMEDICATE RETURN TO Anna Taylor, the natural living woman’s SOLE AND STOLEN PROPERTY, biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child IN THE INSTANT CASE. [CAL. EVID. CODE 1280, 1284]

NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH MEMORANDUM OF POINTS &

AUTHORITIES

– of 20 – SUPERIOR COURT OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE # ______________

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMMAND AND DEMAND Judge Trial Referee of the SUPPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, Family Division, FOR THE INSTANT CASE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE, FOR LACK OF JURISDCTION; SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND OR OTHER; AND THE IMMEDIATE RETURN TO Anna Taylor, the natural living woman’s SOLE AND STOLEN PROPERTY, biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/ child IN THE INSTANT CASE.

Obey my demands & commands or be destroyed

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

) VERIFICATION

NOTE TO COURT CLERK: TITLE 18 US CODE SECTION 2071-NOTE TO COURT CLERK: TITLE 18 US CODE SECTION 2071-CONCEALMENT, REMOVAL, OR MUTILATION GENERALLYCONCEALMENT, REMOVAL, OR MUTILATION GENERALLY

(a)(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys,Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record,or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record,

proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerkproceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court, of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicialor officer of any court, of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned notor public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not

more than three years more than three years

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Affidavit in support of Command and Demand Dismissal with prejudice of instant case Affidavit in support of Command and Demand Dismissal with prejudice of instant case

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

Anna Taylor, the natural living woman Anna Taylor, the natural living woman

Comes now your Affiant Anna Taylor, the natural living woman, makes these statements under oath and first being duly sworn according to law, states that she is your Affiant, and she believes these facts to be true to the best of her knowledge.

1. Your Affiant , being over the age of 18, states as follows:2. Your Affiant makes this affidavit in the CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, COUNTY OF

MIDDLESEX , on May ____ , 2018.3. Your Affiant states that the undersigned has first-hand knowledge of all the

facts stated herein.4. Your Affiant states that the facts described herein are true, complete and

not misleading.5. Your Affiant states that the facts described herein describe events that have

occurred within the COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6. Your Affiant states Anna Taylor is a non-corporate, real, mortal, sentient, flesh and blood, natural born individual woman, who is living, and a being, on the soil, with clean hands, rectus curia and does not hold the office of ‘person’.

7. Your Affiant states that your Affiant makes these statements freely, without reservation.

8. Your Affiant states that if your Affiant is compelled to testify regarding the facts stated herein that the undersigned is competent to do so.

9. Your Affiant states that an all upper case formatted name applies only to vessels at sea, or a deceased individual, and/or a deceased individual’s name on a tombstone, or, a corporation/trust.

10. Your Affiant states that the real woman, Anna Taylor does not spell her name in all capitalized letters.

11. Your Affiant states that Litigants’ constitutional (inalienable and guaranteed) rights (given by God) are violated when courts depart from precedent, where parties are similarly situated. See Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8 th Cir. 2000)

12. Your Affiant states that the undersigned submits the following facts, law and authority as basis for and in support of this pleading. STATEMENT OF FACTS

13.Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman, repeats, re-

alleges, and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs of this Affidavit as if fully set forth herein.

14. Your Affiant states that this Affidavit is pursuant to Connecticut Code of Evidence________________.

15. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is the biological mother of Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

16. Your Affiant states that Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child is the biological daughter born to undersigned Anna Taylor, the natural living woman in instant case.

17. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor’s biological girl/child, Jolie Taylor is a non-corporate, real, mortal, sentient, flesh and blood, natural born individual daughter, who is living and a being on soil, with clean hands, rectus curia and does not hold the office of ‘person’.

18. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child is the misconstrued girl/child in instant case.

19. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman gave birth to her biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child, on __________________.

20. Your Affiant states that witness ____________________ was present for the live birth of biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child in instant case.

21. Your Affiant states that witness ____________________ is a midwife. 22. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the

natural living girl/child has been written and added by undersigned to the undersigned’s Family Tree 1st page of public record document: Holy Bible.

23. Your Affiant states that printing/writing and adding the undersigned’s daughter Jolie Taylor’s name to the undersigned’s family tree on the ?st page of the public record document: Holy Bible is a legal registration of a live birth.

24. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child in instant case belongs to undersigned.

25. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child is the proceeds and product of undersigned’s natural, living body, given to undersigned by God.

26. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child is the sole property of the undersigned.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

27. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman has not registered the birth of her biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT, or any other state within the United States of America.

28. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman will not register the birth of her biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT, or any other state within the United States of America.

29. Your Affiant states that it is not a crime for Anna Taylor, the natural living woman to not register her own biological, natural born, living and breathing daughter with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT.

30. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman has not applied for a social security card for her biological daughter Jolie Taylor, natural living girl/child with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT, or any other state within the United States of America.

31. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman will not apply for a social security card for her biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child.

32. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living child, has been removed from undersigned because undersigned has not registered the birth her biological daughter Jolie Taylor, natural living girl/child with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT.

33. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is protected by the United States Constitution.

34. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is the beneficiary of the United States Constitution.

35. Your Affiant states that American Jurisprudence Book 16 : states Constitution Law Section 16Am Jur 2d., Section 97 “Then a constitution




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.” Bary v. United States – 273 US 128 “Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be literally construed in favor of the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary”

36. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman hereby terminates, revokes, rescinds any/all authority the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX may feel that the undersigned has given.

37. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION in instant case.

38. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman references United States District Court District of Connecticut Case 3:17-cv-01993-AWT.

39. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have any JURISDICTION in instant case.

40. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have PERSONAL JURISDICTION in instant case.

41. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION in instant case because undersigned’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child’s birth is not registered with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT or any other state within the United States of America.

42. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have PERSONAL JURISDICTION in instant case because undersigned’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

girl/child’s birth is not registered with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT or any other state within the United States of America.

43. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have any JURISDICTION in instant case because undersigned’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child’s birth is not registered with the STATE OF CONNECTICUT or any other state within the United States of America.

44. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNETICUT is a corporate tribunal.

45. Your Affiant states that the undersigned, Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is being forced to attend court hearings.

46. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn has signed an oath of office to support and defend the United States Constitution.

47. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is the judge in instant case.

48. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is a corporate administrator.

49. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is a public official.

50. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is aware that she does not have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION in instant case.

51. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is aware that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX does not have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION in instant case.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

52. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court clerks have previously refused to file stamp documents submitted into the public record by undersigned in instant case.

53. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly has engaged in conspiring to violate Anna Taylor’s due process rights in instant case.

54. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly has engaged in conspiring to violate Anna Taylor’s civil rights in instant case.

55. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is a civil action for deprivation of rights.

56. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly has engaged in conspiracy against undersigned in instant case.

57. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1985 is the conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.

58. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1986 is the action for neglect to prevent

59. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 18 U.S.C. Section 241 is conspiracy against rights.

60. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242 is the deprivation of rights under color of law.

61. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman has the right to self representation.

62. Your Affiant states that the sixth amendment right is the right to self representation.

63. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly,




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

knowingly conspired to violate Anna Taylor, the natural living woman’s first amendment right, freedom of speech in instant case.

64. Your Affiant states that on April _____, 2018, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly threatened Anna Taylor, the natural living woman with contempt in instant case.

65. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged to conspire in the kidnapping of Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child in instant case.

66. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1201 is the law for kidnapping.

67. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring to human trafficking in instant case.

68. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring with fraud in instant case.

69. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring with RICO in instant case.

70. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring with perjury in instant case.

71. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1621 is the law for perjury generally.

72. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring with child abuse in instant case.

73. Your Affiant states that federal law Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3283 is the law for offenses against children generally.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

74. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring with the theft of Anna Taylor’s sole property in instant case.

75. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring to character assassination of Anna Taylor in instant case.

76. Your Affiant states that character assassination includes documented libel into the public record.

77. Your Affiant states that character assassination includes documented slander into the public record.

78. Your Affiant states that character assassination includes documented defamation into the public record.

79. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring to unjustified eighth amendment violation, Cruel and Unusual Punishment of Anna Taylor in instant case.

80. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring to violate undersigned’s fourth amendment right; search and seizure.

81.Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman in instant case has not been charged with a crime.

82. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged in conspiring to violate fourth amendment right, search and seizure of property of Anna Taylor, the natural living woman in instant case.

83. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly,




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

knowingly engaged in conspiring with MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF deputy to intimidate and mistreat Anna Taylor, the natural living woman on May ____ , 2018, in instant case, therefore violating proper decorum.

84. Your Affiant states that mistreatment and intimidation of undersigned may result in assault and battery charges.

85. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly engaged to conspire in reckless endangerment of a child, in instant case.

86. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is experiencing deliberate and intentional harassment from the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX contracted corporate agents, affiliates and others in instant case.

87. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is not a danger to herself.

88. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is not a danger to the undersigned’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child.

89.Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman is not a threat to anyone.

90. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, court appointed doctors are state officials.

91. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, court appointed doctors are contracted to the court.

92. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, court appointed doctors are paid by the court.

93. Your Affiant states that since the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed contracted doctors are paid by the court, therefore their psychological opinionated diagnosis is bias in favor of the court.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

94. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors, are not the undersigned’s personal physicians.

95. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors, do not personally know the undersigned.

96. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors do not act with objective reasonableness.

97. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors willfully, wantonly, knowingly have previously harmed natural living people, with cases in the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, and will harm natural living people in the future, with statements of their opinionated diagnosis, as it is their custom and policy.

98. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors are a danger to natural living people in society.

99. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors in instant case are guilty of medical malpractice.

100. Your Affiant states that the psychological opinionated diagnosis by court contracted doctors pertaining to Anna Taylor, the natural living woman in instant case are only opinions.

101. Your Affiant states that the psychological opinionated diagnosis by court contracted doctors are not based in law.

102. Your Affiant states that the psychological opinionated diagnosis by court contracted doctors is not based in law, therefore it does not matter.

103. Your Affiant states that the court must proceed in law and not opinion.

104. Your Affiant states that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX court appointed doctors willfully, wantonly, knowingly thru their evaluations in instant case




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

endangers the lives of natural living people in a ruse through the all capitalized cestique trust name.

105. Your Affiant states that all medical doctors involved in instant case should have their medical licenses permanently revoked.

106. Your Affiant states that all psychiatric doctors involved in instant case should have their psychiatric licenses permanently revoked.

107. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly has abused any/all authority she may have in instant case.

108. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn, willfully, wantonly, knowingly thru her court proceedings in instant case endangers the lives of natural living people in a ruse through the all capitalized cestique trust name.

109. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn, is a danger to natural living people in society.

110. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly has inflicted severe harm to Anna Taylor, the natural living woman.

111. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly has inflicted severe harm to Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child in instant case.

112. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, their contracted corporate agents, affiliates and others have willfully, wantonly, knowingly inflicted severe harm to Anna Taylor, the natural living woman.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

113. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTCUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, their contracted corporate agents, affiliates and others have willfully, wantonly, knowingly inflicted severe harm to Anna Taylor’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child in instant case.

114. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn willfully, wantonly, knowingly violated clearly established law in instant case, as it is her policy and custom.

115. Your Affiant states that it is SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX judge’s, attorneys, court appointed doctors follow custom and policy practices to remove children from their biological mothers as documented in book: Motherless America CONFRONTING WELFARE’S FATHERHOOD CUSTODY PROGRAM by author Doreen Ludwig.

116. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands an authenticated copy from the STATE OF CONNECTICUT medical license for ________ Police officer________ who has provided a medical diagnosis to MIDDLESEX Hospital for undersigned.

117. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands that Guardian Ad Litem ____________ for _____________be immediately removed from instant case.

118. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands the curriculum vitae for ________ Police Officer ________________ who has provided a medical diagnosis to MIDDLESEX Hospital for undersigned.

119. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is guilty of malfeasance because Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is aware that the undersigned has not been charged with a crime, therefore the court does not have jurisdiction.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

120. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is aware that Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is guilty of moral turpitude because the undersigned has not been charged with a crime, therefore the court does not have jurisdiction.

121. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is guilty of judicial misconduct because Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is aware that the undersigned has not been charged with a crime, therefore the court does not have jurisdiction.

122. Your Affiant states that SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn is not protected by any/all immunity for any/all crimes Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn knowingly, willfully, wantonly has committed against undersigned.

123. Your Affiant states that jurisdiction or lack of jurisdiction may be challenged by either party at any time.

124. Your Affiant states that failure to respond in 21 days to the commands and demands by undersigned in instant case, will result in a default.

125. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands a response within 21 days from SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn in instant case.

126. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands

127. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands from the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX provide from a higher claim the wet seal signature delegation of authority given over undersigned to administer undersigned’s estate.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

128. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman commands and demands the SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX Judge Trial Referee Barbara M. Quinn provided from a higher claim the wet seal signature delegation of authority given over undersigned to administer undersigned’s estate.

129. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman may proceed with legal actions for the injury inflicted to undersigned by all those involved in instant case.

130. Your Affiant states that Anna Taylor, the natural living woman may proceed with legal actions for the injury inflicted to undersigned’s biological daughter Jolie Taylor, the natural living girl/child by all those involved in instant case.




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

1) “Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather should dismiss the action.”

[Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026]

2) “However late this objection has been made, or may be made in any cause, in an inferior or appellate court of the United States, it must be considered and decided, before any court can move one further step in the cause; as any movement is necessarily the exercise of jurisdiction”.

Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 657, 718, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838)

3) “It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given.. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one”.

Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 404, 5 L.Ed. 257, 6 Wheat. 264 (1821)

4) Where there is not jurisdiction over the subject matter, there is, as well, no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.

[John J. Joyce v. United States of America, 474 F.2d 215, 219] Joyce v. U.S., 474 F.2d 215, 219 (C.A.3(Pa.), 1973)

5) “The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction.” Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F 2d 416

6) “The law provided that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.”

Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980)




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

7) “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.” Basso v.Utah Power & Light Co. 495 F 2d 906, 910

8) “Defense of lack jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal.’

Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp.478 So. 2d, 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)

9) “Court must prove on the record , all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.”

Lantana v. Hopper 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F. Supp. 150

10) “A void judgment is to be distinguished from an erroneous one, in that, the latter is subject only to direct attack. A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect.”

Lubben v. Selective Service System , 453 F. 2d 645, 649 (1st. Cir. 1972)

11) “A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is nullity. [A judgment shown to be void for lack of personal service on the defendant in a nullity.]”

Sramek v. Sramek , 17 Kan. App. 2d 573, 576-77, 840 P.2d 553 (1992). Rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093 (1993)

12) “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority , and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities; they are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.”

Williamson v. Berry, 8 HOW. 945, 540 12 L.Ed. 1170, 1189 (1850)

13) “Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.”Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca. 2d 751, 211 P. 2d 389

14) “The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.”

Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533

15) “A judgment obtained without jurisdiction over the defendant is void.”Overby v. Overby, 457 S.W.2d 851 (Tenn. 1970), Volume 20; Corpus Juris, Sec. 1975

16) “Challenge to court’s jurisdiction is raised by motion to dismiss.” Criterion C. v. State, 458 So.2d. 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)

17) “Since jurisdiction is fundamental alone that gives a court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be continuing in the court throughout the proceedings.”




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Re. Cavitt, 254, P. 599

18) “Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction.”

Dillon v. Dillon, 187, P. 2719) “A court may not render a judgment which transcends the limits of it authority, and a

judgment is void if it is beyond the powers granted to the court by the law of its organization, even where the court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. Thus, if a court is authorized by statue to entertain jurisdiction in a particular case only, and undertakes to exercise the jurisdiction conferred in a case to which the statute has no application, the judgment rendered is void.”

46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments 25, pp. 388-89

20) “The lack of statutory authority to make particular order or a judgment is akin to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and is subject to collateral attack.”

46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments 25, pp. 388-89

21) “Where there are no depositions, admissions, or affidavits the court has no facts to rely on for a summary determination.”

Trinsey v. Pagliario, D.C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647

22) “A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court.”

Old Wayne Mut. L. Assoc. v. Mcdonough, 204 U.S. 8,27 S. Ct. 236 (1907)




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VERIFICATIONVERIFICATION

I, the undersigned make this declaration under penalty of perjury, that the pleading is true. Each of the signer(s) of this document is a person having first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein. The undersigned has made a reasonable inquiry into fact and law and affirms to the court that this claim:

1. is not frivolous or intended solely to harass.2. is not made in Bad Faith - Nor for any improper purpose, i.e. harass or delay.3. may advocate changes in the law - arguments justified by existing law or non-frivolous

argument to change law.4. has Foundations for factual allegations - alleged facts have evidentiary support.5. and has Foundation for denials – denials of factual allegations must be warranted by

evidence.

All Rights Reserved UCC §1-308

DATED: May _____, 2018 By: ____/s/ ______ Anna Taylor ______________ Anna Taylor, the natural living woman




blank pleading template with line numbering -- word · web viewyour affiant states that anna...

Documents