blue creek ps - evidence set · jessica . mary g . aleesha georgia . dee . scott . rachel . jeff...
TRANSCRIPT
Data Sample
Blue Creek Public School
To support the case study of:
Effective Classroom Practice
Sustaining and Growing
Note: the following document contains samples of the actual data the school drew upon in their self-assessment. This is not an example of an evidence set for external validation. For more information about external validation, visit self-assessment and external validation on the evidence guide website.
Blue Creek Public School
DATA COLLECTION PROCESS
Determine where to next Consult scope and sequence, syllabus and other school planning document cycles.
Examine expectations Based on the length of the learning cycle and performance standards (eg Mathematics rubric, syllabus document), determine what level of achievement is expected at the end of the learning cycle What must students master during this cycle?
Create a common post assessment To be administered at the conclusion of the teaching cycle
Administer the common post assessment BEFORE teaching What do students already have, knowledge, skills etc Who is starting from scratch in skills or application of skills?
Send pre test data to supervisor By mid first week of the cycle team leaders must have the data collection sheet for your class
Team leader charts data Data in graphical form back to team by the end of the first week of the teaching learning cycle
Analyse strengths and obstacles Set goals and strategies to meet goals
Teach
Administer post test Three days prior to next meeting administer the post test Results back to supervisor 2 days prior to the next cycle meeting
Meet as a team Supervisor displays data for discussion as to student progress towards goals, success of strategies etc
Determine where to next
Blue Creek Public School DATA ANALYSIS
What is the expected level of achievement for this assessment after the teaching cycle is complete? 70% of students will be at the expected level (C) or above for whole number. 80% of students will be at the expected level (C) or above for the post test on active and passive voice. Class: 4K Teacher: Mrs K
Assessment date: Term: 4 Week: 4 Post
How many lessons will the students have on this concept? 2
Describe the teaching strategies, frequency of lessons, support etc. to be implemented for this concept? Numeracy: Students will be involved in 2 lessons on whole number. They will learn to round numbers to the nearest tens, hundreds,
thousands and ten thousands place values. They will learn to use the < less than and > greater than symbols correctly as well as use the correct language to show the relationship between numbers.
Literacy: Students will be involved in 4 lessons for compare and contrast. During these lessons students will have the opportunity to read text that shows compare and contrast, as well as write information that shows they have recognised the text that is comparing and contrasting.
Areas for analysis
Number of students who
took the assessment.
Number of students well
below expectation.
Number of students almost
achieving expectation.
Number of students achieving
expectation.
Students exceeding
expectation.
Names of students well below
expectation.
Names of students almost achieving
expectation.
Compare & Contrast 27 4 2 14 7
Whole number - rounding <
and > 30 0 0 2 27
Students absent
Notes: 0
Blue Creek PS 2015 STAFF LEARNING DAY STRUCTURE
Rationale A collaborative approach to team planning and individual professional development is vital in building a culture of excellence in teaching and learning. Teachers are given the opportunity to work alongside their colleagues to reflect on student achievement and to collaborate on where to next. Supervisors to work with their team members to review current teaching and learning practices on an individual basis. Future directions are to be determined and implemented in a supportive and collaborative manner.
This approach is part of the BCPS School Plan 2015 – 2017.
Strategic direction 2: Staff leading innovative, reflective practices. Practices: Staff utilise evidence of learning to drive their teaching and as the source of reflection as to the effectiveness of their teaching. Judgments about student learning are consistent across grades and the school. Evidence of learning is used to allocate school resources to areas of need. TPL is based on intensive professional dialogue and collaborative planning around student learning and the impact of quality teaching upon learning. TPL is enquiry based (lesson study, peer coaching, and feedback intensive) and is linked to AITSL Standards framework.
Strategic direction 3: Delivering a comprehensive, balanced curriculum. Practices: Specialist programs and resources targeted to meet the specific needs of students with disabilities, Aboriginal students and students with learning difficulties via access to up to date student learning data, ongoing review of specialist teacher workflow and timetables. Specialist programs are targeted to improve student outcomes whilst increasing all teachers’ ability to cater for diverse needs. An integrated approach to program delivery is in place ensuring coverage of all KLAs each term. All class programs cater explicitly for the diverse learning needs of every student. An appropriate balance of all 6 KLAs is in place in all classrooms. This is evidenced through walkthroughs of class practice, student work and teacher engagement in the professional development framework.
Agenda Overview of day falls into 4 parts:
1.0 hr - Input session Topics may include formative assessment, Synthetic Phonics, Writing improvement, implementation of ICT, developing integrated programs, Learning about learning, brain development, behaviour, EALD knowledge of pedagogical practices etc. Focus of this section is to be learning about learning. i.e. how do students learn in … How do students learn to read? What do we need to do to address learning needs in…???
1.0hrs - Data analysis and synthesis together as a stage. Discuss the learning cycle data in terms of student achievement and teacher learning and strategies that appear to have worked. The recognition and celebration of teaching strategies to be the shared. (The emphasis of it being a treasure hunt, not a witch hunt). The focus is to be about learning about learning. Specialist staff need to be involved in the learning day.
1.5hrs - Learning cycle planning as grades Including the allocation of LAS and EALD resources to address needs. Backward mapped approach to an area of English and Mathematics that will give effective data that can be used to drive teaching and learning. Clear success criteria developed for the set assessments - pre and post. Clear understanding of what the assessment will look like.
2.0hrs – Coaching session with team leader Class teachers released to meet with supervisor for up to 0.5 hrs. One on one coaching session with team member and their supervisor. This session will discuss individual class goals, student needs, areas of teacher strength, plan lesson visits and observations, areas of future development, performance development plans, and review of extracurricular leadership/ contribution. If more than 30 minutes is needed, additional follow up to occur in the same week. LAS and EAL/D staff utilise this time to plan for the next cycle, review ILP progress
Blue Creek PS DATA TEAM PROCESS for Learning Cycles
Determine where to next Consult scope and sequence, syllabus and other school planning document cycles.
Examine expectations Based on the length of the learning cycle and performance standards (e.g. Mathematics rubric, syllabus document, plan data, other school data), determine what level of achievement is expected at the end of the learning cycle. What must students master during this cycle? How will I differentiate my instruction?
Create a post assessment To be administered at the conclusion of the teaching cycle
Administer the pre assessment What do students already have, knowledge, skills etc. Who is starting from scratch in skills or application of skills?
Send pre test data to your team leader Within the first two days of the learning cycle meeting, team leaders must have the data collection sheet for your class.
Team leader charts data Data in graphical form back to team by the end of the first week of the teaching learning cycle. What implications do the results have for your teaching over the next weeks? Do you need to revise your expectations based on the pre-test results?
Analyse strengths and obstacles Set goals and strategies to meet goals.
Teach
Administer post assessment Three days prior to next meeting administer the post test. Results back to supervisor 2 days prior to the next cycle meeting.
Team leader charts data
Meet as a team Supervisor displays data for discussion as to student progress towards goals, success of strategies etc. Discussion to focus on strategies that worked and why.
Determine where to next As a team determine what would need to be done next time to get better results from students.
Blue Creek PS SCHEDULE OF PROFESSIONAL LEARNING 2015
LEARNING DAYS
Date Activity Delivered by
Term 1, Week 10 Goal Setting Feedback Direct Instruction
Julie - Anne
Term 2, Week 5 Differentiation Gradual release of responsibility
Julie - Anne
Term 2, Week 9 Creative & Critical Thinking Julie - Anne
Term 3, Week 5 Vocabulary Grammar & Punctuation
Liz
Term 3, Week 9 Literacy Continuum Liz
Term 4, Week 5 Moderating Samples for Website Team leaders
Term 4, Week 10 Moderating Samples for Website Team leaders
STAFF DEVELOPMENT DAYS
Date Activity Delivered by
Term 2 Science Curriculum Julie – Anne & Daniela
Term 3 ICT Yasemin & ICT Committee
STAFF MEETINGS
Date Activity Delivered by
Term 2, Week 2 PBIS Refresher Leah & Melinda
Term 2, Week 3 Spelling Liz & Literacy Committee
Term 2, Week 4 Team Meetings Team Leaders
Term 2, Week 5 Learning Days Team Leaders
Term 2, Week 8 Reading @ BCPS Liz & Literacy Committee
Term 2, Week 9 Planning Days Team leaders
LESSON STUDY
Term Focus
2 Number
3 Reading
4 Writing
ASSESSMENT AND DATA COLLECTION SCHEDULE Term 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PLANN Literacy (ES1) PLANN Numeracy (ES1) Numeracy Continuum (1-6) Literacy Continuum (1-6) Reading folder Reading Benchmark Synthetic phonics (all components) New students ILP review OOHC Review Aboriginal Ed Review ESL Scales/Phases Writing sample Learning cycle data Class reports NAPLAN Yr 4&6 Yr 4&6 Record cards Learning and Support reviews Behaviour cards Health plans Milestones meeting
Data gathered through record searches and analaysed to determine directions Assessment implemented, plans reviewed Data entry to school record systems eg Sentral, ERN, record cards, reading folders, writing folders Data submitted to supervisors
8 9 wk10/11
__________________________________________________ _____
Blue Creek PS: Lesson Observations, Sem1
WALK THOUGHS Group A, Term 2 2015
Observation Focus: Teacher Feedback to Students
What evidence is there of providing feedback to students to improve their learning?
Agenda 9:00-‐ 9:40 Welcome, Walkthrough Orientation
9:40-‐ 10:20 Observations
10:30 – 11:00 Debrief/ Feedback
11:00 – 11.30 Morning Tea
GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 GROUP 4 Samson Maree
Jessica
Mary G Aleesha
Georgia
Dee
Scott
Rachel Jeff
Ben
Dora Koursaris (CPS)
Liam Wilson (EPS)
Alex Moussawer (HPS)
Maria Leiva (SSHS)
Anna Capra (SSPS)
Gordan Callaughan (SPS)
Sean Kelleher (CPS)
Kristen Fanning (EPS)
Wendy Owen (HPS)
Amenah Mourad (MBPS)
Vicki Lodge (SSHS)
Anna Farrugia (GPS)
Sarah Lakiss (CSPS)
Mariam Derbas (CPS)
Sarah Borg (EPS)
Katrina Drakea (SSHS)
Christina Cotis (SSHS)
Karen (APS)
Matt Knight (SPS)
Melanie Young (CSPS)
Danielle Hajinakitas (CPS)
Bronwyn Owen (MBPS)
Chris Matthews (SSP)
Natalie Sinderberry
(SSHS)
Ashbury 2
Kim Greeshaw (SPS)
Time Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
9:40 KJ KD KH 21A
9:50 21A 21R KP KJ
10:00 21C 21S 21R 65I
10:10 43K 654F 65C 43M
10.20 65M 65I 43M 43K
_______________________________________________________
Blue Creek PS: Lesson Observations, Sem1
Term 2 Wk 9 Group 1
Observation Focus: Teacher Feedback to Students
What evidence is there of providing feedback to students to improve their learning?
Peer Observer: Insert Name and redact
Observations Professional Practice, Standard 5; Assess, provide feedback, report on student
learning.
Consider;
Walls that Teach
Visible Learning
LISC LISC for feedback
Differentiated learning
Student engagement
Examples of Feedback
_______________________________________________________
Blue Creek PS: Lesson Observations, Sem1
Findings
TASK LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
TEACHER STUDENT
Challenging LISC evident Explicit Independent tasks in most instruction learners
Project based Used by Facilitating Self – directed learning teachers learning & On task -
Collaborative 70% encouraging engaged group tasks 10/14 Conferencing Demonstrating
Differentiated Crooms support autonomy
Student choice (Total Guiding A variety of – free roam 20CRTs) questions learning
Engaging tasks WILF & Monitoring structures;
Student WALT Roaming groups, pairs,
centred Visible Team teaching independent
Student learning Working with Able to
directed Walls that small groups communicate
Goal orientated teach Questioning the learning goal
tasks Vocabulary students about Cooperation
Using posters learning Collaboration
technology to Student
complete tasks work
Scaffolded samples
Variety of Furniture
media organised for
Problem- student
solving centred
Creative learning
Behaviour code
Visual aids
ICTs – variety of devices
Overall our observations summarised are;
- LISC are almost always student centred, not teacher centred.
- The teachers are at student desks, on the floor, moving around, with students
facilitating.
- Our students are engaged with interesting learning.
- Scaffolds to support learning abound
- Students working collaboratively use LISC to self/peer review
- 70% of participating teachers are using LISC to feed forward to students and shape next
steps in learning
IJKLMNNOPQKRKSTPUKVKWXYZ
QRSTUVWSXYZW[V\]S^Z_Z^WS[\S`\Y^S[ZabScZadZ^e WYfZ^gVW\^Sa]dSV]W[^Yh[V\]acScZadZ^i jZhaYWZS\_S[UZSWYff\^[Sf^\gVdZdSkl
m]WnZ^ZdlSopS qrVffZdlSs
13
: v v v v v v v v v v t t t t t t t t t7 t
4
5
3
ab ab UagZ UagZ r]\n ab dZcV UagZ _ZZc ]\n YWZ ab r]\n _ZZc r]\n _ZZc _ZZc [Zah WZZ gacY b\^Z b\^Z a V]h^ a{\Y ]\n gZ^ WZZ] b\^Z YWZ k}T {Z[[ b\^Z b\^Z b\^Z b\^Z [UZ U a Z ana^ ̂ Z_c {Z[[ ZaWZ [ a UV|U a h\]_ da[a b\^Z Z^ a{\Y h\]_ a{\Y h\]_ WhU\ n^V[ f\WV cZWW Ziii Ziii Ziii diii ciii {iii Ziii fiii Viii {iii [iii aiii [iii Viii [iii Viii \iii Viii [iii \iii
~\n �]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
�]\ ca{Zc2
3V|U T\[ac 4ZV|U[Zd mgZ^a|Z
<=>=?@A><B<@A
?C>DEF??G H@I?@IJIADKJ<@LAJD
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
sissw
3
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
sissw
3
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
otiHpw
2 16 7857
<=>=?@A
@ACGAEJIMA>IN>=O
JA<EFINL>H@<EJIEA
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
sissw
3
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
sissw
3
otiHpw
2
otiHpw
2
otiHpw
2 16 7857
F<MA><>rAJJA@ sNtA@DJ<NtINL>?C C?@=<JIMA
<DDADD=ANJ
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
uoistw
4
sissw
3
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5 16 7811
F<MA>INE@A<DAt
=O>Es@@IEsGs=
uN?BGAtLA
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
uoistw
4
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1 16 7839
uN?B><r?sJ GADD?N>DJstO
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
tiuvw
1
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
uviIuw
9
sissw
3
otiHpw
2 16 7839
<=>N?B><>rAJJA@ JA<EFA@
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
tiuvw
1
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2 16 98:6
tAGIMA@>FILFA@ vs<GIJO>JA<EFINL
<Nt>GA<@NINL
titvw
1
ovivHw
2
titvw
1
titvw
1
ovivHw
2
sissw
3
titvw
1
ovivHw
2
uuiuuw
4
titvw
1 1: 98:6
F<MA>DAAN><
H?DIJIMA>I=H<EJ IN>=O>DJstANJDw GA<@NINL
?sJE?=AD
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
uoistw
4
sissw
3
otiHpw
2
uoistw
4
otiHpw
2
sissw
3 16 98;6
CAAG>=?@A
E?NCItANJ>IN>=O
JA<EFINL
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1 16 98;6
N?B>sDA>t<J<
rAJJA@>J?>t@IMA
=O>JA<EFINL
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
sissw
3
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
otiHpw
2
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
sissw
3 16 989:
sDA>xyz>=?@A
JF<N>H@AMI?sDGO
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
sissw
3
ositIw
5
Ioitzw
7
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
ositIw
5
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1 16 984;
1>K>5
IJKLMNNOPQKRKSTPUKVKWXYZ LMP[T\]O^_T\
<=>rAJJA@><rGA>J?
tICCA@ANJI<JA>C?@ JFA>NAAtD>?C>=O
DJstANJD
ositIw
5
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
sissw
3
S 16
S 9845
uN?B>=?@A
<r?sJ>ACCAEJIMA
{<JFA=<JIED
JA<EFINL
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
uoistw
4
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
otiHpw
2
sissw
3
S 16
S 982;
CAAG>=?@A
E?NCItANJ>IN
HG<NNINL><Nt
JA<EFINL>IN><N
INJAL@<JAt>B<O
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
tiuvw
1
S 16
S 9825
uN?B>=?@A
<r?sJ>|ONJFAJIE
}F?NIED
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
sissw
3
uviIuw
9
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
sissw
3
S 16
S 9851
CAAG>=?@A
E?NCItANJ>IN>JFA
I=HGA=ANJ<JI?N
?C>|ONJFAJIE
}F?NIED
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
S 16
S 9851
CAAG>JFA>DEF??G F<D><
DJ@ANLJFANAt
EsGJs@A>?C E?GG<r?@<JI?N
uoistw
4
sissw
3
sissw
3
ositIw
5
uviIuw
9
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
tiuvw
1
S 16
S 9811
JA<EF>B@IJINL
rAJJA@>JF<N>x F<MA>rAC?@A
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
uoistw
4
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
sissw
3
S 16
S 9811
DAA><>H?DIJIMA
I=H<EJ>?N>=O
JA<EFINL
rAE<sDA>?C GADD?N>DJstO
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
ositIw
5
sissw
3
uoistw
4
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
sissw
3
otiHpw
2
tiuvw
1
S 16
S 9833
M<GsA>GADD?N
DJstO
otiHpw
2
otiHpw
2
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
otiHpw
2
otiHpw
2
sissw
3
ositIw
5
tiuvw
1
tiuvw
1
S 16
S 489:
5>K>5
Admin Other Coaching Dialogue Feedback lesson study Dem Lesson Observation Learning/Research Total in hours
4.1
0.00
4.2 120
60 3.00
4.3
30 30
60
2.00
4.4
150
30
3.00
4.5 30
60
90
3.00
4.6 60
120 3.00
4.7 120
60
3.00
2.8
60
60
60
3.00
4.9 60
60
60
120 5.00
4.10
180
3.00
Term Total in hours 6.50 0.00 8.50 0.50 3.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 5.00
0 28.00
number of hrs avilable Unaccounted
3 3.00
3 0.00
3 1.00
3 0.00
3 0.00
3 0.00
3 0.00
3 0.00
3 -2.00
3 0.00
30 2.00
What was the other this week? Who was the focus
120
30
60
120
60
6.50 0.00
150
60
60
60
180
8.50
30
0.50
30
60
60
60
3.50 0.000.00
60
30
90
60
4.00
60
120
120
5.00
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
2.8
4.9
4.10
Term Total in hours
Term
.Wee
k
Term 4 Instructional Leader Time Monitoring AP (Stage 2)
Admin Other Coaching Dialogue Feedback lesson study Dem Lesson Observation Learning/Research