blue gum high forest and microbat environmental management ...€¦ · blue gum high forest the...
TRANSCRIPT
Blue Gum High Forest and Microbat Environmental Management Plan
Calvary Ryde Retirement Community Redevelopment
Prepared for
Donald Cant Watts Corke
27 February 2017
Bl u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M icr o b a t E n v i r o nm e n ta l M a n a g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D ii
DOCUMENT TRACKING
Item Detail
Project Name Blue Gum High Forest and Microbat Environmental Management Plan
Project Number 17SUT - 6521
Project Manager
Rodney Armistead
+61 2 8536 8621
Suite 2, Level 3, 668 Old Princes Highway, Sutherland, NSW 2232
(PO Box 12)
Sutherland, NSW 1499 Prepared by Rodney Armistead and Phil Witten
Reviewed by Jack Talbert
Approved by Beth Medway
Status DRAFT
Version Number 1
Last saved on 27 February 2017
Cover photo Eastern Bentwing-bat recorded at Waterfall (Belinda Failes 2014)
This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Blue Gum High Forest and Microbat
Environmental Management Plan. Prepared for Donald Cant Watts Corke’
Disclaimer
This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between
Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Donald Cant Watts Corke. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Donald
Cant Watts Corke, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on
the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers
should obtain up to date information.
Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon
this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific
assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited.
Template 29/9/2015
Bl u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M icr o b a t E n v i r o nm e n ta l M a n a g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D iii
Contents
Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. v
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Location of the subject site ........................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Profiles of the threatened entities that are known to occur within the study area ........................ 3
1.2.1 Blue Gum High Forest the Sydney Basin Bioregion .................................................................... 3
2 Management actions .................................................................................................................. 4
2.1 General management measures .................................................................................................. 4
2.1.1 Communication - Environmental induction and toolbox meetings ............................................... 4
2.2 Blue Gum High Forest .................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Microbat ........................................................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Unexpected or chance fauna find protocol ................................................................................... 6
References ............................................................................................................................................. 10
List of figures
Figure 1: Victoria Rd study area and the subject site................................................................................. 2
Figure 2: The degraded BGHF (Tree 413 and 414) that is to be removed ............................................... 7
Figure 3: The BGHF (Tree 456) that is to be retained and therefore requires protection ......................... 7
Figure 4: The open (lack of vegetation) cement culvert that could provide subterranean microbat roost
habitat ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 5: These procedures are to be implemented if there is an unexpected for chance fauna find ....... 9
Bl u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M icr o b a t E n v i r o nm e n ta l M a n a g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D iv
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Description
BGHF Blue Gum High Forest
Calvary Calvary Ryde Retirement Community Limited
CEEC Critically Endangered Ecological Community
DBH Diameter at breast height
DoE Department of the Environment
ELA Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth)
LDA Local Development Application
NSW New South Wales
OEH NSW Office of Environment and Heritage
TPZ Tree Protection Zone
TSC Act Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW)
Bl u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M icr o b a t E n v i r o nm e n ta l M a n a g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D v
Executive summary
Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd (ELA) was commissioned by Donald Cant Watts Corke on behalf of Calvary
Ryde Retirement Community Limited (Calvary) to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP).
The City of Ryde requested that the EMP be prepared following their assessment of a local development
application (LDA) (LDA2016/0295) for the construction of a four storey building, associated roads and
underground car parking (the subject site) at 642 – 678 Victoria Rd, Ryde (the study area).
The EMP has been deemed necessary as the following threatened entities and their habitat were
identified within or near to the subject site (2015 and 2016):
Four Eucalyptus saligna trees representing three isolated patches of Blue Gum High Forest
in the Sydney Basin Bioregion (BGHF) (listed as a critically endangered ecological
community (CEEC) under the New South Wales (NSW) Threatened Species Conservation
Act 1995 (TSC Act). These patches of BGHF are not of sufficient size (in hectares) or quality
to meet the condition thresholds for listing under the Commonwealths Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).
Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis (Eastern Bentwing Bat) (listed as vulnerable under the
TSC Act) was recorded on site during ultra-sonic call surveys, whilst potential subterranean
roost habitat for this species exists in the form of a cement culvert.
Under the current construction footprint, two patches of BGHF (consisting of Trees 97, 413 and 414 in
Arterra (2016)) and a cement culvert will be removed or demolished.
The purpose of this EMP is to provide strategies to all site staff and contractors that are aimed at protecting
the remaining patches of BGHF not effected by the proposed construction activities. Further, this EMP
also provides pre-clearance protocols aimed at excluding microbats from a cement culvert before it is
demolished.
In addition, potential foraging habitat exists at and near to the subject site for other threatened fauna,
including Falsistrellus tasmaniensis (Eastern False Pipistrelle), Mormopterus norfolkensis (East Coast
Freetail Bat), Scoteanax rueppellii (Greater Broad-nosed Bat), Pteropus poliocephalus (Grey-headed
Flying-fox) and Ninox strenua (Powerful Owl). Despite these species, and their habitat not being directly
impacted upon during construction, they could still use the subject site. For these and any other
threatened or non-threatened fauna species, a chance / unexpected threatened species find and stop
work strategy has been provided in this EMP. The aim of the chance / unexpected threatened species
find is to provide protection to threatened fauna and a strategy for site staff and contractors if they find a
fauna species that they are unsure about.
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 1
1 Introduction
City of Ryde has requested that an EMP be provided as part of the development approval process
for a local development application (LDA2016/0295). The City of Ryde considers this EMP
necessary because:
‘The Ecological Assessment provided with the development application has provided the following
condition:
“Given the presence of the BGHF and the culvert providing potential roosting habitat
for the Eastern Bentwing Bat, a site specific Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
should be developed that includes the precautions outlined below:
ecological pre-clearing survey procedures at the culvert, if roosting microbats are
detected in the culvert, actions to exclude these bats and block the culvert are
encouraged
chance threatened species find, stop work incidents and procedures, and
injured animal responses that involve ELA and wildlife carers.
The EMP should span the remaining construction period (i.e. tree removal works,
pre, during and post-construction phases).’
The purpose of this EMP is to provide strategies to all onsite staff and contractors to:
protect and manage the remaining patches of BGHF,
conduct pre-clearance surveys that are aimed at excluding microbats from the
cement culvert before it is demolished, and
protect any other threatened entity that may occur within the subject site during
construction through unexpected / chance find and stop work strategies.
1.1 Location of the subject si te
The study area is located approximately 11 km west of the Sydney Central Business District on
the corner of Victoria Road and Princes St, Ryde within the City of Ryde Local Government Area
(Figure 1). The subject site includes the area being immediately impacted by the proposed works
and is located in the north-eastern corner of the study area.
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 2
Figure 1: Victoria Rd study area and the subject site
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 3
1.2 Prof iles of the threatened ent it ies that are known to occur within the study area
1.2.1 Blue Gum High Forest the Sydney Basin Bioregion
Blue Gum High Forest the Sydney Basin Bioregion (BGHF) is the name given to the CEEC that is
dominated by tall Eucalyptus spp., has a dense mid-storey of shrubs and small trees as well as a
diverse ground layer of herbs, ferns and grasses (Australian Government and OEH 2005). Blue
Gum High Forest is listed as a CEEC because it currently occurs in a small number of highly
fragmented remnants, which occupy only 4.5% of its former extent (NSW Scientific Committee
2011: Department of the Environment (DoE) 2014).
The BGHF identified within or near to the subject site consists of three small patches that either
contain a single or at least two E. saligna trees (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Under the most recent
development plan, two patches of BGHF will be removed. This includes one patch that consists
of a single mature E. saligna tree (Tree 97 in Aterra (2016)) only, whilst the other patch consists
of two E. saligna trees (Trees 413 and 414 in Arterra (2016)). The canopy of these two patches
extends over an area of approximately 0.04 ha.
Furthermore, Condition 15 of the City of Ryde (2016) states that ‘It will be necessary to re-design’
the proposed development footprint in order to retain Tree 97. Tree 97 is a large mature E. saligna
that will be removed under the current development plan.
Only one patch of BGHF (including two E. saligna trees (Trees 413 and 414)) will be removed
(Figure 2) under this proposed change. Therefore, Tree 97 and 413 (Figure 3) will require
protection, in addition to the other trees identified for protection in Arterra (2016).
Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis (Eastern Bentwing Bat)
The Eastern Bent-wing Bat was recorded within the study area during a targeted ultra-sonic microbat
survey (ELA 2016). The Eastern Bent-wing Bat is listed as a vulnerable species under Schedule 2 of
the TSC Act. This species occupies a range of environments including wet and dry sclerophyll forests,
open woodlands and grass lands along the coastal portion of eastern Australia (Churchill 2008). This
species generally roosts in caves, mines, culverts, stormwater channels, buildings, and occasionally
tree-hollows (Churchill 2008). Individuals of this species have been found occupying a number of
different roosts within specific territory. They travel large distances between their summer maternal sites
in the Great Dividing Range and winter foraging and torpor habitats (Churchill 2008; Hoye and Hall
2008).
The proposed construction of the four storey building will result in the demolition of a cement
culvert could provide subterranean roosting habitat for the Eastern Bentwing Bat (Figure 4).
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 4
2 Management actions
2.1 General management measures
2.1.1 Communication - Environmental induction and toolbox meetings
All contractor staff should be made aware of the sensitive environmental issues present within the
subject site before commencing works. This information should be provided through general
environmental site inductions and routine toolbox meetings. The environmental inductions and
toolbox meetings should focus on the BGHF and the microbats that are known occur on site, what
to look for and unexpected find strategies discussed below.
2.2 Blue Gum High Forest
General tree protection measures have been outlined by Arterra (2016). The measures provided
in Arterra (2016) are aimed at avoiding negative impacts to those trees being retained during the
construction works. This includes the two E. saligna trees (Trees 97 and 456) that form the BGHF.
In order to avoid replication, we have selected and summarised the key components of
Arterra (2016), whilst adding relevant information only if deemed necessary.
To protect the BGHF, a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) must be first established around each tree
and / or the entire BGHF patch. A TPZ is a designated area that encompasses the root zone,
canopy and crown of a tree. A TPZ is calculated by measuring the diameter of tree stem (or
stems) at 1.4m (or the diameter at breast height (DBH)) above the ground and then multiplying
this measurement by 12. The TPZ is then determined by laying out a measuring tape measuring
the distance that was determined by multiplying the DBH by 12.
A step by step methodology for measuring a TPZ can be viewed at City of Ryde,
http://www.ryde.nsw.gov.au/Environment-and-Waste/Trees/Tree-Protection-Zone-Calculator,
Once the TPZ has been established, the following is to occur:
Install tree protection fencing around the TPZ in accordance with the following:
o For those trees being retained, in this case E. saligna trees 97 and 456 (BGHF),
protective fencing to be erected around their TPZ to protect and isolate them from
the construction works.
o All protective fencing must comply with the Australian Standard, AS 4687-2007,
Temporary fencing and hoardings. We recommend that 1.8 m high cyclone fence
with steel mesh to be installed to protect the Trees 97 and 456 TPZ, as well as
any other tree that requires protection (see Arterra 2016).
o This protective fence must be installed prior to commencement of any
construction activities and remain intact until the completion of all construction
works.
o Once erected, the protective fencing around each patch of BGHF must not be
removed or altered without consultation between the site supervisor and the
project ecologist.
o If the protective fencing requires temporary removal for any reason, then trunk,
branch and ground protection must be installed.
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 5
o Weather proof and visually obvious ‘no entry / no go’ signs (must at least 300
mm high and 450mm wide) must be attached to the protective fencing to
ensure that all site staff and contractors are aware of the TPZ
Please note, that in addition to the BGHF patches identified for protection in this EMP,
Arterra (2016) has identified other trees that require similar levels of protection.
In those areas designated as TPZ, there is to be access to site staff, no vehicle movement, no digging,
movement of surface soil, dumping of mulch, stockpiling, placement of site sheds or laydown of
equipment. If it is deemed that a TPZ boundary fails to provide sufficient crown and root protection, the
TPZ boundary should be widened. This will need to be determined in consultation with site managers,
consulting ecologist and / or arborist.
The TPZ and protective measures discussed above must comply with AS 4970-2009, Protection
of Trees on Development Sites.
2.3 Microbat
The proposed development will result in the demolition of an open culvert. The open culvert has the
potential to provide habitat to subterranean roosting microbats. Indeed, the subterranean roosting
Eastern Bentwing Bat, which is listed as vulnerable under TSC Act was recorded at the subject site
during a targeted ultra-sonic microbat call surveys (ELA 2016).
The following management actions are to occur through all stages of construction and are aimed at
limiting the potential impacts that might occur upon the Eastern Bentwing Bat and any other microbat
species that might be present within the subject site. These actions include:
Actions to occur during the pre-construction stage include:
o engage a suitably qualitied and experienced ecologist to conduct an evening
pre-clearance survey to monitor microbats leaving the culvert beginning half an
hour before sunset and continuing until there is a sustained period of inactivity,
as recorded on an anabat recorder, around the entrance of culvert
o ecologist to conduct an inspection of the culverts interior for microbat activity, to
be certain that the culvert is empty of microbats, and then,
o with the assistance of construction staff, seal off the entrance of the culvert
using timber boards, star pickets and fabric to exclude microbats from re-
entering.
It is expected that because Eastern Bentwing Bats have multiple roosts within a single territory,
that once this roost is blocked, they will move to one of their roost sites located nearby.
Actions to occur during the construction of the building:
o time the construction activities so that they have the lowest potential for direct or
indirect impacts upon microbats. We suggest that the demolition of the culvert
occur at a time when microbats are most active or absent from the region and
not breeding. For example, Eastern Bentwing Bats are mostly absent from the
Sydney region between October and May
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 6
o engage an ecologist to be either present on site or at least on-call to attend the
subject site to capture, relocate bats and / or manage injured animals if a chance
or unexpected find happens (see unexpected find / stop work strategy below)
o maintain and conduct ongoing maintenance (when and if required) to the
materials used to block the culvert, until a time when the culvert has been
demolished
Actions during the post construction stages:
o None required, as the culvert is being demolished and a building is being built over it.
Therefore, this section is not applicable.
2.4 Unexpected or chance fauna f ind protocol
The subject site has potential foraging habitat for other threatened fauna, including Falsistrellus
tasmaniensis (Eastern False Pipistrelle), Mormopterus norfolkensis (East Coast Freetail Bat),
Scoteanax rueppellii (Greater Broad-nosed Bat), Pteropus poliocephalus (Grey-headed Flying-fox) and
Ninox strenua (Powerful Owl) (ELA 2016). Despite being considered unlikely that these fauna species
will be recorded while the building is being constructed, we encourage that a precautionary approach to
these species is implemented. This includes a chance or unexpected find protocol.
In the event of an expected or chance fauna find the procedures shown Figure 5 should be adhered to.
This includes, having the site manager immediately contact the ecologist if a threatened or unknown
fauna species is found or identified on the subject site during construction.
If uninjured fauna is found, including microbats, the project ecologist should be contacted to retrieve,
identify and then provide storage and care until they can be released at or near the point of capture at
a suitable and safe time. If an injured fauna species is found, then the ecologist should be contacted
and will transport the individuals to a local vet.
It should be recognised that some fauna species, for example bats, carry diseases that are
transmittable to humans. Because of this reason we encourage that construction staff do not
handle any bats unless it is deemed an emergency. Therefore, any handling of bats should be
undertaken by suitably experienced and immunised ecologists.
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 7
Figure 2: The degraded BGHF (Tree 413 and 414) that is to be removed
Figure 3: The BGHF (Tree 456) that is to be retained and therefore requires protection
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 8
Figure 4: The open (lack of vegetation) cement culvert that could provide subterranean microbat roost habitat
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 9
Figure 5: These procedures are to be implemented if there is an unexpected for chance fauna find
STOP WORK immediately in the vicinity (i.e 20 m radius) of the sighting and notify your supervisor.
Attempt to take a photo of the fauna species, nest or potential roost of concern to assist in identification of the species.
DO NOT recommence work until directed by the project ecologist or site supervisor.
The following should be notified in the following order:
Site Manager
Environmental Representative
Ecologist
Site or project supervisor to immediately notify site manager.
Photograph of fauna species to be taken and sent to
ecologist for advice. If it is a species of conservation
significance, the project ecologist will attend the site.
If required, the ecologist to delineate exclusion zone and
advise personnel of any mitigation measures.
If required, Joint site inspection conducted by site manager and ecologist to be undertaken to confirm observation.
Observation confirmed Observation not confirmed
If necessary, the Office of Environment and Heritage is to be notified of the observation and advise of proposed mitigation measures. This is to occur only after consultation between project manager and ecologist.
Works can recommence following direction from ecologist or other environmental representative.
Ecologist to recommend appropriate management
and mitigation measures to minimise impact.
Recommendations and mitigation measures to be
implemented onsite.
Monitoring and inspection, if and only as required.
To be determined by site supervisor in consultation
with ecologist.
Fauna species of concern, including microbats, nests or roost habitat is observed during the course of construction
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 10
References
Churchill, S. 1998. Australian Bats. Reed New Holland, Sydney.
Hoye, G.A. and Hall, L.S. 2008. Eastern Bent-wing Bat Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis. In
van Dyck, S. and Strahan, R. (eds). The Mammals of Australia. Third Edition. Reed New Holland,
Sydney.
Ca l var y R yd e B l u e G um H i g h F or e s t a n d M i cr o b at M a na g em e nt P l a n
© E CO LO G ICA L A U S T RA L IA P T Y LT D 11
HEAD OFFICE
Suite 2, Level 3
668-672 Old Princes Highway
Sutherland NSW 2232
T 02 8536 8600
F 02 9542 5622
SYDNEY
Suite 1, Level 1
101 Sussex Street
Sydney NSW 2000
T 02 8536 8650
F 02 9542 5622
HUSKISSON
Unit 1 51 Owen Street
Huskisson NSW 2540
T 02 4201 2264
F 02 4443 6655
CANBERRA
Level 2
11 London Circuit
Canberra ACT 2601
T 02 6103 0145
F 02 6103 0148
NEWCASTLE
Suites 28 & 29, Level 7
19 Bolton Street
Newcastle NSW 2300
T 02 4910 0125
F 02 4910 0126
NAROOMA
5/20 Canty Street
Narooma NSW 2546
T 02 4476 1151
F 02 4476 1161
COFFS HARBOUR
35 Orlando Street
Coffs Harbour Jetty NSW 2450
T 02 6651 5484
F 02 6651 6890
ARMIDALE
92 Taylor Street
Armidale NSW 2350
T 02 8081 2681
F 02 6772 1279
MUDGEE
Unit 1, Level 1
79 Market Street
Mudgee NSW 2850
T 02 4302 1230
F 02 6372 9230
PERTH
Suite 1 & 2
49 Ord Street
West Perth WA 6005
T 08 9227 1070
F 02 9542 5622
WOLLONGONG
Suite 204, Level 2
62 Moore Street
Austinmer NSW 2515
T 02 4201 2200
F 02 4268 4361
GOSFORD
Suite 5, Baker One
1-5 Baker Street
Gosford NSW 2250
T 02 4302 1220
F 02 4322 2897
DARWIN
16/56 Marina Boulevard
Cullen Bay NT 0820
T 08 8989 5601
F 08 8941 1220
BRISBANE
Suite 1 Level 3
471 Adelaide Street
Brisbane QLD 4000 T 07 3503 7191 F 07 3854 0310
1300 646 131 www.ecoaus.com.au