bme groups voice and influence, phil ware
DESCRIPTION
Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) Voluntary and Community Sector Voice and Influence - 'Very Small, Very Quiet, A Whisper' Presentation by Phil Ware, TSRC Research Fellow. First given June 2013, updated to this version January 2014.TRANSCRIPT
Ho
sted
by:
Fu
nd
ed b
y:
Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) Voluntary and Community Sector Voice and Influence – ‘Very Small, Very Quiet,
a Whisper’Phil Ware
Honorary Research FellowTSRC
Research Outline
• The research aimed to identify the voice and influence of the BME Community and Voluntary Sector in relation to: -
• a) The community and voluntary sector as a whole
• b) Local, regional and national policy makers and funders
• c) Mainstream provision
Research Methodology
• Literature Review• 14 semi-structured interviews with BME led
community groups in Birmingham, Greater Manchester and London
• 7 semi-structured interviews with strategic voluntary and statutory organisations.
• Focus Groups in Greater Manchester and Birmingham – 35 participants in total.
Timescales
• The project was set up in November 2011• Interviews were undertaken from March to
November 2012• A TSRC Working Paper and Briefing Paper have
been completed.• Findings of the project have been
disseminated through TSRC networks, BME networks and participants.
Findings 1
• Issues influenced included Equalities, Service provision, and specific campaigns e.g. anti-deportation and single cause.
The range of strategies being used: – 1. Capacity building and Partnership working2. Political approaches - resisting takeover of agenda by large
national organisations. “race...never on their agenda”.3. Demonstrating needs• The uncertain position of the BME VCS within the wider VCS.
“The voluntary sector is not immune from racism, so has ways of marginalising certain voices...”
Findings 2
• The current climate is affecting different parts of the Sector in different ways “..completely leaving communities like ours [Refugees and Asylum-seekers] out in the cold because... we’re not local.”
• Collective v Internal approaches• Some organisations less affected by funding issues. • The impact of the Equalities Act 2010. “Race , Gender,
Disability... all need to be addressed in [their own] way.”• Successes – message of persistence e.g. Lawrence. Southall
Black Sisters. Smaller groups reliant on own income. “The very smallest groups... actually might be in better place .”
Findings 3
• There is an identifiable BME Voluntary and Community Sector (VCS)
• Range of views within the Sector• Issue of leadership (lack of)• Lack of voice and influence beyond individual
and community levels• Many participants challenged by a lack of
resources and political antipathy
Findings 4 - Resilience
• Small organisations – not state funded and therefore are surviving
• Campaigns – many participants could point to examples of small campaign successes
• Increased diversity; increased ways of working• Dependency on volunteering and own
resources – is it sustainable?
Challenges and Questions
• Has the Single Equalities Act diluted voice and influence?• Are more established/white organisations claiming voice on
behalf of BME VCS? How are gender issues impacting?• Is there a BME VCS sector? “..the BME sector is diverse, there
is a lack of politicisation.” • Have BME organisations been distracted by agendas such as
Community Cohesion and Preventing Violent Extremism? “We set out to meet the need not follow the money”.
• Have BME groups been disproportionately affected by cuts? “disparity between [the white VCS] and the way funding is dispensed to the BME sector.”