board of ethics spain 109

Upload: ng-pipeline

Post on 30-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Board of Ethics Spain 109

    1/1

    135 Marion Avenue

    Wynantskill, NY 12198

    January 21, 2010

    Town of North Greenbush

    Board of Ethics

    Town Offices

    2 Douglas Street

    Wynantskill, NY 12198

    Dear Board Members:

    I respectfully request that you determine whether a Town Board member should recuse himself from a vote to approve

    a Residency Waiver and ultimately allow him to vote to appoint an individual to a paid town position who is providing a

    free service to a close family member.

    Upon information and belief, a person , Joshua Ehrlich, unlawfully holding an appointment as a Deputy Town Attorney in

    violation of a Public Officers Law requirement that he be a town resident, is providing FREE legal services to the brother

    of Councilman Al Spain. The services are being rendered in a civil case currently pending in Rensselaer City Court, North

    Greenbush Democratic Committee, Plaintiff vs. Jeffery Spain, Defendant.

    Attorney Ehrlich cannot legally hold the job he currently holds on the payroll of North Greenbush as a Deputy Town

    Attorney absent the Town Board approving a residency waiver from the NY State Public Officers Law. As a result of this

    situation, the Town Board majority supported by Councilman Spain, has voted 3-1-1 to hold a Public Hearing on January

    28th

    at 6:45 PM to hear public comment on a proposed Local Law, attached, which if approved by the Town Board,

    would permit Mr. Ehrlich, a resident of Albany County with a criminal record, to be legally appointed by the Town

    Board.

    You should be aware that Councilman Louis Desso has recused himself from these proceedings upon his disclosure that

    another non resident attorney who would also benefit financially from an appointment as a Deputy Town Attorney, is

    currently representing him a civil matter before State Supreme Court. Upon information and belief, those legal service

    are being provided pro bono as well.

    I am concerned that any vote by Town Board members to use their voting authority to provide a financial benefit to

    individuals who are in turn, providing FREE legal services to either a Board member or a member of his family, creates an

    unacceptable appearance of a quid pro quo that can only be avoided by the recusal of the Board members from any

    participation in such legislation. Relevant sections of the Town Ethics Law, including but not limited to S13-4No town

    employee shall use or attempt to use his official position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for himself or

    other may be violated as a result of any affirmative vote by Councilman Spain on this matter.

    I respectfully request your review of the circumstances surrounding Councilman Spains action to vote to approve the

    scheduling of the Public Hearing on January 28th

    and whether he should refrain from further participation at that hearing

    and any future vote to appoint Attorney Ehrlich should you determine that this attorney is in fact providing a financialbenefit to the Board members brother in the form of free legal representation.

    Sincerely,

    Charles B. Smith

    Enc(2)