boosted searches for ww/wz resonances in the ℓνj final state · 2016-08-07 · description of...
TRANSCRIPT
Boosted searches for WW/WZ resonances in the ℓνJ final stateBILLIE LUBIS
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY REU 2016
CERN◦ Founded in 1954 by 12 Western European countries → Now 22 member countries
◦ Aims to conduct cutting-edge particle physics research and foster collaboration
◦ Scientific accomplishments include development of WWW, creation of anti-hydrogen atoms, discovery of Higgs boson
◦ Home to LHC as well as many other accelerators
23 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS
Large Hadron Collider - LHC◦ Built from 1998 – 2008
◦ Largest and most powerful particle collider in the world
◦ 27 km ring, 175 m below ground
◦ Numerous detectors including ATLAS, CMS, ALICE, and LHCb
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 3
ATLAS◦ “A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS”
◦ General purpose detector at LHC
◦ Studies collisions of high energy protons
◦ Over 3000 physicists from 138 countries
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 4
ATLAS Detector◦ 46 meters long, 25 meters in diameter
◦ 7000 tons
◦ Components
◦ Inner Detector
◦ Electromagnetic calorimeters
◦ Hadronic calorimeter
◦ Muon detectors
◦ Magnets
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 5
Standard ModelQuarks◦ ½ integer spin
◦ Have color charge
◦ Interact via strong force
◦ Combine to form hadrons (baryons, mesons)
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 6
Leptons◦ ½ integer spin
◦ Electron, muon, tau interact electromagnetically
◦ Neutrinos interact via weak force
Standard ModelBosons◦ Integer spin
◦ Force carriers for the different types of interactions
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 7
Particle Identification
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 8
VV Resonances
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 9
◦ Searching for VV resonances in semileptonic decay mode
◦ Specifically VV → ℓνqq
◦ WW or WZ resonances
◦ W decays leptonically to ℓν pair
◦ Reconstruct W boson from lepton and neutrino vectors
◦ W/Z decays hadronically to quark and anti-quark
◦ Reconstruct in a large-R jet using anti-kt algorithm
◦ Calculate VV mass of event
◦ Signals used are Heavy vector triplet (HVT) or graviton (RS G*)
Objects SelectionLeptons◦ We require a final state with one lepton
◦ Veto events with more than one loose lepton while keeping signal candidate events with one tight lepton
◦ “Tight” and “loose” based on preselection cuts
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 10
Objects Selection
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 11
Triggers◦ Applied missing transverse energy trigger to muon channel
◦ Applied electron trigger to electron channel
Objects Selection
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 12
Small-R jets◦ ΔR > 1 between small-R and large-R jets
◦ Classified as b-jet if b-tagging variable MV2C10 > 0.1758
Objects SelectionLarge-R jets◦ ΔR > 1 between large-R jet and lepton (removed overlap)
◦ |η| < 2.0
◦ 𝑚𝐽 > 50 GeV
◦ 𝑝𝑇 > 200 GeV
◦ Use mass cut and substructure cut to identify jets from hadronic W/Z decays◦ Mass cut: ~65 – 120 GeV
◦ Substructure cut (based on the D2 variable): Differentiate W/Z from QCD jets
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 13
Description of Background/Data◦ Data is from 2015 and 2016 → Luminosity = 13.2 fb-1 and center of mass energy = 13 TeV
◦ Background composed of W+ jets, t ҧ𝑡, Z+ jets, and SM dibosons
◦ QCD is negligible
◦ Generators◦ V+ jets: Sherpa v22 & Njets correction applied
◦ t ҧ𝑡: Powheg-Pythia
◦ SM db: Sherpa
◦ HVT/Gravitons: MadGraph+Pythia8, with a mass width of ~6%
◦ Signal is normalized
◦ Backgrounds scaled to cross sections
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 14
Control and Signal Regions
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 15
◦ High purity regions pass substructure cut
◦ Low purity regions fail substructure cut
Control and Signal Regions
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 16
High purity WCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 17
High purity WCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 18
High purity TCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 19
High purity TCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 20
High purity SR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 21
High purity SR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 22
Low purity WCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 23
Low purity WCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 24
Low purity TCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 25
Low purity TCR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 26
Low purity SR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 27
Low purity SR plots
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 28
Data/MC Summary
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 29
Conclusions◦ Added low purity region to increase sensitivity
◦ Overall normalization problem
◦ Background fits shape of data fairly well
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 30
Acknowledgements◦ Thank you to
◦ John Parsons for this REU opportunity
◦ Poppy Iordanidou for her help and encouragement, and immense knowledge of ROOT
◦ The Columbia ATLAS group for their support
3 August 2016 BILLIE ELIZABETH LUBIS 31
Questions?