boston university school of management
DESCRIPTION
Boston University School of Management . New England Investment Research Challenge February 10 th , 2009 Presented by Joshua Enzer Jeff Li Mukesh Jagota Ashan Walpita. Investment Recommendation - BUY . Demand for Outsourcing. 6% Revenue CAGR. High Profit Margin. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Boston University School of Management
New England Investment Research Challenge February 10th, 2009
Presented byJoshua Enzer Jeff LiMukesh Jagota Ashan Walpita
Investment Recommendation - BUY
Demand for Outsourcing
Disease specific expertise
6% Revenue CAGR
Price Target Upside$25.01 $34.15 37%
High Profit Margin
Significantly Undervalued
Significant Investor value
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
in m
illio
ns
Growth in R&D Spending by 8 Largest Biotech Companies
R&D YOY Growth
2/4/2008 5/4/2008 8/4/2008 11/4/20081535557595
CF yield = 9%
Discovery
Preclinical
Phase I
Phase II-IV
Introduction
CRL provides research tools and support services to drug developers
Primary Customers: Pharmaceuticals Biotechnology Not-for-profit research
How Does Charles River Make Money
Research Models and Services Business (RMS)Leader in Sales of Research AnimalsCash Cow48% of RevenueSpecialties: Outbred Models Immunodeficient Models Disease Specific Models
Discovery
Preclinical
Preclinical Services Business (PCS)
Contract Research Organization (CRO)Growth Business52% of RevenueSpecialties: Toxicology Oncology Biologicals
Preclinical
Phase I
Industry
Growth
What’s going on
Product FocusOncology
Custom drugs
Biologicals33% CAGR
Expansion into China
22% of Total R&D on early stage
18% of Total R&D on early stage
2000 20070%5%
10%15%20%25%30%
Outsouring
Outsouring
Product focus
RMS/ CRO
Offerings
Market expansio
n
Geo graphic reach
FDA approved facility in Shanghai
Search for
Efficiency (CRO)
CRO + expertis
e
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20070
200
400
600
800
PCS rev
PCS rev
Late stage
pipeline focus
Short-term over
capacity
2008
2009201
02011
20122013
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
RMS PCS
Margin Compressio
n
CRL’s Value
2/4/2008 4/4/2008 6/4/2008 8/4/2008 10/4/2008 12/4/20080
20
40
60
80
100
120
S&P 500 CRL
Recent Events
• November 5: CRL announced Q3 Earnings, shares plunge on guidance
This Generates Revenue Opportunity Methodology
Total therapeutics R&D growth rate
Proportion dedicated to pre-clinical research
Penetration of preclinical outsourcing
CRL market share
CRL PCS revenue
Total therapeutics R&D growth rate
Total research model market
CRL market share
CRL RMS revenue
Pre-clinical services business Research Models Business
Total therapeutics R&D growth rate
Proportion dedicated to pre-clinical research
Penetration of preclinical outsourcing
CRL market share
CRL PCS revenue
Total therapeutics R&D growth rate
Total research model market
CRL market share
CRL RMS revenue
Revenue BreakdownMethodology
Pre-clinical services business Research Models Business
Revenue ProjectionsPCS – Revenue Growth Driver
In Billions
6%
CAGR
Margins and Leverage
Margin Compression
• RMS 5-7% Compression• PCS 7-10% Compression
Low Financial Leverage• Large Cash Reserve• Little Long-term Debt
• Maybe change this to credit capacity
• Low Capex going forward2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Margin Compression
RMS PCS
Valuation $34.15
DCF $49.33
Perpetuity
Growth
EBITDA Multipl
e
Multiples $18.97
Operating
Profit
Net Earnings
Target Price
Methodologies
Techniques
Key AssumptionsDiscount Rate (WACC) 9.5%Terminal Value Growth Rate
2.5%
Terminal Value Multiple 12.0x
5 year rev growth
Risks & Sensitivity
•Short-term over capacity▫06-08 Rapid
expansion
Key Risks Sensitivity
$34.15$30
0bp200bp Change
Margin compression
Dollar Appreciation
WACC
•Biotech bankruptcies▫20% of CRL’s
business•FX risk
▫50% of operations overseas
$31$28 $32 $33$25 $26 $27
Scenario
SELL
Investment Recommendation - BUY
Strong long-term industry growth
Significant expertise Stable financial position
Growth in top-line High Profit Margin
Significantly Undervalued
Significant Investor value
Price Target Upside$25.01 $34.15 37%
Questions
?
BUYPrice Target Upside
$25.01 $34.15 37%
Industry
Growth
What’s going on
Product FocusOncology
Custom drugs
Biologicals33% CAGR
Expansion into China
22% of Total R&D on early stage
18% of Total R&D on early stage
2000 20070%5%
10%15%20%25%30%
Outsouring
Outsouring
CRL’s Value
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20070
200
400
600
800
PCS rev
PCS rev
CRL’s Positioning FDA approved facility in Shanghai 29% CAGR
2008
2009201
02011
20122013
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
RMS PCS
Margin Compressio
n
Implied Valuation is Unreasonable
Implied ValuationAssumptions Pre-Guidance Post-Guidance
Price $33.90 $26.87Total therapeutics R&D growth 0.98% -1.96%
% Outsourced 30% 30%Gross margin 33.12% 31.38%EBITDA Margin 23.51% 21.76%WACC 10.21% 9.83%
TargetValuation
$34.15
2.8%
35%34.6%25.2%9.51%
Appendices• Charles River Laboratories• Revenue Model• Valuation• Industry & Competitive Positioning• Investment Risks
Charles River Laboratories•Earnings Estimates•Projected Income Statement•Income Statement Assumptions•Projected Balance Sheet•Balance Sheet Assumptions•Revenue Model•Segment Breakdown•Geographical Reach•CRL Customers
Revenue Model•Revenue Model: Summary•Projected Therapeutics R&D•Regression Model•Preclinical Spending Projections•Outsourcing Penetration•Market Share 6 YR Projections
Valuation•Discounted Cash Flow Model•TV: Perpetuity Growth Method•TV: EBITDA Multiple Method•WACC•Comparable Company Analysis•Historical P/E•CRL Market Profile
Industry and Competitive Positioning•Sector Breakdown•Industry Trends•RMS Market Revenue Breakdown•PCS Market Revenue Breakdown•Competitive Positioning
Industry Trends•Outsourcing•Specialist-Driven Products•Emerging Markets
Investment Risks•Sensitivities•Biotech Funding•Refocus on Late-Stage Drug Development
Segment Breakdown
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Research Models and Services BusinessRevenues 428.2 476.7 503.2 515.0 577.2 Revenue Growth 15.0% 11.3% 5.6% 2.4% 12.1%Operating Margin 31.9% 32.0% 31.8% 28.7% 30.7%Preclinical Services BusinessRevenues 185.5 247.6 490.2 543.4 653.4 Revenue Growth 2% 33% 98% 11% 20%Operating Margin 9% 13% 14% 15% 16%
Geographical Reach
CRL operates 60 facilities in 16 countries worldwide
US; 50.5%Europe; 27.6%
Canada; 16.4%
Japan; 4.6% Other; 1.0%
Sales by Geography
CRL Customers
Big Pharma and Large
Biotechs, 60%
Small Biotechs;
20%
Non-Profit; 20%
EPS EstimatesMar. Jun. Sept. Dec. Year P/E
Ratio2007A .544 .554 .619 .523 2.24 29.38
2008E .640 .713 .630 .487 2.47 9.58
2009E .529 .539 .602 .509 2.18 11.47
2010E .607 .618 .691 .584 2.50 10.00
Projected Income StatementEstimated
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013627.02 624.5 639.03 663.09 700.08691.34 735.24 851.57 971.96 1108.66
1318.36 1359.75 1490.59 1635.04 1808.73-388.75 -374.7 -377.03 -391.22 -406.04-504.68 -522.02 -596.1 -660.93 -742.8-893.43 -896.72 -973.12 -1052.15 -1148.84238.27 249.8 262 271.87 294.03186.66 213.22 255.47 311.03 365.86424.93 463.02 517.47 582.89 659.89
SG&A -222.75 -230.04 -252.77 -277.75 -307.69298.78 334.03 378.37 432.21 494.89-55.68 -57.58 -63.44 -69.85 -77.5243.1 276.45 314.93 362.37 417.39
7 7 7 7 7-29.78 -29.78 -29.78 -29.78 -29.78
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.11220.43 253.77 292.25 339.69 394.72-66.13 -76.13 -87.68 -101.91 -118.42154.3 177.64 204.58 237.79 276.31
Projected
Preclinical servicesTotal Revenues
Preclinical services
Pre-Tax Income (EBT)Other
Income from continuing operationsIncome taxes
Interest expense
Operating Income (EBIT)Interest income
EBITDADepreciation
Preclinical servicesGross profit
Research models and servicesCost of Revenues
Research models and services
Research models and services
Projected Income Statement
Income Statement Assumptions
Revenue Growth
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5YR Average
15.50% -6.00% -0.40% 2.30% 3.80% 5.60% 6.15%
-1.10% 7.00% 6.40% 15.80% 14.10% 14.10% 28.64% 6.70% 0.40% 3.10% 9.60% 9.70% 10.60% 14.93%
Preclinical services
Research models and services
Total Revenue growth
Income Statement Support Estimated Projected ($ in thousands, except per share data)
Income Statement Assumptions
COGS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 5YR Average
55.90% 62.00% 60.00% 59.00% 59.00% 58.00% 57.28%
67.00% 73.00% 71.00% 70.00% 68.00% 67.00% 66.66%Preclinical services
COGS % of RevenueResearch models and services
Income Statement Assumptions
S,G & A
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 3YR Average
12.40% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00%
13.80% 13.30% 13.30% 13.30% 13.30% 13.30% 13.30%Preclinical services
S,G & AResearch models and services
Income Statement Assumptions
Other estimates
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20133YR
Average5YR
AverageEffective Tax Rate 28.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 21.81% 28.79%Depreciation 4.80% 4.22% 4.23% 4.26% 4.27% 4.28% 4.22% 4.11%Amortization 2.36% 3.10% 3.20% 3.37% 3.50% 3.60% 3.67% 2.75%Other expense 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% -0.04%
Income Statement Assumptions
CAPEX
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-59.7 -41.35 -41.35 -29.85 -29.85 -29.85
-150.3 -28.3 -28.3 -84.8 -84.8 -84.8 -210 -70 -70 -115 -115 -115
Capex ( in million $)
Preclinical services
Research models and services
Projected Balance SheetAssets
ASSETS 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Cash And Equivalents 294.8 287.6 296.7 325.2 356.7 394.6
Excess cash from operations 108.6 266.6 379.9 538.9 725.3 Total Cash & ST Investments 294.8 396.2 563.3 705.1 895.6 1119.9
Accounts Receivable 237.5 231.7 239 262 287.3 317.9Inventory 99.3 110.1 110.5 119.9 129.6 141.6
Prepaid Exp. 27.9 31 31.1 33.7 36.5 39.8Restricted cash 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Other Current Assets 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Total Current Assets 668.1 777.6 952.4 1129.3 1357.7 1627.7
Gross Property, Plant & Equipment 1459.2 1528.8 1598.5 1713.1 1827.8 1942.4Accumulated Depreciation -467.1 -522.7 -580.3 -643.8 -713.6 -791.1
Net Property, Plant & Equipment 992.1 1006.1 1018.2 1069.4 1114.2 1151.3Long-term Investments 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5
Goodwill 1154.9 1154.9 1154.9 1154.9 1154.9 1154.9Other Intangibles 152.5 152.5 152.5 152.5 152.5 152.5
Other Long-Term Assets 35.2 35.2 35.2 35.2 35.2 35.2Total Assets 3023.2 3146.7 3333.6 3561.6 3834.8 4142.1
Projected Balance SheetLiabilities
LIABILITIES 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Accounts Payable 39.3 39 43.8 42.4 51.3 50.1
Accrued Exp. 129 143.1 143.6 155.9 168.5 184Curr. Port. of LT Debt 239 239 77.9 31.2 48 146.5
Curr. Income Taxes Payable 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6Unearned Revenue, Current 129.6 126.5 130.4 143 156.9 173.5
Def. Tax Liability, Curr. 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6Other Current Liabilities 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Current Liabilities 562.3 572.9 421.1 397.9 450.1 579.5Long-Term Debt 303.7 303.7 464.8 511.5 494.7 396.2Minority Interest 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Pension & Other Post-Retire. Benefits 47.9 47.9 47.9 47.9 47.9 47.9Def. Tax Liability, Non-Curr. 71.5 71.5 71.5 71.5 71.5 71.5
Other Non-Current Liabilities 54.6 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 13.1Total Liabilities 1040.9 1010 1019.3 1042.8 1078.2 1109.1
Projected Balance SheetStockholder’s Equity
Stockholder's Equity 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Common Stock 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Additional Paid In Capital 1959.2 1959.2 1959.2 1959.2 1959.2 1959.2Retained Earnings 352.6 506.9 684.6 889.2 1126.9 1403.2
Treasury Stock -401.1 -401.1 -401.1 -401.1 -401.1 -401.1Comprehensive Inc. and Other 70.9 70.9 70.9 70.9 70.9 70.9
Total Common Equity 1982.4 2136.7 2314.3 2518.9 2756.7 3033
Balance Sheet AssumptionsBalance Sheet Assumptions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Cash And Equivalents (for ongoing operations) (% sales) 22% 22% 22% 22% 22% 22%
Accounts Receivable (% sales) 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18%
Inventory (% COGS) 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12%Prepaid Exp. (% of COGS) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Accounts Payable (% COGS) 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4%
Accrued Exp. (% COGS) 16% 16% 16% 16% 16% 16%
Unearned revenue (% sales) 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Assets
Liabilities
Revenue Model: SummaryRevenue ($millions) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total therapeutics R&D 58800.00 60235.90 59696.78 59456.80 60839.77 63130.39 66651.80Growth 7% 2.4% -0.9% -0.4% 2.3% 3.8% 5.6%
Preclinical & Phase I spending 14030.39 13826.84 12058.72 11770.03 12646.00 13515.78 14555.09% of R&D spending 24% 23% 20% 20% 21% 21% 22%Growth of preclinical spending 8% -4% -12% -2% 5% 3% 2%
Pre-clinical CRO penetration 24.46% 27.36% 30.17% 32.88% 35.44% 37.85% 40.09%Growth in penetration 13.7% 11.9% 10.3% 9.0% 7.8% 6.8% 5.9%
CRL Market share 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19% 19%Pre-clinical & Phase I services revenue 653.40 645.96 691.34 735.24 851.57 971.96 1108.66
Growth 20% -1% 7% 6% 16% 14% 14%Total therapeutics R&D 58800.00 60235.90 59696.78 59456.80 60839.77 63130.39 66651.80
Growth 6.5% 2.4% -0.9% -0.4% 2.3% 3.8% 5.6%Total RMS Revenue 1200 1,229.3 1,218.3 1,213.4 1,241.6 1,288.4 1,360.2 CRL Market Share (%) 48.1% 51.5% 51.5% 51.5% 51.5% 51.5% 51.5%
Mkt share growth 7.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%CRL RMS Revenue 577.20 666.77 627.02 624.50 639.03 663.09 700.08
Growth 12% 16% -6% 0% 2% 4% 6%Total Revenue (CRL) 1230.60 1312.73 1318.36 1359.75 1490.59 1635.04 1808.73
Growth 16.3% 6.7% 0.4% 3.1% 9.6% 9.7% 10.6%
R&D Therapeutics Regression Model
Projected Therapeutics R&D2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total theraputics R&D 60,236 59,697 59,457 60,840 63,130 66,652 R&D Growth rates 4.6% 4.5% 5.9% 7.9% 7.6% 8.5%
R&D Therapeutics Regression Model
Regression Model
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.4211
R Square 0.1773
Adjusted R Square 0.1653
Standard Error 0.135
Observations 70
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 1 0.2681 0.2681 14.6595 0.00028
Residual 68 1.2436 0.0182
Total 69 1.5117
Coefficients Standard
Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%
Intercept 0.057 0.024 2.383 0.0199 0.0092 0.1043 EBITDA Growth if EBITDA > 2500 0.487 0.127 3.829 0.00028 0.2331 0.7406
14 Largest Pharmaceutical and Biotechnological Companies with EBITDA over $2.5 billion in 2007
Preclinical Spending Projections
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Preclinical & Phase I spending 13,827 12,059 11,770 12,646 13,516 14,555 % of R&D spending 23% 20% 20% 21% 21% 22%Growth of preclinical spending -3.8% -12.0% -2.0% 5.0% 3.0% 2.0%
Projected Preclinical Spending Growth
Outsourcing PenetrationPenetration Growth
40% of preclinical research will be conducted by outsourcing providers in 2013 (CAGR of 8%).
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013Pre-clinical CRO penetration 27.4% 30.2% 32.9% 35.4% 37.8% 40.1%Growth in penetration 11.9% 10.3% 9.0% 7.8% 6.8% 5.9%
Market Share 6 YR ProjectionsRMS business – market share of 48%
PCS business – market share of 19%
Leadership position Proximity to customers Expertise in disease-specific models
Pool of renovated facilities Expertise in specialty therapeutics (biologics, oncology) Expansion to China
Discounted Cash Flow Model12456789
10111314
A B C D E F I J K L M NDiscounted Cash Flow Analysis Estimated Projected($ in thousands, except per share data) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013EBITDA $ 312.1 $ 298.8 $ 334.0 $ 378.4 $ 432.2 $ 494.9 EBIT $ 249.1 $ 243.1 $ 276.5 $ 314.9 $ 362.4 $ 417.4
Less: Cash Taxes @ 30.0% $ (74.7) $ (72.9) $ (82.9) $ (94.5) $ (108.7) $ (125.2) Tax-effected EBIT $ 174.4 $ 170.2 $ 193.5 $ 220.5 $ 253.7 $ 292.2
Plus: Depreciation $ 63.0 $ 55.7 $ 57.6 $ 63.4 $ 69.8 $ 77.5 Less: Capital expenditures $ (210.0) $ (69.7) $ (69.7) $ (114.7) $ (114.7) $ (114.7) Less: Change in net working capital $ (3.0) $ (0.7) $ (5.5) $ (17.2) $ (19.0) $ (22.9)
Unlevered free cash flow $ 24.4 $ 155.5 $ 176.0 $ 152.0 $ 189.8 $ 232.1 WACC @ 9.5%
NPV of Unlevered free cash flow @ 9.5% $683.81
TV: Perpetuity Growth Method
15161718192021222324252627
A B C D E F I J K L MPERPETUITY GROWTH METHODTerminal Value Undiscounted Discounted Total debt 542.71
Perpetuity Growth Rate 2.0% $ 3,968 $ 2,300 Preferred equity 02.5% $ 4,271 $ 2,476 Minority interest 0.3363.0% $ 4,622 $ 2,680 Cash 213
S/Out 67.167Target EV 3,160.18
DCF Range (Implied Enterprise Value) 2,984$ $ 3,363 Weighted Average
49.33Equity Value (a) $ 2,654 $ 3,033 Implied Price per Share (b) $ 39.51 $ 45.16
Target Price $42.13
––
–
TV: EBITDA Multiple Method
Jun-01
-2000
Jun-01
-2001
Jun-01
-2002
Jun-01
-2003
Jun-01
-2004
Jun-01
-2005
Jun-01
-2006
Jun-01
-2007
Jun-01
-2008
5.00x
7.00x
9.00x
11.00x
13.00x
15.00x
17.00x
19.00x
282930313233343536
A B C D E F I J K L M NEBITDA MULTIPLE METHODTerminal Value Undiscounted Discounted
EBITDA Multiple 10.0x $ 4,949 $ 2,869 Target EV 4126.8012.0x $ 5,939 $ 3,443 $ 3,553 $ 4,701 14.0x $ 6,928 4,017 $ 3,797
DCF Range (Implied Enterprise Value) $ 3,223 $ 4,370 $ 47.98 $ 65.07
Equity Value (a) Target price $56.52Implied Price per Share (b)
–
––––
–
Conservative EV/EBITDA
multiple of 12x
WACC123456789
101112131415161718192021
P Q RWACC CalculationsDebt+Equity 2,370.111. Debt componentLong tern debt 303.681Short-term debt 239.03Total debt 542.711Pre-tax cost of LT debt 8.51%Pre-tax cost of ST debt 3.92%Weight (LT) 55.96%Weight (ST) 44.04%Pre-tax cost of total debt 6.49%Effective tax rate 30.00%After tax cost of debt 4.54%2. Equity componentMarket capitalization 1,827.40Risk free rate (Tbonds10yr) 3.83%Beta (raw) 0.815Beta adjusted 0.876Market risk premium 0.08Cost of equity 10.99%WACC 9.51%
• Pre-tax cost of LT debt: yield to maturity on the most junior debt issued in Nov, 2007
• Beta: CRL vs S&P 600 for 2 year period
Comparable Company Analysis
Market Profile
52-Week Price Range $19.92-$69.19
Average Daily Volume 1,378,590
Dividend Yield (Est.) N/A
Shares Outstanding 67,167,000
Market Capitalization 1.69B
Institutional Holdings N/A
Insider Holdings 15%
Book Value per Share 28.71
Debt to Total Capital 0.218
Return on Equity 9.55%
Historical P/E
Jun-01-2000 Jun-01-2001 Jun-01-2002 Jun-01-2003 Jun-01-2004 Jun-01-2005 Jun-01-2006 Jun-01-2007 Jun-01-200810.00x
20.00x
30.00x
40.00x
50.00x
60.00x
CRL is trading at historically-low levels
Sector Breakdown
Healthcare Sector $2,230 billion
Life Sciences Tools & Services Sub-Sector $50 billion (2.2%)
Outsourced Drug Development Services and Tools Industry $19 billion (38%)
Early Drug Development Outsourcing $4.65 billion (24.5%)
Outsourcing• Higher cost of introducing a new drug
- Stringent FDA regulations- 70% increase in # of clinical studies since 2000- In 2007, FDA approved 19 new drugs, the fewest in
24 years• Outsourcing Represents an Efficient
Alternative to In-House Drug Development▫ 4-5 months time savings translated into $120-150
million in incremental prescription revenue per drug
13.49%
14.05%
14.58%14.88%
15.37%15.21%
16.03%16.40%
16.12%
13%
14%
14%
15%
15%
16%
16%
17%
17%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Average R&D/Sales of 12 Largest Pharmaceutical Companies
Specialist-Driven Products
• Specialty therapy sales are expected to grow 15% in 2008, compared to 6% for the global pharma market
• 80% of new drugs introduced in 2008 are expected to be specialist-driven
• Sales of oncology drugs are expected to account for 17% of projected market growth
Emerging Markets
Research Models Business
Estimated Market Size $1.2 billion
Preclinical Services Business
Estimated Market Size $ 3.5 billion
Competitor FinancialsRevenue Growth Ticker 2004 2005 2006 2007 5YR CAGRCharles River Labs CRL 18.0% 37.2% 6.6% 16.3% 17.3%Covance CVD 16.4% 17.4% 12.6% 22.9% 16.2%MDS MDZ -24.4% 26.9% 6.4% 0.9% 4.1%Life Sciences Research LSR 19.0% 9.1% 11.7% 23.2% 15.4%Industry 4.0% 27.0% 8.4% 15.0% 13.4%
Operating Margin Ticker 2004 2005 2006 2007 5 YR MedianCharles River Labs CRL 21.8% 18.6% 17.8% 18.5% 18.6%Covance CVD 23.3% 24.9% 24.3% 25.2% 24.3%MDS MDZ 0.2% -12.1% -9.8% -21.5% -9.8%Life Sciences Research LSR 10.0% 12.2% 5.0% 13.5% 10.0%Industry 16.1% 12.5% 12.1% 11.8% 12.5%
SensitivitiesPerpetuity EBITDA Combined
Base Case 56.52 42.13 49.33
2% 50.72 30.47 40.594% 45.57 23.17 34.376% 41.01 18.21 29.61
2% 56.09 41.09 48.594% 55.66 40.08 47.876% 55.23 39.12 47.18
-10% 56.24 41.85 49.04-30% 55.67 41.27 48.47-50% 55.09 40.7 47.9
-10% 50.08 37.13 43.6-20% 43.63 32.12 37.87-30% 37.18 27.11 32.15
- 100 basis points 53.7 40 46.85 - 300 basis points 48.36 35.97 42.17 - 500 basis points 43.42 32.23 37.82
- 200 basis points 52.69 39.23 45.96 - 400 basis points 48.86 36.33 42.6 - 600 basis points 45.03 33.43 39.23
- 200 basis points 51.65 38.34 45 - 400 basis points 46.78 34.55 40.66 - 600 basis points 41.9 30.76 36.33
Pre-clinical & Phase I services Market Share
CRL RMS Market Share
WACC
LIBOR
2009 Revenue Growth
2009-2013 Revenue Growth
2009-2013 Therapeutics R&D Growth
Biotech Funding• Since 2007, the growth in biotech R&D
spending has declined to 16% in 2007. • In 2007, for 8 largest biotech companies, the
amount of long-term debt increased only by 8% compared to 21% and 39% in 2004-2005
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
in m
illio
ns
Growth in R&D Spending by 8 Largest Biotech Companies
R&D YOY Growth
Refocus on Late-StagePatent Expirations
Lost Market Share to Generics
Reprioritization on Late Stage
Drug Development
Study
Slippage
and Delays in Early Stage Outsourcing
Company 2006 Sales (Bil $)
Janssen 2544Merck 1971Abbott 769Pfizer 1457
GlaxoSmithKline 327Novartis 3590
Orth-McNeil 1822Eisai 1296
GlaxoSmithKline 1207
ZyrtecDepakote
AcipHexImitrex
TopamaxRevacidRequip
2009
RisperdalFosamax
2008
Major Potential Patent Expirations (2008-2009)Brand Name
Gross Margin Graph
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 201325.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Research models and services Preclinical services