braddock road (route 620) and pleasant valley road (route ... · final or estimated contract value...

Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection ImprovementA Design-Build ProjectFairfax County, Virginia

From: 0.168 miles west of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)To: 0.076 miles east of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)

Proposal SubmittalLetter of Submittal and Attachments

State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501Federal Project No.: STP-5A01 (382)

Contract ID Number: C00103318DB71

Proposal Submitted By:

& April 24, 2014

Section 4.1Letter of Submittal

Section 4.2Attachments to Letter of Submittal

Section 4.2.1Affiliated/Subsidiary Companies List

Section 4.2.2Certification Regarding Debarment Forms

Attachment 4.2.2 (a)Attachment 4.2.2 (b)

Section 4.2.3VDOT Prequalification Certificate

Section 4.2.4Surety Letter

Section 4.2.5License & Registration Information

Section 4.2.6Work History Forms

Attachment 4.2.6 (a)Attachment 4.2.6 (b)

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design

consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

Name: Intercounty Connector Contract A Location: Montgomery County, MD

Name: Parsons Transportation Group

Name of Client./ Owner: Maryland SHA Phone: 410.677.4000 Project Manager: Melinda Peters Phone: 410-545-0400 Email: [email protected]

8/2010 12/2010 $464,000 464,000 $102,107

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Contract A of the Intercounty Connector was a large design-build project in Montgomery County Maryland. ($464 million dollar design-build best value). Wagman was an equity member of a fully integrated construction joint venture, so we were joint and severable with each partner and financially responsible for the project. The project was 8.5 miles long with 18 structures, 350,000 sf of noise walls, utility relocations, ROW acquisition, environmental permitting and monitoring, drainage, over 3 million cubic yard of excavation, and construction of 4 interchanges. On the western end of the project we had 1.5 miles of existing I-370 to widen and reconstruct. I-370 was widened to the median to create an additional lane and 8 existing structures were widened to the median. After the bridges were widened we placed a latex concrete overlay. Wagman performed this work, since we are the largest latex modified concrete supplier in the mid-Atlantic region. The interface of I-370 and the new ICC required us to widen to the median and to the outside and reconstruct 4 additional structures to accommodate new ramps for the new interchange. Major traffic control and traffic switches were required on the western end to minimize impacts to the travelling public. The project included extensive ITS and signalization within the project limits and beyond the project limits to inform the motorists and maintain traffic flow. Many innovative ideas were utilized to reduce cost and minimize impacts to the environment, such as open-bottom culverts, underground storm-water management structures to reduce thermal impact to adjacent streams, redesign of the interchange with existing I-370 and the MAR access road to eliminate structures and reduce the quantity of retaining walls. KCI was involved in structure design, roadway design and environmental clearance. As a Joint Venture Partner, Wagman was responsible for the design and construction of the entire project. We utilized the ATC Process to redesign a three level interchange into a 2 level trumpet interchange reducing bid cost, but also reducing long term maintenance costs for the owner. A Complete Traffic Management Plan was developed for the project that included all phases of construction and project completion. Context Sensitive Design was incorporated to ensure compliance with the aesthetic requirements and the projects commitment check list. Wagman personnel held key positions such as General Roadway Superintendent, General Structure’s superintendent, Pile Driving Manager, Design Coordination Assistant Manager, E&S Superintendent, and various construction field engineers and field employees. The project utilized three dimensional modeling to assist with survey and earth moving operations. We were able to adjust the vertical and horizontal alignment to eliminate excess excavated material Verifiable Evidence of Performance

2012 National Design-Build Award 2012 Exemplary Ecosystem Initiatives Award 2012 America’s Transportation Awards Top 10 Finalist 2012 ARTBA Globe Award for Environmental Excellence 2011 Northeast’s Region Best Overall Project 2011 President’s Award for highways

Lessons Learned Environmental Compliance Maintenance & Protection of Traffic

Similar Scope Elements to Braddock Road project Environmental Compliance X Geotechnical Challenges X Work within environmentally sensitive areas X Maintenance of Traffic X

Design-Build X Major Existing Utilities X Earthwork, Drainage & Paving X

mailto:[email protected]

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)











Name: Salisbury Bypass Phase II – Wicomico River Bridge Location: Salisbury MD

Name: Whitney Baily Cox and Magnami

Name of Client./ Owner: Maryland SHA Phone: 410.677.4000 Project Manager: Donnie Drewer Phone: 410.677.4006 Email: [email protected]

10/14/02 10/14/02 $6,681 $6,665 $6,665

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Wagman constructed the bridge structures on the Salisbury Bypass Phase 2. The main structure was s dual bridge across the Wicomico river in Salisbury MD. Due to environmental impacts the new bridges were to be constructed from a trestle bridge. All pile driving, substructure concrete, beam erection and deck placement was completed from the temporary bridge. Wagman was responsible for the design and construction of the temporary structure. During planning for bridge construction we identified that the original design created a large environmental impact to the wetlands and Wicomico floodplain. Through a partnership with Maryland SHA and the local district we proposed the re-design the bridge structure to lengthen the bridge and get the bridge abutments outside of the floodplains. Maryland SHA responded favorably to our proposition and we worked together to re-design the bridge and eliminate or minimize impacts to the flood plain and wetlands. The Army Corps of Engineers awarded the project an environmental award for the effort. This project also received the Maryland Quality Initiative award for best Large Project. The Wicomico River is a slow moving with a deep channel but wide floodplains, because the river overflows its banks with any major storm event.

Lessons Learned Driving 24-inch pile Environmental permit modifications to minimize impacts Limited access for construction High water fluctuation due to storm events

Similar Scope Elements to Braddock Road project Environmental Compliance X Geotechnical Challenges X Work within environmentally sensitive areas X

DB Coordination on bridge re-design X Permit modification to minimize environmental impacts

X

mailto:[email protected]

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)











Name: Route 604 Improvements Location: Chesterfield County, VA

Name: Virginia DOT

Name of Client./ Owner: Virginia DOT Phone: 800-367-7623 Project Manager: Chris Winstead, P.E. Phone: 804-674-2800 Email: christopher.winstead@vdot

Nov. 2003 Nov. 2003 8,100 8,100 8,100

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. The route 604 Improvement Project was awarded to Key Construction Co., Inc. (Acquired by G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc.) by VDOT. The Contractor’s responsibilities included grading, drainage, curb and gutter, utilities, paving, guardrail, striping, signals, landscaping and a new bridge across Route 288. Included within the project was the reconstruction of two major signalized intersections with extended connection construction. These reconstructed intersections included the intersection of Genito/Warbro Road and Genito/Old Hundred Road. D.W. Lyle Corporation was subcontracted to provide bridge construction and worked diligently to successfully meet the schedule for the project. In addition to high volume traffic, complicating factors encountered during construction included numerous utility conflicts and a temporary project shutdown due to a VDOT funding crises. Despite these factors, the project was finished ahead of schedule and earned an early completion incentive bonus. Both Key Construction Co., Inc. and D.W. Lyle Corporation were acquired by G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc. in 2013. The acquisitions were part of a strategic venture to supplement our construction abilities in Virginia and other Southern States. G.A. & F.C. Wagman have retained the key personnel from these acquisitions and utilize their experience to strengthen G.A. & F.C. Wagman’s overall capabilities. G.A. & F.C. Wagman is justified in utilizing a Key Construction Co. past project to satisfy the relevant project experience on this project due to the retention of the acquired firms’ personnel and resources. The past experience of the acquired firms with VDOT combined with G.A. & F.C. Wagman’s past experience with VDOT along with the combined resources will promote a successful completion of this project. Before Construction After Construction

Similar Scope Elements to Braddock Road project Utility Relocations X Geotechnical Challenges X High Traffic Volume X Earthwork X Asphalt Paving X Intersection Work & Related MOT X Curbs/Concrete Flatwork X

ATTACHMENT 3.4.1(b) LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM


a. Project Name & Location b. Narrative describing nature of Firm’s Responsibilities

c. Client/Owner/Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities. Include address and current phone number



f. Contract Value (in Thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. (in thousands)

Contract Value (Original)

Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

Mowatt Lane Roundabout College Park, Maryland

Design of Roadway Improvements and Roundabout

Owner: University of Maryland, College Park 1301 Service Building College Park, MD 20742 Bill Olen: (301) 405-7336

Contractor: OPUS East, LLC 2099 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 David Coleman: (973) 753-3500 (now with Skanska USA)

2004 2004 $2,200 $2,180 $175

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.

AMT provided comprehensive planning and design for the widening and construction of Mowatt Lane from Campus Drive to Knox Road, including the construction of an intersection roundabout located on the campus of the University of Maryland, College Park. Services provided include background and data collection, engineering alignment development, client coordination, surveying, preliminary and final design, storm drain design, utility relocation coordination, permitting, landscaping, lighting, Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), signing and striping, and erosion and sediment (E/S) control. Specific project components included:

Alignment Development – Developed roadway options including horizontal alignment, vertical alignment to minimize pavement excavation, and typical section segments including landscape strip, lane widths, and closed section. AMT minimized impacts to the natural environment and surrounding buildings by developing an alignment that would fit within an existing right of way and coordinated with the University of Maryland and City of College Park to design an alignment to meet their desired needs and Master Plan.

Roundabout Design – A traffic analysis was conducted to determine the appropriate traffic control, and a roundabout design was recommended and constructed. Design of the roundabout followed the FHWA Roundabouts Informational Guide for a single lane roundabout and adhered to AASHTO and SHA design criteria.

Drainage Design and Stormwater Management – Prepared drainage area map; determined adequacy of existing facilities, location/size of proposed inlets and culverts for a closed system; and designed required outfall protection. Met significant SWM quantity and quality control requirements through bioretention and CPV design.

Lighting – Aesthetically pleasing lighting was provided to accommodate vehicular/pedestrian traffic.

Maintenance of Traffic – Extensive MOT and phasing was required to accommodate pedestrian safety, and maintain a minimum one lane of traffic in each direction.

Utility Relocations – Required relocation of utility poles through PEPCO. Early coordination was provided with the utility company to provide time in the schedule for the design of the relocation and the construction.

Signing and Striping – Signing was critical to ensure pedestrian safety. Pavement markings at the pedestrian crosswalks were developed to provide high visibility for student crossings.

Surveying – Conducted in-house topographic survey to establish base mapping for subsequent design. Recovered buried utility data identified by Miss Utility and identified all topographic elements. Conducted property research to identify ROW lines.

Permitting – Expedited permitting was utilized for MDE/USACE joint permitting for wetlands adjacent to the project. E/S control approval was coordinated through Prince George’s County. Prepared Forest Conservation Plan, coordinating with MDNR until the permit was granted..

Project Features

Roundabout design and associated traffic analyses

3,000 feet of roadway improvements

Extensive utility relocations

Lead Contractor: OPUS East, LLC

Scope and Complexity Similarities

Roundabout design and roadway improvements

Combination of state and federal funding

High sensitivity to maintenance of traffic and safety during construction

Evidence of Good Performance The project was completed on time, within budget, safely and without any unusual traffic situations.

Challenges & Solutions

Providing adequate pedestrian access with limited right-of-way and off-roadway obstructions –narrow road through lanes to accommodate adequate sidewalk width

Providing adequate geometrics for roundabout with limited right of way – AMT used the design standards for an urban single lane roundabout that uses a 120 ft diameter inscribed circle to have the appropriate turning radius and safety features.

Maintain traffic during construction – AMT prepared MOT plans that used 4 phases of construction to allow for 2 directions of travel at all times through the intersection in order to construct the roundabout and not create traffic delays. Provided for construction time frames that would limit traffic during peak periods.










Route 7 Improvements Loudoun County, Virginia

Design of Roadway & Intersection Improvements and Safety Measures

Owner: Loudoun County / VDOT 1 Harrison Street, SE Leesburg, Virginia 20177 Ron Mallory: (703) 737-8398 James Zeller, PE: (703) 737-2014

Contractor: General Excavation, Inc. 9757 Rider Road Warrenton, VA 20187 Dwayne Miller: (540) 439-2202

2013 2013 $3,700 $3,700 $510


AMT provided transportation design, traffic engineering, surveying and construction phase services for the Route 7 Improvements project involving roadway widening and improvements to six intersections. More specifically, AMT provided the following services:

Geometrics – Widening of the existing facilities to include the expansion and addition of both right and left turn lanes as well as expanding intersections to allow for multi left turn lanes at several intersections. Work includes modifying median noses for turning radii.

Drainage – Modifications to accommodate the widened roadway involved ditch, inlet, storm drain, and culvert design as well as watershed modeling. Designed bioretention basins to manage the increases in runoff for stormwater management. Prepared E&S Control plans.

Landscaping – Prepared landscaping plans for community gateways as well as the proposed bioretention basins.

Traffic Data Collection – Collected traffic data including peak-hour turning movement counts at all major intersections along the Route 7 corridor during the AM, mid-day, and PM peak-hours. Field observations included the identification of peak hour queues and bottlenecks, their location, and approximate reason for their occurrence.

Traffic Analysis – Studied existing and future traffic conditions based on existing signal timing/phasing to identify operational deficiencies. Synchro/SimTraffic modeling simulations were developed for existing and future conditions to determine the levels of services, delays, travel times, and queues at each signalized intersection.

Signal Design and Optimization – New traffic signal poles and related infrastructure were designed where widening impacted the existing poles. Other signals were modified to accommodate the new turn lane configurations. The existing signal-system was optimized and re-timed as necessary to obtain the most efficient cycle lengths during the AM, mid-day, and PM peak periods, as well as examine the splits, phasing, offsets, and clearance intervals throughout the coordinated corridor based on ITE guidelines.

Traffic Control Plans – Prepared traffic control plans in accordance with VDOT and MUTCD requirements including phased sequence, barrier service, temporary signs and drums.

Survey, Utility Designation, and ROW – Providing topographic survey, utility designation and test pits for improvement areas throughout the corridor. Also preparing ROW plats.

Project Features

Traffic analysis and improvement design for six intersections

1.1 miles of roadway and safety improvements

Lead Contractor: General Excavation, Inc.


Intersection analyses and design improvements

Similarly sized project - $3.7 million

VDOT standards and approval

Sensitivity to maintenance of traffic and safety during construction



Providing additional lanes with limited right-of-way and off-roadway obstructions – AMT proposed widening into the existing bifurcated median and shifting through traffic into the newly developed median lanes to provide the required right turn lane additions.

Providing stormwater management for all proposed improvements without acquiring right-of-way – AMT provided the design for a series of low-impact design bio-filtration basins in the median. The grades of the bifurcated median limited available space for the proposed basins requiring a more complex series of basins that were smaller in size. Basins were then integrated into the median landscaping for more aesthetic appeal.

Avoiding utility conflicts in the median – AMT took a non-standard approach to the typical shoulder design and proposed a closed drainage system where needed, pulling culverts and ditch lines away from the center of the median where the existing utilities were concentrated.










Route 80 Buchanan and Dickenson Counties, Virginia

Roadway Design and Traffic Engineering

Owner: Virginia Department of Transportation 870 Bonham Road Bristol, VA 24201 Amanda Cox, PMP: (276) 669-6151

Contractor: Bizzack Construction, LLC 2257 Executive Drive Lexington, KY 40505 Stewart Gaither, PE: (859) 299-8001

2013 2013 $4,200 $4,200 $620


AMT provided all highway design, hydraulic design, utility relocation plans, right-of-way plans, stormwater management plans, transportation management plan (TMP), and erosion and sedimentation control plans for a two lane collector roadway as well as the associated connections and improvements to three local roadways. Included within the scope of the project is 0.56 miles of roadway tying into existing Route 80, relocation of existing Route 693, relocation of existing Route 768, relocation of existing Route 609, a new connection of proposed Route 768 with proposed Route 609, and a 300 foot long bulb-T girder bridge crossing Hunt’s Creek and Route 768.

The stormwater management for the project is being controlled primarily through the implementation of one primary basin controlling the majority of the project runoff. The erosion and siltation control is being handled by smaller basins throughout the project site as well as sediment traps and other control measures.

A major challenge with the project was the development of a functional maintenance of traffic plan as a subset of the overall Transportation Management Plan. The relocation of Route 693, Route 768, and Route 609 in conjunction with the construction of a new bridge including overhead work above Route 768 presented numerous challenges with regard to maintenance of traffic. The tie-ins to the existing routes required the development of two and three phase plans in order to route the traffic through and around the work zone. In one case, a temporary detour road was designed within the project environmental footprint to bypass traffic around the work zone.

AMT was also responsible for developing the project QA/QC Plan, including both the design and construction portions of the document. AMT has provided detailed design schedule information for inclusion into the Baseline Schedule and is participating in regular project meetings with VDOT officials. AMT provided construction inspection services and project documentation.

Project Features

Roadway design

Hydraulics and stormwater management plans

Maintenance of Traffic

Lead Contractor: Bizzack Construction, LLC


Roadway design

VDOT project

Similarly sized project - $4.2 million

Combination of state and federal funding

High sensitivity to maintenance of traffic and safety during construction



Development of a functional maintenance of traffic plan – AMT developed a temporary detour road, designed within the project environmental footprint, to bypass traffic around the work zone.

Utility accommodations – AMT minimized utility conflicts by adjusting geometrics and working closely with the utility companies to partner in the accommodations.

Environmental impact optimization – AMT adjusted geometric features to minimize impacts to environmental features and optimize permit issuance.

Section 4.2.7Conceptual Roadway Plans

NOTES

CP-

IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.

LEGEND

Mill & Overlay Pavment

Proposed Drainage Features

Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

SCALE

Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments

Fairfax County, Virginia

State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501

Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71

6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.

Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.

St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.

St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.

St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.

St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.

12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.

Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.

10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron

9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder

8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.

7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.

WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED.

THIS PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, 2009 MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENT TO

AMENDED BY CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC

PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY.

THE MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND AS

DEPARTMENT’S 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, 2008 ROAD

STATE

PROJECT

NO.

SECTIONEQUALITIES

FEET

LENGTH INCLUDINGFEDERAL AID

PROJECT NO.FEET FEETMILES MILES

LENGTH EXCLUDINGTYPE

PROJECTDESCRIPTIONBRIDGE(S) BRIDGE(S)TYPE

CODE

UPC

NO.

NONEPENG.

3 4

5B

5D

Project Lengths are based on Construction Baseline

ALL CURVES ARE TO BE SUPERELEVATED, TRANSITIONED AND

5

103318STP-5A01 (382)

0620-0

29-0

17

0 200’ 400’

SCALEDESCRIPTION REFERENCE

0.200

6

Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)

(US Route 50)

To Lee Jackson Memorial Hwy

(US Route 29)

To Lee Hwy(U

S

Route 15)

To Ja

mes

Monroe H

wy

Fairfax County Population 1,081,726 (2010 Census)

WIDENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD TC5.11 ULS, EXCEPT

STA. 100+50

.00Begin Pr

oject

STA. 113+39.3

6End Pro

ject

PRELIMINARY1056.361056.36 0.200

End ConstructionBegin Construction

STA. 205+14.78

Braddock Road (R

oute 620)

(US

Route 66)

To Curtis

Me

morial P

kwy

200

205

215

220

225

110

115

105

100

210

STP-5A01 (382) 103318 NONE 1056.36 0.200 1056.36 0.200 RIGHT OF WAYRW-201 ROWA

FROM: 0.168 MI. WEST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)

TO: 0.076 MI. EAST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)

TO: 0.076 MI. EAST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)

FROM: 0.168 MI. WEST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)

PR

OJE

CT: 0

620-0

29-0

17, P-10

1, RW-2

01

P-101

STA. 229+85.27

WAGMAN DESIGN-BUILD TEAM CONCEPT PLANS

1

ROUTE 609

INT. OF ROUTE 620 &

POI STA. 109+37.27 RTE. 609

TO: 0.076 MI. EAST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD)

FROM: 0.168 MI. WEST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD)

ROUTE 620 (BRADDOCK ROAD)

FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA

TYPICAL SECTIONS

2%

Center Point of Island

BL

Point of Finished Grade

2:12%2% 2%

1’ MIN

2%

2:1

to to

to to

Varies 13’ - 49’ 2.5’Varies 13’ to 18’2.5’

ROUTE 609

Sta 221+67

Sta 222+67 Sta 226+00

Sta 108+04 Sta 108+87

Sta 109+87 Sta 112+00

ROUTE 620

BL

Point of Finished Grade

2:12%

1’ MIN

Varies 9’ - 19’ 2.5’ 10’2.5’10’

Match Exist. Slope

Varies 9’ to 24’

Varies Varies1’ MIN

2%Match Exist. Slope

to to

to to

ROUTE 609

Sta 102+07 Sta 108+04

Sta 112+00

ROUTE 620

Sta 226+00

2:1

St’d. UD-4 Underdrain

St’d. UD-4 UnderdrainSt’d. UD-4 Underdrain

with CG-2 Face

St’d. MS-1A Median

Curb & Gutter

St’d. CG-6

Curb & Gutter

St’d. CG-6

Curb & Gutter

St’d. CG-6

Curb & Gutter

St’d. CG-6

5%

10’

2’

8’ Paved Shoulder

Underdrain

St’d. UD-4

2:1

SHOULDER SECTION LEFT

6’

5%

10’

2’

8’ Paved Shoulder

Underdrain

St’d. UD-4

2:1

6’

ROUTE 609 ROUTE 620

to toSta 227+34 Sta 110+94 Sta 113+39Sta 224+89

SHOULDER SECTION RIGHT

ROUTE 609

to toSta 219+68 Sta 110+94Sta 217+23

ROUTE 620

Sta 113+39

2% 2%

2:1

2.5’ 10’

5’4’


Curb & Gutter

St’d. CG-6

15’30’

1’

Apron

5’ Truck


Conc. Sidewalk

St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement

Conc. Sidewalk


Conc. Sidewalk


2%

ROUNDABOUT TYPICAL

2%2%

2:1

2.5’10’

5’ 4’


Curb & Gutter

St’d. CG-6

15’ 30’

1’

Apron

5’ Truck


Conc. Sidewalk


100’

3% 3%

St’d. CG-2 Curb

St’d. CG-2 Curb

ROUNDABOUT APPROACH OVERLAY AND WIDENING

2:1

TYPICAL OUTFALL DITCH SECTION

2:1

(See Detail This Sheet)

Mod. CG-3 Curb(See Detail This Sheet)

Mod. CG-3 Curb

Underdrain

St’d. UD-4

1’ In Accordance with WP-2

Saw-Cut Exist. Pavement

Type I, No. 21B

Base Material,

4" AggregateType I, No. 21B

Base Material,

4" Aggregate

Sta 217+22.66

Sta 227+33.79 Sta 113+39.36

Sta 219+71.62

Sta 219+71.62

Type I, No. 21B

Base Material,

4" Aggregate

Type I, No. 21B

Base Material,

4" Aggregate

ROUNDABOUT APPROACH NEW PAVEMENT

10’

4’ 5’

2:12:1

10’ & Var.

16’ Clear Zone

10.5’ Lateral Offset

35 MPH


35 MPH


35 MPH


35 MPH

35 MPH

16’ Clear Zone

35 MPH


35 MPH


35 MPH

Exist. Pavement 18’ - 22’

Roundabout To Be Landscaped

Inner Circle Of

Asphalt

Stone

8’

PATH CONNECTOR

ALTERNATE ASPHALT

Sta 221+50 Rt.


2

St’d. EC-2 Lining Req’d.

V-Ditch Sta. 208+00 to Sta. 219+75

4’ Min. Depth

Str. 3-1 to Sta. 208+00

Flat Bottom Ditch Req’d.

Depth 2.5’ & Var.

2

1

3

4

5

PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES

Notes:

in splitter islands)(3) Minimum widths are 15’ (face of curb to face of curb

(4) Roundabout should accommodate through movement for a WB-62 vehicle

year as determined by VDOT(1) The design year for this project is viewed as an interim design

directions (N,E,S,W) away from the intersection(2) The minmum lane widths will tie into existing 9’ wide lanes in all

4:1 Min. 4:1 Min.

SURFACE - 1.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE SM-9.5D @ 182 LBS/SQ YD

INTERMEDIATE - 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE IM-19.0A @ 244 LBS/SQ YD

BASE - 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE BM-25.0A

beneath the paved shoulder.

connected to a standard UD-4 edgedrain beneath the curb and gutter or SUBBASE NO. 1 - 6" AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL, TYPE I SIZE NO. 21B,

the edge of pavement

pugmill mixed with a 4% hydrualic cement by weight extended 12" beyond SUBBASE NO. 2 - 18" AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL, TYPE I SIZE NO. 21A

CG-3 MODIFIED

NOTES:

AS STANDARD CG-3.

HEIGHT OF THE CURB AS SHOWN. MODIFIED CURB SHALL BE PAID FOR

4. THE MODIFICATION TO THE STANDARD CG-3 IS TO REDUCE THE EXPOSED

IN DEPTH.

IN THE PRICE BID IS TO BE MADE FOR A DECREASE OR AN INCREASE

OTHERWISE, THE DEPTH IS TO BE 16" AS SHOWN. NO ADJUSTMENT

WITH THE TOP OF A COURSE OF THE PAVEMENTS SUBSTRUCTURE.

IN ORDER THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE CURB WILL COINCIDE

(13" DEPTH) OR INCREASED AS MUCH AS 3" (19" DEPTH)

3. THE DEPTH OF CURB MAY BE REDUCED AS MUCH AS 3"

IF PRECAST.

2. CONCRETE TO BE CLASS A3 IF CAST IN PLACE, 4000 PSI

1. THIS ITEM MAY BE PRECAST OR CAST IN PLACE.

2" 5"

2" 3"

SURFACE

BASE

SUBBASE

7" N.T.S

SE

E

NO

TE 3

(16") 1’ 4"

2" R

1" R

FOR USE ON ROUNDABOUT TRUCK APRONS ONLY

NOT TO SCALE

12

3

45

PAVEMENT SECTION

ADT (2012)

ADT (2020)(1)

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND TRAFFIC DATA

CLASSIFICATION

FUNCTIONAL

TC STD.

GEOMETRIC STD. GS-6

8,800

7,525

FROM:

TO:

Roundabout Design Vehicle

MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE

MIN. LANE WIDTH

Urban Minor Arterial

35 MPHDESIGN SPEED (MPH)

16’-6"

11’ (2)(3)

TC-5.11 ULS

WB-40 (4)

GS-6

10,000

8,550

0.140 miles North of Route 6200.322 miles South of Rte. 620

Urban Minor Arterial

35 MPH

16’-6"

11’ (2)(3)

TC-5.11 ULS

WB-40 (4)

BRADDOCK ROAD

RTE 620

PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD

RTE 609

0.076 miles East of Route 6090.168 miles West of Rte. 609

5’ 4’

10’

1’ MINVaries3’-20’

NOTES

CP-


LEGEND



Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

SCALE

















Asphalt Sidewalk

Conc.

Head

wall

Conc. End

wall

Inv. =2

62.0

1’

Inv. =2

61.59’

In Pl. 3

0" C

M

Pip

e

Inv. =2

64.5

4’

Inv. =2

65.0

0’

In Pl. 4

5" x 29"

Conc. Pip

e

Inv. =2

64.5

2’

Inv. =2

64.9

5’

In Pl. 4

5" x 29"

Conc. Pip

e

Barbed Wire Fence

Barbed Wire Fence

Barbed Wire Fence

Woods

Rip

Rap

Inv. =2

64.9

6’

In Pl. 4

5" x 29"

Conc. Pip

eIn

v. =2

64.5

4’

155.29’(TIE)

(N26°31

’53"E

1380.06

’)

Z

PI 119+15.5

80

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

Conc.

Well

Vegetation

Planter W/

1’ W Stone4’ Woven Wire Fence

Existing 15’ Trail Esm’t

Per Plat DB12261 PG1801

Existing RWExisting RWExisting RW



Trav. #10

0

Asphalt Sidewalk

(N82°06’39"

W 122.10’)

Storm Drainage Easement


(N84

°13’29"

W 121.71’)

(N44°22’45"W 165.97’)

(S43°09’46"W 291.06’)

Prescriptive Esmt.

IPF

+32.01

4.55’

PL

171.07’(TIE)

(N61°48’4

5"W 12

3.75’)

Per Plat DB12261 PG1801Conservation Easement


Conservation Easement





13.8084 AC.

Tax# 043-1-01-0018-Z

COX-RICHARD FAMILY FARM LLLPDB21045 PG23

001

FAIRFAX CO PARK AUTHORITYDB12261 PG1801

146.1379 AC.

Tax# 043-3-04-A

Parcel "A"

005

NO

VE

C # 333436

NO

VE

C # 333435

NO

VE

C #333 434

3-1

3-2

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 4 -

ST

A. 210

+00.0

0

3

(703) 750 - 1000

Springfield, VA

6801 Industrial Road

Washington Gas

Gas:

Noah Dobbins (703) 464 - 7529

Herndon, Va 20171

2950 Towerview Rd. Suite 150

dba CenturyLink Government Programs

Qwest Government Services (QGS)

Wayne Haithcox (540) 522 - 3776

Herndon, VA 20170

950 Herndon Pkwy

FiberLight LLC (FBL)

Quincy Henderson (703) 480 - 7860

Herdon, VA 20171

3080 Centerville Rd.

Cox Cable

Dave Fisher (703) 350 - 8463

Reston, VA 20191

12379 Sunrise Valley Drive

Verizon Business

or (540) 520 - 1001

Rick Boswell (540) 829 - 2709

Ashburn, VA 20147

22001 Loudon County Pkwy

Verizon Va.

Telecomm:

(703) 754 - 6732

Gainesville, VA 20155

5399 Wellington Road

Northern Virginia Electric Coop.

Power:

Michael Jenkins (703) 698 - 5600

Fairfax, VA 22031

8570 Executive Park Ave

Fairfax Water Authority

Water:

Utility Owners List

Fairfax County, VA

Braddock Road

NOTES #

CP-


LEGEND

C

F


Demolition of Pavement

Construction Limits in Fills


Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

0

SCALE

25’ 50’





Denotes Proposed Truck Apron

Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path

Denotes Prop. V-Ditch













Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk

Construction Limits in Cuts

203

204

205

206

207

208

209L

BEGIN CONSTRUCTION

RTE 609 CONSTR. B

POT STA. 205+14.78

RTE. 609 CONSTR. BL

C

C

210

210

PROP. R/WCONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 4

A -

ST

A. 210

+00.0

0

3A

ROUTE 609 PROFILE

CP-






EXISTING GRADE

Existing Grade

BEGIN CONSTRUCTION

RTE 609 CONSTR. B

POT STA. 205+14.78

LPROPOSED GRADE

SPLINE GRADE

MILL & OVERLAY EXIST. PAVEMENT

SPLINE GRADE

+0.27%+0.18%265.6

0+0.33% +1.04% +1.12% +1.21% +1.21% +1.26% +1.05% +0.92% +1.35% +1.36% +1.36% +1.20% +1.19% +1.19% +1.09% +0.90%+1.01%

+0.86%

250_

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

203+00.00 204+00.00 205+00.00 206+00.00 207+00.00 208+00.00 209+00.00 210+00.00

266.4

2

266.2

7

266.15

266.0

3

265.9

3

265.8

1

265.7

5

265.6

8

265.6

0

265.6

1

265.6

8

265.7

6

266.0

2

266.3

0

266.6

0

266.9

1

267.2

2

267.4

8

267.7

1

268.0

5

268.3

9

268.7

3

269.0

3

269.3

3

269.6

3

269.9

0

270.15

270.3

7

270.5

9

265.7

6

265.6

1

265.6

8

266.0

2

266.3

0

266.6

0

266.9

1

267.2

2

267.4

8

267.7

1

268.0

5

268.3

9

268.7

3

269.0

3

269.3

3

269.6

3

269.9

0

270.15

270.3

7

270.5

9

250_

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

0 LF

5 LF

50 LF

SCALE

Barbed Wire Fence

Asphalt SidewalkAsphalt Sidewalk

15’ TRAIL ESM’T

Gravel Ent.

In Pl. 12" Plastic Pip

e

4’ Woven Wire Fence 4’ Woven Wire Fence 4’ Woven Wire Fence

Inv. In=

272.8

0’

Inv. O

ut= 2

72.5

0’

N 42° 34’ 46" E126

127

128

129

130

131

132

Existing RWExisting RW

Trav. #

101

Prescriptive Esmt.

(S43°17’37"W 1462.70’)

PL



(N43°30’47"E 1820.43’)

(S43°30’47"W 1290.58’)

( A=26.73’)

(R=192.50’)

( A=28.82’)

(R=207.50’)



NO

VE

C # 333437

NO

VE

C # 333432

Novec #4334111

13.8084 AC.

Tax# 043-1-01-0018-Z


001


146.1379 AC.

Tax# 043-3-04-A

Parcel "A"

005

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 3 -

ST

A. 210

+00.0

0

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5 -

ST

A. 217

+00.0

0

4

NOTES #

CP-


LEGEND

C

F





Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

0

SCALE

25’ 50’






















211

212

PC 212

+77.2

7

213

PT 213

+70.6

9

214

215

216

217

Curve RTE609-1

PI = 213+23.98

T = 46.71’

L = 93.42’

R = 10,000.00’

212+77.27PC =

PT = 213+70.69

RTE. 609 CONSTR. BL

1

1

V = > 35 MPH

NORMAL CROWN

210

210

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5

A -

ST

A. 217

+00.0

0

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 3

A -

ST

A. 210

+00.0

0

4A

ROUTE 609 PROFILE

CP-






EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

MILL & OVERLAY EXIST. PAVEMENT

SPLINE GRADE

+0.87%

+0.85%

+0.85% +0.67% +0.68% +0.74% +0.75% +0.72% +0.77% +0.77% +0.75% +0.85% +0.85% +0.84%+0.66% +0.52% +0.40% +0.40%

+0.66%+0.60%+0.48%+0.17%+0.36% +0.42% +0.43% +0.48% +0.51% +0.51%

250_

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

210+00.00 211+00.00 212+00.00 213+00.00 214+00.00 215+00.00 216+00.00 217+00.00

270.5

9

270.8

1

271.02

271.19

271.36

271.54

271.73

271.91

272.10

272.3

0

272.4

8

272.7

0

272.9

1

273.12

273.3

3

273.4

6

273.5

8

273.7

3

273.9

0

274.0

6

274.19

274.2

9

274.3

9

274.4

8

274.5

9

274.6

9

274.8

1

274.9

4

275.0

7

270.5

9

270.8

1

271.02

271.19

271.36

271.54

271.73

271.91

272.10

272.3

0

272.4

8

272.7

0

272.9

1

273.12

273.3

3

273.4

6

273.5

8

273.7

3

273.9

0

274.0

6

274.19

274.2

9

274.3

9

274.4

8

274.5

9

274.6

9

274.8

1

274.9

4

275.0

7

250_

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

0 LF

5 LF

50 LF

SCALE

PLGravel P

arking

Lot

Barbed Wire Fence

Split Rail Fence

Woven

Wire Fence

36" Oak

18" Cedar

30" Oak

1 - Sty. F

r. Buildin

g

1’ Stone

Wall Planter

Water Spigot

Water Spigot

Asphalt Sidewalk

Braddock Road - R

oute 620 - G

ravel

PLEASANT VALLEY RD - RTE. 609( Variable Width RW )

(S59°31’3

6"E 502.2

4’)

Z

(N51°58’4

8"W 615.0

1’)

S59°39’3

0"E

Existin

g R/

W Per D

B13

784 P

G183

Asp

halt Sidew

alk

Fr. S

hed

Fr. S

hed

Conc.

Patio

In Pl. 12" CM

Pipe

In Pl. 23" x 14" Conc. P

ipe

Chevron

Chevron

Chevr

on

ShedFr.

She

d

Fr.

Wood Cano

py

DeckWood.

Inv. In= 276.66’

Inv. Out= 276.54’

Inv. In= 276.3

6’

Inv. Out= 2

76.12’

Inv. Out= 276.22’

Inv. In= 276.46’

PI 13

6+8

6.8

70

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

Prescriptiv

e Es

mt.

Willow8" Weeping

Willow8" Weeping

Willow8" Weeping

16" Cedar

2- 1’ W Ston

e Planters

In Pl. 2

3" x 14" Conc. Pipe

Shoulder

Asphalt

Existing RW

Trav. #145

Asphalt Di

tch

(N55°14’0

0"W 12

22.2

0’)

DB13784 PG183

Existing R/W Per

(S51°16’12"W 251.29’)

( S2102

’40"W

17.90’ )

( A=42.16’)

(R=107.50’)



(S43°30’47"W 107.34’)(R=192.50

’)

(R=207.50’)

( A=24.51’)

( A=26.42’)

(S33°53’11"W 10

4.17’)

(S33°53’24"W

104.49’)

( A=63.67’)

(R=207.50’)

( A=59.07’)

(R=192.50’)

(S51°28’12"W 130.23’)

(S51°28’12"W 130.23’)

S59°4

2’4

6"E

(R=25.00’)

( A=33.91’)

Z





Woo

dCanop

y

1-Sty. Fr. B

arn

PG 1111)

(DB 23370

Easement

Ex. 5’ Utility

13.8084 AC.

Tax# 043-1-01-0018-Z


001

Tax# 043-1-01-0013-Z

3.6696 AC.


002


146.1379 AC.

Tax# 043-3-04-A

Parcel "A"

005

Tax# 043-1-01-0010

DB16486 PG838

67.2634 AC.

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY

004

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITYDB12604 PG550

39.763 AC.Tax# 043-1-01-0003-A

003

Novec #433412

0

NO

VE

C # 333412

1

NOVEC # 3334119

NOVEC # 3334118

NOVEC # 333

428

NOVEC

# 333

429

NO

VE

C # 333424

BA Telephone B

ox

Guy Pole

NOVEC #333 41 22

U/G FO B

ox

12 Guy Wires

2- FO M

arkers8 Guy Wires

LP NOVE

C # 3334123

(FB

L)

EOI

Elec.

Outlet

FO1

FO2

Elec. Outl

et

Elec. Outlet

Elec. OutletElec. Outlet

MATCHLINE SHEET 5B - STA. 107

+75.00

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 4 -

ST

A. 217

+00.0

0

MATCHLIN

E SHEET

5D - S

TA. 111+2

5.00

EXIST. RW

5

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 6 -

ST

A. 224+0

0.0

0

NOTES #

CP-


LEGEND

C

F





Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

0

SCALE

25’ 50’






















5-10

5-11

5-5

5-6

5-13

5-7A

5-9

5-3

5-4

5-17

5-12

5-14

5-7

5-2

5-8

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

15"

5-3A

42"

42"

36"

36"

15"

5-10A

5-15

5-16

PROP. R/W PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

PR

OP. R/

W

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

EASEMENT

CONSTR.

PROP. TEMP.

108

PC 108+54.13

PT 108+94.58

109

PC 109+44.29

110

PT 110+

21.52

PC 111+2

0.73

PC 217

+48.13

218

219

PT 219

+72.6

6

220

PC 220+2

8.16

221

PRC 221+1

4.83

PT 221+7

6.4

2

222

223

PRC 223+04.23

PT 224+2

1.02

Curve RTE620-9

PI = 108+74.40

T = 20.27’

L = 40.45’

R = 251.00’

108+54.13PC =

PT = 108+94.58

Curve RTE609-5

PI = 222+87.89

T = 16.39’

L = 32.74’

R = 251.00’

222+71.49

223+04.23

PC =

PRC =

PI = 218+60.40

Curve RTE609-2

T = 112.27’

L = 224.53’

R = 10,000.00’

217+48.13PC =

PT = 219+72.66

Curve RTE609-3

PI = 220+71.93

T = 43.77’

L = 86.67’

R = 251.00’

220+28.16PC =

PRC =221+14.83

Curve RTE609-4

PI = 221+45.78

T = 30.95’

L = 61.59’

R = 251.00’

221+14.83PRC =

PT = 221+76.42

PI = 223+63.70

Curve RTE609-6

T = 59.47’

L = 116.79’

R = 251.00’

223+04.23PRC =

PT = 224+21.02

PC 222+71.49

221

PC 221+6

3.3

7

222

PT 22

2+21.

46

9

1

1

6

3

3

2

2

7

7

2

3

3

7

8

2

2

3

3

2

2

3

5

5

4

4

2

33

11

10

10

L

BEGIN PROJECT

RTE 609 CONSTR. B

POT STA. 217+22.66

LRTE. 609 CONSTR. B

13

3

4

2

5

9

2

5

9

10

3

4

13

LRTE. 609 AUX. CONSTR. B

CF

CF

217

111

L

LPOT 109+37.27 RTE. 620 CONSTR. B

= 87°52.33" RT.

PI 222+16.96 RTE. 609 CONSTR. B

6

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

V = > 45 MPH

NORMAL CROWNV = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

P0

T 220+2

8.16

Curve 609AUX-13

PI = 221+95.87

T = 32.50’

L = 58.09’

R = 52.00’

221+63.37PC =

PT = 222+21.46

6

Curve RTE620-3

PI = 109+83.21

T = 38.93’

L = 77.24’

R = 251.00’

109+44.29PC =

PT = 110+21.52

10

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

EXIST. CONC. PATIO

DO NOT DISTURB

FC

12

12

12

12

12

CF

FC

224

224

12’

12’

12’

12’

12’

12’

12’

12’

12’

15’

15’

30’5’

9

9

YIE

LD

YIELD

YI

EL

D

YIELD

ON

LY

ROUTE 609 PROFILE

ROUTE 620 PROFILE

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 6

A -

ST

A. 224+0

0.0

0

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 4

A -

ST

A. 217

+00.0

0

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5

C -

ST

A. 10

7+7

5.0

0

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5

E -

ST

A. 111+25.0

0

5ACP-






EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

PROPOSED GRADE

L

BEGIN PROJECT

RTE 609 CONSTR. B

POT STA. 217+22.66

SPLINE GRADE

MILL & OVERLAY EXIST. PAVEMENTSPLINE GRADE

+0.43%

275.2

5

+0.84% +0.49% +0.46% +0.50% +0.72%

V = 60 MPH

STA = 219+28.16

EL = 276.49

L = 100.00

K = 192

ex = -0.07’

SSD = 2122’

+0.22%

STA = 220+28.16

EL = 276.69

L = 100.00

K = 108

ex = 0.12’

V = 50 MPH

+1.13%

STA = 221+66.96

EL = 278.26

+2.00% -2.00%

STA = 222+16.96

EL = 279.26

STA = 222+66.96

EL = 278.26

+0.74%

ROUNDABOUT GRADEPROPOSED RAISED

EXISTING GRADE

+0.51%

217+00.00 218+00.00 219+00.00 220+00.00 221+00.00 222+00.00 223+00.00 224+00.00

275.0

7

275.19

275.3

1

275.4

4

275.5

6

275.6

7

275.8

0

275.9

4

276.11

276.2

2

276.3

2

276.4

1

276.5

1

276.5

6

276.6

1

276.7

1

276.8

2

276.4

9

277.12

277.2

0

277.2

0

277.7

2

277.3

2

277.8

9

277.9

4

277.7

6

277.7

4

278.0

8

278.2

5

275.0

7

275.19

275.5

6

275.3

5

275.6

8

275.8

0

275.9

2

276.10

276.2

7

276.4

1

276.5

1

276.5

8

276.6

6

276.7

9

276.9

8

277.2

2

277.5

1

277.7

9

278.0

7

278.4

2

278.9

2

279.10

278.6

0

278.3

2

278.5

1

278.6

9

278.8

7

279.0

6

279.2

4

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

108+00.00 109+00.00 110+00.00 111+00.00

278.7

1

278.4

9

278.3

8

278.2

8

278.12

277.7

6

277.3

4

277.6

3

278.0

0

277.7

4

277.8

7

278.0

8

278.4

0

278.7

7

278.9

0

278.8

3

278.6

3

278.5

2

278.4

2

278.3

2

278.5

2

279.0

2

279.0

1

278.5

1

278.3

5

278.4

9

278.6

3

278.7

7

278.9

1

279.0

4

PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADEEXISTING GRADE

-0.88% -0.44% -0.39% -0.43%

+2.00% -2.00%

STA = 108+87.27

EL = 278.26

STA = 109+37.27

EL = 279.26

STA = 109+87.27

EL = 278.26

+0.56%

ROUNDABOUT GRADEPROPOSED RAISED

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

295_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

295_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

0 LF

5 LF

50 LF

SCALE

PL

PL PL

Gravel Road

Gravel Road

4’ Split Rail Fence

Gravel Parking Lot

Row of Cedar Trees

Row of Trees and Brush

Braddock Road - Route 620 - Gravel

(S51°58’48"E 692.01’)(S

25°44’2

4"W 260.3

3’)

(N33°29’0

5"E 245.3

6’)

Per D

B 210

44 P

G873

Ex. 30’ Ingress-E

gress Esmt.

Gravel Parking Lot

1’ W Wooden Planter

2

Metal Posts

4’ Split Rail Fence

(S58°56’53"E 227.83’)

Prescriptive Esmt.

In Pl. 23" x 14" C

onc. Pipe

Ex. 5’ Utility Easement ( DB 23370 PG 1111)

( DB 23370 PG 1111)

Ex. 5’ Utility Easement

PLN25°3

9’13"E

(N25°44’2

4"E 15

5.9

5’)

N25°40’11"E

(S59°31’36"E 128.09’)

PL

(N51°58’48"W 615.01’)

Tax# 043-1-01-0013-Z

3.6696 AC.


002

CO

X-RIC

HA

RD

FA

MIL

Y F

AR

M

LLLP

FAIR

FA

X

CO

UN

TY P

AR

K

AU

TH

ORIT

YTax# 043-1-0

1-0003-A


39.763 AC.Tax# 043-1-01-0003-A

003

Tax# 043-1-01-0017-Z

AARON COX-RICHARD DB21044 PG873

5.0 AC.

NO

VE

C # 333416

NO

VE

C # 333415

4

Guy

Wires

NO

VE

C #3330410

17

Novec #3330410

07

(FBL)

Elec.

Outlet

Elec.

Outlet

Elec.

Outlet

Elec.

Outlet

Elec.

Outlet

Elec.

Outlet

Elec.

Outlet

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5 -

ST

A. 10

7+7

5.0

0

5B

NOTES #

CP-


LEGEND

C

F





Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

0

SCALE

25’ 50’






















5D-3

5D-1

5D-2

15"

15"

15"

101 103 104

PC 10

4+2

2.0

9

105

106

107

PT 10

7+2

8.7

8Curve RTE620-8

PI = 105+75.45

T = 153.36’

L = 306.69’

R = 10,000.00’

104+22.09

107+28.78

PC =

PT =

3

3

L

LPOT STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B

END CONSTRUCTION

STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B

LRTE. 620 CONSTR. B

8

8

BEGIN PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101

LE

NT

R. #1

CO

NS

TR.

B

CF

POT 10

9+3

7.2

7 R

TE. 620

CO

NS

TR.

B

=

87°52.3

3" R

T.

PI 222+16.9

6

RT

E. 609

CO

NS

TR.

B

V = > 45 MPH

NORMAL CROWN

POT 106+08.00 RTE. 620 CONSTR. B

L

L

= 90°00" RT.

PI 10+00.00 ENTR. #1 CONSTR. B

33

102


L

L

= 90°00" LT.


40’FC TO FC

POT 10+80.25

RE

Q’D., W

=40’

ST’D.

CG-11

AS

PH

ALT

EN

TR

AN

CE

EN

TR

AN

CE

RE

Q’D., W

=40’ (F

C

TO F

C)

ST’D. A

SP

HA

LT

CO

MM

ER

CIA

L

3

3

C

C F

F C

CC

12’

12’

12’

12’

12’

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

ENTRANCE RECONSTRUCTION

CONSTR. EASEMENT FOR

PROP. TEMPORARY

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

PROP. R/W

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

EAS

EM

EN

T

CO

NS

TR.

PR

OP. T

EM

P.

RTE. 620 PROFILE

ENTRANCE #1

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5

A -

ST

A. 10

7+7

5.0

0

300_

295_

290_

285_

280_

275_

270_

289.5

4

288.4

0

289.7

8

289.9

6

288.9

0

289.3

0

10+00.00

ENTRANCE #2

5CCP-






PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

L

L

BEGIN PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101

L

L

390’ SIGHT DISTANCE


EYE 3.5’

OBJECT 3.5’

POT STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B

END CONSTRUCTION


+0.82%

290.2

8

-2.18%

286.2

3

-2.62% -2.76% -2.76% -2.58% -2.51% -1.77% -1.58% -1.60% -1.31% -1.19%

106+0

8.0

0

RT

E. 620

CO

NS

TR.

B

10+0

0.0

0

EN

TR. #

1 C

ONS

TR.

B

-1.20%

10+0

0.0

0

EN

TR. #

2

CO

NS

TR.

B

101+62.4

4

RT

E. 620

CO

NS

TR.

B

-0.95% -0.92% -0.91% -0.88% -0.98% -0.92%

L

L

L

L

-1.93 %

-1.96 %-1.88 %

-1.88 %-1.80 %

-1.80 %

-1.64%-1.20 %

-1.30%

101+00.00 102+00.00 103+00.00 104+00.00 105+00.00 106+00.00 107+00.00

290.2

8

290.0

6

290.2

3

289.9

3

289.5

2

289.0

7

288.6

2

288.15

287.6

8

287.19

286.6

5

286.10

285.5

6

284.9

0

284.2

1

283.5

2

282.8

8

282.2

5

281.81

281.41

281.01

280.6

9

280.3

9

280.0

9

279.8

6

279.6

3

279.4

1

279.19

278.9

4

278.7

1

290.2

8

290.2

3

289.9

3

289.5

2

289.0

7

288.6

2

288.15

287.6

8

287.19

286.7

1

286.2

3

286.7

0

285.6

8

285.0

3

284.3

4

283.6

5

283.0

0

282.3

8

281.93

281.54

281.10

280.8

1

280.5

2

280.2

2

279.9

9

279.7

6

279.5

3

279.3

1

279.0

6

278.8

3

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

295_

300_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

280.2

9

281.05

281.06

280.4

2

280.7

8

10+00.00

EL = 280.27

STA = 10+12.09

+4.00%

-1.24%

EP

280.4

2

281.06

+0.05%

EN

D

CO

NS

TR.

STA = 10+31.64

EL = 281.05

L = 20.00

K = 5

ex = -0.10’

SSD = 284’

V = 15 MPH

290_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

295_

STA = 10+57.00

EL = 288.26

289.2

5

289.6

4

-33.3

3%

STA = 10+60.00

EL = 287.26

+33.3

3%-2.00%

0 LF

5 LF

50 LF

SCALE

PL

Woven Wire Fence

Barbed Wire Fence

4’ Chain Link Fence

Barbed Wire Fence

Woods

Cemetary

Braddock Road - Route 620

( Variable Width RW )

(N52°36’02"W 550.00’) (N52°36’02"W 16.48’)

(N52°36’02"W 214.74’)

Existing RWN59°03’17"W

N59°03’17"W

N59°03’17"W

(S58°45’56"E 1084.94’)Existing RW

Existing RWN58°49’39"WTrav. #12

Trav. #

11

Trav. #

13

Existing RW

Trav. #11

N58°59’37"W 214.74’

Trav. #13

IPF+44.50

561.78’ IPF+92.55

770.93’

PL

(S37°23’5

8"W 202.8

5’)

PL

+42.20

516.30’

S31°0

0’2

3"W

N31°00’2

3"E

(N37°2

3’5

8"E 202.8

5’)

PL

IPF


Conservation Easement Per Plat DB12261 PG1801


Per Plat

DB12

261 P

G18

01

Conservation Ease

ment

CATHOLIC CHURCH

DB4215 PG0256

1.0000 AC.

Tax# 043-1-01-0009

MOST REV T J WELSH

BISHOP OF ARLINGTON VA

Tax# 043-1-01-0010

DB16486 PG838

67.2634 AC.


004


146.1379 AC.

Tax# 043-3-04-A

Parcel "A"

005

NO

VE

C # 333425

NO

VE

C # 333429

NO

VE

C # 333426

NO

VE

C # 333427

U/

G F

O

Box

FO

Marker

FO

Marker

(FBL)

U/

G F

OH

H

FO1

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5 - S

TA. 111+2

5.0

0

5D

NOTES #

CP-


LEGEND

C

F





Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

0

SCALE

25’ 50’






















5F-1

5-1

15"

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

PC 111+20.7

3

112

PT 112

+43.8

8

113

114

115

116

117

118

9

9

L

LPOC STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B

END CONSTRUCTION


LRTE. 620 CONSTR. B

11

11

END PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101

C

F

V =

25

MP

H

NO

RM

AL C

RO

WN (U

LS)

V = 40 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

221+63.3

7222+2

1.46

Curve RTE620-11

PI = 111+82.38

T = 61.65’

L = 123.15’

R = 1,000.00’

111+20.73PC =

112+43.88PT =

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5

A -

ST

A. 111+25.0

0

RTE. 620 PROFILE

5ECP-






112+00.00 113+00.00 114+00.00 115+00.00 116+00.00

278.9

0

278.9

8

279.0

6

279.2

4

279.4

3

279.6

2

279.8

6

280.10

280.3

3

280.5

8

280.8

5

281.10

281.38

281.68

282.0

4

282.4

8

282.9

3

283.4

8

284.0

4

284.6

0

279.0

4

279.18

279.3

2

279.4

6

279.6

0

279.7

6

279.9

9

280.2

2

280.3

7

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

295_

300_

PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

LPOC STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B

END CONSTRUCTION

STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. BL

END PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101

+0.66%+0.94% +0.94% +0.61%

280.4

4

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

295_

300_

0 LF

5 LF

50 LF

SCALE

PL

Woods

Pleasant Valley Road - Route 609

( 30’ Prescritive RW )

PI 14

6+5

5.4

60

N 43° 58’ 46" E

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

(S49°00’00"W 729.47’)

(N51°07’04"E 1337.28’)

Prescriptive Esmt.

N44°40’00"E

(S41°0

0’0

0"E 437.0

5’)

PLS45°2

8’46"E

Tax# 043-1-01-0010

DB16486 PG838

67.2634 AC.


004



39.763 AC.Tax# 043-1-01-0003-A

003

NO

VE

C # 333423

NO

VE

C # 333424

NO

VE

C # 333422

BA Telephone B

ox

6

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5 -

ST

A. 224+0

0.0

0

NOTES #

CP-


LEGEND

C

F





Proposed Lighting

Full Depth Pavement

0

SCALE

25’ 50’






















6-16-1A

15"

15"

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

UTILITY EASMENT

VDOT JOINT-USE

PROP. PERMANENT

EASEMENT

CONSTR.

PROP. TEMP.

CONSTR. EASEMENT

PROP. TEMPORARY

PROP. R/W

PROP. R/W

PT 224+2

1.02

PC 224+9

5.6

7

225

226

PT 226+2

2.3

4

227

228

PO

T 228+6

7.0

6

Curve RTE609-7

PI = 225+59.33

T = 63.66’

L = 126.66’

R = 510.00’

224+95.67PC =

PT = 226+22.34

3

9

3

2

L

LRTE. 609 CONSTR. B

7

7

END CONSTRUCTION

RTE 609 CONSTR. B

POT STA. 229+85.27

F

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

V = 35 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

V = 25 MPH

NORMAL CROWN (ULS)

Curve R

TE620-11

PO

T 230+2

5.0

0

229

230

33


L

L

= 90°00" LT.


40’

FC TO FC

POT 10+82.20

EN

TR

AN

CE

RE

Q’D., W

=40’ (F

C

TO F

C)

ST’D. A

SP

HA

LT

CO

MM

ER

CIA

L

C

CF

FC

224

224

11’

11’

FF

MA

TC

HLIN

E

SH

EE

T 5

A -

ST

A. 224+0

0.0

0

RTE. 609 PROFILE

ENTRANCE #3

283.13

282.3

6

282.6

1

282.7

2

282.8

0

282.3

0

10+00.00

6ACP-






PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

EYE 3.5’


OBJECT 3.5’


L

L

END CONSTRUCTION

LRTE 609 CONSTR. B

POT STA. 229+85.27

+0.74%

STA = 226+22.34

EL = 280.88

+0.84% +1.03% +0.69%

EXISTING GRADE

281.77

228+4

7.3

2

RT

E. 609

CO

NS

TR.

B

10+0

0.0

0

EN

TR. #

3

CO

NS

TR.

B

224+00.00 225+00.00 226+00.00 227+00.00 228+00.00 229+00.00

278.2

5

278.5

1

278.8

6

279.16

278.8

7

279.8

5

280.12

280.3

9

280.5

8

280.7

7

280.9

9

281.24

281.50

281.66

281.97

282.2

8

282.5

5

282.8

3

283.18

283.6

1

284.0

4

284.5

1

285.0

2

285.5

3

279.2

4

279.4

3

279.6

1

279.7

9

279.9

8

280.16

280.3

5

280.5

3

280.7

1

280.9

0

281.11

281.37

281.54

281.71

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

STA = 10+59.11

EL = 282.12

283.0

8

282.7

4

-2.00%

-33.3

3% +3

3.3

3%

STA = 10+62.11

EL = 281.12 255_

260_

265_

270_

275_

280_

285_

290_

0 LF

5 LF

50 LF

SCALE

Section 4.2.8Compliance Statement

Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection ImprovementA Design-Build ProjectFairfax County, Virginia

From: 0.168 miles west of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)To: 0.076 miles east of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)

Price Proposal

State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501Federal Project No.: STP-5A01 (382)

Contract ID Number: C00103318DB71

Proposal Submitted By:

& April 24, 2014

Section 4.3.1Attachment 4.3.1Price Proposal Form

Section 4.3.2Price Adjustment Information and Forms

Section 4.3.3Proposal Guaranty

Section 4.3.4Forms C-104 and C-105

Attachments 4.3.4 (a) and 4.3.4 (b)

braddock road (route 620) and pleasant valley road (route ... · final or estimated contract value...

Documents