brain fingerprinting

13
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING TECHNOLOGY Presentation by PRIYODARSHINI DHAR ROLL: 2010-1041 SEMINAR ON

Upload: priyodarshini-dhar

Post on 24-May-2015

3.287 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Brain fingerprinting

BRAIN FINGERPRINTINGTECHNOLOGY

Presentation byPRIYODARSHINI DHAR

ROLL: 2010-1041

SEMINAR ON

Page 2: Brain fingerprinting

What is Brain Fingerprinting?

Brain fingerprinting is a computer based technology designed to determine hidden information in individual’s brain by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures presented on a computer screen.

Brain fingerprints are measured by an EEG event-related potential, a P300-MERMER.

Page 3: Brain fingerprinting

P300:

Specific, measurable brain response emitted by the brain of a subject who has the relevant information stored in his brain.It is based on Oddball Paradigm.

MERMER :

Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic response.It is a patented device and comes along with a head gear.

FIG : Showing the experimental setup

Page 4: Brain fingerprinting

OPERATING MECHANISM :

Picture/word shown to an individual (Stimulus)

Triggers neurons

of brain

Generates brainwave (P300)

Electrical Potentials Accumulate in brain (MERMER)

Headgear fitted withElectrodes placed on scalp

P300 –MERMER(an scalp ERP EEG)Measures brainwaves

Generates analog

signals

EEG amplifier

Study

the dataUsing a computer program

Found Guilty/ Not guilty

Page 5: Brain fingerprinting

Types of Stimuli Used

• Probes– Life-experience related– Relevant to the investigated event -recognizable and noteworthy only

for the subjects who had participated in the event (MERMER)• Targets

– Push a button to indicate known image – Contains relevant information– Creates a baseline

• Irrelevant Stimuli – information relevant to the crime that the suspect claims to have no

knowledge of

Page 6: Brain fingerprinting

How Brain Waves are used to detect guilt?A suspect is tested by looking at three kinds of information

represented by different colored lines : RED : Information the suspect is expected to know It arises due to target type stimulus. GREEN: Information not to suspect. The irrelevant stimuli

is responsible for this type of brain waves. BLUE: Information of the crime that only perpetrator

would know. This occurs due to probes.

Page 7: Brain fingerprinting

In this figure the red and blue lines are closely correlated, suspect has knowledge of crime

Information regarding the crime is not known.

Page 8: Brain fingerprinting

Phases of Brain Fingerprinting

There are four stages to Brain Fingerprinting:

1. Crime Scene Evidence Collection: Gathering evidences from crime scenes

2. Brain Evidence Collection: A specialist checks whether the crime scene evidence matches evidence stored in brain.

3. Computer Evidence Analysis: Computerized analysis is done on the brain evidences and statistical methods are

applied to move to the next phase.

4. Scientific Result: Finding whether the person is guilty or not guilty

Page 9: Brain fingerprinting

Features of Brain FingerprintingThe interpretation in brain fingerprinting is to look for P300 as response to stimuli related to crime in question, e.g. a murder weapon or a victim’s face.

It is based on EEG signals, the system does not require the testee to issue a verbal response to questions or stimuli

It uses cognitive brain responses, and it does not depend on the emotions of the subject, nor is it affected by emotional responses

It is different from polygraph(lie-detector), which measures emotion-based physiological signals such as heart rate, sweating and blood pressure

Unlike polygraph testing, it does not attempt to determine whether the subject is lying or telling the truth.

Page 10: Brain fingerprinting

• The entire Brain Fingerprinting System is under computer control. The computer control includes:

Presentation of the stimuli

Recording of electrical brain activity

Mathematical data analysis algorithm that compares the

responses of the 3 stimulus

Determination of information present or information

absent

Page 11: Brain fingerprinting

Case Studies

• Macon County, Missouri Sheriff Robert Dawson engaged Dr. Farwell to conduct a Brain Fingerprinting test on murder suspect James B. Grinder. The test proved that the record stored in Grinder’s brain matched the scene of the murder of Julie Helton.

• Brain Fingerprinting could detect trained terrorists even before they strike.

Page 12: Brain fingerprinting

References

• Farwell LA, Donchin E., “The brain detector: P300 in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology”

• Kumar Ravi, “Brain Fingerprinting”, Compusoft -An international journal of advanced computer technology, 1 (2), Dec-2012 (Volume-I, Issue-II)

• Farwell LA, Donchin E., “Brain Fingerprinting”• Wikipedia Brain Fingerprinting

Page 13: Brain fingerprinting

• THANK YOU !