brainstorming through mind mapping - research.ucf.edu · introduction • carl selfe, president of...
TRANSCRIPT
Brainstorming Through Mind Mapping
1
Introduction• Carl Selfe, President of The Proposal Center
• Venue for Creative Proposal Development
• Fortune 100’s - Chasing $100+M Contracts
• Mind Map Brainstorming Process
• Methodical Proposal Step-Build Process
2
* Industry Average derived from Grant Thornton ReportsAnnual Survey of 26 states and District of Colombia
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
33%
30% 36%
44%
56%
83%
2007
2008
2009-2011
5-Year Win RatesTPC vs. Industry Average*
3
BACKLOG
$ Billion11. 4
In the last 5 years:
5
AVERAGE CONTRACT VALUE
$ Million253
In the last 5 years:
6
Awarded18Won15OUT OF THE LAST
In the last 2 years:
7
Awarded18Won15OUT OF THE LAST
In the last 2 years:
7
Mind Mapping Success
26 Proposals Won Worth $2.2 Billion
Prev. Maint. & Inspec"on: DOD Hospitals $40M
Mod., Repair, & Renova"on: DOD Hospitals $23M
Facili"es Repair & Renova"on $12M
Spain Base Maintenance Contract $111M
West Sound Base Opera"ng Support (BOS) $475M
Defense Depot Guam Opera"ons $17M
Far East Fuels: Guam Fuel Terminal $55M
Def. Energy Supt. Ctr. (DESC) Lajes Fuel Term. $1.5M
DESC Incirlik Fuel Terminal $1.5M
DESC Osan AB Fuel Terminal $1.5M
DESC Anderson AB Fuel Terminal $1.5M
DESC Kadena AB Fuel Terminal $1.5M
DESC Misawa AB Fuel Terminal $1.5M
DESC Ramstein AB Fuel Terminal $1.55M
Privately Owned Veh. Stg. (POV) East U.S. $41M
POV West U.S. $55M
POV Hawaii $24M
Defense Reutiliztion & Mtkg.Office, SWA (6 sites) $330M
Manas AB BOS $7M
USMC Central Storage Points (22 sites) $140M
NAMSA Camp Services $33M
NAMSA Food Services $33M
IPV 1 Le#erkenny, Priva"zed Parts Supply $27M
IPV 2 Tobyhana, Priva"zed Parts Supply $233M
Defense Depot Kuwait SWA Opera"ons $315M
3PL Clothing $15M
8
TPC and Brainstorming
9
Genesis of the term “Brainstorming”
When a group works together, the members should engage in a “brainstorm” which means “using the brain to storm a creative problem and doing so in a commando fashion, with each stormer attacking the same objective”
1948 Best Seller
Alex Osborn - B.B.D.O Advertising Agency Partner, inspires admen to generate 87 ideas in 90 minutes.
10
Capture Team Proposal Team Project Team‣ Business Dev. Director
‣ Business Dev. Manager
‣ Subject Matter Experts
‣ Key Personnel Candidates
‣ Subcontractors
‣ Proposal Manager
‣ Production Support
‣ Volume Managers
‣ Estimating & Pricing
‣ Subject Matter Experts
‣ Operations
‣ Human Resources
‣ Contracts
‣ Finance
‣ Transportation
TPC’s Challenges for Team-Based Collaboration
3-7 Different Companies
11
IPTs Fuse Complex Data
Capture Team
ProposalTeam
ProjectTeam
12
IPTs Fuse Complex Data
12
PROCESS STAGE STEPS
Explore the Challenge
Objective Finding (identify the goal, wish or challenge)
Explore the Challenge
Fact Finding (gather the relevant data)Explore the Challenge Problem Finding (clarify the problems that need to be solved in
order to achieve the goal)
Generate Ideas Idea Finding (generate ideas to solve the identified problem)
Prepare for ActionSolution Finding (move from idea to implementable solution)
Prepare for ActionAcceptance Finding (plan for action)
Osborn-Parnes Creative Problem Solving Technique
1948
13
1958Yale University
Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C.H. (1958); Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 22-47
TAYLOR, BERRY & BLOCK’S EMPIRICAL TEST OF OSBORN’S TECHNIQUE
14
Group Brainstorm vs. SoloIndividual students came up with twice the number of ideas as brainstorming groups
Idea
15 8
WORK SOLO FOR FIRST IDEAS LIST(MIND MAPPING ROUND 1)
15
CHARLAN NEMETH STUDIES DEBATE
2003University of Califonia at Berkeley
Ph.D. in Psychology, Cornell University
16
Debate
No Criticism Rule Debate Rule No Rules
Later Idea
12 67Idea
DEBATE STIMULATES THOUGHT AND SPARKS CREATIVITY(MIND MAPPING ROUNDS 2 AND 3)
17
BEN JONES LOOKS AT EFFICACY OF TEAM RESEARCH
Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management
Ph.D. in Economics, MIT
200718
19.9M2.1M
Peer-Reviewed Papers
Patents
Working in Groups
19
OF SCIENTIFIC SUBFIELDS
95%Levels of Teamwork have increased in more than
Working in Groups
20
PER DECADE
20%Team sizes increased
Working in Groups
21
AS MANY CITATIONS
2XMultiple author papers received
Working in Groups
22
MORE LIKELY TO BE TEAM RUN
6XHome Run Papers
(100+ citations) are
Working in Groups
23
Working in Groups
“Citation”TEAMING WORKS THE BEST(MIND MAPPING ROUNDS 2 AND 3)
24
ISACC KOHANE STUDIES PROXIMITY
2010Harvard Medical School
MD in Medicine, Brown University, Ph.D. in Computer Science, Boston University
25
Undergraduates spend 18 months:
35,000MappedPeer-Reviewed Papers
Co-authors’ locations
Subsequent Citations Tallied
26
1 kilometer or more
Proximity
Research Paper
27
Proximity
Within 10 meters
Research Paper
28
MOST CITED 10 meters distance or less
LEAST CITED 1+ kilometers distance or more
The Best Research
Results: Subsequent Citations
CREATE THE INTIMATE WORK SPACE(RESEARCH TOGETHER)
29
Proximity
Pixar Headquarters Atrium
30
Proximity
MIT Building 20
30
Brainstorming by Mind Mapping• Tony Buzan, 1993, Definitive Work
• Inventor of Mind Mapping
• Leading Author (100+ Books) and Top 5 Speaker (Forbes)
• Authority on Creativity/Memory/Thinking
• Consultant to 4 Countries, Microsoft, Disney, and HSBC Bank
31
PROCESS STAGE STEPS
Emersion and Incubation
Fact Finding (consume all relevant data and let it incubate a day or two)
Round 1: Individual Solo Ideas
Each Individual develops a list of ideas in a Mind MapRound 1: Individual Solo Ideas
Ideas recorded and aligned in a consolidated Mind Map without descussionRound 1: Individual Solo Ideas
Illumination Phase (brain relief)
Round 2: Small Groups Debate Ideas (3-4 People)
Each Small Group debates, reorganizes, and lists the ideas or new ideas in a Mind Map. (Round 1 Mind Map available.)Round 2: Small
Groups Debate Ideas (3-4 People)
With one speaker for each group, ideas recorded and aligned in a new consolidated Mind Map without discussion
Round 2: Small Groups Debate Ideas (3-4 People)
Illumination Phase (brain relief)
Round 3: Two Groups Debate Ideas (split the room in half)
Each Group debates, reorganizes, and lists the ideas or new ideas in a Mind Map. (Rounds 1&2 Mind Maps available.)
Round 3: Two Groups Debate Ideas (split the room in half)
With one speaker for each group, ideas recorded and aligned in a new consolidated Mind Map without discussion
Round 3: Two Groups Debate Ideas (split the room in half) Gleaning process used to pick up sub-tier ideas from the two preceding Mind
Map sessions
Round 3: Two Groups Debate Ideas (split the room in half)
Final Mind Map Publication (plan for action)
Brainstorming by Mind Mapping1993
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Quick Start GuideQuick Start Guide
7 Steps to Better Thinking
1. Set your purpose/goal.
2. Start in the CENTRE of blank paper turned sideways.
3. Quickly sketch an IMAGE of your focus in the centre.
4. Use at least 3 COLOURS, for emphasis, structure, texture, creativity.
5. Draw curved lines, radiating from centre (thick to thin) CONNECTING main branches to central image & at each level.
6. Use 1 key word or image per line for more power and flexibility in thinking.
7. Use images throughout as a picture paints a 1,000 words.
How to Mind Map®
.com.auDrawn in imindmapGo to imindmap.com.au Go to
40
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
Tony Buzan at TPC
41
TPC Kickoff
42
TPC Kickoff
42
TPC Kickoff
42
TPC Kickoff
42
TPC Mind Mapping
43
TPC Mind Mapping
Round 1Round 1
44
TPC Mind Mapping
Round 1Round 1
44
TPC Mind Mapping
44
TPC Mind Mapping
Round 2Round 2
44
TPC Mind Mapping
Round 2Round 2
44
TPC Mind Mapping
44
TPC Mind Mapping
Round 3Round 3
44
TPC Mind Mapping
ResultsResults
44
TPC Mind Mapping
ResultsResults
44
Summary
Individuals craft ideas solo to start the session
45
Summary
Create the “Intimate Work Space
45
Summary
Work in groups to cross pollinate
45
Summary
Introduce debate (“properly managed dissent”)
45
Questions?
46