brand loyalty created in service sectors.docx
DESCRIPTION
brand loyaltyTRANSCRIPT
ASSIGNMENT ON
SERVICES MARKETING
TOPIC: 1) BRAND LOYALTY CREATED BY SERVICE SECTOR
2) SERVICE QUALITY OF FIVE SERVICE ORGANISATIONS
SUBMITTED BY:
SHALINI CHATTERJEE (pgdma1156)
DAYANANDA SAGAR BUSINESS SCHOOL
BATCH-(2011-2013)
ASSIGNED BY:
PROF: Dr Sai Ganesh
BRAND LOYALTY CREATED IN SERVICE SECTOR
1
4.1 The Components of Customer Loyalty
Customer loyalty is a key objective for organisations pursuing a relationship approach with
their customers. However similar to the variety of definitions for Relationship Marketing,
there is no agreed definition for customer loyalty. This section presents the different
definitions of customer loyalty from the literature. Where attempts have been made to
conceptualise loyalty it has typically been divided into 2 typologies–behaviour and attitude.
(Jacoby & Chestnut, 1978; Kahn & Meyer, 1991; Dick & Basu, 1994). Within these
typologies various components of loyalty are described.
The behavioural typology to customer loyalty is primarily concerned with measures of repeat
purchase, proportion of purchases etc. Although, this is considered to be a relevant measure,
the main criticism of this typology is that it does not include the customer’s motives for their
behaviour. Therefore attitudinal approaches to loyalty have been developed. While a
behavioural approach to loyalty is still valid as a component of loyalty, it is argued that
attitudinal approaches to loyalty should supplement the behavioural approach (Samuelson &
Sandvik, 1997). The attitudinal typology includes, for example, measures of commitment and
trust. The following describes the various researches that have attempted to define loyalty.
The next two sections (4.1.1 and 4.1.2) present behavioural measures of loyalty (repurchase
and satisfaction) and illustrates the shortcomings of adopting such narrow approaches.
Section 4.1.3 identifies attitudinal measures of loyalty i.e. commitment and trust.
Section 4.1.4. presents findings from the literature where loyalty had been defined with a
number of different components. Section 4.1.5 summarises these four sections by identifying
the components of loyalty.
4.1.1 Behavioural Typology - Customer Retention/Repurchase and
2
Loyalty
Discussions on customer loyalty tend to use the term loyalty and retention synonymously.
However it is evident from the literature that there is criticism of organisations that have
chosen to define customer loyalty as simply customer retention and thus simply achieving
repurchase. As Stewart (1996) states: ‘Customer loyalty and customer retention are not
synonymous’ (Stewart, 1996 p.8)
Customer retention does not accurately capture this level of bonding. Christopher, Payne and
Ballantyne (1991) in their ‘Relationship Marketing ladder of Customer Loyalty’ further
support this.
PROSPECT
Here the customer progresses up the ladder from customers who regularly purchase
(customer retention), to customers who are strong supporters of the company and finally to
being active and vocal advocates for the company and thus referring others to the
organisation. Thus as stated in 4.1 when defining customer loyalty there is a need to consider
attitudinal approaches rather than just repurchase. Furthermore while customer loyalty has
been defined by some as a set of behaviours that loyal customers display, it is apparent that
the behaviours are reflecting attitudes. These behaviours are typically the ones that Reichheld
and Sasser (1990) have identified as generating the financial benefits from loyalty. Thus a
loyal customer buys more, will pay a premium and becomes an advocate and recommends
the company. For example: ‘Loyal customers repeatedly purchase products or services. They
recommend a company to others. And they stick with a business over time’ lifetime value)’
Thus, customer loyalty is a more complex phenomenon that includes other properties rather
than just the behavioural construct of repeat purchasing (Samuelson & Sandvik, 1997)
4.1.2 Behavioural Typology - Satisfaction and Loyalty
3
In the late 80’s and early 90’s a number of organisations pursued TQM and similar
methodologies to deliver customer satisfaction. These were pursued as it was felt that this
would impact on their bottom line profitability by increasing loyalty as it is apparent that
when customers’ progress through the phases they are strengthening their bonds with the
organisation.
It had been thought and research has found (Waterhouse & Morgan, 1994; and Eriksson &
Vaghult, 2000) that it was sufficient to merely satisfy customers and that they would remain
loyal; however research by Jones and Sasser (1995) has found that satisfaction and loyalty are
not directly correlated, particularly in competitive environments organisations need to
‘completely satisfy’ their customers
This has identified that while a high level of satisfaction is an important component of loyalty
it is not the only component. Thus as Jones and Sasser (1995) p.91 commented“merely
satisfying customers that have the freedom to make choices is not enough to keep them
loyal”. This has been supported further by Oliver (1999), Fredericks (2001) and Coyles and
Gokey (2002). Oliver (1999) has concluded that while satisfaction is a necessary step in
loyalty formation, ultimate loyalty is a combination of perceived product superiority,
personal fortitude, social bonding, and their synergistic effects’ Fredericks (2001) also points
out that there is a big difference between satisfaction, which is a passive customer condition,
and loyalty, which is an active or proactive relationship with the supplier.
Furthermore, Coyles and Gokey (2002) found from their research that satisfaction alone does
not make a customer loyal and that merely measuring satisfaction does not tell a company
how susceptible its’ customers are to changing their spending patterns. They identify three
basic customer attitudes, emotive, inertial and deliberative that underlies loyalty profiles.
They have found that the emotive customers are the most loyal. Thus it would seem that
4
while satisfaction is an important component of loyalty the loyalty definition needs to
incorporate more attitudinal and emotive components.
4.1.3 Attitudinal components and loyalty
The critique of the research surrounding repurchase and loyalty and satisfaction and loyalty
has suggested that loyalty includes attitudinal components. The following section presents
research that supports the role of individual’s attitudes in defining loyalty.
4.1.3.1 Commitment and Trust
Jacoby and Kyner (1973) argue that it is commitment that distinguishes between loyalty and
repeat purchase behaviour. Thus a person who is committed towards a product/service has an
attitude which is durable and impactful. In terms of commitment there would appear to be
two types of commitment – affective and calculative commitment.
Affective commitment is defined as the extent to which a customer likes to maintain their
relationship with the organisation (Buchanan, 1974). Whereas calculative commitment is
where the customer is loyal because they have to be rather than that they desire to be (Meyer
& Allen, 1984). Thus it follows that the calculative committed customer is less reliable as he
could get an offer that enables him to switch suppliers. Samuelson and Sandvik (1997)
suggest that either or both types of commitment could be used in loyalty research and is
dependent upon the purpose of the research. For example, to predict future loyal behaviour
affective commitment would be the most effective.
Hart and Johnson (1999) have stated that while loyalty has been traditionally defined in terms
of its consequences:
_ Repurchase intent
_ Referral intent
_ Share of purchase
_ Actual repurchase
5
They suggest that for organisations to achieve true loyalty that they must go beyond customer
delight to ‘total trust’ Agee (2002) p.42 supported this and stated that ‘True loyalty is based
on trust, a high degree of satisfaction and a strong value proposition’. Buttle and Burton
(2001) suggest from their review of the research that loyalty is an attitudinal state which
reflects value, trust and commitment within supplier-customer relationships.
Research by Garbarino and Johnson (1999) identified that trust and commitment were the
mediators between attitudes and future intentions for customers with a strong relationship
with an organisation (theatre in their research). Thus it would seem that commitment and
trust are key components when defining loyalty.
4.1.4 Combining the components of loyalty
Although some researchers have chosen a behavioural definition of loyalty and others an
attitudinal definition of loyalty, there is various research to suggest that a variety of
components to define loyalty have been considered which include both the behavioural and
attitudinal components. Prus and Brandt (1995) have described a ‘Secure customer
Satisfaction Index’ where they have taken three major components to measure loyalty:
overall customer satisfaction, likelihood of repeat business, and likelihood to recommend the
company to others. They describe these three components as the core of a meaningful
customer loyalty index.
Pugh (1991) identified four desirable characteristics that make up the loyal cu stomer – repeat
purchasing, cross product/service purchasing, and referral/word of mouth active and immune
to competition. Jones and Sasser (1995) p.94 define loyalty as ‘the feeling of attachment to or
affection for a company’s people, products or services these feelings manifest themselves in
many forms of customer behaviour. The ultimate measure of loyalty, of course, is share of
purchases in the category’.
6
Zeithaml, Berry and Parasuramen (1996) have integrated research findings and anecdotal
evidence and identify the following manifestations of loyalty:
_ Expressing a preference for a company over others
_ Continuing to purchase from it
_ Increasing business with it in the future.
Oliver (1999) identified that while loyalty tends to be defined as repeat purchasing frequency
or relative volume of same brand purchasing which basically record what the customer does,
none tap into the psychological meaning of loyalty.
To encompass these psychological elements Oliver (1999) has described loyalty as: “a deeply
held commitment to rebuy or repatronize a preferred product/service consistently in the
future, thereby causing repetitive same-brand or same brandset purchasing, despite
situational influences and marketing efforts having the potential to cause switching
behavior.” And“fervently desires to rebuy a product or service and will have no other –
pursuing this quest against all odds and at all costs” (Oliver, 1999 p.36)
However he does conclude that there needs to be further research into what is the
fundamental meaning of loyalty. More recently Jaishankar, Arnold and Kristy (2000) based
their conceptualisation of customer loyalty as both commitment to the relationship and other
overt loyalty behaviours. They described loyalty as a multidimensional construct that
included repeat patronage; self stated retention, price insensitivity, resistance to counter
persuasion, and the likelihood of spreading positive word of mouth.
4.1.5 Summarising the components of customer loyalty
Thus within the literature while there is no common definition of customer loyalty, there tend
to be agreement that loyal customers demonstrate the following behaviours and attitudes:-
_ repeatedly purchase from the organisation (preferring and choosing it to others)
_ Have a high level of satisfaction with the company
7
_ will recommend the company to others
_ will trust the company
_ will be committed to the company
Reichheld (1996) has identified a further measure of loyalty which as an outcome
incorporates some of the above. He has described a measure of loyalty as ‘share of the
wallet’ (p.60) i.e. what percentage of the customer’s purchases is in the product categories
that the organisations serve. This definition is also of interest because it would seem to
support the most frequently used definition in the brand loyalty literature. Within the brand
loyalty literature there has been considerably more debate about what is an appropriate
definition of brand loyalty. However, before these are reviewed the differences between
customer loyalty and brand loyalty are considered.
4.2 Brand Loyalty compared to Customer loyalty
As an area of interest brand loyalty would appear to have a longer history in Marketing than
Customer loyalty. Discussion on Brand loyalty began in the literature as early as 1923 with
an article in the Harvard Business review by Copeland. A review of the evolution in brand
loyalty research by Schultz (2000) however identifies that the majority of the basics of brand
loyalty stems from research conducted by the Chicago Tribune in the late 40’s and early 50’s
which recorded consumer household purchases. By the 60’s the research into brand loyalty
tended to focus on the economics of information i.e. the cost and ability of consumers to
search for information about alternatives and to understand brand choices (Farley, 1964). By
the 70’s the impact of psychological factors were being raised to explain why loyalty
occurred (Jacoby & Kyner, 1973). In the 80’s, research focus shifted to consumer choice and
behaviour modelling by using supermarket scanner data and thus observable consumer
purchase behaviour. Furthermore, in this period marketers were starting to use more
sophisticated regression techniques to segment behaviours. However, similar to the findings
8
from the customer loyalty research Schultz (2000) p. 43 has identified that “less work
appears to have been done on the consumer side, asking why consumers become and remain
loyal to brands”. Whereas customer loyalty has been relevant to a number of sectors, brands
have tended to be associated with fast moving consumer goods, where consumers often buy
more than one brand in a category (East, 1997). East (1997) has made the distinction of brand
loyalty as a proportion of expenditure for FMCG whereas he sees customer loyalty as
allegiance which is assessed by repeat purchase; these are typically for durables, industrial
purchases and services. The link between customer loyalty and brands is also demonstrated
by recent research (Brand Strategy, 2001), which has identified that a strong brand has a
positive relationship with customer loyalty.
East’s definition above appears to have been restricted by his choice of definition from brand
loyalty however if we consider the debate on defining brand loyalty we can see that the
differences between brand loyalty and customer loyalty start to become more blurred,
particularly when considering the behavioural measures of customer loyalty.
4.2.1. Definitions of Brand Loyalty
Cunningham (1956) identified three possible definitions of brand loyalty as:
1) Customers lost and gained over specific time periods,
2) Time sequences of individual purchases and
3) Share of the market.
Cunningham felt that the most appropriate of the three were share of the market since with
the first definition he felt that an arbitrary time period may distort the findings e.g. if a
consumer was out of the market in the time under review. The second definition could also
lead to a biased result since the researchers would need to make a subjective judgement on
the buying patterns of the consumer e.g. buy brand A once and then brand B five times. He
felt that the market share definition gave an objective measure of brand loyalty. This
9
definition has been criticised, as too simplistic and further definitions have been proposed
(Day, 1969; Burford, Enis & Paul, 1971; and Olson & Jacoby, 1971) Day (1969) finds that
the true brand loyal buyer is; conscious of a need to economise when buying, confident of her
brand judgements, heavy buyer, and older housewife with smaller average household and is
less influenced by day to day price fluctuations. Burford, Enis and Paul (1971) developed an
operational measure for defining loyalty. They have identified three components to loyalty.
Budget ratio (fraction of total budget for the product class allocated to the loyalty object),
switching ratio (number of opportunities to switch plus one minus number of switches
divided by number of intervals in the survey period) and patronage ratio – (total number of
stores or brands available plus one minus number of stores patronised or brands purchased
divided by number of stores or brands in market).
Olson and Jacoby (1971) have further supported the need for a multidimensional
conceptualisation of brand loyalty. Using Factor Analysis they found that the following are
linked to Brand loyalty: proportion of purchases devoted to the most often purchased brand,
number of different brands purchased over the past two years, number of times the favourite
brand was purchased out of the last five purchases, three consecutive purchases out of the last
five purchases, actual number of consecutive purchases of favourite brand out of the last five
purchases.
The research into brand loyalty has also considered the impact of brand loyalty on store
loyalty where brand loyalty has been weakly associated with store loyalty (Cunningham,
1956 & 1961; Carman, 1970; Keng & Ehrenberg, 1984; and East, Harris, Wilson &
Hammond, 1995). These definitions of brand loyalty would suggest that the definitions have
focussed on the nature and frequency of purchase. Where there appears to be similarity with
customer loyalty is the behaviour identified as ‘Repeatedly purchase from the organisation
10
(preferring and choosing it to others)’. The other components identified in defining customer
loyalty i.e.
_ Have a high level of satisfaction with the company
_ will recommend the company to others
_ will trust the company
_ will be committed to the company
may be less relevant for FMCG where there is less involvement in the purchase. AsMitchell
(1994) has described in his article based on work by Jan Hofmeyr who has looked at
consumers of products to religion. The extent to which customers are loyal is determined by
four factors – the degree to which it fits the individual’s needs and values, the degree to
which it involves the individual; the availability of an alternative; and the individual’s
attraction to the alternative. Where there is low involvement then there will be more
switching e.g. cat litter Vs financial services. Thus one could argue that the more emotive
bonds are less likely in FMCG goods where there is less involvement etc.
4.2.2 Identification of individual differences with brand loyal
Since there appears to be similarities between customer loyalty and brand loyalty, the brand
loyalty literature has been reviewed to establish whether there are individual differences
within the customer base and that there are brand loyal types. A review of the brand loyalty
literature shows that there has been considerably more research in this area. There are a
number of studies that have sought to test whether those with high brand loyalty have socio-
economic characteristics, which differ significantly from those buyers with low brand loyalty.
With the exception of Snyder (1991) these studies have mainly been for food and grocery
purchases. Cunningham (1956) found no difference between brand loyal and non-brand loyal
but commented that his findings could have been different if he had considered loyalty for a
particular product group. Frank (1967) also concluded that socio–economic characteristics
11
contributed little to brand loyalty. However Carman (1970) established a definite link
between personal characteristics, the shopping processes and brand loyalty. He tested and
found his hypothesis to be true that personal characteristics of consumers will explain
differences in store loyalty e.g. found loyal are housewives, who work, lower income, busy
mothers with children at home, do less entertaining, less interested in homemaking. Uncles
and Ehrenberg (1990) found that older consumers do not buy less i.e. are more brand loyal;
any differences are not significant East, Harris, Wilson and Hammond (1995) sought to
establish the profile of a brand loyal buyer for supermarkets. Using a mail survey they found
that brand loyalty is related to household income (high loyals had incomes of £20,000+),
brand loyals spend more, are more quality conscious (not price sensitive). They are less loyal
when aged below 25 and over 65. Snyder (1991) has considered loyalty for frequently
purchased consumer services, and he found only weak (and negative) correlation between
generalised service loyalty and educational level and family size, thus the more educated and
the bigger family the less likely they are to be loyal. He suggests that the more educated are
more confident and less reliant on loyalty, as a means of reducing the risk perceived in
purchasing services. His findings suggest that demographic correlates to generalised loyalty
do exist but exhibit weak measures of association. However, demographic correlates were
identified with loyalty to individual services e.g. gender with inexpensive motel and hair
stylist, age and fast food restaurants etc, educational level negatively correlated to gas
stations and fast food restaurants, family size negatively correlated with choice of hairstylist.
East, Harris, Wilson and Lomax (1995) found that store loyal people are 25-44 years old and
prefer large out of town supermarkets. They quote Enis and Paul as finding that high loyalty
was associated with low income and fewer years of education. They did not agree with other
findings that store loyalty is a phenomenon of the underprivileged. They perceive that high
loyal have more commitments. They suggest that loyal are from the 25-44 age group, and
12
perhaps have greater family commitments but this hasn’t been substantiated. Thus it would
seem that within the brand loyalty literature there has been some consideration of individual
differences and the characteristics of a brand loyal customer.
4.2.3 Summary of identified loyalty components and relevant individual differences
The previous literature on customer and brand loyalty has identified the component variables
of loyalty as people who:
• Repeatedly purchase from the organisation (preferring and choosing it to others)
• Have a high level of satisfaction with the company
• Will recommend the company to others
• Will trust the company
• Will be committed to the company
• Spend proportionally more with that provider than others i.e. Share of the wallet
The literature in brand loyalty has identified that there may be some relationship between
loyalty and age, income, educational level and family commitments.
4.3 Summary
Although there has not been one agreed definition of loyalty, the customer loyalty and brand
loyalty literature has identified the various components of loyalty as people who:
• Repeatedly purchase from the organisation (preferring and choosing it to others)
• Have a high level of satisfaction with the company
• Will recommend the company to others
• Will trust the company
• Will be committed to the company
• Spend proportionally more with that provider than others i.e. Share of the wallet
13
FIVE SERVICE ORGANISATIONS AND THE QUALITY OF SERVICE
Disney’s A pproach to Brand Loyalty
That’s the bottom line of the Disney Difference. More than any other company, we are able to successfully and
consistently create multiple experiences and products out of our creative properties in ways that generate consumer
enthusiasm and real shareholder value.
– Bob Iger
Disney’s Approach to Brand Loyalty
For over 85 years, The Walt Disney Company has maintained a comfortable and lasting
position in the marketplace. At Disney Destinations around the world, Cast Members
(employees) explore the link between Guest (customer) satisfaction and brand reputation.
This integration sets the Disney brand apart. Brand loyalty is a reciprocal relationship that
begins with the business. A business must be loyal to its customers in order to receive loyalty
in return. At Disney, long-lasting relationships evolve: Guests become friends and friends
become family.
PROGRAM BENEFITS
For decades, Disney has been creating and sustaining lifelong relationships with its customers
while producing strong business results. This course identifies how the powerful relationship
between experiences and a brand generates superior bottom-line results through greater
customer and employee loyalty. Throughout the course, you explore Disney techniques used
to retain customers for life and identify reliable strategies to deliver more effectively on your
organization’s brand.
14
You will learn how to:
Discover Disney time-tested practices and principles that build and fortify brand
loyalty.
Identify the impact brand loyalty has on financial performance and reputation.
Build lasting relationships with your customers to solidify brand loyalty.
Expand your products and services to foster repeat business.
Apply quality standards to support your brand promise and maintain consistent
service delivery.
Sustain a competitive advantage for your organization.
WHOSHOULD ATTEND
Anyone interested in creating lasting customer relationships and a competitive advantage by
applying Disney brand loyalty principles and practices.
Brand Loyalty Model
A loyalty relationship begins with organization-wide commitment. Everyone must exemplify
internal service quality, a key component to the “loyalty profit chain,” used to demonstrate
the strategy for long-term financial results. By building a bridge of trust, relationships are
built, thus repeat business grows and the advance towards a sustainable future begins. When
an organization’s brand aligns with individual identity; when experiences deliver superior
value; when contacts build relationships—the link to creating loyalty is established.
Learning Objectives
Define brand loyalty.
Identify “loyalty profit chain.”
Explore the impact brand loyalty has on financial performance and reputation.
15
Building Relationships
Many customers will discontinue their relationship with an organization because they gained
a perception that the business didn’t care. The relationships and personal contacts that
consumers encounter can either hurt or harm a business, even if the brand parallels individual
identity and the experience illustrates quality. A natural extension of a mutually beneficial
relationship between customers and an organization’s employees is the positive reaction that
results in increased loyalty.
Learning Objectives
Demonstrate how building relationships with your customers can create both loyalty
to your brand and lead to repeat business.
Empower your staff to spontaneously create relationship moments with your
customers.
Building Repeat Business
At Disney, we believe that it is both an art and a science to keep Guests coming back. It costs
a lot less to retain a Guest than it does to obtain a new one; therefore, it is essential to attain
repeat business by delivering superior value and developing relationships that last. When you
surpass the experience offered by your competition, and when you add to that by exceeding
expectations at each and every point of contact, you hold the key that will keep bringing
customers back.
Learning Objectives
Explain how expanding product and service offerings can build repeat business and
increase brand loyalty.
Provide tools to assist you in optimizing repeat business.
16
Increase knowledge of how quality standards can be applied to employee roles to
support your brand promise and the consistent delivery of quality service.
Greater understanding for the positioning of your brand
Sustainable Competitive Advantage
When someone believes in a brand—when he or she feels a sense of ownership over it and
can use it as a form of self-expression—that is when a brand has an advantage over its
competitor. The lasting power of a brand can sustain an organization through any economic
storm. More importantly, a brand that garners loyalty through the building of relationships
and repeat business should also have the flexibility to change appropriately, generating
customer loyalty for future generations.
Learning Objectives
Maximize brand loyalty across all audiences.
Organize your company for a sustainable future.
APOLLO HOSPITALS CREATING BRAND LOYALTY
APOLLO HOSPITALS AN INTRODUCTION Dr. Prathap C Reddy, Chairman, Apollo
Hospitals Apollo Hospitals Group is the acknowledged leader in bringing super specialty
world-class healthcare to India. It is presently the largest integrated healthcare company in
Asia.
Mission Statement “Our mission is to bring Healthcare of International standards
within the reach of every individual. We are committed to the achievement and
maintenance of excellence in education, research and healthcare for the benefit of
humanity”.
17
Third Party Administration Franchise Primary Care Clinics Health Education & e-
Learning Technology Services & Solutions Clinical Research & Site Management
Retail Pharmacies Project Consulting & Architectural Design Owned & Managed
Hospitals The Apollo Hospitals Group – Product line
Single-largest healthcare employer in the private sector Network of 5,000 doctors
across more than 50 specialties: Proven strength to attract clinical talent across
continents 70% of consultants qualified / trained / worked in UK / USA Our nurses
qualify for international placements (UK / USA) with a fair degree of ease Today,
Human Capital is a Significant Strength
Achievements: It has been the: first to establish health insurance company first group
to introduce preventive health care first to perform liver, multi-organ, cord blood
transplants first to introduce new techniques of coronary angioplasty first to perform
stereo-tactic radiotherapy and Radio-surgery (for brain tumors) in the country first
health care facility in India to be awarded ISO 9002.
APOLLO: THE SUPERBRAND APOLLO Hospitals, the country’s largest healthcare
services provider, has announced that it was recognized as a `Super brand of India
' in the healthcare sector for the year 2003 By Super Brands Council. The
criteria adopted by the Super brands Council were not of market share but more to do
with the brand image and perception. Apollo is a SUPER BRAND due to its mind
dominance, goodwill, consumer loyalty and emotional bonding.
Super Brand …..Continued…. Constant exposure to dynamic hospital situations in a
broad range of healthcare models. Access to latest developments in healthcare and
association with leading hospitals around the world. Access to a pool of trained
medical, nursing, paramedical and healthcare professionals.
18
APOLLO’s UPCOMING PLANS-GROWTH STRATEGIES MOBILE HEALTH
Collaboration b/w the Apollo and Ericsson has initiated the concept of Tele
medicines. Telemedicine delivered using mobile technology will enable the provision
of affordable and accessible healthcare to millions of people in Remote and rural
areas. Apollo Hospital signs MoU with austrian institute Apollo Specialty Hospitals
has signed an MoU with the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Radiation
Research at Donauspital, Vienna, under which the two organisations will exchange
knowledge and experience.
Apollo Hospitals Scouting for Partners in West Asia & Africa Apollo Hospitals
Group is scouting for partnering with hospitals in West Asia and Africa to leverage its
brand equity in these highly potential medical tourism markets. Specialized programs
are being devised, which enroll customers who are high risk for a disease the hospital
endeavors to be in constant touch with this group of people.
Taj Hotels
Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces comprises of 93 hotels in 55 locations across India
with an additional 16 international hotels in the Maldives, Malaysia, Australia, UK, USA,
Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Africa and the Middle East. The Taj Group of Hotels is one of the most
leading hotel chains of the world, famous for quality, luxury and service.
19
Project Objective
Create a social media footprint for 26 luxury hotels across the globe which starts from
building their social presences including engagement, response management and listening, to
the creation of an influencer outreach program.
Our Approach
Targeting new consumer segments focus on incremental revenue and driving loyalty were the
key goals. And a seamless integration of online and offline consumer behaviour would ensure
better consumer understanding and offering plans/offers accordingly.
End-to-end Solution
Customer Centrica developed a Social CRM, a global first for any hotel chain. The
purpose was to map guest profiles with their social media footprint, and building
communication plans around the same.
Differentiated engagement strategies were built across Facebook, YouTube, Flickr,
Tripadvisor, Blogs etc. covering various campaigns like food and beverage, weddings,
watersports, etc. across hotels. Innovative engagement vehicles like photo apps and
QR code campaigns were integrated.
A special application was conceived and created, allowing users to engage with 26
hotels in one place, either individually or collectively.
Customized 'listening posts' were put in place for each of the 26 hotels to create buzz
around that hotel, with built-in response management module. The social presence of
the hotels was made as interactive and dynamic as possible, creating consumer
experiences.
20
Business Value
Brand moved from an inward facing to customer centric approach to digital
Social presence of Taj online ensured access to new user segments, thus improving
the business
Social CRM helped achieve a clear picture of user profiles, hence creating marketing
campaigns around specific scenarios
Prompt response management and higher engagement levels led to larger number and
better quality leads
Taj became the world’s first hotel chain to use social CRM
ICICI Lombard General Insurance
ICICI Lombard General Insurance, the country’s largest private sector General Insurance
company has been presented with the Customer and Brand Loyalty award in the
¿Insurance Sector ; General¿ at the Loyalty Summit 2010, for the second consecutive year.
Loyalty Summit is a forum that focuses on the latest issues, developments and solutions that
concern customers. These awards recognise the efforts of companies in each sector who
understand the importance of customer loyalty and channel their efforts throughout the year
in achieving the same. ICICI Lombard received the award for its unremitting and
outstanding customer service delivery in the insurance sector.
The Loyalty Awards are an outcome of a combination of consumer research aided by
nominations received from organisations across sectors. The other award categories included
consumer durables, mutual funds, information technology, oil and gas etc. The consumer
research was conducted by KPMG from a sample size of 50,000 consumers across six cities
namely Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai and Calcutta.
21
BRAND LOYALTY CREATED BY ICICI LOMBARD
ICICI Lombard, a deeply customer-centric organization, has taken initiatives such as Red
Carpet, free Health check up camps and training of drivers for its customers. Red
Carpet is a unique and exclusive claims service initiative in the motor insurance which gives
ease in terms of documentation and reduction in claim processes. It also entails relaxation in
spot survey in case of a claim by allowing shifting of the vehicle from the loss location in
case the ICICI Lombard surveyor does not turn up within 6 hours and offer full claim without
any deduction, subject to policy terms and conditions. ICICI Lombard would make advance
payment for claims over Rs. one lakh, by paying 50% of assessed liability upfront, with dues
settled immediately after final invoice is raised.
The other customer service initiatives include free Health and Eye check-up camps, Driver
Trainings on Am I a safe driver?, exclusive access to national highway cashless network
and scheduled visits to customers to collect and assess feedback. The numbers of cashless
garages are also continuously increased, especially on the national highways. ICICI Lombard
has also set up its own Health Claims processing set up to manage customer claims with
better quality and faster response times.
As the general insurance industry evolves in India we believe that superior service quality
will be a key differentiator among insurers. We are humbled by this recognition and it
encourages us to further enhance our service commitment to our customers, said Mr. Kartik
Jain, Head Marketing &; Direct, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.
About ICICI Lombard General Insurance
ICICI Lombard is a 74:26 joint venture between ICICI Bank Limited, India’s second largest
bank with USD 75 billion in assets and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, a Canada based
USD 27 billion diversified financial services company engaged in general insurance,
22
reinsurance, insurance claims management and investment management.
ICICI Lombard is the largest private sector general insurance company in India with a Gross
Written Premium (GWP) of Rs. 37,492 million for the year ended March 31, 2009. As on
December 31, 2009, the company has 4,707 employees and 360 branches. In the financial
year ended March 31, 2009, the company issued over 4 million policies and serviced over 33
lakh claims. The company has a claim disposal ratio of 97% (percentage of claims) settled
against claims reported) as on March 31, 2009
The company has been assigned a domestic rating of iAAA¿ by ICRA (an associate of
Moody¿s Investors Service) for highest claim paying ability and a fundamentally strong
position, for the fourth consecutive year. ICICI Lombard Auto Insurance has been rated
highest in customer satisfaction by J.D. Power Asia Pacific in India among 11 auto
insurance providers. The company has been conferred the Golden Peacock- Eco Innovation
Award of 2009 for weather insurance and the Customer and Brand Loyalty award in the
Insurance Sector - Non-Life¿ at the 3rd Loyalty awards, 2010. It was awarded the
General Insurance Company of the Year¿ at the 11th Asia Insurance Industry Awards. The
company also won the NDTV Profit Business Leadership Award 2007 and was adjudged as
the most Customer Responsive Company in the Insurance category at the Economic Times
Avaya GlobalConnect Customer Responsiveness Award 2006. It has the Gold Shield for
Excellence in Financial Reporting¿ by the ICAI (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India)
for the year ended March 31, 2006.
ICICI Lombard allows instant policy issuance and renewal through its website
www.icicilombard.com for all retail insurance products including Car Insurance, Health
Insurance, Travel Insurance, Two Wheeler Insurance and Home Insurance. There are
multiple payment options available including internet banking, credit card, debit card and
cash card.
23
Jet Airways
Quality Certification
Jet Airways has received an extensive range of awards and commendations for every kind of
service it provides. Our efficiency and quality of the highest standards in every sphere of
service has earned us a prestigious Super brand status.
Certification for the product and service ranges includes Design, Development and Delivery
of Customer Services that meet world-class standards.
Jet Airways (India) Ltd. has also earned the distinction of receiving the IATA Operational
Safety Audit (IOSA) Registration.
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA)
Registration
Jet Airways (India) Ltd. has earned the distinction of receiving the IATA Operational Safety
Audit (IOSA) Registration. The airline has successfully completed the Operational Safety
Audit and has been listed in the IOSA Registry www.iata.org/registry
IOSA is a quality audit programme under the continuing stewardship of the IATA
(International Air Transport Association). It is a globally recognized and accepted
benchmarking and evaluation system for assessing the operational management and control
systems of an airline. IOSA uses internationally accepted quality audit principles that ensure
that the audits are conducted in a standardized and consistent manner. Airlines use IOSA
Registration for a variety of benefits, which include improving flight safety, code share
facilitation, and audit reduction.
24
With the implementation and international acceptance of the IOSA, the industry has achieved
the benefits of cost-efficiency through a significant reduction in audits. The focus and scope
of the IOSA audit is on proper documentation and implementation of standard operating
procedures in various operational areas of the airline such as, Flight Operations, Aircraft
Engineering and Maintenance, Flight Dispatch, Cabin Operations, Security, Ground Handling
and Cargo.
The IOSA Programme is recognized by the member airlines of the IATA as a benchmark for
airline safety and quality. At present, 107 airlines worldwide have been listed in the IOSA
Registry.
Jet Airways Bags 'The Oscar of Branding' and becomes a SUPERBRAND
The prestigious Super brand status has been conferred on Jet Airways, recognizing it as one
of the leading Super brands in India.
This 'Oscar of Branding' has been awarded by the world's leading authority on branding, an
independent Super brands Council comprising of the most eminent professionals in
marketing and advertising.
This is the first time that the 'Super brand' concept has been brought to India for endorsing
leading consumer brands.
Jet Airways will be featured as one of the strongest Indian brands in the Superbrands volume
to be printed in Italy, which will be released at the special Superbrands Gala Event in
December this year.
25
With this latest honour, Jet Airways joins an exclusive club of this year's winners from India.
The airline was selected out of a list of 711 leading Indian brands across 98 categories. The
selection criteria define a Super brand as one, "that has established the finest reputation in its
field, which offers consumers significant emotional and or physical advantages over its
competitors which (consciously or sub-consciously) consumers want, recognize, and are
willing to pay a premium for."
The selection process avoids any ranking by market share and instead focuses on the brand
image and perception of the product. The brands' dominance, goodwill, consumer loyalty,
trust and emotional bonding influence the selection.
Super brands are a concept that started ten years ago in the United Kingdom to chronicle case
studies of exceptional brands; to pay tribute to them and their brand guardians. Since then, it
has been replicated in 25 countries except India. Some of the leading countries that have
adopted the Super brand concept are Australia, France, Germany, Holland, Hong Kong, Italy,
Malaysia, Philippines, USA, Singapore, Spain, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Ireland,
Egypt, and Denmark.
The airline has won several coveted national and international awards. These include the
Boeing Company's honour for consistently maintaining the highest technical dispatch
reliability in excess of 99 per cent for 2002, the leading business weekly, Business World's
'India's Most Respected Company in the Travel and Hospitality Sector' for 2003, Travel
Trade Gazette's (TTG) 'Best Domestic Airline Award' for 2002 among 14 countries in the
Asia-Pacific region, Air Transport World (ATW) 'Market Development Award' for 2001 for
26
the best domestic airline, the Qimpro Gold Standard for 2001 and the Hospitality & Food
Service (H&FS) 'Best Domestic Airline' award four times.
27