breakout session 1 report 10.26.12

Upload: northeast-wind-resource-center-nwrc

Post on 02-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Breakout Session 1 Report 10.26.12

    1/5

    Breakout Session I The Use ofInformation in Wind Siting -

    identification, categorization and

    prioritizationReport Back Summary

    October 26, 2012 Workshop

    Injecting Useful and Credible Information into Wind Power Siting

  • 8/11/2019 Breakout Session 1 Report 10.26.12

    2/5

    Breakout Session 1 Report Back-

    Question 1

    What 2-3 issues are most ripe for

    additional information,questions or needs for

    improvement/additional

    research information would

    you prioritize for future

    attention?

    Report back on 1-2

    1. What is the cumulative impacts post-construction?Conduct studies post-construction; get public

    perceptions on sound, aesthetics, and health impacts

    within the context that more turbines are coming.

    2. Federal research into health impacts from wind.

    High level research on health issues specifically.Include: health history of individuals for those

    living w/in proximity of turbine.

    3. Comparing wind to other generation technologies?4. Understanding the level of complaint around NE

    wind projects why are the sites that are causing

    problems doing that? Understanding what has beensuccessful and not successful about development of

    wind projects in NE.

    5. How does the size of turbines or projects relate tothe appropriate guidelines surrounding them?

    October 26, 2012 WorkshopInjecting Useful and Credible Information into Wind Power Siting

  • 8/11/2019 Breakout Session 1 Report 10.26.12

    3/5

    Breakout Session 1 Report Back-

    Question 1

    What 2-3 issues are most ripe for

    additional information,questions or needs for

    improvement/additional

    research information would

    you prioritize for future

    attention?

    Report back on 1-2

    6. Data to guide setback requirements, particularly asthey relate to human health impacts

    7. Research on what leads communities to accept orreject projects

    What models for community engagement are

    most successful?

    Other issues (non-physical) affect perception of

    sound (Psychologicalsense of control, etc.)

    8. Credibility=information + context + impact +mitigation. Not just technical info

    9. Cumulative impacts of wind in the context ofcumulative impacts of energy development

    10.What should you do if a project meets allregulatory/permitting issues and the community still

    rejects it?

    October 26, 2012 WorkshopInjecting Useful and Credible Information into Wind Power Siting

  • 8/11/2019 Breakout Session 1 Report 10.26.12

    4/5

    Breakout Session 1 Report Back -

    Question 2

    What 2-3 pieces of advice would

    you offer to the region,states, or sites (specific

    proposals as well as

    guidelines/regulations) to

    guide effective use of

    information in wind siting?

    Report back on 1-2

    1. Treat all stakeholders with dignity; engagestakeholders early in the process. Use consensus

    building. ready to find the truth (does this exist)

    from all sides.

    2. Evaluate the salience of information beingdeveloped is it really contributing to the process;

    be prepared to refine methodology as you move

    forward at state level not creating a process that is

    just a hoop one has to jump through.

    3.Need for a complaints resolution process not justa hotline, but response and mitigation

    procedures/funding determined before project is

    permitted.

    4.Development of community assessments of benefitsand impacts of energy development before projects

    are even considered that allows a framework for

    decisions when projects are proposed.

    October 26, 2012 WorkshopInjecting Useful and Credible Information into Wind Power Siting

  • 8/11/2019 Breakout Session 1 Report 10.26.12

    5/5

    Breakout Session 1 Report Back -

    Question 2

    What 2-3 pieces of advice would

    you offer to the region,

    states, or sites (specific

    proposals as well as

    guidelines/regulations) to

    guide effective use of

    information in wind siting?

    Report back on 1-2

    5. Bring in unaffiliated third-party experts, ensuretransparency

    6. Put the community at the center of the processPerform comprehensive community outreach at

    early stages of project

    7. Information from experts should be part of anindependent process and based on prior agreement

    as to what is studied and the scope of the study

    8. Information must be understandable, especiallyregarding issues that are subjectively experienced.

    How to present and make it meaningful andaccessible to everyone? Examples: maps, listening

    booths, site visits

    October 26, 2012 WorkshopInjecting Useful and Credible Information into Wind Power Siting